Talk:Emma Kaili Metcalf Beckley Nakuina/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Tbhotch (talk · contribs) 16:54, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it reasonably well written?
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources (it also includes an appropriate reference section):
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary (including direct quotations):
- C. No original research:
- D. No copyright violations:
- A. References to sources (it also includes an appropriate reference section):
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- B. Focused:
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- Does it contain images (or other media) to illustrate (or support) the topic?
- A. Images (and other media) are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- B. Images (and other media) are provided where possible and are relevant, with suitable captions:
- A. Images (and other media) are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass or Fail:
Resolved comments from Tbhotch |
---|
;Images
|
- Name
- For what I've read, "Emma Kaili Metcalf Beckley Nakuina" is not her WP:COMMONAME
- This is the version used in Notable Women of Hawaii and American Women Historians, 1700s-1990s: A Biographical Dictionary. There is no consistent usage. Calling her simply Emma Nakuina would be wrong given the importance of her first marriage and her own maiden name. KAVEBEAR (talk) 23:07, 2 March 2019 (UTC)
- Giving her her full name gives the wrong impression her (almost) full name is her common name, when it's based on 1-2 sources. © Tbhotch™ (en-2.5). 21:10, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
- What do you suggest? Don’t know what you mean by almost since Kaili is merely the shorten form of Kaʻilikapuolono. KAVEBEAR (talk) 00:57, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
- I'll take it to RM instead, as I'm as divided as the sources are. © Tbhotch™ (en-2.5). 14:56, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
Article on hold. © Tbhotch™ (en-2.5). 02:23, 2 March 2019 (UTC)
- Not having any other objection, I pass its nomination. Good work. © Tbhotch™ (en-2.5). 14:56, 5 March 2019 (UTC)