Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/2987491.2987498acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageshtConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Can I Have Your Attention, Please?: An Empirical Investigation of Media Multitasking during University Lectures

Published: 26 September 2016 Publication History

Abstract

The growing prevalence of continuous media use among university students in lecture environments has potential for detrimental effects. In this study the focus is placed upon the implications of digital media multitasking in a university lecture context for academic performance and learning. Previous studies reveal that students frequently engage with digital media whilst in a university lecture. Moreover, research has shown that multitasking imposes a cognitive cost, detrimental to learning and task execution. We propose, accordingly, that the constant distractions created by digital media interrupt the thought and communication processes of students and, subsequently, obstruct their ability to learn. To test this proposition we conduct a survey-based empirical investigation of digital media use and academic performance among undergraduate university students. A clear negative correlation was shown between frequency of media use and academic performance. This result confirms the hypothesis that there exists a negative correlation between digital media use during lectures and academic performance. The confirmation of this negative relationship suggests that media use poses a significant distraction to students.

References

[1]
F. Bannister and D. Remenyi. Multitasking: The Uncertain Impact of Technology on Knowledge Workers and Managers. The Electronic Journal Information Systems Evaluation, 12(1):1--12, 2009.
[2]
F. Bardhi, A. J. Rohm, and F. Sultan. Tuning in and tuning out: media multitasking among young consumers. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 9(4):316--332, jul 2010.
[3]
N. Baron. Adjusting the volume: Technology and multitasking in discourse control. MIT Press, Cambridge, feb 2008.
[4]
R. Benbunan-Fich, R. F. Adler, and T. Mavlanova. Measuring multitasking behavior with activity-based metrics. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 18(2):1--22, jun 2011.
[5]
J. Bolter. Theory and practice in new media studies. MIT Press, Cambridge, 2003.
[6]
R. N. Bolton, A. Parasuraman, A. Hoefnagels, N. Migchels, S. Kabadayi, T. Gruber, Y. Komarova Loureiro, and D. Solnet. Understanding Generation Y and their use of social media: a review and research agenda. Journal of Service Management, 24(3):245--267, jun 2013.
[7]
D. E. Broadbent. Perception and communication. Pergamon Press, Madison, 1958.
[8]
L. Burak. Multitasking in the University Classroom Multitasking in the University Classroom. International Journal for the scholarship of teaching and learning, 6(2):8, 2012.
[9]
N. Carr. The Shallows: How the internet is changing the way we think, read and remember. Atlantic Books Ltd, sep 2010.
[10]
E. Dahlstrom, C. Brooks, S. Grajek, and J. Reeves. Ecar study of students and information technology, 2015. Technical report, ECAR, 2015.
[11]
P. David, J.-H. Kim, J. S. Brickman, W. Ran, and C. M. Curtis. Mobile phone distraction while studying. New Media & Society, 17(10):1661--1679, apr 2014.
[12]
F. D. Davis. Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3):319, sep 1989.
[13]
B. E. Ericson. The Relationship Between Student Use of Socially Interactive Technology and Engagement and Involvement in the Undergraduate Experience. PhD thesis, Boston College, 2011.
[14]
C. B. Fried. In-class laptop use and its effects on student learning. Computers & Education, 50(3):906--914, apr 2008.
[15]
M. S. Gazzaniga, R. B. Ivry, and G. R. Mangun. Cognitive Neuroscience: The Biology of the Mind. Norton, 2009.
[16]
E. B. Goldstein. Sensation and Perception. Cengage Learning, Wadsworth, 2009.
[17]
E. Isaacs, A. Walendowski, S. Whittaker, D. J. Schiano, and C. Kamm. The character, functions, and styles of instant messaging in the workplace. pages 11--20. ACM, 2002.
[18]
S. Jeong and M. Fishbein. Predictors of multitasking with media: Media factors and audience factors. Media Psychology, 10(3):364--384, 2007.
[19]
S.-H. Jeong and Y. Hwang. Does Multitasking Increase or Decrease Persuasion? Effects of Multitasking on Comprehension and Counterarguing. Journal of Communication, 62(4):571--587, aug 2012.
[20]
K. Johnston, M.-M. Chen, and M. Hauman. Use, Perception and Attitude of University Students Towards Facebook and Twitter. Electronic Journal of Information Systems Evaluation, 16(3):200--210, 2013.
[21]
C. Jones and A. Hosein. Profiling university students' use of technology: where is the NET generation divide? The International Journal of Technology Knowledge and Society, 6(3):43--58, 2010.
[22]
T. Judd and G. Kennedy. Measurement and evidence of computer-based task switching and multitasking by 'Net Generation' students. Computers and Education, 56(3):625--631, 2011.
[23]
R. Junco. In-class multitasking and academic performance. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(6):2236--2243, nov 2012.
[24]
R. Junco. Too much face and not enough books: The relationship between multiple indices of Facebook use and academic performance. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(1):187--198, jan 2012.
[25]
R. Junco. Comparing actual and self-reported measures of Facebook use. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(3):626--631, may 2013.
[26]
R. Junco and S. Cotten. A decade of distraction? How multitasking affects student outcomes. In A Decade in Internet Time Symposium on the Dynamics of the Internet and Society., Oxford, 2011. Oxford Internet Institute, University of Oxford.
[27]
R. Junco and S. R. Cotten. Perceived academic effects of instant messaging use. Computers & Education, 56(2):370--378, feb 2011.
[28]
D. Kahneman. Attention and Effort. The American Journal of Psychology, 88(2):339, 1973.
[29]
C. Konig, M. Buhner, and G. Murling. Working memory, fluid intelligence, and attention are predictors of multitasking performance, but polychronicity and extraversion are not. Human performance, 18(3):243--266, 2005.
[30]
T. Kreutzer. Internet and online media usage on mobile phones among low-income urban youth in cape town. International Journal of Education and Development using ICT, 5(5):1--21, 2009.
[31]
A. Lang. Using the limited capacity model of motivated mediated message processing to design effective cancer communication messages. Journal of Communication, 56(SUPPL.):57--80, 2006.
[32]
R. LaRose, C. A. Lin, and M. S. Eastin. Unregulated Internet usage: Addiction, habit, or deficient self-regulation? Media Psychology, 5(3):225--253, 2003.
[33]
M. Lüders. Conceptualizing personal media. New Media & Society, 10(5):683--702, 2008.
[34]
R. Marois and J. Ivanoff. Capacity limits of information processing in the brain. TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences, 9(6), 2005.
[35]
M. McLuhan. Understanding media: The extensions of man. MIT Press, Cambridge, 1966.
[36]
E. Miller and J. Cohen. An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function. Annual review of neuroscience, 24:167--202, 2001.
[37]
M. A. Moreno, L. Jelenchick, R. Koff, J. Eikoff, C. Diermyer, and D. A. Christakis. Computers in Human Behavior Internet use and multitasking among older adolescents: An experience sampling approach. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(4):1097--1102, 2012.
[38]
H. Müller and P. Rabbitt. Reflexive and voluntary orienting of visual attention: time course of activation and resistance to interruption. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15(2):315, 1989.
[39]
D. North, K. Johnston, and J. Ophoff. The Use of Mobile Phones by South African University Students. Issues in Informing Science and Information Technology, 11:115--138, 2014.
[40]
E. Ophir, C. Nass, and A. D. Wagner. Cognitive control in media multitaskers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(37):15583--15587, sep 2009.
[41]
A. Oulasvirta and P. Saariluoma. Long-term working memory and interrupting messages in humanâĂŞcomputer interaction. Behaviour & Information Technology, 23(1):53--64, 2004.
[42]
F. Sana, T. Weston, and N. J. Cepeda. Laptop multitasking hinders classroom learning for both users and nearby peers. Computers & Education, 62:24--31, mar 2013.
[43]
B. Sparrow, J. Liu, and D. M. Wegner. Google Effects on Memory: Cognitive Consequences of Having Information at Our Fingertips. Science, 333(6043):776--778, aug 2011.
[44]
P. Thompson. The digital natives as learners: Technology use patterns and approaches to learning. Computers & Education, 65:12--33, jul 2013.
[45]
M. N. Tombu, C. L. Asplund, P. E. Dux, D. Godwin, J. W. Martin, and R. Marois. A Unified attentional bottleneck in the human brain. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 108(33):13426--31, aug 2011.
[46]
J. K. Tsotsos, S. M. Culhane, W. Y. Kei Wai, Y. Lai, N. Davis, and F. Nuflo. Modeling visual attention via selective tuning. Artificial Intelligence, 78(1-2):507--545, oct 1995.
[47]
W. van der Schuur, S. E. Baumgartner, S. R. Sumter, and P. M. Valkenburg. The consequences of media multitasking for youth: A review. Computers in Human Behavior, 53:204--215, 2015.
[48]
C. Wallis. The Impacts of Media Multitasking on Children's Learning & Development. Technical report, New York, 2010.
[49]
L. J. Wardley and C. F. Mang. Student observations: Introducing iPads into university classrooms. Education and Information Technologies, pages 1--18, jun 2015.
[50]
C. D. Wickens. Multiple resources and performance prediction. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 3(2):159--177, 2002.
[51]
E. Wood, L. Zivcakova, P. Gentile, K. Archer, D. De Pasquale, and A. Nosko. Examining the impact of off-task multi-tasking with technology on real-time classroom learning. Computers & Education, 58(1):365--374, jan 2012.
[52]
W. Zhang and L. Zhang. Explicating multitasking with computers: Gratifications and situations. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(5):1883--1891, sep 2012.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Learning in hybrid classes: the role of off-task activitiesScientific Reports10.1038/s41598-023-50962-z14:1Online publication date: 18-Jan-2024
  • (2022)Empowering College Students to Decrease Digital Distraction Through the Use of Self-Regulated Learning StrategiesContemporary Educational Technology10.30935/cedtech/1245614:4(ep388)Online publication date: 2022
  • (2022)A systematic review of media multitasking in educational contexts: trends, gaps, and antecedentsInteractive Learning Environments10.1080/10494820.2022.203276031:10(6279-6294)Online publication date: 15-Feb-2022
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
SAICSIT '16: Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the South African Institute of Computer Scientists and Information Technologists
September 2016
422 pages
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

In-Cooperation

  • AWS: Amazon Web Services
  • IBM: IBM

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 26 September 2016

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Distraction
  2. attention
  3. education
  4. media
  5. multitasking

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Conference

SAICSIT '16

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 187 of 439 submissions, 43%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)93
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)5
Reflects downloads up to 26 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Learning in hybrid classes: the role of off-task activitiesScientific Reports10.1038/s41598-023-50962-z14:1Online publication date: 18-Jan-2024
  • (2022)Empowering College Students to Decrease Digital Distraction Through the Use of Self-Regulated Learning StrategiesContemporary Educational Technology10.30935/cedtech/1245614:4(ep388)Online publication date: 2022
  • (2022)A systematic review of media multitasking in educational contexts: trends, gaps, and antecedentsInteractive Learning Environments10.1080/10494820.2022.203276031:10(6279-6294)Online publication date: 15-Feb-2022
  • (2021)What Students Do While You Are Teaching – Computer and Smartphone Use in Class and Its Implication on LearningHuman-Computer Interaction – INTERACT 202110.1007/978-3-030-85616-8_29(501-520)Online publication date: 26-Aug-2021
  • (2020)Media Multitasking, Online Vigilance and Academic Performance among Students in three Southern African CountriesComputers & Education10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104056(104056)Online publication date: Oct-2020
  • (2019)Digital distraction outside the classroomJournal of Computing Sciences in Colleges10.5555/3344081.334408634:7(46-55)Online publication date: 1-Apr-2019
  • (2018)Off-Task Media Use in Lectures: Towards a Theory of DeterminantsICT Education10.1007/978-3-030-05813-5_4(49-64)Online publication date: 31-Dec-2018
  • (2017)In-lecture media use and academic performanceComputers in Human Behavior10.1016/j.chb.2017.08.03077:C(86-94)Online publication date: 1-Dec-2017
  • (2017)A New Generation of Students: Digital Media in Academic ContextsICT Education10.1007/978-3-319-69670-6_2(19-36)Online publication date: 18-Nov-2017

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media