Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
research-article

In-lecture media use and academic performance

Published: 01 December 2017 Publication History

Abstract

The current generation of university students display an increasing propensity for media multitasking behaviour with digital devices such as laptops, tablets and smartphones. A growing body of empirical evidence has shown that this behaviour is associated with reduced academic performance. In this study it is proposed that the subject area within which an individual is situated may influence the relationship between media multitasking and academic performance. This proposition is evaluated, firstly, by means of a meta-review of prior studies in this area and, secondly, through a survey-based study of 1678 students at a large university in South Africa. Our findings suggest that little or no attention has been paid to variations between students from different subject areas in previous work and, based on our data, that subject area does influence the relationship between media use and academic performance. The study found that while a significant negative correlation exists between in-lecture media use and academic performance for students in the Arts and Social Sciences, the same pattern is not observable for students in the faculties of Engineering, Economic and Management Sciences, and Medical and Health Sciences. Media use (MU) and academic performance (AP) studies omit subject area comparison.Sample populations tend to be biased toward social science programs.Data show differences in the type and frequency of MU across subject areas.Differences between MU and AP correlations were found for different subject areas.MU is a stronger predictor of AP for students in the soft sciences.

References

[1]
B.L. Berg, H. Lune, H. Lune, Pearson, Boston, MA, 2004.
[2]
J.D. Bolter, Theory and practice in new media studies, in: Digital media revisited, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA, 2003, pp. 15-33.
[3]
L. Burak, Multitasking in the university classroom, International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 6 (2012) 8-20.
[4]
L.M. Carrier, N.A. Cheever, L.D. Rosen, S. Benitez, J. Chang, 2009.
[5]
R.C.K. Chan, D. Shum, T. Toulopoulou, E.Y.H. Chen, Assessment of executive functions: Review of instruments and identification of critical issues, Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 23 (2008) 201-216.
[6]
R.-S. Chen, C.-H. Ji, Investigating the relationship between thinking style and personal electronic device use and its implications for academic performance, Computers in Human Behavior, 52 (2015) 177-183.
[7]
Q. Chen, Z. Yan, Does multitasking with mobile phones affect learning? A review, Computers in Human Behavior, 54 (2016) 34-42.
[8]
W.C. Clapp, A. Gazzaley, Distinct mechanisms for the impact of distraction and interruption on working memory in aging, 33 (2013) 134-148.
[9]
J. Conklin, Hypertext: An introduction and survey, IEEE Computer, 20 (1987) 17-41.
[10]
S.R. Cotten, B. McCullough, R. Adams, Technological influences on social ties across the lifespan, in: Handbook of life-span development, Springer Publishing Company, 2011, pp. 647-671.
[11]
E. Dahlstrom, J. Bichsel, Study of undergraduate students and information technology, 2014, 2014.
[12]
S.L. Davis, D.A. Pastor, K.E. Barron, Examining goal orientation similarities and differences among college majors: An hlm analysis, 2004.
[13]
A.D. Elder, College students' cell phone use, beliefs, and effects on their learning, College Student Journal, 47 (2013) 585-593.
[14]
A. Feenberg, M. Bakardjieva, Virtual community: no killer implication, New Media & Society, 6 (2004) 37-43.
[15]
C.B. Fried, In-class laptop use and its effects on student learning, Computers & Education, 50 (2008) 906-914.
[16]
P. Gaudreau, D. Miranda, A. Gareau, Canadian university students in wireless classrooms: What do they do on their laptops and does it really matter?, Computers & Education, 70 (2014) 245-255.
[17]
A. Gazzaley, L.D. Rosen, The distracted mind. No. June, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2016.
[18]
J. Heinstrom, Psychological factors behind incidental information acquisition, Library and Information Science Research, 28 (2006) 579-594.
[19]
W.C. Jacobsen, R. Forste, The wired generation: Academic and social outcomes of electronic media use among university students, Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 14 (2011) 275-280.
[20]
S.-H. Jeong, Y. Hwang, Does multitasking increase or decrease persuasion? effects of multitasking on comprehension and counterarguing, Journal of Communication, 62 (2012) 571-587.
[21]
T. Judd, Making sense of multitasking: Key behaviours, Computers & Education, 63 (2013) 358-367.
[22]
R. Junco, In-class multitasking and academic performance, Computers in Human Behavior, 28 (2012) 2236-2243.
[23]
R. Junco, S. Cotten, Adecade of Distraction? How multitasking affects student outcomes, in: Adecade in internet time symposium on the dynamics of the internet and society, 2011.
[24]
R. Junco, S.R. Cotten, No A 4 U: The relationship between multitasking and academic performance, Computers & Education, 59 (2012) 505-514.
[25]
D. Kahneman, Attention and effort, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1973.
[26]
H. Kennedy, Beyond anonymity, or future directions for internet identity research, New Media & Society, 8 (2006) 859-876.
[27]
P.A. Kirschner, P. De Bruyckere, The myths of the digital native and the multitasker, Teaching and Teacher Education, 67 (2017) 135-142.
[28]
D.A. Kolb, Experiential Learning: Experience as the source of learning and development, Pearson Education, 2014.
[29]
J. Lee, L. Lin, T. Robertson, The impact of media multitasking on learning, Learning, Media and Technology, 37 (2012) 94-104.
[30]
J.-L. Leysens, D.B. le Roux, D.A. Parry, Can I have your attention please? An empirical investigation of media multitasking during university lectures, in: Proceedings of the 2016 annual research conference on South african Institute of computer Scientists and information Technologists, ACM, 2016.
[31]
R.H. Logie, S. Trawley, A. Law, Multitasking : Multiple, domain-specific cognitive functions in a virtual environment, 2011.
[32]
K.K. Loh, R. Kanai, How has the internet reshaped human cognition?, The Neuroscientist, 22 (2015) 506-520.
[33]
M.A. Moreno, L. Jelenchick, R. Koff, J. Eikoff, C. Diermyer, D.A. Christakis, Internet use and multitasking among older adolescents : An experience sampling approach, Computers in Human Behavior, 28 (2012) 1097-1102.
[34]
R. Neumann, S. Parry, T. Becher, Variations in vivas: Quality and equality in British PhD assessments, Studies in Higher Education, 27 (2002) 263-273.
[35]
E. Ophir, C. Nass, A.D. Wagner, Cognitive control in media multitaskers, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106 (2009) 15583-15587.
[36]
M.D. Osterman, Exploring relationships between thinking style and sex, age, academic major, occupation, and levels of arts engagement among professionals working in museums, Florida International University, 2015.
[37]
A. Oulasvirta, P. Saariluoma, Long-term working memory and interrupting messages in humancomputer interaction, Behaviour & Information Technology, 23 (2004) 53-64.
[38]
D.A. Parry, The digitally-mediated study experiences of undergraduate students in South Africa, Stellenbosch University, 2017.
[39]
M.A. Pollard, M.L. Courage, Working memory capacity predicts effective multitasking, Computers in Human Behavior, 76 (2017) 450-462.
[40]
E.F. Risko, D. Buchanan, S. Medimorec, A. Kingstone, Everyday attention: Mind wandering and computer use during lectures, Computers & Education, 68 (2013) 275-283.
[41]
L.D. Rosen, L. Mark Carrier, N. Cheever, Facebook and texting made me do it: Media-induced task-switching while studying, Computers in Human Behavior, 29 (2013) 948-958.
[42]
D.B. le Roux, D.A. Parry, Anew generation of Students: Digital media in academic contexts, in: 46th annual conference of the southern african computer lecturers' association, SACLA 2017, Springer, Magaliesburg, 2017.
[43]
A. Saleh, Brain hemisphericity and academic majors: A correlation study, College Student Journal, 35 (2001) 193.
[44]
D.D. Salvucci, N.A. Taatgen, The multitasking mind, Aging, 7 (2015) 956-963.
[45]
G. Small, G. Vorgan, iBrain: Surviving the technological alteration of the modern mind, Harper Collins, 2009.
[46]
A. Spink, M. Park, Information and non?information multitasking interplay, Journal of Documentation, 61 (Aug 2005) 548-554.
[47]
D. Tapscott, Growing up Digital: The rise of the net generation, Oracle Press series. McGraw-Hill, 1998.
[48]
P. Thompson, The digital natives as learners: Technology use patterns and approaches to learning, Computers & Education, 65 (2013) 12-33.
[49]
Times Higher Education, Times higher education World university Rankings, 2017. https://www.timeshighereducation.com/world-university-rankings
[50]
W.A. Van der Schuur, S.E. Baumgartner, S.R. Sumter, P.M. Valkenburg, The consequences of media multitasking for youth: A review, Computers in Human Behavior, 53 (2015) 204-215.
[51]
L.J. Wardley, C.F. Mang, Student observations: Introducing iPads into university classrooms, Education and Information Technologies (2015) 1-18.
[52]
J. Webster, R.T. Watson, Analyzing the past to prepare for the future: Writing a literature review, MIS Quarterly, 26 (2002) xiii-xxiii.
[53]
L.-f. Zhang, Thinking styles and the big five personality traits, Educational Psychology, 22 (2002) 17-31.

Cited By

View all
  • (2021)Beneficial NeglectProceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies10.1145/34480895:1(1-26)Online publication date: 30-Mar-2021
  • (2019)Social networking and academic performance: A longitudinal perspectiveEducation and Information Technologies10.1007/s10639-018-9843-y24:2(1545-1561)Online publication date: 1-Mar-2019

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Computers in Human Behavior
Computers in Human Behavior  Volume 77, Issue C
December 2017
449 pages

Publisher

Elsevier Science Publishers B. V.

Netherlands

Publication History

Published: 01 December 2017

Author Tags

  1. Academic performance
  2. Cognitive control
  3. Media multitasking
  4. Subject area

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 26 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2021)Beneficial NeglectProceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies10.1145/34480895:1(1-26)Online publication date: 30-Mar-2021
  • (2019)Social networking and academic performance: A longitudinal perspectiveEducation and Information Technologies10.1007/s10639-018-9843-y24:2(1545-1561)Online publication date: 1-Mar-2019

View Options

View options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media