Exploring the Potential of AI Chatbots for Supporting Individuals with Dementia: Thematic Insights from User-Centered Workshops
Pages 432 - 434
Abstract
Despite the growing popularity and applications of AI-driven chatbots across various domains, their potential to support people with dementia remains relatively under-explored in human–computer interaction (HCI). To address this gap, we conducted four workshops with 17 participants (5 with mild dementia and 12 informal caregivers) to explore the needs, concerns, and preferences of people with dementia regarding chatbot use. This study focuses specifically on the insights gained from participants with dementia. Reflexive thematic analysis revealed that participants expressed interest in AI chatbots for casual interactions, particularly to alleviate social isolation and maintain language skills. They also saw the chatbots’ potential to act as ‘digital diaries’ for memory triggers and to offer memory training exercises to help with challenges in recalling names and words. However, concerns were raised about over-reliance, awareness of conversing with a chatbot, and trust.
References
[1]
Alzheimer’s Disease International. 2019. World Alzheimer Report 2019: Attitudes to dementia. Technical Report. Alzheimer’s Disease International, London.
[2]
Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2022. Thematic analysis: a practical guide. SAGE, London ; Thousand Oaks, California. OCLC: on1247204005.
[3]
Mariona Carós, Maite Garolera, Petia Radeva, and Xavier Giro-i Nieto. 2020. Automatic Reminiscence Therapy for Dementia. In Proceedings of the 2020 International Conference on Multimedia Retrieval. ACM, Dublin Ireland, 383–387. https://doi.org/10.1145/3372278.3391927
[4]
Judith Donath. 2020. Ethical Issues in Our Relationship with Artificial Entities. In The Oxford Handbook of Ethics of AI, Markus Dubber, Frank Pasquale, and Sunit Das (Eds.). Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, Pages 52–73. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190067397.013.3
[5]
Meagan T. Farrell, Laura B. Zahodne, Yaakov Stern, Jhedy Dorrejo, Philip Yeung, and Stephanie Cosentino. 2014. Subjective Word-Finding Difficulty Reduces Engagement in Social Leisure Activities in Alzheimer’s Disease. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 62, 6 (June 2014), 1056–1063. https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.12850
[6]
Becky Field, Gail Mountain, Jane Burgess, Laura Di Bona, Daniel Kelleher, Jacqueline Mundy, and Jennifer Wenborn. 2019. Recruiting Hard to Reach Populations to Studies: Breaking the Silence: An Example from a Study That Recruited People with Dementia. BMJ Open 9, 11 (Nov. 2019), e030829. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030829
[7]
Kathleen Kara Fitzpatrick, Alison Darcy, and Molly Vierhile. 2017. Delivering Cognitive Behavior Therapy to Young AdultsWith Symptoms of Depression and Anxiety Using a Fully Automated Conversational Agent (Woebot): A Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Mental Health 4, 2 (April 2017), 11. https://doi.org/10.2196/mental.7785
[8]
Serge Gauthier, Pedro Rosa-Neto, José A. Morais, and Claire Webster. 2021. World Alzheimer Report 2021: Journey through the diagnosis of dementia. Technical Report. Alzheimer’s Disease International, London. https://www.alzint.org/u/World-Alzheimer-Report-2021.pdf
[9]
Vanessa Gomes, Teresa Simón, and Miguel Lázaro. 2024. “I don’t know who you are”: Anomia for People’s Names in Alzheimer’s Disease. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition 31, 5 (Sept. 2024), 956–986. https://doi.org/10.1080/13825585.2024.2315773
[10]
James Hodge, Sarah Foley, Dan Lambton-Howard, Laura Booi, Kyle Montague, Sandra Coulter, David Kirk, and Kellie Morrissey. 2023. Exploring Participants’ Representations and Shifting Sensitivities in a Hackathon for Dementia. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 30, 3 (June 2023), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1145/3571814
[11]
Samuel Holmes, Anne Moorhead, Raymond Bond, Huiru Zheng, Vivien Coates, and Michael McTear. 2019. Usability Testing of a Healthcare Chatbot: Can We Use Conventional Methods to Assess Conversational User Interfaces?. In ECCE 2019 - Proceedings of the 31st European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics: “Design for Cognition”. ACM, Belfast, UK, 207–214. https://doi.org/10.1145/3335082.3335094 ISBN: 9781450371667.
[12]
Alina Huldtgren, Fabian Mertl, Anja Vormann, and Chris Geiger. 2015. Probing the Potential of Multimedia Artefacts to Support Communication of People with Dementia. In Human-Computer Interaction – INTERACT 2015, Julio Abascal, Simone Barbosa, Mirko Fetter, Tom Gross, Philippe Palanque, and Marco Winckler (Eds.). Vol. 9298. Springer International Publishing, Cham, 71–79. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22698-9_6 Series Title: Lecture Notes in Computer Science.
[13]
Samantha Jiménez, Jesús Favela, Ángeles Quezada, Arnulfo Alanis, Edgar Castillo, and Eduardo Villegas. 2022. Alexa to Support Patients with Dementia and Family Caregivers in Challenging Behaviors. In Information Systems and Technologies, Alvaro Rocha, Hojjat Adeli, Gintautas Dzemyda, and Fernando Moreira (Eds.). Vol. 468. Springer International Publishing, Cham, 336–345. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-04826-5_33 Series Title: Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems.
[14]
Sven Joubert, François Maquestiaux, Adriana Enriquez-Rosas, Juan Manuel Villalpando, Catherine Brodeur, and Nathalie Bier. 2023. Smartphone Use as an Efficient Tool to Improve Anomia in Primary Progressive Aphasia. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation 34, 3 (March 2023), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/09602011.2023.2181824
[15]
J. P. Kesslak, K. Nackoul, and C. A. Sandman. 1997. Memory Training for Individuals with Alzheimer’s Disease Improves Name Recall. Behavioural Neurology 10, 4 (1997), 137–142. https://doi.org/10.1155/1997/793150
[16]
Blanka Klimova, Petra Maresova, and Kamil Kuca. 2016. Assistive technologies for managing language disorders in dementia. Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment 12 (Feb. 2016), 533–540. https://doi.org/10.2147/NDT.S95903
[17]
Jonathan Lazar, Heidi Feng Jinjuan, and Harry Hochheiser. 2017. Research Methods in Human-Computer Interaction. Morgan Kaufmann, Cambridge, USA.
[18]
Yi Chieh Lee, Naomi Yamashita, and Yun Huang. 2020. Designing a Chatbot as a Mediator for Promoting Deep Self-Disclosure to a Real Mental Health Professional. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 4, CSCW1 (2020), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1145/3392836
[19]
Niharika Mathur, Kunal Dhodapkar, Tamara Zubatiy, Jiachen Li, Brian Jones, and Elizabeth Mynatt. 2022. A Collaborative Approach to Support Medication Management in Older Adults with Mild Cognitive Impairment Using Conversational Assistants (CAs). In Proceedings of the 24th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility. ACM, Athens Greece, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3517428.3544830
[20]
Graham J. McDougall, Ian M. McDonough, and Michael LaRocca. 2019. Memory Training for Adults with Probable Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Pilot Study. Aging & Mental Health 23, 10 (Oct. 2019), 1433–1441. https://doi.org/10.1080/13607863.2018.1484884
[21]
Andreea Muresan and Henning Pohl. 2019. Chats with Bots: Balancing Imitation and Engagement. In Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings. ACM, Glasgow, Scotland UK, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290607.3313084 ISBN: 9781450359719.
[22]
Jenny Ng, Emma Haller, and Angus Murray. 2022. The ethical chatbot: A viable solution to socio-legal issues. Alternative Law Journal 47, 4 (Dec. 2022), 308–313. https://doi.org/10.1177/1037969X221113598
[23]
Iryna Pentina, Tyler Hancock, and Tianling Xie. 2023. Exploring Relationship Development with Social Chatbots: A Mixed-Method Study of Replika. Computers in Human Behavior 140 (March 2023), 107600. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107600
[24]
Alisha Pradhan, Amanda Lazar, and Leah Findlater. 2020. Use of Intelligent Voice Assistants by Older Adults with Low Technology Use. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 27, 4 (Aug. 2020), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1145/3373759
[25]
Xiang-Zhi Qiu, Chien Wen (Tina) Yuan, Nanyi Bi, Ming-Chyi Huang, and Chuang-Wen You. 2023. Exploring the Challenges and Opportunities in Developing Systems to Improve Alcohol Use Disorder through Chatbot Technology. In Extended Abstracts of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, Hamburg Germany, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1145/3544549.3585635
[26]
Nicole Ruggiano, Ellen L. Brown, Lisa Roberts, C. Victoria Framil Suarez, Yan Luo, Zhichao Hao, and Vagelis Hristidis. 2021. Chatbots to Support People With Dementia and Their Caregivers: Systematic Review of Functions and Quality. Journal of Medical Internet Research 23, 6 (June 2021), 11. https://doi.org/10.2196/25006
[27]
Michael Shumanov and Lester Johnson. 2021. Making conversations with chatbots more personalized. Computers in Human Behavior 117 (April 2021), 106627. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106627
[28]
Marita Skjuve, Asbjørn Følstad, Knut Inge Fostervold, and Petter Bae Brandtzaeg. 2021. My Chatbot Companion - a Study of Human-Chatbot Relationships. International Journal of Human Computer Studies 149, December 2020 (2021), 102601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2021.102601
[29]
Vivian Ta, Caroline Griffith, Carolynn Boatfield, Xinyu Wang, Maria Civitello, Haley Bader, Esther DeCero, and Alexia Loggarakis. 2020. User Experiences of Social Support from Companion Chatbots in Everyday Contexts: Thematic Analysis. Journal of Medical Internet Research 22, 3 (2020), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.2196/16235
[30]
Stefano Valtolina and Mattia Marchionna. 2021. Design of a Chatbot to Assist the Elderly. In International Symposium on End User Development, Vol. 12724 LNCS. Springer International Publishing, Cham, 153–168. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-79840-6_10
[31]
Tianling Xie and Iryna Pentina. 2022. Attachment Theory as a Framework to Understand Relationships with Social Chatbots: A Case Study of Replika. In Proceedings of the 55th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. HICSS, Hawaii, USA, 2046–2055. https://doi.org/10.24251/hicss.2022.258 ISBN: 9780998133157.
[32]
Anna Xygkou, Chee Siang Ang, Panote Siriaraya, Jonasz Kopecki, Alexandra Covaci, and Eiman Kanjo. 2024. MindTalker: Navigating the Complexities of AI-Enhanced Social Engagement for People with Early-Stage Dementia. In CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’24). ACM, Honolulu, HI, USA, 15. https://doi.org/10.1145/3613904.3642538
[33]
Tamara Zubatiy, Kayci L. Vickers, Niharika Mathur, and Elizabeth D. Mynatt. 2021. Empowering Dyads of Older Adults with Mild Cognitive Impairment and Their Care Partners Using Conversational Agents. In Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings CHI ’21. ACM, Yokohama, Japan, 15. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445124 ISBN: 9781450380966.
Index Terms
- Exploring the Potential of AI Chatbots for Supporting Individuals with Dementia: Thematic Insights from User-Centered Workshops
Recommendations
Supporting dementia caregivers in Peru through chatbots: generative AI vs structured conversations.
BCS HCI '23: Proceedings of the 36th International BCS Human-Computer Interaction ConferenceIn Peru, dementia caregivers face burnout, depression, stress, and financial strain. Addressing their needs involves tackling the intricacies of caregiving and managing emotional burdens. Chatbots can serve as a viable support mechanism in regions with ...
Exploring how politeness impacts the user experience of chatbots for mental health support
AbstractPoliteness is important in human–human interaction when asking people to engage in sensitive conversations. If politeness manifests similarly in human–chatbot interaction, it may play an important role in the design of sensitive chatbot ...
Highlights- Politeness can both positively and negatively impact the chatbot user experience.
- The Personal politeness chatbot was experienced as caring and encouraging.
- The Passive politeness chatbot was experienced as too apologetic and ...
The Value of Experience-Centred Design Approaches in Dementia Research Contexts
CHI '17: Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsExperience-Centred Design (ECD) has been applied in numerous HCI projects to call attention to the particular and dialogical nature of people's experiences with technology. In this paper, we report on ECD within the context of publicly-funded, long-stay ...
Comments
Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
November 2024
502 pages
ISBN:9798400711787
DOI:10.1145/3687272
Copyright © 2024 Owner/Author.
Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.
Sponsors
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery
New York, NY, United States
Publication History
Published: 24 November 2024
Check for updates
Author Tags
Qualifiers
- Poster
- Research
- Refereed limited
Funding Sources
Conference
HAI '24
Sponsor:
HAI '24: International Conference on Human-Agent Interaction
November 24 - 27, 2024
Swansea, United Kingdom
Acceptance Rates
Overall Acceptance Rate 121 of 404 submissions, 30%
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- 0Total Citations
- 44Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)44
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)22
Reflects downloads up to 20 Jan 2025
Other Metrics
Citations
View Options
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Sign inFull Access
View options
View or Download as a PDF file.
PDFeReader
View online with eReader.
eReaderHTML Format
View this article in HTML Format.
HTML Format