Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
research-article
Open access

The Denizen Designer Project: Practices, Relationships, and Principles of Activist-Led Design

Published: 08 November 2024 Publication History

Abstract

Design activism is a way for designers and researchers to negotiate societal inequities and resulting implications for design practices. Within HCI and design, community-based methods are a common way to situate design engagements among those directly impacted by social inequities. Despite its potential for social impact, current approaches to design activism can be extractive and at odds with community-aligned advocacy. Drawing on interviews with 32 individuals who use design to address local, social inequities, we extend the current discourse around design activism by exploring 'activist-led design'. We outline four key considerations of this work: understanding activist-led design practices; relationality and community engagements; challenges of doing this work; and democratizing access to design. Our analysis highlights implications for academia's role in design activism. This paper interrogates design activism's role as a social and communal practice, and considers ways to support activist-led design. We propose considerations that contribute to the larger conversation of academic design having more equitable impact.

References

[1]
AIGA. 2021. Design POV: An In-Depth Look at the Design Industry Now. Technical Report. American Institute of Graphic Arts.
[2]
Sherry R. Arnstein. 1969. A Ladder Of Citizen Participation. Journal of the American Planning Association 35, 4 (1969), 216--224. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944366908977225
[3]
Mariam Asad. 2019. Prefigurative Design as a Method for Research Justice. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 3, CSCW, Article 200 (nov 2019), 18 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3359302
[4]
Mariam Asad and Christopher A. Le Dantec. 2015. Illegitimate Civic Participation: Supporting Community Activists on the Ground. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (Vancouver, BC, Canada) (CSCW '15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1694--1703. https://doi.org/10.1145/2675133.2675156
[5]
Mariam Asad and Christopher A Le Dantec. 2017. Tap the "Make This Public" Button: A Design-Based Inquiry into Issue Advocacy and Digital Civics. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 6304--6316. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3026034
[6]
Mariam Asad, Christopher A Le Dantec, Becky Nielsen, and Kate Diedrick. 2017. Creating a Sociotechnical API: Designing City-Scale Community Engagement. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2295--2306. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025963
[7]
Jennifer Attride-Stirling. 2001. Thematic networks: an analytic tool for qualitative research. Qualitative Research 1, 3 (2001), 385--405.
[8]
Madeline Balaam, Rob Comber, Rachel E. Clarke, Charles Windlin, Anna Ståhl, Kristina Höök, and Geraldine Fitzpatrick. 2019. Emotion Work in Experience-Centered Design. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Glasgow, Scotland Uk) (CHI '19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1--12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300832
[9]
Mara Balestrini, Yvonne Rogers, and Paul Marshall. 2015. Civically Engaged HCI: Tensions between Novelty and Social Impact. In Proceedings of the 2015 British HCI Conference (Lincoln, Lincolnshire, United Kingdom) (British HCI '15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 35--36. https://doi.org/10.1145/2783446.2783590
[10]
Anaelle Beignon, Emeline Brule, Jean-Baptiste Joatton, and Aurelien Tabard. 2020. Tricky Design Probes: Triggering Reflection on Design Research Methods in Service Design. In Proceedings of the 2020 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference (DIS '20). ACM, Eindhoven, Netherlands, 1647--1660.
[11]
Linda Birt, Suzanne Scott, Debbie Cavers, Christine Campbell, and Fiona Walter. 2016. Member Checking: A Tool to Enhance Trustworthiness or Merely a Nod to Validation? Qualitative Health Research 26, 13 (2016), 1802--1811. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732316654870
[12]
Susanne Bødker and Ole Sejer Iversen. 2002. Staging a professional participatory design practice: moving PD beyond the initial fascination of user involvement. In Proceedings of the Second Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (Aarhus, Denmark) (NordiCHI '02). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 11--18. https://doi.org/10.1145/572020.572023
[13]
Susanne Bødker and Morten Kyng. 2018. Participatory Design that Matters?Facing the Big Issues. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 25, 1, Article 4 (feb 2018), 31 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3152421
[14]
Kirsten Boehner, Rogério DePaula, Paul Dourish, and Phoebe Sengers. 2007. How emotion is made and measured. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 65, 4 (2007), 275--291.
[15]
Disha Bora, Hanlin Li, Sagar Salvi, and Erin Brady. 2017. ActVirtual: Making public activism accessible. In Proceedings of the 19th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (Baltimore, Maryland, USA) (ASSETS'17). Association for Computing Machinery, Inc, New Yrok, NY, 307--308. https://doi.org/10.1145/3132525.3134815
[16]
Johanna Brewer, Morgan Romine, and T.L. Taylor. 2020. Inclusion at Scale: Deploying a Community-Driven Moderation Intervention on Twitch. In DIS 2020 : proceedings of the 2020 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference. ACM, Eindhoven, Netherlands, 757--769.
[17]
Ozgur Deniz CETIN. 2016. Design activism from the past to present: A critical analysis of the discourse. 10th Conference on International Committee for Design History & Design Studies 8, 2 (2016), 388--393. https://doi.org/10.5151/desproicdhs2016-04_016
[18]
Cher Weixia Chen and Paul C Gorski. 2015. Burnout in social justice and human rights activists: Symptoms, causes and implications. Journal of Human Rights Practice 7, 3 (2015), 366--390.
[19]
Rachel Clarke, Jo Briggs, Ann Light, and Pete Wright. 2016. Situated Encounters with Socially Engaged Art in Community-Based Design. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (DIS '16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 521--532. https://doi.org/10.1145/2901790.2901882
[20]
Patricia Hill Collins. 2002. Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment. routledge, New York, NY.
[21]
Eric Corbett, Emily Denton, and Sheena Erete. 2023. Power and Public Participation in AI. In Proceedings of the 3rd ACM Conference on Equity and Access in Algorithms, Mechanisms, and Optimization (BostonMAUSA) (EAAMO '23). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 8, 13 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3617694.3623228
[22]
Eric Corbett and Christopher A Le Dantec. 2018. The Problem of Community Engagement: Disentangling the Practices of Municipal Government. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1--13. https://doi-org.cmu. idm.oclc.org/10.1145/3173574.3174148
[23]
Sasha Costanza-Chock. 2018. Design Justice: towards an intersectional feminist framework for design theory and practice. In Proceedings of the Design Research Society 2018, Vol. 2. Social Science Research Network, Limerick, 14. https://doi.org/10.21606/drs.2018.679
[24]
Jay Cunningham, Gabrielle Benabdallah, Daniela Rosner, and Alex Taylor. 2023. On the Grounds of Solutionism: Ontologies of Blackness and HCI. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 30, 2, Article 20 (apr 2023), 17 pages. https: //doi.org/10.1145/3557890
[25]
Jessa Dickinson, Mark Diaz, Christopher A Le Dantec, and Sheena Erete. 2019. "The Cavalry Ain?t Coming in to Save Us": Supporting Capacities and Relationships through Civic Tech. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 3, CSCW (nov 2019), 21 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3359225
[26]
Catherine D'Ignazio, Erhardt Graeff, Christina N. Harrington, and Daniela K. Rosner. 2020. Toward Equitable Participatory Design: Data Feminism for CSCW amidst Multiple Pandemics. In Conference Companion Publication of the 2020 on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (Virtual Event, USA) (CSCW '20 Companion). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 437--445. https://doi.org/10.1145/3406865.3418588
[27]
Carl DiSalvo and Christopher A Le Dantec. 2017. Civic Design. Interactions 24, 6 (oct 2017), 66--69. https://doi.org/ 10.1145/3137097
[28]
Sara Dolnicar, Helen Irvine, and Katie Lazarevski. 2008. Mission or money? Competitive challenges facing public sector nonprofit organisations in an institutionalised environment. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing 13, 2 (2008), 107--117.
[29]
Lynn Dombrowski, Ellie Harmon, and Sarah Fox. 2016. Social Justice-Oriented Interaction Design: Outlining Key Design Strategies and Commitments. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (DIS '16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 656--671. https://doi.org/10.1145/2901790.2901861
[30]
Joseph Donia and James A Shaw. 2021. Ethics and values in design: A structured review and theoretical critique. Science and engineering ethics 27, 5 (2021), 57.
[31]
Clara I Díaz, Tiera Lee, Andrea Lewis, Anthony Reid, Alexandra M Thomas, and Amiri Tulloch. 2022. Black Radical Imagination. https://studiomuseum.org/article/black-radical-imagination-3
[32]
Sheena Erete. 2021. Using black feminist epistemologies and activist frameworks to counter structural racism in design. interactions 28, 5 (2021), 56--59.
[33]
Sheena Erete, Yolanda Rankin, and Jakita Thomas. 2023. A method to the madness: Applying an intersectional analysis of structural oppression and power in HCI and design. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 30, 2 (2023), 1--45.
[34]
Travis Faas, Lynn Dombrowski, Alyson Young, and Andrew D. Miller. 2018. Watch Me Code: Programming Mentorship Communities on Twitch.Tv. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 2, CSCW, Article 50 (nov 2018), 18 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3274319
[35]
Daniel Fallman. 2003. Design-oriented human-computer interaction. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Ft. Lauderdale, Florida, USA) (CHI '03). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 225--232. https://doi.org/10.1145/642611.642652
[36]
Mary Flanagan and Helen Nissenbaum. 2007. A game design methodology to incorporate social activist themes. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (San Jose, California, USA) (CHI '07). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 181--190. https://doi.org/10.1145/1240624.1240654
[37]
Sarah Fox and Christopher Le Dantec. 2014. Community Historians: Scaffolding Community Engagement through Culture and Heritage. In Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (DIS'14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 785--794. https://doi.org/10.1145/2598510.2598563
[38]
Sarah Fox, Catherine Lim, Tad Hirsch, and Daniela K. Rosner. 2020. Accounting for design activism: On the positionality and politics of designerly intervention. Design Issues 36, 1 (2020), 5--18. https://doi.org/10.1162/desi_a_00571
[39]
Batya Friedman. 1996. Value-sensitive design. Interactions 3, 6 (dec 1996), 16--23. https://doi.org/10.1145/242485.242493
[40]
Alastair Fuad-Luke. 2009. Design Activism: beautiful strangeness for a sustainable world (1st ed.). Routledge, London, U.K.
[41]
Colette Gaiter. 2018. Visualizing a Black Future: Emory Douglas and the Black Panther Party. Journal of Visual Culture 17, 3 (2018), 299--311.
[42]
Sucheta Ghoshal, Andrea Grimes Parker, Christopher A Le Dantec, Carl Disalvo, Lilly Irani, and Amy Bruckman. 2019. Design and the Politics of Collaboration: A Grassroots Perspective. In Conference Companion Publication of the 2019 on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (CSCW '19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 468--473. https://doi.org/10.1145/3311957.3359438
[43]
Alejandra Gonzalez, Jessa Dickinson, Aakriti Chugh, Travis Rejman, Burrell Poe, and Sheena Erete. 2022. What Community Asset Mapping Can Teach Us about Power and Design. Interactions 29, 5 (aug 2022), 48--53. https://doi.org/10.1145/3554988
[44]
Maria Göransdotter. 2020. Transitional design histories. Ph.D. Dissertation. Umeå universitet.
[45]
Paul C Gorski and Noura Erakat. 2019. Racism, whiteness, and burnout in antiracism movements: How white racial justice activists elevate burnout in racial justice activists of color in the United States. Ethnicities 19, 5 (2019), 784--808.
[46]
Connie Guan, Anya Bouzida, Ramzy M. Oncy-avila, Sanika Moharana, and Laurel D. Riek. 2021. Taking an (Embodied) Cue From Community Health: Designing Dementia Caregiver Support Technology to Advance Health Equity. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (YokohamaJapan) (CHI '21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 655, 16 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445559
[47]
Donna J Haraway. 2016. Staying with the Trouble: Making Kin in the Chthulucene. Duke University Press, Durham, NC. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780822373780
[48]
Christina Harrington, Sheena Erete, and Anne Marie Piper. 2019. Deconstructing Community-Based Collaborative Design: Towards More Equitable Participatory Design Engagements. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 3, CSCW (nov 2019), 1--25. https://doi.org/10.1145/3359318
[49]
Christina N. Harrington, Shamika Klassen, and Yolanda A. Rankin. 2022. 'All That You Touch, You Change': Expanding the Canon of Speculative Design Towards Black Futuring. In Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (New Orleans, LA, USA) (CHI '22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 450, 10 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3502118
[50]
Sabrina Hauser, Audrey Desjardins, and Ron Wakkary. 2013. Design Activism in the HCI Classroom. Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings 2013-April (2013), 2119--2128. https://doi.org/10.1145/2468356.2468731
[51]
Gillian R. Hayes. 2011. The relationship of action research to human-computer interaction. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 18, 3 (2011), 1--20. https://doi.org/10.1145/1993060.1993065
[52]
Kelly Hayes. 2022. Hope is not a given. we must cultivate it together. https://truthout.org/audio/hope-is-not-agiven- we-must-cultivate-it-together/
[53]
Eric B. Hekler, Jennifer C. Taylor, Steven P. Dow, Michèle Morris, Faren J. Grant, Sayali S. Phatak, Don Norman, m.c. schraefel, and Dana M. Lewis. 2019. Exploring, Defining, & Advancing Community-Driven Design for Social Impact. In Companion Publication of the 2019 on Designing Interactive Systems Conference 2019 Companion (San Diego, CA, USA) (DIS '19 Companion). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 373--376. https://doi.org/10.1145/3301019.3319998
[54]
Tad Hirsch. 2009. Communities real and imagined: designing a communication system for zimbabwean activists. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Communities and Technologies (University Park, PA, USA). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 71--76. https://doi.org/10.1145/1556460.1556472
[55]
Todd Honma. 2016. From Archives to Action: Zines, Participatory Culture, and Community Engagement in Asian America. Radical Teacher 105 (Jul. 2016), 33--43. https://doi.org/10.5195/rt.2016.277
[56]
Kristina Höök. 2020. Soma Design - Intertwining Aesthetics, Ethics and Movement. In Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction (Sydney NSW, Australia) (TEI '20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1. https://doi.org/10.1145/3374920.3374964
[57]
Kristina Höök, Sara Eriksson, Marie Louise Juul Søndergaard, Marianela Ciolfi Felice, Nadia Campo Woytuk, Ozgun Kilic Afsar, Vasiliki Tsaknaki, and Anna Ståhl. 2019. Soma Design and Politics of the Body. In Proceedings of the Halfway to the Future Symposium 2019 (Nottingham, United Kingdom) (HTTF 2019). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 1, 8 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3363384.3363385
[58]
Jeff Hou. 2020. 1. What is Design Activism.
[59]
Intercepted. 2021. Hope is a discipline: Mariame kaba on dismantling the Carceral State. https://theintercept.com/ 2021/03/17/intercepted-mariame-kaba-abolitionist-organizing/
[60]
Lilly C Irani and M Six Silberman. 2013. Turkopticon: Interrupting Worker Invisibility in Amazon Mechanical Turk. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '13). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 611--620. https://doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2470742
[61]
Farnaz Irannejad Bisafar, Lina Itzel Martinez, and Andrea G. Parker. 2018. Social Computing-Driven Activism in Youth Empowerment Organizations: Challenges and Opportunities. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Montreal QC, Canada) (CHI '18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1--13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173757
[62]
Wing Shan Kan and Raul P Lejano. 2023. Relationality: The Role of Connectedness in the Social Ecology of Resilience. International journal of environmental research and public health 20, 5 (2023), 3865.
[63]
Robin DG Kelley. 2022. Freedom dreams: The black radical imagination. Beacon Press, Boston, MA.
[64]
Finn Kensing and Jeanette Blomberg. 1998. Participatory design: Issues and concerns. Computer supported cooperative work (CSCW) 7 (1998), 167--185.
[65]
Os Keyes, Josephine Hoy, and Margaret Drouhard. 2019. Human-Computer Insurrection: Notes on an Anarchist HCI. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1--13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300569
[66]
Vera Khovanskaya, Lynn Dombrowski, Ellie Harmon, Matthias Korn, Ann Light, Michael Stewart, and Amy Voida. 2018. Designing against the Status Quo. Interactions 25, 2 (feb 2018), 64--67. https://doi.org/10.1145/3178560
[67]
Lucy Kimbell. 2012. Rethinking design thinking: Part II. Design and Culture 4, 2 (2012), 129--148.
[68]
Jon Kolko. 2010. Sensemaking and framing: A theoretical reflection on perspective in design synthesis. In Design Research Society Biennial Conference Series: DRS2010 Design and Complexity. Design Research Society, Montreal, Canada, 1--9.
[69]
Yubo Kou and Colin M. Gray. 2018. "What Do You Recommend a Complete Beginner like Me to Practice?": Professional Self-Disclosure in an Online Community. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 2, CSCW, Article 94 (nov 2018), 24 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3274363
[70]
Max Krüger, Anne Weibert, Debora de Castro Leal, Dave Randall, and Volker Wulf. 2021. It Takes More Than One Hand to Clap: On the Role of 'Care' in Maintaining Design Results. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1--14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445389
[71]
Christopher Le Dantec. 2012. Participation and Publics: Supporting Community Engagement. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '12). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1351--1360. https://doi.org/10.1145/2207676.2208593
[72]
Christopher A Le Dantec. 2009. Situated Design: Toward an Understanding of Design through Social Creation and Cultural Cognition. In Proceedings of the Seventh ACM Conference on Creativity and Cognition (Creativity & Cognition '09). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 69--78. https://doi.org/10.1145/1640233.1640247
[73]
Christopher A Le Dantec. 2016. Design through Collective Action / Collective Action through Design. Interactions 24, 1 (dec 2016), 24--30. https://doi.org/10.1145/3018005
[74]
Christopher A Le Dantec, Jim E Christensen, Mark Bailey, Robert G Farrell, Jason B Ellis, Catalina M Danis, Wendy A Kellogg, and W Keith Edwards. 2010. A Tale of Two Publics: Democratizing Design at the Margins. In Proceedings of the 8th ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (DIS '10). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 11--20. https://doi.org/10.1145/1858171.1858174
[75]
Christopher A Le Dantec and Sarah Fox. 2015. Strangers at the Gate: Gaining Access, Building Rapport, and Co-Constructing Community-Based Research. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (CSCW '15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1348--1358. https://doi.org/10.1145/2675133.2675147
[76]
Debora de Castro Leal, Angelika Strohmayer, and Max Krüger. 2021. On Activism and Academia: Reflecting Together and Sharing Experiences Among Critical Friends. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1--18. https://doi.org/10. 1145/3411764.3445263
[77]
Ann Light and Yoko Akama. 2014. Structuring Future Social Relations: The Politics of Care in Participatory Practice. In Proceedings of the 13th Participatory Design Conference: Research Papers - Volume 1 (PDC '14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 151--160. https://doi.org/10.1145/2661435.2661438
[78]
Silvia Lindtner, Shaowen Bardzell, and Jeffrey Bardzell. 2016. Reconstituting the Utopian Vision of Making: HCI After Technosolutionism. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (San Jose, California, USA) (CHI '16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1390--1402. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858506
[79]
Thomas Markussen. 2013. The Disruptive Aesthetics of Design Activism: Enacting Design Between Art and Politics. Design Issues 29, 1 (apr 2013), 38--50. http://www.jstor.org/stable/24267101
[80]
Bella Martin and Bruce Hanington. 2012. Affinity Diagramming. In Universal Methods of Design: 100 Ways to Research Complex Problems, Develop Innovative Ideas, and Design Effective Solutions. Rockport Publishers, Beverly, MA, Chapter Affinity D, 12--13.
[81]
Jacob Metcalf, Emanuel Moss, and Danah Boyd. 2019. Owning ethics: Corporate logics, silicon valley, and the institutionalization of ethics. Social Research: An International Quarterly 86, 2 (2019), 449--476.
[82]
Lydia Michie, Madeline Balaam, John McCarthy, Timur Osadchiy, and Kellie Morrissey. 2018. From Her Story, to Our Story. In CHI '18 Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, Montreal, Quebec, 1--15. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173931
[83]
Michael J. Muller and Allison Druin. 2012. Participatory Design: The Third Space in Human--Computer Interaction. In The Human Computer Interaction Handbook: Fundamentals, Evolving Technologies and Emerging Applications. (3rd ed.). CRC Press, New York, New York, USA, Chapter 49, 29.
[84]
Dawn Nafus and Jamie Sherman. 2014. This one does not go up to 11: The quantified self movement as an alternative big data practice. International Journal of Communication 8, 1 (2014), 1784--1794.
[85]
Carman Neustaedter and Phoebe Sengers. 2012. Autobiographical Design in HCI Research: Designing and Learning through Use-It-Yourself. In Proceedings of the Designing Interactive Systems Conference (Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom) (DIS'12). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 514--523. https://doi.org/10.1145/2317956.2318034
[86]
Nel Noddings. 2013. Caring: A relational approach to ethics and moral education. Univ of California Press, CA.
[87]
Guity Novin. 2016. A History of Graphic Design: The Online Textbook. Blogspot. https://guity-novin.blogspot.com/2012/08/chapter-60-posters-in-social-protests.html
[88]
INCITE! Women of Color Against Violence. 2020. The revolution will not be funded: Beyond the non-profit industrial complex. Duke University Press, Durham, North Carolina.
[89]
Lucy Pei and Bonnie A. Nardi. 2019. We did it right, but it was still wrong: Toward assets-based design. In Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings. ACM, Glasgow, Scotland, 1--11. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290607.3310434
[90]
Jennifer Pierre, Roderic Crooks, Morgan Currie, Britt Paris, and Irene Pasquetto. 2021. Getting Ourselves Together: Data-centered participatory design research & epistemic burden. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Yokohama, Japan) (CHI'21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 406, 11 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445103
[91]
S Pink. 2015. Ethnography, co-design and emergence: Slow activism for sustainable design. Global Media Journal: Australian Edition 9, 2 (2015), 1--10.
[92]
Sharon Prendeville, Pandora Syperek, and Laura Santamaria. 2022. On the politics of design framing practices. Design Issues 38 (7 2022), 71--84. Issue 3. https://direct.mit.edu/desi/article/38/3/71/112097/On-the-Politics-of-Design- Framing-Practices
[93]
Christianna Silva. 2020. Black activist burnout: ?you can't do this work if you're running on empty?. https://www. npr.org/2020/08/10/896695759/black-activist-burnout-you-can-t-do-this-work-if-you-re-running-on-empty
[94]
Abhigyan Singh, Natalia Romero Herrera, HylkeWvan Dijk, David V Keyson, and Alex T Strating. 2021. Envisioning 'anthropology through design': A design interventionist approach to generate anthropological knowledge. Design Studies 76 (2021), 101014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2021.101014
[95]
Michael Smyth. 2020. The Radical Design Movement. https://speculativeedu.eu/the-radical-design-movement/
[96]
Dean Spade. 2020. Solidarity not charity: Mutual aid for mobilization and survival. Social Text 38, 1 (2020), 131--151.
[97]
Cella M Sum, Anh-Ton Tran, Jessica Lin, Rachel Kuo, Cynthia L Bennett, Christina Harrington, and Sarah E Fox. 2023. Translation as (Re)Mediation: How Ethnic Community-Based Organizations Negotiate Legitimacy. In Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Hamburg, Germany) (CHI '23). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 603, 14 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3544548.3581280
[98]
Ann Thorpe. 2011. Defining Design as Activism. Design Activism. https://designactivism.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/Thorpe-definingdesignactivism.pdf
[99]
ann thorpe. 2020. Design as Activism: to resist or to generate? Current 08: Generative Research & Social Innovation. https://current.ecuad.ca/design-as-activism-to-resist-or-to-generate
[100]
Eve Tuck. 2009. Suspending damage: A letter to communities. Harvard Educational Review 79, 3 (2009), 409--427. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.79.3.n0016675661t3n15
[101]
Christina Wasson. 2000. Ethnography in the field of design. Human organization 59, 4 (2000), 377--388.
[102]
David Gray Widder, Derrick Zhen, Laura Dabbish, and James Herbsleb. 2023. It's about power: What ethical concerns do software engineers have, and what do they (feel they can) do about them?. In Proceedings of the 2023 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (Chicago, IL, USA) (FAccT '23). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 467--479. https://doi.org/10.1145/3593013.3594012
[103]
Rua M. Williams and LouAnne E. Boyd. 2019. Prefigurative Politics and Passionate Witnessing. In Proceedings of the 21st International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (Pittsburgh, PA, USA) (ASSETS '19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 262--266. https://doi.org/10.1145/3308561.3355617
[104]
Christine T. Wolf, Mariam Asad, and Lynn S. Dombrowski. 2022. Designing within Capitalism. In Proceedings of the 2022 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference (Virtual Event, Australia) (DIS '22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 439--453. https://doi.org/10.1145/3532106.3533559
[105]
Richmond Wong. 2021. Tactics of Soft Resistance in User Experience Professionals? Values Work. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 5, CSCW2 (2021), 28.
[106]
Marisol Wong-Villacres, Aakash Gautam, Wendy Roldan, Lucy Pei, Jessa Dickinson, Azra Ismail, Betsy DiSalvo, Neha Kumar, Tammy Clegg, Sheena Erete, Emily Roden, Nithya Sambasivan, and Jason Yip. 2020. From Needs to Strengths: Operationalizing an Assets-Based Design of Technology. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 527--535. https://doi-org.ezproxy.depaul.edu/10.1145/3406865.3418594
[107]
Whitney M Young. 2017. Full remarks of Whitney M. Young Jr. AIA annual convention in Portland ... https://content.aia.org/sites/default/files/2018-04/WhitneyYoungJr_1968AIAContention_FulLSpeech.pdf

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction  Volume 8, Issue CSCW2
CSCW
November 2024
5177 pages
EISSN:2573-0142
DOI:10.1145/3703902
Issue’s Table of Contents
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution International 4.0 License.

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 08 November 2024
Published in PACMHCI Volume 8, Issue CSCW2

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. activism
  2. community-based participatory design
  3. design
  4. relationality
  5. social action research
  6. social justice

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 48
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)48
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)48
Reflects downloads up to 18 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Login options

Full Access

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media