Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
research-article

Do you know your user group? Why it is essential to put your user-requirements analysis on a broad database

Published: 01 November 2022 Publication History

Abstract

When developing a novel technological system, it is important to meet the users’ needs and expectations to ensure that the product will be accepted and applied by future users. To achieve that, a broadly based qualitative user-requirements analysis is essential. Following a user-centered design approach, a qualitative analysis was conducted to identify users’ needs and expectations for a future TV system. A prototype of the system has been developed with a focus on accessibility for deaf consumers by providing sign language via a virtual interpreter inserted into the traditional TV picture. The requirements analysis based on three different methods: the user interviews, the online questionnaire and the workshop. The statements given in the different studies handle similar topics. The respective detailed expectations by young and elder signers are mostly complementary, but partly even contrary. The results highlight the importance to set a user-requirements analysis on a broad database when developing technological systems. Only asking individual representatives of the user group and only applying individual methods would give very limited insight into users’ expectations and needs toward a technical system. To gain a detailed and representative picture for the whole community, a multimethod approach should be followed allowing for a feedback of several subgroups of the targeted population.

References

[1]
Adrian S, Hölig S, Hasebrink U, Bosse I, and Haage A Mediennutzung von Menschen mit Beeinträchtigungen. Medienbezogene Handlungen, Barrieren und Erwartungen einer heterogenen Zielgruppe Media-Perspektiven 2017 3 145-156
[2]
Barak A and Sadovsky Y Internet use and personal empowerment of hearing-impaired adolescents Comput. Hum. Behav. 2008 24 1802-1815
[3]
Bias R Nielsen J and Mack RL The pluralistic usability walkthrough: Coordinated empathies Usability inspection methods 1994 New York Wiley 63-76
[4]
Bortz J and Döring N Forschungsmethoden und Evaluation in den Sozial- und Humanwissenschaften 2016 5 Berlin Heidelberg, Springer
[5]
Bowe F Deaf and hard of hearing Americans’ instant messaging and e-mail use: a national survey Am. Ann. Deaf. 2002 147 6-10
[6]
Charmaz K Constructing Grounded Theory 2014 2 London Sage
[7]
Convention of the United Nations on the rights of persons with disabilities (2006). http://www.bmas.de/SharedDocs/Downloads/DE/PDF-Publikationen/a729-un-konvention.pdf?__blob=publicationFile Accessed 28 January 2021
[8]
Das Erste (2019) Barrierefreie Angebote im Ersten. https://www.daserste.de/specials/service/barrierefreie-angebote-ard100.html Accessed 28 January 2021
[9]
Debevc M, Kosec P, and Holzinger A Improving multimodal web accessibility for deaf people: sign language interpreter module Multimed. Tools Appl. 2011 54 181-199
[10]
Deutscher Gehörlosenbund (German Deaf Association). Gehörlosenkultur. https://www.gehoerlosen-bund.de/faq/geh%C3%B6rlosenkultur Accessed 28 January 2021.
[11]
Dey I Grounding grounded theory: Guidelines for qualitative inquiry 1999 San Diego Academic Press
[12]
Die Medienanstalten (2017) Content-Bericht. Forschung, Fakten, Trends. https://www.die-medienanstalten.de/publikationen/content-bericht?tx_news_pi1%5Bnews%5D=4621&cHash=fc8f892b7b3a86ec41a413c66f07fde7 Accessed 28 January 2021
[13]
EBU Technical-Information (2004) EBU report on Access Services—includes recommendations I44–2004, https://tech.ebu.ch/docs/i/i044.pdf Accessed 28 January 2021
[14]
German UPA Accessibility-Universal Design 2016 Report by the accessibility working group Journals by the German UPA, Vol 2
[15]
Gesetz zur Gleichstellung von Menschen mit Behinderung (2002) (Act on the Equality of Persons with Disabilities) https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/bgg/BGG.pdf Accessed 28 January 2021
[16]
Glaser B and Strauss A The Discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research 1967 Chicago Aldine
[17]
Hanson VL Sears A and Jacko JA Computing technologies for deaf and hard of hearing users Human-computer interaction handbook: fundamentals, evolving technologies and emerging applications 2009 2 Mahwah Erlbaum 885-893
[18]
Haualand H, Allen C (2009) Deaf People and Human Rights. https://www.rasit.org/files/Deaf-People-and-Human-Rights-Report.pdf Accessed 28 January 2021
[19]
HBB4ALL consortium (ed.) (2017). Sign Language Interpretation in HbbTV. http://pagines.uab.cat/hbb4all/sites/pagines.uab.cat.hbb4all/files/sign_language_interpreting_in_hbbtv.pdf Accessed 28 January 2021
[20]
ISO 9241–210 (2010) Ergonomics of human-system interaction–Part 210: Human-centered design for interactive systems
[21]
Moser C User experience design. Mit erlebniszentrierter softwareentwicklung zu produkten, die begeistern 2012 Berlin, Heidelberg Springer
[22]
Pilling D and Barrett P Text communication preferences of deaf people in the United Kingdom J. Deaf. Stud. Deaf. Educ. 2008 13 92-103
[23]
Power MR, Power D, and Horstmanshof L Deaf people communicating via SMS, TTY, relay service, fax and computers in Australia J. Deaf. Stud. Deaf. Educ. 2007 12 80-92
[24]
Quiring O Methodische Aspekte der Akzeptanzforschung bei interaktiven Medientechnologien Münchener Beiträge zur Kommunikationswissenschaft 2006
[25]
Upadrasta V, Oehme A, and Böhm S Stephanidis C, Antona M, Gao Q, and Zhou J User-centered design for accessibility in media content–sign language and virtual signer HCI International 2020–Late Breaking Papers: Universal Access and Inclusive Design. HCII 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer 2020 12426 Cham Springer
[26]
WHO (2020). Deafness and hearing loss. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/deafness-and-hearing-loss Accessed 28 January 2021
[27]
WHO. Facts about deafness. https://www.who.int/pbd/deafness/facts/en/ Accessed 28 January 2021
[28]
W3C World Wide Web Consortium (Ed.) (2018). Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.1. Technical Report, W3C Working Draft. https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG21/ Accessed 28 January 2021

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Challenges and recommendations for eHealth usability evaluation with elderly users: systematic review and case studyUniversal Access in the Information Society10.1007/s10209-022-00949-w23:1(455-474)Online publication date: 1-Mar-2024

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Universal Access in the Information Society
Universal Access in the Information Society  Volume 21, Issue 4
Nov 2022
229 pages
ISSN:1615-5289
EISSN:1615-5297
Issue’s Table of Contents

Publisher

Springer-Verlag

Berlin, Heidelberg

Publication History

Published: 01 November 2022
Accepted: 20 March 2021

Author Tags

  1. User-centered design
  2. Accessible media
  3. User requirements
  4. Signers
  5. Deaf and hard of hearing community

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Funding Sources

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 02 Oct 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Challenges and recommendations for eHealth usability evaluation with elderly users: systematic review and case studyUniversal Access in the Information Society10.1007/s10209-022-00949-w23:1(455-474)Online publication date: 1-Mar-2024

View Options

View options

Get Access

Login options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media