Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
research-article

From Lurkers to Workers: : Predicting Voluntary Contribution and Community Welfare

Published: 01 June 2020 Publication History

Abstract

In an online community, users can interact with fellow community members by voluntarily contributing to existing discussion threads or by starting new threads. In practice, however, the vast majority of a community’s users (∼90%) remain inactive (lurk), simply observing contributions made by intermittent (∼9%) and heavy (∼1%) contributors. Our research examines increases and decreases of types of user engagement in online communities, characterizing user engagement based on trace user activity or lack of activity. Some lurkers later become workers (i.e., engaged in the community), but some will not. Differentiating lurkers who can be engaged from those who cannot enables managers to anticipate and proactively direct their resources toward the users who are most likely to become or remain workers (i.e., heavy contributors), thereby promoting community welfare. Our research, based on analysis of 533,714 posts from an online diabetes community, can thus guide managerial interventions to increase online community welfare.

Abstract

In an online community, users can interact with fellow community members by voluntarily contributing to existing discussion threads or by starting new threads. In practice, however, the vast majority of a community’s users (≈90%) remain inactive (lurk), simply observing contributions made by intermittent (≈9%) and heavy (≈1%) contributors. Our research examines increases and decreases of types of user engagement in online communities using hidden Markov models. These models characterize latent states of user engagement from trace user activity or lack of activity. The resulting framework then differentiates lurkers who can later become workers (i.e., engaged in the community) from those who will not. Differentiating lurkers who can be engaged from those who cannot enables managers to anticipate and proactively direct their resources toward the users who are most likely to become or remain workers (i.e., heavy contributors), thereby promoting community welfare. Analysis of 533,714 posts from an online diabetes community shows that incorporating latent user engagement variables can significantly improve the accuracy of welfare prediction models and guide managerial interventions. Application of our framework to five additional communities of various contexts demonstrates its generalizability.

References

[1]
Adaji I, Vassileva J (2016) Toward understanding user participation in stack overflow using profile data. Spiro E, ed. Internat. Conf. Soc. Informatics (Springer, Cham, Switzerland), 3–13.
[2]
Adler PS, Kwon S-W (2002) Social capital: Prospects for a new concept. Acad. Management Rev. 27(1):17–40.
[3]
Anderson A, Huttenlocher D, Kleinberg J, Leskovec J (2013) Steering user behavior with badges. Proc. 22nd Internat. Conf. World Wide Web (ACM, New York), 95–106.
[4]
Angeletou S, Rowe M, Alani H (2011) Modelling and analysis of user behaviour in online communities. Internat. Semantic Web Conf. (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg), 35–50.
[5]
Arguello J, Butler BS, Joyce E, Kraut R, Ling KS, Rosé C, Wang X (2006) Talk to me: Foundations for successful individual-group interactions in online communities. Proc. SIGCHI Conf. Human Factors Comput. Systems (ACM, New York), 959–968.
[6]
Bagozzi RP, Dholakia UM (2006) Open source software user communities: A study of participation in linux user groups. Management Sci. 52(7):1099–1115.
[7]
Bateman PJ, Gray PH, Butler BS (2011) The impact of community commitment on participation in online communities. Inform. Systems Res. 22(4):841–854.
[8]
Beenen G, Ling K, Wang X, Chang K, Frankowski D, Resnick P, Kraut RE (2006) Using social psychology to motivate contributions to online communities. Comput.-Mediated Comm. 10(4):00.
[9]
Bernstein MS, Monroy-Hernández A, Harry D, André P, Panovich K, Vargas GG (2011) 4chan and/b: An analysis of anonymity and ephemerality in a large online community. Proc. 5th Internat. Conf. Weblogs Soc. Media, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain, 50–57.
[10]
Blei DM, Ng AY, Jordan MI (2003) Latent dirichlet allocation. J. Machine Learn. Res. 3:993–1022.
[11]
Brzozowski MJ, Sandholm T, Hogg T (2009) Effects of feedback and peer pressure on contributions to enterprise social media. Proc. ACM 2009 Internat. Conf. Supporting Group Work (ACM, New York), 61–70.
[12]
Burke M, Marlow C, Lento T (2009) Feed me: Motivating newcomer contribution in social network sites. SIGCHI Conf. Human Factors Comput. Systems (ACM, New York), 945–954.
[13]
Burtch G, Hong Y, Bapna R, Griskevicius V (2017) Stimulating online reviews by combining financial incentives and social norms. Management Sci. 64(5):2065–2082.
[14]
Byrd RH, Lu P, Nocedal J, Zhu C (1995) A limited memory algorithm for bound constrained optimization. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 16(5):1190–1208.
[15]
Cassell J, Huffaker D, Tversky D, Ferriman K (2006) The language of online leadership: Gender and youth engagement on the Internet. Developmental Psych. 42(3):436–449.
[16]
Chai S, Das S, Rao HR (2011) Factors affecting bloggers’ knowledge sharing: An investigation across gender. J. Management Inform. Systems 28(3):309–342.
[17]
Chen T, Guestrin C (2016) Xgboost: A scalable tree boosting system. Proc. 22nd ACM SIGKDD Internat. Conf. Knowledge Discovery Data Mining (ACM, New York), 785–794.
[18]
Chen W, Wei X, Zhu K (2018) Engaging voluntary contributions in online communities: A hidden Markov model. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 42(1):83–100.
[19]
Cheng J, Danescu-Niculescu-Mizil C, Leskovec J (2015) Antisocial behavior in online discussion communities. Preprint, submitted April 2, https://arxiv.org/abs/1504.00680.
[20]
Cheng R, Vassileva J (2006) Design and evaluation of an adaptive incentive mechanism for sustained educational online communities. User Model. User-Adapted Interaction 16(3–4):321–348.
[21]
Cramer M, Hayes G (2010) Acceptable use of technology in schools: Risks, policies, and promises. IEEE Pervasive Comput. 9(3):37–44.
[22]
Drenner S, Sen S, Terveen L (2008) Crafting the initial user experience to achieve community goals. Proc. 2008 ACM Conf. Recommender Systems (ACM, New York), 187–194.
[23]
Faraj S, Johnson SL (2011) Network exchange patterns in online communities. Organ. Sci. 22(6):1464–1480.
[24]
Faraj S, Jarvenpaa SL, Majchrzak A (2011) Knowledge collaboration in online communities. Organ. Sci. 22(5):1224–1239.
[25]
Faraj S, Kudaravalli S, Wasko M (2015) Leading collaboration in online communities. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 39(2):393–412.
[26]
Ferri FJ, Pudil P, Hatef M, Kittler J (1994) Comparative study of techniques for large-scale feature selection. Machine Intelligence and Pattern Recognition, vol. 16 (Elsevier, Amsterdam), 403–413.
[27]
Forte A, Bruckman A (2005) Why do people write for Wikipedia? Incentives to contribute to open–content publishing. Working paper, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta.
[28]
Friedman M, Meiselman D (1963) The relative stability of monetary velocity and the investment multiplier in the United States, 1897--1958. Brown EC, ed. Stabilization Policies (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ), 165–268.
[29]
Ghose A, Han S-P (2011) An empirical analysis of user content generation and usage behavior on the mobile Internet. Management Sci. 57(9):1671–1691.
[30]
Goes PB, Lin M, Au Yeung C-M (2014) “Popularity Effect” in user-generated content: Evidence from online product reviews. Inform. Systems Res. 25(2):222–238.
[31]
Goldstein JS, Pevehouse JC, Gerner DJ, Telhami S (2001) Reciprocity, triangularity, and cooperation in the middle east, 1979-97. J. Conflict Resolution 45(5):594–620.
[32]
Grewal R, Lilien GL, Mallapragada G (2006) Location, location, location: How network embeddedness affects project success in open source systems. Management Sci. 52(7):1043–1056.
[33]
Haines VA, Godley J, Hawe P (2011) Understanding interdisciplinary collaborations as social networks. Amer. J. Community Psych. 47(1–2):1–11.
[34]
Hay C, Meldrum R, Mann K (2010) Traditional bullying, cyber bullying, and deviance: A general strain theory approach. J. Contemporary Criminal Justice 26(2):130–147.
[35]
Healey B, Hoek J, Edwards R (2014) Posting behaviour patterns in an online smoking cessation social network: Implications for intervention design and development. PLoS One 9(9):e106603.
[36]
Hecking T, Chounta I-A, Hoppe HU (2015) Analysis of user roles and the emergence of themes in discussion forums. 2015 2nd Eur. Network Intelligence Conf. (ENIC) (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ), 114–121.
[37]
Hemetsberger A(2002) Fostering cooperation on the Internet: Social exchange processes in innovative virtual consumer communities. Adv. Consumer Res. 29:354–356.
[38]
Hew KF (2009) Determinants of success for online communities: An analysis of three communities in terms of members’ perceived professional development. Behav. Inform. Tech. 28(5):433–445.
[39]
Himelboim I, Gleave E, Smith M (2009) Discussion catalysts in online political discussions: Content importers and conversation starters. J. Comput.-Mediated Comm. 14(4):771–789.
[40]
Hochreiter S, Schmidhuber J (1997) Long short-term memory. Neural Comput. 9(8):1735–1780.
[41]
Huang J, Dasgupta A, Ghosh A, Manning J, Sanders M (2014) Superposter behavior in MOOC forums. Proc. 1st ACM Conf. Learn. Scale Conf. (ACM, New York), 117–126.
[42]
Huang Y, Singh PV, Ghose A (2015) A structural model of employee behavioral dynamics in enterprise social media. Management Sci. 61(12):2825–2844.
[43]
Huberman BA, Romero DM, Wu F (2009) Crowdsourcing, attention and productivity. J. Inform. Sci. 35(6):758–765.
[44]
Huffaker D (2010) Dimensions of leadership and social influence in online communities. Human Comm. Res. 36(4):593–617.
[45]
Hwang EH, Singh PV, Argote L (2015) Knowledge sharing in online communities: Learning to cross geographic and hierarchical boundaries. Organ. Sci. 26(6):1593–1611.
[46]
Hyndman RJ, Khandakar Y (2007) Automatic Time Series for Forecasting: The Forecast Package for R (Monash University, Department of Econometrics and Business Statistics).
[47]
Interdonato R, Pulice C, Tagarelli A (2015) Got to have faith!: The devotion algorithm for delurking in social networks. Proc. 2015 IEEE/ACM Internat. Conf. Adv. Soc. Networks Anal. Mining 2015 (ACM, New York), 314–319.
[48]
Interdonato R, Pulice C, Tagarelli A (2016) Community-based delurking in social networks. Proc. 2016 IEEE/ACM Internat. Conf. Adv. Soc. Networks Anal. Mining (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ), 263–270.
[49]
Isaacs D (2014) Social media and communication. J. Paediatric Child Health 50(6):421–422.
[50]
Janzik L, Herstatt C (2008) Innovation communities: Motivation and incentives for community members to contribute. 4th IEEE Internat. Conf. Management Innovation Tech. 2008. ICMIT 2008 (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ), 350–355.
[51]
Johnson SL, Safadi H, Faraj S (2015) The emergence of online community leadership. Inform. Systems Res. 26(1):165–187.
[52]
Joyce E, Kraut RE (2006) Predicting continued participation in newsgroups. J. Comput.-Mediated Comm. 11(3):723–747.
[53]
Kim AJ (2000) Community Building on the Web: Secret Strategies for Successful Online Communities (Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc., Boston).
[54]
Kohler T, Fueller J, Matzler K, Stieger D (2011) Co-creation in virtual worlds: The design of the user experience. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 35(3):773–788.
[55]
Kokkodis M (2018) Dynamic recommendations for sequential hiring decisions in online labor markets. Proc. 24th ACM SIGKDD Internat. Conf. Knowledge Discovery Data Mining (ACM, New York), 453–461.
[56]
Kokkodis M (2019a) Designing dynamic reputation systems for online labor markets. Working paper, Boston College, Boston.
[57]
Kokkodis M (2019b) Reputation deflation through dynamic expertise assessment in online labor markets. World Wide Web Conf. (ACM, New York), 896–905.
[58]
Kokkodis M, Ipeirotis PG (2016) Reputation transferability in online labor markets. Management Sci. 62(6):1687–1706.
[59]
Kokkodis M, Ransbotham S (2019) Asymmetric reputation spillover from agencies on digital platforms. Working paper, Boston College, Boston.
[60]
Kokkodis M, Lappas T, Kane G (2019) Direct and indirect benefits of introducing purchase verification in e-commerce platforms: Evidence from a natural experiment. Working paper, Boston College, Boston.
[61]
Koller D, Friedman N (2009) Probabilistic Graphical Models: Principles and Techniques (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).
[62]
Lampe C, Johnston E (2005) Follow the (slash) dot: Effects of feedback on new members in an online community. Proc. 2005 Internat. ACM SIGGROUP Conf. Supporting Group Work (ACM, New York), 11–20.
[63]
Lampel J, Bhalla A (2007) The role of status seeking in online communities: Giving the gift of experience. J. Comput.-Mediated Comm. 12(2):434–455.
[64]
Lave J, Wenger E (1991) Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).
[65]
Le Q, Mikolov T (2014) Distributed representations of sentences and documents. Proc. Machine Learn. Res 32(2):1188–1196.
[66]
Leimeister JM, Sidiras P, Krcmar H (2006) Exploring success factors of virtual communities: The perspectives of members and operators. J. Organ. Comput. Electronic Commerce 16(3-4):279–300.
[67]
Lin H-F, Lee G-G (2006) Determinants of success for online communities: An empirical study. Behav. Inform. Tech. 25(6):479–488.
[68]
Lu Y, Jerath K, Singh PV (2013) The emergence of opinion leaders in a networked online community: A dyadic model with time dynamics and a heuristic for fast estimation. Management Sci. 59(8):1783–1799.
[69]
Malinen S (2015) Understanding user participation in online communities: A systematic literature review of empirical studies. Comput. Human Behav. 46:228–238.
[70]
Mario C, Gould WW, Gutierrez RG, Marchenko Y (2008) An Introduction to Survival Analysis Using Stata (StataCorp LP, College Station, TX).
[71]
Millington R (2012) Buzzing Communities: How to Build Bigger, Better, and More Active Online Communities (FeverBee, London).
[72]
Molm LD, Schaefer DR, Collett JL (2007) The value of reciprocity. Soc. Psych. Quart. 70(2):199–217.
[73]
Moon JY, Sproull LS (2008) The role of feedback in managing the Internet-based volunteer work force. Inform. Systems Res. 19(4):494–515.
[74]
Murphy KP (2012) Machine Learning: A Probabilistic Perspective (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).
[75]
Nam KK, Ackerman MS, Adamic LA (2009) Questions in, knowledge in? A study of naver’s question answering community. Proc. SIGCHI Conf. Human Factors Comput. Systems (ACM, New York), 779–788.
[76]
Nonnecke B, Preece J (2001) Why lurkers lurk. AMCIS 2001 Proc., 1521–1530.
[77]
Oestreicher-Singer G, Zalmanson L (2013) Content or community? A digital business strategy for content providers in the social age. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 37(2):591–616.
[78]
Olteanu A, Weber I, Gatica-Perez D (2016) Characterizing the demographics behind the #blacklivesmatter movement. 2016 AAAI Spring Sympos Ser, 310–313.
[79]
Ozturk P, Nickerson J (2015) Paths from talk to action. 36th Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems, Fort Worth, TX, 1–18.
[80]
Pai P, Tsai H-T (2016) Reciprocity norms and information-sharing behavior in online consumption communities: An empirical investigation of antecedents and moderators. Inform. Management 53(1):38–52.
[81]
Patton DU, Eschmann RD, Butler DA (2013) Internet banging: New trends in social media, gang violence, masculinity and hip hop. Comput. Human Behav. 29(5):A54–A59.
[82]
Phang CW, Kankanhalli A, Tan BCY (2015) What motivates contributors vs. lurkers? An investigation of online feedback forums. Inform. Systems Res. 26(4):773–792.
[83]
Preece J (2001) Online communities: Usability, sociability, theory and methods. Earnshaw R, Guedj R, Van Dam A, Vince J, eds. Frontiers of Human-Centered Computing, Online Communities and Virtual Environments (Springer-Verlag, London), 263–277.
[84]
Preece J, Shneiderman B (2009) The reader-to-leader framework: Motivating technology-mediated social participation. AIS Trans. Human-Comput. Interaction 1(1):13–32.
[85]
Ransbotham S, Kane GC, Lurie NH (2012) Network characteristics and the value of collaborative user-generated content. Marketing Sci. 31(3):387–405.
[86]
Ransbotham S, Lurie NH, Liu H (2019) Creation and consumption of mobile word of mouth: How are mobile reviews different? Marketing Sci. 38(5):773–792.
[87]
Ransbotham S, Fichman RG, Gopal R, Gupta A (2016) Ubiquitous it and digital vulnerabilities. Inform. Systems Res. 27(4):834–847.
[88]
Ray S, Kim SS, Morris JG (2014) The central role of engagement in online communities. Inform. Systems Res. 25(3):528–546.
[89]
Reagans R, McEvily B (2003) Network structure and knowledge transfer: The effects of cohesion and range. Admin. Sci. Quart. 48(2):240–267.
[90]
Ren Y, Harper FM, Drenner S, Terveen LG, Kiesler SB, Riedl J, Kraut RE (2012) Building member attachment in online communities: Applying theories of group identity and interpersonal bonds. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 36(3):841–864.
[91]
Ridings C, Gefen D, Arinze B (2006) Psychological barriers: Lurker and poster motivation and behavior in online communities. Comm. Assoc. Inform. Systems 18(1):Article 16.
[92]
Saltz JS, Hiltz SR, Turoff M, Passerini K (2007) Increasing participation in distance learning courses. IEEE Internet Comput. 11(3):36–44.
[93]
Sapankevych NI, Sankar R (2009) Time series prediction using support vector machines: A survey. IEEE Comput. Intelligence Magazine 4(2):24–38.
[94]
Schneider A, Von Krogh G, JäGer P (2013) “Whats coming next?” Epistemic curiosity and lurking behavior in online communities. Comput. Human Behav. 29(1):293–303.
[95]
Schwarz G (1978) Estimating the dimension of a model. Ann. Statist. 6(2):461–464.
[96]
Seraj M (2012) We create, we connect, we respect, therefore we are: Intellectual, social, and cultural value in online communities. J. Interactive Marketing 26(4):209–222.
[97]
Shen KN, Khalifa M (2007) Exploring multi-dimensional conceptualization of social presence in the context of online communities. Jacko JA, ed. Internat. Conf. Human-Comput. Interaction (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg), 999–1008.
[98]
Shevade SK, Keerthi SS, Bhattacharyya C, Murthy KRK (2000) Improvements to the SMO algorithm for SVM regression. IEEE Trans. Neural Networks 11(5):1188–1193.
[99]
Shriver SK, Nair HS, Hofstetter R (2013) Social ties and user-generated content: Evidence from an online social network. Management Sci. 59(6):1425–1443.
[100]
Sun N, Rau PP-L, Ma L (2014) Understanding lurkers in online communities: A literature review. Comput. Human Behav. 38:110–117.
[101]
Szmigin I, Canning L, Reppel AE (2005) Online community: Enhancing the relationship marketing concept through customer bonding. Internat. J. Service Indust. Management 16(5):480–496.
[102]
Tagarelli A, Interdonato R (2013) Who’s out there?: Identifying and ranking lurkers in social networks. Proc. 2013 IEEE/ACM Internat. Conf. Adv. Soc. Networks Anal. Mining (ACM, New York), 215–222.
[103]
Tagarelli A, Interdonato R (2014) Lurking in social networks: Topology-based analysis and ranking methods. Soc. Network Analysis Mining 4(1):230.
[104]
Tagarelli A, Interdonato R (2015) Time-aware analysis and ranking of lurkers in social networks. Soc. Network Analysis Mining 5(1):46.
[105]
Tsai H-T, Bagozzi RP (2014) Contribution behavior in virtual communities: Cognitive, emotional, and social influences. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 38(1):143–163.
[106]
Van Mierlo T (2014) The 1% rule in four digital health social networks: An observational study. J. Medical Internet Res. 16(2):e33.
[107]
Viégas FB, Smith M (2004) Newsgroup crowds and authorlines: Visualizing the activity of individuals in conversational cyberspaces. Proc. 37th Annual Hawaii Internat. Conf. System Sci. 2004 (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ).
[108]
Wang Y, Fesenmaier DR (2003) Assessing motivation of contribution in online communities: An empirical investigation of an online travel community. Electronic Marketing 13(1):33–45.
[109]
Wasko MM, Faraj S (2005) Why should I share? Examining social capital and knowledge contribution in electronic networks of practice. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 29(1):35–57.
[110]
Wiertz C, de Ruyter K (2007) Beyond the call of duty: Why customers contribute to firm-hosted commercial online communities. Organ. Stud. 28(3):347–376.
[111]
Wikipedia. List of virtual communities with more than 1 million users. Accessed October 24, 2018, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_virtual_communities_with_more_than_1_million_users.
[112]
Willard NE (2007) Cyberbullying and Cyberthreats: Responding to the Challenge of Online Social Aggression, Threats, and Distress (Research Press, Champaign, IL).
[113]
Wise K, Hamman B, Thorson K (2006) Moderation, response rate, and message interactivity: Features of online communities and their effects on intent to participate. J. Comput.-Mediated Comm. 12(1):24–41.
[114]
Wu M (2018) The 90-9-1 rule in reality. Lithium technologies (online). Accessed October 24, 2018, https://lithosphere.lithium.com/t5/Science-of-Social-Blog/The-90-9-1-Rule-in-Reality/ba-p/5463.
[115]
XGBoost (2018) Scalable and flexible gradient boosting. Accessed August 24, 2019, https://xgboost.ai/.
[116]
Yoo Y, Alavi M (2004) Emergent leadership in virtual teams: What do emergent leaders do? Inform. Organ. 14(1):27–58.
[117]
Zeng X, Wei L (2013) Social ties and user content generation: Evidence from flickr. Inform. Systems Res. 24(1):71–87.
[118]
Zhang W, Watts SA (2008) Capitalizing on content: Information adoption in two online communities. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 9(2):Article 3.

Cited By

View all

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Information Systems Research
Information Systems Research  Volume 31, Issue 2
June 2020
362 pages
ISSN:1526-5536
DOI:10.1287/isre.2020.31.issue-2
Issue’s Table of Contents

Publisher

INFORMS

Linthicum, MD, United States

Publication History

Published: 01 June 2020
Accepted: 25 September 2019
Received: 05 April 2017

Author Tags

  1. online communities
  2. welfare of online communities
  3. voluntary online work
  4. predictive modeling

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 13 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Talk more about yourself: a data-driven extended theory of reasoned action for online health communitiesInformation Technology and Management10.1007/s10799-022-00376-625:3(233-246)Online publication date: 1-Sep-2024
  • (2023)The Good, the Bad, and the UnhirableManagement Science10.1287/mnsc.2023.469069:11(6969-6987)Online publication date: 8-Mar-2023
  • (2023)sDTMInformation Systems Research10.1287/isre.2022.112434:1(137-156)Online publication date: 1-Mar-2023
  • (2022)What Questions Are You Inclined to Answer? Effects of Hierarchy in Corporate Q&A CommunitiesInformation Systems Research10.1287/isre.2021.105233:1(244-264)Online publication date: 1-Mar-2022
  • (2021)Dynamic, Multidimensional, and Skillset-Specific Reputation Systems for Online WorkInformation Systems Research10.1287/isre.2020.097232:3(688-712)Online publication date: 1-Sep-2021

View Options

View options

Get Access

Login options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media