Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
article

Understanding lurkers in online communities: A literature review

Published: 01 September 2014 Publication History

Abstract

In internet culture, lurkers are a special group of website users who regularly login to online communities but seldom post. This study aims to provide an overall understanding of lurkers by explaining the definition of lurkers, discussing the reasons for lurking and providing suggestions on de-lurking. To understand the reason for lurking, this study first explains why people participate in online communities by building an integrated model of motivational factors of online behaviors. This model classifies motivational factors into four categories: the nature of the online community, individual characteristics, the degree of commitment and quality requirement. Based on this model, four types of lurking reasons are identified: environmental influence, personal preference, individual-group relationship and security consideration. Finally, several strategies for motivating participation in online communities are provided, including external stimuli, improved user-friendliness, encouragement of participation and guidance for newcomers.

References

[1]
Social network use and personality. Computers in Human Behavior. v26 i6. 1289-1295.
[2]
Motivation and barriers to participation in virtual knowledge-sharing communities of practice. Journal of Knowledge Management. v7 i1. 64-77.
[3]
What is the 1% rule?. In: The guardian, Guardian News and Media, UK.
[4]
Bateman, P.J., Gray, P.H., & Butler, B.S. (2006). Community commitment: How affect, obligation, and necessity drive online behaviors. In ICIS (p. 63).
[5]
Learning or lurking?: Tracking the "invisible" online student. The Internet and Higher Education. v5 i2. 147-155.
[6]
Increasing participation in online communities: A framework for human-computer interaction. Computers in Human Behavior. v23 i4. 1881-1893.
[7]
Communication networks and collective action. In: Liebrand, W.B.G., Messick, D.M., Wilke, H.A.M. (Eds.), Social dilemmas: Theoretical issues and research findings. International series in experimental social psychology, Vol. vii. Pergamon Press, Elmsford, NY, US. pp. 225-245.
[8]
Narcissism and social networking web sites. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. v34 i10. 1303-1314.
[9]
Narcissism on facebook: Self-promotional and anti-social behavior. Personality and Individual Differences. v52 i4. 482-486.
[10]
Passive forum behaviors (lurking): A community perspective. In: Proceedings of the 6th international conference on learning sciences, International Society of the Learning Sciences. pp. 128-135.
[11]
What's mine is ours, or is it? A study of attitudes about information sharing. Information Systems Research. v5 i4. 400-421.
[12]
Working knowledge: How organizations manage what they know. Harvard Business Press.
[13]
Du, Y. (2006). Modeling the behavior of lurkers in online communities using intentional agents. In Computational intelligence for modelling, control and automation, 2006 and international conference on intelligent agents, web technologies and internet commerce, international conference on (pp. 60-60): IEEE.
[14]
Lurking: An underestimated human-computer phenomenon. Multimedia, IEEE. v12 i4. 70-75.
[15]
Reviewing the definitions of "Lurkers" and some implications for online research. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking. v16 i9. 645-649.
[16]
Fan, Y.-W., Wu, C.-C., & Chiang, L.-C. (2009). Knowledge sharing in virtual community: The comparison between contributors and lurkers. In The 9th international conference on electronic business. Macau (pp. 662-668).
[17]
Ganley, D., Moser, C., & Groenewegen, P. (2012). Categorizing behavior in online communities: A look into the world of cake bakers. In System science (HICSS), 2012 45th Hawaii international conference on (pp. 3457-3466): IEEE.
[18]
Garas, A., Garcia, D., Skowron, M., & Schweitzer, F. (2012). Emotional persistence in online chatting communities. Scientific Reports, 2.
[19]
Social roles in electronic communities. Internet Research. v5. 19-22.
[20]
Han, J.J., Zheng, R.J., & Xu, Y. (2007). The effect of individual needs, trust and identification in explaining participation intentions in virtual communities. In System sciences, 2007. HICSS 2007. 40th Annual Hawaii international conference on (pp. 179c-179c): IEEE.
[21]
Social and psychological determinants of levels of engagement with an online breast cancer support group: Posters, lurkers, and nonusers. Journal of Health Communication. v17 i3. 356-371.
[22]
Encouraging contributions in learning networks using incentive mechanisms. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning. v21 i5. 355-365.
[23]
Kollock, P. (1999). The economies ol online cooperation. Communities in cyberspace, 220.
[24]
Kollock, P., & Smith, M. (1996). Managing the virtual commons. Computer-mediated communication: Linguistic, social, and cross-cultural perspectives, 109-128.
[25]
Private traits and attributes are predictable from digital records of human behavior. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. v110 i15. 5802-5805.
[26]
Lurking in online asynchronous discussion. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences. v2 i2. 2260-2263.
[27]
How open source software works: "Free" user-to-user assistance. Research Policy. v32 i6. 923-943.
[28]
. Learners, learning and assessment, 1999.The Open University, London.
[29]
Lurking as participation: A community perspective on lurkers' identity and negotiability. In: Proceedings of the 7th international conference on learning sciences, International Society of the Learning Sciences. pp. 404-410.
[30]
Posters, lurkers, and in between: A multidimensional model of online community participation patterns. In: Salvendy, G. (Ed.), Proceedings of the 11th HIC international conference, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc., Las Ve-gas.
[31]
Intention to adopt knowledge through virtual communities: Posters vs lurkers. Online Information Review. v36 i3. 442-461.
[32]
MacDonald, J., Atkin, W., Daugherity, F., Fox, H., MacGillivray, A., Reeves-Lipscomb, D., et al. (2004). Let's get more positive about the term 'lurker'. In CPsquare foundations of communities of practice workshop.
[33]
Mason, B. (1999). Issues in virtual ethnography. Ethnographic studies in real and virtual environments: Inhabited information spaces and connected communities, 61-69.
[34]
A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human Resource Management Review. v1 i1. 61-89.
[35]
The influence of personality on Facebook usage, wall postings, and regret. Computers in Human Behavior. v28 i1. 267-274.
[36]
The internet as mass medium. Journal of Communication. v46 i1. 39-50.
[37]
Lurking as personal trait or situational disposition: Lurking and contributing in enterprise social media. In: Proceedings of the ACM 2012 conference on computer supported cooperative work, ACM. pp. 253-256.
[38]
Make new friends or keep the old: Gender and personality differences in social networking use. Computers in Human Behavior. v28 i1. 107-112.
[39]
Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review. v23 i2. 242-266.
[40]
Lurking: A challenge or a fruitful strategy? A comparison between lurkers and active participants in an online corporate community of practice. International Journal of Knowledge and Learning. v6 i4. 269-284.
[41]
Nielsen, J. (2011). Participation inequality: Encouraging more users to contribute, 2006. <http://www.useit.com/alertbox/participation_inequality.html> (1.03.12).
[42]
Lurking in email-based discussion lists. South Bank University.
[43]
Nonnecke, B., & Preece, J. (2001). Why lurkers lurk. In Americas conference on information systems (pp. 1-10).
[44]
Non-public and public online community participation: Needs, attitudes and behavior. Electronic Commerce Research. v6 i1. 7-20.
[45]
Lurker demographics: Counting the silent. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, ACM. pp. 73-80.
[46]
Nonnecke, B., Preece, J., Andrews, D., & Voutour, R. (2004). Online lurkers tell why. In AMCIS (p. 321).
[47]
Nonnecke, B., Preece, J., & Andrews, D. (2004). What lurkers and posters think of each other. In Proceedings of the 37th annual Hawaii international conference (pp. 195-203): Citeseer.
[48]
Learning from notes: Organizational issues in groupware implementation. The Information Society. v9 i3. 237-250.
[49]
Collective identity and social movements. Annual Review of Sociology. v27. 283-305.
[50]
Relationship between the level of intimacy and lurking in online social network services. Computers in Human Behavior. v24 i6. 2757-2770.
[51]
The virtual community: Homesteading on the electronic frontier. MIT Press.
[52]
Personality and motivations associated with Facebook use. Computers in Human Behavior. v25 i2. 578-586.
[53]
"What's coming next?" Epistemic curiosity and lurking behavior in online communities. Computers in Human Behavior. v29 i1. 293-303.
[54]
The behavior of organisms: An experimental analysis. Appleton-Century, Oxford, England.
[55]
Swartz, A. (2006). Raw thought: Who writes Wikipedia. Blog article. <http://www.aaronsw.com/weblog/whowriteswikipedia> Published, 4.
[56]
Takahashi, M., Fujimoto, M., & Yamasaki, N. (2007). Active lurking: Enhancing the value of in-house online communities through the related practices around the online communities.
[57]
The active lurker: Influence of an in-house online community on its outside environment. In: Proceedings of the 2003 international ACM SIGGROUP conference on supporting group work, ACM. pp. 1-10.
[58]
Tedjamulia, S.J., Dean, D.L., Olsen, D.R., & Albrecht, C.C. (2005). Motivating content contributions to online communities: Toward a more comprehensive theory. In System sciences, 2005. HICSS'05. Proceedings of the 38th annual Hawaii international conference on (pp. 193b-193b): IEEE.
[59]
. The social psychology of groups, 1959.John Wiley, Oxford, England.
[60]
It is all about being popular: The effects of need for popularity on social network site use. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking. v15 i1. 37-42.
[61]
The 1% rule in four digital health social networks: An observational study. Journal of Medical Internet Research. v16 i2.
[62]
Walker, B., Redmond, J., & Lengyel, A. (2013). Are they all the same? Lurkers and posters on the net. eCULTURE, 3(1).
[63]
Who is concerned about what? A study of American, Chinese and Indian users' privacy concerns on social network sites. In: Trust and trustworthy computing, Springer. pp. 146-153.
[64]
Showing off? Human mobility and the interplay of traits, self-disclosure, and facebook check-ins. Social Science Computer Review. v31 i4. 437-457.
[65]
Net surfers don't ride alone: Virtual communities as communities. Networks in the Global Village. 331-366.
[66]
Wichmand, M., & Jensen, S.S. (2012). Small is beautiful-lurkers engaging through micro-contributions. In 4th European communication conference.
[67]
Willett, J. (1998). VECO-an online community making a difference, an evaluation of the project. In: Australian student traineeship foundation and dusseldorp skills forum, Sydney.
[68]
Moderation, response rate, and message interactivity: Features of online communities and their effects on intent to participate. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication. v12 i1. 24-41.
[69]
Zhang, Z. (2010). Feeling the sense of community in social networking usage. Engineering management, IEEE transactions on, 57(2), 225-239.
[70]
Zhang, W., & Storck, J. (2001). Peripheral members in online communities. In Proceedings of AMCIS 2001 the Americas conference on information systems (p. 7).
[71]
Understanding online community user participation: A social influence perspective. Internet Research. v21 i1. 67-81.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Exploring the Effects of Grouping by Programming Experience in Q&A ForumsProceedings of the 2024 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research - Volume 110.1145/3632620.3671107(206-221)Online publication date: 12-Aug-2024
  • (2024)Using and Appropriating Technology to Support The Menopause Journey in the UKProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642694(1-14)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
  • (2024)How self-disclosure builds cancer communities through authentic stories on YouTubeComputers in Human Behavior10.1016/j.chb.2024.108226156:COnline publication date: 9-Jul-2024
  • Show More Cited By
  1. Understanding lurkers in online communities: A literature review

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image Computers in Human Behavior
    Computers in Human Behavior  Volume 38, Issue
    September, 2014
    381 pages

    Publisher

    Elsevier Science Publishers B. V.

    Netherlands

    Publication History

    Published: 01 September 2014

    Author Tags

    1. De-lurking strategy
    2. Lurker
    3. Lurking reason
    4. Motivational factor
    5. Online community

    Qualifiers

    • Article

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
    Reflects downloads up to 13 Nov 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)Exploring the Effects of Grouping by Programming Experience in Q&A ForumsProceedings of the 2024 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research - Volume 110.1145/3632620.3671107(206-221)Online publication date: 12-Aug-2024
    • (2024)Using and Appropriating Technology to Support The Menopause Journey in the UKProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642694(1-14)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
    • (2024)How self-disclosure builds cancer communities through authentic stories on YouTubeComputers in Human Behavior10.1016/j.chb.2024.108226156:COnline publication date: 9-Jul-2024
    • (2024)An investigation of the social media overload and academic performanceEducation and Information Technologies10.1007/s10639-023-12213-629:8(10303-10328)Online publication date: 1-Jun-2024
    • (2024)Motivational Dynamics and Platform Design in Online Communities of Teachers: A Multi-case StudyCollaboration Technologies and Social Computing10.1007/978-3-031-67998-8_3(29-44)Online publication date: 11-Sep-2024
    • (2024)Social Network Structure and Lurker OriginsHuman Interface and the Management of Information10.1007/978-3-031-60125-5_25(366-381)Online publication date: 29-Jun-2024
    • (2023)Student Usage of Q&A Forums: Signs of Discomfort?Proceedings of the 2023 Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education V. 110.1145/3587102.3588842(33-39)Online publication date: 29-Jun-2023
    • (2023)Understanding Disclosure and Support for Youth Mental Health in Social Music CommunitiesProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/35796297:CSCW1(1-32)Online publication date: 16-Apr-2023
    • (2023)Compass: Supporting Large Group Mentorship in a Chat-Based UIProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/35794707:CSCW1(1-25)Online publication date: 16-Apr-2023
    • (2023)“I See Me Here”: Mental Health Content, Community, and Algorithmic Curation on TikTokProceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3544548.3581489(1-17)Online publication date: 19-Apr-2023
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    View options

    Get Access

    Login options

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media