A Buddhist Mindfulness View of Paradox: : Silence and Skepticism of Language to Dismantle Paradoxes
Abstract
This study explores how Buddhist mindfulness as a self-reflective practice helps individuals respond to a paradox and ultimately dismantle it. To deeply immerse myself into this context, I conducted a nine-month ethnographic fieldwork in three Korean Buddhist temples that confront the paradox between the need for financial resources and spiritual values that disavow money. The findings show a series of cognitive mechanisms that reveal multiple roles of mindfulness, manifested as silence and skepticism of language. First, the monastic environment enables monks to become familiar with a life of silence that turns their attention to the inner mind from the external-empirical world. The silence serves as a mental buffer when monks switch between their sacred role and their business role. Over time, deep silence directs them to skepticism of language that triggers doubt on preexisting linguistic categories, boundaries, and separations. When the preexisting linguistic categories finally disappear in their mind, monks no longer rely on any differentiating or integrating tactic to navigate their paradox. In other words, they no longer perceive a paradox, which means the paradox has disappeared from their life. These cognitive mechanisms construct the monks’ worldview on contradictions, conflicts, and dualities, leading them from the experience of paradox to a unique mental state, the nonexperience of paradox. Integrating this mental state and the worldview of Buddhist monks with paradox research, this study theorizes a Buddhist mindfulness view of paradox.
Funding: This work was supported by Chulalongkorn University.
References
[1]
Andriopoulos C, Lewis MW (2009) Exploitation-exploration tensions and organizational ambidexterity: Managing paradoxes of innovation. Organ. Sci. 20(4):696–717.
[2]
Ashforth BE, Kreiner GE, Fugate M (2000) All in a day’s work: Boundaries and micro role transitions. Acad. Management Rev. 25:472–491.
[3]
Astley WG (1985) The two ecologies: Population and community perspectives on organizational evolution. Admin. Sci. Quart. 30(2):224–241.
[4]
Bednarek R, Paroutis S, Sillince J (2017) Transcendence through rhetorical practices: Responding to paradox in the science sector. Organ. Stud. 38(1):77–101.
[5]
Besharov ML (2014) The relational ecology of identification: How organizational identification emerges when individuals hold divergent values. Acad. Management J. 57(5):1485–1512.
[6]
Chen MJ (2002) Transcending paradox: The Chinese “middle way” perspective. Asia Pacific J. Management 19:179–199.
[7]
Chia R, Nayak A (2017) Circumventing the logic and limits of representation: Otherness in East–West approaches to paradox. Smith WK, Lewis MW, Jarzabkowski P, Langley A, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Organizational Paradox (Oxford University Press, Oxford), 125–140.
[8]
Choi E, Leroy H (2015) Methods of mindfulness: How mindfulness is studied in the workplace. Reb J, Atkins PWB, eds. Mindfulness in Organizations (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 67–99.
[9]
Cornelissen JP (2020) Corporate Communication: A Guide to Theory and Practice (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA).
[10]
Cornelissen JP, Holt R, Zundel M (2011) The role of analogy and metaphor in the framing and legitimization of strategic change. Organ. Stud. 32(12):1701–1716.
[11]
Creswell JD (2017) Mindfulness interventions. Annual Rev. Psych. 68:491–516.
[12]
Cunha MPE, Putnam LL (2019) Paradox theory and the paradox of success. Strategic Organ. 17:95–106.
[13]
Dameron S, Torset C (2014) The discursive construction of strategists’ subjectivities: Toward a paradox lens on strategy. J. Management Stud. 51(2):291–319.
[14]
Deguchi Y, Garfield JL, Priest G, Sharf RH (2021) What Can’t Be Said: Paradox and Contradiction in East Asian Thought (Oxford University Press, London).
[15]
de Saussure F (2011) Course in General Linguistics (Columbia University Press, New York).
[16]
Dorjee D (2016) Defining contemplative science: The metacognitive self-regulatory capacity of the mind, context of meditation practice and modes of existential awareness. Front. Psych. 7:1788.
[17]
Dunne J (2011) Toward an understanding of non-dual mindfulness. Contemporary Buddhism 12(1):71–88.
[18]
Edwards JR, Rothbard NP (2000) Mechanisms linking work and family: Clarifying the relationship between work and family constructs. Acad. Management Rev. 25:178–199.
[19]
El-Sawad A, Arnold J, Cohen L (2004) “Doublethink”: The prevalence and function of contradiction in accounts of organizational life. Human Relat. 57:1179–1203.
[20]
Elias N (1978) Mennell S, Morrissey G (trans.), What Is Sociology? (Columbia University Press, New York).
[21]
Etikan I, Musa SA, Alkassim RS (2016) Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. Amer. J. Theor. Appl. Statist. 5(1):1–4.
[22]
Fairhurst GT, Putnam L (2004) Organizations as discursive constructions. Commun. Theory 14(1):5–26.
[23]
Falzon M-A (2009) Introduction. Falzon M-A, ed. Multi-Sited Ethnography: Theory, Praxis and Locality in Contemporary Research (Ashgate, Surrey, UK), 1–23.
[24]
Fang T (2012) Yin Yang: A new perspective on culture. Management Organ. Rev. 8:25–50.
[25]
Farjoun M (2010) Beyond dualism: Stability and change as a duality. Acad. Management Rev. 35(2):202–225.
[26]
Ferraro F, Pfeffer J, Sutton RI (2005) Economics language and assumptions: How theories can become self-fulfilling. Acad. Management Rev. 30(1):8–24.
[27]
Fiol CM, Pratt MG, O’Connor EJ (2009) Managing intractable identity conflicts. Acad. Management Rev. 34(1):32–55.
[28]
Gelles D (2015) Mindful Work: How Meditation Is Changing Business from the Inside Out (Eamon Dolan, Boston).
[29]
Gioia DA, Chittipeddi K (1991) Sensemaking and sensegiving in strategic change initiation. Strategic Management J. 12(6):433–448.
[30]
Good DJ, Lyddy CJ, Glomb TM, Bono JE, Brown KW, Duffy MK, Baer RA, Brewer JA, Lazar SW (2016) Contemplating mindfulness at work: An integrative review. J. Management 42(1):114–142.
[31]
Grimmer J, Roberts ME, Stewart BM (2021) Machine learning for social science: An agnostic approach. Annual Rev. Political Sci. 24:395–419.
[32]
Grint K (2010) The sacred in leadership: Separation, sacrifice and silence. Organ. Stud. 31(1):89–107.
[33]
Grodal S, Anteby M, Holm AL (2021) Achieving rigor in qualitative analysis: The role of active categorization in theory building. Acad. Management Rev. 46(3):591–612.
[34]
Guba E, Lincoln Y (1994) Competing paradigms in qualitative research. Denzin NK, Lincoln YS, eds. Handbook of Qualitative Research (Sage, London), 105–117.
[35]
Gümüsay AA, Smets M, Morris T (2020) “God at work”: Engaging central and incompatible institutional logics through elastic hybridity. Acad. Management J. 63:124–154.
[36]
Gunaratana BH (2002) Mindfulness in Plain English (Wisdom, Boston).
[37]
Hahn T, Pinkse J, Preuss L, Figge F (2014) Cognitive frames in corporate sustainability: Managerial sensemaking with paradoxical and business case frames. Acad. Management Rev. 39:463–487.
[38]
Hällgren M, Rouleau L, De Rond M (2018) A matter of life or death: How extreme context research matters for management and organization studies. Acad. Management Ann. 12(1):111–153.
[39]
Hanh TN (2015) Silence: The Power of Quiet in a World Full of Noise (HarperCollins, New York).
[40]
Harvey J, Crowley J, Woszidlo A (2019) Mindfulness, conflict strategy use, and relational satisfaction: A dyadic investigation. Mindfulness 10(4):749–758.
[41]
Helfat CE, Winter SG (2011) Untangling dynamic and operational capabilities: Strategy for the (N) ever‐changing world. Strategic Management J. 32:1243–1250.
[42]
Herrigel E, Tausend H (1948) Zen in der Kunst des Bogenschießens, Jeong C-H (trans.). (Sam-Woo-Bhan, Seoul, Republic of Korea).
[43]
Hölzel BK, Lazar SW, Gard T, Schuman-Olivier Z, Vago DR, Ott U (2011) How does mindfulness meditation work? Proposing mechanisms of action from a conceptual and neural perspective. Perspect. Psych. Sci. 6(6):537–559.
[44]
Hopkins J (1999) Emptiness in the Mind-only School of Buddhism (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA).
[45]
Husgafvel V (2018) The “universal dharma foundation” of mindfulness-based stress reduction: Non-duality and Mahāyāna Buddhist influences in the work of Jon Kabat-Zinn. Contemp. Buddhism 19:275–326.
[46]
Huszár O (2016) The role of silence at the retreats of a Buddhist community. KOME 4(2):59–73.
[47]
Hyun-Eung V (2017) Hong C-S, Yu S-K (trans.), Enlightenment and History: Theory and Praxis in Contemporary Buddhism (Bulkwang Publishing, Seoul, Korea).
[48]
Inamori K (1995) A Passion for Success: Practical, Inspirational, and Spiritual Insight from Japan’s Leading Entrepreneur (McGraw-Hill, New York).
[49]
Inamori K (2010) A Compass to Fulfillment: Passion and Spirituality in Life and Business (McGraw-Hill, New York).
[50]
Jankowski T, Holas P (2014) Metacognitive model of mindfulness. Conscious. Cogn. 28:64–80.
[51]
Jarzabkowski P, Lê JK (2017) We have to do this and that? You must be joking: Constructing and responding to paradox through humor. Organ. Stud. 38:433–462.
[52]
Jarzabkowski P, Sillince J (2007) A rhetoric-in-context approach to building commitment to multiple strategic goals. Organ. Stud. 28:1639–1665.
[53]
Jay J (2013) Navigating paradox as a mechanism of change and innovation in hybrid organizations. Acad. Management J. 56(1):137–159.
[54]
Johnson DC, Thom NJ, Stanley EA, Haase L, Simmons AN, Shih PA, Thompson WK, Potterat EG, Minor TR, Paulus MP (2014) Modifying resilience mechanisms in at-risk individuals: A controlled study of mindfulness training in Marines preparing for deployment. Amer. J. Psychiatry 171(8):844–853.
[55]
Kabat-Zinn J (1982) An outpatient program in behavioral medicine for chronic pain patients based on the practice of mindfulness meditation: Theoretical considerations and preliminary results. Gen. Hosp. Psychiatry 4(1):33–47.
[56]
Kabat-Zinn J (2003) Mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR). Constr. Human Sci. 8(2):73–83.
[57]
Kay AA, Skarlicki DP (2020) Cultivating a conflict-positive workplace: How mindfulness facilitates constructive conflict management. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 159:8–20.
[58]
Keller J, Chen EW (2017) A road map of the paradoxical mind. Smith WK, Lewis MW, Jarzabkowski P, Langley A, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Organizational Paradox (Oxford University Press, Oxford), 66–86.
[59]
Keller J, Sadler‐Smith E (2019) Paradoxes and dual processes: A review and synthesis. Internat. J. Management Rev. 21(2):162–184.
[60]
Keller J, Loewenstein J, Yan J (2017) Culture, conditions and paradoxical frames. Organ. Stud. 38(3–4):539–560.
[61]
Keown D (1991) The Nature of Buddhist Ethics (Macmillan, New York).
[62]
Kudesia RS, Nyima VT (2015) Mindfulness contextualized: An integration of Buddhist and neuropsychological approaches to cognition. Mindfulness 6(4):910–925.
[63]
Langer EJ (1989) Mindfulness (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA).
[64]
Langer EJ (2014) Mindfulness forward and back. Le A, Ngnoumen CT, Langer EJ, eds. The Wiley Blackwell Handbook of Mindfulness (Wiley, Chichester, UK), 7–20.
[65]
Langer EJ, Moldoveanu M (2000) The construct of mindfulness. J. Soc. Issues 56(1):1–9.
[66]
Langer EJ, Blank A, Chanowitz B (1978) The mindlessness of ostensibly thoughtful action: The role of “placebic” information in interpersonal interaction. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 36(6):635–642.
[67]
Langley A (1999) Strategies for theorizing from process data. Acad. Management Rev. 24:691–710.
[68]
Lant TK, Shapira Z (2001) Organizational Cognition: Computation and Interpretation (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ).
[69]
Laureiro‐Martínez D, Brusoni S, Canessa N, Zollo M (2015) Understanding the exploration–exploitation dilemma: An fMRI study of attention control and decision‐making performance. Strategic Management J. 36(3):319–338.
[70]
Lavie D, Stettner U, Tushman ML (2010) Exploration and exploitation within and across organizations. Acad. Management Ann. 4(1):109–155.
[71]
Leung AKY, Liou S, Miron-Spektor E, Koh B, Chan D, Eisenberg R, Schneider I (2018) Middle ground approach to paradox: Within- and between-culture examination of the creative benefits of paradoxical frames. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 114(3):443–464.
[72]
Lewis MW (2000) Exploring paradox: Toward a more comprehensive guide. Acad. Management Rev. 25:760–776.
[73]
Lewis MW, Smith WK (2014) Paradox as a metatheoretical perspective: Sharpening the focus and widening the scope. J. Appl. Behav. Sci. 50:127–149.
[74]
Li L (2020) Teaching beyond words: “silence” and its pedagogical implications discoursed in the early classical texts of Confucianism, Daoism and Zen Buddhism. Educ. Philos. Theory 52(7):759–768.
[75]
Li PP (1998) Toward a geocentric framework of organizational form: A holistic, dynamic and paradoxical approach. Organ. Stud. 19:829–861.
[76]
Li PP (2016) Global implications of the indigenous epistemological system from the East: How to apply Yin-Yang balancing to paradox management. Cross Cult. Strategic Management 23(1):42–77.
[77]
Liu Y, Xu S, Zhang B (2020) Thriving at work: How a paradox mindset influences innovative work behavior. J. Appl. Behav. Sci. 56(3):347–366.
[78]
Lüscher LS, Lewis MW (2008) Organizational change and managerial sensemaking: Working through paradox. Acad. Management J. 51:221–240.
[79]
Marcus GE (2011) Multi-sited ethnography: Five or six things I know about it now. Coleman S, von Hellermann P, eds. Multi-Sited Ethnography: Problems and Possibilities in the Translocation of Research Methods (Routledge, Abingdon), 16–32.
[80]
Mees-Buss J, Welch C, Piekkari R (2022) From templates to heuristics: How and why to move beyond the Gioia methodology. Organ. Res. Methods 25(2):405–429.
[81]
Miron-Spektor E, Gino F, Argote L (2011) Paradoxical frames and creative sparks: Enhancing individual creativity through conflict and integration. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 116(2):229–240.
[82]
Miron-Spektor E, Emich KJ, Argote L, Smith WK (2022) Conceiving opposites together: Cultivating paradoxical frames and epistemic motivation fosters team creativity. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 171:104153.
[83]
Miron-Spektor E, Ingram A, Keller J, Smith W, Lewis M (2018) Microfoundations of Organizational paradox: The problem is how we think about the problem. Acad. Management J. 61(1):26–45.
[84]
Morrison EW (2011) Employee voice behavior: Integration and directions for future research. Acad. Management Ann. 5(1):373–412.
[85]
Morrison EW, Milliken FJ (2000) Organizational silence: A barrier to change and development in a pluralistic world. Acad. Management Rev. 25(4):706–725.
[86]
Nisbett RE, Peng K, Choi I, Norenzayan A (2001) Culture and systems of thought: Holistic vs. analytic cognition. Psych. Rev. 108(2):291.
[87]
Ocasio W (1997) Toward an attention‐based view of the firm. Strategic Management J. 18:187–206.
[88]
Pagis M (2010) Producing intersubjectivity in silence: An ethnographic study of meditation practice. Ethnography 11:309–328.
[89]
Pamphile VD (2022) Paradox peers: A relational approach to navigating a business–society paradox. Acad. Management J. 65(4):1274–1302.
[90]
Park SB (1983) Buddhist Faith and Sudden Enlightenment (State University of New York Press, Albany, NY).
[91]
Peng K, Nisbett RE (1999) Culture, dialectics, and reasoning about contradiction. Amer. Psych. 54(9):741.
[92]
Picard M (1961) The World of Silence (Gateway, South Bend, IN).
[93]
Poole MS, Van de Ven AH (1989) Using paradox to build management and organizational theories. Acad. Management Rev. 14:562–578.
[94]
Pradies C (2023) With head and heart: How emotions shape paradox navigation in veterinary work. Acad. Management J. 66(2):521–552.
[95]
Purser RE, Milillo J (2015) Mindfulness revisited: A Buddhist-based conceptualization. J. Management Inquiry 24(1):3–24.
[96]
Putnam LL, Fairhurst GT, Banghart S (2016) Contradictions, dialectics, and paradoxes in organizations: A constitutive approach. Acad. Management Ann. 10:65–171.
[97]
Ray JL, Baker LT, Plowman DA (2011) Organizational mindfulness in business schools. Acad. Management Learn. Educ. 10(2):188–203.
[98]
Reb J, Choi E (2014) Mindfulness in Organizations Psychology of Meditation (Nova Science Publishers, Hauppauge, NY), 279–309.
[99]
Rothbard NP, Phillips KW, Dumas TL (2005) Managing multiple roles: Work-family policies and individuals’ desires for segmentation. Organ. Sci. 16:243–258.
[100]
Rothman N, Pratt M, Rees L, Vogus T (2016) Understanding the dual nature of ambivalence: Why and when ambivalence leads to good and bad outcomes. Acad. Management Ann. 11:33–72.
[101]
Samuelson M, Carmody J, Kabat-Zinn J, Bratt MA (2007) Mindfulness-based stress reduction in Massachusetts correctional facilities. Prison J. 87(2):254–268.
[102]
Schad J, Bansal P (2018) Seeing the forest and the trees: How a systems perspective informs paradox research. J. Management Stud. 55(8):1490–1506.
[103]
Schad J, Lewis M, Raisch S, Smith WK (2016) Paradox research in Management Sci.: Looking back to move forward. Acad. Management Ann. 10:5–64.
[104]
Schoenberg PL, Vago DR (2019) Mapping meditative states and stages with electrophysiology: Concepts, classifications, and methods. Curr. Opin. Psych. 28:211–217.
[105]
Shōji Y (2001) The myth of Zen in the art of archery. Jpn. J. Relig. Stud. 28:1–30.
[106]
Silk JA (2008) Managing Monks: Administrators and Administrative Roles in Indian Buddhist Monasticism (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).
[107]
Sillince J, Jarzabkowski P, Shaw D (2012) Shaping strategic action through the rhetorical construction and exploitation of ambiguity. Organ. Sci. 23(3):630–650.
[108]
Smets M, Jarzabkowski P, Burke GT, Spee P (2015) Reinsurance trading in Lloyd’s of London: Balancing conflicting-yet-complementary logics in practice. Acad. Management J. 58(3):932–970.
[109]
Smith WK (2014) Dynamic decision making: A model of senior leaders managing strategic paradoxes. Acad. Management J. 57:1592–1623.
[110]
Smith WK, Lewis MK (2011) Toward a theory of paradox: A dynamic equilibrium model of organizing. Acad. Management Rev. 36:381–403.
[111]
Smith WK, Tushman ML (2005) Managing strategic contradictions: A top management model for managing innovation streams. Organ. Sci. 16:522–536.
[112]
Smith WK, Gonin M, Besharov ML (2013) Managing social-business tensions: A review and research agenda for social enterprise. Bus. Ethics Quart. 23(3):407–442.
[113]
Song HC (2021) How do Buddhist monks frame conflict? A Buddhist approach to paradox. Negotiation Confl. Management Res. 15(2):148–165.
[114]
Song HC (2023) Identity conflict amidst environmental change: An ethnography of a Korean Buddhist Temple. J. Management Stud. 60(4):889–923.
[115]
Stahl B, Goldstein E (2019) A Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction Workbook (New Harbinger Publications, Oakland, CA).
[116]
Stern DG (1995) Wittgenstein on Mind and Language (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).
[117]
Suddaby R (2010) Editor’s comments: Construct clarity in theories of management and organization. Acad. Management Rev. 35(3):346–357.
[118]
Suddaby R, Greenwood R (2005) Rhetorical strategies of legitimacy. Admin. Sci. Quart. 50(1):35–67.
[119]
Takahashi T, Murata T, Hamada T, Omori M, Kosaka H, Kikuchi M, Yoshida H, Wada Y (2005) Changes in EEG and autonomic nervous activity during meditation and their association with personality traits. Internat. J. Psychophysiol. 55(2):199–207.
[120]
Tan CM (2012) Search Inside Yourself: Increase Productivity, Creativity and Happiness (HarperCollins, New York).
[121]
Tang YY, Hölzel BK, Posner MI (2015) The neuroscience of mindfulness meditation. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 16(4):213–225.
[122]
Van Maanen J (2011) Tales of the Field: On Writing Ethnography (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).
[123]
Vaara E, Tienar J (2008) A discursive perspective on legitimation strategies in multinational corporations. Acad. Management Rev. 33(4):985–993.
[124]
Vince R, Broussine M (1996) Paradox, defense and attachment: Accessing and working with emotions and relations underlying organizational change. Organ. Stud. 17(1):1–21.
[125]
Visnjic I, Jovanovic M, Raisch S (2022) Managing the transition to a dual business model: Tradeoff, paradox, and routinized practices. Organ. Sci. 33(5):1964–1989.
[126]
Walsh JP (1995) Managerial and organizational cognition: Notes from a trip down memory lane. Organ. Sci. 6:280–321.
[127]
Weick KE (1995) Sensemaking in Organizations (Sage, London).
[128]
Weick KE, Putnam T (2006) Organizing for mindfulness: Eastern wisdom and Western knowledge. J. Management Inquiry 15(3):275–287.
[129]
Weick KE, Sutcliffe KM (2006) Mindfulness and the quality of organizational attention. Organ. Sci. 17(4):514–524.
[130]
Wittgenstein L (1994) Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus (e-artnow ebooks).
[131]
Yu L, Zellmer-Bruhn M (2018) Introducing team mindfulness and considering its safeguard role against conflict transformation and social undermining. Acad. Management J. 61(1):324–347.
[132]
Zerubavel E (1993) The Fine Line (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).
[133]
Zhang Y, Waldman DA, Han YL, Li XB (2015) Paradoxical leader behaviors in people management: Antecedents and consequences. Acad. Management J. 58:538–566.
Index Terms
- A Buddhist Mindfulness View of Paradox: Silence and Skepticism of Language to Dismantle Paradoxes
Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.
Recommendations
Formalizing the Unexpected Hanging Paradox: A Classical Surprise
Logic and ArgumentationAbstractIn this work, we define a novel approach to the formalization of the unexpected hanging paradox, sometimes called the surprise examination paradox, mechanized in the Coq Proof Assistant. This paradox requires the definition of the notion of a ...
Leveraging paradox in systems engineering: Discovering wisdom
Based on preliminary research of the experience of groups like the policy community, we believe that engineers, especially those developing systems of systems, may benefit from an appreciation of paradox. For example, the policy community embraces and ...
Effects of Loving-Kindness Meditation on Mindfulness, Spirituality and Subjective Well-Being of Flight Attendants
Cross-Cultural Design. Applications in Health, Learning, Communication, and CreativityAbstractThis study investigated (1) the effects of the loving-kindness meditation on mindfulness, subjective well-being (SWB), and spirituality and (2) the relationships between mindfulness, spirituality, and SWB. Methods: 98 flight attendants from Xiamen ...
Comments
Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
Copyright © 2024, INFORMS.
Publisher
INFORMS
Linthicum, MD, United States
Publication History
Published: 07 June 2024
Accepted: 16 May 2024
Received: 08 February 2022
Author Tags
Qualifiers
- Research-article
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- 0Total Citations
- 0Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)0
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 06 Feb 2025