Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
research-article

Stability, Memory, and Messaging Trade-Offs in Heterogeneous Service Systems

Published: 01 August 2022 Publication History

Abstract

We consider a heterogeneous distributed service system consisting of n servers with unknown and possibly different processing rates. Jobs with unit mean arrive as a renewal process of rate proportional to n and are immediately dispatched to one of several queues associated with the servers. We assume that the dispatching decisions are made by a central dispatcher with the ability to exchange messages with the servers and endowed with a finite memory used to store information from one decision epoch to the next, about the current state of the queues and about the service rates of the servers. We study the fundamental resource requirements (memory bits and message exchange rate) in order for a dispatching policy to be always stable. First, we present a policy that is always stable while using a positive (but arbitrarily small) message rate and log2(n) bits of memory. Second, we show that within a certain broad class of policies, a dispatching policy that exchanges o(n2) messages per unit of time, and with o(log (n)) bits of memory, cannot be always stable.

References

[1]
Anselmi J (2019) Combining size-based load balancing with round-robin for scalable low latency. IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Systems 31(4):886–896.
[2]
Anselmi J, Dufour F (2020) Power-of-d-choices with memory: Fluid limit and optimality. Math. Oper. Res. 45(3):862–888.
[3]
Atar R, Keslassy I, Mendelson G, Orda A, Vargaftik S (2020) Persistent-Idle load-distribution. Stochastic Systems 10(2):152–169.
[4]
Bramson M (2011) Stability of join the shortest queue network. Ann. Appl. Probab. 21(4):1568–1625.
[5]
Foster F (1953) On the stochastic matrices associated with certain queueing processes. Ann. Math. Statist. 24(3):355–360.
[6]
Gamarnik D, Tsitsiklis JN, Zubeldia M (2018) Delay, memory, and messaging tradeoffs in distributed service systems. Stochastic Systems 8(1):45–74.
[7]
Gamarnik D, Tsitsiklis JN, Zubeldia M (2020) A lower bound on the queueing delay in resource constrained load balancing. Ann. Appl. Probab. 30(2):870–901.
[8]
Lu Y, Xie Q, Kliot G, Geller A, Larus J, Greenberg A (2011) Join-Idle-Queue: A novel load balancing algorithm for dynamically scalable web services. Performance Evaluation 68(11):1056–1071.
[9]
Mitzenmacher M (1996) The power of two choices in randomized load balancing. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of California, Berkeley.
[10]
Mukherjee D, Borst S, van Leeuwaarden J, Whiting P (2016) Universality of power-of-d load balancing schemes. Workshop Math. Perform. Model. Anal. ACM SIGMETRICS Performance Evaluation Rev. 44(2):36–38.
[11]
Shah D, Prabhakar B (2002) The use of memory in randomized load balancing. Proc. IEEE Internat. Sympos. Inform. Theory (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Piscataway, NJ).
[12]
Stolyar A (2015) Pull-based load distribution in large-scale heterogeneous service systems. Queueing Systems 80(4):341–361.
[13]
van der Boor M, Zubeldia M, Borst S (2020) Zero-wait load balancing with sparse messaging. Oper. Res. Lett. 48(3):368–375.
[14]
Vargaftik S, Keslassy I, Orda A (2020) LSQ: Load balancing in large-scale heterogeneous systems with multiple dispatchers. IEEE/ACM Trans. Networking 28(3):1186–1198.
[15]
Vvedenskaya ND, Dobrushin RL, Karpelevich FI (1996) Queueing system with selection of the shortest of two queues: An asymptotic approach. Problems Inform. Transmission 32(1):15–27.
[16]
Zhou X, Shroff N, Wierman A (2021) Asymptotically optimal load balancing in large-scale heterogeneous systems with multiple dispatchers. ACM SIGMETRICS Performance Evaluation Rev. 48(3):57–58.

Cited By

View all

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Mathematics of Operations Research
Mathematics of Operations Research  Volume 47, Issue 3
August 2022
840 pages
ISSN:0364-765X
DOI:10.1287/moor.2022.47.issue-3
Issue’s Table of Contents

Publisher

INFORMS

Linthicum, MD, United States

Publication History

Published: 01 August 2022
Accepted: 11 June 2021
Received: 10 July 2020

Author Tags

  1. Primary: 60G52
  2. secondary: 90B22

Author Tags

  1. load balancing
  2. stability
  3. memory
  4. communication overhead

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 0
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 03 Mar 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all

View Options

View options

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media