Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
research-article

Bundling for Flexibility and Variety: : An Economic Model for Multiproducer Value Aggregation

Published: 01 April 2021 Publication History

Abstract

Many markets feature an economic structure in which value is cocreated by multiple producers and aggregated into a common bundle by a producer-consortium or independent firm. Examples include in-home video entertainment, technology goods and services, multisourced data platforms, and patent pools. This paper develops an economic model to study demand, production choices, revenue sharing, and relative market power in such markets. Producers in these markets are not rivalrous competitors in the usual zero-sum sense, because output of each casts an externality on production decisions of others and total market demand expands with total output, albeit with diminishing returns. This property allows multiple producers to flourish in equilibrium (versus just one with the most favorable technological or cost structure), and more so when the market expands less quickly with total output. Equilibrium production quantities of competitors are strategic complements, yet competition between producers does manifest itself, for example, if one acquires better production technology (i.e., makes value units at lower cost) then the equilibrium production levels of other producers are reduced. Insights are also derived for alternative market structures, for example, producers have more output and earn higher profit when organized into a distribution consortium (e.g., Hulu or consortia of zoos or museums) versus relying on a separate retailer. Mergers between producers have similar effect. The formulation enables us to rigorously answer economic questions ranging from pricing, revenue sharing, and production levels in a static setting, to market dynamics covering both the causes and effects of changes in industry structure.
This paper was accepted by Chris Forman, information systems.

References

[1]
Adams WJ, Yellen JL (1976) Commodity bundling and the burden of monopoly. Quart. J. Econom. 90(3):475–498.
[2]
Adner R, Chen J, Zhu F (2020) Frenemies in patform markets: Heterogeneous profit foci as drivers of compatibility decisions. Management Sci. 66(6):2432–2451.
[3]
Bakos Y, Brynjolfsson E (2000) Bundling and competition on the Internet. Marketing Sci. 19(1):63–82.
[4]
Bhargava HK (2012) Retailer-driven product bundling in a distribution channel. Marketing Sci. 31(6):1014–1021.
[5]
Bhargava HK (2013) Mixed bundling of two independently-valued goods. Management Sci . 59(9):2170–2185.
[6]
Ceccagnoli M, Forman C, Huang P, Wu D (2012) Co-creation of value in a platform ecosystem: The case of enterprise software. MIS Quart. 36(1):263–290.
[7]
Chen Y, Riordan MH (2007) Price and variety in the spokes model. Econom. J. 117(522):897–921.
[8]
Choudary SP, Van Alstyne MW, Parker GG (2016) Platform Revolution: How Networked Markets Are Transforming the Economy—And How to Make Them Work for You , 1st ed. (W. W. Norton & Company, New York).
[9]
Cournot AA (1838 [1929]) Researches into the Mathematical Principles of the Theory of Wealth. Trans. Nathaniel T. Bacon. (Macmillan Company, New York).
[10]
Cusumano MA, Gawer A, Yoffie DB (2019) The Business of Platforms: Strategy in the Age of Digital Competition, Innovation, and Power (HarperCollins, New York)
[11]
Demirezen EM, Kumar S, Shetty B (2018) Two is better than one: A dynamic analysis of value co-creation. Production Oper. Management, ePub ahead of print February 28, https://doi.org/10.1111/poms.12862.
[12]
Economides N, Salop SC (1992) Competition and integration among complements and network market structure. J. Indust. Econom. 40(1):105–123.
[13]
Farrell J, Monroe HK, Saloner G (1998) The vertical organization of industry: Systems competition vs. component competition. J. Econom. Management Strategy 7(2):143–182.
[14]
Ferreira RDS, Thisse JF (1996) Horizontal and vertical differentiation: The Launhardt model. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. 14(4):485–506.
[15]
Foerderer J, Kude T, Mithas S, Heinzl A (2018) Does platform owner’s entry crowd out innovation? Evidence from google photos. Inform. Systems Res . 29(2):440–460.
[16]
Gabszwicz JJ, Thisse JF (1986) On the nature of competition with differentiated products. Econom. J. (London) 96(381): 160–172.
[17]
Hagiu A (2009) Two-sided platforms: Product variety and pricing structures. J. Econom. Management Strategy 18(4):1011–1043.
[18]
Hagiu A, Spulber D (2013) First-party content and coordination in two-sided markets. Management Sci. 59(4):933–949.
[19]
Holmgren MA, McCracken VA, McCluskey JJ (2016) Should I ski today? The economics of ski resort season passes. Leisure/Loisir 40(2):131–148.
[20]
Jansen S, Cusumano MA (2013) Defining software ecosystems: A survey of software platforms and business network governance. Jansen S, Brinkkemper S, Cusumano MA, eds. Software Ecosystems: Analyzing and Managing Business Networks in the Software Industry (Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, UK), 13–28.
[21]
Katz ML, Shapiro C (1994) Systems competition and network effects. J. Econom. Perspect. 8(2):93–115.
[22]
Lerner J, Tirole J (2004) Efficient patent pools. Amer. Econom. Rev. 94(3):691–711.
[23]
Matutes C, Regibeau P (1988) ”Mix and match”: Product compatibility without network externalities. RAND J. Econom. 19(2):221–234.
[24]
McAfee R, McMillan J, Whinston MD (1989) Multiproduct monopoly, commodity bundling, and correlation of values. Quart. J. Econom. 104(2):371–383.
[25]
Nguyen T, Kannan KN (2019) Welfare implications in intermediary networks. Preprint, submitted April 24, 2019, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2814569.
[26]
Nocke V, Peitz M, Stahl K (2007) Platform ownership. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 5(6):1130–1160.
[27]
Ohno-Machado L, Agha Z, Bell DS, Dahm L, Day ME, Doctor JN, Gabriel D, et al. (2014) pscanner: Patient-centered scalable national network for effectiveness research. J. Amer. Med. Inform. Assoc. 21(4):621–626.
[28]
Olderog T, Skiera B (2000) The benefits of bundling strategies. Schmalenbach Bus. Rev. 1:137–160.
[29]
Rao VR, Russell GJ, Bhargava H, Cooke A, Derdenger T, Kim H, Kumar N, et al. (2018) Emerging trends in product bundling: Investigating consumer choice and firm behavior. Customer Needs Solutions 5(1):107–120.
[30]
Schmalensee R (1984) Gaussian demand and commodity bundling. J. Bus. 57(1):S211–S230.
[31]
Shaked A, Sutton J (1982) Relaxing price competition through product differentiation. Rev. Econom. Stud. 49(1):3–13.
[32]
Stigler G (1963) United states v. Loew’s inc: A note on block-booking. Supreme Court Rev. 1963(1963):152–157.
[33]
Ulin JC (2019) The Business of Media Distribution: Monetizing Film, TV, and Video Content in an Online World (Routledge, New York).
[34]
Varian H (1992) Microeconomic Analysis (Norton, New York).
[35]
Venkatesh R, Kamakura W (2003) Optimal bundling and pricing under a monopoly: Contrasting complements and substitutes from independently valued products. J. Bus. 76(2):211–232.
[36]
Zhu F, Liu Q (2018) Competing with complementors: An empirical look at amazon.com. Strategic Management J. 39(10):2618–2642.

Cited By

View all

Index Terms

  1. Bundling for Flexibility and Variety: An Economic Model for Multiproducer Value Aggregation
            Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

            Recommendations

            Comments

            Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

            Information & Contributors

            Information

            Published In

            cover image Management Science
            Management Science  Volume 67, Issue 4
            April 2021
            667 pages
            ISSN:0025-1909
            DOI:10.1287/mnsc.2021.67.issue-4
            Issue’s Table of Contents

            Publisher

            INFORMS

            Linthicum, MD, United States

            Publication History

            Published: 01 April 2021
            Accepted: 10 February 2020
            Received: 29 April 2019

            Author Tags

            1. value cocreation
            2. bundling
            3. aggregators
            4. revenue sharing
            5. platforms

            Qualifiers

            • Research-article

            Contributors

            Other Metrics

            Bibliometrics & Citations

            Bibliometrics

            Article Metrics

            • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
            • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
            Reflects downloads up to 13 Nov 2024

            Other Metrics

            Citations

            Cited By

            View all

            View Options

            View options

            Get Access

            Login options

            Media

            Figures

            Other

            Tables

            Share

            Share

            Share this Publication link

            Share on social media