Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
research-article

Measuring Misinformation in Video Search Platforms: An Audit Study on YouTube

Published: 29 May 2020 Publication History

Abstract

Search engines are the primary gateways of information. Yet, they do not take into account the credibility of search results. There is a growing concern that YouTube, the second largest search engine and the most popular video-sharing platform, has been promoting and recommending misinformative content for certain search topics. In this study, we audit YouTube to verify those claims. Our audit experiments investigate whether personalization (based on age, gender, geolocation, or watch history) contributes to amplifying misinformation. After shortlisting five popular topics known to contain misinformative content and compiling associated search queries representing them, we conduct two sets of audits-Search-and Watch-misinformative audits. Our audits resulted in a dataset of more than 56K videos compiled to link stance (whether promoting misinformation or not) with the personalization attribute audited. Our videos correspond to three major YouTube components: search results, Up-Next, and Top 5 recommendations. We find that demographics, such as, gender, age, and geolocation do not have a significant effect on amplifying misinformation in returned search results for users with brand new accounts. On the other hand, once a user develops a watch history, these attributes do affect the extent of misinformation recommended to them. Further analyses reveal a filter bubble effect, both in the Top 5 and Up-Next recommendations for all topics, except vaccine controversies; for these topics, watching videos that promote misinformation leads to more misinformative video recommendations. In conclusion, YouTube still has a long way to go to mitigate misinformation on its platform.

References

[1]
Jonathan Albright. 2018. UnTrue Tube - hspace1mm YouTube's Conspiracy Ecosystem. https://datajournalismawards.org/projects/untrue-tube-youtubes-conspiracy-ecosystem/
[2]
Hunt Allcott and Matthew Gentzkow. 2017. Social Media and Fake News in the 2016 Election. Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 31, 2 (2017), 211--36. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.31.2.211
[3]
Gordon W. Allport and Leo Postman. 1946. An Analysis of Rumor. Public Opinion Quarterly, Vol. 10, 4 (1946), 501--517. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/10.4.501
[4]
Rebecca Lee Armstrong. 2019. New Survey Suggests 10% of Americans Believe the Moon Landing Was Fake. (2019). https://www.satelliteinternet.com/resources/moon-landing-real-survey/
[5]
Woodrow Bellamy. 2019. Malaysia Airlines Flight 370 Final Report Inconclusive. (2019). https://www.aviationtoday.com/2018/08/02/malaysia-airlines-flight-370-final-report-inconclusive/
[6]
Alessandro Bessi, Mauro Coletto, George Alexandru Davidescu, Antonio Scala, Guido Caldarelli, and Walter Quattrociocchi. 2015. Science vs conspiracy: Collective narratives in the age of misinformation. PloS one, Vol. 10, 2 (2015), e0118093. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0118093
[7]
Thomas DG Burgess II and Stephen M Sales. 1971. Attitudinal effects of ?mere exposure": A reevaluation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 7, 4 (1971), 461--472. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022--1031(71)90078--3
[8]
Nick Carne. 2019. textquotesingle Conspiraciestextquotesinglehspace0.5mmdominate YouTube climate modification videos. (2019). https://cosmosmagazine.com/social-sciences/conspiracies-dominate-youtube-climate-modification-videos
[9]
Carlos Castillo, Marcelo Mendoza, and Barbara Poblete. 2011. Information credibility on twitter. In Proceedings of the 20th international conference on World wide web. ACM, 675--684. https://doi.org/10.1145/1963405.1963500
[10]
Le Chen, Ruijun Ma, Anikó Hannák, and Christo Wilson. 2018. Investigating the Impact of Gender on Rank in Resume Search Engines. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '18). ACM, Article 651, 651:1--651:14 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3174225
[11]
Le Chen, Alan Mislove, and Christo Wilson. 2015a. Peeking beneath the hood of uber. In Proceedings of the 2015 internet measurement conference. 495--508. https://doi.org/10.1145/2815675.2815681
[12]
Le Chen, Alan Mislove, and Christo Wilson. 2016. An empirical analysis of algorithmic pricing on amazon marketplace. In Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on World Wide Web. 1339--1349. https://doi.org/10.1145/2872427.2883089
[13]
Xinran Chen, Sei-Ching Joanna Sin, Yin-Leng Theng, and Chei Sian Lee. 2015b. Why students share misinformation on social media: Motivation, gender, and study-level differences. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, Vol. 41, 5 (2015), 583--592. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2015.07.003
[14]
Cisco. 2019. Cisco Visual Networking Index: Forecast and Trends, 2017--2022 White Paper. (2019). https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/solutions/collateral/service-provider/visual-networking-index-vni/white-paper-c11--741490.html
[15]
Paul Covington, Jay Adams, and Emre Sargin. 2016. Deep Neural Networks for YouTube Recommendations. In Proceedings of the 10th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems. https://doi.org/10.1145/2959100.2959190
[16]
Munmun De Choudhury, Meredith Ringel Morris, and Ryen W White. 2014. Seeking and sharing health information online: comparing search engines and social media. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 1365--1376. https://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557214
[17]
Nicholas Diakopoulos, Daniel Trielli, Jennifer Stark, and Sean Mussenden. 2018. I Vote Fortextendash hspace1mmHow Search Informs Our Choice of Candidate. Digital Dominance: The Power of Google, Amazon, Facebook, and Apple, M. Moore and D. Tambini (Eds.), Vol. 22 (2018). https://www.academia.edu/37432634/I_Vote_For_How_Search_Informs_Our_Choice_of_Candidate
[18]
Renee Diresta. 2018. The Complexity of Simply Searching for Medical Advice. https://www.wired.com/story/the-complexity-of-simply-searching-for-medical-advice/
[19]
James N Druckman and Michael Parkin. 2005. The impact of media bias: How editorial slant affects voters. The Journal of Politics, Vol. 67, 4 (2005), 1030--1049. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468--2508.2005.00349.x
[20]
Andrea Freyer Dugas, Yu-Hsiang Hsieh, Scott R Levin, Jesse M Pines, Darren P Mareiniss, Amir Mohareb, Charlotte A Gaydos, Trish M Perl, and Richard E Rothman. 2012. Google Flu Trends: correlation with emergency department influenza rates and crowding metrics. Clinical infectious diseases, Vol. 54, 4 (2012), 463--469. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/cir883
[21]
Robert Epstein, Ronald E Robertson, David Lazer, and Christo Wilson. 2017. Suppressing the search engine manipulation effect (SEME). Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 1, CSCW (2017), 1--22. https://doi.org/10.1145/3134677
[22]
Adrien Friggeri, Lada Adamic, Dean Eckles, and Justin Cheng. 2014. Rumor cascades. In Eighth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media. https://www.aaai.org/ocs/index.php/ICWSM/ICWSM14/paper/viewFile/8122/8110
[23]
Eric Gaillard. 2019. Facebook Under Fire for Permitting Anti-Vax Groups. (2019). https://www.thedailybeast.com/facebook-under-fire-for-permitting-anti-vaccination-groups
[24]
Tarleton Gillespie. 2014. The relevance of algorithms. Media technologies: Essays on communication, materiality, and society, Vol. 167 (2014). https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/Gillespie_2014_The-Relevance-of-Algorithms.pdf
[25]
Andrew Guess, Jonathan Nagler, and Joshua Tucker. 2019. Less than you think: Prevalence and predictors of fake news dissemination on Facebook. Science advances, Vol. 5, 1 (2019), eaau4586. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aau4586
[26]
Aditi Gupta, Hemank Lamba, Ponnurangam Kumaraguru, and Anupam Joshi. 2013. Faking sandy: characterizing and identifying fake images on twitter during hurricane sandy. In Proceedings of the 22nd international conference on World Wide Web. ACM, 729--736. https://doi.org/10.1145/2487788.2488033
[27]
James Hale. 2019. More Than 500 Hours Of Content Are Now Being Uploaded To YouTube Every Minute. (2019). https://www.tubefilter.com/2019/05/07/number-hours-video-uploaded-to-youtube-per-minute/
[28]
Aniko Hannak, Piotr Sapiezynski, Arash Molavi Kakhki, Balachander Krishnamurthy, David Lazer, Alan Mislove, and Christo Wilson. 2013. Measuring Personalization of Web Search. In Proceedings of the 22Nd International Conference on World Wide Web (WWW '13). ACM, 527--538. https://doi.org/10.1145/2488388.2488435
[29]
Aniko Hannak, Gary Soeller, David Lazer, Alan Mislove, and Christo Wilson. 2014. Measuring price discrimination and steering on e-commerce web sites. In Proceedings of the 2014 conference on internet measurement conference. 305--318. https://doi.org/10.1145/2663716.2663744
[30]
Anikó Hannák, Claudia Wagner, David Garcia, Alan Mislove, Markus Strohmaier, and Christo Wilson. 2017. Bias in Online Freelance Marketplaces: Evidence from TaskRabbit and Fiverr. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (CSCW '17). ACM, 1914--1933. https://doi.org/10.1145/2998181.2998327
[31]
Google Trends Help. 2020. Explore results by region. (2020). https://support.google.com/trends/answer/4355212?hl=en
[32]
Benjamin D Horne and Sibel Adali. 2017. This just in: Fake news packs a lot in title, uses simpler, repetitive content in text body, more similar to satire than real news. In Eleventh International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media .
[33]
Desheng Hu, Shan Jiang, Ronald E. Robertson, and Christo Wilson. 2019. Auditing the Partisanship of Google Search Snippets. In The World Wide Web Conference (WWW '19). ACM, 693--704. https://doi.org/10.1145/3308558.3313654
[34]
Shan Jiang, Ronald E Robertson, and Christo Wilson. 2019. Bias Misperceived: The Role of Partisanship and Misinformation in YouTube Comment Moderation. In Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, Vol. 13. 278--289.
[35]
Chloe Kliman-Silver, Aniko Hannak, David Lazer, Christo Wilson, and Alan Mislove. 2015a. Location, Location, Location: The Impact of Geolocation on Web Search Personalization. In Proceedings of the 2015 Internet Measurement Conference (IMC '15). ACM, 121--127.
[36]
Chloe Kliman-Silver, Aniko Hannak, David Lazer, Christo Wilson, and Alan Mislove. 2015b. Location, location, location: The impact of geolocation on web search personalization. In Proceedings of the 2015 Internet Measurement Conference. ACM, 121--127. https://doi.org/10.1145/2815675.2815714
[37]
Peter Knight. 2008. Outrageous conspiracy theories: Popular and official responses to 9/11 in Germany and the United States. New German Critique 103 (2008), 165--193. https://doi.org/10.1215/0094033X-2007-024
[38]
Srijan Kumar and Neil Shah. 2018. False information on web and social media: A survey. arXiv preprint arXiv:1804.08559 (2018).
[39]
Srijan Kumar, Robert West, and Jure Leskovec. 2016. Disinformation on the web: Impact, characteristics, and detection of wikipedia hoaxes. In Proceedings of the 25th international conference on World Wide Web. International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee, 591--602. https://doi.org/10.1145/2872427.2883085
[40]
William Langewiesche. 2019. What Really Happened to Malaysia's Missing Airplane. (2019). https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2019/07/mh370-malaysia-airlines/590653/
[41]
Bruno Latour and Steve Woolgar. 2013. Laboratory life: The construction of scientific facts .Princeton University Press.
[42]
Paul Lewis and Erin McCormick. 2018. How an ex-YouTube insider investigated its secret algorithm. (2018). https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2018/feb/02/youtube-algorithm-election-clinton-trump-guillaume-chaslot
[43]
Ramona Ludolph, Ahmed Allam, and Peter Schulz. 2016. Manipulating Googletextquotesingle s Knowledge Graph Box to Counter Biased Information Processing During an Online Search on Vaccination: Application of a Technological Debiasing Strategy. Journal of Medical Internet Research, Vol. 18 (2016), e137. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.5430
[44]
Logan McDonald and Caroline O'Donovan. 2019. YouTube Continues To Promote Anti-Vax Videos As Facebook Prepares To Fight Medical Misinformation. (2019). https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/carolineodonovan/youtube-anti-vaccination-video-recommendations
[45]
Annalisa Merelli. 2015. The average anti-vaxxer is probably not who you think she is. (2015). https://qz.com/355398/the-average-anti-vaxxer-is-probably-not-who-you-think-she-is/
[46]
Danaë Metaxa, Joon Sung Park, James A Landay, and Jeff Hancock. 2019. Search Media and Elections: A Longitudinal Investigation of Political Search Results. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 3, CSCW (2019), 1--17. https://doi.org/10.1145/3359231
[47]
P Takis Metaxas and Yada Pruksachatkun. 2017. Manipulation of search engine results during the 2016 US congressional elections. (2017).
[48]
Tanushree Mitra and Eric Gilbert. 2015. Credbank: A large-scale social media corpus with associated credibility annotations. In Ninth International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media. https://www.aaai.org/ocs/index.php/ICWSM/ICWSM15/paper/download/10582/10509
[49]
NASA. 2001. NASA Facts. (2001). https://web.archive.org/web/20151213100852/ftp://ftp.hq.nasa.gov/pub/pao/media/2001/lunar_landing.pdf
[50]
BBC News. 2011. 9/11 conspiracy theories: How they've evolved. (2011). https://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-14665953
[51]
BBC News. 2019. Measles: Four European nations lose eradication status. (2019). https://www.bbc.com/news/health-49507253
[52]
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. 2016. Do Contrails Affect Conditions on the Surface? (2016). https://www.nesdis.noaa.gov/content/do-contrails-affect-conditions-surface
[53]
Alex Olshansky. 2018. Conspiracy Theorizing and Religious Motivated Reasoning: Why the Earth textquotesingle Musttextquotesinglehspace0.5mm Be Flat. (2018). https://ttu-ir.tdl.org/handle/2346/82666
[54]
World Health Organization. 2019 a. MMR and autism. (2019). https://www.who.int/vaccine_safety/committee/topics/mmr/mmr_autism/en/
[55]
World Health Organization. 2019 b. Six common misconceptions about immunization. (2019). https://www.who.int/vaccine_safety/initiative/detection/immunization_misconceptions/en/index3.html
[56]
World Health Organization. 2019 c. Ten threats to global health in 2019. https://www.who.int/emergencies/ten-threats-to-global-health-in-2019
[57]
Eli Pariser. 2011. The filter bubble: How the new personalized web is changing what we read and how we think .Penguin.
[58]
Gordon Pennycook, Tyrone D Cannon, and David G Rand. 2018. Prior exposure increases perceived accuracy of fake news. Journal of experimental psychology: general (2018). https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000465
[59]
Larry Peterson, Tom Anderson, David Culler, and Timothy Roscoe. 2003. A Blueprint for Introducing Disruptive Technology into the Internet. SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, Vol. 33, 1 (2003), 59--64. https://doi.org/10.1145/774763.774772
[60]
K Purcell. 2011. Findings: Search and email remain the top online activities| Pew Internet & American Life Project. Pew Research Center's Internet & American Life Project (2011).
[61]
Vahed Qazvinian, Emily Rosengren, Dragomir R Radev, and Qiaozhu Mei. 2011. Rumor has it: Identifying misinformation in microblogs. In Proceedings of the conference on empirical methods in natural language processing. Association for Computational Linguistics, 1589--1599.
[62]
M. Rajdev and K. Lee. 2015. Fake and Spam Messages: Detecting Misinformation During Natural Disasters on Social Media. In 2015 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology, Vol. 1. 17--20. https://doi.org/10.1109/WI-IAT.2015.102
[63]
Ronald E. Robertson, Shan Jiang, Kenneth Joseph, Lisa Friedland, David Lazer, and Christo Wilson. 2018a. Auditing Partisan Audience Bias Within Google Search. Proceedings of ACM on Human Computer Interaction, Vol. 2, CSCW (2018), 148:1--148:22. https://doi.org/10.1145/3274417
[64]
Ronald E. Robertson, David Lazer, and Christo Wilson. 2018b. Auditing the Personalization and Composition of Politically-Related Search Engine Results Pages. In Proceedings of the 2018 World Wide Web Conference (WWW '18). International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee, 955--965. https://doi.org/10.1145/3178876.3186143
[65]
Ashley Rodriguez. 2018. YouTube's algorithms can drag you down a rabbit hole of conspiracies, researcher finds. (2018). https://qz.com/1215937/research-youtubes-algorithms-lead-down-a-rabbit-hole-of-conspiracies/
[66]
Mattia Samory and Tanushree Mitra. 2018a. Conspiracies Online: User Discussions in a Conspiracy Community Following Dramatic Events. In ICWSM. https://www.aaai.org/ocs/index.php/ICWSM/ICWSM18/paper/viewFile/17907/17025
[67]
Mattia Samory and Tanushree Mitra. 2018b. 'The Government Spies Using Our Webcams': The Language of Conspiracy Theories in Online Discussions. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 2 (2018), 1--24. https://doi.org/10.1145/3274421
[68]
Christian Sandvig, Kevin Hamilton, Karrie Karahalios, and Cedric Langbort. 2014a. An algorithm audit. Data and Discrimination: Collected Essays. Washington, DC: New America Foundation (2014), 6--10. http://www-personal.umich.edu/ csandvig/research/An%20Algorithm%20Audit.pdf
[69]
Christian Sandvig, Kevin Hamilton, Karrie Karahalios, and Cedric Langbort. 2014b. Auditing algorithms: Research methods for detecting discrimination on internet platforms. Data and discrimination: converting critical concerns into productive inquiry, Vol. 22 (2014). https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/b722/7cbd34766655dea10d0437ab10df3a127396.pdf
[70]
Susan Scutti. 2019. Facebook to target vaccine misinformation with focus on pages, groups, ads. (2019). https://www.cnn.com/2019/03/07/health/facebook-anti-vax-messages-bn/index.html
[71]
Geoff Shepard. 2015. The Real Watergate Scandal: Collusion, Conspiracy, and the Plot That Brought Nixon Down .Simon and Schuster.
[72]
Tamotsu Shibutani. 1966. Improvised news: A sociological study of rumor .Ardent Media. https://doi.org/10.2307/2574636
[73]
Natalie Jomini Stroud. 2010. Polarization and partisan selective exposure. Journal of communication, Vol. 60, 3 (2010), 556--576. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460--2466.2010.01497.x
[74]
Cass R Sunstein. 2014. Conspiracy theories and other dangerous ideas .Simon and Schuster.
[75]
American Osteopathic Association Media Team. 2019 a. 45% of American adults doubt vaccine safety, according to survey. (2019). https://osteopathic.org/2019/06/24/45-of-american-adults-doubt-vaccine-safety-according-to-survey/
[76]
The YouTube Team. 2019 b. Continuing our work to improve recommendations on YouTube. (2019). https://youtube.googleblog.com/2019/01/continuing-our-work-to-improve.html
[77]
Los Angeles Times. 2017. Man inspired by false 'pizzagate' rumor on Internet pleads guilty to shooting at D.C. restaurant. (2017). https://www.latimes.com/nation/nationnow/la-na-pizzagate-shooting-20170324-story.html
[78]
The New York Times. 2004. The New York Times/CBS News Poll. (2004). http://www.nytimes.com/packages/html/politics/20040429_poll/20040429_poll_results.pdf
[79]
Dustin Tingley and Gernot Wagner. 2017. Solar geoengineering and the chemtrails conspiracy on social media. Palgrave Communications, Vol. 3, 1 (2017), 12. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-017-0014--3
[80]
Daniel Trielli and Nicholas Diakopoulos. 2019. Search As News Curator: The Role of Google in Shaping Attention to News Information. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '19). ACM, Article 453, 453:1--453:15 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300683
[81]
Nicholas Vincent, Isaac Johnson, Patrick Sheehan, and Brent Hecht. 2019. Measuring the Importance of User-Generated Content to Search Engines. Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, Vol. 13, 01 (2019), 505--516. https://www.aaai.org/ojs/index.php/ICWSM/article/download/3248/3116/
[82]
Xuanhui Wang, Nadav Golbandi, Michael Bendersky, Donald Metzler, and Marc Najork. 2018. Position bias estimation for unbiased learning to rank in personal search. In Proceedings of the Eleventh ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining. ACM, 610--618. https://doi.org/10.1145/3159652.3159732
[83]
Cale Guthrie Weissman. 2019. Despite recent crackdown, YouTube still promotes plenty of conspiracies. (2019). https://www.fastcompany.com/90307451/despite-recent-crackdown-youtube-still-promotes-plenty-of-conspiracies
[84]
Wikipedia. 2002. Conspiracy theory. (2002). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conspiracy_theory
[85]
Wikipedia. 2003. List of conspiracy theories. (2003). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_conspiracy_theories
[86]
Wikipedia. 2019 a. Malaysia Airlines Flight 370. (2019). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malaysia_Airlines_Flight_370
[87]
Wikipedia. 2019 b. Project MKUltra. (2019). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_MKUltra
[88]
Michael Wood. 2013. Has the internet been good for conspiracy theorising. PsyPAG Quarterly, Vol. 88 (2013), 31--34. http://www.psypag.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/Issue-88.pdf#page=33
[89]
Zhijing Wu, Yiqun Liu, Qianfan Zhang, Kailu Wu, Min Zhang, and Shaoping Ma. 2019. The influence of image search intents on user behavior and satisfaction. In Proceedings of the Twelfth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining. ACM, 645--653. https://doi.org/10.1145/3289600.3291013
[90]
Xiaohui Xie, Yiqun Liu, Maarten De Rijke, Jiyin He, Min Zhang, and Shaoping Ma. 2018. Why people search for images using web search engines. In Proceedings of the Eleventh ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining. ACM, 655--663. https://doi.org/10.1145/3159652.3159686
[91]
YouGov. 2018. Most flat earthers consider themselves very religious. (2018). https://today.yougov.com/topics/philosophy/articles-reports/2018/04/02/most-flat-earthers-consider-themselves-religious
[92]
YouTube. 2020. YouTube Community Guidelines. (2020). https://www.youtube.com/about/policies/#community-guidelines
[93]
Marvin Zonis and Craig M Joseph. 1994. Conspiracy thinking in the Middle East. Political Psychology (1994), 443--459. https://doi.org/10.2307/3791566
[94]
Arkaitz Zubiaga, Ahmet Aker, Kalina Bontcheva, Maria Liakata, and Rob Procter. 2018. Detection and Resolution of Rumours in Social Media: A Survey. ACM Comput. Surv., Vol. 51, 2, Article 32 (2018), 32:1--32:36 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3161603

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)PositionProceedings of the 41st International Conference on Machine Learning10.5555/3692070.3692243(4329-4344)Online publication date: 21-Jul-2024
  • (2024)The algorithmic knowledge gap within and between countries: Implications for combatting misinformationHarvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review10.37016/mr-2020-155Online publication date: 28-Aug-2024
  • (2024)Investigation of the Misinformation about COVID-19 on YouTube Using Topic Modeling, Sentiment Analysis, and Language AnalysisComputation10.3390/computation1202002812:2(28)Online publication date: 6-Feb-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction  Volume 4, Issue CSCW1
CSCW
May 2020
1285 pages
EISSN:2573-0142
DOI:10.1145/3403424
Issue’s Table of Contents
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 29 May 2020
Published in PACMHCI Volume 4, Issue CSCW1

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. algorithmic audit
  2. conspiracy theory
  3. group fairness
  4. information retrieval
  5. misinformation
  6. misinformation audit
  7. search engines

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)652
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)68
Reflects downloads up to 13 Feb 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)PositionProceedings of the 41st International Conference on Machine Learning10.5555/3692070.3692243(4329-4344)Online publication date: 21-Jul-2024
  • (2024)The algorithmic knowledge gap within and between countries: Implications for combatting misinformationHarvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review10.37016/mr-2020-155Online publication date: 28-Aug-2024
  • (2024)Investigation of the Misinformation about COVID-19 on YouTube Using Topic Modeling, Sentiment Analysis, and Language AnalysisComputation10.3390/computation1202002812:2(28)Online publication date: 6-Feb-2024
  • (2024)Generalising Across Domains in Video Misinformation Detection2024 IST-Africa Conference (IST-Africa)10.23919/IST-Africa63983.2024.10569650(1-8)Online publication date: 20-May-2024
  • (2024)The Video Manipulation Effect (VME): A quantification of the possible impact that the ordering of YouTube videos might have on opinions and voting preferencesPLOS ONE10.1371/journal.pone.030303619:11(e0303036)Online publication date: 20-Nov-2024
  • (2024)The Silicon Ceiling: Auditing GPT’s Race and Gender Biases in HiringProceedings of the 4th ACM Conference on Equity and Access in Algorithms, Mechanisms, and Optimization10.1145/3689904.3694699(1-18)Online publication date: 29-Oct-2024
  • (2024)Lower Quantity, Higher Quality: Auditing News Content and User Perceptions on Twitter/X Algorithmic versus Chronological TimelinesProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36870468:CSCW2(1-25)Online publication date: 8-Nov-2024
  • (2024)"Here's Your Evidence": False Consensus in Public Twitter Discussions of COVID-19 ScienceProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36870108:CSCW2(1-33)Online publication date: 8-Nov-2024
  • (2024)"Something Fast and Cheap" or "A Core Element of Building Trust"? - AI Auditing Professionals' Perspectives on Trust in AIProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36869638:CSCW2(1-22)Online publication date: 8-Nov-2024
  • (2024)Everything We Hear: Towards Tackling Misinformation in PodcastsProceedings of the 26th International Conference on Multimodal Interaction10.1145/3678957.3678959(596-601)Online publication date: 4-Nov-2024
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

Full Access

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media