tutorial

Open access

Embodiment, Presence, and Their Intersections: Teleoperation and Beyond

Authors:

Nicolas Nostadt,

David A. Abbink,

Philipp BeckerleAuthors Info & Claims

ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction (THRI), Volume 9, Issue 4

Article No.: 28, Pages 1 - 19

https://doi.org/10.1145/3389210

Published: 31 May 2020 Publication History

All formats PDF

Abstract

Subjective experience of human control over remote, artificial, or virtual limbs has traditionally been investigated from two separate angles: presence research originates from teleoperation, aiming to capture to what extent the user feels like actually being in the remote or virtual environment. Embodiment captures to what extent a virtual or artificial limb is perceived as one’s own limb. Unfortunately, the two research fields have not interacted much. This survey intends to provide a coherent overview of the literature at the intersection of these two fields to further that interaction. Two rounds of systematic research in topic-related data bases resulted in 414 related articles, 14 of which satisfy the deliberately strict inclusion criteria: 2 theoretical frameworks that highlighted intersections and 12 experimental studies that evaluated subjective measures for both concepts. Considering the surrounding literature as well, theoretical and experimental potential of embodiment and presence are discussed and suggestions to apply them in teleoperation research are derived. While increased publication activity is observed between 2016 and 2018, potentially caused by affordable virtual reality technologies, various open questions remain. To tackle them, human-in-the-loop experiments and three guiding principles for teleoperation system design (mechanical fidelity, spatial bodily awareness, and self-identification) are suggested.

References

[1]

Sun Joo (Grace) Ahn, Amanda Minh Tran Le, and Jeremy Bailenson. 2013. The effect of embodied experiences on self-other merging, attitude, and helping behavior. Media Psychol. 16, 1 (2013), 7--38. arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2012.755877

[2]

Tanja Aitamurto, Shuo Zhou, Sukolsak Sakshuwong, Jorge Saldivar, Yasamin Sadeghi, and Amy Tran. 2018. Sense of presence, attitude change, perspective-taking and usability in first-person split-sphere 360 video. In Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’18). ACM, New York, NY.

Digital Library

[3]

Maryam Alimardani, Shuichi Nishio, and Hiroshi Ishiguro. 2013. Humanlike robot hands controlled by brain activity arouse illusion of ownership in operators. Sci. Rep. 3 (2013), 2396.

[4]

Maryam Alimardani, Shuichi Nishio, and Hiroshi Ishiguro. 2014. Effect of biased feedback on motor imagery learning in BCI-teleoperation system. Front. Syst. Neurosci. 8 (2014), 52.

[5]

Maryam Alimardani, Shuichi Nishio, and Hiroshi Ishiguro. 2016. The importance of visual feedback design in BCIs; from embodiment to motor imagery learning. PloS One 11, 9 (2016), e0161945.

[6]

Luis Almeida, Bruno Patrao, Paulo Menezes, and Jorge Dias. 2014. Be the robot: Human embodiment in tele-operation driving tasks. In Proceedings of the 23rd IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (ROMAN’14). 477--482.

[7]

Douglas G. Altman. 1990. Practical Statistics for Medical Research. Chapman 8 Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, FL.

[8]

Paul Arnold and Martin J. Farrell. 2003. Embodiment and spatial behavior in virtual environments: Comments on Durlach et al. (2000). Presence: Teleoperat. Virtual Environ. 12, 6 (2003), 658--662.

Digital Library

[9]

Domna Banakou, Raphaela Groten, and Mel Slater. 2013. Illusory ownership of a virtual child body causes overestimation of object sizes and implicit attitude changes. Proc. natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 110, 31 (2013), 12846--12851. arXiv:https://www.pnas.org/content/110/31/12846.full.pdf

[10]

Peter Bayliss. 2007. Beings in the game-world: Characters, avatars, and players. In Proceedings of the 4th Australasian Conference on Interactive Entertainment. 4.

[11]

Philipp Beckerle, Claudio Castellini, and Bigna Lenggenhager. 2018. Robotic interfaces for cognitive psychology and embodiment research: A research roadmap. Wiley Interdisc. Rev.: Cogn. Sci. 10(2) (2018), e1486.

[12]

Philipp Beckerle, Oliver Christ, Janis Wojtusch, Jochen Schuy, Kerstin Wolff, Stephan Rinderknecht, Joachim Vogt, and Oskar von Stryk. 2012. Design and control of a robot for the assessment of psychological factors in prosthetic development. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[13]

Philipp Beckerle, Albert De Beir, Tim Schürmann, and Emilie A. Caspar. 2016. Human body schema exploration: Analyzing design requirements of robotic hand and leg illusions. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[14]

Philipp Beckerle, Gionata Salvietti, Ramazan Unal, Domenico Prattichizzo, Simone Rossi, Claudio Castellini, Sandra Hirche, Satoshi Endo, Heni Ben Amor, Matei Ciocarlie, Fulvio Mastrogiovanni, Brenna D. Argall, and Matteo Bianchi. 2017. A human-robot interaction perspective on assistive and rehabilitation robotics. Front. Neurorobot. 11, 24 (2017).

[15]

Frank Biocca. 1997. The Cyborg’s Dilemma: Progressive Embodiment in Virtual Environments. Vol. 3. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos, CA.

[16]

Jana Birkenbusch and Oliver Christ. 2013. Concepts behind serious games and computer-based trainings in health care. In Serious Games and Virtual Worlds in Education, Professional Development, and Healthcare, Klaus Bredl and Wolfgang Bösche (Eds.). IGI Global, 1--14.

[17]

Henri Boessenkool, David A. Abbink, Cock J. M. Heemskerk, Frans C. T. van der Helm, and Jeroen G. W. Wildenbeest. 2013. A task-specific analysis of the benefit of haptic shared control during telemanipulation. IEEE Trans. Haptics 6, 1 (2013), 2--12.

Digital Library

[18]

Matthew. Botvinick and Jonathan Cohen. 1998. Rubber hands “feel” touch that eyes see. Nature 391, 6669 (1998), 756.

[19]

Pierre Bourdin, Josep Maria Tomàs Sanahuja, Carlota Crusafon Moya, Patrick Haggard, and Mel Slater. 2013. Persuading People in a Remote Destination to Sing by Beaming There: Proceedings: Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, October 6-9, 2013. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, New York.

[20]

Filippo Brizzi, Lorenzo Peppoloni, Alessandro Graziano, Erola Di Stefano, Carlo A. Avizzano, and Emanuele Ruffaldi. 2018. Effects of augmented reality on the performance of teleoperated industrial assembly tasks in a robotic embodiment. IEEE Trans. Hum.-Mach. Syst. 48, 2 (April 2018), 197--206.

[21]

Emilie A. Caspar, Albert de Beir, Pedro A. Magalhaes De Saldanha Da Gama, Florence Yernaux, Axel Cleeremans, and Bram Vanderborght. 2015. New frontiers in the rubber hand experiment: When a robotic hand becomes one’s own. Behav. Res. Methods 47, 3 (2015), 744--755.

[22]

Ryad Chellali. 2010. Tele-operation and human robots interactions. In Remote and Telerobotics, Nicolas Mollet (Ed.). InTech, 91--111.

[23]

Oliver Christ, Anna Elger, Katharina Schneider, Philipp Beckerle, Joachim Vogt, and Stephan Rinderknecht. 2013. Identification of haptic paths with different resolution and their effect on body scheme illusion in lower limbs. Technical. Assist. Rehab. (2013).

[24]

Oliver Christ and Miriam Reiner. 2014. Perspectives and possible applications of the rubber hand and virtual hand illusion in non-invasive rehabilitation: Technological improvements and their consequences. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 44 (2014), 33--44.

[25]

Jacob Cohen. 1960. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educat. Psychol. Measure. 20, 1 (1960), 37--46. arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1177/001316446002000104

[26]

Guillaume Cortes, Ferran Argelaguet, Eric Marchand, and Anatole Lécuyer. 2018. Virtual shadows for real humans in a CAVE: Influence on virtual embodiment and 3D interaction. In Proceedings of the 15th ACM Symposium on Applied Perception (SAP’18). ACM, New York, NY.

Digital Library

[27]

Simona Crea, Marco DeAlonzo, Nicola Vitiello, and Christian Cipriani. 2015. The rubber foot illusion. J. NeuroEng. Rehab. 12:77 (2015).

[28]

Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi. 2014. Flow and the Foundations of Positive Psychology. Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht.

[29]

Elisabeth Cuddihy and Deborah Walters. 2000. Embodied interaction in social virtual environments. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference, Elizabeth Churchill and Martin Reddy (Eds.). 181--188.

Digital Library

[30]

Simon Evans. 2012. Virtual selves, real relationships: An exploration of the context and role for social interactions in the emergence of self in virtual environments. Integr. Psychol. Behav. Sci. 46, 4 (2012), 512--528.

[31]

Mareike Flogel, Karl Theodor Kalveram, Oliver Christ, and Joachim Vogt. 2016. Application of the rubber hand illusion paradigm: Comparison between upper and lower limbs. Psychol. Res. 80, 2 (2016), 298--306.

[32]

Terrence Fong, Jennifer Rochlis Zumbado, Nancy Currie, Andrew Mishkin, and David L Akin. 2013. Space telerobotics: Unique challenges to human-robot collaboration in space. Rev. Hum. Factors Ergonom. 9, 1 (2013), 6--56.

[33]

Ana Carol Pontes de França and Marcelo Márcio Soares. 2015. Dialogical self on virtual reality systems: Presence and embodiment in human situated interaction. Procedia Manufactur. 3 (2015), 6444--6450.

[34]

Jakob Fröhner, Philipp Beckerle, Satoshi Endo, and Sandra Hirche. 2019. An embodiment paradigm in evaluation of human-in-the-loop control. IFAC-PapersOnLine (2019).

[35]

Shaun Gallagher. 2005. Dynamic models of body schematic processes. In Body Image and Body Schema, Helena de Preester and Veroniek Knockaert (Eds.). Vol. 62. John Benjamins Publishing Company, Amsterdam, 233--250.

[36]

Shaun Gallagher and Jonathan Cole. 1995. Body schema and body image in a deafferented subject. J. Mind Behav. 16 (1995), 369--390.

[37]

Yiannis Gatsoulis, Gurvinder S. Virk, and Abbas A. Dehghani-Sanij. 2010. On the measurement of situation awareness for effective human-robot interaction in teleoperated systems. J. Cogn. Eng. Decision Mak. 4, 1 (2010), 69--98.

[38]

Michael A. Goodrich, Jacob W. Crandall, and Emilia Barakova. 2013. Teleoperation and beyond for assistive humanoid robots. Rev. Human Factors Ergonom. 9, 1 (2013), 175--226.

[39]

Antal Haans and Wijnand A. Ijsselsteijn. 2012. Embodiment and telepresence: Toward a comprehensive theoretical framework. Interact. Comput. 24, 4 (2012), 211--218.

Digital Library

[40]

Tilo Hartmann, Werner Wirth, Peter Vorderer, Christoph Klimmt, Holger Schramm, and Saskia Böcking. 2015. Spatial Presence Theory: State of the Art and Challenges Ahead. Springer International Publishing, Cham, 115--135.

[41]

Carrie Heeter. 1992. Being there: The subjective experience of presence. Presence: Teleoperat. Virtual Environ. 1, 2 (1992), 262--271.

[42]

Claudia Hendrix and Woodrow Barfield. 1996. Presence within virtual environments as a function of visual display parameters. Presence: Teleoperat. Virtual Environ. 5, 3 (1996), 274--289.

Digital Library

[43]

Marc Herz and Philipp A. Rauschnabel. 2019. Understanding the diffusion of virtual reality glasses: The role of media, fashion and technology. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 138 (2019), 228--242.

[44]

Bettina B. Hoeppner, John F. Kelly, Karen A. Urbanoski, and Valerie Slaymaker. 2011. Comparative utility of a single-item versus multiple-item measure of self-efficacy in predicting relapse among young adults. J. Substance Abuse Treat. 41, 3 (October 2011), 305--312.

[45]

Nicholas P. Holmes and Charles Spence. 2004. The body schema and the multisensory representation(s) of peripersonal space. Cogn. Process. 5 (2) (2004), 94--105.

[46]

Mohamad Arif Fahmi Ismail and Sotaro Shimada. 2016. “Robot” hand illusion under delayed visual feedback: Relationship between the senses of ownership and agency. PloS One 11, 7 (2016), e0159619.

[47]

Marjolein P. M. Kammers, Ineke J. M. van der Ham, and H. Chris Dijkerman. 2006. Dissociating body representations in healthy individuals: Differential effects of a kinaesthetic illusion on perception and action. Neuropsychologia 44, 12 (2006), 2430--2436.

[48]

Sarah Kenderdine, Jeffrey Shaw, and Anita Kocsis. 2009. Dramaturgies of PLACE: Evaluation, embodiment and performance in PLACE-Hampi. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Advances in Computer Enterntainment Technology. 249--256.

Digital Library

[49]

Konstantina Kilteni, Raphaela Groten, and Mel Slater. 2012. The sense of embodiment in virtual reality. Presence: Teleoper. Virtual Environ. 21, 4 (2012), 373--387.

Digital Library

[50]

Elena Kokkinara, Mel Slater, and Joan López-Moliner. 2015. The effects of visuomotor calibration to the perceived space and body, through embodiment in immersive virtual reality. ACM Trans. Appl. Percept. 13, 1 (Oct. 2015).

Digital Library

[51]

Kyo-in Koo, Dae Kwon Park, Yoon Seok Youm, Sung Do Cho, and Chang Ho Hwang. 2018. Enhanced reality showing long-lasting analgesia after total knee arthroplasty: Prospective, randomized clinical trial. Sci. Rep. 8, 1 (2018), 2343.

[52]

J. Richard Landis and Gary G. Koch. 1977. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33, 1 (1977), 159.

[53]

Petri Lankoski. 2016. Embodiment in character-based videogames. In Proceedings of the 20th International Academic Mindtrek Conference (AcademicMindtrek’16). ACM, New York, NY, 358--365.

Digital Library

[54]

Dale A. Lawrence. 1993. Stability and transparency in bilateral teleoperation. IEEE Trans. Robot. Autom. 9, 5 (1993), 624--637.

[55]

Kwan Min Lee. 2004. Presence, explicated. Commun. Theory 14, 1 (2004), 27--50.

[56]

Sangyoon Lee and Gerard Jounghyun Kim. 2008. Effects of haptic feedback, stereoscopy, and image resolution on performance and presence in remote navigation. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Studies 66, 10 (2008), 701--717.

Digital Library

[57]

Bigna Lenggenhager, Tej Tadi, Thomas Metzinger, and Olaf Blanke. 2007. Video ergo sum: Manipulating bodily self-consciousness. Science 317, 5841 (2007), 1096--1099.

[58]

Daniele Leonardis, Antonio Frisoli, Michele Barsotti, Marcello Carrozzino, and Massimo Bergamasco. 2014. Multisensory feedback can enhance embodiment within an enriched virtual walking scenario. Presence: Teleoperat. Virtual Environ. 23, 3 (2014), 253--266.

Digital Library

[59]

Joan Llobera, Maria Victoria Sanchez-Vives, and Mel Slater. 2013. The relationship between virtual body ownership and temperature sensitivity. J. Roy. Soc. Interface 10, 85 (2013), 20130300. arXiv:https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/pdf/10.1098/rsif.2013.0300

[60]

Matthew Lombard and Matthew T. Jones. 2015. Defining presence. In Immersed in Media, Matthew Lombard, Frank Biocca, Jonathan Freeman, Wijnand IJsselsteijn, and Rachel J. Schaevitz (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 13--34.

[61]

Matthew R. Longo, Friederike Schuur, Marjolein P. M. Kammers, Manos Tsakiris, and Patrick Haggard. 2008. What is embodiment? A psychometric approach. Cognition 107, 3 (2008), 978--998.

[62]

Agnes Mayer, Karen Kudar, Karoly Bretz, and Jozsef Tihanyi. 2008. Body schema and body awareness of amputees. Prosthetics and Orthotics International 32 (3) (2008), 363--382.

[63]

Brian E. Mennecke, Janea L. Triplett, Lesya M. Hassall, and Zayira Jordan Conde. 2010. Embodied social presence theory. In Proceedings of the 43rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. 1--10.

Digital Library

[64]

Thomas Metzinger. 2006. Reply to Gallagher: Different conceptions of embodiment. Psyche 12, 4 (2006).

[65]

Marvin Minsky. 1980. Telepresence. Omni (1980), 45--51.

[66]

Betty J. Mohler, Sarah H. Creem-Regehr, William B. Thompson, and Heinrich H. Bülthoff. 2010. The effect of viewing a self-avatar on distance judgments in an HMD-based virtual environment. Presence: Teleoperat. Virtual Environ. 19, 3 (2010), 230--242.

Digital Library

[67]

Selma Musić and Sandra Hirche. 2017. Control sharing in human-robot team interaction. Annu. Rev. Control 44 (2017), 342--354.

[68]

Claudio Pacchierotti, Leonardo Meli, Francesco Chinello, Monica Malvezzi, and Domenico Prattichizzo. 2015. Cutaneous haptic feedback to ensure the stability of robotic teleoperation systems. Int. J. Robot. Res. 34, 14 (2015), 1773--1787.

Digital Library

[69]

Claudio Pacchierotti, Asad Tirmizi, and Domenico Prattichizzo. 2014. Improving transparency in teleoperation by means of cutaneous tactile force feedback. ACM Trans. Appl. Percept. 11, 1 (2014), 1--16.

Digital Library

[70]

Daniel S. Pamungkas and Koren Ward. 2014. Electro-tactile feedback system for achieving embodiment in a tele-operated robot. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Control Automation Robotics 8 Vision (ICARCV’14). 1706--1711.

[71]

Eric Paulos and John Canny. 16-20 May 1998. Designing personal tele-embodiment. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. 3173--3178.

[72]

Eric Paulos and John Canny. 1997. Ubiquitous tele-embodiment: Applications and implications. International J. Hum.-Comput. Studies 46, 6 (1997), 861--877.

Digital Library

[73]

Valeria I. Petkova and H. Henrik Ehrsson. 2008. If I were you: Perceptual illusion of body swapping. PloS One 3, 12 (2008), e3832.

[74]

Fabio Pittarello. 2017. Experimenting with PlayVR, a virtual reality experience for the world of theater. In Proceedings of the 12th Biannual Conference on Italian SIGCHI Chapter (CHItaly’17). ACM, New York, NY.

Digital Library

[75]

Vince Polito, Amanda J. Barnier, and Erik Z. Woody. 2013. Developing the sense of agency rating scale (SOARS): An empirical measure of agency disruption in hypnosis. Conscious. Cogn. 22, 3 (2013), 684--696.

[76]

Stephen C. Pritchard, Regine Zopf, Vince Polito, David M. Kaplan, and Mark A. Williams. 2016. Non-hierarchical influence of visual form, touch, and position cues on embodiment, agency, and presence in virtual reality. Front. Psychol. 7 (2016), 1649.

[77]

Rabindra Ayyan Ratan and Béatrice Hasler. 2009. Self-presence standardized: Introducing the self-presence questionnaire (SPQ). In Proceedings of the 12th Annual International Workshop on Presence.

[78]

Holger Regenbrecht, Cristina Botella, Rosa Baños, and Thomas Schubert. 2017. Mixed reality experience questionnaire (MREQ) -Reference. Info. Sci. Discuss. Papers Ser. No. 2017/01 (2017). Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10523/7151.

[79]

Holger Regenbrecht, Katrin Meng, Arne Reepen, Stephan Beck, and Tobias Langlotz. 2017. Mixed voxel reality: Presence and embodiment in low fidelity, visually coherent, mixed reality environments. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR’17). 90--99.

[80]

Giuseppe Riva, Andrea Gaggioli, and Fabrizia Mantovani. 2008. Are robots present? From motor simulation to being there. Cyberpsychol. Behavior: Impact Internet, Multimed. Virtual Reality Behav. Soc. 11, 6 (2008), 631--636.

[81]

Carine Rognon, Stefano Mintchev, Fabio Dell’Agnola, Alexandre Cherpillod, David Atienza, and Dario Floreano. 2018. FlyJacket: An upper body soft exoskeleton for immersive drone control. IEEE Robot. Autom. Lett. 3, 3 (July 2018), 2362--2369.

[82]

Daniele Romano, Elisa Caffa, Alejandro Hernandez-Arieta, Peter Brugger, and Angelo Maravita. 2015. The robot hand illusion: Inducing proprioceptive drift through visuo-motor congruency. Neuropsychologia 70 (2015), 414--420.

[83]

Richard M. Ryan, C. Scott Rigby, and Andrew Przybylski. 2006. The motivational pull of video games: A self-determination theory approach. Motivat. Emot. 30, 4 (Dec. 2006), 344--360.

[84]

Eva-Lotta Sallnäs, Kirsten Rassmus-Gröhn, and Calle Sjöström. 2000. Supporting presence in collaborative environments by haptic force feedback. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 7, 4 (2000), 461--476.

Digital Library

[85]

Maria V. Sanchez-Vives and Mel Slater. 2005. From presence to consciousness through virtual reality. Nature Rev. Neurosci. 6, 4 (2005), 332--339.

[86]

Thomas Schubert, Frank Friedmann, and Holger Regenbrecht. 2001. The experience of presence: Factor analytic insights. Presence: Teleoperat. Virtual Environ. 10, 3 (2001), 266--281.

Digital Library

[87]

Thomas B. Sheridan. 1995. Teleoperation, telerobotics, and telepresence: A progress report. Control Eng. Pract. 3, 2 (1995), 205--214.

[88]

Donghee Shin. 2018. Empathy and embodied experience in virtual environment: To what extent can virtual reality stimulate empathy and embodied experience?Comput. Hum. Behav. 78 (2018), 64--73.

Digital Library

[89]

Donghee Shin and Frank Biocca. 2018. Exploring immersive experience in journalism. New Media Soc. 20, 8 (2018), 2800--2823. arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444817733133

[90]

Donghee Shin. 2013. Defining sociability and social presence in social TV. Comput. Hum. Behav. 29, 3 (2013), 939--947.

Digital Library

[91]

Mel Slater. 2003. A note on presence terminology. Presence Connect 3, 3 (2003), 1--5.

[92]

Mel Slater, Daniel Perez-Marcos, H. Henrik Ehrsson, and Maria V. Sanchez-Vives. 2008. Towards a digital body: The virtual arm illusion. Front. Human Neurosci. 2 (2008), 6.

[93]

Mel Slater, Bernhard Spanlang, Maria V. Sanchez-Vives, and Olaf Blanke. 2010. First person experience of body transfer in virtual reality. PloS One 5, 5 (2010), e10564.

[94]

Mel Slater, Martin Usoh, and Anthony Steed. 1994. Depth of presence in virtual environments. Presence: Teleoperat. Virtual Environ. 3, 2 (1994), 130--144.

Digital Library

[95]

Anthony Steed, Sebastian Frlston, Maria Murcia Lopez, Jason Drummond, Ye Pan, and David Swapp. [n.d.]. An “in the wild” experiment on presence and embodiment using consumer virtual reality equipment. IEEE Trans. Visual. Comput. Graph. 22, 4 [n.d.], 1406--1414.

[96]

Susumu Tachi. 2015. Telexistence. In Virtual Realities, Guido Brunnett, Sabine Coquillart, Robert van Liere, Gregory Welch, and Libor Vása (Eds.). Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 8844. Springer International Publishing, Cham, 229--259.

[97]

Franco Tecchia, Giovanni Avveduto, Marcello Carrozzino, Raffaelo Brondi, Massimo Bergamasco, and Leila Alem. 2014. [Poster] Interacting with your own hands in a fully immersive MR system. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR’14). 313--314.

[98]

Alexander Toet, Irene A. Kuling, Bouke N. Krom, and Jan B. F. van Erp. 2020. Toward enhanced teleoperation through embodiment. Front. Robot. AI 7 (2020), 14.

[99]

Martin Usoh, Ernest Catena, Sima Arman, and Mel Slater. 2000. Using presence questionnaires in reality. Presence: Teleoperat. Virtual Environ. 9, 5 (2000), 497--503.

Digital Library

[100]

Lloyd V. Wajon, M. M. van Paassen, David A. Abbink, Erwin Boer, and Max Mulder. 2017. Does the projected-hand-illusion help in teleoperation? In Proceedings of the 19th International Symposium on Aviation Psychology.

[101]

Kouichi Watanabe and Susumu Tachi. 2011. Verification of out of body sensations, attribution and localization by interaction with oneself. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on VR Innovation (ISVRI’11). 111--118.

[102]

Jeroen G. W. Wildenbeest, David A. Abbink, Cock J. M. Heemskerk, Frans C. T. Van Der Helm, and Henri Boessenkool. 2013. The impact of haptic feedback quality on the performance of teleoperated assembly tasks. IEEE Trans. Haptics 6, 2 (2013), 242--252.

Digital Library

[103]

Tom Willans, Sue Rivers, and Ekaterina Prasolova-Farland. 2016. Chapter 10—Enactive emotion and presence in virtual environments. In Emotions, Technology, and Behaviors, Sharon Y. Tettegah and Dorothy L. Espelage (Eds.). Academic Press, San Diego, 181--210.

[104]

Margaret Wilson. 2002. Six views of embodied cognition. Psychonom. Bull. Rev. 9, 4 (2002), 625--636. https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.3758/BF03196322.pdf.

[105]

Werner Wirth, Tilo Hartmann, Saskia Backing, Peter Vorderer, Christoph Klimmt, Holger Schramm, Timo Saari, Jari Laarni, Niklas Ravaja, Feliz Ribeiro Gouveia, Frank Biocca, Ana Sacau, Lutz Jancke, Thomas Baumgartner, and Petra Jancke. 2007. A process model of the formation of spatial presence experiences. Media Psychology 9, 3 (2007), 493--525. arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1080/15213260701283079

[106]

Bob G. Witmer, Christian J. Jerome, and Michael J. Singer. 2005. The factor structure of the presence questionnaire. Presence: Teleoperat. Virtual Environ. 14, 3 (2005), 298--312. arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1162/105474605323384654

Digital Library

[107]

Bob G. Witmer and Michael J. Singer. 1998. Measuring presence in virtual environments: A presence questionnaire. Presence: Teleoperat. Virtual Environ. 7, 3 (1998), 225--240.

Digital Library

[108]

Matthias Wölfel and Ulrich Gehmann. 2015. To be there, or not to be there, that is the question. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Cyberworlds (CW’15). 251--258.

Digital Library

Cited By

Molnar JAgrawal VChernova S(2024)Clustering user preferences for personalized teleoperation control schemes via trajectory similarity analysisFrontiers in Robotics and AI10.3389/frobt.2024.133081211Online publication date: 9-Apr-2024
https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2024.1330812
Gloumeau PPettifer S(2024)Exploring Visual Conditions in Virtual Reality for the Teleoperation of RobotsProceedings of the 30th ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology10.1145/3641825.3687750(1-10)Online publication date: 9-Oct-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3641825.3687750
Freeman GHu YPanchanadikar RHall ASchulenberg KLi L(2024)"My Audience Gets to Know Me on a More Realistic Level": Exploring Social VR Streamers’ Unique Strategies to Engage with Their AudiencesExtended Abstracts of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613905.3651036(1-7)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3613905.3651036
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

Embodiment, Presence, and Their Intersections: Teleoperation and Beyond

Recommendations

The benefit of being physically present

The effects of physical embodiment and physical presence were explored through a survey of 33 experimental works comparing how people interacted with physical robots and virtual agents. A qualitative assessment of the direction of quantitative effects ...
Robonaut: A Robot Designed to Work with Humans in Space

The Robotics Technology Branch at the NASA Johnson Space Center is developing robotic systems to assist astronauts in space. One such system, Robonaut, is a humanoid robot with the dexterity approaching that of a suited astronaut. Robonaut currently has ...
Effects of haptic feedback, stereoscopy, and image resolution on performance and presence in remote navigation

Traditionally, the main goal of teleoperation has been to successfully achieve a given task as if performing the task in local space. An emerging and related requirement is to also match the subjective sensation or the user experience of the remote ...

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction

ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction Volume 9, Issue 4

December 2020

192 pages

EISSN:2573-9522

DOI:10.1145/3403615

Editors:
Odest Chadwicke Jenkins
University of Michigan, USA
,
Selma Sabanovic
Indiana University, USA

Issue’s Table of Contents

Copyright © 2020 Owner/Author.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 31 May 2020

Online AM: 07 May 2020

Accepted: 01 March 2020

Revised: 01 March 2020

Received: 01 May 2018

Published in THRI Volume 9, Issue 4

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Tutorial
Research
Refereed

Funding Sources

German Research Foundation (DFG)

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

33
Total Citations
View Citations
2,235
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)592
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)61

Reflects downloads up to 02 Oct 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Molnar JAgrawal VChernova S(2024)Clustering user preferences for personalized teleoperation control schemes via trajectory similarity analysisFrontiers in Robotics and AI10.3389/frobt.2024.133081211Online publication date: 9-Apr-2024
https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2024.1330812
Gloumeau PPettifer S(2024)Exploring Visual Conditions in Virtual Reality for the Teleoperation of RobotsProceedings of the 30th ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology10.1145/3641825.3687750(1-10)Online publication date: 9-Oct-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3641825.3687750
Freeman GHu YPanchanadikar RHall ASchulenberg KLi L(2024)"My Audience Gets to Know Me on a More Realistic Level": Exploring Social VR Streamers’ Unique Strategies to Engage with Their AudiencesExtended Abstracts of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613905.3651036(1-7)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3613905.3651036
Lin YZhang POfek EJe S(2024)ArmDeformation: Inducing the Sensation of Arm Deformation in Virtual Reality Using Skin-StretchingProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642518(1-18)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3613904.3642518
Dwivedi AYu SHao CSalvietti GPrattichizzo DBeckerle P(2024)How Positioning Wearable Haptic Interfaces on Limbs Influences Virtual EmbodimentIEEE Transactions on Haptics10.1109/TOH.2023.334735117:2(292-301)Online publication date: 1-Apr-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1109/TOH.2023.3347351
Caldas OMauledoux MAviles ORodriguez-Guerrero C(2024)Breaking presence in Immersive Virtual Reality toward behavioral and emotional engagementComputer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine10.1016/j.cmpb.2024.108124248(108124)Online publication date: May-2024
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmpb.2024.108124
Cisneros-Limón RDallard ABenallegue MKaneko KKaminaga HGergondet PTanguy ASingh RSun LChen YFournier CLorthioir GTsuru MChefchaouni-Moussaoui SOsawa YCaron GChappellet KMorisawa MEscande AAyusawa KHouhou YKumagai IOno MShirasaka KWada SWada HKanehiro FKheddar A(2024)A Cybernetic Avatar System to Embody Human Telepresence for Connectivity, Exploration, and Skill TransferInternational Journal of Social Robotics10.1007/s12369-023-01096-9Online publication date: 29-Jan-2024
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-023-01096-9
Lora Millán JLora Millán J(2024)Conclusions and Future DirectionsControl Strategies for Robotic Exoskeletons to Assist Post-Stroke Hemiparetic Gait10.1007/978-3-031-57616-4_5(117-124)Online publication date: 6-Jun-2024
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-57616-4_5
Lora Millán JLora Millán J(2024)Introduction to Healthy and Post-Stroke Gait and Robotic Gait AssistanceControl Strategies for Robotic Exoskeletons to Assist Post-Stroke Hemiparetic Gait10.1007/978-3-031-57616-4_1(1-43)Online publication date: 6-Jun-2024
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-57616-4_1
Borgwardt MBoueke JSanabria MBonfert MPorzel R(2023)VRisbee: How Hand Visibility Impacts Throwing Accuracy and Experience in Virtual RealityExtended Abstracts of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3544549.3585868(1-7)Online publication date: 19-Apr-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3544549.3585868
Show More Cited By

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

Get Access

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Article

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Issue’s Table of Contents