Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
research-article

Computational Aesthetic Evaluation of Logos

Published: 29 June 2017 Publication History

Abstract

Computational aesthetics has become an active research field in recent years, but there have been few attempts in computational aesthetic evaluation of logos. In this article, we restrict our study on black-and-white logos, which are professionally designed for name-brand companies with similar properties, and apply perceptual models of standard design principles in computational aesthetic evaluation of logos. We define a group of metrics to evaluate some aspects in design principles such as balance, contrast, and harmony of logos. We also collect human ratings of balance, contrast, harmony, and aesthetics of 60 logos from 60 volunteers. Statistical linear regression models are trained on this database using a supervised machine-learning method. Experimental results show that our model-evaluated balance, contrast, and harmony have highly significant correlation of over 0.87 with human evaluations on the same dimensions. Finally, we regress human-evaluated aesthetics scores on model-evaluated balance, contrast, and harmony. The resulted regression model of aesthetics can predict human judgments on perceived aesthetics with a high correlation of 0.85. Our work provides a machine-learning-based reference framework for quantitative aesthetic evaluation of graphic design patterns and also the research of exploring the relationship between aesthetic perceptions of human and computational evaluation of design principles extracted from graphic designs.

References

[1]
F. Attneave. 1954. Some informational aspects of visual perception. Psychol. Rev. 61, 3 (May. 1954), 183--193.
[2]
M. Bar and M. Neta. 2006. Humans prefer curved visual objects. Psychol. Sci. 17, 8 (Aug. 2006), 645--648.
[3]
A. Bryman and D. Cramer. 2011. Quantitative Data Analysis with IBM SPSS 17,18 and 19: A Guide for Social Scientists (1st. ed.). Routledge Press, New York, NY.
[4]
S. Dhar, V. Ordonez, and T. L. Berg. 2011. High level describable attributes for predicting aesthetics and interestingness. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR’11). IEEE, Washington, DC, 1657--1664.
[5]
W. Dubitzky, M. Granzow, and D. P. Berrar. 2007. Fundamentals of Data Mining in Genomics and Proteomics (1st. ed.). Springer, New York, NY.
[6]
J. Feldman and M. Singh. 2005. Information along contours and object boundaries. Psychol. Rev. 112, 1 (Jan. 2005), 243--252.
[7]
P. A. Fishwick. 2008. Aesthetic Computing. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
[8]
P. Galanter. 2012. Computational aesthetic evaluation: Steps towards machine creativity. In Proceedings of ACM SIGGRAPH Courses (SIGGRAPH’12). ACM Press, New York, NY, Article 14, 162 pages.
[9]
E. Garces, A. Agarwala, D. Gutierrez, and A. Hertzmann. 2014. A similarity measure for illustration style. ACM Trans. Graph. 33, 4, Article 93 (July 2014), 9 pages.
[10]
X. C. He and N. H. C. Yung. 2004. Curvature scale space corner detector with adaptive threshold and dynamic region of support. In Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR’04). IEEE, WaShington, DC, 791--794.
[11]
P. W. Henderson and J. A. Cote. 1998. Guidelines for selecting or modifying logos. J. Market. 62, 2 (Apr. 1998), 14--30.
[12]
F. Hoenig. 2005. Defining computational aesthetics. In Proceedings of the First Eurographics Conference on Computational Aesthetics in Graphics, Visualization and Imaging (CAe’05). Eurographics Association Aire-la-Ville, Switzerland, 13--18.
[13]
Y. Ke, X. Tang, and F. Jing. 2006. The design of high-level features for photo quality assessment. In Proceedings of the IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR’06). IEEE, Washington, DC, 419--426.
[14]
L. F. Laursen, Y. Koyama, H. T. Chen, E. Garces, D. Gutierrez, R. Harper, and T. Igarashi. 2016. Icon set selection via human computation. In Pacific Graphics Short Papers (PG’16). The Eurographics Association.
[15]
C. Li and T. Chen. 2009. Aesthetic visual quality assessment of paintings. IEEE J. Select. Top. Signal Process. 3, 2 (Apr. 2009), 236--252.
[16]
Y.-N. Li, K. Zhang, Y. J. Fu, and D. J. Li. 2014. Rule-based automatic generation of logo designs. Leonardo 0, 0 (Nov. 2014), 173--177.
[17]
W. H. Liao and P. M. Chen. 2014. Analysis of visual elements in logo design. In Proceedings of the 12th International Symposium on Smart Graphics (SG’14). Springer, Switzerland, 73--85.
[18]
P. Obrador, M. A. Saad, P. Suryanarayan, and N. Oliver. 2012. Towards category-based aesthetic models of photographs. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Multimedia Modeling (MMM’12). Springer, Switzerland, 63--76.
[19]
P. O’Donovan, J. Libeks, A. Agarwala, and A. Hertzmann. 2014. Exploratory font selection using crowdsourced attributes. ACM Trans. Graph. 33, 4, Article 92 (July 2014), 9 pages.
[20]
D. L. Page, A. F. Koschan, S. R. Sukumar, B. Roui-Abidi, and M. A. Abidi. 2003. Shape analysis algorithm based on information theory. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP’03). IEEE, Washington, DC, 229--234.
[21]
R. Rauschenberger, J. J.-W. Lin, X. S. Zheng, and C. Lafleur. 2009. Subset search for icons of different spatial frequencies. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting (HFES’09). SAGE, Thousand Oaks, CA, 1101--1105.
[22]
R. Reber, N. Schwarz, and P. Winkielman. 2004. Processing fluency and aesthetic pleasure: Is beauty in the perceivers processing experience? Pers. Soc. Psychol. Rev. 8, 4 (Feb. 2004), 364--382.
[23]
K. Reinecke, T. Yeh, L. Miratrix, R. Mardiko, Y. Zhao, J. Liu, and K. Z. Gajos. 2013. Predicting users’ first impressions of website aesthetics with a quantification of perceived visual complexity and colorfulness. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’13). ACM, New York, NY, 2049--2058.
[24]
B. Saleh, M. Dontcheva, A. Hertzmann, and Z. Liu. 2015. Learning style similarity for searching infographics. In Proceedings of the 41st Graphics Interface Conference (GI’15). Canadian Information Processing Society, Toronto, Canada, 59--64. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2788890.2788902
[25]
A. Sartori, V. Yanulevskaya, A. A. Salah, J. Uijlings, E. Bruni, and N. Sebe. 2015. Affective analysis of professional and amateur abstract paintings using statistical analysis and art theory. ACM Trans. Interact. Intell. Syst. 5, 2, Article 8 (July 2015), 27 pages.
[26]
C. E. Shannon. 1948. A mathematical theory of communication. Bell Syst. Techn. J. 27, 3 (Oct. 1948), 379--423.
[27]
S. Thumfart, R. H. A. H. Jacobs, E. Lughofer, C. Eitzinger, F. W. Cornelissen, W. Groissboeck, and R. Richter. 2011. Modeling human aesthetic perception of visual textures. ACM Trans. Appl. Percept. 8, 4, Article 27 (November 2011), 29 pages.
[28]
C. Wallraven, D. Cunningham, and J. Rigau. 2009. Aesthetic appraisal of art-from eye movements to computers. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Computational Aesthetics in Graphics, Visualization and Imaging (CAe’09). Eurographics Association, Switzerland, 137--144.
[29]
Q. Wang. 2009. Statistical analysis on the enterprise logo color designs of global 500. In Proceedings of the IEEE 10th International Conference on Computer-Aided Industrial Design8Conceptual Design (CAID8CD’09). IEEE, Washington, DC, 277--280.
[30]
A. W. White. 2011. The Elements of Graphic Design (2nd. ed.). Allworth Press, New York, NY.
[31]
L. K. Wong and K. L. Low. 2009. Saliency-enhanced image aesthetics class prediction. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP’09). IEEE, Washington, DC, 997--1000.
[32]
X. S. Zheng, I. Chakraborty, J. J.-W. Lin, and R. Rauschenberger. 2009. Correlating low-level lmage statistics with users’ rapid aesthetic and affective judgments of web pages. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’09). ACM, New York, NY, 1--10.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Modern graphic design application innovation based on graphic abstract processing methodApplied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences10.2478/amns-2024-12969:1Online publication date: 30-May-2024
  • (2024)Examining How the Large Language Models Impact the Conceptual Design with Human Designers: A Comparative Case StudyInternational Journal of Human–Computer Interaction10.1080/10447318.2024.2370635(1-17)Online publication date: Jul-2024
  • (2024)The application and impact of artificial intelligence technology in graphic design: A critical interpretive synthesisHeliyon10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e4003710:21(e40037)Online publication date: Nov-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Transactions on Applied Perception
ACM Transactions on Applied Perception  Volume 14, Issue 3
July 2017
148 pages
ISSN:1544-3558
EISSN:1544-3965
DOI:10.1145/3066910
Issue’s Table of Contents
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 29 June 2017
Accepted: 01 March 2017
Revised: 01 February 2017
Received: 01 January 2016
Published in TAP Volume 14, Issue 3

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Computational aesthetics
  2. design principle
  3. evaluation
  4. human judgments
  5. logo designs

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Research
  • Refereed

Funding Sources

  • Science and Technology on Electro-optic Control Laboratory
  • Zhejiang University, and Aeronautical Science Foundation of China
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China
  • Key Technologies R8D Program
  • Open Project Program of the State Key Lab of CAD8CG

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)60
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)8
Reflects downloads up to 19 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Modern graphic design application innovation based on graphic abstract processing methodApplied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences10.2478/amns-2024-12969:1Online publication date: 30-May-2024
  • (2024)Examining How the Large Language Models Impact the Conceptual Design with Human Designers: A Comparative Case StudyInternational Journal of Human–Computer Interaction10.1080/10447318.2024.2370635(1-17)Online publication date: Jul-2024
  • (2024)The application and impact of artificial intelligence technology in graphic design: A critical interpretive synthesisHeliyon10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e4003710:21(e40037)Online publication date: Nov-2024
  • (2023)Understanding Design Collaboration Between Designers and Artificial Intelligence: A Systematic Literature ReviewProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36102177:CSCW2(1-35)Online publication date: 4-Oct-2023
  • (2023)Optimization Design of Product Form Driven by Image Cognitive FrictionIEEE Access10.1109/ACCESS.2023.332981011(124278-124294)Online publication date: 2023
  • (2023)Research on the correlation mechanism between eye-tracking data and aesthetic ratings in product aesthetic evaluationJournal of Engineering Design10.1080/09544828.2023.217266234:1(55-80)Online publication date: 5-Feb-2023
  • (2022)On the Prediction of Product Aesthetic Evaluation Based on Hesitant-Fuzzy Cognition and Neural NetworkComplexity10.1155/2022/84075212022Online publication date: 1-Jan-2022
  • (2022)Design of Visual Communication Effect Evaluation Method of Artworks Based on Machine LearningMobile Information Systems10.1155/2022/45661852022Online publication date: 1-Jan-2022
  • (2022)Clustering- and Transformer-Based Networks for the Style Analysis of Logo ImagesComputational Intelligence and Neuroscience10.1155/2022/20907122022Online publication date: 1-Jan-2022
  • (2022)SmartShots: An Optimization Approach for Generating Videos with Data Visualizations EmbeddedACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems10.1145/348450612:1(1-21)Online publication date: 4-Mar-2022
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

Full Access

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media