Rolling in Fun, Paying the Price: A Thematic Analysis on Purchase and Play in Tabletop Games
Authors: 
Joseph Tu, 
Derrick Wang, 
Lydia Choong, Aj Abistado, Ally Suarez, 
Stuart Hallifax, 
Katja Rogers, 
Lennart NackeAuthors Info & Claims
Article No.: 1, Pages 1 - 29
Abstract
The tabletop games industry has experienced remarkable growth in recent years. A deeper exploration of the factors motivating players to invest time and money in these games would help game companies better cater to their target audience and increase profits. We conducted a reflexive thematic analysis of 20 semi-structured interviews with tabletop game players. Our analysis revealed five themes concerning purchasing decision influences: (1) childhood past experiences and cultural norms, (2) representation and inclusivity, (3) social connections and shared fun, (4) overcoming gameplay hindrances with digital assistance, and (5) economic constraints. These findings suggest that game companies should focus on presenting easily understandable information, minimizing idle time, and exploring opportunities for inclusivity in digital interactions to effectively engage players and drive sales. Based on our valuable insights into player motivations, we offer actionable recommendations for the tabletop games industry.
References
[1]
Pål André Aarsand. 2007. Computer and video games in family life: The digital divide as a resource in intergenerational interactions. Childhood 14, 2 (May 2007), 235–256.
[2]
Brett L. Abarbanel. 2014. Differences in motivational dimensions across gambling frequency, game choice and medium of play in the United Kingdom. International Gambling Studies 14, 3 (2014), 472–491.
[3]
Abdullah Al Mahmud, Omar Mubin, Johanna Renny Octavia, Suleman Shahid, LeeChin Yeo, Panos Markopoulos, Jean-Bernard Martens, and Dima Aliakseyeu. 2007. Affective tabletop game: A new gaming experience for children. In Proceedings of the 2nd Annual IEEE International Workshop on Horizontal Interactive Human-Computer Systems(TABLETOP’07). IEEE, 44–51.
[4]
Abdullah Al Mahmud, Omar Mubin, Suleman Shahid, and Jean-Bernard Martens. 2008. Designing and evaluating the tabletop game experience for senior citizens. In Proceedings of the 5th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Building Bridges(NordiCHI’08). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 403–406.
[5]
SkyQuest Advanced Business Intelligence, Research & Analysis Wing. 2021. Board Games Market Size, Share, Growth Analysis, by Game Type (Monopoly, Scrabble, Chess, Puzzles), by Distribution Channel (Specialty Stores, Online Stores, Hypermarkets & Supermarkets, Other Convenience Stores), by Game Theme (Strategy & War, Educational, Fantasy Games, Sports), by Region—Industry Forecast 2024–2031. Technical Report SQMIG25J2057. SkyQuest Technology Group.
[6]
Harvir S. Bansal and Peter A. Voyer. 2000. Word-of-mouth processes within a services purchase decision context. Journal of Service Research 3, 2 (Nov. 2000), 166–177.
[7]
Kristian Beckers and Sebastian Pape. 2016. A serious game for eliciting social engineering security requirements. In Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE 24th International Requirements Engineering Conference(RE’16). IEEE, 16–25.
[8]
Benoit Bediou, Deanne M. Adams, Richard E. Mayer, Elizabeth Tipton, C. Shawn Green, and Daphne Bavelier. 2018. Meta-analysis of action video game impact on perceptual, attentional, and cognitive skills. Psychological Bulletin 144, 1 (Jan. 2018), 77–110.
[9]
Axel Berndt, Simon Waloschek, Aristotelis Hadjakos, and Alexander Leemhuis. 2017. AmbiDice: An ambient music interface for tabletop role-playing games. In Proceedings of the International Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression(NIME’17). 241–244.
[10]
Leonardo Bonanni, Cati Vaucelle, Jeff Lieberman, and Orit Zuckerman. 2006. PlayPals: Tangible interfaces for remote communication and play. In CHI’06 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI EA’06). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 574–579.
[11]
Roel H. Bosma, Tran T. Phung Ha, Tong Quoc Hiep, Nguyen T. Huynh Phuong, Arend Ligtenberg, Romina Rodela, and Arnold K. Bregt. 2020. Changing opinion, knowledge, skill and behaviour of Vietnamese shrimp farmers by using serious board games. Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension 26, 2 (2020), 203–221.
[12]
Richard E. Boyatzis. 1998. Transforming Qualitative Information: Thematic Analysis and Code Development. SAGE, Thousand Oaks, CA, USA.
[13]
Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2019. Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health 11, 4 (2019), 589–597.
[14]
Stéphanie Buisine, Guillaume Besacier, Améziane Aoussat, and Frédéric Vernier. 2012. How do interactive tabletop systems influence collaboration? Computers in Human Behavior 28, 1 (2012), 49–59.
[15]
Xinyuan Cai. 2009. Principles of human-computer interaction in game design. In Proceedings of the 2009 2nd International Symposium on Computational Intelligence and Design, Vol. 2. IEEE, 92–95.
[16]
Edward Castronova and Isaac Knowles. 2015. A model of climate policy using board game mechanics. International Journal of Serious Games 2, 3 (July 2015), 41–62.
[17]
Vivian Hsueh-Hua Chen, Weirong Lin, Michael Haller, Jakob Leitner, and Henry Been-Lirn Duh. 2009. Communicative behaviors and flow experience in tabletop gaming. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Advances in Computer Entertainment Technology(ACE’09). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 281–286.
[18]
Darrin F. Coe. 2017. Why people play table-top role-playing games: A grounded theory of becoming as motivation. Qualitative Report 22, 11 (2017), 2844–2863.
[19]
Sarah M. Coyne, Laura M. Padilla-Walker, Laura Stockdale, and Randal D. Day. 2011. Game on... girls: Associations between co-playing video games and adolescent behavioral and family outcomes. Journal of Adolescent Health 49, 2 (Aug. 2011), 160–165.
[20]
Liam Cross, Andrea Piovesan, Micael Sousa, Peter Wright, and Gray Atherton. 2023. Your move: An open access dataset of over 1500 board gamer’s demographics, preferences and motivations. Simulation & Gaming 54, 5 (Oct. 2023), 554–575.
[21]
Teresa De la Hera, Eugène Loos, Monique Simons, and Joleen Blom. 2017. Benefits and factors influencing the design of intergenerational digital games: A systematic literature review. Societies 7, 3 (2017), Article 18, 15 pages.
[22]
Nicola Dell, Vidya Vaidyanathan, Indrani Medhi, Edward Cutrell, and William Thies. 2012. “Yours is better!”: Participant response bias in HCI. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI’12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1321–1330.
[23]
Christoph Sebastian Deterding. 2016. Toward economic platform studies. In Proceedings of the 12th Annual Game Research Lab Spring Seminar “Money and Games.” 1–19.
[24]
Elizabeth Evans. 2016. The economics of free: Freemium games, branding and the impatience economy. Convergence 22, 6 (Dec. 2016), 563–580.
[25]
Lucas Ferreira, Levi Lelis, and Jim Whitehead. 2020. Computer-generated music for tabletop role-playing games. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Interactive Digital Entertainment, Vol. 16.59–65.
[26]
Aroutis Foster. 2008. Games and motivation to learn science: Personal identity, applicability, relevance and meaningfulness. Journal of Interactive Learning Research 19, 4 (2008), 597–614.
[27]
Guo Freeman, Karen Wu, Nicholas Nower, and Donghee Yvette Wohn. 2022. Pay to win or pay to cheat: How players of competitive online games perceive fairness of in-game purchases. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 6, CHI PLAY (2022), 1–24.
[28]
Sally M. Gainsbury, Daniel L. King, Alex M. T. Russell, and Paul Delfabbro. 2016. Who pays to play freemium games? The profiles and motivations of players who make purchases within social casino games. Journal of Behavioral Addictions 5, 2 (2016), 221–230.
[29]
Simran K. Ghoman, Siddhi D. Patel, Maria Cutumisu, Patrick von Hauff, Thomas Jeffery, Matthew R. G. Brown, and Georg M. Schmölzer. 2020. Serious games, a game changer in teaching neonatal resuscitation? A review. Archives of Disease in Childhood-Fetal and Neonatal Edition 105, 1 (2020), 98–107.
[30]
Robin S. Gregory and Theresa A. Satterfield. 2002. Beyond perception: The experience of risk and stigma in community contexts. Risk Analysis 22, 2 (2002), 347–358.
[31]
Greg Guest, Kathleen M. MacQueen, and Emily E. Namey. 2012. Applied Thematic Analysis. SAGE, Thousand Oaks, CA, USA.
[32]
Gloria G. Guzman. 2022. Household Income: 2021. Technical Report ACSBR-011. United States Census Bureau, New York, NY, USA. https://www.census.gov/library/publications/2022/acs/acsbr-011.html
[33]
Juho Hamari, Nicolai Hanner, and Jonna Koivisto. 2020. “Why pay premium in freemium services?” A study on perceived value, continued use and purchase intentions in free-to-play games. International Journal of Information Management 51 (2020), 102040.
[34]
Kathy L. Hamilton and Miriam Catterall. 2005. Towards a better understanding of the low income consumer. Advances in Consumer Research 32, 1 (2005), 627–632.
[35]
Stephen Hart, Andrea Margheri, Federica Paci, and Vladimiro Sassone. 2020. Riskio: A serious game for cyber security awareness and education. Computers & Security 95 (2020), 101827.
[36]
Monique M. Hennink, Bonnie N. Kaiser, and Vincent C. Marconi. 2017. Code saturation versus meaning saturation: How many interviews are enough? Qualitative Health Research 27, 4 (2017), 591–608.
[37]
Catherine Hu, Christopher Perdriau, Christopher Mendez, Caroline Gao, Abrar Fallatah, and Margaret Burnett. 2021. Toward a socioeconomic-aware HCI: Five facets. arXiv:2108.13477 (2021).
[38]
M. Louise Humbert, Karen E. Chad, Kevin S. Spink, Nazeem Muhajarine, Kristal D. Anderson, Mark W. Bruner, Tammy M. Girolami, Patrick Odnokon, and Catherine R. Gryba. 2006. Factors that influence physical activity participation among high-and low-SES youth. Qualitative Health Research 16, 4 (2006), 467–483.
[39]
David Mark Hummon. 1990. Commonplaces: Community Ideology and Identity in American Culture. Suny Press, New York, NY, USA.
[40]
Andri Ioannou. 2018. A model of gameful design for learning using interactive tabletops: Enactment and evaluation in the socio-emotional education classroom. Educational Technology Research and Development 67 (2018), 277–302.
[41]
Ajay Jain. 2024. In-game advertising and brand purchase intentions: An SOR perspective. Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication 73, 1–2 (2024), 24–44.
[42]
Ville Kankainen and Janne Paavilainen. 2019. Hybrid board game design guidelines. In Proceedings of the DiGRA 2019 Conference. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 22.
[43]
Ville Kankainen and Heikki Tyni. 2014. Understanding smart device tabletop games. In Proceedings of the 18th International Academic MindTrek Conference: Media Business, Management, Content and Services. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 238–241.
[44]
Daniel L. King and Paul H. Delfabbro. 2018. Predatory monetization schemes in video games (e.g. ‘loot boxes’) and internet gaming disorder. Addiction 113, 11 (2018), 3.
[45]
Mehmet Kosa and Pieter Spronck. 2018. What tabletop players think about augmented tabletop games: A content analysis. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on the Foundations of Digital Games(FDG’18). 1–8.
[46]
Mehmet Kosa and Pieter Spronck. 2019. Towards a tabletop gaming motivations inventory (TGMI). In Videogame Sciences and Arts. Communications in Computer and Information Science, Vol. 1164. Springer, 59–71.
[47]
Myungho Lee, Nahal Norouzi, G. Bruder, P. Wisniewski, and G. Welch. 2019. Mixed reality tabletop gameplay: Social interaction with a virtual human capable of physical influence. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 27 (2019), 3534–3545.
[48]
Dale Leorke. 2018. Solo Board Gaming: An Analysis of Player Motivations. Retrieved October 1, 2024 from https://analoggamestudies.org/2018/12/solo-board-gaming-an-analysis-of-player-motivations/
[49]
Long-Yi Lin and Ching-Yuh Lu. 2010. The influence of corporate image, relationship marketing, and trust on purchase intention: The moderating effects of word-of-mouth. Tourism Review 65, 3 (2010), 19.
[50]
Conor Linehan, Shaun Lawson, and Mark Doughty. 2009. Tabletop prototyping of serious games for ‘soft skills’ training. In Proceedings of the 2009 Conference in Games and Virtual Worlds for Serious Applications. IEEE, 182–185.
[51]
Chuang-Chun Liu. 2017. A model for exploring players flow experience in online games. Information Technology & People 30 (2017), 139–162.
[52]
Sally M. Gainsbury, Nerilee Hing, Paul H. Delfabbro, and Daniel L. King. 2014. A taxonomy of gambling and casino games via social media and online technologies. International Gambling Studies 14, 2 (2014), 196–213.
[53]
Joseph Macey and Juho Hamari. 2018. Investigating relationships between video gaming, spectating esports, and gambling. Computers in Human Behavior 80 (2018), 344–353.
[54]
Carsten Magerkurth, Maral Memisoglu, Timo Engelke, and Norbert Streitz. 2004. Towards the next generation of tabletop gaming experiences. In Proceedings of Graphics Interface 2004. 73–80.
[55]
Regan L. Mandryk and Diego S. Maranan. 2002. False prophets: Exploring hybrid board/video games. In CHI’02 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 640–641.
[56]
Carlos Martinho and Micael Sousa. 2023. CSSII: A player motivation model for tabletop games. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on the Foundations of Digital Games(FDG’23). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 13, 10 pages.
[57]
Banwari Mittal. 1989. Measuring purchase-decision involvement. Psychology & Marketing 6, 2 (1989), 147–162.
[58]
S. Molinillo, Francisco Muñoz-Leiva, and Fátima Pérez-García. 2018. The effects of human-game interaction, network externalities, and motivations on players’ use of mobile casual games. Industrial Management & Data Systems 118 (2018), 1766–1786.
[59]
Christian Montag, Bernd Lachmann, Marc Herrlich, and Katharina Zweig. 2019. Addictive features of social media/messenger platforms and freemium games against the background of psychological and economic theories. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 16, 14 (2019), 2612.
[60]
Erica L. Neely. 2019. Come for the game, stay for the cash grab: The ethics of loot boxes, microtransactions, and freemium games. Games and Culture 16 (2019), 228–247.
[61]
Dennis K. Orthner, Hinckley Jones-Sanpei, and Sabrina Williamson. 2004. The resilience and strengths of low-income families. Family Relations 53, 2 (2004), 159–167.
[62]
Sanela Osmanovic and Loretta Pecchioni. 2016. Beyond entertainment: Motivations and outcomes of video game playing by older adults and their younger family members. Games and Culture 11, 1–2 (2016), 130–149.
[63]
Rafael R. Padovani, Lucas N. Ferreira, and Levi H. S. Lelis. 2017. Bardo: Emotion-based music recommendation for tabletop role-playing games. In Proceedings of the 13th Artificial Intelligence and Interactive Digital Entertainment Conference. 7.
[64]
Joseph A. Pape. 2012. The Effects of Digitization and Automation on Board Games for Digital Tabletops. Ph.D. Thesis. Queen’s University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
[65]
Terri Toles Patkin. 2020. Who’s in the Game?: Identity and Intersectionality in Classic Board Games. McFarland, Jefferson, NC, USA.
[66]
John E. Puddifoot. 1995. Dimensions of community identity. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology 5, 5 (Dec. 1995), 357–370.
[67]
Nasam Ramya and S. Mohamed Ali. 2016. Factors affecting consumer buying behavior. International Journal of Applied Research 2, 10 Part B (2016), 76–80.
[68]
Marleen Relling, Oliver Schnittka, Henrik Sattler, and Marius Johnen. 2016. Each can help or hurt: Negative and positive word of mouth in social network brand communities. International Journal of Research in Marketing 33, 1 (March 2016), 42–58.
[69]
Melissa J. Rogerson and Martin R. Gibbs. 2018. Finding time for tabletop: Board game play and parenting. Games and Culture 13, 3 (May 2018), 280–300.
[70]
Melissa J. Rogerson, Martin R. Gibbs, and Wally Smith. 2018. Cooperating to compete: The mutuality of cooperation and competition in boardgame play. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI’18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 193, 13 pages.
[71]
Melissa J. Rogerson, Claudia R. R. McHarg, and Eleanor I. R. McHarg. 2019. Escaping with the family: Cooperation and collaboration in a single-use boardgame. Well Played: A Journal on Video Games, Value and Meaning 8, 2 (Sept. 2019), 49–88.
[72]
Melissa J. Rogerson, Lucy A. Sparrow, and Sophie O. Freeman. 2023. Escaping the laboratorium of Dr Moustache: Learning about distanced play through game design. In Proceedings of the 2023 DiGRA Australia National Conference. 1–5. https://digraa.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/2023-CAMERA-READY_Melissa-Rogerson.pdf
[73]
Melissa J. Rogerson, Lucy A. Sparrow, and Martin R. Gibbs. 2021. Unpacking “boardgames with apps”: The hybrid digital boardgame model. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI’21). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 111, 17 pages.
[74]
Ari Schlesinger, W. Keith Edwards, and Rebecca E. Grinter. 2017. Intersectional HCI: Engaging identity through gender, race, and class. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI’17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 5412–5427.
[75]
Adrienne Shaw. 2010. What is video game culture? Cultural studies and game studies. Games and Culture 5, 4 (Oct. 2010), 403–424.
[76]
Susan M. Shaw, Mark E. Havitz, and Fern M. Delemere. 2008. “I decided to invest in my kids’ memories”: Family vacations, memories, and the social construction of the family. Tourism Culture & Communication 8, 1 (April 2008), 13–26.
[77]
Sinem Siyahhan, Sasha A. Barab, and Michael P. Downton. 2010. Using activity theory to understand intergenerational play: The case of family quest. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning 5, 4 (Dec. 2010), 415–432.
[78]
Katherine Taken Smith. 2011. Digital marketing strategies that millennials find appealing, motivating, or just annoying. Journal of Strategic Marketing 19, 6 (2011), 489–499.
[79]
Micael Sousa. 2021. Serious board games: Modding existing games for collaborative ideation processes. International Journal of Serious Games 8, 2 (June 2021), 129–146.
[80]
Tess Speelpenning, Alissa N. Antle, Tanja Doering, and Elise van den Hoven. 2011. Exploring how tangible tools enable collaboration in a multi-touch tabletop game. In Human-Computer Interaction—INTERACT 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 6947. Springer, 605–621.
[81]
Constance A. Steinkuehler. 2006. Why game (culture) studies now? Games and Culture 1, 1 (Jan. 2006), 97–102.
[82]
Elizabeth Stowell, Mercedes C. Lyson, Herman Saksono, Reneé C. Wurth, Holly Jimison, Misha Pavel, and Andrea G. Parker. 2018. Designing and evaluating mhealth interventions for vulnerable populations: A systematic review. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI’18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 15, 17 pages.
[83]
Hayden T. Thorne, Jordan J. Smith, Philip J. Morgan, Mark J. Babic, and David R. Lubans. 2014. Video game genre preference, physical activity and screen-time in adolescent boys from low-income communities. Journal of Adolescence 37, 8 (Dec. 2014), 1345–1352.
[84]
Joseph Tu. 2024. Casting connections: A fishy approach to conference engagement. In Extended Abstracts of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI EA’24). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 638, 1 page.
[85]
Joseph Tu and Ekaterina Durmanova. 2020. Curioscape: A curiosity-driven escape room board game. In Extended Abstracts of the 2020 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play(CHI PLAY’20). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 94–97.
[86]
Joseph Tu, Derrick M. Wang, Ekaterina Durmanova, and Lennart E. Nacke. 2023. LEVI: Exploring possibilities for an adaptive board game system. In Companion Proceedings of the Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play(CHI PLAY Companion’23). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 181–186.
[87]
Elise van den Hoven and Ali Mazalek. 2011. Grasping gestures: Gesturing with physical artifacts. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing 25, 3 (2011), 255–271.
[88]
Frank Vetere, Hilary Davis, Martin Gibbs, and Steve Howard. 2009. The magic box and collage: Responding to the challenge of distributed intergenerational play. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 67, 2 (Feb. 2009), 165–178.
[89]
John Vines, Róisín McNaney, Stephen Lindsay, Jayne Wallace, and John McCarthy. 2014. Special topic: Designing for and with vulnerable people. Interactions 21, 1 (Jan. 2014), 44–46.
[90]
Dhaval Vyas. 2020. Life improvements: DIY in low socio-economic status communities. In Companion Publication of the 2020 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing(CSCW’20 Companion). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 407–412.
[91]
Dhaval Vyas and Tawanna Dillahunt. 2017. Everyday resilience: Supporting resilient strategies among low socioeconomic status communities. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 1, CSCW (Dec. 2017), Article 105, 21 pages.
[92]
James R. Wallace, Joseph Pape, Yu-Ling Betty Chang, Phillip J. McClelland, T. C. Nicholas Graham, Stacey D. Scott, and Mark Hancock. 2012. Exploring automation in digital tabletop board game. In Proceedings of the ACM 2012 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work Companion(CSCW’12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 231–234.
[93]
Cocuhen Wu and Ting-Ya Wang. 2024. How can game companies with cause-related marketing effectively guide players to engage in prosocial behaviors while simultaneously enhancing brand loyalty? Computers in Human Behavior 154 (2024), Article 108132, 14 pages.
[94]
Xuexin Xu, Jinhui Li, Tan Phat Pham, Charles T. Salmon, and Yin-Leng Theng. 2016. Improving psychosocial well-being of older adults through exergaming: The moderation effects of intergenerational communication and age cohorts. Games for Health Journal 5, 6 (Dec. 2016), 389–397.
[95]
Sarita Yardi and Amy Bruckman. 2012. Income, race, and class: Exploring socioeconomic differences in family technology use. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI’12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 3041–3050.
[96]
Nick Yee. 2017. The primary motivations of board gamers: 7 takeaways. Retrieved October 1, 2024 from https://quanticfoundry.com/2017/04/27/board-gaming-motivations/
[97]
Ye Yuan, Jan Cao, Ruotong Wang, and Svetlana Yarosh. 2021. Tabletop games in the age of remote collaboration: Design opportunities for a socially connected game experience. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI’21). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 436, 14 pages.
[98]
José Pablo Zagal, Staffan Björk, and Chris Lewis. 2013. Dark patterns in the design of games. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on the Foundations of Digital Games(FDG’13). 39–46. http://www.fdg2013.org/program/papers.html
[99]
José Pablo Zagal, Miguel Nussbaum, and Ricardo Rosas. 2000. A model to support the design of multiplayer games. Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments 9, 5 (Oct. 2000), 448–462.
[100]
David Zendle, Paul Cairns, Herbie Barnett, and Cade McCall. 2020. Paying for loot boxes is linked to problem gambling, regardless of specific features like cash-out and pay-to-win. Computers in Human Behavior 102 (Jan. 2020), 181–191.
[101]
Yongxin Zhang, Charlotte Mejlvang Guldbæk, Christian Fog Dalsgaard Jensen, Nicolai Brodersen Hansen, and Florian Echtler. 2024. TableCanvas: Remote open-ended play in physical-digital environments. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction(TEI’24). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 74, 7 pages.
Index Terms
- Rolling in Fun, Paying the Price: A Thematic Analysis on Purchase and Play in Tabletop Games
Recommendations
CSSII: A Player Motivation Model for Tabletop Games
FDG '23: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on the Foundations of Digital GamesAlthough multiple models have been proposed to explain what motivates different players to engage with digital games, the domain of tabletop games have not received the same attention from the research community. This work tries to fill that gap, ...
Following the Leader in Multiplayer Tabletop Games
FDG '23: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on the Foundations of Digital GamesIn a two-player zero-sum game, players classically want to maximise their chance of winning. When a game has more than two players, using the binary win rate as an objective is no longer such an obvious choice. A player might instead have the objective ...
Facilitated Tabletop Games in a Mediated Environment
Gaming, Simulation and Innovations: Challenges and OpportunitiesAbstractTabletop games that require the aid of a human facilitator are typically designed for a physical environment. However, during the COVID-19 pandemic, lockdown measures prevented people from gathering. Therefore, tabletop games were sometimes played ...
Comments
Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery
New York, NY, United States
Publication History
Published: 12 December 2024
Online AM: 17 October 2024
Accepted: 19 September 2024
Revised: 15 July 2024
Received: 11 October 2022
Published in GAMES Volume 3, Issue 1
Check for updates
Author Tags
Qualifiers
- Research-article
Funding Sources
- NSERC CREATE SWaGUR
- Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council
- Lennart Nacke’s NSERC Discovery
- Canada Foundation for Innovation John R. Evans Leaders Fund “The Seamless User-Centered Conscious Experience Study System (SUCCESS)
- Impact of Cultural and Economic Factors on Play and Purchase Decisions for Tabletop Games
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- 0Total Citations
- 322Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)322
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)127
Reflects downloads up to 25 Feb 2025
Other Metrics
Citations
View Options
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Sign in