Modelling Visual Attention for Future Intelligent Flight Deck - A Case Study of Pilot Eye Tracking in Simulated Flight Takeoff
Pages 170 - 175
Abstract
Piloting is a cognitively demanding task that not only requires conceptual knowledge and domain expertise, but also skills to intercept relevant visual cues in a changing environment. Pilots’ abilities to divide their visual attention effectively during critical flight maneuvers play a central role in their situation awareness and decision-making. Given that a large number of visual cues in the flight deck need to be processed by the human eyes, there is an opportunity to utilize eye tracking in the analytics of pilot performance. To this end, we present a case study involving 10 licensed pilots in a simulated flight takeoff scenario and demonstrate that specific gaze behaviors employed by a pilot may lead to varying levels of success. In particular, pilots who perform better during the climb phase may often exhibit faster visual searches, and those who perform better during the takeoff phase may often scan a larger area of the visual scene. Also, more successful pilots tend to report lower cognitive workload that is further supported by their pupil diameters in the experiment. This knowledge may be utilized in the development of user models to infer pilot success and failure, whereby an intelligent flight deck can adapt system behaviors to the pilot, whereby alerts, warnings, and automation may be initiated in the event of detecting irregularity in pilots’ gaze.
References
[1]
Boeing. Statistical Summary of Commercial Jet Airplane Accidents Worldwide Operations. 2015. Aviation Safety, Boeing Commercial Airplanes: Seattle, WA, USA, 1959–2014.
[2]
John D. Lee, Bobbie D. Seppelt. 2006. Human factors and ergonomics in automation design. In Handbook of Human Factors and Ergonomics, 3rd ed.; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA; 1570–1596.
[3]
Scott Shappell, Cristy Detwiler, Kali Holcomb, Carla Hackworth, Albert Boquet, Douglas Wiegmann. 2006. Human Error and Commercial Aviation Accidents: A Comprehensive, Fine-Grained Analysis Using HFACS, retrieved from https://commons.erau.edu/publication/1218
[4]
Thibault Gateau, Caroline P. Carvalho Chanel, Mai-Huy Le, Frédéric Dehais. 2016. Considering human's non-deterministic behavior and his availability state when designing a collaborative human-robots system. IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, 4391–4397.
[5]
National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB). 1994. A Review of Flightcrew-Involved, Major Accidents of U. S. Carriers, 1978 through 1990, Safety Study NTSB/SS-94/01; NTSB: Washington, DC, USA.
[6]
Flight Safety Foundation, The Active Pilot Monitoring Working Group, A Practical Guide for Improving Flight Path Monitoring (November 2014)
[7]
Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). 14 CFR Part 121 Qualification, Service, and Use of Crewmembers and Aircraft Dispatchers; Final Rule; Federal Register: Washington, DC, USA, 2013; Volume 78, Issue 218.
[8]
British European Airways (BEA). Study on Aeroplane State Awareness during Go-Around. 2013.
[9]
Olivier Lefrançois, Nadine Matton, GourinatYves, Vsevolod Peysakhovich, Mickaël Causse. 2016. The role of Pilots’ monitoring strategies in flight performance. In Proceedings of the 32nd EAAP Conference (European Association for Aviation Psychology), Cascais, Portugal, 26–30.
[10]
Sylvia Peißl, Christopher D. Wickens, and Rithi Baruah. 2018. Eye-Tracking Measures in Aviation: A Selective Literature Review, The International Journal of Aerospace Psychology, 28:3-4, 98–112.
[11]
Daniel Martinez-Marquez, Sravan Pingali, Kriengsak Panuwatwanich, Rodney A. Stewart, and Sherif Mohamed, Application of Eye Tracking Technology in Aviation, Maritime, and Construction Industries: A Systematic Review. Sensors 2021, 21, 4289.
[12]
Lyu Mengtao, Li Fan, Xu Gangyan, Han Su, Leveraging eye-tracking technologies to promote aviation safety- A review of key aspects, challenges, and future perspectives, Safety Science, Volume 168, 2023, 106295, ISSN 0925–7535.
[13]
Leandro L. Di Stasi and Carolina Diaz-Piedra. 2019. Eye Movements Research in Aviation: Past, Present, and Future, CRC Press, Inc., London, UK, 1st edition, 143–162. ISBN 9780429960147.
[14]
Gal Ziv. 2016. Gaze Behavior and visual attention: A review of eye tracking studies in aviation, The International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 26(3–4), 75–104.
[15]
Nadine B. Sarter, and David D. Woods. 1994. Pilot interaction with flight deck automation II: An experimental study of pilots' model and awareness of the flight management system. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 4, 1–28.
[16]
Vsevolod Peysakhovich, Frédéric Dehais, Mickaël Causse. 2015. Pupil diameter as a measure of cognitive load during auditory-visual interference in a simple piloting task. Procedia Manufacturing 3, 5199–5205.
[17]
Olivier Lefrancois, Nadine Matton, Gourinat Yves, Vsevolod Peysakhovich, Mickaël Causse. 2016. The role of Pilots' monitoring strategies in flight performance. EAAP32, European Association for Aviation Psychology Conference, Cascais, Portugal.
[18]
Frédéric Dehais, Julia Behrend, Vsevolod Peysakhovich, Mickaël Causse, Christopher D. Wickens. 2017. Pilot Flying and Pilot Monitoring's Aircraft State Awareness During Go-Around Execution in Aviation: A Behavioral and Eye Tracking Study. The International Journal of Aerospace Psychology, vol. 27 (n° 1-2), 15–28.
[19]
Vsevolod Peysakhovich, Olivier Lefrançois, Frédéric Dehais and Mickaël Causse. 2018. The Neuroergonomics of Aircraft Flight decks: The Four Stages of Eye-Tracking Integration to Enhance Flight Safety, Safety 4 (2018): 8.
[20]
David Rudi, Peter Kiefer, and Martin Raubal. 2018. Visualizing Pilot Eye Movements for Flight Instructors. In ETVIS’18: 3rd Workshop on Eye Tracking and Visualization, June 14–17, 2018, Warsaw, Poland. ACM, New York, NY, USA.
[21]
Vsevolod Peysakhovich, Wietse D. Ledegang, Mark M.J. Houben, and Eric L. Groen. 2022. Classification of flight phases based on pilots’ visual scanning strategies. In 2022 Symposium on Eye Tracking Research and Applications (ETRA ’22), June 8–11, 2022, Seattle, WA, USA. ACM, New York, NY, USA.
[22]
Christophe Lounis, Vsevolod Peysakhovich, Mickaël Causse. 2021. Visual scanning strategies in the flight deck are modulated by pilots’ expertise: A flight simulator study. PLoS ONE 16(2): e0247061.
[23]
Eve Fabre, Patrick Braca, Vsevolod Peysakhovich, and Frédéric Dehais. 2022. A New Interface to Cope With Unreliable Airspeed Indications: A Behavioral and Eye-Tracking Study. Aviation Psychology and Applied Human Factors. 12. 211–30.
[24]
Sandra G. Hart, Lowell E. Staveland. 1988. Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of Empirical and Theoretical Research. Human Mental Workload. Amsterdam: North Holland Press.
[25]
Grant T. Liu, Nicholas J. Volpe, and Steven L. Galetta. 2018. Neuro-Ophthalmology Diagnosis and Management, 3rd Edition, ISBN: 9780323340441, Elsevier, Chapter 13, p. 429.
[26]
Spector RH. The Pupils. In: Walker HK, Hall WD, Hurst JW, editors. Clinical Methods: The History, Physical, and Laboratory Examinations. 3rd edition. Boston: Butterworths; 1990. Chapter 58.
[27]
Joseph H. Goldberg and Xerxes P Kotval, Computer interface evaluation using eye movements: methods and constructs, International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 1999, 24(6), 6311–645.
[28]
Bo Fu, Peter Gatsby, Angelo Ryan Soriano, Kayla Chu, and Nicolas Guardado Guardado, Towards Intelligent Flight Deck – A Case Study of Applied Eye Tracking in The Predictions of Pilot Success and Failure During Simulated Flight Takeoff, In: Alan Dix, Matt Roach, Tommaso Turchi, Alessio Malizia, and Ben Wilson (Eds) Proceedings of the International Workshop on Designing and Building Hybrid Human–AI Systems (SYNERGY 2024), co-located with the 17th International Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces (AVI 2024) .
[29]
Ben Steichen. 2024. Computational Methods to Infer Human Factors for Adaptation and Personalization Using Eye Tracking. In: Ferwerda, B., Graus, M., Germanakos, P., Tkalčič, M. (eds) A Human-Centered Perspective of Intelligent Personalized Environments and Systems, pp. 183–204, Human–Computer Interaction Series. Springer, Cham.
Recommendations
The evaluation of military pilot's attention distributions on the flight deck
HCI-Aero '16: Proceedings of the International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction in AerospaceA total of 35 pilots participated in the current research by performing an air-to-surface task using an eye-tracker and F-16 flight simulator. All participants were qualified military pilots with mission-ready qualifications in tactical operations. The ...
Comments
Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
June 2024
662 pages
ISBN:9798400704666
DOI:10.1145/3631700
- General Chairs:
- Ludovico Boratto,
- Cristina Gena,
- Mirko Marras,
- Program Chairs:
- Panagiotis Germanakos,
- Elvira Popescus
Copyright © 2024 Owner/Author.
Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.
Sponsors
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery
New York, NY, United States
Publication History
Published: 28 June 2024
Check for updates
Author Tags
Qualifiers
- Extended-abstract
- Research
- Refereed limited
Conference
UMAP '24: 32nd ACM Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization
July 1 - 4, 2024
Cagliari, Italy
Acceptance Rates
Overall Acceptance Rate 162 of 633 submissions, 26%
Upcoming Conference
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- 0Total Citations
- 51Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)51
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)3
Reflects downloads up to 21 Nov 2024
Other Metrics
Citations
View Options
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Sign inFull Access
View options
View or Download as a PDF file.
PDFeReader
View online with eReader.
eReaderHTML Format
View this article in HTML Format.
HTML Format