Advantage of Gaze-Only Content Browsing in VR using Cumulative Dwell Time Compared to Hand Controller
Article No.: 1, Pages 1 - 8
Abstract
Head-mounted displays(HMDs) are expected to be used as daily devices. Developing interfaces to control contents projected in a head-mounted display (HMD) is key to leading the spread of HMD usage. With the need for a new interface of the HMD, gaze interface has been researched. One of the main challenges has been detecting the user’s control intention from gaze movements. Considering short periods of gaze movement away, cumulative gaze dwell time is considered suitable for predicting operations from natural gaze movements while browsing contents. In this study, we evaluated a gaze-only contents browsing method using cumulative dwell time by comparing the hand controller method. The results showed that the proposed gaze method can achieve the same level of time and usability with less physical workload than the controller method. It was also found that more people prefer the proposed gaze-based method (16 in total; gaze: 3, rather gaze: 6, neutral: 1, rather controllers: 6). These results indicate the applicability of implicit interaction by gaze for browsing contents on HMDs.
References
[1]
Inc. Apple. 2023. Apple Vision Pro.https://www.apple.com/apple-vision-pro/.
[2]
Aaron Bangor, Philip T Kortum, and James T Miller. 2008. An empirical evaluation of the system usability scale. Intl. Journal of Human–Computer Interaction 24, 6 (2008), 574–594.
[3]
Jonas Blattgerste, Patrick Renner, and Thies Pfeiffer. 2018. Advantages of Eye-Gaze over Head-Gaze-Based Selection in Virtual and Augmented Reality under Varying Field of Views. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Communication by Gaze Interaction (Warsaw, Poland) (COGAIN ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 1, 9 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3206343.3206349
[4]
Xiuli Chen, Aditya Acharya, Antti Oulasvirta, and Andrew Howes. 2021. An Adaptive Model of Gaze-Based Selection. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Yokohama, Japan) (CHI ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 288, 11 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445177
[5]
Tan Gemicioglu, R. Michael Winters, Yu-Te Wang, Thomas M. Gable, Ann Paradiso, and Ivan J. Tashev. 2023. Gaze & Tongue: A Subtle, Hands-Free Interaction for Head-Worn Devices. In Extended Abstracts of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Hamburg, Germany) (CHI EA ’23). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 456, 4 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3544549.3583930
[6]
John Paulin Hansen, Vijay Rajanna, I. Scott MacKenzie, and Per Bækgaard. 2018. A Fitts’ Law Study of Click and Dwell Interaction by Gaze, Head and Mouse with a Head-Mounted Display. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Communication by Gaze Interaction (Warsaw, Poland) (COGAIN ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 7, 5 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3206343.3206344
[7]
Sandra G Hart and Lowell E Staveland. 1988. Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of empirical and theoretical research. In Advances in psychology. Vol. 52. Elsevier, 139–183.
[8]
Juan David Hincapié-Ramos, Xiang Guo, Paymahn Moghadasian, and Pourang Irani. 2014. Consumed Endurance: A Metric to Quantify Arm Fatigue of Mid-Air Interactions. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Toronto, Ontario, Canada) (CHI ’14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1063–1072. https://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557130
[9]
Shota Imamura, Jieun Lee, and Makoto Itoh. 2023. Control Prediction Based on Cumulative Gaze Dwell Time While Browsing Contents. In Proceedings of the 2023 Symposium on Eye Tracking Research and Applications (Tubingen, Germany) (ETRA ’23). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 91, 6 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3588015.3589664
[10]
Yoshio Ishiguro and Jun Rekimoto. 2011. Peripheral Vision Annotation: Noninterference Information Presentation Method for Mobile Augmented Reality. In Proceedings of the 2nd Augmented Human International Conference (Tokyo, Japan) (AH ’11). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 8, 5 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/1959826.1959834
[11]
Toshiya Isomoto, Toshiyuki Ando, Buntarou Shizuki, and Shin Takahashi. 2018. Dwell Time Reduction Technique Using Fitts’ Law for Gaze-Based Target Acquisition. In Proceedings of the 2018 ACM Symposium on Eye Tracking Research & Applications (Warsaw, Poland) (ETRA ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 26, 7 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3204493.3204532
[12]
Toshiya Isomoto, Shota Yamanaka, and Buntarou Shizuki. 2023. Exploring Dwell-Time from Human Cognitive Processes for Dwell Selection. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 7, ETRA, Article 159 (may 2023), 15 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3591128
[13]
Robert J. K. Jacob. 1990. What You Look at is What You Get: Eye Movement-Based Interaction Techniques. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Seattle, Washington, USA) (CHI ’90). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 11–18. https://doi.org/10.1145/97243.97246
[14]
Sujin Jang, Wolfgang Stuerzlinger, Satyajit Ambike, and Karthik Ramani. 2017. Modeling Cumulative Arm Fatigue in Mid-Air Interaction Based on Perceived Exertion and Kinetics of Arm Motion. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Denver, Colorado, USA) (CHI ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 3328–3339. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025523
[15]
Wen jun Hou and Xiao lin Chen. 2021. Comparison of Eye-Based and Controller-Based Selection in Virtual Reality. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction 37, 5 (2021), 484–495. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2020.1826190 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2020.1826190
[16]
Youngho Kim, Ahmed Hassan, Ryen W. White, and Imed Zitouni. 2014. Modeling Dwell Time to Predict Click-Level Satisfaction. In Proceedings of the 7th ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining (New York, New York, USA) (WSDM ’14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 193–202. https://doi.org/10.1145/2556195.2556220
[17]
Manu Kumar and Terry Winograd. 2007. Gaze-Enhanced Scrolling Techniques. In Proceedings of the 20th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (Newport, Rhode Island, USA) (UIST ’07). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 213–216. https://doi.org/10.1145/1294211.1294249
[18]
Francisco Lopez Luro and Veronica Sundstedt. 2019. A Comparative Study of Eye Tracking and Hand Controller for Aiming Tasks in Virtual Reality. In Proceedings of the 11th ACM Symposium on Eye Tracking Research & Applications (Denver, Colorado) (ETRA ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 68, 9 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3317956.3318153
[19]
Inc. Meta Platforms. 2022. Meta Quest Pro product overview page.https://www.meta.com/jp/quest/quest-pro/.
[20]
Aanand Nayyar, Utkarsh Dwivedi, Karan Ahuja, Nitendra Rajput, Seema Nagar, and Kuntal Dey. 2017. OptiDwell: Intelligent Adjustment of Dwell Click Time. In Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (Limassol, Cyprus) (IUI ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 193–204. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025171.3025202
[21]
Japan Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications.2022. 2022 Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications Information and Communication White Paper, Data Collection (Chapter 3 related data) 18. Global AR/VR market size, shipment trends and forecasts.https://www.soumu.go.jp/johotsusintokei/whitepaper/ja/r04/html/nf3r1000.html#d03r1180.
[22]
Abdul Moiz Penkar, Christof Lutteroth, and Gerald Weber. 2012. Designing for the Eye: Design Parameters for Dwell in Gaze Interaction. In Proceedings of the 24th Australian Computer-Human Interaction Conference (Melbourne, Australia) (OzCHI ’12). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 479–488. https://doi.org/10.1145/2414536.2414609
[23]
Ken Pfeuffer, Yasmeen Abdrabou, Augusto Esteves, Radiah Rivu, Yomna Abdelrahman, Stefanie Meitner, Amr Saadi, and Florian Alt. 2021. ARtention: A design space for gaze-adaptive user interfaces in augmented reality. Computers & Graphics 95 (2021), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cag.2021.01.001
[24]
Ken Pfeuffer, Benedikt Mayer, Diako Mardanbegi, and Hans Gellersen. 2017. Gaze + Pinch Interaction in Virtual Reality. In Proceedings of the 5th Symposium on Spatial User Interaction (Brighton, United Kingdom) (SUI ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 99–108. https://doi.org/10.1145/3131277.3132180
[25]
Ken Pfeuffer, Lukas Mecke, Sarah Delgado Rodriguez, Mariam Hassib, Hannah Maier, and Florian Alt. 2020. Empirical Evaluation of Gaze-Enhanced Menus in Virtual Reality. In Proceedings of the 26th ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology (Virtual Event, Canada) (VRST ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 20, 11 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3385956.3418962
[26]
Ivan Poupyrev, Tadao Ichikawa, Suzanne Weghorst, and Mark Billinghurst. 1998. Egocentric object manipulation in virtual environments: empirical evaluation of interaction techniques. In Computer graphics forum, Vol. 17. Wiley Online Library, 41–52.
[27]
Yuan Yuan Qian and Robert J. Teather. 2017. The Eyes Don’t Have It: An Empirical Comparison of Head-Based and Eye-Based Selection in Virtual Reality. In Proceedings of the 5th Symposium on Spatial User Interaction (Brighton, United Kingdom) (SUI ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 91–98. https://doi.org/10.1145/3131277.3132182
[28]
Dominik Schön, Thomas Kosch, Florian Müller, Martin Schmitz, Sebastian Günther, Lukas Bommhardt, and Max Mühlhäuser. 2023. Tailor Twist: Assessing Rotational Mid-Air Interactions for Augmented Reality. In Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Hamburg, Germany) (CHI ’23). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 400, 14 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3544548.3581461
[29]
Selina Sharmin, Oleg Špakov, and Kari-Jouko Räihä. 2013. Reading On-Screen Text with Gaze-Based Auto-Scrolling. In Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Eye Tracking South Africa (Cape Town, South Africa) (ETSA ’13). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 24–31. https://doi.org/10.1145/2509315.2509319
[30]
Rongkai Shi, Yushi Wei, Xueying Qin, Pan Hui, and Hai-Ning Liang. 2023. Exploring Gaze-Assisted and Hand-Based Region Selection in Augmented Reality. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 7, ETRA, Article 160 (may 2023), 19 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3591129
[31]
Ludwig Sidenmark and Hans Gellersen. 2019. Eye, Head and Torso Coordination During Gaze Shifts in Virtual Reality. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 27, 1, Article 4 (dec 2019), 40 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3361218
[32]
Zixiong Su, Xinlei Zhang, Naoki Kimura, and Jun Rekimoto. 2021. Gaze+Lip: Rapid, Precise and Expressive Interactions Combining Gaze Input and Silent Speech Commands for Hands-Free Smart TV Control. In ACM Symposium on Eye Tracking Research and Applications (Virtual Event, Germany) (ETRA ’21 Short Papers). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 13, 6 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3448018.3458011
[33]
Jayson Turner, Shamsi Iqbal, and Susan Dumais. 2015. Understanding Gaze and Scrolling Strategies in Text Consumption Tasks. In Adjunct Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing and Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers (Osaka, Japan) (UbiComp/ISWC’15 Adjunct). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 829–838. https://doi.org/10.1145/2800835.2804331
[34]
Uta Wagner, Mathias N. Lystbæk, Pavel Manakhov, Jens Emil Sloth Grønbæk, Ken Pfeuffer, and Hans Gellersen. 2023. A Fitts’ Law Study of Gaze-Hand Alignment for Selection in 3D User Interfaces. In Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Hamburg, Germany) (CHI ’23). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 252, 15 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3544548.3581423
[35]
Xin Yi, Yiqin Lu, Ziyin Cai, Zihan Wu, Yuntao Wang, and Yuanchun Shi. 2022. GazeDock: Gaze-Only Menu Selection in Virtual Reality using Auto-Triggering Peripheral Menu. In 2022 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR). 832–842. https://doi.org/10.1109/VR51125.2022.00105
[36]
Yanxia Zhang, Andreas Bulling, and Hans Gellersen. 2013. SideWays: A Gaze Interface for Spontaneous Interaction with Situated Displays. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Paris, France) (CHI ’13). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 851–860. https://doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2470775
Index Terms
- Advantage of Gaze-Only Content Browsing in VR using Cumulative Dwell Time Compared to Hand Controller
Recommendations
Control prediction based on cumulative gaze dwell time while browsing contents
ETRA '23: Proceedings of the 2023 Symposium on Eye Tracking Research and ApplicationsThe utilization of gaze behavior for control has been studied as one of the hands-free control methods. With the recent spread of Head Mounted Display devices, it has become a vital issue to establish hands-free control methods. Previously proposed ...
Gaze-Hand Alignment: Combining Eye Gaze and Mid-Air Pointing for Interacting with Menus in Augmented Reality
ETRAGaze and freehand gestures suit Augmented Reality as users can interact with objects at a distance without need for a separate input device. We propose Gaze-Hand Alignment as a novel multimodal selection principle, defined by concurrent use of both gaze ...
Snap, Pursuit and Gain: Virtual Reality Viewport Control by Gaze
CHI '24: Proceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsHead-mounted displays let users explore virtual environments through a viewport that is coupled with head movement. In this work, we investigate gaze as an alternative modality for viewport control, enabling exploration of virtual worlds with less head ...
Comments
Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
October 2023
505 pages
ISBN:9798400702815
DOI:10.1145/3607822
Copyright © 2023 ACM.
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].
Sponsors
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery
New York, NY, United States
Publication History
Published: 13 October 2023
Check for updates
Author Tags
Qualifiers
- Research-article
- Research
- Refereed limited
Funding Sources
- JSPS KAKENHI
- JST Moon- shot R&D
- NICT Japan
Conference
Acceptance Rates
Overall Acceptance Rate 86 of 279 submissions, 31%
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- 0Total Citations
- 175Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)124
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)3
Reflects downloads up to 29 Nov 2024
Other Metrics
Citations
View Options
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Sign inFull Access
View options
View or Download as a PDF file.
PDFeReader
View online with eReader.
eReaderHTML Format
View this article in HTML Format.
HTML Format