Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/3568834.3568903acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicibeConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

How is Technology Accepted? Fundamental Works in User Technology Acceptance from Diffusion of Innovations to UTAUT-2

Published: 25 January 2023 Publication History

Abstract

The decision to accept and use technology innovations has long been a source of debate across disciplines due to the complexity involved in predicting behavior. Recognizing that the subject is vast and fragmented, this paper examines the mainstream technology works to assist researchers to understand, conceptualize and select the most appropriate theoretical framework for their study. Starting with the pioneering effort on Diffusion of Innovations (DOI/IDT), the analysis considers the Theory of Reasoned Action (TRA), the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB), the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM/TAM-2/TAM-3), the Value-based Acceptance Model (VAM), and the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT/UTAUT-2) among the most important. A review of the key literature is vital to assessing and identifying research trends, as well as contributing to the discussion of emerging technologies such as Artificial Intelligence (AI), Augmented Reality (AR), Blockchain, Cloud Computing, Internet of Things (IoT), Mobile Apps, etc. Suggestions for future research paths are also provided.

References

[1]
I. Ajzen, "The Theory of Planned Behavior," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Process, no. 50, pp. 179-211, 1991.
[2]
E. M. Rogers, Diffusion of Innovations, New York: Free Press, 2003.
[3]
J. Tidd, Ed., Gaining Momentum, vol. 15, World Scientific Publishing Company, 2010.
[4]
H.-W. Kim, A. Kankanhalli and H.-L. Lee, "Investigating decision factors in mobile application purchase: A mixed-methods approach," Information & Management, vol. 53, no. 6, pp. 727-739, 2016.
[5]
D. Pati and L. N. Lorusso, "How to Write a SystematicReview of the Literature," Health Environments Research& Design Journal, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 15-30, 2018.
[6]
G. C. Moore and I. Benbasat, "Development of an Instrument to Measure the Perceptions of Adopting an Information Technology Innovation," Information Systems Research, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 192-222, 1991.
[7]
E. C.-F. Shih and A. Venkatesh, "Beyond Adoption: Development and Application of a Use-Diffusion Model," Journal of Marketing, vol. 68, pp. 59-72, 2004.
[8]
F. M. Bass, "A New Product Growth For Model Consumer Durables," Management Science, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 215-227, 1969.
[9]
A. Parasuraman and C. L. Colby, "An Updated and Streamlined Technology Readiness Index: TRI 2.0," Journal of Service Research, vol. 15, no. 8, pp. 59-74, 2014.
[10]
R. Sharma and R. Mishra, "A Review of Evolution of Theories and Models of Technology Adoption," Indore Management Journal, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 17-19, 2014.
[11]
L. Van Hove, "Metcalfe's Law: Not so Wrong after All," Netnomics, vol. 15, no. 1, 2014.
[12]
M. Fishbein and M. Ajzen, Predicting and Changing Behavior: The Reasoned Action Approach, Taylor & Francis, 2011.
[13]
M. Fishbein and I. Ajzen, Belief, attitude, intention and behaviour: An introduction to theory and research, Reading, Mass: Addison-Wesley Pub. Co, 1975.
[14]
A. M. Momani and M. M. Jamous, "The Evolution of Technology Acceptance Theories," International Journal of Contemporary Computer Research, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 51-58, 2017.
[15]
F. Davis, "Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology," MIS Quarterly, vol. 13, pp. 319-340, 1989.
[16]
S. Taylor and P. A. Todd, "Understanding Information Technology Usage: A Test of Competing Models," Information Systems Research, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 144-176, 1995.
[17]
V. Venkatesh and F. D. Davis, "A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies," Management Science, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 186-204, 2000.
[18]
V. Venkatesh and H. Bala, "Technology Acceptance Model 3 and a Research Agenda on Interventions," Decision Sciences, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 273-315, 2008.
[19]
S. Kulviwat, G. C. Bruner II, A. Kumar, S. A. Nasco and T. Clark, "Toward a Unified Theory of Consumer Acceptance Technology," Psychology & Marketing, vol. 24, no. 2, p. 1059–1084, 2007.
[20]
A. Mehrabian, "Pleasure-arousal-dominance: A general framework for describing and measuring individual differences in temperament," Current Psychology, vol. 14, p. 261–292., 1996.
[21]
N. Zhang, X. Guo and G. Chen, "IDT-TAM Integrated Model for IT Adoption," Tsinghua Science and Technology, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 306-311, 2008.
[22]
Y. Kim, Y. Park and J. Choi, "A study on the adoption of IoT smart home service: using Value-based Adoption Model," Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, pp. 1-17, 2007.
[23]
A. Bandura, W. H. Freeman and R. Lightsey, "Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control," Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 158-166, 1999.
[24]
G. Zhu, S. Sangwan and T. Lu, "A new theoretical framework of technology acceptance and empirical investigation on self‐efficacy‐based value adoption model," Nankai Business Review International, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 345-372.
[25]
V. Venkatesh, M. G. Morris, G. B. Davis and F. D. Davis, "User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View," MIS Quarterly, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 425-478, 2003.
[26]
V. Venkatesh, J. Y. L. Thong and X. Xu, "Consumer Acceptance and Use of Information Technology: Extending the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology," MIS Quarterly, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 157-178, 2012.
[27]
F. M. Shoaib, S. Maimoona, J. Norizan, F. Alain, A. Kartinah, R.-M. Mirjana and S. Ali, "Acceptance and Use of Lecture Capture System (LCS) in Executive Business Studies: Extending UTAUT2," Interactive Technology and Smart Education, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 329-348, 2017.
[28]
S. M. Shuhidan, "Extending Technology Acceptance Model to EPV Application," International Journal of Financial Research, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 398-410, 2019.
[29]
G. D. Garson, Partial least squares: Regression and structural equation models, Asheboro, NC: Statistical Associates Publishing, 2016.
[30]
S. Rolstad, Adler, J. and Ryden, A., "Response Burden and Questionnaire Length: Is Shorter Better? A Review and Meta-analysis," Value in Health, pp. 1101-1108, 2011.
[31]
M. S. Hagger, "The reasoned action approach and the theories of reasoned action and planned behavior.," in Oxford Bibliographies in Psychology, New York, Oxford University Press, 2019.
[32]
H. Taherdoost, "A review of technology acceptance and adoption models and theories," in 11th International Conference Interdisciplinary in Engineering, TIrgu-Mures, Romania, 2017.
[33]
W. Eggink and J. Snippert, "Future Aesthetics of Technology; context specific theories from design and philosophy of technology," The Design Journal, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 196-208, 2017.

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)Acceptance of Insects as Food: An Exploratory Study of Young Consumers in MacauIndian Journal of Entomology10.55446/IJE.2023.1082(1-7)Online publication date: 14-Aug-2023
  • (2023)Environmental Concern and the Intention to Use Eco-friendly Technologies: An Analysis of Battery Electric Vehicles in Macau.Proceedings of the 2023 14th International Conference on E-business, Management and Economics10.1145/3616712.3616761(446-452)Online publication date: 21-Jul-2023
  • (2023)Exploring Students’ Adoption of Virtual Reality in Journalism Practice Education: An UTAUT PerspectiveCritical Reflections on ICT and Education10.1007/978-981-99-7559-4_3(37-57)Online publication date: 14-Dec-2023

Index Terms

  1. How is Technology Accepted? Fundamental Works in User Technology Acceptance from Diffusion of Innovations to UTAUT-2

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    ICIBE '22: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Industrial and Business Engineering
    September 2022
    552 pages
    ISBN:9781450397582
    DOI:10.1145/3568834
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 25 January 2023

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. Acceptance and Use of Technology
    2. Product Innovation
    3. Technology Acceptance
    4. Technology Adoption
    5. Technology Innovation

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Conference

    ICIBE 2022

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)171
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)18
    Reflects downloads up to 09 Feb 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2023)Acceptance of Insects as Food: An Exploratory Study of Young Consumers in MacauIndian Journal of Entomology10.55446/IJE.2023.1082(1-7)Online publication date: 14-Aug-2023
    • (2023)Environmental Concern and the Intention to Use Eco-friendly Technologies: An Analysis of Battery Electric Vehicles in Macau.Proceedings of the 2023 14th International Conference on E-business, Management and Economics10.1145/3616712.3616761(446-452)Online publication date: 21-Jul-2023
    • (2023)Exploring Students’ Adoption of Virtual Reality in Journalism Practice Education: An UTAUT PerspectiveCritical Reflections on ICT and Education10.1007/978-981-99-7559-4_3(37-57)Online publication date: 14-Dec-2023

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format.

    HTML Format

    Figures

    Tables

    Media

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media