research-article

Open access

Commensality or Reverie in Eating? Exploring the Solo Dining Experience

Authors:

Mimi Bocanegra,

Roelof A.J. de Vries,

Geke D.S. LuddenAuthors Info & Claims

ICMI '22: Proceedings of the 2022 International Conference on Multimodal Interaction

Pages 25 - 35

https://doi.org/10.1145/3536221.3556577

Published: 07 November 2022 Publication History

All formats PDF

Abstract

Commensality, the act of eating together, is commonly associated with many benefits. Dining solo, in contrast, is frequently connected to adverse effects on a person. There is a growing interest in human-computer interaction (HCI) and design in how innovations can enhance eating experiences by, for example, facilitating commensality. The steadily growing number of people eating alone and the associated risks beg the question of how HCI and design could contribute to and improve the solo dining experience and whether or not mimicking or facilitating commensality is what solo diners want. This two-phased study reports on the context exploration of the multimodal solitary dining experience. In the first phase, we scoped the literature describing the benefits and drawbacks of solo dining and commensality. For the second phase, a digital food diary was developed and completed by six solo diners to collect further insights and user requirements. Photos and annotations collected as part of the food diary were analyzed using content analysis. The results indicate several advantages of eating alone, including feeling relaxed, perceiving solo dining as a moment of self-pampering, and appreciating the cooking experience. Overall, it seems that solo dining is not merely a lack of commensality, but a unique experience in and of itself, where people seem to strive towards finding reverie in eating.

References

[1]

Jane Agee. 2009. Developing qualitative research questions: A reflective process. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education 22, 4(2009), 431–447.

[2]

Ferran Altarriba Bertran, Samvid Jhaveri, Rosa Lutz, Katherine Isbister, and Danielle Wilde. 2019. Making sense of human-food interaction. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–13.

Digital Library

[3]

Kathy Baxter, Catherine Courage, and Kelly Caine. 2015. Chapter 8 - Diary Studies. In Understanding your Users (Second Edition) (second edition ed.), Kathy Baxter, Catherine Courage, and Kelly Caine (Eds.). Morgan Kaufmann, Boston, 192–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-800232-2.00008-0

[4]

Fidelma Breen, John Coveney, and Carol Anne Hartwick Pflaum. 2018. A literature scoping review of eating practices and food environments in 1 and 2-person households in the UK, Australia and USA. Appetite 126(2018), 43–53.

[5]

Lorraine Brown, Dimitrios Buhalis, and Sean Beer. 2020. Dining alone: Improving the experience of solo restaurant goers. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management 32, 3(2020), 1347–1365.

[6]

Lorraine Brown, John Edwards, and Heather Hartwell. 2013. Eating and emotion: focusing on the lunchtime meal. British Food Journal 115, 2 (2013), 196–208.

[7]

Lara Carminati. 2018. Generalizability in qualitative research: A tale of two traditions. Qualitative Health Research 28, 13 (2018), 2094–2101.

[8]

Wookyoun Cho, Wakako Takeda, Yujin Oh, Naomi Aiba, and Youngmee Lee. 2015. Perceptions and practices of commensality and solo-eating among Korean and Japanese university students: A cross-cultural analysis. Nutrition Research and Practice 9, 5 (2015), 523–529.

[9]

Roger Clark. 2007. Convenience Sample. The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology(2007), 1–2.

[10]

Amélie Clauzel, Nathalie Guichard, and Caroline Riché. 2019. Dining alone or together? The effect of group size on the service customer experience. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services 47 (2019), 222–228.

[11]

Vanessa I Clendenen, C Peter Herman, and Janet Polivy. 1994. Social facilitation of eating among friends and strangers. Appetite 23, 1 (1994), 1–13.

[12]

Carole Counihan. 2018. Commensality and taste. International Journal of Food Design 3, 2 (2018), 143–146.

[13]

Giada Danesi. 2012. Commensality in French and German young adults: An ethnographic study. Hospitality & Society 1, 2 (2012), 153–172.

[14]

Giada Danesi. 2012. Pleasures and stress of eating alone and eating together among French and German young adults. Menu: the Journal of Eating and Hospitality Research 1 (2012), 77–91.

[15]

Giada Danesi. 2018. A cross-cultural approach to eating together: Practices of commensality among French, German and Spanish young adults. Social Science Information 57, 1 (2018), 99–120.

[16]

Larry Dossey. 2016. Solitude: On dining alone, cellphones, and teddy bears. Explore: The Journal of Science and Healing 12, 2 (2016), 77–83.

[17]

Hasan Shahid Ferdous, Bernd Ploderer, Hilary Davis, Frank Vetere, and Kenton O’Hara. 2015. Pairing technology and meals: A contextual enquiry in the family household. In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Australian Special Interest Group for Computer Human Interaction. 370–379.

Digital Library

[18]

Hasan Shahid Ferdous, Bernd Ploderer, Hilary Davis, Frank Vetere, and Kenton O’hara. 2016. Commensality and the social use of technology during family mealtime. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI) 23, 6(2016), 1–26.

Digital Library

[19]

Hasan Shahid Ferdous, Frank Vetere, Hilary Davis, Bernd Ploderer, Kenton O’hara, Rob Comber, and Geremy Farr-Wharton. 2017. Celebratory technology to orchestrate the sharing of devices and stories during family mealtimes. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 6960–6972.

Digital Library

[20]

Claude Fischler. 2011. Commensality, society and culture. Social Science Information 50, 3-4 (2011), 528–548.

[21]

Murray J Fisher and Andrea P Marshall. 2009. Understanding descriptive statistics. Australian Critical Care 22, 2 (2009), 93–97.

[22]

Alexandra Fritzen, Frederic Andres, and Maria Leite. 2018. Introducing flavorlens: A social media platform for sharing dish observations. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Multisensory Approaches to Human-Food Interaction. 1–7.

Digital Library

[23]

Claudia Giacoman. 2016. The dimensions and role of commensality: A theoretical model drawn from the significance of communal eating among adults in Santiago, Chile. Appetite 107(2016), 460–470.

[24]

David E Gray. 2021. Doing research in the real world. Sage.

[25]

Catherine Grevet, Anthony Tang, and Elizabeth Mynatt. 2012. Eating alone, together: new forms of commensality. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM International Conference on Supporting Group Work. 103–106.

Digital Library

[26]

EunSol Her and Soobin Seo. 2018. Why not eat alone? The effect of other consumers on solo dining intentions and the mechanism. International Journal of Hospitality Management 70 (2018), 16–24.

[27]

S Hong and S Park. 2018. Internet mukbang (foodcasting) in South Korea. Young and Creative: Digital Technologies empowering Children in Everyday Life (2018), 111–125.

[28]

Hsiu-Fang Hsieh and Sarah E Shannon. 2005. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research 15, 9 (2005), 1277–1288.

[29]

YooHee Hwang, Joongwon Shin, and Anna S Mattila. 2018. So private, yet so public: The impact of spatial distance, other diners, and power on solo dining experiences. Journal of Business Research 92 (2018), 36–47.

[30]

Tomoo Inoue and Mamoun Nawahdah. 2014. Influence of dining-progress synchrony in time-shifted tele-dining. In CHI’14 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 2089–2094.

[31]

Håkan Jönsson, Maxime Michaud, and Nicklas Neuman. 2021. What Is commensality? A critical discussion of an expanding research field. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 18, 6235(2021), 1–17.

[32]

Denisa Kera and Nur Liyana Sulaiman. 2014. FridgeMatch: Design probe into the future of urban food commensality. Futures 62(2014), 194–201.

[33]

Susanne Kerner, Cynthia Chou, and Morten Warmind. 2015. Commensality: from everyday food to feast. Bloomsbury publishing.

[34]

Rohit Ashok Khot, Eshita Sri Arza, Harshitha Kurra, and Yan Wang. 2019. Fobo: Towards designing a robotic companion for solo dining. In Extended Abstracts of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–6.

Digital Library

[35]

Rohit Ashok Khot, Florian Mueller, 2019. Human-food interaction. Foundations and Trends® in Human–Computer Interaction 12, 4(2019), 238–415.

[36]

Sangmoon Kim. 2020. Solitary eating, an inferior alternative? An examination of time-use data in South Korea. International Sociology 35, 4 (2020), 415–432.

[37]

Kagan Kircaburun, Andrew Harris, Filipa Calado, and Mark D Griffiths. 2021. The psychology of mukbang watching: A scoping review of the academic and non-academic literature. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction 19, 4 (2021), 1190–1213.

[38]

Dannie Korsgaard, Thomas Bjøner, and Niels Christian Nilsson. 2019. Where would you like to eat? A formative evaluation of mixed-reality solitary meals in virtual environments for older adults with mobility impairments who live alone. Food Research International 117 (2019), 30–39.

[39]

Dannie Korsgaard, Thomas Bjørner, Jon R Bruun-Pedersen, Pernille K Sørensen, and Federico JA Perez-Cueto. 2020. Eating together while being apart: A pilot study on the effects of mixed-reality conversations and virtual environments on older eaters’ solitary meal experience and food intake. In 2020 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces Abstracts and Workshops (VRW). IEEE, 365–370.

[40]

Carolyn Korsmeyer and David Sutton. 2011. The sensory experience of food. Food, Culture & Society 14, 4 (2011), 461–475.

[41]

A Rom Kwon, Yeong Sook Yoon, Kyong Pil Min, Yoon Kyung Lee, and Ji Ho Jeon. 2018. Eating alone and metabolic syndrome: A population-based Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2013–2014. Obesity Research & Clinical Practice 12, 2 (2018), 146–157.

[42]

Kinneret Lahad and Vanessa May. 2017. Just one? Solo dining, gender and temporal belonging in public spaces. Sociological Research Online 22, 2 (2017), 176–186.

[43]

Eun Jung Lee, Kyung-Ran Lee, and Ju-Yeon Kim. 2020. Analysis of differences in eating alone attitude of Koreans by dietary habits and age. Appetite 152(2020).

[44]

Mailin Lemke. 2013. Dizajn. Core77 (2013). https://designawards.core77.com/2013/recipients/dizajn/index.html

[45]

Mailin Lemke and Hendrik NJ Schifferstein. 2021. The use of ICT devices as part of the solo eating experience. Appetite 165(2021), 105297.

[46]

Julie L Locher, William C Yoels, Donna Maurer, and Jillian Van Ells. 2005. Comfort foods: an exploratory journey into the social and emotional significance of food. Food & Foodways 13, 4 (2005), 273–297.

[47]

Brigida Marovelli. 2019. Cooking and eating together in London: Food sharing initiatives as collective spaces of encounter. Geoforum 99(2019), 190–201.

[48]

Estelle Masson, Sandrine Bubendorff, and Christèle Fraïssé. 2018. Toward new forms of meal sharing? Collective habits and personal diets. Appetite 123(2018), 108–113.

[49]

Derek McColl and Goldie Nejat. 2013. Meal-time with a socially assistive robot and older adults at a long-term care facility. Journal of Human-Robot Interaction 2, 1 (2013), 152–171.

Digital Library

[50]

Janet KL McKeown and Maggie C Miller. 2020. # tableforone: Exploring representations of dining out alone on Instagram. Annals of Leisure Research 23, 5 (2020), 645–664.

[51]

Yash Dhanpal Mehta, Rohit Ashok Khot, Rakesh Patibanda, and Florian’Floyd’ Mueller. 2018. Arm-a-Dine: towards understanding the design of playful embodied eating experiences. In Proceedings of the 2018 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play. 299–313.

Digital Library

[52]

Soyeon Moon, Mark A. Boon, and Meehee Cho. 2020. How can the solo dining experience be enhanced? Focusing on perceived territoriality. International Journal of Hospitality Management 88, 102506(2020).

[53]

Florian’Floyd’ Mueller, Tuomas Kari, Rohit Khot, Zhuying Li, Yan Wang, Yash Mehta, and Peter Arnold. 2018. Towards experiencing eating as a form of play. In Proceedings of the 2018 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play Companion Extended Abstracts. 559–567.

Digital Library

[54]

Hye Yeon Nam, Carl DiSalvo, Ellen Yi-Luen Do, and Sam Mendenhall. 2010. ”Dinner Party” sociable interfaces in a tabletop art project. In Proceedings of the First International Conference on Intelligent Interactive Technologies and Multimedia. IITM 2010 - Intelligent Interactive Technologies and Multimedia, 306–310.

Digital Library

[55]

Hye Yeon Nam and Ellen Yi-Luen Do. 2011. Sociable Tabletop Companions at “Dinner Party”. In International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. Springer, 459–463.

[56]

Mamoun Nawahdah and Tomoo Inoue. 2013. Virtually dining together in time-shifted environment: KIZUNA design. In Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Eork. 779–788.

Digital Library

[57]

Núria Nicolau i Torra, Mailin Lemke, and Gijs Huisman. 2022. Solo Dining at Home in the Company of ICT Devices. Frontiers in Computer Science 4 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomp.2022.818650

[58]

Radoslaw Niewiadomski, Eleonora Ceccaldi, Gijs Huisman, Gualtiero Volpe, and Maurizio Mancini. 2019. Computational Commensality: from theories to computational models for social food preparation and consumption in HCI. Frontiers in Robotics and AI 6 (2019).

[59]

Patricia Pliner and Rick Bell. 2009. A table for one: the pain and pleasure of eating alone. In Meals in Science and Practice, Herbert L. Meiselman (Ed.). Woodhead Publishing, 169–189. https://doi.org/10.1533/9781845695712.4.169

[60]

Woongchan Rah, Jaewon So, Eun-Cheol Park, Sang Ah Lee, and Sung-In Jang. 2019. Association between family dinner and BMI in adults: Data from the 2013 to 2015 Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Public Health Nutrition 22, 4 (2019), 681–688.

[61]

Phillip D Rumrill, Shawn M Fitzgerald, and William R Merchant. 2010. Using scoping literature reviews as a means of understanding and interpreting existing literature.Work 35, 3 (2010), 399–404.

[62]

Anisa Saeed, Jenny Fisher, Zinnia Mitchell-Smith, and Laura JE Brown. 2020. “You’ve got to be old to go there”: Psychosocial barriers and facilitators to social eating in older adults. The Gerontologist 60, 4 (2020), 628–637.

[63]

Fernanda Baeza Scagliusi, Patrícia da Rocha Pereira, Ramiro Fernandez Unsain, and Priscila de Morais Sato. 2016. Eating at the table, on the couch and in bed: an exploration of different locus of commensality in the discourses of Brazilian working mothers. Appetite 103(2016), 80–86.

[64]

Charles Spence. 2017. Comfort food: A review. International Journal of Gastronomy and Food Science 9 (2017), 105–109.

[65]

Charles Spence, Maurizio Mancini, and Gijs Huisman. 2019. Digital commensality: Eating and drinking in the company of technology. Frontiers in Psychology 10 (2019), 2252.

[66]

Kyo Takahashi, Hiroshi Murayama, Tomoki Tanaka, Mai Takase, Unyaporn Suthutvoravut, and Katsuya Iijima. 2020. A qualitative study on the reasons for solitary eating habits of older adults living with family. PloS One 15, 6 (2020), e0234379.

[67]

Monami Takahashi, Hiroki Tanaka, Hayato Yamana, and Tatsuo Nakajima. 2017. Virtual co-eating: Making solitary eating experience more enjoyable. In International Conference on Entertainment Computing. Springer, 460–464.

Digital Library

[68]

Wakako Takeda and Melissa K Melby. 2017. Spatial, temporal, and health associations of eating alone: A cross-cultural analysis of young adults in urban Australia and Japan. Appetite 118(2017), 149–160.

[69]

Andrea C Tricco, Erin Lillie, Wasifa Zarin, Kelly K O’Brien, Heather Colquhoun, Danielle Levac, David Moher, Micah DJ Peters, Tanya Horsley, Laura Weeks, 2018. PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and explanation. Annals of Internal Medicine 169, 7 (2018), 467–473.

[70]

Elisabeth Vesnaver, Heather H Keller, Olga Sutherland, Scott B Maitland, and Julie L Locher. 2016. Alone at the table: Food behavior and the loss of commensality in widowhood. Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences 71, 6 (2016), 1059–1069.

[71]

Margaret Visser. 2015. The rituals of dinner: The origins, evolution, eccentricities, and meaning of table manners. Open Road Media.

[72]

Yan Wang, Zhuying Li, Robert Jarvis, Rohit Ashok Khot, and Florian’Floyd’ Mueller. 2019. iscream! Towards the design of playful gustosonic experiences with ice cream. In Extended Abstracts of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–4.

Digital Library

[73]

Philip Weber, Kevin Krings, Julia Nießner, Sabrina Brodesser, and Thomas Ludwig. 2021. FoodChattAR: Exploring the Design Space of Edible Virtual Agents for Human-Food Interaction. In Designing Interactive Systems Conference 2021. 638–650.

[74]

Jun Wei, Roshan Lalintha Peiris, Jeffrey Tzu Kwan Valino Koh, Xuan Wang, Yongsoon Choi, Xavier Roman Martinez, Remi Tache, Veronica Halupka, and Adrian David Cheok. 2011. Food Media: exploring interactive entertainment over telepresent dinner. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Advances in Computer Entertainment Technology. 1–8.

Digital Library

[75]

Jun Wei, Xuan Wang, Roshan Lalintha Peiris, Yongsoon Choi, Xavier Roman Martinez, Remi Tache, Jeffrey Tzu Kwan Valino Koh, Veronica Halupka, and Adrian David Cheok. 2011. CoDine: An interactive multi-sensory system for remote dining. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing. 21–30.

Digital Library

[76]

Luke Yates and Alan Warde. 2017. Eating together and eating alone: Meal arrangements in British households. The British Journal of Sociology 68, 1 (2017), 97–118.

Cited By

Goss Hde Koning JTromp NSchifferstein H(2025)Let's get flexible: Exploring adaptable consumption toward reducing household food waste in the NetherlandsSustainable Production and Consumption10.1016/j.spc.2025.01.005Online publication date: Jan-2025
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2025.01.005
Parra MFavela JCastro LGatica-Perez D(2024)Towards Wine Tasting Activity Recognition for a Digital SommelierCompanion Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on Multimodal Interaction10.1145/3686215.3686217(108-112)Online publication date: 4-Nov-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3686215.3686217
Xue CGuo YWang ZShimizu MJeung JMi H(2024)DishAgent: Enhancing Dining Experiences through LLM-Based Smart DishesAdjunct Proceedings of the 37th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology10.1145/3672539.3686755(1-4)Online publication date: 13-Oct-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3672539.3686755
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

Commensality or Reverie in Eating? Exploring the Solo Dining Experience
1. Human-centered computing
  1. Interaction design
    1. Empirical studies in interaction design

Recommendations

The Playful Potential of Digital Commensality: Learning from Spontaneous Playful Remote Dining Practices
CHI PLAY

With one-person households being increasingly common and Covid-19 lockdown policies forcing people to stay home, remote dining has become common practice for many, who take it as an opportunity to connect with others in times of loneliness. Sharing meals ...
Mattpod: A Design Proposal for a Multi-Sensory Solo Dining Experience
ICMI '22 Companion: Companion Publication of the 2022 International Conference on Multimodal Interaction

The consumption of a meal is not just a bodily requirement but can also carry significant symbolic meaning. Solo dining is often contrasted to a shared eating experience and portrayed as an inferior way of eating a meal due to lacking essential social ...
Reconnecting with Food through Dining Play
CHI PLAY '20: Proceedings of the Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play

While the food production and processing are known to cause major environmental pollution, we as consumers have little awareness of the underlying processes that bring food from farm to plate. This lack of awareness influences our food related decisions ...

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences

ICMI '22: Proceedings of the 2022 International Conference on Multimodal Interaction

November 2022

830 pages

ISBN:9781450393904

DOI:10.1145/3536221

Editors:
Raj Tumuluri
Openstream
,
Nicu Sebe
University of Trento
,
Gopal Pingali
Accenture
,
Dinesh Babu Jayagopi
IIIT Bangalore
,
Abhinav Dhall
IIT Ropar
,
Richa Singh
IIT Jodhpur
,
Lisa Anthony
University of Florida
,
Albert Ali Salah
Utrecht University and Boğaziçi University

Copyright © 2022 Owner/Author.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial International 4.0 License.

Sponsors

SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 07 November 2022

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article
Research
Refereed limited

Funding Sources

4TU federation

Conference

ICMI '22

Sponsor:

SIGCHI

ICMI '22: INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MULTIMODAL INTERACTION

November 7 - 11, 2022

Bengaluru, India

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 453 of 1,080 submissions, 42%

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

5
Total Citations
View Citations
1,485
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)823
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)112

Reflects downloads up to 05 Mar 2025

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Goss Hde Koning JTromp NSchifferstein H(2025)Let's get flexible: Exploring adaptable consumption toward reducing household food waste in the NetherlandsSustainable Production and Consumption10.1016/j.spc.2025.01.005Online publication date: Jan-2025
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2025.01.005
Parra MFavela JCastro LGatica-Perez D(2024)Towards Wine Tasting Activity Recognition for a Digital SommelierCompanion Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on Multimodal Interaction10.1145/3686215.3686217(108-112)Online publication date: 4-Nov-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3686215.3686217
Xue CGuo YWang ZShimizu MJeung JMi H(2024)DishAgent: Enhancing Dining Experiences through LLM-Based Smart DishesAdjunct Proceedings of the 37th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology10.1145/3672539.3686755(1-4)Online publication date: 13-Oct-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3672539.3686755
Chen YYen C(2024)More Than Just Limits: How Technology Can Support Parents in Regulating Children's Eating Behaviors at Family MealtimesExtended Abstracts of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613905.3650858(1-8)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3613905.3650858
Kammoun NMeegahapola LGatica-Perez D(2023)Understanding the Social Context of Eating with Multimodal Smartphone Sensing: The Role of Country DiversityProceedings of the 25th International Conference on Multimodal Interaction10.1145/3577190.3614129(604-612)Online publication date: 9-Oct-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3577190.3614129

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

Figures

Tables

Media

View Table of Conten