research-article

The Future of Hybrid Meetings

Authors:

Marios Constantinides,

Daniele QuerciaAuthors Info & Claims

CHIWORK '22: Proceedings of the 1st Annual Meeting of the Symposium on Human-Computer Interaction for Work

Article No.: 6, Pages 1 - 6

https://doi.org/10.1145/3533406.3533415

Published: 08 June 2022 Publication History

Abstract

Meetings are typically considered to be the fuel of an organization’s productivity—a place where employees discuss ideas and make collective decisions. However, it is no secret that meetings are also often perceived as wasteful vacuums, depleting employee morale and productivity, likely due to the fact that current technologies fall short in fully supporting physical or virtual meeting experience. In this position paper, we discuss the three key elements that make a meeting successful (i.e., execution, psychological safety, and physical comfort), and present new tools for hybrid meetings that incorporate those elements. As past research has focused on supporting meeting execution (the first element), we set the roadmap for future research on the two other elements: on psychological safety by articulating how new technologies could make meeting useful for all participants, ensure all participants give and receive appropriate levels of attention, and enable all participants to feel and make others feel comfortable; and on physical comfort by dwelling on how new technologies could make the meeting experience comfortable by integrating all human senses. We also discuss the potential danger of these technologies inadvertently becoming surveillance tools.

References

[1]

Hamed S Alavi, Elizabeth F Churchill, Mikael Wiberg, Denis Lalanne, Peter Dalsgaard, Ava Fatah gen Schieck, and Yvonne Rogers. 2019. Introduction to Human-Building Interaction (HBI) Interfacing HCI with Architecture and Urban Design. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI) 26, 2(2019). https://doi.org/10.1145/3309714

Digital Library

[2]

Hamed S Alavi, Himanshu Verma, Michael Papinutto, and Denis Lalanne. 2017. Comfort: A Coordinate of User Experience in Interactive Built Environments. In IFIP Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. Springer, 247–257. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67687-6_16

[3]

Joseph G. Allen. 2017. Stale Office Air Is Making You Less Productive. Harvard Business Review(2017). https://hbr.org/2017/03/research-stale-office-air-is-making-you-less-productive

[4]

Joseph G Allen, Piers MacNaughton, Usha Satish, Suresh Santanam, Jose Vallarino, and John D Spengler. 2016. Associations of Cognitive Function Scores with Carbon Dioxide, Ventilation, and Volatile Organic Compound Exposures in Office Workers: A Controlled Exposure Study of Green and Conventional Office Environments. Environmental Health Perspectives 124, 6 (2016), 805–812. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1510037

[5]

Bon Adriel Aseniero, Marios Constantinides, Sagar Joglekar, Ke Zhou, and Daniele Quercia. 2020. MeetCues: Supporting Online Meetings Experience. In Proceedings of the IEEE Visualization Conference (VIS). IEEE, 236–240. https://doi.org/10.1109/VIS47514.2020.00054

[6]

Paul Axtell. 2016. 6 Reasons to Get Better at Leading Meetings. Harvard Business Review(2016). https://hbr.org/2016/12/6-reasons-to-get-better-at-leading-meetings

[7]

Paul Axtell. 2017. How to Design Meetings Your Team Will Want to Attend. Harvard Business Review(2017). https://hbr.org/2017/04/how-to-design-meetings-your-team-will-want-to-attend

[8]

Paul Axtell. 2018. How to Respond When You’re Put on the Spot in a Meeting. Harvard Business Review(2018). https://hbr.org/2017/12/how-to-save-a-meeting-thats-gotten-tense

[9]

Kirstie Ball. 2010. Workplace Surveillance: An Overview. Labor History 51, 1 (2010), 87–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/00236561003654776

[10]

Satanjeev Banerjee, Carolyn Rose, and Alexander I Rudnicky. 2005. The Necessity of a Meeting Recording and Playback System, and the Benefit of Topic–level Annotations to Meeting Browsing. In IFIP Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. Springer, 643–656. https://doi.org/10.1007/11555261_52

Digital Library

[11]

Jeremy Barksdale, Kori Inkpen, Mary Czerwinski, Aaron Hoff, Paul Johns, Asta Roseway, and Gina Venolia. 2012. Video Threads: Asynchronous Video Sharing for Temporally Distributed Teams. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW). ACM, 1101–1104. https://doi.org/10.1145/2145204.2145367

Digital Library

[12]

Patrick Chiu, Ashutosh Kapuskar, Sarah Reitmeier, and Lynn Wilcox. 1999. NoteLook: Taking Notes in Meetings with Digital Video and Ink. In Proceedings of ACM International Conference on Multimedia. ACM, 149–158. https://doi.org/10.1145/319463.319483

Digital Library

[13]

Jun-Ho Choi, Marios Constantinides, Sagar Joglekar, and Daniele Quercia. 2021. KAIROS: Talking Heads and Moving Bodies for Successful Meetings. In Proceedings of the International Workshop on Mobile Computing Systems and Applications (HotMobile). 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1145/3446382.3448361

Digital Library

[14]

Minje Choi, Luca Maria Aiello, Krisztián Zsolt Varga, and Daniele Quercia. 2020. Ten Social Dimensions of Conversations and Relationships. In Proceedings of The Web Conference (WWW). 1514–1525. https://doi.org/10.1145/3366423.3380224

Digital Library

[15]

Jordan Cohen. 2016. Use Subtle Cues to Encourage Better Meetings. Harvard Business Review(2016). https://hbr.org/2016/09/use-subtle-cues-to-encourage-better-meetings

[16]

Marios Constantinides and Daniele Quercia. 2022. Good Intentions, Bad Inventions: How Employees Judge Pervasive Technologies in the Workplace. arXiv (2022).

[17]

Marios Constantinides, Sanja Šćepanović, Daniele Quercia, Hongwei Li, Ugo Sassi, and Michael Eggleston. 2020. ComFeel: Productivity is a Matter of the Senses Too. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies (IMWUT) 4, 4 (2020), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1145/3432234

Digital Library

[18]

Amy Edmondson. 1999. Psychological Safety and Learning Behavior in Work Teams. Administrative Science Quarterly 44, 2 (1999), 350–383. https://doi.org/10.2307/2666999

[19]

AC Bicharra Garcia, John Kunz, and Martin Fischer. 2004. Cutting to the Chase: Improving Meeting Effectiveness by Focusing on the Agenda. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), Vol. 6. ACM, 346–349. https://doi.org/10.1145/1031607.1031664

Digital Library

[20]

Joseph Grenny. 2017. How to Save a Meeting That’s Gotten Tense. Harvard Business Review(2017).

[21]

Fahim Kawsar, Chulhong Min, Akhil Mathur, and Allesandro Montanari. 2018. Earables for Personal-scale Behavior Analytics. IEEE Pervasive Computing 17, 3 (2018), 83–89. https://doi.org/10.1109/MPRV.2018.03367740

Digital Library

[22]

Ira Kerns. 2015. The 6 Post-Event Survey Questions That Will Reveal Your Meeting’s Effectiveness. https://www.meetingsnet.com/corporate-meetings/6-post-event-survey-questions-will-reveal-your-meeting-s-effectiveness

[23]

Been Kim and Cynthia Rudin. 2014. Learning About Meetings. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery 28, 5-6 (2014), 1134–1157. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10618-014-0348-z

Digital Library

[24]

Taemie Kim, Agnes Chang, Lindsey Holland, and Alex Sandy Pentland. 2008. Meeting Mediator: Enhancing Group Collaboration Using Sociometric Feedback. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (CSCW). ACM, 457–466. https://doi.org/10.1145/1460563.1460636

Digital Library

[25]

Andrew L Kun, Orit Shaer, Raffaella Sadun, Linda Ng Boyle, and John D Lee. 2020. The Future of Work and Play: From Automated Vehicles to Working from Home. New Future of Work (2020). https://par.nsf.gov/biblio/10186623

[26]

Richard M Lent. 2015. Leading Great Meetings: How to Structure Yours for Success. Meeting for Results.

[27]

Moira McGregor and John C Tang. 2017. More to Meetings: Challenges in Using Speech-based Technology to Support Meetings. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (CSCW). ACM, 2208–2220. https://doi.org/10.1145/2998181.2998335

Digital Library

[28]

Jeanne C. Meister. 2018. The #1 Office Perk? Natural Light. Harvard Business Review(2018).

[29]

Karin Niemantsverdriet and Thomas Erickson. 2017. Recurring Meetings: An Experiential Account of Repeating Meetings in a Large Organization. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 1, CSCW(2017), 84. https://doi.org/10.1145/3134719

Digital Library

[30]

Sungkyu Park, Marios Constantinides, Luca Maria Aiello, Daniele Quercia, and Paul Van Gent. 2020. WellBeat: A Framework for Tracking Daily Well-Being Using Smartwatches. IEEE Internet Computing 24, 5 (2020), 10–17. https://doi.org/10.1109/MIC.2020.3017867

[31]

Kęstutis Peleckis and Valentina Peleckienė. 2015. Nonverbal Communication in Business Negotiations and Business Meetings. International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences 62 (2015), 62–72. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/176672/

[32]

Chao Ying Qin, Marios Constantinides, Luca Maria Aiello, and Daniele Quercia. 2020. HeartBees: Visualizing Crowd Affects. In Proceedings of the IEEE VIS Arts Program (VISAP). IEEE, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1109/VISAP51628.2020.00007

[33]

Rebecca M Quintana, Christopher Brooks, Cinzia Villanucci Smothers, Yuanru Tan, Zheng Yao, and Chinmay Kulkarni. 2018. Mentor Academy: Engaging Global Learners in the Creation of Data Science Problems for MOOCs. International Society of the Learning Sciences. https://doi.org/10.22318/cscl2018.1415

[34]

Xipei Ren, Bin Yu, Yuan Lu, Biyong Zhang, Jun Hu, and Aarnout Brombacher. 2019. LightSit: An Unobtrusive Health-promoting System for Relaxation and Fitness Microbreaks at Work. Sensors 19, 9 (2019), 2162. https://doi.org/10.3390/s19092162

[35]

Alexander Robertson, Luca Maria Aiello, and Daniele Quercia. 2019. The Language of Dialogue is Complex. In Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media (ICWSM), Vol. 13. 428–439. https://ojs.aaai.org/index.php/ICWSM/article/view/3241

[36]

Nicholas C Romano and Jay F Nunamaker. 2001. Meeting Analysis: Findings from Research and Practice. In Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. IEEE, 13–pp. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2001.926253

[37]

Anna Rudnicka, Joseph W Newbold, Dave Cook, Marta E Cecchinato, Sandy Gould, and Anna L Cox. 2020. Eworklife: Developing Effective Strategies for Remote Working During the COVID-19 Pandemic. In Eworklife: developing effective strategies for remote working during the COVID-19 pandemic. The New Future of Work Online Symposium.

[38]

Banu Saatçi, Roman Rädle, Sean Rintel, Kenton O’Hara, and Clemens Nylandsted Klokmose. 2019. Hybrid meetings in the modern workplace: stories of success and failure. In International Conference on Collaboration and Technology. Springer, 45–61.

[39]

Sanja Scepanovic, Enrique Martin-Lopez, Daniele Quercia, and Khan Baykaner. 2020. Extracting Medical Entities From Social Media. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Health, Inference, and Learning (CHIL). 170–181. https://doi.org/10.1145/3368555.3384467

Digital Library

[40]

Roger Schwarz. 2016. 8 Ground Rules for Great Meetings. Harvard Business Review(2016). https://hbr.org/2016/06/8-ground-rules-for-great-meetings

[41]

Tal Gross Tom Y. Chang, Joshua Graff Zivinand Matthew Neidell. 2016. Air Pollution Is Making Office Workers Less Productive. Harvard Business Review(2016). https://hbr.org/2016/09/air-pollution-is-making-office-workers-less-productive

[42]

Simon Tucker, Ofer Bergman, Anand Ramamoorthy, and Steve Whittaker. 2010. Catchup: A Useful Application of Time-travel in Meetings. In Proceedings of ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW). ACM, 99–102. https://doi.org/10.1145/1718918.1718937

Digital Library

[43]

Yilun Wang and Michal Kosinski. 2018. Deep neural networks are more accurate than humans at detecting sexual orientation from facial images. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 114, 2(2018), 246. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000098

[44]

Mark Weiser and John Seely Brown. 1997. The Coming Age of Calm Technology. In Beyond Calculation. Springer, 75–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-0685-9_6

[45]

Edward O Wilson. 1984. Biophilia. Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674045231

[46]

Anita Williams Woolley, Christopher F Chabris, Alex Pentland, Nada Hashmi, and Thomas W Malone. 2010. Evidence for a Collective Intelligence Factor in the Performance of Human Groups. Science 330, 6004 (2010), 686–688. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1193147

[47]

Bin Yu, Jun Hu, Mathias Funk, and Loe Feijs. 2018. DeLight: Biofeedback Through Ambient Light for Stress Intervention and Relaxation Assistance. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 22, 4 (2018), 787–805. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-018-1141-6

[48]

Roland Zemp, William R Taylor, and Silvio Lorenzetti. 2015. Are Pressure Measurements Effective in the Assessment of Office Chair Comfort/Discomfort? A Review. Applied Ergonomics 48(2015), 273–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2014.12.010

[49]

Sailin Zhong, Hamed S Alavi, and Denis Lalanne. 2020. Hilo-wear: Exploring Wearable Interaction with Indoor Air Quality Forecast. In Proceedings of the ACM CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI). 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1145/3334480.3382813

Digital Library

[50]

Ke Zhou, Luca Maria Aiello, Sanja Scepanovic, Daniele Quercia, and Sara Konrath. 2021. The Language of Situational Empathy. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 5, CSCW1(2021), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1145/3449087

Digital Library

[51]

Ke Zhou, Marios Constantinides, Luca Maria Aiello, Sagar Joglekar, and Daniele Quercia. 2021. The Role of Different Types of Conversations for Meeting Success. IEEE Pervasive Computing 20, 4 (2021), 35–42. https://doi.org/10.1109/MPRV.2021.3115879

Digital Library

[52]

Ke Zhou, Marios Constantinides, Sagar Joglekar, and Daniele Quercia. 2022. Predicting Meeting Success With Nuanced Emotions. IEEE Pervasive Computing(2022). https://doi.org/10.1109/MPRV.2022.3145047

Digital Library

Cited By

Landowski MEffert JGünther FTebart MMoerike F(2024)Beyond Hallway Chats ? Negotiating Content Awareness in Hybrid Work PracticesProceedings of Mensch und Computer 202410.1145/3670653.3677523(508-513)Online publication date: 1-Sep-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3670653.3677523
Hosseinkashi YTankelevitch LPool JCutler RMadan C(2024)Meeting Effectiveness and Inclusiveness: Large-scale Measurement, Identification of Key Features, and Prediction in Real-world Remote MeetingsProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36373708:CSCW1(1-39)Online publication date: 26-Apr-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3637370
Bailly CPometti LCastet J(2024)MarkAR: Exploring the Benefits of Combining Microgestures and Mid-Air Marks to Trigger Commands in Augmented RealityVirtual Reality and Mixed Reality10.1007/978-3-031-78593-1_11(163-181)Online publication date: 27-Nov-2024
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-78593-1_11
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

The Future of Hybrid Meetings

Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

Recommendations

"All of the White People Went First": How Video Conferencing Consolidates Control and Exacerbates Workplace Bias
CSCW

Workplace bias creates negative psychological outcomes for employees, permeating the larger organization. Workplace meetings are frequent, making them a key context where bias may occur. Video conferencing (VC) is an increasingly common medium for ...
Effects of input device familiarity on content creation and sharing in meetings
CHI EA '12: CHI '12 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems

In co-located meetings, content creation is often distributed among the group members and sharing requires transfer of content artifacts, which impedes collaboration. In this paper, we present the design of a collaborative environment to support this ...
Can a table regulate participation in top level managers' meetings?
GROUP '12: Proceedings of the 2012 ACM International Conference on Supporting Group Work

We present a longitudinal study on the participation regulation effects in the presence of a speech aware interactive table. This study focuses on training meetings of groups of top level managers, whose compositions do not change, in a corporate ...

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences

CHIWORK '22: Proceedings of the 1st Annual Meeting of the Symposium on Human-Computer Interaction for Work

June 2022

215 pages

ISBN:9781450396554

DOI:10.1145/3533406

Copyright © 2022 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 08 June 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article
Research
Refereed limited

Conference

CHIWORK 2022

CHIWORK 2022: 2022 Symposium on Human-Computer Interaction for Work

June 8 - 9, 2022

NH, Durham, USA

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

5
Total Citations
View Citations
579
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)202
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)23

Reflects downloads up to 25 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Landowski MEffert JGünther FTebart MMoerike F(2024)Beyond Hallway Chats ? Negotiating Content Awareness in Hybrid Work PracticesProceedings of Mensch und Computer 202410.1145/3670653.3677523(508-513)Online publication date: 1-Sep-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3670653.3677523
Hosseinkashi YTankelevitch LPool JCutler RMadan C(2024)Meeting Effectiveness and Inclusiveness: Large-scale Measurement, Identification of Key Features, and Prediction in Real-world Remote MeetingsProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36373708:CSCW1(1-39)Online publication date: 26-Apr-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3637370
Bailly CPometti LCastet J(2024)MarkAR: Exploring the Benefits of Combining Microgestures and Mid-Air Marks to Trigger Commands in Augmented RealityVirtual Reality and Mixed Reality10.1007/978-3-031-78593-1_11(163-181)Online publication date: 27-Nov-2024
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-78593-1_11
Abramczuk KBohdanowicz ZMuczyński BSkorupska KCnotkowski D(2023)Meet me in VR! Can VR space help remote teams connectInternational Journal of Human-Computer Studies10.1016/j.ijhcs.2023.103104179:COnline publication date: 1-Nov-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2023.103104
Takano FMano HNishii YMiyazaki JKumada T(2022)Mental State Estimation System for Virtual Meetings with Auditory Modulation2022 10th International Conference on Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction Workshops and Demos (ACIIW)10.1109/ACIIW57231.2022.10086011(1-3)Online publication date: 18-Oct-2022
https://doi.org/10.1109/ACIIW57231.2022.10086011

View Options

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Table of Contents