Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/3520495.3520516acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesozchiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Design Opportunities to Enhance Children's Engagement with Nature in Bhutan: A Working Field Theory

Published: 15 September 2022 Publication History

Abstract

Bhutan is known to the world for its rich natural biodiversity. However, with urbanization, children living in urban areas are increasingly spending their time indoors. There is potential to understand how children engage with nature and explore the design of suitable technologies to motivate children to be outdoors. We conducted an exploratory study with 11 parents and 12 children (7-8 years old) living in urban Bhutan to understand how children with their family engage with nature. We found that children experience nature physically with adults’ presence and design elements such as fantasy, sensory, curiosity, and game play with friends and siblings can enhance nature engagement. Concurrently, we found that technologies can be disruptive when children are outdoors with their friends. The contribution of this paper is a deeper understanding of how children experience nature, which is visualized through a working field theory, and a discussion of design opportunities to enhance nature interactions. 

References

[1]
Anggarendra, R. and M. Brereton.Engaging children with nature through environmental HCI. in Proceedings of the 28th Australian Conference on Computer-Human Interaction. 2016. Launceston, Tasmania, Australia: Association for Computing Machinery.10.1145/3010915.3010981
[2]
Audubon. Available from: https://www.audubon.org/app.
[3]
Beery, T. and K.A. Jørgensen. 2018. Children in nature: sensory engagement and the experience of biodiversity. Environmental Education Research, 2018. 24(1): p. 13-25.
[4]
Bhattacharya, A., J. Ghosh, T. Tezuka, and T. Bhattacharya. 2018. Assessment of low carbon transport for sustainable development in Bhutan: a general equilibrium approach. International Journal of Public Policy, 2018. 14(1-2): p. 64-103.
[5]
Braun, V. and V. Clarke. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology, 2006. 3(2): p. 77-101.
[6]
Brown, E.J.Education in the wild: contextual and location-based mobile learning in action. A report from the STELLAR Alpine Rendez-Vous workshop series. in Education in the wild: contextual and location-based mobile learning in action. 2010.
[7]
Carroll, J.M. and M.B. Rosson. 2007. Participatory design in community informatics. Design studies, 2007. 28(3): p. 243-261.
[8]
Chavez, D.J. 2009. Youth day in Los Angeles: Evaluating the role of technology in children's nature activities. Children Youth and Environments, 2009. 19(1): p. 102-124.
[9]
Chawla, L. 2006. Learning to love the natural world enough to protect it. 2006.
[10]
Chawla, L. 2015. Benefits of nature contact for children. Journal of Planning Literature, 2015. 30(4): p. 433-452.
[11]
Chen, Y., Y. Lin, J. Wang, L. Liu, C. Yao, and F. Ying. 2019. IPANDA: A Playful Hybrid Product for Facilitating Children's Wildlife Conservation Education, in Extended Abstracts of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 2019, Association for Computing Machinery: Glasgow, Scotland Uk. p. Paper LBW1611.
[12]
Cleland, V., D. Crawford, L.A. Baur, C. Hume, A. Timperio, and J. Salmon. 2008. A prospective examination of children's time spent outdoors, objectively measured physical activity and overweight. International journal of obesity, 2008. 32(11): p. 1685-1693.
[13]
Cumbo, B.J. 2019. Child participation beyond the adult realm: Participatory Design in nature-play contexts. 2019.
[14]
Cumbo, B.J., B.C. Jacobs, T.W. Leong, and A.M. Kanstrup.What motivates children to play outdoors? Potential applications for interactive digital tools. in Proceedings of the 26th Australian Computer-Human Interaction Conference on Designing Futures: the Future of Design. 2014.
[15]
Cumbo, B.J., J. Paay, J. Kjeldskov, and B.C. Jacobs.Connecting children to nature with technology. in Proceedings of the 2014 conference on Interaction design and children - IDC '14. 2014.10.1145/2593968.2610449
[16]
Drever, E. 1995. Using Semi-Structured Interviews in Small-Scale Research. A Teacher's Guide. 1995: ERIC.
[17]
Druin, A. 2002. The role of children in the design of new technology. Behaviour and information technology, 2002. 21(1): p. 1-25.
[18]
Druin, A., B. Bederson, A. Boltman, A. Miura, D. Knotts-Callahan, and M. Platt. 1998. Children as our technology design partners+. 1998.
[19]
Fails, J.A. and M. Jones, The Design of Outdoor Technologies for Children, in HCI Outdoors: Theory, Design, Methods and Applications. 2020, Springer. p. 213-227.
[20]
Gaver, B., T. Dunne, and E. Pacenti. 1999. Design: cultural probes. interactions, 1999. 6(1): p. 21-29.
[21]
Gaver, W., A. Boucher, M. Vanis, A. Sheen, D. Brown, L. Ovalle, N. Matsuda, A. Abbas-Nazari, and R. Phillips.My Naturewatch Camera: Disseminating Practice Research with a Cheap and Easy DIY Design. in Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 2019. Glasgow, Scotland Uk: Association for Computing Machinery.10.1145/3290605.3300532
[22]
Geocaching. Available from: https://www.geocaching.com/play.
[23]
Gill, T. 2014. The benefits of children's engagement with nature: A systematic literature review. Children Youth and Environments, 2014. 24(2): p. 10-34.
[24]
GO, P.; Available from: https://www.pokemon.com/us/app/pokemon-go/.
[25]
Iversen, O.S., R.C. Smith, and C. Dindler. 2017. Child as Protagonist: Expanding the Role of Children in Participatory Design, in Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Interaction Design and Children. 2017, Association for Computing Machinery: Stanford, California, USA. p. 27–37.
[26]
Kawas, S., N.S. Kuhn, K. Sorstokke, E. Bascom, A. Hiniker, and K. Davis.When Screen Time Isn't Screen Time: Tensions and Needs Between Tweens and Their Parents During Nature-Based Exploration. in Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 2021.
[27]
Kellert, S.R., D.J. Case, D. Escher, D.J. Witter, J. Mikels-Carrasco, and P.T. Seng. 2017. The nature of Americans: disconnection and recommendations for reconnection. The Nature of Americans National Report, DJ Case and Associates, Mishawaka, Indiana, USA,. Accessed July, 2017. 11: p. 2018.
[28]
Keniger, L.E., K.J. Gaston, K.N. Irvine, and R.A. Fuller. 2013. What are the benefits of interacting with nature? International journal of environmental research and public health, 2013. 10(3): p. 913-935.
[29]
Leafsnap. Available from: https://plantidentifier.info/.
[30]
Lindqvist, A.-K., D. Castelli, J. Hallberg, and S. Rutberg. 2018. The praise and price of pokemon GO: A qualitative study of children's and parents’ experiences. JMIR serious games, 2018. 6(1): p. e8979.
[31]
Lohr, V.I. and C.H. Pearson-Mims. 2005. Children's active and passive interactions with plants influence their attitudes and actions toward trees and gardening as adults. HortTechnology, 2005. 15(3): p. 472-476.
[32]
Louv, R. 2008. Last child in the woods: Saving our children from nature-deficit disorder. 2008: Algonquin books.
[33]
nationalcouncil.bt. The Constitution of the Kingdom of Bhutan. Available from: https://www.nationalcouncil.bt/assets/uploads/docs/acts/2017/Constitution_of_Bhutan_2008.pdf.
[34]
naturebytes.org. Available from: http://naturebytes.org/.
[35]
O'Hara, K. 2008. Understanding geocaching practices and motivations, in Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 2008, Association for Computing Machinery: Florence, Italy. p. 1177–1186.
[36]
Ohashi, Y., H. Ogawa, and M. Arisawa.Making new learning environment in zoo by adopting mobile devices. in Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Human computer interaction with mobile devices and services. 2008. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Association for Computing Machinery.10.1145/1409240.1409323
[37]
Ploderer, B., J. Lawrence Taylor, D. Muñoz, F. Bircanin, and M. Brereton.Diagramming Working Field Theories for Design in the HCI Classroom. in Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 2021.
[38]
Rogers, Y., S. Price, G. Fitzpatrick, R. Fleck, E. Harris, H. Smith, C. Randell, H. Muller, C. O'Malley, D. Stanton, M. Thompson, and M. Weal.Ambient wood: designing new forms of digital augmentation for learning outdoors. in Proceedings of the 2004 conference on Interaction design and children: building a community. 2004. Maryland: Association for Computing Machinery.10.1145/1017833.1017834
[39]
Sears, R.R., K. Choden, T. Dorji, D. Dukpa, S. Phuntsho, P.B. Rai, J. Wangchuk, and H. Baral. 2018. Bhutan's Forests through the Framework of Ecosystem Services: Rapid Assessment in Three Forest Types. Forests, 2018. 9(11): p. 675.
[40]
Shanahan, D. and R. Fuller. 2016. Averting the extinction of experience. Wildlife Australia, 2016. 53(2): p. 36.
[41]
Snell, T.L., J.C. Lam, W.W.-Y. Lau, I. Lee, E.M. Maloney, N. Mulholland, L. Wilson, and L.J. Wynne. 2016. Contact with nature in childhood and adult depression. Children, Youth and Environments, 2016. 26(1): p. 111-124.
[42]
Soro, A., M. Brereton, J.L. Taylor, A.L. Hong, and P. Roe.Cross-cultural dialogical probes. in Proceedings of the First African Conference on Human Computer Interaction. 2016.
[43]
Soro, A., M. Brereton, T. Dema, J.L. Oliver, M.Z. Chai, and A.M.H. Ambe.The Ambient Birdhouse: An IoT Device to Discover Birds and Engage with Nature. in Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 2018. Montreal QC, Canada: Association for Computing Machinery.10.1145/3173574.3173971
[44]
Soute, I., P. Markopoulos, and R. Magielse. 2010. Head Up Games: combining the best of both worlds by merging traditional and digital play. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 2010. 14(5): p. 435-444.
[45]
Ura, K., S. Alkire, and T. Zangmo. 2012. GNH and GNH Index. 2012.
[46]
Vella, K., D. Johnson, V.W.S. Cheng, T. Davenport, J. Mitchell, M. Klarkowski, and C. Phillips. 2019. A sense of belonging: Pokémon GO and social connectedness. Games and Culture, 2019. 14(6): p. 583-603.
[47]
Verhaegh, J., I. Soute, A. Kessels, and P. Markopoulos.On the design of Camelot, an outdoor game for children. in Proceedings of the 2006 conference on Interaction design and children. 2006.
[48]
WWFBhutan. Available from: https://www.wwfbhutan.org.bt/_what_we_do/youth_education/.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Wired, wild, wonderfulInternational Journal of Child-Computer Interaction10.1016/j.ijcci.2023.10061938:COnline publication date: 27-Feb-2024
  • (2023)Rethinking the Development of Computational Thinking Skills in Young Children through Nature PlayProceedings of the 35th Australian Computer-Human Interaction Conference10.1145/3638380.3638447(536-549)Online publication date: 2-Dec-2023

Index Terms

  1. Design Opportunities to Enhance Children's Engagement with Nature in Bhutan: A Working Field Theory

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    OzCHI '21: Proceedings of the 33rd Australian Conference on Human-Computer Interaction
    November 2021
    361 pages
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 15 September 2022

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Funding Sources

    Conference

    OzCHI '21
    OzCHI '21: 33rd Australian Conference on Human-Computer Interaction
    November 30 - December 2, 2021
    VIC, Melbourne, Australia

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 362 of 729 submissions, 50%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)55
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)6
    Reflects downloads up to 28 Sep 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)Wired, wild, wonderfulInternational Journal of Child-Computer Interaction10.1016/j.ijcci.2023.10061938:COnline publication date: 27-Feb-2024
    • (2023)Rethinking the Development of Computational Thinking Skills in Young Children through Nature PlayProceedings of the 35th Australian Computer-Human Interaction Conference10.1145/3638380.3638447(536-549)Online publication date: 2-Dec-2023

    View Options

    Get Access

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format.

    HTML Format

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media