Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/3501385.3543967acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicerConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Open access

A Decade of Demographics in Computing Education Research: A Critical Review of Trends in Collection, Reporting, and Use

Published: 03 August 2022 Publication History

Abstract

Computing education research (CER) has used demographic data to understand learners’ identities, backgrounds, and contexts for efforts such as culturally-responsive computing. Prior work indicates that failing to elucidate and critically engage with the implicit assumptions of a field can unintentionally reinforce power structures that further marginalize people from non-dominant groups. The goal of this paper is two-fold: to understand what populations CER researchers have studied, and to surface implicit assumptions about how researchers have collected, reported, and used demographic data on these populations. We conducted a content analysis of 510 peer-reviewed papers published in 12 CER venues from 2012 to 2021. We found that (1) 60% of papers studied older learners in formal contexts (i.e. post-secondary education); (2) 68% of papers left unclear how researchers collected demographic data; and (3) while 94% of papers were single-site studies, only 14% addressed the limitations of their contexts. We also identified hegemonic norms through ambiguous aggregate term usage (e.g. underrepresented, diverse) in 23% of papers, and through incomplete reporting of demographics (i.e. leaving out demographics for some participants in their sample) in 35% of papers. We discuss the implications of these findings for the CER field, raising considerations for CER researchers to keep in mind when collecting, reporting, and using demographic data.

References

[1]
2021. More about SIGCSE. https://sigcse2021.sigcse.org/info/. Accessed: 2022-3-18.
[2]
2022. NSF: Computer Science for All. https://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2020/nsf20539/nsf20539.htm
[3]
2022. UKRI: Big Data and Computing. https://www.ukri.org/our-work/public-engagement/public-engagement-stfc/engage-with-our-areas-of-science-and-technology-stfc/big-data-and-computing/
[4]
ACM. 2012. The 2012 ACM Computing Classification System - Introduction. Technical Report. https://www.acm.org/publications/class-2012-intro
[5]
ACM Publications Board. 2019. Conflict of Interest Policy for ACM Publications. https://www.acm.org/publications/policies/conflict-of-interest. Accessed: 2022-3-18.
[6]
Ahmed Al-Zubidy, Jeffrey C. Carver, Sarah Heckman, and Mark Sherriff. 2016. A (Updated) Review of Empiricism at the SIGCSE Technical Symposium. In Proceedings of the 47th ACM Technical Symposium on Computing Science Education (Memphis, Tennessee, USA) (SIGCSE ’16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 120–125. https://doi.org/10.1145/2839509.2844601
[7]
Linda Alcoff, Debra A. Barrath, Susan Clements, Jennifer Clancy, F. James Davis, Abby L. Ferber, Carlos A. Fernandez, Freda Scott Giles, David Theo Goldberg, and Susan R. Graham. 1995. American Mixed Race: The culture of microdiversity. Rowman & Littlefield.
[8]
American Anthropological Association. 1997. American Anthropological Association Response to OMB Directive 15: Race and Ethnic Standards for Federal Statistics and Administrative Reporting (September 1997). Technical Report. American Psychological Association.
[9]
American Educational Research Association. 2006. Standards for Reporting on Empirical Social Science Research in AERA Publications: American Educational Research Association. Educational researcher 35, 6 (Aug. 2006), 33–40. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X035006033
[10]
American Educational Research Association. 2011. Code of Ethics. Educational researcher 40, 3 (April 2011), 145–156. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X11410403
[11]
Gregory Anderson, Mariana Alfonso, and Jeffrey Sun. 2006. Rethinking Cooling Out at Public Community Colleges: An examination of fiscal and demographic trends in higher education and the rise of statewide articulation agreements. Teachers College Record 108, 3 (2006), 422–451.
[12]
Margo Anderson and Stephen E. Fienberg. 2000. Race and Ethnicity and the Controversy over the US Census. Current Sociology 48, 3 (2000), 87–110.
[13]
Tehreem Anwar, Arturo Jimenez, Arsalan Bin Najeeb, Bishakha Upadhyaya, and Monica M. McGill. 2020. Exploring the Enacted Computing Curriculum in K-12 Schools in South Asia: Bangladesh, Nepal, Pakistan, and Sri Lanka. In Proceedings of the 2020 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research. 79–90.
[14]
Glen Archer, Leonard Bohmann, Allison Carter, Christopher Cischke, Linda M. Ott, and Leo Ureel. 2016. Understanding Similarities and Differences in Students across First-year Computing Majors. In 2016 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE). IEEE, 1–8.
[15]
Monica Babeş-Vroman, Thuytien N. Nguyen, and Thu D. Nguyen. 2021. Gender Diversity in Computer Science at a Large Public R1 Research University: Reporting on a Self-study. ACM Transactions on Computing Education 22, 2 (Nov. 2021), 13:1–13:31. https://doi.org/10.1145/3471572
[16]
Rahul Banerjee, Leanne Liu, Kiley Sobel, Caroline Pitt, Kung Jin Lee, Meng Wang, Sijin Chen, Lydia Davison, Jason C. Yip, and Amy J. Ko. 2018. Empowering Families Facing Fnglish Literacy Challenges to Jointly Engage in Computer Programming. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–13.
[17]
Shaowen Bardzell. 2010. Feminist HCI: Taking Stock and Outlining an Agenda for Design. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’10). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1301–1310. https://doi.org/10.1145/1753326.1753521
[18]
William Bares, Bill Manaris, and Renée McCauley. 2018. Gender Equity in Computer Science through Computing in the Arts–A Six-year Longitudinal Study. Computer Science Education 28, 3 (2018), 191–210.
[19]
Colin Barnes and Geof Mercer. 2010. Exploring Disability. Polity.
[20]
Georges-Louis Baron, Beatrice Drot-Delange, Monique Grandbastien, and Françoise Tort. 2014. Computer Science Education in French Secondary Schools: Historical and Didactical Perspectives. ACM Trans. Comput. Educ. 14, 2 (June 2014). https://doi.org/10.1145/2602486
[21]
Valerie Barr. 2018. Different Denominators, Different Results: Reanalyzing CS degrees by gender, race, and ethnicity. ACM Inroads 9, 3 (2018), 40–47.
[22]
Robert Bartlett. 2001. Medieval and Modern Concepts of Race and Ethnicity. Journal of Medieval and Early Modern Studies 31, 1 (2001), 39–56.
[23]
Debarati Basu, Harinni K. Kumar, Vinod K. Lohani, N. Dwight Barnette, Godmar Back, Dave McPherson, Calvin J. Ribbens, and Paul E. Plassmann. 2020. Integration and Evaluation of Spiral Theory Based Cybersecurity Modules into Core Computer Science and Engineering Courses. In Proceedings of the 51st ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education. 9–15.
[24]
Michael M. Bell. 1992. The Fruit of Difference: The Rural-Urban Continuum as a System of Identity 1. Rural Sociology 57, 1 (1992), 65–82.
[25]
Christopher T. Belser, M. Shillingford, Andrew P. Daire, Diandra J. Prescod, and Melissa A. Dagley. 2018. Factors Influencing Undergraduate Student Retention in STEM Majors: Career development, math ability, and demographics.Professional Counselor 8, 3 (2018), 262–276.
[26]
Lisa Bender, Gursimran Walia, Krishna Kambhampaty, Kendall E. Nygard, and Travis E. Nygard. 2012. Social Sensitivity and Classroom Team Projects: An Empirical Investigation. In Proceedings of the 43rd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education(SIGCSE ’12). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 403–408. https://doi.org/10.1145/2157136.2157258
[27]
Ruha Benjamin. 2019. Race After Technology: Abolitionist tools for the new Jim code. Social Forces (2019).
[28]
Luciana Benotti, María Cecilia Martínez, and Fernando Schapachnik. 2014. Engaging High School Students Using Chatbots. In Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Innovation & Technology in Computer Science Education(ITiCSE ’14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 63–68. https://doi.org/10.1145/2591708.2591728
[29]
Patricia Berne, Aurora Levins Morales, David Langstaff, and Sins Invalid. 2018. Ten Principles of Disability Justice. WSQ: Women’s Studies Quarterly 46, 1 (2018), 227–230.
[30]
Sylvia Beyer. 2014. Why Are Women Underrepresented in Computer Science? Gender Differences in Stereotypes, Self-Efficacy, Values, and Interests and Predictors of Future CS Course-Taking and Grades. Computer Science Education 24, 2-3 (2014), 153–192. https://doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2014.963363
[31]
Michael David Black. 2016. Seven Semesters of Android Game Programming in CS2. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education. 5–10.
[32]
Emmanuel G. Blanchard. 2012. On the WEIRD Nature of ITS/AIED Conferences. In Intelligent Tutoring Systems. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 280–285. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-30950-2_36
[33]
Jennifer M. Blaney. 2020. Broadening Participation in Computing: The role of upward transfer. In Proceedings of the 51st ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education. 254–260.
[34]
Brianna Blaser and Richard E. Ladner. 2020. Why is Data on Disability so Hard to Collect and Understand?. In 2020 Research on Equity and Sustained Participation in Engineering, Computing, and Technology (RESPECT), Vol. 1. IEEE, 1–8.
[35]
George Boateng, Victor Wumbor-Apin Kumbol, and Prince Steven Annor. 2019. Keep Calm and Code on Your Phone: A Pilot of SuaCode, an Online Smartphone-Based Coding Course. In Proceedings of the 8th Computer Science Education Research Conference(CSERC ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 9–14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3375258.3375260
[36]
Dennis Bouvier, Ellie Lovellette, John Matta, Jing Bai, Jacqueline Chetty, Stan Kurkovsky, and Jia Wan. 2019. Factors Affecting the Adoption of Peer Instruction in Computing Courses. In Proceedings of the Working Group Reports on Global Computing Education. 1–25.
[37]
Geoffrey C. Bowker and Susan Leigh Star. 2000. Sorting Things Out: Classification and Its Consequences. MIT Press.
[38]
Julia Burdick-Will and John R. Logan. 2017. Schools at the Rural-Urban Boundary: Blurring the divide?The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 672, 1(2017), 185–201.
[39]
Tracy Camp. 2002. The Incredible Shrinking Pipeline. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin 34, 2 (2002), 129–134.
[40]
Francine Chambers. 1997. What Do we Mean by Fluency?System 25, 4 (1997), 535–544.
[41]
Marika Cifor, Patricia Garcia, TL Cowan, Jasmine Rault, Tonia Sutherland, Anita Say Chen, Jennifer Rode, Anna Lauren Hoffmann, Niloufar Salehi, and Lisa Nakamura. 2019. Feminist Data Manifest-No. https://www.manifestno.com/
[42]
J. McGrath Cohoon. 2002. Recruiting and Retaining Women in Undergraduate Computing Majors. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin 34, 2 (2002), 48–52.
[43]
Raewyn Connell. 1994. Poverty and education. Harvard educational review 64, 2 (1994), 125–150.
[44]
Christina Convertino. 2020. Nuancing the Discourse of Underrepresentation: a feminist post-structural analysis of gender inequality in computer science education in the US. Gender and education 32, 5 (July 2020), 594–607. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2019.1632417
[45]
Sasha Costanza-Chock. 2020. Design Justice: Community-led practices to build the worlds we need. MIT Press.
[46]
Patricia A. Crawford and Vicky Zygouris-Coe. 2006. All in the Family: Connecting home and school with family literacy. Early Childhood Education Journal 33, 4 (2006), 261–267.
[47]
Kimberlé Crenshaw. 1989. Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Antidiscrimination Doctrine, Feminist Theory and Antiracist Politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum 1989, 1 (1989). https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/uclf/vol1989/iss1/8
[48]
Kimberlé Williams Crenshaw. 1994. Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence against Women of Color. In The Public Nature of Private Violence, Martha Albertson Fineman and Rixanne Mykitiuk (Eds.). Routledge, 93–118.
[49]
CSTA. 2020. High School Surveys. https://www.csteachers.org/page/high-school-surveys. Accessed: 2022-3-15.
[50]
Quintin Cutts, Judy Robertson, Peter Donaldson, and Laurie O’Donnell. 2017. An Evaluation of a Professional Learning Network for Computer Science Teachers. Computer Science Education 27, 1 (2017), 30–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2017.1315958
[51]
Holger Danielsiek, Laura Toma, and Jan Vahrenhold. 2018. An instrument to assess self-efficacy in introductory algorithms courses. ACM Inroads 9, 1 (2018), 56–65.
[52]
Adrienne Decker and Monica M. McGill. 2019. A Topical Review of Evaluation Instruments for Computing Education. In Proceedings of the 50th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (Minneapolis, MN, USA) (SIGCSE ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 558–564. https://doi.org/10.1145/3287324.3287393
[53]
Adrienne Decker, Monica M. McGill, and Amber Settle. 2016. Towards a Common Framework for Evaluating Computing Outreach Activities. In Proceedings of the 47th ACM Technical Symposium on Computing Science Education(SIGCSE ’16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 627–632. https://doi.org/10.1145/2839509.2844567
[54]
Leigh Ann DeLyser, Bryan Mascio, and Kelsey Finkel. 2016. Introducing Student Assessments with Evidence of Validity for NYC’s CS4All. In Proceedings of the 11th Workshop in Primary and Secondary Computing Education(WiPSCE ’16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 17–26. https://doi.org/10.1145/2978249.2978252
[55]
Paul Denny, Brett A. Becker, Michelle Craig, Greg Wilson, and Piotr Banaszkiewicz. 2019. Research This! Questions That Computing Educators Most Want Computing Education Researchers to Answer. In Proceedings of the 2019 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research(ICER ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 259–267. https://doi.org/10.1145/3291279.3339402
[56]
Betsy DiSalvo, Cecili Reid, and Parisa Khanipour Roshan. 2014. They Can’t Find Us: The search for informal CS education. In Proceedings of the 45th ACM technical symposium on Computer science education. 487–492.
[57]
Stefania Druga, Jason Yip, Michael Preston, and Devin Dillon. 2021. The 4As: Ask, Adapt, Author, Analyze-AI Literacy Framework for Families. In Algorithmic Rights and Protections for Children. PubPub.
[58]
Caitlin Duncan and Tim Bell. 2015. A Pilot Computer Science and Programming Course for Primary School Students. In Proceedings of the Workshop in Primary and Secondary Computing Education. 39–48.
[59]
Ruth Dunn. 2021. Minority Studies. LibreTexts.
[60]
Ron Eglash, Juan E Gilbert, Valerie Taylor, and Susan R Geier. 2013. Culturally responsive computing in urban, after-school contexts: Two approaches. Urban Education 48, 5 (2013), 629–656.
[61]
Sheena Erete, Karla Thomas, Denise Nacu, Jessa Dickinson, Naomi Thompson, and Nichole Pinkard. 2021. Applying a Transformative Justice Approach to Encourage the Participation of Black and Latina Girls in Computing. ACM Transactions on Computing Education (TOCE) 21, 4 (2021), 1–24.
[62]
Barbara Ericson and Mark Guzdial. 2014. Measuring Demographics and Performance in Computer Science Education at a Nationwide Scale using AP CS Data. In Proceedings of the 45th ACM technical symposium on Computer science education (Atlanta, Georgia, USA) (SIGCSE ’14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 217–222. https://doi.org/10.1145/2538862.2538918
[63]
Katrina Falkner, Sue Sentance, Rebecca Vivian, Sarah Barksdale, Leonard Busuttil, Elizabeth Cole, Christine Liebe, Francesco Maiorana, Monica M. McGill, and Keith Quille. 2019. An International Benchmark Study of K-12 Computer Science Education in schools. In Proceedings of the 2019 ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education. 257–258.
[64]
Katrina Falkner, Sue Sentance, Rebecca Vivian, Sarah Barksdale, Leonard Busuttil, Elizabeth Cole, Christine Liebe, Francesco Maiorana, Monica M McGill, and Keith Quille. 2019. An International Comparison of K-12 Computer Science Education Intended and Enacted Curricula. In Proceedings of the 19th Koli Calling International Conference on Computing Education Research. 1–10.
[65]
Katrina Falkner, Sue Sentance, Rebecca Vivian, Sarah Barksdale, Leonard Busuttil, Elizabeth Cole, Christine Liebe, Francesco Maiorana, Monica M. McGill, and Keith Quille. 2019. An International Study Piloting the MEasuring TeacheR Enacted Computing Curriculum (METRECC) Instrument. In Proceedings of the Working Group Reports on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education(ITiCSE-WGR ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 111–142. https://doi.org/10.1145/3344429.3372505
[66]
Nina H. Fefferman, Eileen A O’Neil, and Elena N Naumova. 2005. Confidentiality and Confidence: Is data aggregation a means to achieve both?Journal of public health policy 26, 4 (2005), 430–449.
[67]
Todd Fernandez, Allison Godwin, Jacqueline Doyle, Dina Verdin, Hank Boone, Adam Kirn, Lisa Benson, and Geoff Potvin. 2016. More Comprehensive and Inclusive Approaches to Demographic Data Collection. School of Engineering Education Graduate Student Series 60 (2016).
[68]
Margot Ford. 2013. Achievement Gaps in Australia: What NAPLAN reveals about education inequality in Australia. Race Ethnicity and Education 16, 1 (2013), 80–102.
[69]
Pauline Foster. 2020. Oral Fluency in a Second Language: A research agenda for the next ten years. Language Teaching 53, 4 (2020), 446–461.
[70]
Batya Friedman and Helen Nissenbaum. 1996. Bias in computer systems. ACM Transactions on Information Systems 14, 3 (July 1996), 330–347. https://doi.org/10.1145/230538.230561
[71]
Nichole M Garcia, Nancy López, and Verónica N Vélez. 2018. QuantCrit: rectifying quantitative methods through critical race theory. Race Ethnicity and Education 21, 2 (March 2018), 149–157. https://doi.org/10.1080/13613324.2017.1377675
[72]
Veerle Germeijs, Koen Luyckx, Guy Notelaers, Luc Goossens, and Karine Verschueren. 2012. Choosing a major in higher education: Profiles of students’ decision-making process. Contemporary Educational Psychology 37, 3 (2012), 229–239.
[73]
Melinda M Gibbons and Marianne Woodside. 2014. Addressing the needs of first-generation college students: Lessons learned from adults from low-education families. Journal of College Counseling 17, 1 (2014), 21–36.
[74]
David Gillborn, Nicola Rollock, Paul Warmington, and Sean Demack. 2016. Race, Racism and Education: inequality, resilience and reform in policy. University of Birmingham(2016).
[75]
Catherine Wilson Gillespie and Sally Beisser. 2001. Developmentally appropriate LOGO computer programming with young children. Information Technology in Childhood Education Annual 2001, 1 (2001), 229–244.
[76]
Ingrid Gogolin, Sarah McMonagle, and Tanja Salem. 2019. Germany: Systemic, sociocultural and linguistic perspectives on educational inequality. In The Palgrave handbook of race and ethnic inequalities in education. Springer, 557–602.
[77]
Norma González, Luis C Moll, and Cathy Amanti. 2006. Funds of knowledge: Theorizing practices in households, communities, and classrooms. Routledge.
[78]
Joanna Goode. 2008. Increasing diversity in k-12 computer science: strategies from the field. In Proceedings of the 39th SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education (Portland, OR, USA) (SIGCSE ’08). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 362–366. https://doi.org/10.1145/1352135.1352259
[79]
Joanna Goode, Max Skorodinsky, Jill Hubbard, and James Hook. 2020. Computer Science for Equity: Teacher Education, Agency, and Statewide Reform. Frontiers in Education 4(2020), 162. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2019.00162
[80]
Kevin J. Gucwa and Harry H. Cheng. 2017. Making Robot Challenges with Virtual Robots. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education(SIGCSE ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 273–277. https://doi.org/10.1145/3017680.3017700
[81]
Mariluz Guenaga, Andoni Eguíluz, Pablo Garaizar, and Juanjo Gibaja. 2021. How do students develop computational thinking? Assessing early programmers in a maze-based online game. Computer Science Education 31, 2 (2021), 259–289.
[82]
Mark Guzdial. 2020. Talking about race in CS education. Commun. ACM 64, 1 (2020), 10–11.
[83]
Juergen Habermas. 1985. The Theory of Communicative Action: Volume 1: Reason and the Rationalization of Society. Beacon Press.
[84]
Juergen Habermas. 1985. The Theory of Communicative Action: Volume 2: Lifeword and System: A Critique of Functionalist Reason. Beacon Press.
[85]
Oliver L. Haimson, Jed R. Brubaker, Lynn Dombrowski, and Gillian R. Hayes. 2016. Digital Footprints and Changing Networks During Online Identity Transitions. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’16). Association for Computing Machinery, San Jose, California, USA, 2895–2907. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858136
[86]
Foad Hamidi, Morgan Klaus Scheuerman, and Stacy M. Branham. 2018. Gender Recognition or Gender Reductionism? The Social Implications of Embedded Gender Recognition Systems. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, Montreal QC, Canada, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173582
[87]
Margaret Hamilton, Andrew Luxton-Reilly, Naomi Augar, Vanea Chiprianov, Eveling Castro Gutierrez, Elizabeth Vidal Duarte, Helen H. Hu, Shoba Ittyipe, Janice L. Pearce, Michael Oudshoorn, and Emma Wong. 2016. Gender Equity in Computing: International Faculty Perceptions and Current Practices. In Proceedings of the 2016 ITiCSE Working Group Reports(ITiCSE ’16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 81–102. https://doi.org/10.1145/3024906.3024911
[88]
David Hammer and Leema K Berland. 2014. Confusing claims for data: A critique of common practices for presenting qualitative research on learning. Journal of the Learning Sciences 23, 1 (2014), 37–46.
[89]
Hector Hammerly. 1991. Fluency and Accuracy: Toward Balance in Language Teaching and Learning. Multilingual Matters 73.ERIC.
[90]
Kathleen J Hancock, Rachelle Maranon, Aaron M Montgomery, and Jodi Tims. 2021. Female Scholars in Computer Science: The Role of Family and Other Factors in Achieving Academic Success. In 2021 Conference on Research in Equitable and Sustained Participation in Engineering, Computing, and Technology (RESPECT). IEEE, 1–8.
[91]
Caroline D Hardin. 2021. “Learning from Mistakes Is the Best Thing”: Risk and Persistence at Hackathons. In 21st Koli Calling International Conference on Computing Education Research. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA.
[92]
Jean Hardy, Susan Wyche, and Tiffany Veinot. 2019. Rural HCI research: Definitions, distinctions, methods, and opportunities. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 3, CSCW(2019), 1–33.
[93]
Sarah Heckman, Jeffrey C Carver, Mark Sherriff, and Ahmed Al-zubidy. 2021. A Systematic Literature Review of Empiricism and Norms of Reporting in Computing Education Research Literature. ACM Trans. Comput. Educ. 22, 1 (Oct. 2021), 1–46. https://doi.org/10.1145/3470652
[94]
C Richard G Helps, Robert B Jackson, and Marshall B Romney. 2005. Student expectations of computing majors. In Proceedings of the 6th conference on Information technology education. 101–106.
[95]
Joseph Henrich, Steven J Heine, and Ara Norenzayan. 2010. Most people are not WEIRD. Nature 466, 7302 (July 2010), 29. https://doi.org/10.1038/466029a
[96]
Kathryn Hill and Cheri Fancsali. 2021. Bridging Professional Development to Practice: Using School Support Visits to Build Teacher Confidence in Delivering Equitable CS Instruction. In Proceedings of the 52nd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education. 725–731.
[97]
Apriel K Hodari, Maria Ong, Lily T Ko, and Janet Smith. 2015. Enabling courage: Agentic strategies of women of color in computing. In 2015 Research in Equity and Sustained Participation in Engineering, Computing, and Technology (RESPECT). IEEE, 1–7.
[98]
Lee Hoffman. 2012. Free and Reduced-Price Lunch Eligibility Data in Ed” Facts”: A White Paper on Current Status and Potential Changes.Office of Planning, Evaluation and Policy Development, US Department of Education (2012).
[99]
Anna Lauren Hoffmann. 2021. Terms of inclusion: Data, discourse, violence. New Media & Society 23, 12 (Dec. 2021), 3539–3556. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820958725 Publisher: SAGE Publications.
[100]
Sally A. M. Hogenboom, Felienne F. J. Hermans, and Han L. J. Van der Maas. 2021. Computerized Adaptive Assessment of Understanding of Programming Concepts in Primary School Children. Computer Science Education 0, 0 (2021), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2021.1914461
[101]
Paul W Holland. 1986. Statistics and Causal Inference. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 81, 396 (Dec. 1986), 945–960. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1986.10478354
[102]
Hayward Derrick Horton. 1999. Critical Demography: The Paradigm of the Future?Sociological Forum 14, 3 (1999), 363–367.
[103]
David L Hosking. 2008. Critical disability theory. In A paper presented at the 4th Biennial Disability Studies Conference at Lancaster University, UK, Vol. 14. 736.
[104]
Peter Hubwieser. 2013. The darmstadt model: a first step towards a research framework for computer science education in schools. In International Conference on Informatics in Schools: Situation, Evolution, and Perspectives. Springer, 1–14.
[105]
Peter Hubwieser, Michail N Giannakos, Marc Berges, Torsten Brinda, Ira Diethelm, Johannes Magenheim, Yogendra Pal, Jana Jackova, and Egle Jasute. 2015. A global snapshot of computer science education in K-12 schools. In Proceedings of the 2015 ITiCSE on working group reports. 65–83.
[106]
Ida Hummelstedt, Gunilla Holm, Fritjof Sahlström, and Harriet Zilliacus. 2021. ‘Refugees here and Finns there’–categorisations of race, nationality, and gender in a Finnish classroom. Intercultural Education 32, 2 (2021), 145–159.
[107]
Robert A Hummer. 1996. Black-white differences in health and mortality: A review and conceptual model. The Sociological Quarterly 37, 1 (1996), 105–125.
[108]
Petri Ihantola, Arto Vihavainen, Alireza Ahadi, Matthew Butler, Jürgen Börstler, Stephen H. Edwards, Essi Isohanni, Ari Korhonen, Andrew Petersen, Kelly Rivers, Miguel Ángel Rubio, Judy Sheard, Bronius Skupas, Jaime Spacco, Claudia Szabo, and Daniel Toll. 2015. Educational Data Mining and Learning Analytics in Programming: Literature Review and Case Studies. In Proceedings of the 2015 ITiCSE on Working Group Reports(ITICSE-WGR ’15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 41–63. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858796.2858798
[109]
Sharin Jacob, Ha Nguyen, Leiny Garcia, Debra Richardson, and Mark Warschauer. 2020. Teaching Computational Thinking to Multilingual Students through Inquiry-based Learning. In 2020 Research on Equity and Sustained Participation in Engineering, Computing, and Technology (RESPECT), Vol. 1. 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1109/RESPECT49803.2020.9272487
[110]
Sharin Rawhiya Jacob, Jonathan Montoya, Ha Nguyen, Debra Richardson, and Mark Warschauer. 2022. Examining the What, Why, and How of Multilingual Student Identity Development in Computer Science. ACM Transactions on Computing Education (TOCE) (2022).
[111]
Sharin Rawhiya Jacob, Sara Vogel, Rose K Pozos, Patricia Ordóñez Franco, and Jean Ryoo. 2021. Leveraging Multilingual Students’ Resources for Equitable Computer Science Instruction. In 2021 Conference on Research in Equitable and Sustained Participation in Engineering, Computing, and Technology (RESPECT). IEEE, 1–2.
[112]
Catherine Jampel. 2018. Intersections of disability justice, racial justice and environmental justice. Environmental Sociology 4, 1 (2018), 122–135.
[113]
Ben Jelen, Julia Dunbar, Susan Monsey, Olivia K Richards, and Katie A Siek. 2019. Utilizing the Affinity Research Group Model in a Summer Research Experience for Undergraduates Program. In Proceedings of the 50th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education. 990–996.
[114]
Britney Johnson, Ben Rydal Shapiro, Betsy DiSalvo, Annabel Rothschild, and Carl DiSalvo. 2021. Exploring Approaches to Data Literacy Through a Critical Race Theory Perspective. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(Yokohama, Japan) (CHI ’21, Article 706). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445141
[115]
Stephanie T Jones 2021. We tell these stories to survive: Towards abolition in computer science education. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education 21, 2(2021), 290–308.
[116]
Yasmin Kafai, Chris Proctor, and Debora Lui. 2020. From theory bias to theory dialogue: embracing cognitive, situated, and critical framings of computational thinking in K-12 CS education. ACM Inroads 11, 1 (Feb. 2020), 44–53. https://doi.org/10.1145/3381887
[117]
Gopinaath Kannabiran. 2011. Themself: Critical analysis of gender in Facebook. In CHI workshop paper.
[118]
Patricia J Kannapel and Alan J DeYoung. 1999. The rural school problem in 1999: A review and critique of the literature.Journal of Research in rural Education 15, 2 (1999), 67–79.
[119]
Os Keyes. 2018. The Misgendering Machines: Trans/HCI Implications of Automatic Gender Recognition. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 2, CSCW (Nov. 2018), 88:1–88:22. https://doi.org/10.1145/3274357
[120]
Amy J. Ko and Katie Davis. 2017. Computing Mentorship in a Software Boomtown: Relationships to Adolescent Interest and Beliefs. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research(ICER ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 236–244. https://doi.org/10.1145/3105726.3106177
[121]
Amy J Ko, Alannah Oleson, Mara Kirdani-Ryan, Yim Register, Benjamin Xie, Mina Tari, Matthew Davidson, Stefania Druga, and Dastyni Loksa. 2020. It is time for more critical CS education. Commun. ACM 63, 11 (2020), 31–33.
[122]
Lawrence Kohlberg. 1974. The claim to moral adequacy of a highest stage of moral judgment. The journal of philosophy 70, 18 (1974), 630–646.
[123]
Harrison Kwik, Benjamin Xie, and Amy J Ko. 2018. Experiences of Computer Science Transfer Students. In Proceedings of the 2018 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research (Espoo, Finland) (ICER ’18). ACM Press, 115–123. https://doi.org/10.1145/3230977.3231004
[124]
Richard E Ladner, Caitlyn Seim, Ather Sharif, Naba Rizvi, and Abraham Glasser. 2021. Experiences of Computing Students with Disabilities. In Proceedings of the 52nd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education. 939–940.
[125]
Richard E. Ladner, Andreas Stefik, and Brianna Blaser. 2019. Addressing Disability in CS for All. In 2019 Research on Equity and Sustained Participation in Engineering, Computing, and Technology (RESPECT). 1–1. https://doi.org/10.1109/RESPECT46404.2019.8985671
[126]
Richard E. Ladner, Andreas Stefik, Jill Naumann, and Erin Peach. 2020. Computer Science Principles for Teachers of Deaf Students. In 2020 Research on Equity and Sustained Participation in Engineering, Computing, and Technology (RESPECT), Vol. 1. 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1109/RESPECT49803.2020.9272432
[127]
Outi Laiti. 2016. The Ethnoprogramming Model. In Proceedings of the 16th Koli Calling International Conference on Computing Education Research(Koli Calling ’16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 150–154. https://doi.org/10.1145/2999541.2999545
[128]
Justin Langlois. 2020. Recuperating Conflict: Between Critical Generosity and Antagonistic Activation. Art/Research International: A Transdisciplinary Journal 5, 1(2020), 148–157.
[129]
Yinchen Lei and Meghan Allen. 2022. English Language Learners in Computer Science Education: A Scoping Review. In Proceedings of the 53rd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education. 57–63.
[130]
Robert W Lent, Frederick G Lopez, Hung-Bin Sheu, and Antonio M Lopez Jr. 2011. Social cognitive predictors of the interests and choices of computing majors: Applicability to underrepresented students. Journal of Vocational Behavior 78, 2 (2011), 184–192.
[131]
Lara Letaw, Rosalinda Garcia, Heather Garcia, Christopher Perdriau, and Margaret Burnett. 2021. Changing the Online Climate via the Online Students: Effects of Three Curricular Interventions on Online CS Students’ Inclusivity. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research(ICER 2021). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 42–59. https://doi.org/10.1145/3446871.3469742
[132]
Colleen Lewis, Paul Bruno, Jonathan Raygoza, and Julia Wang. 2019. Alignment of goals and perceptions of computing predicts students’ sense of belonging in computing. In Proceedings of the 2019 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research. 11–19.
[133]
Calvin A. Liang, Sean A. Munson, and Julie A. Kientz. 2021. Embracing Four Tensions in Human-Computer Interaction Research with Marginalized People. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 28, 2 (April 2021), 14:1–14:47. https://doi.org/10.1145/3443686
[134]
Sebastian Linxen, Christian Sturm, Florian Brühlmann, Vincent Cassau, Klaus Opwis, and Katharina Reinecke. 2021. How WEIRD is CHI?. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Yokohama, Japan) (CHI ’21, Article 143). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445488
[135]
Raymond Lister. 2016. Toward a developmental epistemology of computer programming. In Proceedings of the 11th workshop in primary and secondary computing education. 5–16.
[136]
Stephanie Ludi, Debra Bernstein, and Karen Mutch-Jones. 2018. Enhanced Robotics! Improving Building and Programming Learning Experiences for Students with Visual Impairments. In Proceedings of the 49th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education(SIGCSE ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 372–377. https://doi.org/10.1145/3159450.3159501
[137]
Stephanie Lunn, Maíra Marques Samary, and Alan Peterfreund. 2021. Where is Computer Science Education Research Happening?. In Proceedings of the 52nd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (Virtual Event, USA) (SIGCSE ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 288–294. https://doi.org/10.1145/3408877.3432375
[138]
Stephanie Lunn, Leila Zahedi, Monique Ross, and Matthew Ohland. 2021. Exploration of Intersectionality and Computer Science Demographics: Understanding the Historical Context of Shifts in Participation. ACM Trans. Comput. Educ. 21, 2 (March 2021), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1145/3445985
[139]
Amy Luo. 2019. Content Analysis | A Step-by-Step Guide with Examples. https://www.scribbr.com/methodology/content-analysis/. Accessed: 2022-1-20.
[140]
Louise Ann Lyon and Emily Green. 2021. Coding Boot Camps: Enabling Women to Enter Computing Professions. ACM Trans. Comput. Educ. 21, 2 (Feb. 2021). https://doi.org/10.1145/3440891
[141]
Tia C Madkins, Alexis Martin, Jean Ryoo, Kimberly A Scott, Joanna Goode, Allison Scott, and Frieda McAlear. 2019. Culturally Relevant Computer Science Pedagogy: From Theory to Practice. In 2019 Research on Equity and Sustained Participation in Engineering, Computing, and Technology (RESPECT). 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1109/RESPECT46404.2019.8985773
[142]
Martin N Marger. 2015. Race and Ethnic Relations: American and Global Perspectives, 10th Edition. Cengage.
[143]
Jane Margolis. 2017. Stuck in the Shallow End, updated edition: Education, Race, and Computing. MIT press.
[144]
Jane Margolis and Allan Fisher. 2002. Unlocking the clubhouse: Women in computing. MIT press.
[145]
Lauren Margulieux, Tuba Ayer Ketenci, and Adrienne Decker. 2019. Review of measurements used in computing education research and suggestions for increasing standardization. Computer Science Education 29, 1 (Jan. 2019), 49–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2018.1562145
[146]
David Mayeda, Alan France, Tepora Pukepuke, Lucy Cowie, and Marilyn Chetty. 2022. Colonial Disparities in Higher Education: Explaining Racial Inequality for Māori Youth in Aotearoa New Zealand. Social Policy and Society 21, 1 (2022), 80–92.
[147]
Cameron McCarthy. 1990. Race and Curriculum: Social Inequality and the Theories and Politics of Difference in Contemporary Research on Schooling.ERIC.
[148]
Roger McDermott, Mark Zarb, Mats Daniels, and Ville Isomöttönen. 2017. First Year Computing Students’ Perceptions of Authenticity in Assessment. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education(ITiCSE ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 10–15. https://doi.org/10.1145/3059009.3059062
[149]
Steven McGee, Randi McGee-Tekula, Jennifer Duck, Lucia Dettori, Ronald I. Greenberg, Andrew M. Rasmussen, Erica Wheeler, and Adam Shelton. 2020. Does a Computer Science Graduation Requirement Contribute to Increased Enrollment in Advanced Computer Science Coursework?. In 2020 Research on Equity and Sustained Participation in Engineering, Computing, and Technology (RESPECT), Vol. 1. 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1109/RESPECT49803.2020.9272493
[150]
Steven McGee, Randi McGee-Tekula, Jennifer Duck, Taylor White, Ronald I. Greenberg, Lucia Dettori, Dale F. Reed, Brenda Wilkerson, Don Yanek, Andrew Rasmussen, and Gail Chapman. 2016. Does a Taste of Computing Increase Computer Science Enrollment?. In 2016 Research on Equity and Sustained Participation in Engineering, Computing, and Technology (RESPECT). 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1109/RESPECT.2016.7836165
[151]
Monica M McGill, Adrienne Decker, and Zachary Abbott. 2018. Improving Research and Experience Reports of Pre-College Computing Activities: A Gap Analysis. In Proceedings of the 49th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (Baltimore, Maryland, USA) (SIGCSE ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 964–969. https://doi.org/10.1145/3159450.3159481
[152]
Monica M McGill, Adrienne Decker, and Amber Settle. 2016. Undergraduate students’ perceptions of the impact of pre-college computing activities on choices of major. ACM Transactions on Computing Education (TOCE) 16, 4 (2016), 1–33.
[153]
Marlon Mejias, Ketly Jean-Pierre, Legand Burge, and Gloria Washington. 2018. Culturally Relevant CS Pedagogy - Theory and Practice. In 2018 Research on Equity and Sustained Participation in Engineering, Computing, and Technology (RESPECT). 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/RESPECT.2018.8491699
[154]
Amanda Menier, Rebecca Zarch, and Stacey Sexton. 2021. Broadening Gender in Computing for Transgender and Nonbinary Learners. In 2021 Conference on Research in Equitable and Sustained Participation in Engineering, Computing, and Technology (RESPECT). 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/RESPECT51740.2021.9620612
[155]
Craig S Miller and Amber Settle. 2016. Some Trouble with Transparency: An Analysis of Student Errors with Object-oriented Python. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research (Melbourne, VIC, Australia) (ICER ’16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 133–141. https://doi.org/10.1145/2960310.2960327
[156]
Jeffrey Miller, Saty Raghavachary, and Andrew Goodney. 2018. Benefits of exposing K-12 students to computer science through summer camp programs. In 2018 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE). IEEE, 1–5.
[157]
Briana B. Morrison, Lijun Ni, and Mark Guzdial. 2012. Adapting the Disciplinary Commons Model for High School Teachers: Improving Recruitment, Creating Community. In Proceedings of the Ninth Annual International Conference on International Computing Education Research(ICER ’12). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 47–54. https://doi.org/10.1145/2361276.2361287
[158]
Briana B Morrison, Beth A Quinn, Steven Bradley, Kevin Buffardi, Brian Harrington, Helen H Hu, Maria Kallia, Fiona McNeill, Oluwakemi Ola, Miranda Parker, 2021. Evidence for Teaching Practices that Broaden Participation for Women in Computing. In Proceedings of the 2021 Working Group Reports on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education. 57–131.
[159]
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (Ed.). 2018. How People Learn II: Learners, Contexts, and Cultures. National Academies Press.
[160]
National Science Foundation (NSF). 2022. Program Solicitation: Broadening Participation in Computing (BPC) (nsf21571). Technical Report. National Science Foundation (NSF). https://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2021/nsf21571/nsf21571.htm
[161]
NCWIT. 2015. Survey-in-a-Box: Student Experience of the Major. https://ncwit.org/resource/sem/. Accessed: 2022-3-1.
[162]
Greg L Nelson and Amy J Ko. 2018. On Use of Theory in Computing Education Research. In Proceedings of the 2018 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research. ACM.
[163]
Kimberly A Neuendorf. 2017. The Content Analysis Guidebook. SAGE.
[164]
Lisa M Nicholson, Sandy J Slater, Jamie F Chriqui, and Frank Chaloupka. 2014. Validating Adolescent Socioeconomic Status: Comparing School Free or Reduced Price Lunch with Community Measures. Spatial Demography 2, 1 (April 2014), 55–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03354904
[165]
Safiya Umoja Noble. 2018. Algorithms of oppression. New York University Press.
[166]
Anthony Christian Ocampo. 2016. The Latinos of Asia. In The Latinos of Asia. Stanford University Press.
[167]
Michael Omi and Howard Winant. 2014. Racial formation in the United States. Routledge.
[168]
Cathy O’neil. 2016. Weapons of math destruction: How big data increases inequality and threatens democracy. Broadway Books.
[169]
Zacharoula Papamitsiou, Michail Giannakos, Simon, and Andrew Luxton-Reilly. 2020. Computing Education Research Landscape through an Analysis of Keywords. In Proceedings of the 2020 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research (Virtual Event, New Zealand) (ICER ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 102–112. https://doi.org/10.1145/3372782.3406276
[170]
Dylan Paré. 2021. A Critical Review and New Directions for Queering Computing and Computing Education. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Education(2021).
[171]
Thomas H Park and Susan Wiedenbeck. 2011. Learning web development: challenges at an earlier stage of computing education. In Proceedings of the seventh international workshop on Computing education research(Providence, Rhode Island, USA) (ICER ’11). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 125–132. https://doi.org/10.1145/2016911.2016937
[172]
Michael Quinn Patton. 2014. Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice. Sage publications.
[173]
Dudley L Poston, Jr. 2019. Handbook of Population. Springer International Publishing.
[174]
Vahab Pournaghshband and Paola Medel. 2020. Promoting Diversity-Inclusive Computer Science Pedagogies: A Multidimensional Perspective. In Proceedings of the 2020 ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education(ITiCSE ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 219–224. https://doi.org/10.1145/3341525.3387360
[175]
Heather E Price. 2019. Large-Scale Datasets and Social Justice: Measuring Inequality in Opportunities to Learn. In Research Methods for Social Justice and Equity in Education, Kamden K Strunkand Leslie Ann Locke (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 203–215. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05900-2_17
[176]
Adalbert Gerald Soosai Raj, Kasama Ketsuriyonk, Jignesh M Patel, and Richard Halverson. 2017. What Do Students Feel about Learning Programming Using Both English and Their Native Language?. In 2017 International Conference on Learning and Teaching in Computing and Engineering (LaTICE). IEEE, 1–8.
[177]
Adalbert Gerald Soosai Raj, Hanqi Zhang, Viren Abhyankar, Saswati Mukerjee, Eda Zhang, Jim Williams, Richard Halverson, and Jignesh M Patel. 2019. Impact of bilingual cs education on student learning and engagement in a data structures course. In Proceedings of the 19th Koli Calling International Conference on Computing Education Research. 1–10.
[178]
Vennila Ramalingam and Susan Wiedenbeck. 1998. Development and Validation of Scores on a Computer Programming Self-Efficacy Scale and Group Analyses of Novice Programmer Self-Efficacy. Journal of Educational Computing Research 19, 4 (1998), 367–381.
[179]
Justus J Randolph. 2007. Computer science education research at the crossroads: A methodological review of computer science education research, 2000–2005. Ph.D. Dissertation. Utah State University, Ann Arbor, United States.
[180]
Justus J Randolph. 2007. Findings from“ A Methodological Review of the Computer Science Education Research: 2000–2005”. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin 39, 4 (2007), 130–130.
[181]
Yolanda Rankin, Maedeh Agharazidermani, and Jakita Thomas. 2020. The Role of Familial Influences in African American Women’s Persistence in Computing. In 2020 Research on Equity and Sustained Participation in Engineering, Computing, and Technology (RESPECT), Vol. 1. 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1109/RESPECT49803.2020.9272503
[182]
Yolanda A. Rankin and Jakita O. Thomas. 2019. Straighten Up and Fly Right: Rethinking intersectionality in HCI research. Interactions 26, 6 (Oct. 2019), 64–68. https://doi.org/10.1145/3363033
[183]
Yolanda A. Rankin, Jakita O. Thomas, and Sheena Erete. 2021. Black Women Speak: Examining Power, Privilege, and Identity in CS Education. ACM Trans. Comput. Educ. 21, 4 (Oct. 2021). https://doi.org/10.1145/3451344
[184]
Yim Register and Amy J. Ko. 2020. Learning Machine Learning with Personal Data Helps Stakeholders Ground Advocacy Arguments in Model Mechanics. In Proceedings of the 2020 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research(ICER ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 67–78. https://doi.org/10.1145/3372782.3406252
[185]
Clara E Rodriguez. 2000. Changing race: Latinos, the census, and the history of ethnicity in the United States. Vol. 41. NYU Press.
[186]
Jennifer Rosato, Chery Lucarelli, Cassandra Beckworth, and Ralph Morelli. 2017. A Comparison of Online and Hybrid Professional Development for CS Principles Teachers. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education(ITiCSE ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 140–145. https://doi.org/10.1145/3059009.3059060
[187]
Karen Rosenblum and Toni-Michelle Travis. 2015. The Meaning of Difference: American Constructions of Race and Ethnicity, Sex and Gender, Social Class, Sexuality, and Disability.
[188]
Doreen A Rosenthal, Ross M Gurney, and Susan M Moore. 1981. From trust on intimacy: A new inventory for examining Erikson’s stages of psychosocial development. Journal of Youth and Adolescence 10, 6 (1981), 525–537.
[189]
Monique Ross, Zahra Hazari, Gerhard Sonnert, and Philip Sadler. 2020. The Intersection of Being Black and Being a Woman: Examining the Effect of Social Computing Relationships on Computer Science Career Choice. ACM Trans. Comput. Educ. 20, 2 (Feb. 2020), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1145/3377426
[190]
Jean J Ryoo, Alicia Morris, and Jane Margolis. 2021. “What Happens to the Raspado man in a Cash-free Society?”: Teaching and Learning Socially Responsible Computing. ACM Transactions on Computing Education (TOCE) 21, 4 (2021), 1–28.
[191]
Rogelio Sáenz and Maria Cristina Morales. 2019. Demography of Race and Ethnicity. In Handbook of Population, Dudley L Poston, Jr (Ed.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 163–207. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-10910-3_7
[192]
Jean Salac, Cathy Thomas, Chloe Butler, and Diana Franklin. 2021. Understanding the Link between Computer Science Instruction and Reading & Math Performance. In Proceedings of the 26th ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education V. 1. 408–414.
[193]
Kate Sanders, Sally Fincher, Dennis Bouvier, Gary Lewandowski, Briana Morrison, Laurie Murphy, Marian Petre, Brad Richards, Josh Tenenberg, Lynda Thomas, 2005. A multi-institutional, multinational study of programming concepts using card sort data. Expert Systems 22, 3 (2005), 121–128.
[194]
Kate Sanders, Judy Sheard, Brett A Becker, Anna Eckerdal, Sally Hamouda, and Simon. 2019. Inferential Statistics in Computing Education Research: A Methodological Review. In Proceedings of the 2019 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research(Toronto ON, Canada) (ICER ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 177–185. https://doi.org/10.1145/3291279.3339408
[195]
Linda J. Sax, Jennifer M. Blaney, Christina Zavala, and Kaitlin N. S. Newhouse. 2020. Who Takes Intro Computing? Examining the Degree Plans of Introductory Computing Students in Light of Booming Enrollments. In 2020 Research on Equity and Sustained Participation in Engineering, Computing, and Technology (RESPECT), Vol. 1. 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1109/RESPECT49803.2020.9272431
[196]
Linda J Sax, Kathleen J Lehman, and Christina Zavala. 2017. Examining the enrollment growth: non-cs majors in CS1 courses. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education. 513–518.
[197]
Ari Schlesinger, W. Keith Edwards, and Rebecca E. Grinter. 2017. Intersectional HCI: Engaging Identity through Gender, Race, and Class. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 5412–5427. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025766
[198]
Kristin A Searle, Deborah A Fields, Debora A Lui, and Yasmin B Kafai. 2014. Diversifying high school students’ views about computing with electronic textiles. In Proceedings of the tenth annual conference on International computing education research (Glasgow, Scotland, United Kingdom) (ICER ’14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 75–82. https://doi.org/10.1145/2632320.2632352
[199]
Mazyar Seraj, Eva-Sophie Katterfeldt, Kerstin Bub, Serge Autexier, and Rolf Drechsler. 2019. Scratch and Google Blockly: How Girls’ Programming Skills and Attitudes are Influenced. In Proceedings of the 19th Koli Calling International Conference on Computing Education Research. 1–10.
[200]
Sadia Sharmin, Daniel Zingaro, Lisa Zhang, and Clare Brett. 2019. Impact of Open-Ended Assignments on Student Self-Efficacy in CS1. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Global Computing Education(CompEd ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 215–221. https://doi.org/10.1145/3300115.3309532
[201]
Leonardo Silva, Antonio Mendes, Anabela Gomes, Gabriel Fortes, Chan Tong Lam, and Calana Chan. 2021. Exploring the Association between Self-Regulation of Learning and Programming Learning: A Multinational Investigation. In 2021 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE). IEEE, 1–8.
[202]
Audrey Smedley and Brian D Smedley. 2005. Race as biology is fiction, racism as a social problem is real: Anthropological and historical perspectives on the social construction of race.American psychologist 60, 1 (2005), 16.
[203]
Amber Solomon, DeKita Moon, Armisha L Roberts, and Juan E Gilbert. 2018. Not just Black and not just a woman: Black women belonging in computing. In 2018 Research on Equity and Sustained Participation in Engineering, Computing, and Technology (RESPECT). IEEE, 1–5.
[204]
Peter J Spiro. 1997. Dual nationality and the meaning of citizenship. Immigr. & Nat’lity L. Rev. 18 (1997), 491.
[205]
Claude Steele. 2011. Stereotype Threat and African-American Student Achievement. In The Inequality Reader(2 ed.). Routledge, 276–281. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429494468-31
[206]
Andreas Stefik, Richard E Ladner, William Allee, and Sean Mealin. 2019. Computer science principles for teachers of blind and visually impaired students. In Proceedings of the 50th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education. 766–772.
[207]
Steve Stemler. 2000. An overview of content analysis. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation 7, 1 (2000), 17. https://doi.org/10.7275/z6fm-2e34
[208]
Steven E Stemler. 2015. Content analysis. Emerging trends in the social and behavioral sciences: An Interdisciplinary, Searchable, and Linkable Resource(2015), 1–14.
[209]
Hephzibah V Strmic-Pawl, Brandon A Jackson, and Steve Garner. 2018. Race counts: racial and ethnic data on the US Census and the implications for tracking inequality. Sociology of Race and Ethnicity 4, 1 (2018), 1–13.
[210]
Burçin Tamer and Jane Stout. 2016. Recruitment and Retention of Undergraduate Students in Computing: Patterns by Gender and Race/Ethnicity. Technical Report. Computing Research Association.
[211]
Anastasios Theodoropoulos, Angeliki Antoniou, and George Lepouras. 2016. How Do Different Cognitive Styles Affect Learning Programming? Insights from a Game-Based Approach in Greek Schools. ACM Trans. Comput. Educ. 17, 1 (Sept. 2016). https://doi.org/10.1145/2940330
[212]
Jakita O Thomas, Nicole Joseph, Arian Williams, Chan’tel Crum, and Jamika Burge. 2018. Speaking Truth to Power: Exploring the Intersectional Experiences of Black Women in Computing. In 2018 Research on Equity and Sustained Participation in Engineering, Computing, and Technology (RESPECT). 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1109/RESPECT.2018.8491718
[213]
Debra Thompson. 2015. What Lies Beneath: Equality and the making of racial classifications. Social Philosophy & Policy 31, 2 (2015), 114. Publisher: Cambridge University Press.
[214]
Joseph S Tuman. 2009. Communicating terror: The rhetorical dimensions of terrorism. Sage Publications.
[215]
Sherry Turkle and Seymour Papert. 1992. Epistemological Pluralism and the Revaluation of the Concrete. Journal of Mathematical Behavior 11, 1 (1992), 3–33.
[216]
Sepehr Vakil. 2018. Ethics, identity, and political vision: Toward a justice-centered approach to equity in computer science education. Harvard Educational Review 88, 1 (2018), 26–52.
[217]
Bas Van Zadelhoff, Ebrahim Rahimi, and Erik Barendsen. 2021. Principles to Facilitate Design-Based Learning Environments for Programming in Secondary Education While Making Learning Visible in an Authentic Way. In 21st Koli Calling International Conference on Computing Education Research. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA.
[218]
Roli Varma. 2010. Why so few women enroll in computing? Gender and ethnic differences in students’ perception. Computer Science Education 20, 4 (2010), 301–316.
[219]
Rebecca Vivian and Katrina Falkner. 2019. Identifying Teachers’ Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge for Computer Science in the Primary Years. In Proceedings of the 2019 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research (Toronto ON, Canada) (ICER ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 147–155. https://doi.org/10.1145/3291279.3339410
[220]
Sara Vogel, Christopher Hoadley, Laura Ascenzi-Moreno, and Kate Menken. 2019. The role of translanguaging in computational literacies: Documenting middle school bilinguals’ practices in computer science integrated units. In Proceedings of the 50th ACM technical symposium on computer science education. 1164–1170.
[221]
Kristina von Hausswolff, Anna Eckerdal, and Michael Thuné. 2020. Learning to Program Hands-on: A Controlled Study. In Koli Calling ’20: Proceedings of the 20th Koli Calling International Conference on Computing Education Research(Koli Calling ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA. https://doi.org/10.1145/3428029.3428058
[222]
Lev Semenovich Vygotsky and Michael Cole. 1978. Mind in society: Development of higher psychological processes. Harvard university press.
[223]
Isabel Wagner. 2016. Gender and Performance in Computer Science. ACM Trans. Comput. Educ. 16, 3 (May 2016). https://doi.org/10.1145/2920173
[224]
Susan E Walden, Deborah A Trytten, Randa L Shehab, and Cindy E Foor. 2018. Critiquing the” Underrepresented Minorities” Label. In 2018 CoNECD-The Collaborative Network for Engineering and Computing Diversity Conference.
[225]
Alicia Nicki Washington. 2020. When twice as good isn’t enough: The case for cultural competence in computing. In Proceedings of the 51st ACM technical symposium on computer science education. 213–219.
[226]
Max Weber. 1948. From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology. Vol. 33. Routledge.
[227]
Tiffani L Williams. 2020. Underrepresented minority’considered harmful, racist language. Commun. ACM (2020).
[228]
Alyssa Friend Wise and David Williamson Shaffer. 2015. Why Theory Matters More than Ever in the Age of Big Data. Journal of Learning Analytics 2, 2 (Dec. 2015), 5–13.
[229]
Billy Wong. 2016. ‘I’m good, but not that good’: digitally-skilled young people’s identity in computing. Computer Science Education 26, 4 (2016), 299–317.
[230]
Benjamin Xie, Matt J Davidson, Baker Franke, Emily McLeod, Min Li, and Amy J Ko. 2021. Domain Experts’ Interpretations of Assessment Bias in a Scaled, Online Computer Science Curriculum. In Proceedings of the Eight ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale(L@S 2021, Vol. 29). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3430895.3460141
[231]
Rebecca Zarch, Sarah Dunton, Joshua Childs, and Anne Leftwich. 2020. Through the looking glass: Computer science education and the unintended consequences of broadening participation policy efforts. In 2020 Research on Equity and Sustained Participation in Engineering, Computing, and Technology (RESPECT), Vol. 1. IEEE, 1–4.
[232]
Yuanlin Zhang, Jianlan Wang, Fox Bolduc, and William G Murray. 2019. LP based integration of computing and science education in middle schools. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Global Computing Education. 44–50.
[233]
Tukufu Zuberi. 2001. Thicker Than Blood: How Racial Statistics Lie. U of Minnesota Press.
[234]
Stuart Zweben and Betsy Bizot. 2019. Taulbee Survey. Technical Report. Computing Research Association.
[235]
Stuart H. Zweben and Elizabeth B. Bizot. 2015. Representation of Women in Postsecondary Computing 1990–2013: Disciplines, Institutional, and Individual Characteristics Matter. In 2015 Research in Equity and Sustained Participation in Engineering, Computing, and Technology (RESPECT). 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1109/RESPECT.2015.7296493

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Cracking the Cultural Code: Understanding the Cultural Barriers for International CS Students in the USProceedings of the 2024 on RESPECT Annual Conference10.1145/3653666.3656078(293-301)Online publication date: 16-May-2024
  • (2024)A Realist Review of Undergraduate Student Attitudes towards Ethical Interventions in Technical Computing CoursesACM Transactions on Computing Education10.1145/363957224:2(1-19)Online publication date: 4-Jan-2024
  • (2024)You’re Hired! A Phenomenographic Study of Undergraduate Students’ Pathways to Job Attainment in ComputingACM Transactions on Computing Education10.1145/363651424:1(1-29)Online publication date: 14-Jan-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
ICER '22: Proceedings of the 2022 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research - Volume 1
August 2022
372 pages
ISBN:9781450391948
DOI:10.1145/3501385
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution International 4.0 License.

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 03 August 2022

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. content analysis
  2. critical demography
  3. demographic data
  4. literature review

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Conference

ICER 2022
Sponsor:
ICER 2022: ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research
August 7 - 11, 2022
Lugano and Virtual Event, Switzerland

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 189 of 803 submissions, 24%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)583
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)83
Reflects downloads up to 14 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Cracking the Cultural Code: Understanding the Cultural Barriers for International CS Students in the USProceedings of the 2024 on RESPECT Annual Conference10.1145/3653666.3656078(293-301)Online publication date: 16-May-2024
  • (2024)A Realist Review of Undergraduate Student Attitudes towards Ethical Interventions in Technical Computing CoursesACM Transactions on Computing Education10.1145/363957224:2(1-19)Online publication date: 4-Jan-2024
  • (2024)You’re Hired! A Phenomenographic Study of Undergraduate Students’ Pathways to Job Attainment in ComputingACM Transactions on Computing Education10.1145/363651424:1(1-29)Online publication date: 14-Jan-2024
  • (2024)Teaching Ethics in Computing: A Systematic Literature Review of ACM Computer Science Education PublicationsACM Transactions on Computing Education10.1145/363468524:1(1-36)Online publication date: 14-Jan-2024
  • (2024)The Widening Gap: The Benefits and Harms of Generative AI for Novice ProgrammersProceedings of the 2024 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research - Volume 110.1145/3632620.3671116(469-486)Online publication date: 12-Aug-2024
  • (2024)Confidence vs Insight: Big and Rich Data in Computing Education ResearchProceedings of the 55th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 110.1145/3626252.3630813(158-164)Online publication date: 7-Mar-2024
  • (2023)WEIRD FAccTs: How Western, Educated, Industrialized, Rich, and Democratic is FAccT?Proceedings of the 2023 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency10.1145/3593013.3593985(160-171)Online publication date: 12-Jun-2023
  • (2023)Developing Novice Programmers’ Self-Regulation Skills with Code ReplaysProceedings of the 2023 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research - Volume 110.1145/3568813.3600127(298-313)Online publication date: 7-Aug-2023
  • (2023)Engagement and Anonymity in Online Computer Science Course ForumsProceedings of the 2023 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research - Volume 110.1145/3568813.3600121(48-62)Online publication date: 7-Aug-2023
  • (2023)How Do Computing Education Researchers Talk About Threats and Limitations?Proceedings of the 2023 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research - Volume 110.1145/3568813.3600114(381-396)Online publication date: 7-Aug-2023
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

HTML Format

Get Access

Login options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media