Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/3491102.3517568acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

CandyFly: Bringing fun to drone pilots with disabilities through adapted and adaptable interactions

Published: 29 April 2022 Publication History

Abstract

Flying drones is an increasingly popular activity. However, it is challenging due to the required perceptual and motor skills for following and stabilizing the drone, especially for people with special needs. This paper describes CandyFly, an application supporting people with diverse sensory, cognitive and motor impairments to pilot drones. We observed an existing accessible piloting workshop and evaluated CandyFly during eight additional workshops over three and a half years using a research-through-design process and ability-based design methods. We identified users’ needs, formulated requirements and explored adaptive interactions such as using pressure-sensitive keys, adjusting controls to the pilots’ range of motion, or limiting the drone’s degrees of freedom to cope with a broad range of disabilities. Our results show that the pilots and their caregivers enjoyed flying and emphasized CandyFly’s ability to be tailored to specific needs. Our findings offer a framework for designing adaptable systems and can support the design of future assistive and recreational systems.

Supplementary Material

MP4 File (3491102.3517568-video-figure.mp4)
Video Figure
MP4 File (3491102.3517568-talk-video.mp4)
Talk Video

References

[1]
Majed Al Zayer, Sam Tregillus, Jiwan Bhandari, Dave Feil-Seifer, and Eelke Folmer. 2016. Exploring the Use of a Drone to Guide Blind Runners. In Proceedings of the 18th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (Reno, Nevada, USA) (ASSETS ’16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 263–264. https://doi.org/10.1145/2982142.2982204
[2]
Arduino. [n.d.]. Arduino. https://www.arduino.cc/
[3]
FabLab Artilect. [n.d.]. Artilect. https://artilect.fr/
[4]
Mauro Avila Soto, Markus Funk, Matthias Hoppe, Robin Boldt, Katrin Wolf, and Niels Henze. 2017. DroneNavigator: Using Leashed and Free-Floating Quadcopters to Navigate Visually Impaired Travelers. In Proceedings of the 19th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility - ASSETS ’17. ACM Press, New York, 300–304. https://doi.org/10.1145/3132525.3132556
[5]
Marta Badia, María Begoña Orgaz, Miguel Á. Verdugo, Ana M. Ullán, and Magdalena Martínez. 2013. Relationships between Leisure Participation and Quality of Life of People with Developmental Disabilities. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities 26, 6(2013), 533–545. https://doi.org/10.1111/jar.12052 arXiv:https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/jar.12052
[6]
Andrew A. Bayor, Margot Brereton, Laurianne Sitbon, Bernd Ploderer, Filip Bircanin, Benoit Favre, and Stewart Koplick. 2021. Toward a Competency-Based Approach to Co-Designing Technologies with People with Intellectual Disability. ACM Trans. Access. Comput. 14, 2, Article 6 (jul 2021), 33 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3450355
[7]
Andrew A. Bayor, Laurianne Sitbon, Bernd Ploderer, Filip Bircanin, and Margot Brereton. 2019. ”TechShops” Engaging Young Adults with Intellectual Disability in Exploratory Design Research. In Extended Abstracts of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Glasgow, Scotland Uk) (CHI EA ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290607.3299056
[8]
Mehmet Aydin Baytas, Markus Funk, Sara Ljungblad, Jérémie Garcia, Joseph La Delfa, and Florian’Floyd’ Mueller. 2020. iHDI 2020: Interdisciplinary Workshop on Human-Drone Interaction. In Extended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–8.
[9]
Margot Brereton, Laurianne Sitbon, Muhammad Haziq Lim Abdullah, Mark Vanderberg, and Stewart Koplick. 2015. Design after design to bridge between people living with cognitive or sensory impairments, their friends and proxies. CoDesign 11, 1 (2015), 4–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2015.1009471 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2015.1009471
[10]
Anke M. Brock, Julia Chatain, Michelle Park, Tommy Fang, Martin Hachet, James A. Landay, and Jessica R. Cauchard. 2018. FlyMap: Interacting with Maps Projected from a Drone. In Proceedings of the 7th ACM International Symposium on Pervasive Displays - PerDis ’18. ACM Press, New York, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1145/3205873.3205877
[11]
Marcellin Buisson, Alexandre Bustico, Stéphane Chatty, Francois-Régis Colin, Yannick Jestin, Sébastien Maury, Christophe Mertz, and Philippe Truillet. 2002. Ivy: un bus logiciel au service du développement de prototypes de systèmes interactifs. In Proceedings of the 14th Conference on l’Interaction Homme-Machine. 223–226.
[12]
Scott Carter, Amy Hurst, Jennifer Mankoff, and Jack Li. 2006. Dynamically Adapting GUIs to Diverse Input Devices. In Proceedings of the 8th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (Portland, Oregon, USA) (Assets ’06). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 63–70. https://doi.org/10.1145/1168987.1169000
[13]
Jessica R. Cauchard, L. E. Jane, Kevin Y. Zhai, and James A. Landay. 2015. Drone & me: an exploration into natural human-drone interaction. In Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing - UbiComp ’15. ACM Press, New York, 361–365. https://doi.org/10.1145/2750858.2805823
[14]
Jessica R. Cauchard, Mohamed Khamis, Jérémie Garcia, Matjaž Kljun, and Anke M. Brock. 2021. Toward a Roadmap for Human-Drone Interaction. Interactions 28, 2 (mar 2021), 76–81. https://doi.org/10.1145/3447889
[15]
J. R. Cauchard, A. Tamkin, C. Y. Wang, L. Vink, M. Park, T. Fang, and J. A. Landay. 2019. Drone.io: A Gestural and Visual Interface for Human-Drone Interaction. In 2019 14th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI). 153–162.
[16]
Chien-Fang Chen, Kang-Ping Liu, and Neng-Hao Yu. 2015. Exploring interaction modalities for a selfie drone. In SIGGRAPH Asia 2015 Posters on - SA ’15. ACM Press, New York, 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1145/2820926.2820965
[17]
Beginner’s Mind Collective and David Shaw. 2012. Makey Makey: Improvising Tangible and Nature-Based User Interfaces. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded and Embodied Interaction(Kingston, Ontario, Canada) (TEI ’12). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 367–370. https://doi.org/10.1145/2148131.2148219
[18]
Nadine Couture, Sébastien Bottecchia, Serge Chaumette, Mateo Cecconello, Josu Rekalde, and Myriam Desainte-Catherine. 2018. Using the Soundpainting Language to Fly a Swarm of Drones. Springer, Cham, 39–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60384-1_5
[19]
Melissa Dawe. 2006. Desperately Seeking Simplicity: How Young Adults with Cognitive Disabilities and Their Families Adopt Assistive Technologies. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Montréal, Québec, Canada) (CHI ’06). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1143–1152. https://doi.org/10.1145/1124772.1124943
[20]
Fédération des Etablissements Hospitaliers & d’Aide à la Personne. [n.d.]. L’école des têtes en l’air. http://novap.fehap.fr/candidats/lecole-tetes-lair/
[21]
Qicheng Ding, Jiangtao Gong, Jingwei Sun, Penghui Xu, Liuxin Zhang, Qianying Wang, and Yu Zhang. 2019. HeliCoach: A Drone-Based System Supporting Orientation and Mobility Training for the Visually Impaired. In Extended Abstracts of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Glasgow, Scotland Uk) (CHI EA ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290607.3312763
[22]
Ioanna Dratsiou, Maria Metaxa, Evangelia Romanopoulou, Foteini Dolianiti, Dimitris Spachos, and Panagiotis D Bamidis. 2021. Eliminating the gap between the use of assistive technologies and the inclusion of people with intellectual disabilities in leisure activities. Health Informatics Journal 27, 2 (2021), 14604582211005004. https://doi.org/10.1177/14604582211005004 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1177/14604582211005004PMID: 33876674.
[23]
Association Elheva. [n.d.]. Elheva. https://elheva.jimdofree.com/
[24]
Eva Eriksson, Olof Torgersson, and Annika Melin. 2018. Plan&Do: A Technology Probe Supporting Children with Intellectual Disabilities in Leisure Activities. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Interaction Design and Children (Trondheim, Norway) (IDC ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 663–668. https://doi.org/10.1145/3202185.3210796
[25]
Vinitha Gadiraju, Jérémie Garcia, Shaun Kane, and Anke M. Brock. 2021. “It is Fascinating to Make These Beasts Fly”: Understanding Visually Impaired People’s Motivations and Needs for Drone Piloting. In The 23rd International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 42, 12 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3441852.3471219
[26]
Krzysztof Z. Gajos, Daniel S. Weld, and Jacob O. Wobbrock. 2010. Automatically generating personalized user interfaces with Supple. Artificial Intelligence 174, 12 (2010), 910–950. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2010.05.005
[27]
Jérémie Garcia. [n.d.]. CandyFly OpenSource Project. https://github.com/jeremie-garcia/candyfly
[28]
Antonio Gomes, Calvin Rubens, Sean Braley, and Roel Vertegaal. 2016. BitDrones: Towards Using 3D Nanocopter Displays as Interactive Self-Levitating Programmable Matter. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (San Jose, California, USA) (CHI ’16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 770–780. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858519
[29]
Jiangtao Gong, Qicheng Ding, Yu Zhang, Liuxin Zhang, Penghui Xu, Mingming Liu, Yingqing Xu, and Qianying Wang. 2020. HeliCoach: An Adaptive Orientation and Mobility Training System in a Drone-Based 3D Audio Space. In Extended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Honolulu, HI, USA) (CHI EA ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1145/3334480.3382880
[30]
Lynne Grewe and Garrett Stevenson. 2019. Seeing Eye Drone: A Deep Learning, Vision-Based UAV for Assisting the Visually Impaired with Mobility. In Proceedings of the ACM Turing Celebration Conference - China (Chengdu, China) (ACM TURC ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 110, 5 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3321408.3321414
[31]
Marine Guffroy, Vigouroux Nadine, Christophe Kolski, Frédéric Vella, and Philippe Teutsch. 2017. From human-centered design to disabled user & ecosystem centered design in case of assistive interactive systems. International Journal of Sociotechnology and Knowledge Development (IJSKD) 9, 4(2017), 28–42.
[32]
John Paulin Hansen, Alexandre Alapetite, I Scott MacKenzie, and Emilie Møllenbach. 2014. The use of gaze to control drones. In Proceedings of the symposium on eye tracking research and applications. 27–34.
[33]
Gautier Hattenberger, Murat Bronz, and Michel Gorraz. 2014. Using the paparazzi UAV system for scientific research.
[34]
Hilary Hutchinson, Wendy Mackay, Bo Westerlund, Benjamin B. Bederson, Allison Druin, Catherine Plaisant, Michel Beaudouin-Lafon, Stéphane Conversy, Helen Evans, Heiko Hansen, Nicolas Roussel, and Björn Eiderbäck. 2003. Technology Probes: Inspiring Design for and with Families. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Ft. Lauderdale, Florida, USA) (CHI ’03). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 17–24. https://doi.org/10.1145/642611.642616
[35]
H. Kang, H. Li, J. Zhang, X. Lu, and B. Benes. 2018. FlyCam: Multitouch Gesture Controlled Drone Gimbal Photography. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters 3, 4 (2018), 3717–3724.
[36]
Si Jung Kim, Yunhwan Jeong, Sujin Park, Kihyun Ryu, and Gyuhwan Oh. 2018. A Survey of Drone use for Entertainment and AVR (Augmented and Virtual Reality). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 339–352. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64027-3_23
[37]
Pascal Knierim, Steffen Maurer, Katrin Wolf, and Markus Funk. 2018. Quadcopter-Projected In-Situ Navigation Cues for Improved Location Awareness. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI ’18. ACM Press, New York, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3174007
[38]
Kavita Krishnaswamy and Ravi Kuber. 2012. Toward the Development of a BCI and Gestural Interface to Support Individuals with Physical Disabilities. In Proceedings of the 14th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (Boulder, Colorado, USA) (ASSETS ’12). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 229–230. https://doi.org/10.1145/2384916.2384967
[39]
Logitech. [n.d.]. Logitech G-Hub. https://www.logitechg.com/en-us/innovation/g-hub.html
[40]
Wendy E. Mackay. 2003. Educating Multi-disciplinary Design Teams. In Proc. of Tales of the Disappearing Computer. Santorini, Greece, 105–118.
[41]
Mikhail Matrosov, Olga Volkova, and Dzmitry Tsetserukou. 2016. LightAir: A Novel System for Tangible Communication with Quadcopters Using Foot Gestures and Projected Image. In ACM SIGGRAPH 2016 Emerging Technologies (Anaheim, California) (SIGGRAPH ’16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 16, 2 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/2929464.2932429
[42]
Line Melbøe and Borgunn Ytterhus. 2017. Disability leisure: in what kind of activities, and when and how do youths with intellectual disabilities participate?Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research 19, 3 (2017), 245–255. https://doi.org/10.1080/15017419.2016.1264467 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1080/15017419.2016.1264467
[43]
Oussama Metatla, Nick Bryan-Kinns, Tony Stockman, and Fiore Martin. 2015. Designing with and for people living with visual impairments: audio-tactile mock-ups, audio diaries and participatory prototyping. CoDesign 11, 1 (jan 2015), 35–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2015.1007877
[44]
Microsoft. [n.d.]. Xbox Adaptive Controller. https://www.xbox.com/fr-FR/accessories/controllers/xbox-adaptive-controller.
[45]
Silvia Mirri, Catia Prandi, and Paola Salomoni. 2019. Human-Drone Interaction: State of the Art, Open Issues and Challenges. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM 2019 Workshop on Mobile AirGround Edge Computing, Systems, Networks, and Applications (Beijing, China) (MAGESys’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 43–48. https://doi.org/10.1145/3341568.3342111
[46]
Jawad Nagi, Alessandro Giusti, Gianni A. Di Caro, and Luca M. Gambardella. 2014. Human Control of UAVs Using Face Pose Estimates and Hand Gestures. In Proceedings of the 2014 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (Bielefeld, Germany) (HRI ’14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 252–253. https://doi.org/10.1145/2559636.2559833
[47]
T. Naseer, J. Sturm, and D. Cremers. 2013. FollowMe: Person following and gesture recognition with a quadrocopter. In 2013 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. 624–630.
[48]
Amin Nourmohammadi, Mohammad Jafari, and Thorsten O Zander. 2018. A survey on unmanned aerial vehicle remote control using brain–computer interface. IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems 48, 4 (2018), 337–348.
[49]
Kevin Pfeil, Seng Lee Koh, and Joseph LaViola. 2013. Exploring 3d Gesture Metaphors for Interaction with Unmanned Aerial Vehicles. In Proceedings of the 2013 International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (Santa Monica, California, USA) (IUI ’13). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 257–266. https://doi.org/10.1145/2449396.2449429
[50]
Betsy Phillips and Hongxin Zhao. 1993. Predictors of assistive technology abandonment.Assistive technology : the official journal of RESNA 5, 1 (jan 1993), 36–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400435.1993.10132205
[51]
Catherine Plaisant, Allison Druin, Corinna Lathan, Kapil Dakhane, Kris Edwards, Jack Maxwell Vice, and Jaime Montemayor. 2000. A Storytelling Robot for Pediatric Rehabilitation. In Proceedings of the Fourth International ACM Conference on Assistive Technologies (Arlington, Virginia, USA) (Assets ’00). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 50–55. https://doi.org/10.1145/354324.354338
[52]
Plux. [n.d.]. BITalino open-source biosignals platform. https://www.pluxbiosignals.com/collections/bitalino
[53]
Andrea Sanna, Fabrizio Lamberti, Gianluca Paravati, and Federico Manuri. 2013. A Kinect-based natural interface for quadrotor control. Entertainment Computing 4, 3 (2013), 179 – 186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.entcom.2013.01.001
[54]
A. Sarkar, K. A. Patel, R. K. Ganesh Ram, and G. K. Capoor. 2016. Gesture control of drone using a motion controller. In 2016 International Conference on Industrial Informatics and Computer Systems (CIICS). 1–5.
[55]
Jurgen Scheible, Markus Funk, Klen Copic Pucihar, Matjaz Kljun, Mark Lochrie, Paul Egglestone, and Peter Skrlj. 2017. Using Drones for Art and Exergaming. IEEE Pervasive Computing 16, 1 (jan 2017), 48–56. https://doi.org/10.1109/MPRV.2017.4
[56]
David Schneider. 2015. Is US drone racing legal? Maaaaybe. IEEE Spectrum 52, 11 (2015), 19–20.
[57]
Matthias Seuter, Eduardo Rodriguez Macrillante, Gernot Bauer, and Christian Kray. 2018. Running with Drones: Desired Services and Control Gestures. In Proceedings of the 30th Australian Conference on Computer-Human Interaction (Melbourne, Australia) (OzCHI ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 384–395. https://doi.org/10.1145/3292147.3292156
[58]
D. Tezza and M. Andujar. 2019. The State-of-the-Art of Human–Drone Interaction: A Survey. IEEE Access 7(2019), 167438–167454.
[59]
Jelle van Dijk, Niels Hendriks, Christopher Frauenberger, Fenne Verhoeven, Karin Slegers, Eva Brandt, and Rita Maldonado Branco. 2016. Empowering People with Impairments: How Participatory Methods Can Inform the Design of Empowering Artifacts. In Proceedings of the 14th Participatory Design Conference: Short Papers, Interactive Exhibitions, Workshops - Volume 2(Aarhus, Denmark) (PDC ’16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 121–122. https://doi.org/10.1145/2948076.2948101
[60]
Rosalie H Wang, Alex Mihailidis, Tilak Dutta, and Geoff R Fernie. 2011. Usability testing of multimodal feedback interface and simulated collision-avoidance power wheelchair for long-term-care home residents with cognitive impairments.Journal of Rehabilitation Research & Development 48, 7(2011).
[61]
WEPULSIT. 2020. pulsit. http://wepulsit.com/.
[62]
Jacob O. Wobbrock, Shaun K. Kane, Krzysztof Z. Gajos, Susumu Harada, and Jon Froehlich. 2011. Ability-Based Design: Concept, Principles and Examples. ACM Trans. Access. Comput. 3, 3, Article 9 (apr 2011), 27 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/1952383.1952384
[63]
John Zimmerman, Jodi Forlizzi, and Shelley Evenson. 2007. Research through Design as a Method for Interaction Design Research in HCI. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (San Jose, California, USA) (CHI ’07). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 493–502. https://doi.org/10.1145/1240624.1240704

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Drones as Accessibility Probes in Able-Bodied Norms: Insights from People with Lived Experiences of DisabilitiesProceedings of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3643834.3661580(2946-2957)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
  • (2023)Cleared for Safe Take-off? Improving the Usability of Mission Preparation to Mitigate the Safety Risks of Drone OperationsProceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3544548.3581003(1-17)Online publication date: 19-Apr-2023
  • (2023)“Do I Run Away?”: Proximity, Stress and Discomfort in Human-Drone Interaction in Real and Virtual EnvironmentsHuman-Computer Interaction – INTERACT 202310.1007/978-3-031-42283-6_29(525-551)Online publication date: 28-Aug-2023

Index Terms

  1. CandyFly: Bringing fun to drone pilots with disabilities through adapted and adaptable interactions

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

        Information & Contributors

        Information

        Published In

        cover image ACM Conferences
        CHI '22: Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
        April 2022
        10459 pages
        ISBN:9781450391573
        DOI:10.1145/3491102
        © 2022 Association for Computing Machinery. ACM acknowledges that this contribution was authored or co-authored by an employee, contractor or affiliate of a national government. As such, the Government retains a nonexclusive, royalty-free right to publish or reproduce this article, or to allow others to do so, for Government purposes only.

        Sponsors

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        Published: 29 April 2022

        Permissions

        Request permissions for this article.

        Check for updates

        Author Tags

        1. Accessibility
        2. Automation
        3. Drones
        4. Human-Drone Interaction
        5. Piloting
        6. Unmanned Aerial Vehicles

        Qualifiers

        • Research-article
        • Research
        • Refereed limited

        Conference

        CHI '22
        Sponsor:
        CHI '22: CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
        April 29 - May 5, 2022
        LA, New Orleans, USA

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate 6,199 of 26,314 submissions, 24%

        Upcoming Conference

        CHI 2025
        ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
        April 26 - May 1, 2025
        Yokohama , Japan

        Contributors

        Other Metrics

        Bibliometrics & Citations

        Bibliometrics

        Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)99
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)11
        Reflects downloads up to 16 Dec 2024

        Other Metrics

        Citations

        Cited By

        View all
        • (2024)Drones as Accessibility Probes in Able-Bodied Norms: Insights from People with Lived Experiences of DisabilitiesProceedings of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3643834.3661580(2946-2957)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
        • (2023)Cleared for Safe Take-off? Improving the Usability of Mission Preparation to Mitigate the Safety Risks of Drone OperationsProceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3544548.3581003(1-17)Online publication date: 19-Apr-2023
        • (2023)“Do I Run Away?”: Proximity, Stress and Discomfort in Human-Drone Interaction in Real and Virtual EnvironmentsHuman-Computer Interaction – INTERACT 202310.1007/978-3-031-42283-6_29(525-551)Online publication date: 28-Aug-2023

        View Options

        Login options

        View options

        PDF

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader

        HTML Format

        View this article in HTML Format.

        HTML Format

        Media

        Figures

        Other

        Tables

        Share

        Share

        Share this Publication link

        Share on social media