short-paper

Examining Embodied Sensation and Perception in Singing

Author:

Courtney N. ReedAuthors Info & Claims

TEI '22: Proceedings of the Sixteenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction

Article No.: 47, Pages 1 - 7

https://doi.org/10.1145/3490149.3503581

Published: 13 February 2022 Publication History

Abstract

This paper introduces my PhD research on the relationship which vocalists have with their voice. The voice, both instrument and body, provides a unique perspective to examine embodied practice. The interaction with the voice is largely without a physical interface and it is difficult to describe the sensation of singing; however, voice pedagogy has been successful at using metaphor to communicate sensory experience between student and teacher. I examine the voice through several different perspectives, including experiential, physiological, and communicative interactions, and explore how we convey sensations in voice pedagogy and how perception of the body is shaped through experience living in it. Further, through externalising internal movement using sonified surface electromyography, I aim to give presence to aspects of vocal movement which have become subconscious or automatic. The findings of this PhD will provide understanding of how we perceive the experience of living within the body and perform through using the body as an instrument.

References

[1]

Mereditch A. Achey, Mike Z. He, and Lee M. Akst. 2016. Vocal Hygiene Habits and Vocal Handicap Among Conservatory Students of Classical Singing. Journal of Voice 30, 2 (2016), 192–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2015.02.003

[2]

Newton B. Armstrong. 2007. An enactive approach to digital musical instrument design–Theory, Models, Techniques. VDM Verlag.

[3]

Freya Bailes. 2006. The use of experience-sampling methods to monitor musical imagery in everyday life. Musicae Scientiae 10, 2 (2006), 173–190. https://doi.org/10.1177/102986490601000202

[4]

Vincent Becker, Pietro Oldrati, Liliana Barrios, and Gábor Sörös. 2018. TouchSense: Classifying and Measuring the Force of Finger Touches with an Electromyography Armband. In Proc. Augmented Human International Conference (AH ’18). ACM, New York, NY, USA. https://doi.org/10.1145/3174910.3174947

Digital Library

[5]

Guillermo Bernal, Dishaan Ahuja, and Federico Casalegno. 2010. EMG-based biofeedback tool for augmenting manual fabrication and improved exchange of empirical knowledge. In Proc. ACM XVI International Conference on Human Computer Interaction (Interacción ’15). 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1145/2829875.2829932

Digital Library

[6]

Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology 3, 2 (2006), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

[7]

Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2012. Thematic Analysis. In APA Handbook of Research Methods in Psychology, H. Cooper, P. M Camic, D. L. Long, A. T. Panter, D. Rindskopf, and K. J. Sher (Eds.). Vol. 2: Research Designs: Quantitative, Qualitative, Neuropsychological, and Biological. American Psychological Association, Washington.

[8]

Rachel M. Brown and Caroline Palmer. 2012. Auditory–motor learning influences auditory memory for music. Memory & Cognition 40, 4 (2012), 567–578. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-011-0177-x

[9]

Jean Callaghan. 1998. Singing Teachers and Voice Science - An Evaluation of Voice Teaching in Australian Tertiary Institutions. Research Studies in Music Education 10, 1 (1998), 25–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/1321103X9801000103

[10]

Yves Candau, Jules Françoise, Sarah Fdili Alaoui, and Thecla Schiphorst. 2017. Cultivating kinaesthetic awareness through interaction. In Proceedings of MOCO’17, United Kingdom, June 2017, 8 pages. 28–30. https://doi.org/10.1145/3077981.3078042

Digital Library

[11]

Hillel J. Chiel and Randall D. Beer. 1997. The brain has a body: adaptive behavior emerges from interactions of nervous system, body and environment. In Trends in Neurosciences 20, 12 (1997), 553–557. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0166-2236(97)01149-1

[12]

Rubana Chowdhury, Mamun B. I. Reaz, Mohd Alauddin Bin Mohd Ali, Ashrif A. A. Bakar, Kalaivani Chellappan, and Tae. G. Chang. 2013. Surface Electromyography Signal Processing and Classification Techniques. Sensors 13, 9 (2013). https://doi.org/10.3390/s130912431

[13]

Enrico Costanza, Samuel A. Inverso, and Rebecca Allen. 2005. Toward subtle intimate interfaces for mobile devices using an EMG controller. In Proc. CHI’05: SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 481–489. https://doi.org/10.1145/1054972.1055039

Digital Library

[14]

Kelsey Cotton, Pedro Sanches, Vasiliki Tsaknaki, and Pavel Karpashevich. 2021. The Body Electric: A NIME designed through and with the somatic experience of singing. Proc. New Interfaces for Musical Expression (NIME). https://doi.org/10.21428/92fbeb44.ec9f8fdd https://nime.pubpub.org/pub/ntm5kbux.

[15]

Jennifer Cumming and Sarah E. Williams. 2012. The Role of Imagery in Performance. Oxford University Press, Oxford. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199731763.013.0011

[16]

Marco Donnarumma, Baptiste Caramiaux, and Atau Tanaka. 2013. Combining EMG and MMG sensing for musical practice. In Proc. New Interfaces for Musical Expression (NIME), Daejeon, Korea, May 27-30, 2013.

[17]

Paul Dourish. 1980. Where the action is: the foundations of embodied interaction. MIT Press, Cambridge.

[18]

Marco Dozza, Fay B. Horak, and Lorenzo Chiari. 2007. Auditory biofeedback substitutes for loss of sensory information in maintaining stance. Experimental Brain Research 178, 1 (2007), 37–48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-006-0709-y

[19]

Roslyn Dunbar-Wells. 1997. The relevance of metaphor in voice teaching: A comparative study of Sinus Tone Production and Vocal Cord Theories. Ph. D. Dissertation. University of Reading, UK.

[20]

Roslyn Dunbar-Wells. 1999. The Relevance of Metaphor to Effective Voice Teaching Strategies. Australian Voice 5(1999), 50–59.

[21]

Roslyn Dunbar-Wells. 2003. Using appropriate language modes and explicit teaching aids. Australian Voice 9(2003), 63–68.

[22]

Alfred O. Effenberg. 2004. Using Sonification to Enhance Perception and Reproduction Accuracy of Human Movement Patterns. In Proc. International Workshop on Interactive Sonification, Bielefeld, Germany. 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/MMUL.2005.31

Digital Library

[23]

Shirlee Emmons and Alma Thomas. 1998. Power performance for singers: Transcending the barriers. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

[24]

Cagri Erdem and Alexander Refsum Jensenius. 2020. RAW: Exploring Control Structures for Muscle-based Interaction in Collective Improvisation. In Proc. New Interfaces for Musical Expression (NIME), Royal Birmingham Conservatoire, Birmingham, UK.

[25]

Cagri Erdem, Qichao Lan, and Alexander Refsum Jensenius. 2020. Excploring Relationships Between Effort, Motiion, and Sound IN New Musical Instruments. Human Technology 16, 3 (2020), 310–347. https://doi.org/10.17011/ht/urn.202011256767

[26]

Thomas Erickson. 2010. The design and long-term use of a personal electronic notebook. In Proc. CHI ‘96, ACM Press. 11–18. https://doi.org/10.1145/238386.238392

Digital Library

[27]

George Essl and Sile O’Modhrain. 2006. An enactive approach to the design of new tangible musical instruments; The design of new tangible musical instruments. Organised Sound 11, 3 (2006), 285–296. https://doi.org/10.1017/S135577180600152X

Digital Library

[28]

Federico Fontana, Hanna Järveläinen, Stefano Papetti, Federico Avanzini, Giorgio Klauer, and Lorenzo Malavolta. July 30-31 & Aug 1, 2015. Rendering and Subjective Evaluation of Real Vs. Synthetic Vibrotactile Cues on a Digital Piano Keyboard. In Proc. Sound and Music Computing (SMC-15), Maynooth, Ireland. 161–167.

[29]

Christopher Frauenberger. 2019. Entanglement HCI The Next Wave?ACM Transactions in Computer-Human Interaction 27, 1(2019), 2:27 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3364998

Digital Library

[30]

Tom Froese and Shaun Gallagher. 2010. Phenomenology and Artificial Life: Toward a Technological Supplementation of Phenomenological Methodology. Husserl Studies 26, 2 (2010), 83–106. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10743-010-9071-9

[31]

Shaun Gallagher. 2006. How the Body Shapes the Mind. Oxford University Press, USA.

[32]

Shaun Gallagher and Dan Zahavi. 2012. The Phenomenological Mind: An Introduction to Philosophy of Mind and Cognitive Science, 2nd edition. Routledge.

[33]

Linda I. Garrity. 1977. Electromyography: A review of the current status of subvocal speech research. Memory & Cognition 5, 6 (1977), 615–622. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197407

[34]

William W. Gaver. 2006. The video window: my life with a ludic system. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 10, 2-3 (2006), 60–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-005-0002-2

Digital Library

[35]

William W. Gaver, Jacob Beaver, and Steve Benford. 2003. Ambiguity as a Resource for Design. In Proc. CHI. 2003. 233–240. https://doi.org/10.1145/642611.642653

Digital Library

[36]

Rolf Inge Godøy and Harald Jørgensen. 2001. Musical Imagery. Number 5 in Studies on New Music Research. Swets & Zeitlinger, Lisse, Netherlands.

[37]

Werner Goebl and Caroline Palmer. 2008. Tactile feedback and timing accuracy in piano performance. Experimental Brain Research 186, 3 (2008), 471–479. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-007-1252-1

[38]

Elizabeth Goodman, Erik Stolterman, and Ron Wakkary. 2011. Understanding Interaction Design Practices. In Proc. CHI 2011, May 7–12, 2011, Vancouver, BC, Canada. 1061–1070 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/1978942.1979100

Digital Library

[39]

Barry Green and W. Timothy Gallwey. 1986. The inner game of music. Anchor Press/Doubleday, New York.

[40]

George Grouios. 1992. Mental practice: A review. Journal of Sport Behavior 15, 1 (1992), 42–59.

[41]

Horst Günter. 1992. Mental concepts in singing: A psychological approach, Part 1. The National Association of Teachers of Singing Journal 48, 5(1992), 46.

[42]

Horst Günter. 1992. Mental concepts in singing: A psychological approach, Part 2. The National Association of Teachers of Singing Journal 49, 1(1992), 4–6.

[43]

Bruce D. Hale. 1982. The effects of internal and external imagery on muscular and ocular concomitants. Journal of Sport Psychology 4 (1982), 379–387.

[44]

Bruce D. Hale. 1994. Imagery Perspectives and Learning in Sports Performance. In Imagery in Sports and Physical Performance, A. A. Sheikh and E. R. Korn (Eds.). Baywood, New York, 75–96.

[45]

Andrea R. Halpern. 2015. Differences in auditory imagery self-report predict neural and behavioral outcomes. Psychomusicology: Music, Mind, and Brain 25, 1 (2015), 37–47. https://doi.org/10.1037/pmu0000081

[46]

William J. Hardcastle. 1976. Physiology of Speech Production: An Introduction for Speech Scientists. Academic Press Inc., London.

[47]

Kate Hartman, Boris Kourtoukov, and Erin Lewis. 2018. Kinetic Body Extensions for Social Interactions. In Proc. Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction (TEI ’18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 736–739. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173225.3173333

Digital Library

[48]

Martin Heidegger. 1967. Being and Time. Blackwell, Oxford.

[49]

Thomas Hemsley. 1998. Singing and imagination: A human approach to a great musical tradition. Oxford University Press, Oxford/New York.

[50]

Zebulon Highben and Caroline Palmer. 2004. Effects of Auditory and Motor Mental Practice in Memorized Piano Performance. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education (2004), 1–8.

[51]

Jerome Hines. 1983. Great singers on great singing. Victor Gollancz, London.

[52]

Atsushi Hiyama, Yusuke Doyama, Kento Kakurai, Hidetoshi Namiki, Masaaki Miyasako, and Michitaka Hirose. 2010. Archiving and transferring of traditional artisanship focused on interaction between artisan and tools. In Proc. 16th International Conference on Virtual Systems and Multimedia, Seoul, South Korea. 171–176. https://doi.org/10.1109/VSMM.2010.5665987

[53]

Patricia Holmes. 2005. Imagination in practice: a study of the integrated roles of interpretation, imagery and technique in the learning and memorisation processes of two experienced solo performers. British Journal of Music Education 32, 3 (2005), 217–235. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0265051705006613

[54]

Kristina Höök. 2010. Transferring Qualities from Horseback Riding to Design. In Proc. NordiCHI 2010, October 16–20, 2010, Reykjavik, Iceland. 226–235. https://doi.org/10.3390/informatics5010008

[55]

Kristina Höök. 2018. Designing with the Body: Somaesthetic Interaction Design. MIT Press.

[56]

Kristina Höök, Baptiste Caramiaux, Cumhur Erkut, Jodi Forlizzi, Nassrin Hajinejad, Michael Haller, Caroline C. M. Hummels, Katherine Isbister, Martin Jonsson, George Khut, Lian Loke, Danielle Lottridge, Patrizia Marti, Edward Melcer, Florian F. Müller, Marianne G. Petersen, Thecla Schiphorst, Elena M. Segura, Anna Ståhl, Dag Svanæs, Jakob Tholander, and Helena Tobiasson. 2018. Embracing First-Person Perspectives in Soma-Based Design. Informatics 5, 1 (2018), 8. https://doi.org/10.3390/informatics5010008

[57]

Kristina Höök, Martin Jonsson, Anna Ståhl, Jakob Tholander, Toni Robertson, Patrizia Marti, Dag Svanæs, Marianne Graves Petersen, Jodi Forlizzi, Thecla Schiphorst, Katherine Isbister, Caroline Hummels, Sietske Klooster, Lian Loke, and George Poonkhin Khut. 2016. Move to Be Moved. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (San Jose, California, USA). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 3301–3308. https://doi.org/10.1145/2851581.2856470

Digital Library

[58]

Naoto Igarashi, Kenji Suzuki, Hiroaki Kawamoto, and Yoshiyuki Sankai. 2010. bioLights: Light emitting wear for visualizing lower-limb muscle activity. In Proc. International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology, Buenos Aires, Argentina. 6393–6396. https://doi.org/10.1109/IEMBS.2010.5627306

[59]

Don Ihde. 1975. The Experience of Technology: Human-Machine Relations. Cultural Hermeneutics 2, 3 (1975), 267–279. https://doi.org/10.1177/019145377500200304

[60]

Alexander Refsum Jensenius, Victor Gonzalez Sanchez, Agata Zelechowska, and Kari Anne Vadstensvik Bjerkestrand. 2017. Exploring the Myo Controller for Sonic Microinteraction. In Proc. New Interfaces for Musical Expression (NIME).

[61]

Jennifer A. Jestley. 2011. Metaphorical and Non-Metaphorical Imagery Use in Vocal Pedagogy: An Investigation of Underlying Cognitive Organisational Constructs. Ph. D. Dissertation. University of British Columbia.

[62]

Prithvi Kantan and Sofia Dahl. 2019. Communicating Gait Performance Through Musical Energy: Towards an Intuitive Biodfeedback System for Neurorehabilitation. In Proc. International Workshop on Interactive Sonification, Stockholm, Sweden. 108–115. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3756783

[63]

Arnav Kapur, Shreyas Kapur, and Pattie Maes. 2018. AlterEgo: A Personalized Wearable Silent Speech Interface. In 23rd International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI) (Tokyo, Japan). 43–53. https://doi.org/10.1145/3172944.3172977

Digital Library

[64]

Jakob Karolus, Annika Kilian, Thomas Kosch, Albrecht Schmidt, and Paweł W. Wozniak. 2020. Hit the Thumb Jack! Using Electromyography to Augment the Piano Keyboard. In Proceedings of the 2020 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference. 429–440. https://doi.org/10.1145/3357236.3395500

Digital Library

[65]

Peter E. Keller. 2012. Mental imagery in music performance: underlying mechanisms and potential benefits. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1252, 1 (2012), 206–213. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2011.06439.x

[66]

Zeeshan O. Khokhar, Zhen G. Xiao, and Carlo Menon. 2010. Surface EMG pattern recognition for real-time control of a wrist exoskeleton. BioMedical Engineering OnLine 9, 41 (2010), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-925X-9-41

[67]

Scott R. Klemmer, Björn Hartmann, and Leila Takayama. 2006. How Bodies Matter: Five Themes for Interaction Design. In Proceedings of the 6th Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (University Park, PA, USA) (DIS ’06). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 140–149. https://doi.org/10.1145/1142405.1142429

Digital Library

[68]

George Lakoff. 1993. The Contemporary Theory of Metaphor. In Metaphor and Thought. UC Berkeley. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/4nv3j5j9

[69]

George Lakoff and Mark Johnson. 1999. The embodied mind. In Philosophy in the flesh: Embodied mind and its challenges to Western thought. New York, Basic Books, 16–41.

[70]

Marc Leman and Pieter-Jan Maes. 2015. The Role of Embodiment in the Perception of Music. Empirical Musicology Review 9, 3-4 (2015), 236–246. https://doi.org/10.18061/emr.v9i3-4.4498

[71]

Chin Guan Lim, Chin Yi Tsai, and Mike Y. Chen. 2020. MuscleSense: Exploring Weight Sensing using Wearable Surface Electromyography (sEMG). In Proc. Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction (TEI ’20), February 9– 12, 2020, Sydney, NSW, Australia. ACM, New York, NY, USA. https://doi.org/10.1145/3374920.3374943

Digital Library

[72]

Nina Loimusalo and Erkki Huovinen. July 5-9, 2016. Silent Reading and Aural Models in Pianists’ Mental Practice. In Proc. International Conference on Music Perception and Cognition (ICMPC), San Francisco, California, USA. 609–614.

[73]

Lian Loke and Claudia Núñez-Pacheco. 2018. Developing somatic sensibilities for practices of discernment in interaction design. The Senses and Society Journal 13 (2018). Issue 2.

[74]

Jennifer MacRitchie and Andrew J. Milne. 2017. Exploring the Effects of Pitch Layout on Learning a New Musical Instrument. Applied Sciences 7, 1218 (2017), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.3390/app7121218

[75]

Charles P. Martin, Alexander Refsum Jensenius, Kari Anne Vadstensvik Bjerkestrand, and Victoria Johnson. 2017. Stillness Under Tension: Performance for Myo armbands and Bela embedded computers. In MusicLab Vol.1: Biophysical Music. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1215956

[76]

Charles P. Martin, Alexander Refsum Jensenius, and Jim Torresen. 2018. Composing an Ensemble Standstill Work for Myo and Bela. In Proc. New Interfaces for Musical Expression (NIME). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1302543

[77]

Masaki Matsubara, Hideki Kadone, Masaki Iguchi, Hiroko. Terasawa, and Kenji Suzuki. 2013. The Effectiveness of Auditory Biofeedback on a Tracking Task for Ankle Joint Movements in Rehabilitation. In Proc. International Workshop on Interactive Sonification, Erlangen, Germany. 81–86.

[78]

Geoffrey S. Meltzner, J. Sroka1, J. T. Heaton, L. D. Gilmore, G. Colby, S. Roy, N. Chen, and C. J. De Luca. 2008. Speech Recognition for Vocalized and Subvocal Modes of Production using Surface EMG Signals from the Neck and Face. In INTERSPEECH 2008, 9th Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association, Brisbane, Australia, September 22-26, 2008. 2667–2670.

[79]

Maurice Merleau-Ponty. 2013. Phenomenology of perception. Routledge.

[80]

Daniel Müllensiefen, Bruno Gingras, and Lauren Stewart. 2014. The Musicality of Non-Musicians: An Index for Assessing Musical Sophistication in the General Population. PLoS ONE 9, 2 (2014), e89642. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0089642

[81]

Daniel Müllensiefen, Bruno Gingras, Lauren Stewart, and Jason Jií Musil. 2013. Goldsmiths Musical Sophistication Index (Gold-MSI) v1. 0: Technical Report and Documentation Revision 0.3. London: Goldsmiths, University of London(2013).

[82]

Carman Neustaedter and Pheobe Sengers. 2006. Autobiographical design in HCI research: designing and learning through use-it-yourself. In Proc. DIS 2012, June 11-15, 2012, Newcastle, UK. 514–523. https://doi.org/10.1145/2317956.2318034

Digital Library

[83]

Luk Nijs, Micheline Lesaffre, and Marc Leman. 2013. The Musical Instrument as a Natural Extension of the Musician. In Music and Its Instruments, H. Castellengo, M. Genevois and J.-M. Bardez (Eds.). Editions Delatour France, 467–484.

[84]

Charlotte Nordmoen, Jack Armitage, Rebecca Stewart Fabio Morreale, and Andrew McPherson. 2019. Making Sense of Sensors: Discovery Through Craft Practice With an Open-Ended Sensor Material. In 2019 on Designing Interactive Systems Conference - DIS ’19. ACM Press, San Diego, CA, USA. 135–146. https://doi.org/10.1145/3322276.3322368

Digital Library

[85]

Kristian Nymoen, Mari Romarheim Haugen, and Alexander Refsum Jensenius. 2015. MuMYO — Evaluating and Exploring the MYO Armband for Musical Interaction. In Proc. New Interfaces for Musical Expression (NIME).

Digital Library

[86]

Claudia Núñez-Pacheco and Lian Loke. 2020. Felt-sensing Archetypes: Analysing Patterns of Accessing Tacit Meaning in Design. In Proc. Chi Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’16). ACM, New York, NY, USA.

[87]

Claudia Núñez-Pacheco and Lian Loke. 2020. Getting Into Someone Else’s Soul: Communicating Embodied Experience. Journal of Digital Creativity 31 (2020). Issue 4.

[88]

Jessica O’Bryan. 2015. “We ARE our instrument!”: Forming a singer identity. Research Studies in Music Education 37, 1 (2015), 123–137. https://doi.org/10.1177/1321103X15592831

[89]

Dora Ohrenstein. 2003. Insights into training aural and kinaesthetic awareness. The National Association of Teachers of Singing Journal 60, 1(2003), 29–35.

[90]

Kotaro Okada and Shigeyuki Hirai. 2019. Interactive Sonification for Correction of Poor Sitting Posture While Working. In Proc. International Workshop on Interactive Sonification, Stockholm, Sweden. 101–107. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3743339

[91]

Claire Petitmengin. 2006. Describing one’s subjective experience in the second person: An interview method for the science of consciousness. Phenomenology and the Cognitive sciences 5, 3-4 (2006), 229–269.

[92]

Peter Q. Pfordresher. 2019. Sound an Action in Music Performance. Academic Press, London.

[93]

Søren Bolvig Poulsen and Ulla Thøgersen. 2011. Embodied design thinking: a phenomenological perspective. CoDesign 7, 1 (2011), 29–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2011.563313

[94]

Daniela Prem and Richard Parncutt. 2008. Corporality in the timbre vocabulary of professional female jazz vocalists. In M. M. Marin, M. Knoche, & R. Parncutt (Eds.), Proc. Students of Systematic Musicology (SysMus08), Graz, Austria, November 14-15, 2008. 69–71.

[95]

Courtney N. Reed and Andrew P. McPherson. 2020. Surface Electromyography for Direct Vocal Control. In Proc. New Interfaces for Musical Expression (NIME 2020) Royal Birmingham Conservatoire, Birmingham, UK. 1–6.

[96]

Courtney N. Reed and Andrew P. McPherson. 2021. Surface Electromyography for Sensing Performance Intention and Musical Imagery in Vocalists. In Proceedings of the Fifteenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction. Article 22, 11 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3430524.3440641

Digital Library

[97]

Robert S. Sackett. 1934. The influences of symbolic rehearsal upon the retention of a maze habit. Journal of General Psychology 10 (1934), 376–398. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221309.1934.9917742

[98]

Esther Salaman. 1989. Unlocking your voice. V. Gollancz, London.

[99]

Donald Schön. 1984. The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think In Action. Basic Books.

[100]

Karen Sell. 2005. The disciplines of vocal pedagogy: Towards an holistic approach. Ashgate, Burlington, VT.

[101]

Phoebe Sengers and William W. Gaver. 2006. Staying Open to Interpretation: Engaging Multiple Meanings in Design and Evaluation. In Proc. DIS 2006, June 26–28, 2006, University Park, Pennsylvania, USA. 99–108. https://doi.org/10.1145/1142405.1142422

Digital Library

[102]

Johan Sundberg. 1994. Perceptual Aspects of Singing. Journal of Voice 8, 2 (1994), 106–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0892-1997(05)80303-0

[103]

Dag Svanæs. 1997. Kinaesthetic thinking: The tacit dimension of interaction design. Computers in Human Behavior 13, 4 (1997), 443–463.

[104]

Dag Svanæs. 2001. Context-Aware Technology: A Phenomenological Perspective. Human–Computer Interaction 16, 2-4 (2001), 379–400.

[105]

Dag Svanæs. 2013. Interaction design for and with the lived body: Some implications of Merleau-Ponty’s phenomenology. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact 20 (March 2013), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1145/2442106.2442114

Digital Library

[106]

Dag Svanæs. 2019. Phenomenology through Design: A Tale of a Human Tail. In Proceedings of CHI’19 Extended Abstracts, Glasgow, Scotland, UK 19 (May 2019), 4–9. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290607.x

[107]

Dag Svanæs and Louise Barkhuus. 2020. The Designer’s Body as Resource in Design: Exploring Combinations of Point-of-View and Tense. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376430

Digital Library

[108]

Dag Svanæs and Martin Solheim. 2016. Wag Your Tail and Flap Your Ears: The Kinesthetic User Experience of Extending Your Body(CHI EA ’16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 3778–3779. https://doi.org/10.1145/2851581.2890268

Digital Library

[109]

Atau Tanaka. 2015. Intention, Effort, and Restraint: The EMG in Musical Performance. Leonardo: Transactions in Live Interfaces 43, 8 (2015), 298–299. https://doi.org/10.1162/LEON_a_01018

[110]

Atau Tanaka and R. Benjamin Knapp. 2017. Multimodal Interaction in Music Using the Electromyogram and Relative Position Sensing. In A NIME Reader: Fifteen Years of New Interfaces for Musical Expression. Springer.

[111]

Atau Tanaka and Miguel Angel Ortiz. 2017. Gestural Musical Performance with Physiological Sensors, Focusing on the Electromyogram. In The Routledge Companion to Embodied Music Interaction. Routledge.

[112]

Marian Theiss, Philipp M. Scholl, and Kristof Van Laerhoven. 2016. Predicting Grasps with a Wearable Inertial and EMG Sensing Unit for Low-Power Detection of In-Hand Objects. In Proc. Augmented Human International (AH ’16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1145/2875194.2875207

Digital Library

[113]

Evan Thompson and Francisco J. Varela. 2001. Radical embodiment: Neural dynamics and consciousness. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 5, 10 (2001), 418–425. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01750-2

[114]

William H. Trusheim. 1991. Audiation and Mental Imagery: Implications for Artistic Performance. The Quarterly 2, 1-2 (1991), 138–147.

[115]

Vasiliki Tsaknaki, Madeline Balaam, Anna Ståhl, Pedro Sanches, Charles Windlin, Pavel Karpashevich, and Kristina Höök. 2019. Teaching Soma Design. In Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (DIS) Conference 2019(2019), 1237–1249.

Digital Library

[116]

Yasunori Tsubouchi and Kenji Suzuki. 2010. BioTones: A wearable device for EMG auditory biofeedback. In Proc. International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology, Buenos Aires, Argentina. 6543–6546. https://doi.org/10.1109/IEMBS.2010.5627097

[117]

Kai Tuuri, Jaana Parvainen, and Antti Pirhonen. 2017. Who Controls Who? Embodied Control Within Human–Technology Choreographies. Interacting with Computers(2017), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1093/iwc/iww040

[118]

Francisco J. Varela. 1979. Principles of biological autonomy. Elsevier (North Holland), Amsterdam.

[119]

Francisco J. Varela, Evan Thompson, and Eleanor Rosch. 1991. The embodied mind: Cognitive science and human experience. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

[120]

Ron Wakkary, Doenja Oogjes, Henry W. J. Lin, and Sabrina Hauser. 2018. Philosophers Living with the Tilting Bowl. In Proc. CHI 2018, April 21–26, 2018, Montréal, QC, Canada. 1-12 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173668

Digital Library

[121]

Sarah E. Williams, Jennifer Cumming, Nikos Ntoumanis, Sanna M. Nordin-Bates, Richard Ramsey, and Craig Hall. 2012. Further validation and development of the Movement Imagery Questionnaire. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology 34 (2012), 621–646. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.34.5.621

[122]

Kathleen Wilson Spillane. 1989. Breath support directives used by singing teachers: A Delphi study. The National Association of Teachers of Singing Journal 45, 3(1989), 9–15.

[123]

Kieran Woodward, Eiman Kanjo, Samuel Burton, and Andreas Oikonomou. 2018. EmoEcho: A Tangible Interface to Convey and Communicate Emotions. In Proc. ACM International Joint Conference, International Symposium on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing and Wearable Computers. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 746–749. https://doi.org/10.1145/3267305.3267705

Digital Library

[124]

David J. Wright, Caroline J. Wakefield, and Dave Smith. 2014. Using PETTLEP imagery to improve music performance: A review. Musicae Scientiae 18, 4 (2014), 448–463. https://doi.org/10.1177/1029864914537668

Cited By

Staab PWilliams ARobertson MSlovak P(2024)“Can you be with that feeling?”: Extending Design Strategies for Interoceptive Awareness for the Context of Mental HealthProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3643054(1-21)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3613904.3643054

Index Terms

Examining Embodied Sensation and Perception in Singing
1. Applied computing
2. Human-centered computing
  1. Human computer interaction (HCI)

Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

Recommendations

Biosignal Augmented Embodied Performance
AM '17: Proceedings of the 12th International Audio Mostly Conference on Augmented and Participatory Sound and Music Experiences

We explore the phenomenology of embodiment based on research through design and reflection on the design of artefacts for augmenting embodied performance. We present three designs for musicians and a dancer; the designs rely on the artists' mastery ...
Three Perspectives on Embodied Learning in Virtual Reality: Opportunities for Interaction Design
CHI EA '23: Extended Abstracts of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

With the fast evolution of Virtual Reality (vr) technology, new prospects opened for embodied learning. Learners can now manipulate digital representations of abstract concepts and make sense of them through sensorimotor stimulation. However, in ...
Immersive Analytics 2.0: Spatial and Embodied Sensemaking
CHI EA '22: Extended Abstracts of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

Immersive Analytics is now a fully emerged research topic that spans several research communities, including Human-Computer Interaction, Data Visualisation, Virtual Reality and Augmented Reality. Immersive Analytics research has identified and ...

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences

TEI '22: Proceedings of the Sixteenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction

February 2022

758 pages

ISBN:9781450391474

DOI:10.1145/3490149

Copyright © 2022 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Sponsors

SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 13 February 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Short-paper
Research
Refereed limited

Conference

TEI '22

Sponsor:

SIGCHI

TEI '22: Sixteenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction

February 13 - 16, 2022

Daejeon, Republic of Korea

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 393 of 1,367 submissions, 29%

Upcoming Conference

TEI '25

Sponsor:
sigchi

Nineteenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction

March 4 - 7, 2025

Bordeaux / Talence , France

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

1
Total Citations
View Citations
262
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)55
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)10

Reflects downloads up to 21 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Staab PWilliams ARobertson MSlovak P(2024)“Can you be with that feeling?”: Extending Design Strategies for Interoceptive Awareness for the Context of Mental HealthProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3643054(1-21)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3613904.3643054

View Options

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Table of Contents