Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
research-article

Designing Technologies to Support Parent-Child Relationships: A Review of Current Findings and Suggestions for Future Directions

Published: 18 October 2021 Publication History

Abstract

Diverse fields, including CSCW, Communication, and Human Development studies, have investigated how technologies can better support parent-child relationships. While these studies are scattered across literature, little effort has been made to synthesize the findings. We conducted a review of studies that examined the factors associated with parent-child relationships that are mediated by technologies. Specifically, we synthesized previous studies based on children's age groups and different family contexts, including cohabitation. From a total of 12,942 search results from two databases, and 32 results from the hand-searching process, we conducted a full-text review of 190 articles and identified 19 suitable studies. An additional search during the revision cycle resulted in 6 more full-text reviews and 1 additional study being included in the data analysis. We analyzed challenges and facilitators in designing CSCW systems supporting parent-child relationships for families living together or apart and families with children of different developmental stages. Findings showed two common challenges, which should be addressed in technology designed to support parent-child relationships: discrepancies in expected communication between parents and child(ren) and the complex emotions of parents toward parenting caused by their busy schedules. Challenges specific to families who are living apart included consequences from being physically distant and having limited access to communication resources. The following factors commonly helped facilitate parent-child relationships: (1) reciprocity norms of the family (2) reinforcement of transparency, affection, and trust, (3) a physical proxy of each other through an object or interface design, (4) accessibility, the sophistication level of technology, and communication resources, (5) enjoyable, age-appropriate shared content among parents and children, and (6) situational awareness and routine as ways to increase parent-child relationships. Media richness and synchronicity in system design and privacy preservation without interruption facilitated parent-child relationships of families living apart. Based on the findings, we discuss opportunities for technological innovation for physically co-located families and the importance of considering children's age and developmental stages in designing technology for parent-child relationships.

Supplementary Material

DOCX File (v5cscw441aux.docx)

References

[1]
Agha, Z. et al. 2020. Towards Conducting Responsible Research with Teens and Parents regarding Online Risks. Extended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2020), 1--8.
[2]
Amato, P.R. and Booth, A. 1996. A prospective study of divorce and parent-child relationships. Journal of Marriage and the Family. (1996), 356--365.
[3]
Ames, M.G. et al. 2010. Making love in the network closet: the benefits and work of family videochat. Proceedings of the 2010 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work (2010), 145--154.
[4]
Ar?m, R.G. et al. 2010. A domain-specific approach to adolescent reporting of parental control. Journal of Adolescence. 33, 3 (2010), 355--366.
[5]
Ar?m, R.G. et al. 2011. An examination of the reciprocal relationships between adolescents' aggressive behaviors and their perceptions of parental nurturance. Journal of Youth and Adolescence. 40, 2 (2011), 207--220.
[6]
Ar?m, R.G. and Shapka, J.D. 2008. The impact of pubertal timing and parental control on adolescent problem behaviors. Journal of Youth and Adolescence. 37, 4 (2008), 445--455.
[7]
Badillo-Urquiola, K. et al. 2020. Beyond parental control: designing adolescent online safety apps using value sensitive design. Journal of adolescent research. 35, 1 (2020), 147--175.
[8]
Barnes, H.L. and Olson, D.H. 1985. Parent-adolescent communication and the circumplex model. Child development. (1985), 438--447.
[9]
Beckman, C.M. and Mazmanian, M. 2020. Dreams of the overworked: Living, working, and parenting in the digital age. Stanford University Press.
[10]
Bedford, T. How to use technology to connect with family on Christmas Day 2020.
[11]
Beneteau, E. et al. 2020. Assumptions Checked: How Families Learn About and Use the Echo Dot. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies. 4, 1 (2020), 1--23.
[12]
Beneteau, E. et al. 2020. Parenting with Alexa: Exploring the Introduction of Smart Speakers on Family Dynamics. Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2020), 1--13.
[13]
Bentley, F.R. and Chowduhry, S.K. 2010. Serendipitous family stories: Using findings from a study on family communication to share family history. UbiComp'10 - Proceedings of the 2010 ACM Conference on Ubiquitous Computing. (2010), 359--360.
[14]
Bergen, D. et al. 2010. Effects of infant-parent play with a technology-enhanced toy: Affordance-related actions and communicative interactions. Journal of Research in Childhood Education. 24, 1 (Jan. 2010), 1--17.
[15]
Beyer, H. and Holtzblatt, K. 1997. Contextual design: defining customer-centered systems. Elsevier.
[16]
Black, B.P. et al. 2009. Life course theory as a framework to examine becoming a mother of a medically fragile preterm infant. Research in Nursing & Health. 32, 1 (Feb. 2009), 38--49.
[17]
Blackwell, L. et al. 2016. Managing expectations: Technology tensions among parents and teens. Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, CSCW. 27, (2016), 1390--1401.
[18]
Brown, B. et al. 2007. Locating family values: A field trial of the Whereabouts Clock. International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing (2007), 354--371.
[19]
Bruun, A. et al. 2020. Exploring the Non-Use of Mobile Devices in Families through Provocative Design. Proceedings of the 2020 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference (2020), 813--826.
[20]
Chen, Y.-Y. et al. 2019. Understanding Parents' Perspectives on Mealtime Technology. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies. 3, 1 (2019), 1--19.
[21]
Choe, E.K. et al. 2015. SleepTight: Low-burden, self-monitoring technology for capturing and reflecting on sleep behaviors. UbiComp 2015 - Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing. (2015), 121--132.
[22]
Clark, K.E. and Ladd, G.W. 2000. Connectedness and autonomy support in parent--child relationships: Links to children's socioemotional orientation and peer relationships. Developmental psychology. 36, 4 (2000), 485.
[23]
Cornejo, R. et al. 2013. Enriching in-person encounters through social media: A study on family connectedness for the elderly. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies. 71, 9 (2013), 889--899.
[24]
Correa, T. 2015. The power of youth: How the bottom-up technology transmission from children to parents is related to digital (in) equality. International Journal of Communication. 9, (2015), 24.
[25]
Craane, B. et al. 2012. Methodological quality of a systematic review on physical therapy for temporomandibular disorders: influence of hand search and quality scales. Clinical oral investigations. 16, 1 (2012), 295--303.
[26]
Cranor, L.F. et al. 2014. Parents' and teens' perspectives on privacy in a technology-filled world. 10th Symposium On Usable Privacy and Security ({SOUPS} 2014) (2014), 19--35.
[27]
Dahinten, V.S. et al. 2007. Adolescent children of adolescent mothers: The impact of family functioning on trajectories of development. Journal of Youth and Adolescence. 36, 2 (2007), 195--212.
[28]
Dalsgaard, T. et al. 2006. Mediated intimacy in families: Understanding the relation between children and parents. Proceeding of the 2006 Conference on Interaction Design and Children, IDC '06. 2006, (2006), 145--152.
[29]
Davidoff, S. et al. 2010. How routine learners can support family coordination. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2010), 2461--2470.
[30]
Davis, K. et al. 2019. ? Everything's the Phone" Understanding the Phone's Supercharged Role in Parent-Teen Relationships. Proceedings of the 2019 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems (2019), 1--14.
[31]
Demick, J. 2002. Stages of parental development. Handbook of parenting. 3, (2002), 389--413.
[32]
Desjardins, A. et al. 2015. Investigating genres and perspectives in HCI research on the home. Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings. 2015-April, (2015), 3073--3082.
[33]
ELDER, G.H. 1978. Family History and the Life Course. Transitions. (1978), 17--64.
[34]
Emery, R.E. 1999. Marriage, divorce, and children's adjustment. Sage Publications.
[35]
Erickson, L.B. et al. 2016. The boundaries between: Parental involvement in a teen's online world. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 67, 6 (2016), 1384--1403.
[36]
Fails, J. et al. 2012. Technology for today's family. CHI'12 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 2739--2742.
[37]
Follmer, S. et al. 2010. Video play: playful interactions in video conferencing for long-distance families with young children. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children (2010), 49--58.
[38]
Garg, R. and Sengupta, S. 2019. ? When you can do it, why can't I?": Racial and Socioeconomic Differences in Family Technology Use and Non-Use. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction. 3, CSCW (2019), 1--22.
[39]
Garg, R. and Sengupta, S. 2020. Conversational Technologies for In-home Learning: Using Co-Design to Understand Children's and Parents' Perspectives. Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2020), 1--13.
[40]
Ghosh, A.K. et al. 2017. Examining parents' technical mediation of teens' mobile devices. Companion of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (2017), 179--182.
[41]
Ghosh, A.K. et al. 2018. Examining the Effects of Parenting Styles on Offline and Online Adolescent Peer Problems. Proceedings of the 2018 ACM Conference on Supporting Groupwork (2018), 150--153.
[42]
Ghosh, A.K. et al. 2018. Safety vs. surveillance: what children have to say about mobile apps for parental control. Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2018), 124.
[43]
Golsteijn, C. and Van Den Hoven, E. 2013. Facilitating parent-teenager communication through interactive photo cubes. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing. 17, 2 (2013), 273--286.
[44]
Gray, S. et al. 2019. trove: A digitally enhanced memory box for looked after and adopted children. Proceedings of the 18th ACM International Conference on Interaction Design and Children (2019), 458--463.
[45]
Grotevant, H.D. and Cooper, C.R. 1986. Individuation in family relationships. Human development. 29, 2 (1986), 82--100.
[46]
Harper, R. 2011. The connected home: The future of domestic life. Springer.
[47]
Hassenzahl, M. et al. 2012. All you need is love: Current strategies of mediating intimate relationships through technology. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI). 19, 4 (2012), 1--19.
[48]
Healthy Parent-Child Relationships: https://www.hhs.gov/ash/oah/adolescent-development/healthy-relationships/parents-child/index.html. Accessed: 2020-05--31.
[49]
Heshmat, Y. et al. 2020. FamilyStories: Asynchronous Audio Storytelling for Family Members Across Time Zones. Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2020), 1--14.
[50]
Hines, A.M. 1997. Divorce-related transitions, adolescent development, and the role of the parent-child relationship: A review of the literature. Journal of Marriage and the Family. (1997), 375--388.
[51]
Hiniker, A. et al. 2016. Not at the Dinner Table?: Parents ' and Children ' s Perspectives on Family Technology Rules. (2016), 1376--1389.
[52]
Hiniker, A. et al. 2016. Not at the dinner table: Parents' and children's perspectives on family technology rules. Proceedings of the 19th ACM conference on computer-supported cooperative work & social computing (2016), 1376--1389.
[53]
Hiniker, A. et al. 2017. Plan & play: supporting intentional media use in early childhood. Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Interaction Design and Children (2017), 85--95.
[54]
Hiniker, A. et al. 2016. Screen time tantrums: how families manage screen media experiences for toddlers and preschoolers. Proceedings of the 2016 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems (2016), 648--660.
[55]
Hiniker, A. et al. 2015. Texting while parenting: How adults use mobile phones while caring for children at the playground. Proceedings of the 33rd annual ACM conference on human factors in computing systems (2015), 727--736.
[56]
Hiniker, A. and Lee, B. 2017. Plan & Play?: Supporting Intentional Media Use in Early Childhood. (2017).
[57]
Iga, N. et al. 2017. Improving relationships between parents and children in shopping malls by using a digital treasure hunting game. CHI PLAY 2017 Extended Abstracts - Extended Abstracts Publication of the Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play. (2017), 261--267.
[58]
Isola, S. and Fails, J.A. 2012. Family and design in the IDC and CHI communities. Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children (2012), 40--49.
[59]
Jones, J. 2016. Designing Social Memory Artifacts in a Smart Home. Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Supporting Group Work (2016), 473--477.
[60]
Jones, J. and Ackerman, M.S. 2018. Co-constructing family memory: Understanding the intergenerational practices of passing on family stories. Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings. 2018-April, (2018), 1--13.
[61]
Jones, J. and Merritt, D. 2017. KidKeeper?: Design for capturing audio mementos of everyday life for parents of young children. (2017).
[62]
Judge, T.K. et al. 2011. Family Portals: Connecting families through a multifamily media space. Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings. (2011), 1205--1214.
[63]
Katz, V.S. et al. 2018. Connecting with technology in lower-income US families. New Media & Society. 20, 7 (2018), 2509--2533.
[64]
Kay, M. et al. 2012. Lullaby: A capture & access system for understanding the sleep environment. UbiComp'12 - Proceedings of the 2012 ACM Conference on Ubiquitous Computing. (2012), 226--235.
[65]
Kazakos, K. et al. 2013. Exploring the Diversity of Families: Designing Technologies for the Contemporary Family Life. Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings. 2013-April, (2013), 3255--3258.
[66]
Kazakos, K. et al. 2013. Revisiting the relationship between Reunion and technology-mediated separation in periodically transitioning families. Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, CSCW. (2013), 1157--1167.
[67]
Kazakos, K. 2013. Understanding the role of technology in parent-child Reunion. Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, CSCW. (2013), 61--64.
[68]
Kim, A.S. and Davis, K. 2017. Tweens' perspectives on their parents' media-related attitudes and rules: An exploratory study in the US. Journal of Children and Media. 11, 3 (Jul. 2017), 358--366.
[69]
Kirk, D.S. et al. 2010. Home video communication: mediating'closeness'. Proceedings of the 2010 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work (2010), 135--144.
[70]
Kirk, D.S. et al. 2016. Ritual machines I & II: Making technology at home. Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings. (2016), 2474--2486.
[71]
Kirk, D.S. and Sellen, A. 2010. On human remains: Values and practice in the home archiving of cherished objects. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction. 17, 3 (Jul. 2010), 1--43.
[72]
Ko, M. et al. 2015. FamiLync: facilitating participatory parental mediation of adolescents' smartphone use. Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing (2015), 867--878.
[73]
Laursen, B. and Collins, W.A. 2009. Parent-child relationships during adolescence. Handbook of adolescent psychology. 2, (2009).
[74]
Law, D.M. et al. 2010. To control or not to control? Parenting behaviours and adolescent online aggression. Computers in Human Behavior. 26, 6 (Nov. 2010), 1651--1656.
[75]
Lee, J. et al. 2017. Home talky: SNS service for sustainable communication for all the family members across every generation. Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings. Part F1276, (2017), 1809--1815.
[76]
Liew, C.C. 2017. CUPA: Cube pal for developing children's emotional intelligence and parent-child relationship. Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings. Part F1276, (2017), 124--129.
[77]
Ling, R. and Bertel, T. 2013. Mobile communication culture among children and adolescents. The Routledge international handbook of children, adolescents and media. (2013), 127--133.
[78]
Luthar, S.S. and Ciciolla, L. 2016. What it feels like to be a mother: Variations by children's developmental stages. Developmental Psychology. 52, 1 (2016), 143.
[79]
Markopoulos, P. et al. 2004. Keeping in touch with the family: home and away with the ASTRA awareness system. CHI'04 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems (2004), 1351--1354.
[80]
Mazmanian, M. and Lanette, S. 2017. ? Okay, One More Episode" An Ethnography of Parenting in the Digital Age. Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (2017), 2273--2286.
[81]
Merritt, D. et al. 2017. Kurator: Using the crowd to help families with personal curation tasks. Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, CSCW. Ml (2017), 1835--1849.
[82]
Modlitba, P. and Schmandt, C. 2008. Globetoddler - Designing for remote interaction between preschoolers and their traveling parents. Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings. (2008), 3057--3062.
[83]
Moher, D. et al. 2009. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Annals of internal medicine. 151, 4 (2009), 264--269.
[84]
Nag, W. et al. 2016. Keep out! Join in! Cross-generation communication on the mobile internet in Norway. Journal of Children and Media. 10, 4 (2016), 411--425.
[85]
Neustaedter, C. et al. 2015. Sharing domestic life through long-term video connections. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction. 22, 1 (2015), 1--29.
[86]
Neustaedter, C. et al. 2009. The calendar is crucial: Coordination and awareness through the family calendar. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI). 16, 1 (2009), 1--48.
[87]
Neustaedter, C. and Bernheim Brush, A.J. 2006. " LINC-ing" the family: the participatory design of an inkable family calendar. Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in computing systems (2006), 141--150.
[88]
Neustaedter, C. and Greenberg, S. 2012. Intimacy in long-distance relationships over video chat. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2012), 753--762.
[89]
Nikken, P. and Jansz, J. 2006. Parental mediation of children's videogame playing: A comparison of the reports by parents and children. Learning, media and technology. 31, 2 (2006), 181--202.
[90]
Noar, S.M. et al. 2020. Does perceived message effectiveness predict the actual effectiveness of tobacco education messages? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Health communication. 35, 2 (2020), 148--157.
[91]
Nomaguchi, K. and Milkie, M.A. 2020. Parenthood and well?being: A decade in review. Journal of Marriage and Family. 82, 1 (2020), 198--223.
[92]
Nomaguchi, K.M. 2012. Parenthood and psychological well-being: Clarifying the role of child age and parent--child relationship quality. Social science research. 41, 2 (2012), 489--498.
[93]
O'Hara, K. et al. 2005. TxtBoard: from text-to-person to text-to-home. CHI'05 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems (2005), 1705--1708.
[94]
Odom, W. et al. 2010. Designing for dynamic family structures: Divorced families and interactive systems. DIS 2010 - Proceedings of the 8th ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems. (2010), 151--160.
[95]
Overbeek, G. et al. 2007. Parent-child relationships, partner relationships, and emotional adjustment: A birth-to-maturity prospective study. Developmental Psychology. 43, 2 (2007), 429.
[96]
Pan, L. et al. 2013. An exploration on long-distance communications between left-behind children and their parents in China. Proceedings of the 2013 conference on Computer supported cooperative work (2013), 1147--1156.
[97]
Pearce, L.D. et al. 2018. The increasing diversity and complexity of family structures for adolescents. Journal of Research on Adolescence. 28, 3 (2018), 591--608.
[98]
Pepping, J. et al. 2020. Motiis: Fostering Parents' Awareness of their Adolescents Emotional Experiences during Gaming. Proceedings of the 11th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Shaping Experiences, Shaping Society (2020), 1--11.
[99]
Petrelli, D. and Whittaker, S. 2010. Family memories in the home: Contrasting physical and digital mementos. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing. 14, 2 (2010), 153--169.
[100]
Piaget, J. 1976. Piaget's theory. Piaget and his school. Springer. 11--23.
[101]
Plaisant, C. et al. 2006. Shared family calendars: Promoting symmetry and accessibility. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction. 13, 3 (2006), 313--346.
[102]
Prey, J.E. et al. 2014. Patient engagement in the inpatient setting: A systematic review. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. 21, 4 (2014), 742--750.
[103]
Racz, S.J. et al. 2017. Parenting in the digital age: Urban black youth's perceptions about technology-based communication with parents. Journal of Family Studies. 23, 2 (May 2017), 198--214.
[104]
Raffle, H. et al. 2010. Family story play: reading with young children (and elmo) over a distance. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2010), 1583--1592.
[105]
Raffle, H. et al. 2011. Hello, is grandma there? let's read! StoryVisit: family video chat and connected e-books. Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (2011), 1195--1204.
[106]
Rheu, M. et al. 2021. Systematic review: Trust-building factors and implications for conversational agent design. International Journal of Human--Computer Interaction. 37, 1 (2021), 81--96.
[107]
Rodriguez, S.R. 2014. ?We'll only see parts of each other's lives:" The role of mundane talk in maintaining nonresidential parent--child relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships. 31, 8 (Dec. 2014), 1134--1152.
[108]
Ryokai, K. et al. 2018. Capturing, representing, and interacting with laughter. Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2018), 1--12.
[109]
Saksono, H. et al. 2015. Spaceship Launch?: Designing a Collaborati ve Exergame for Families. (2015).
[110]
Saksono, H. et al. 2020. Storywell: Designing for Family Fitness App Motivation by Using Social Rewards and Reflection. CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems Proceedings (CHI 2020). (2020), 1--13.
[111]
Saksono, H. and Parker, A.G. 2017. Reflective informatics through family storytelling: Self-discovering physical activity predictors. Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings. 2017-May, (2017), 5232--5244.
[112]
Scharp, K.M. and Thomas, L.J. 2016. Family ?bonds": Making meaning of parent--child relationships in estrangement narratives. Journal of Family Communication. 16, 1 (2016), 32--50.
[113]
Schermerhorn, A.C. and Mark Cummings, E. 2008. Transactional family dynamics: A new framework for conceptualizing family influence processes. Advances in Child Development and Behavior. 36, (2008), 187--250.
[114]
Schroeder, V.M. and Kelley, M.L. 2010. Family environment and parent?child relationships as related to executive functioning in children. Early child development and care. 180, 10 (2010), 1285--1298.
[115]
Sciuto, A. et al. 2018. Hey Alexa, What's Up?: A mixed-methods studies of in-home conversational agent usage. Proceedings of the 2018 Designing Interactive Systems Conference (2018), 857--868.
[116]
Segrin, C. and Flora, J. 2011. Family communication. Routledge.
[117]
Sellen, A. et al. 2006. HomeNote: supporting situated messaging in the home. Proceedings of the 2006 20th anniversary conference on Computer supported cooperative work (2006), 383--392.
[118]
Seltzer, J.A. 1991. Relationships between fathers and children who live apart: The father's role after separation. Journal of Marriage and the Family. (1991), 79--101.
[119]
Seppen, B.F. et al. 2020. Asynchronous mhealth interventions in rheumatoid arthritis: Systematic scoping review. JMIR mHealth and uHealth. 8, 11 (2020), e19260.
[120]
Shapka, J.D. and Law, D.M. 2013. Does one size fit all? Ethnic differences in parenting behaviors and motivations for adolescent engagement in cyberbullying. Journal of youth and adolescence. 42, 5 (2013), 723--738.
[121]
Smock, P.J. and Schwartz, C.R. 2020. The demography of families: A review of patterns and change. Journal of Marriage and Family. 82, 1 (2020), 9--34.
[122]
Sobel, K. et al. 2017. It wasn't really about the PokéMon: parents' perspectives on a location-based mobile game. Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2017), 1483--1496.
[123]
Sonne, T. et al. 2016. Changing family practices with assistive technology: MOBERO improves morning and bedtime routines for children with ADHD. Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings. (2016), 152--164.
[124]
Stevens, M.M. et al. 2003. Getting into the Living Memory Box: Family archives & holistic design. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing. 7, 3--4 (2003), 210--216.
[125]
Strauss, A. and Corbin, J. 1994. Grounded theory methodology. Handbook of qualitative research. 17, (1994), 273--285.
[126]
Sun, Y. et al. 2016. e-Seesaw: A tangible, ludic, parent-child, awareness system. Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings. 07--12-May-, (2016), 1821--1827.
[127]
Watt, D. and White, J.M. 1999. Computers and the family life: A family development perspective. Journal of Comparative Family Studies. 30, 1 (1999), 1--15.
[128]
West, D. et al. 2007. MEMENTO: a digital-physical scrapbook for memory sharing. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing. 11, 4 (2007), 313--328.
[129]
Wisniewski, P. et al. 2017. Parental Control vs. Teen Self-Regulation: Is there a middle ground for mobile online safety? Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (2017), 51--69.
[130]
Wisniewski, P. et al. 2017. Parents just don't understand: Why teens don't talk to parents about their online risk experiences. Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (2017), 523--540.
[131]
Wong-Villacres, M. and Bardzell, S. 2011. Technology-mediated parent-child intimacy: Designing for ecuadorian families separated by migration. Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings. (2011), 2215--2220.
[132]
Yarosh, S. 2015. Designing technology to empower children to communicate with non-residential parents. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction. 3--4, (2015), 1--13.
[133]
Yarosh, S. et al. 2009. Developing a media space for remote synchronous parent-child interaction. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children (2009), 97--105.
[134]
Yarosh, S. et al. 2009. Supporting parent-child communication in divorced families. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies. 67, 2 (Feb. 2009), 192--203.
[135]
Yarosh, S. and Abowd, G.D. 2011. Mediated parent-child contact in work-separated families. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2011), 1185--1194.
[136]
Yeom, G.R. et al. 2017. Fam-On: Family shared time tracker to improve their emotional bond. Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services, MobileHCI 2017. (2017).

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Unfulfilled Promises of Child Safety and Privacy: Portrayals and Use of Children in Smart Home MarketingProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36374228:CSCW1(1-29)Online publication date: 26-Apr-2024
  • (2024)"They Don't Come With a Handbook": Exploring Design Opportunities for Supporting Parent-Child Interaction around Emotions in the Family ContextProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36374098:CSCW1(1-33)Online publication date: 26-Apr-2024
  • (2024)Stress Diffuser: A Biofeedback Agent for Stress Management in Children During Homework with Parent InvolvementProceedings of the 23rd Annual ACM Interaction Design and Children Conference10.1145/3628516.3659378(701-705)Online publication date: 17-Jun-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Designing Technologies to Support Parent-Child Relationships: A Review of Current Findings and Suggestions for Future Directions
        Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

        Information & Contributors

        Information

        Published In

        cover image Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
        Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction  Volume 5, Issue CSCW2
        CSCW2
        October 2021
        5376 pages
        EISSN:2573-0142
        DOI:10.1145/3493286
        Issue’s Table of Contents
        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        Published: 18 October 2021
        Published in PACMHCI Volume 5, Issue CSCW2

        Permissions

        Request permissions for this article.

        Check for updates

        Author Tags

        1. design
        2. family communication
        3. family relationships
        4. parent-child communication
        5. parent-child interaction
        6. parent-child relationships
        7. technology

        Qualifiers

        • Research-article

        Funding Sources

        • NSF IIS

        Contributors

        Other Metrics

        Bibliometrics & Citations

        Bibliometrics

        Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)410
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)58
        Reflects downloads up to 10 Nov 2024

        Other Metrics

        Citations

        Cited By

        View all
        • (2024)Unfulfilled Promises of Child Safety and Privacy: Portrayals and Use of Children in Smart Home MarketingProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36374228:CSCW1(1-29)Online publication date: 26-Apr-2024
        • (2024)"They Don't Come With a Handbook": Exploring Design Opportunities for Supporting Parent-Child Interaction around Emotions in the Family ContextProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36374098:CSCW1(1-33)Online publication date: 26-Apr-2024
        • (2024)Stress Diffuser: A Biofeedback Agent for Stress Management in Children During Homework with Parent InvolvementProceedings of the 23rd Annual ACM Interaction Design and Children Conference10.1145/3628516.3659378(701-705)Online publication date: 17-Jun-2024
        • (2024)ChiParCo and ParChiCo: Connecting Children and Parents Remotely With Tailored Tangible Communication ToolsProceedings of the 23rd Annual ACM Interaction Design and Children Conference10.1145/3628516.3655803(424-435)Online publication date: 17-Jun-2024
        • (2024)Methods for Family-Centered Design: Bridging the Gap Between Research and PracticeExtended Abstracts of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613905.3636290(1-6)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
        • (2024)"When He Feels Cold, He Goes to the Seahorse"—Blending Generative AI into Multimaterial Storymaking for Family Expressive Arts TherapyProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642852(1-21)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
        • (2024)Supporting Parent-Child Interactions in Child Riding: Exploring Design Opportunities for Digital Interaction StrategiesHCI International 2024 Posters10.1007/978-3-031-61932-8_13(102-111)Online publication date: 1-Jun-2024
        • (2023)Exploring the Opportunities of AR for Enriching Storytelling with Family Photos between Grandparents and GrandchildrenProceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies10.1145/36109037:3(1-26)Online publication date: 27-Sep-2023
        • (2023)Bedtime Pals: A Deployment Study of Sleep Management Technology for Families with Young ChildrenProceedings of the 2023 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3563657.3596068(1610-1629)Online publication date: 10-Jul-2023
        • (2023)“It’s not just for the Past but it’s for the Here and Now”: Gift-Giver Perspectives on the Memory Machine to Gift Digital MemoriesProceedings of the 2023 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3563657.3595962(987-1001)Online publication date: 10-Jul-2023
        • Show More Cited By

        View Options

        Get Access

        Login options

        Full Access

        View options

        PDF

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader

        Media

        Figures

        Other

        Tables

        Share

        Share

        Share this Publication link

        Share on social media