research-article

Mediating Community-AI Interaction through Situated Explanation: The Case of AI-Led Moderation

Authors:

Xinning GuiAuthors Info & Claims

Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Volume 4, Issue CSCW2

Article No.: 102, Pages 1 - 27

https://doi.org/10.1145/3415173

Published: 15 October 2020 Publication History

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) has become prevalent in our everyday technologies and impacts both individuals and communities. The explainable AI (XAI) scholarship has explored the philosophical nature of explanation and technical explanations, which are usually driven by experts in lab settings and can be challenging for laypersons to understand. In addition, existing XAI research tends to focus on the individual level. Little is known about how people understand and explain AI-led decisions in the community context. Drawing from XAI and activity theory, a foundational HCI theory, we theorize how explanation is situated in a community's shared values, norms, knowledge, and practices, and how situated explanation mediates community-AI interaction. We then present a case study of AI-led moderation, where community members collectively develop explanations of AI-led decisions, most of which are automated punishments. Lastly, we discuss the implications of this framework at the intersection of CSCW, HCI, and XAI.

References

[1]

Amina Adadi and Mohammed Berrada. 2018. Peeking Inside the Black-Box: A Survey on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI). IEEE Access 6, (September 2018), 52138--52160.

[2]

Kimberley R. Allison, Kay Bussey, and Naomi Sweller. 2019. 'I'm going to hell for laughing at this': Norms, Humour, and the Neutralisation of Aggression in Online Communities. Proc. ACM Human-Computer Interact. 3, CSCW (November 2019), 1--25.

Digital Library

[3]

Mike Ananny and Kate Crawford. 2018. Seeing without knowing: Limitations of the transparency ideal and its application to algorithmic accountability. New Media Soc. 20, 3 (March 2018), 973--989.

[4]

Zahra Ashktorab, Mohit Jain, Q. Vera Liao, and Justin D. Weisz. 2019. Resilient ChatBots: Repair Strategy Preferences for Conversational Breakdowns. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '19, 1--12.

[5]

Olav W. Bertelsen and Susanne Bødker. 2003. Activity Theory. In HCI models, theories, and frameworks: Towards an interdisciplinary science. Morgan Kauffman Publishers, 291--324.

[6]

Lindsay Blackwell, Jill Dimond, Sarita Schoenebeck, and Cliff Lampe. 2017. Classification and Its Consequences for Online Harassment: Design Insights from HeartMob. Proc. ACM Human-Computer Interact. 1, CSCW (2017), 24.

Digital Library

[7]

Susanne Bødker. 1996. Applying activity theory to video analysis: how to make sense of video data in human-computer interaction. In Context and consciousness: activity theory and human-computer interactiond consciousness. MIT Press, 147--174. Retrieved April 5, 2017 from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=223833

[8]

Susan L. Bryant, Andrea Forte, and Amy Bruckman. 2005. Becoming Wikipedian: Transformation of participation in a collaborative online encyclopedia. In Proceedings of the International ACM SIGGROUP Conference on Supporting Group Work, 1--10.

Digital Library

[9]

Jenna Burrell. 2016. How the machine 'thinks': Understanding opacity in machine learning algorithms. Big Data Soc. 3, 1 (January 2016), 205395171562251.

[10]

Brian Butler, Elisabeth Joyce, and Jacqueline Pike. 2008. Don't look now, but we've created a bureaucracy: the nature and roles of policies and rules in wikipedia. In Proceeding of the twenty-sixth annual CHI conference on Human factors in computing systems - CHI '08, 1101--1110.

[11]

Colin Campbell. 2014. How Riot Games encourages sportsmanship in League of Legends. polygon. Retrieved from https://www.polygon.com/2014/3/20/5529784/how-riot-games-encourages-sportsmanship-in-league-of-legends

[12]

Heather Canary. 2010. Constructing Policy Knowledge: Contradictions, Communication, and Knowledge Frames. Commun. Monogr. 77, 2 (June 2010), 181--206.

[13]

Eshwar Chandrasekharan, Umashanthi Pavalanathan, Anirudh Srinivasan, Adam Glynn, Jacob Eisenstein, and Eric Gilbert. 2017. You Can't Stay Here: The Efficacy of Reddit's 2015 Ban Examined Through Hate Speech. Proc. ACM Human-Computer Interact. 1, CSCW (2017), 31.

Digital Library

[14]

Eshwar Chandrasekharan, Mattia Samory, Shagun Jhaver, Hunter Charvat, Amy Bruckman, Cliff Lampe, Jacob Eisenstein, and Eric Gilbert. 2018. The Internet's hidden rules: An empirical study of Reddit norm violations at micro, meso, and macro scales. Proc. ACM Human-Computer Interact. 2, CSCW (November 2018).

Digital Library

[15]

Hao-Fei Cheng, Ruotong Wang, Zheng Zhang, Fiona O'Connell, Terrance Gray, F. Maxwell Harper, and Haiyi Zhu. 2019. Explaining Decision-Making Algorithms through UI: Strategies to Help Non-Expert Stakeholders. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '19, 1--12.

Digital Library

[16]

Torkil Clemmensen, Victor Kaptelinin, and Bonnie Nardi. 2016. Making HCI theory work: an analysis of the use of activity theory in HCI research. Behav. Inf. Technol. 35, 8 (August 2016), 608--627.

Digital Library

[17]

Laura Dabbish, Colleen Stuart, Jason Tsay, and Jim Herbsleb. 2012. Social coding in GitHub: transparency and collaboration in an open software repository. In Proceedings of the ACM 2012 conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work - CSCW '12, 1277--1286.

Digital Library

[18]

Michael A. DeVito, Jeremy Birnholtz, Jeffery T. Hancock, Megan French, and Sunny Liu. 2018. How People Form Folk Theories of Social Media Feeds and What it Means for How We Study Self-Presentation. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '18, 1--12.

Digital Library

[19]

Nicholas Diakopoulos. 2015. Algorithmic Accountability: Journalistic investigation of computational power structures. Digit. Journal. 3, 3 (May 2015), 398--415.

[20]

Donath, Marc A. Smith, and Peter Kollock. 1999. Communities in Cyberspace. Routledge, London & New York. Retrieved from http://books.google.com/books?id=harO_jeoyUwC

[21]

Malin Eiband, Hanna Schneider, Mark Bilandzic, Julian Fazekas-Con, Mareike Haug, and Heinrich Hussmann. 2018. Bringing Transparency Design into Practice. In Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Human Information Interaction&Retrieval - IUI 18, 211--223.

Digital Library

[22]

1990. Learning, working and imagining?: twelve studies in activity theory. Orienta-Konsultit Oy.

[23]

Yrjö Engeström. 2000. Activity Theory and the Social Construction of Knowledge: A Story of Four Umpires. Organization 7, 2 (2000), 301--310.

[24]

Yrjö Engeström. 2000. Activity theory as a framework for analyzing and redesigning work. Ergonomics 43, 7 (July 2000), 960--74.

[25]

Learning by Expanding. Cambridge University Press.

[26]

Motahhare Eslami, Karrie Karahalios, Christian Sandvig, Kristen Vaccaro, Aimee Rickman, Kevin Hamilton, and Alex Kirlik. 2016. First I "like" it, then I hide it: Folk Theories of Social Feeds. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '16, 2371--2382.

Digital Library

[27]

Motahhare Eslami, Aimee Rickman, Kristen Vaccaro, Amirhossein Aleyasen, Andy Vuong, Karrie Karahalios, Kevin Hamilton, and Christian Sandvig. 2015. 'I always assumed that I wasn't really that close to [her]?: Reasoning about Invisible Algorithms in News Feeds. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '15, 153--162.

Digital Library

[28]

Motahhare Eslami, Kristen Vaccaro, Min Kyung Lee, Amit Elazari Bar On, Eric Gilbert, and Karrie Karahalios. 2019. User Attitudes towards Algorithmic Opacity and Transparency in Online Reviewing Platforms. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '19, 1--14.

Digital Library

[29]

Jenny Fan and Amy X. Zhang. 2020. Digital Juries: A Civics-Oriented Approach to Platform Governance. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1--14.

[30]

Ryan Faulkner, Steven Walling, and Maryana Pinchuk. 2012. Etiquette in Wikipedia: weening new editors into productive ones. In WikiSym 2012 Conference Proceedings - 8th Annual International Symposium on Wikis and Open Collaboration (WikiSym '12), 5:1--5:4.

Digital Library

[31]

Jessica L. Feuston, Alex S. Taylor, and Anne Marie Piper. 2020. Conformity of Eating Disorders through Content Moderation. Proc. ACM Human-Computer Interact. 4, CSCW1 (May 2020), 1--28.

Digital Library

[32]

Nick Fox and Chris Roberts. 1999. Gps in Cyberspace: The Sociology of a 'Virtual Community.' Sociol. Rev. 47, 4 (November 1999), 643--671.

[33]

Riot Games. 2020. SAYING FAREWELL TO BOARDS. LeagueofLegends.com. Retrieved from https://na.leagueoflegends.com/en-us/news/community/saying-farewell-to-boards/

[34]

Ysabel Gerrard. 2018. Beyond the hashtag: Circumventing content moderation on social media. New Media Soc. 20, 12 (December 2018), 4492--4511.

[35]

Tarleton Gillespie. 2018. Custodians of the internet?: platforms, content moderation, and the hidden decisions that shape social media. Yale University Press.

[36]

Barney G. Glaser and Anselm L. Strauss. 2009. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Transaction Publishers.

[37]

Robert Gorwa, Reuben Binns, and Christian Katzenbach. 2020. Algorithmic content moderation: Technical and political challenges in the automation of platform governance. Big Data Soc. 7, 1 (January 2020), 205395171989794.

[38]

Nathan Grayson. 2014. Stats Suggest Most League Of Legends Players Actually Aren't Jerks. kotaku. Retrieved from https://kotaku.com/stats-suggest-most-league-of-legends-players-actually-a-1658605394

[39]

David Gunning. 2017. Explainable artificial intelligence (xai).

[40]

Aaron Halfaker, R. Stuart Geiger, Jonathan T. Morgan, and John Riedl. 2013. The Rise and Decline of an Open Collaboration System: How Wikipedia's Reaction to Popularity Is Causing Its Decline. Am. Behav. Sci. 57, 5 (May 2013), 664--688.

[41]

Aaron Halfaker, Aniket Kittur, and John Riedl. 2011. Don'T Bite the Newbies: How Reverts Affect the Quantity and Quality of Wikipedia Work. In (WikiSym '11), 163--172.

Digital Library

[42]

Melissa Hellmann. 2019. Magnolia residents? AI-powered surveillance camera tracks people, cars at entrance to neighborhood, experts caution bias. The Seattle Times. Retrieved from https://www.seattletimes.com/business/technology/magnolia-residents-ai-powered-surveillance-camera-tracks-people-cars-at-entrance-to-neighborhood-experts-caution-bias/

[43]

Denis J. Hilton. 1990. Conversational processes and causal explanation. Psychol. Bull. 107, 1 (1990), 65--81.

[44]

Kenneth Holstein, Jennifer Wortman Vaughan, Hal Daumé, Miro Dudik, and Hanna Wallach. 2019. Improving Fairness in Machine Learning Systems: What Do Industry Practitioners Need? In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '19, 1--16.

Digital Library

[45]

Eaman Jahani, Peter M. Krafft, Yoshihiko Suhara, Esteban Moro, and Alex Sandy Pentland. 2018. ScamCoins, S*** Posters, and the Search for the Next Bitcoin TM. Proc. ACM Human-Computer Interact. 2, CSCW (November 2018), 1--28.

Digital Library

[46]

Shagun Jhaver, Iris Birman, Eric Gilbert, and Amy Bruckman. 2019. Human-Machine Collaboration for Content Regulation: The Case of Reddit Automoderator. ACM Trans. Comput. Interact. 26, 5 (July 2019), 1--35.

Digital Library

[47]

Shagun Jhaver, Amy Buckman, and Eric Gilbert. 2019. Does Transparency in Moderation Really Matter?: User Behavior After Content Removal Explanations on Reddit. Proc. ACM Human-Computer Interact. 3, CSCW (2019), 27.

Digital Library

[48]

Jialun Jiang, Charles Kiene, Skyler Middler, Jed R. Brubaker, and Casey Fiesler. 2019. Moderation Challenges in Voice-based Online Communities on Discord. PACMHCI 3, CSCW (2019), 1--23.

[49]

Victor Kaptelinin. 1996. Activity Theory: Implications for Human-Computer Interaction. In Context and Consciousness: Activity Theory and Human-computer Interaction. MIT Press, 103--116.

Digital Library

[50]

Victor Kaptelinin and Bonnie A. Nardi. 2006. Acting with Technology: Activity Theory and Interaction Design. The MIT Press.

Digital Library

[51]

Victor Kaptelinin, Bonnie Nardi, Susanne Bødker, John Carroll, Jim Hollan, Edwin Hutchins, and Terry Winograd. 2003. Post-cognitivist HCI: second-wave theories. In CHI '03 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems - CHI '03, 692--693.

Digital Library

[52]

Rob Kitchin. 2017. Thinking critically about and researching algorithms. Information, Commun. Soc. 20, 1 (January 2017), 14--29.

[53]

René F. Kizilcec. 2016. How Much Information?: Effects of Transparency on Trust in an Algorithmic Interface. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '16, 2390--2395.

Digital Library

[54]

Yubo Kou and Xinning Gui. 2017. When Code Governs Community. In 2017 50th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[55]

Yubo Kou, Xinning Gui, and Yong Ming Kow. 2016. Ranking Practices and Distinction in League of Legends. In Proceedings of the 2016 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play - CHI PLAY '16, 4--9.

Digital Library

[56]

Yubo Kou, Xinning Gui, Shaozeng Zhang, and Bonnie Nardi. 2017. Managing Disruptive Behavior through Non-Hierarchical Governance: Crowdsourcing in League of Legends and Weibo. Proc. ACM Human-Computer Interact. 1, CSCW (2017), 62.

Digital Library

[57]

Yubo Kou and Bonnie Nardi. 2013. Regulating Anti-Social Behavior on the Internet: The Example of League of Legends. In iConference 2013 Proceedings, 616--622.

[58]

Yubo Kou and Bonnie Nardi. 2014. Governance in League of Legends: A Hybrid System. In Foundations of Digital Games.

[59]

Min Kyung Lee, Anuraag Jain, Hea Jin Cha, Shashank Ojha, and Daniel Kusbit. 2019. Procedural Justice in Algorithmic Fairness: Leveraging Transparency and Outcome Control for Fair Algorithmic Mediation. Proc. ACM Human-Computer Interact. 3, CSCW (November 2019), 1--26.

Digital Library

[60]

Min Kyung Lee, Alexandros Psomas, Ariel D. Procaccia, Daniel Kusbit, Anson Kahng, Ji Tae Kim, Xinran Yuan, Allissa Chan, Daniel See, Ritesh Noothigattu, and Siheon Lee. 2019. WeBuildAI: Participatory Framework for Algorithmic Governance. Proc. ACM Human-Computer Interact. 3, CSCW (November 2019), 1--35.

[61]

Yannick LeJacq. 2015. How League Of Legends Enables Toxicity. kotaku. Retrieved from https://kotaku.com/how-league-of-legends-enables-toxicity-1693572469

[62]

Alexei Leontev. 1978. Activity, Consciousness, and Personality. Prentice-Hall.

[63]

David Lewis. 1986. Causal explanation. In Philosophical Papers Vol. Ii. 214--240. Retrieved April 1, 2019 from https://philpapers.org/rec/LEWCE

[64]

Michael Lockwood, Julie Davidson, Allan Curtis, Elaine Stratford, and Rod Griffith. 2010. Governance Principles for Natural Resource Management. Soc. Nat. Resour. 23, 10 (August 2010), 986--1001.

[65]

Bertram F. Malle. 2006. How the Mind Explains Behavior: Folk Explanations, Meaning, and Social Interaction. MIT Press.

[66]

Lena Mamykina, Drashko Nakikj, and Noemie Elhadad. 2015. Collective Sensemaking in Online Health Forums. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '15, 3217--3226.

Digital Library

[67]

Adrienne Massanari. 2017. #Gamergate and The Fappening: How Reddit's algorithm, governance, and culture support toxic technocultures. New Media Soc. 19, 3 (March 2017), 329--346.

[68]

G. Randolph Mayes. 2020. Theories of Explanation. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved from https://www.iep.utm.edu/explanat/#SH4e

[69]

Tim Miller. 2019. Explanation in artificial intelligence: Insights from the social sciences. Artif. Intell. 267, (February 2019), 1--38.

[70]

Tim Miller, Piers Howe, and Liz Sonenberg. 2017. Explainable AI: Beware of Inmates Running the Asylum Or: How I Learnt to Stop Worrying and Love the Social and Behavioural Sciences. In IJCAI 2017 Workshop on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI). Retrieved March 2, 2019 from http://arxiv.org/abs/1712.00547

[71]

Brent Daniel Mittelstadt, Patrick Allo, Mariarosaria Taddeo, Sandra Wachter, and Luciano Floridi. 2016. The ethics of algorithms: Mapping the debate. Big Data Soc. 3, 2 (December 2016), 205395171667967.

[72]

Brent Mittelstadt, Chris Russell, and Sandra Wachter. 2018. Explaining Explanations in AI. In Proceedings of the Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency FAT* '19, 279--288.

[73]

Robert J. Moore, Nicolas Ducheneaut, and Eric Nickell. 2007. Doing Virtually Nothing: Awareness and Accountability in Massively Multiplayer Online Worlds. Comput. Support. Coop. Work 16, 3 (June 2007), 265--305.

Digital Library

[74]

Michael J. Muller and Sarah Kuhn. 1993. Participatory design. Commun. ACM 36, 6 (June 1993), 24--28.

Digital Library

[75]

Bonnie A Nardi. 1996. Activity Theory and Human-computer Interaction. In Context and consciousness: activity theory and human-computer interaction. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.

[76]

Simon Parkin. 2015. A Video-Game Algorithm to Solve Online Abuse. MIT Technology Review'. Retrieved from https://www.technologyreview.com/s/541151/a-video-game-algorithm-to-solve-online-abuse/

[77]

Katie Pine. 2012. Fragmentation and choreography: caring for a patient and a chart during childbirth. In Proceedings of the ACM 2012 conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work - CSCW '12, 887--896.

Digital Library

[78]

Emilee Rader, Kelley Cotter, and Janghee Cho. 2018. Explanations as Mechanisms for Supporting Algorithmic Transparency. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '18, 1--13.

Digital Library

[79]

Emilee Rader and Rebecca Gray. 2015. Understanding User Beliefs About Algorithmic Curation in the Facebook News Feed. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '15, 173--182.

Digital Library

[80]

Chris Reed. 2018. How should we regulate artificial intelligence? Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 376, 2128 (September 2018), 20170360.

[81]

Howard Rheingold. 1993. The Virtual Community: Homesteading on the Electronic Frontier. MIT Press. Retrieved January 22, 2015 from http://books.google.com/books/about/The_Virtual_Community.html?id=fr8bdUDisqAC&pgis=1

[82]

Sarah T. Roberts. 2016. Commercial Content Moderation: Digital Laborers? Dirty Work. Media Stud. Publ. (January 2016). Retrieved September 1, 2019 from https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/commpub/12

[83]

Yvonne Rogers. 2004. New theoretical approaches for human-computer interaction. Annu. Rev. Inf. Sci. Technol. 38, 1 (September 2004), 87--143.

[84]

Wojciech Samek, Thomas Wiegand, and Klaus-Robert Müller. 2017. Explainable Artificial Intelligence: Understanding, Visualizing and Interpreting Deep Learning Models. (August 2017). Retrieved March 23, 2019 from http://arxiv.org/abs/1708.08296

[85]

Rachel Samples. 2018. How Many People Play League of Legends? dbltap. Retrieved from https://www.dbltap.com/posts/6249990-how-many-people-play-league-of-legends

[86]

Sarita Yardi Schoenebeck. 2014. Giving up Twitter for Lent: how and why we take breaks from social media. In Proceedings of the 32nd annual ACM conference on Human factors in computing systems - CHI '14, 773--782.

Digital Library

[87]

Kenneth B. Shores, Yilin He, Kristina L. Swanenburg, Robert Kraut, and John Riedl. 2014. The identification of deviance and its impact on retention in a multiplayer game. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work & social computing - CSCW '14, 1356--1365.

Digital Library

[88]

Spandana Singh. 2019. Everything in Moderation: An Analysis of How Internet Platforms Are Using Artificial Intelligence to Moderate User-Generated Content.

[89]

Lucy A. Suchman. 1987. Plans and situated actions: the problem of human-machine communication. Cambridge University Press. Retrieved July 28, 2015 from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=38407

[90]

Nicolas Suzor and Darryl Woodford. 2013. Evaluating Consent and Legitimacy Amongst Shifting Community Norms: an EVE Online Case Study. J. Virtual Worlds Res. 6, 3 (September 2013).

[91]

Tolga Tanriseven. 2019. Applying AI To Make Online Communities More Authentic. forbes. Retrieved from https://www.forbes.com/sites/theyec/2019/12/26/applying-ai-to-make-online-communities-more-authentic/#2a0b2d7424d6

[92]

The Cybersmile Foundation. 2018. AI moderation slashes verbal abuse in League of Legends. cybersmile. Retrieved from https://www.cybersmile.org/news/ai-moderation-slashes-verbal-abuse-in-league-of-legends

[93]

Ilkka Tuomi. 2019. The impact of artificial intelligence on learning, teaching, and education policies for the future. European Commission. Available from: EU Bookshop. e-mail: [email protected]; Web site: http://bookshop.europa.eu/en/home/. Retrieved September 18, 2019 from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED597677

[94]

Michael Veale, Max Van Kleek, and Reuben Binns. 2018. Fairness and Accountability Design Needs for Algorithmic Support in High-Stakes Public Sector Decision-Making. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '18, 1--14.

Digital Library

[95]

Frédérique de Vignemont. 2011. Embodiment, ownership and disownership. Conscious. Cogn. 20, 1 (March 2011), 82--93.

[96]

Lev Vygotsky. 1978. Mind in society?: the development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.

[97]

Sandra Wachter, Brent Mittelstadt, and Chris Russell. 2018. Counterfactual Explanations Without Opening the Black Box: Automated Decisions and the GDPR. Harv. J. Law Technol. 31, 2 (2018).

[98]

Claudia Wagner, David Garcia, Mohsen Jadidi, and Markus Strohmaier. 2015. It's a Man's Wikipedia? Assessing Gender Inequality in an Online Encyclopedia. Ninth Int. AAAI Conf. Web Soc. Media (April 2015). Retrieved October 22, 2019 from https://www.aaai.org/ocs/index.php/ICWSM/ICWSM15/paper/viewPaper/10585

[99]

Danding Wang, Qian Yang, Ashraf Abdul, and Brian Y. Lim. 2019. Designing Theory-Driven User-Centric Explainable AI. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '19, 1--15.

Cited By

De Garayo AGalarza MAguerri JOrtega A(2024)New Forms of Victimization Linked to Video GamesModern Insights and Strategies in Victimology10.4018/979-8-3693-2201-7.ch003(56-75)Online publication date: 26-Apr-2024
https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-2201-7.ch003
Chauncey SMcKenna H(2024)Creativity and Innovation in Civic Spaces Supported by Cognitive Flexibility When Learning with AI Chatbots in Smart CitiesUrban Science10.3390/urbansci80100168:1(16)Online publication date: 16-Feb-2024
https://doi.org/10.3390/urbansci8010016
Suma Priyadarshini. B. K. (2024)THE IMPACT OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE ON CREATIVE WRITING: IS IT BENEFICIAL OR DETRIMENTAL DEVELOPMENT?ShodhKosh: Journal of Visual and Performing Arts10.29121/shodhkosh.v5.i7.2024.19175:7Online publication date: 31-Jul-2024
https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v5.i7.2024.1917
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

Mediating Community-AI Interaction through Situated Explanation: The Case of AI-Led Moderation
1. Human-centered computing
  1. Human computer interaction (HCI)

Recommendations

Expanding Explainability: Towards Social Transparency in AI systems
CHI '21: Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

As AI-powered systems increasingly mediate consequential decision-making, their explainability is critical for end-users to take informed and accountable actions. Explanations in human-human interactions are socially-situated. AI systems are often socio-...
Situated Accountability: Ethical Principles, Certification Standards, and Explanation Methods in Applied AI
AIES '21: Proceedings of the 2021 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society

Artificial intelligence (AI) has the potential to benefit humans and society by its employment in important sectors. However, the risks of negative consequences have underscored the importance of accountability for AI systems, their outcomes, and the ...
Introduction to Explainable AI
CHI EA '20: Extended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

As Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies are increasingly used to make important decisions and perform autonomous tasks, providing explanations that allow users to understand the AI has become a ubiquitous concern in human-AI interaction. Recently, a ...

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction

Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction Volume 4, Issue CSCW2

CSCW

October 2020

2310 pages

EISSN:2573-0142

DOI:10.1145/3430143

Editor:
Jeff Nichols
Apple Inc.

Issue’s Table of Contents

Copyright © 2020 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 15 October 2020

Published in PACMHCI Volume 4, Issue CSCW2

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

34
Total Citations
View Citations
1,051
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)295
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)22

Reflects downloads up to 25 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

De Garayo AGalarza MAguerri JOrtega A(2024)New Forms of Victimization Linked to Video GamesModern Insights and Strategies in Victimology10.4018/979-8-3693-2201-7.ch003(56-75)Online publication date: 26-Apr-2024
https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-2201-7.ch003
Chauncey SMcKenna H(2024)Creativity and Innovation in Civic Spaces Supported by Cognitive Flexibility When Learning with AI Chatbots in Smart CitiesUrban Science10.3390/urbansci80100168:1(16)Online publication date: 16-Feb-2024
https://doi.org/10.3390/urbansci8010016
Suma Priyadarshini. B. K. (2024)THE IMPACT OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE ON CREATIVE WRITING: IS IT BENEFICIAL OR DETRIMENTAL DEVELOPMENT?ShodhKosh: Journal of Visual and Performing Arts10.29121/shodhkosh.v5.i7.2024.19175:7Online publication date: 31-Jul-2024
https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v5.i7.2024.1917
Wilkinson DHanley EKnijnenburg B(2024)A Comparative Analysis of Legislative Protections for Online Safety in the Global South: A Case Study of the CaribbeanProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36869018:CSCW2(1-29)Online publication date: 8-Nov-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3686901
Sparrow LGalwey RJovic DHardwick TButt M(2024)Towards Ethical AI Moderation in Multiplayer GamesProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36771098:CHI PLAY(1-30)Online publication date: 15-Oct-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3677109
Nguyen QLe LTran XDo TLin CKostakos VKay JHoang T(2024)FairAD-XAI: Evaluation Framework for Explainable AI Methods in Alzheimer's Disease Detection with Fairness-in-the-loopCompanion of the 2024 on ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing10.1145/3675094.3678998(870-876)Online publication date: 5-Oct-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3675094.3678998
Huang ESarma AHwang SChandrasekharan EChancellor S(2024)Opportunities, tensions, and challenges in computational approaches to addressing online harassmentProceedings of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3643834.3661623(1483-1498)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3643834.3661623
Rifat MAsha AJadon SYan XGuha SAhmed S(2024)Combating Islamophobia: Compromise, Community, and Harmony in Mitigating Harmful Online ContentACM Transactions on Social Computing10.1145/36415107:1-4(1-32)Online publication date: 27-Apr-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3641510
Zhang ZTsiakas KSchneegass C(2024)Explaining the Wait: How Justifying Chatbot Response Delays Impact User TrustProceedings of the 6th ACM Conference on Conversational User Interfaces10.1145/3640794.3665550(1-16)Online publication date: 8-Jul-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3640794.3665550
Gunturi UKumar ADing XRho E(2024)Linguistically Differentiating Acts and Recalls of Racial Microaggressions on Social MediaProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36373668:CSCW1(1-36)Online publication date: 26-Apr-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3637366
Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Article

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Issue’s Table of Contents