Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/3411763.3451665acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
poster

Labour of Love: Volunteer Perceptions on Building Relatedness in Online Volunteering Communities

Published: 08 May 2021 Publication History

Abstract

Volunteerism in the digital age offers many new possibilities and avenues for public participation. In this paper, we discuss volunteering as a form of work and how certain experiential aspects of HCI systems supporting the volunteers’ unpaid labour are instrumental in volunteer wellbeing. The sense of feeling close to others and experiencing relatedness is an important factor that can predict engagement and wellbeing of volunteers. Relatedness can be achieved in many ways, for instance, through expressing and receiving gratitude. Through four co-design workshops with n=9 participants, we identified seven perceptions of volunteers regarding their relatedness experiences. This was achieved via a case study of an online teleconferencing platform where volunteers help train and assess medical students for their medical communication skills. Findings are further discussed to inform future design to support adequate level of formalness and emotional labour in online volunteering communities.

References

[1]
S. E. Fox, “Worker-Centered Design: Expanding HCI Methods for Supporting Labor,” in Extended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2020, pp. 1–8.
[2]
G. K. Chesterton, Robert browning. Grosset & Dunlap, 1908.
[3]
K. Z. Naqshbandi, C. Liu, S. Taylor, R. Lim, N. Ahmadpour, and R. Calvo, “‘I Am Most Grateful.’ Using Gratitude to Improve the Sense of Relatedness and Motivation for Online Volunteerism,” Int. J. Human–Computer Interact., vol. 36, no. 14, pp. 1–17, Apr. 2020.
[4]
W. D. Cockshaw, I. M. Shochet, and P. L. Obst, “Depression and Belongingness in General and Workplace Contexts: A Cross-Lagged Longitudinal Investigation,” J. Soc. Clin. Psychol., vol. 33, no. 5, pp. 448–462, Apr. 2014.
[5]
S. Mérida‐López, N. Extremera, C. Quintana‐Orts, and L. Rey, “In pursuit of job satisfaction and happiness: Testing the interactive contribution of emotion-regulation ability and workplace social support,” Scand. J. Psychol., vol. 60, no. 1, pp. 59–66, 2019.
[6]
D. Sirota and D. Klein, The enthusiastic employee: How companies profit by giving workers what they want. FT Press, 2013.
[7]
A. M. Grant and F. Gino, “A little thanks goes a long way: Explaining why gratitude expressions motivate prosocial behavior.,” J. Pers. Soc. Psychol., vol. 98, no. 6, p. 946, 2010.
[8]
M. Mahipalan and S. S, “Workplace Spirituality and Subjective Happiness Among High School Teachers: Gratitude As A Moderator,” EXPLORE, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 107–114, Mar. 2019.
[9]
R. Fehr, A. Fulmer, E. Awtrey, and J. A. Miller, “The Grateful Workplace: A Multilevel Model of Gratitude in Organizations,” Acad. Manage. Rev., vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 361–381, Feb. 2016.
[10]
A. Stegen and J. Wankier, “Generating Gratitude in the Workplace to Improve Faculty Job Satisfaction,” J. Nurs. Educ., vol. 57, no. 6, pp. 375–378, Jun. 2018.
[11]
A. Baruch, A. May, and D. Yu, “The motivations, enablers and barriers for voluntary participation in an online crowdsourcing platform,” Comput. Hum. Behav., vol. 64, pp. 923–931, Nov. 2016.
[12]
Y.-H. Kim, E. K. Choe, B. Lee, and J. Seo, “Understanding personal productivity,” 2019.
[13]
A. Uhde, N. Schlicker, D. P. Wallach, and M. Hassenzahl, “Fairness and Decision-making in Collaborative Shift Scheduling Systems,” in Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2020, pp. 1–13.
[14]
M. Bernstein, “Micro-volunteering: helping the helpers in development,” in Proceedings of the 2013 conference on Computer supported cooperative work companion, 2013, pp. 85–88.
[15]
R. Dur and A. Glazer, “The desire for impact,” J. Econ. Psychol., vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 285–300, 2008.
[16]
A. Voida, Z. Yao, and M. Korn, “(Infra)Structures of Volunteering,” in Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing, New York, NY, USA, 2015, pp. 1704–1716.
[17]
R. A. Cnaan, F. Handy, and M. Wadsworth, “Defining Who is a Volunteer: Conceptual and Empirical Considerations,” Nonprofit Volunt. Sect. Q., vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 364–383, Sep. 1996.
[18]
V. Millette and M. Gagné, “Designing volunteers’ tasks to maximize motivation, satisfaction and performance: The impact of job characteristics on volunteer engagement,” Motiv. Emot., vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 11–22, Mar. 2008.
[19]
K. Z. Naqshbandi, S. Taylor, A. Pillai, and N. Ahmadpour, “Designing for Helpers: Identifying new design opportunities for digital volunteerism,” presented at the DRS, 2020.
[20]
R. Mirabella, “Rebecca Tiessen, Benjamin J. Lough, and Kate E. Grantham (eds.), Insights on International Volunteering: Perspectives from the Global South,” Volunt. Int. J. Volunt. Nonprofit Organ., Jul. 2020.
[21]
K. Ackermann and A. Manatschal, “Online volunteering as a means to overcome unequal participation? The profiles of online and offline volunteers compared,” New Media Soc., vol. 20, no. 12, pp. 4453–4472, Dec. 2018.
[22]
J. Piatak, N. Dietz, and B. McKeever, “Bridging or deepening the digital divide: Influence of household internet access on formal and informal volunteering,” Nonprofit Volunt. Sect. Q., vol. 48, no. 2_suppl, pp. 123S–150S, 2019.
[23]
I. F. Ogbonnaya-Ogburu, A. D. Smith, A. To, and K. Toyama, “Critical Race Theory for HCI,” in Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2020, pp. 1–16.
[24]
S. Bardzell, “Feminist HCI: taking stock and outlining an agenda for design,” in Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, 2010, pp. 1301–1310.
[25]
A. Marková, “The ‘inclusive volunteering’ phenomenon: Research into the volunteering of people with disabilities,” Kontakt, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. e48–e56, 2018.
[26]
R. M. Ryan and E. L. Deci, “To be happy or to be self-fulfilled: A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being,” Annu. Rev. Psychol., vol. 52, no. 16, pp. 141–166, 2001.
[27]
C. D. Ryff and B. H. Singer, “Know thyself and become what you are: A eudaimonic approach to psychological well-being,” J. Happiness Stud., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 13–39, 2008.
[28]
R. A. Calvo and D. Peters, Positive Computing: Technology for wellbeing and human potential. MIT Press, 2014.
[29]
V. G. Kasser and R. M. Ryan, “The Relation of Psychological Needs for Autonomy and Relatedness to Vitality, Well-Being, and Mortality in a Nursing Home 1,” J. Appl. Soc. Psychol., vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 935–954, 1999.
[30]
R. B. King, “Sense of relatedness boosts engagement, achievement, and well-being: A latent growth model study,” Contemp. Educ. Psychol., vol. 42, pp. 26–38, 2015.
[31]
L. Pavey, T. Greitemeyer, and P. Sparks, “Highlighting relatedness promotes prosocial motives and behavior,” Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull., vol. 37, no. 7, pp. 905–917, 2011.
[32]
R. F. Baumeister and M. R. Leary, “The need to belong: desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation.,” Psychol. Bull., vol. 117, no. 3, p. 497, 1995.
[33]
R. M. Lee and S. B. Robbins, “Measuring belongingness: The social connectedness and the social assurance scales.,” J. Couns. Psychol., vol. 42, no. 2, p. 232, 1995.
[34]
J. Morse, J. Cerretani, S. Halai, J. Laing, and M. Perez, “doGooder: Fostering volunteer communities to serve the homeless,” in CHI ’08 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, New York, NY, USA, 2008, pp. 3843–3848.
[35]
S. K. Kane and P. V. Klasnja, “Supporting Volunteer Activities with Mobile Social Software,” in CHI ’09 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, New York, NY, USA, 2009, pp. 4567–4572.
[36]
R. Farzan, R. Kraut, A. Pal, and J. Konstan, “Socializing Volunteers in an Online Community: A Field Experiment,” in Proceedings of the ACM 2012 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, New York, NY, USA, 2012, pp. 325–334.
[37]
C. R. Snyder and S. J. Lopez, Eds., Handbook of positive psychology. Oxford [England] ; New York: Oxford University Press, 2002.
[38]
R. A. Emmons and A. Mishra, “Why gratitude enhances well-being: What we know, what we need to know,” Des. Posit. Psychol. Tak. Stock Mov. Forw., pp. 248–262, 2011.
[39]
A. Ghandeharioun, A. Azaria, S. Taylor, and R. W. Picard, “‘Kind and Grateful’: A Context-Sensitive Smartphone App Utilizing Inspirational Content to Promote Gratitude,” Psychol. Well-Being, vol. 6, no. 1, p. 9, Jul. 2016.
[40]
M. Fuller-Tyszkiewicz, “A randomized trial exploring mindfulness and gratitude exercises as eHealth-based micro-interventions for improving body satisfaction,” Comput. Hum. Behav., vol. 95, pp. 58–65, Jun. 2019.
[41]
Y. Kim, D. Kato, K. Kunieda, and K. Yamada, “Preliminary user study for gratitude and reciprocity in a q&a system,” in Proceedings of the 2013 conference on Computer supported cooperative work companion, New York, NY, USA, Feb. 2013, pp. 169–174.
[42]
J. A. Smith and P. Shinebourne, Interpretative phenomenological analysis. American Psychological Association, 2012.
[43]
A. R. Hochshild, “The managed heart: Commercialization of human feeling,” Berkeley Univ. Calif. Press ANTA 2003 Shap. Our Future Aust. Natl. Strategy Vocat. Educ. Train. VET Brisb. Aust. Natl. Train. Auth., 1983.
[44]
N. Raval and P. Dourish, “Standing out from the crowd: Emotional labor, body labor, and temporal labor in ridesharing,” in Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing, 2016, pp. 97–107.
[45]
C. Cobb, “Designing for the Deluge: Understanding & Supporting the Distributed, Collaborative Work of Crisis Volunteers,” in Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing, New York, NY, USA, 2014, pp. 888–899.
[46]
K. Naqshbandi, “Codesigning technology for a voluntary-sector organization,” Hum. Technol., vol. 15, no. 1, 2019.
[47]
D. Y. Wohn, “Volunteer Moderators in Twitch Micro Communities: How They Get Involved, the Roles They Play, and the Emotional Labor They Experience,” in Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, New York, NY, USA, May 2019, pp. 1–13.
[48]
C. J. Einolf, “Gender Differences in the Correlates of Volunteering and Charitable Giving,” Nonprofit Volunt. Sect. Q., vol. 40, no. 6, pp. 1092–1112, Dec. 2011.
[49]
B. Collier and J. Bear, “Conflict, criticism, or confidence: an empirical examination of the gender gap in wikipedia contributions,” in Proceedings of the ACM 2012 conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, New York, NY, USA, Feb. 2012, pp. 383–392.
[50]
A. Menking and I. Erickson, “The heart work of Wikipedia: Gendered, emotional labor in the world's largest online encyclopedia,” in Proceedings of the 33rd annual ACM conference on human factors in computing systems, 2015, pp. 207–210.
[51]
H. K. Liu, Y. D. Harrison, J. J. K. Lai, G. L. Chikoto, and K. Jones-Lungo, “Online and Virtual Volunteering,” in The Palgrave Handbook of Volunteering, Civic Participation, and Nonprofit Associations, D. H. Smith, D. H. Smith, D. H. Smith, D. H. Smith, D. H. Smith, R. A. Stebbins, J. Grotz, and J. Grotz, Eds. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2016, pp. 290–310.
[52]
R. Spear, G. Erdi, M. A. Parker, and M. Anastasiadis, “Innovations in Citizen Response to Crises: Volunteerism & Social Mobilization During COVID-19,” Interface J. Soc. Mov., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 383–391, 2020.
[53]
United Nations Volunteers, “Home | UNV Online Volunteering service.” https://www.onlinevolunteering.org/en (accessed Jan. 07, 2021).

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)A Pilot Study on People's Views of Gratitude Practices and Reactions to Expressing Gratitude in an Online CommunityCompanion Publication of the 2023 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing10.1145/3584931.3607000(182-188)Online publication date: 14-Oct-2023
  • (2022)Exploring the experience of ethical tensions and the role of community in UX practiceNordic Human-Computer Interaction Conference10.1145/3546155.3546683(1-13)Online publication date: 8-Oct-2022
  • (2022)Making space for faith, religion, and spirituality in prosocial HCIInteractions10.1145/354430129:4(62-67)Online publication date: 29-Jun-2022
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
CHI EA '21: Extended Abstracts of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
May 2021
2965 pages
ISBN:9781450380959
DOI:10.1145/3411763
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 08 May 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Gratitude
  2. Relatedness
  3. Volunteering
  4. Work

Qualifiers

  • Poster
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Conference

CHI '21
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 6,164 of 23,696 submissions, 26%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)44
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)5
Reflects downloads up to 03 Oct 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)A Pilot Study on People's Views of Gratitude Practices and Reactions to Expressing Gratitude in an Online CommunityCompanion Publication of the 2023 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing10.1145/3584931.3607000(182-188)Online publication date: 14-Oct-2023
  • (2022)Exploring the experience of ethical tensions and the role of community in UX practiceNordic Human-Computer Interaction Conference10.1145/3546155.3546683(1-13)Online publication date: 8-Oct-2022
  • (2022)Making space for faith, religion, and spirituality in prosocial HCIInteractions10.1145/354430129:4(62-67)Online publication date: 29-Jun-2022
  • (2022)Exploring Volunteer Motivation, Identity and Meaning-Making in Digital Science-Based Research VolunteeringInternational Journal of Human–Computer Interaction10.1080/10447318.2022.210924639:20(4090-4111)Online publication date: 29-Aug-2022

View Options

Get Access

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

HTML Format

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media