Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/2370216.2370292acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesubicompConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Making technology homey: finding sources of satisfaction and meaning in home automation

Published: 05 September 2012 Publication History

Abstract

Home and automation are not natural partners--one homey and the other cold. Most current automation in the home is packaged in the form of appliances. To better understand the current reality and possible future of living with other types of domestic technology, we went out into the field to conduct need finding interviews among people who have already introduced automation into their homes and kept it there--home automators. We present the lessons learned from these home automators as frameworks and implications for the values that domestic technology should support. In particular, we focus on the satisfaction and meaning that the home automators derived from their projects, especially in connecting to their homes (rather than simply controlling their homes). These results point the way toward other technologies designed for our everyday lives at home.

References

[1]
ADT Security Systems. http://www.adt.com.
[2]
R. Aipperspach, B. Hooker, and A. Woodruff. The heterogeneous home. In Proc. UbiComp, pages 222--231, 2008.
[3]
S. L. Beckman and M. Barry. Innovation as a learning process: Embedding design thinking. California Management Review, 50(1):25--56, 2007.
[4]
S. L. Beckman and M. Barry. Design and innovation through storytelling. International Journal of Innovation Science, 1(4):151--160, 2009.
[5]
G. Bell, M. Blythe, and P. Sengers. Making by making strange: Defamiliarization adn the design of domestic technologies. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 12(2):149--173, 2005.
[6]
S. Bly, B. Schilit, D. W. McDonald, B. Rosario, and Y. Saint-Hillaire. Broken expectations in the digital home. In Ext. Abstracts of CHI, pages 568--573, 2006.
[7]
S. Brand. How buildings learn: What happens after they're built. Viking, 1994.
[8]
J. Bruner. Acts of Meaning. Harvard University Press, 1990.
[9]
A. B. Brush, B. Lee, R. Mahajan, S. Agarwal, S. Saroiu, and C. Dixon. Home automation in the wild: Challenges and opportunities. In Proc. CHI, pages 2115--2124, 2011.
[10]
K. Caine, S. Sabanovic, and M. Carter. The effect of monitoring by cameras and robots on the privacy enhancing behaviors of older adults. In Proc. HRI, 2012.
[11]
E. Choe, S. Consolvo, J. Jong, B. Harrison, and J. Kientz. Living in a Glass House: A Survey of Private Moments in the Home. In Proc. UbiComp, 2011.
[12]
L. Corbusier. Towards a New Architecture. Dover, New York, 1985.
[13]
S. Davidoff, C. Lee, M.and Yiu, J. Zimmerman, and A. Dey. Principles of smart home control. In Proc. UbiComp, pages 19--34, 2006.
[14]
C. Dixon, R. Mahajan, S. Agarwal, A. B. Brush, B. Lee, S. S., and V. Bahl. The home needs an operating system (and an app store). In Proc. Hotnets, pages 1--6, 2010.
[15]
W. K. Edwards and R. E. Grinter. At home with ubiquitous computing: Seven challenges. In Proc. UbiComp, pages 256--272, 2001.
[16]
J. Forlizzi and C. DiSalvo. Service robots in the domestic environment: A study of the roomba vacuum in the home. In Proc. HRI, pages 258--265, 2006.
[17]
J. Froehlich, E. Larson, T. Campbell, C. Haggerty, J. Fogarty, and S. Patel. HydroSense: Infrastructure-Mediated Single-Point Sensing of Whole-Home Water Activity. In Proc. UbiComp, 2009.
[18]
B. Gates. A robot in every home. Scientific American, pages 58--65, 2007.
[19]
S. Gupta, M. Reynolds, and S. Patel. ElectriSense: Single-point sensing using EMI for electrical event detection and classification in the home. In Proc. UbiComp, 2010.
[20]
L. Hamill. Controlling smart devices in the home. The Information Society, 22:241--249, 2006.
[21]
R. Harper. The Connected Home: The Future of Domestic Life. Springer, 2011.
[22]
S. Intille. Designing a home of the future. IEEE Pervasive Computing, 1(2):80--86, 2002.
[23]
Y. Jiang, K. Li, L. Tian, R. Piedrahita, X. Yun, O. Mansata, Q. Lu, R. Dick, M. Hannigan, and L. Shang. MAQS: A personalized mobile sensing system for indoor air quality monitoring. In UbiComp, 2011.
[24]
R. Kaplan and S. Kaplan. The Experience of Nature. Cambridge University Press, 1989.
[25]
J. A. Kientz, S. N. Patel, B. Jones, E. Price, E. D. Mynatt, and G. D. Abowd. The Georgia Tech Aware Home. In Proc. CHI, pages 3675--3680, 2008.
[26]
S. Kim and E. Paulos. inAir: Measuring and Visualizing Indoor Air Quality. In Proc. UbiComp, 2009.
[27]
G. McCracken. Culture and consumptions II. Indiana University Press, 2005.
[28]
Nest. http://www.nest.com.
[29]
C. Pantofaru and L. Takayama. Need finding: A tool for directing robotics research and development. In RSS 2011 Workshop on perspectives and contributions to robotics from the human sciences, 2011.
[30]
C. Pantofaru, L. Takayama, T. Foote, and B. Soto. Exploring the role of robots in home organization. In Proc. HRI, pages 327--334, 2012.
[31]
E. Poole, M. Chetty, R. E. Grinter, and W. K. Edwards. More than meets the eye: Transforming the user experience of home network management. In Proc. DIS, pages 455--464, 2008.
[32]
B. H. Rasmussen, L. Jansson, and A. Norberg. Striving for becoming at-home in the midst of dying. American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine, 17(1):31--43, 2000.
[33]
J. Rode, E. Toye, and A. Blackwell. The domestic economy: A broader unit of analysis for end user programming. In Proc. CHI, pages 1757--1760, 2005.
[34]
E. M. Rogers. Diffusion of Innovations. Free Press, New York, 1983.
[35]
A. K. Romney, S. C. Weller, and W. H. Batchelder. Culture as consensus: A theory of culture and informant accuracy. American Anthropologist, 88(2):313--338, 1986.
[36]
J. Scott, A. Brush, J. Krumm, B. Meyers, M. Hazas, S. Hodges, and N. Villar. PreHeat: Controlling home heating using occupancy prediction. In UbiComp, 2011.
[37]
A. S. Taylor and L. Swan. Artful systems in the home. In Proc. CHI, pages 641--650, 2005.
[38]
P. Tolmie and A. Crabtree. Deploying research technology in the home. In Proc. CSCW, pages 639--648, 2008.
[39]
P. Tolmie, A. Crabtree, T. Rodden, C. Greenhalgh, and S. Benford. Making the home network at home: Digital housekeeping. In Proc. ECSCW, pages 331--350, 2007.
[40]
S. C. Weller. Cultural consensus theory. Field Methods, 4:339--368, 19.
[41]
A. Woodruff, S. Augustin, and B. Foucault. Sabbath day home automation: "It's like mixing technology and religion". In Proc. CHI, pages 527--536, 2007.

Cited By

View all

Index Terms

  1. Making technology homey: finding sources of satisfaction and meaning in home automation

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    UbiComp '12: Proceedings of the 2012 ACM Conference on Ubiquitous Computing
    September 2012
    1268 pages
    ISBN:9781450312240
    DOI:10.1145/2370216
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    In-Cooperation

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 05 September 2012

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. home automation
    2. need finding

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Conference

    Ubicomp '12
    Ubicomp '12: The 2012 ACM Conference on Ubiquitous Computing
    September 5 - 8, 2012
    Pennsylvania, Pittsburgh

    Acceptance Rates

    UbiComp '12 Paper Acceptance Rate 58 of 301 submissions, 19%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 764 of 2,912 submissions, 26%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)37
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)3
    Reflects downloads up to 01 Nov 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)How We Use Together: Coordinating Individual Preferences for Using Shared Devices at HomeProceedings of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3643834.3661634(3407-3418)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
    • (2024)Assessing Consumers’ Embrace of the Internet of ThingsSupply Chains10.1007/978-3-031-69351-9_24(276-305)Online publication date: 19-Oct-2024
    • (2024)Smart Home Technologies: Convenience and ControlHumane Autonomous Technology10.1007/978-3-031-66528-8_8(181-198)Online publication date: 22-Oct-2024
    • (2023)In Control or Being Controlled? Investigating the Control of Space Heating in Smart HomesSustainability10.3390/su1512948915:12(9489)Online publication date: 13-Jun-2023
    • (2023)Evaluating Smart Home Services and Items: A Living Lab User Experience StudyBuildings10.3390/buildings1301026313:1(263)Online publication date: 16-Jan-2023
    • (2023)Towards Panopticons of Convenience: Power in the Nordic Smart Home AssemblageProceedings of the 26th International Academic Mindtrek Conference10.1145/3616961.3616962(257-266)Online publication date: 3-Oct-2023
    • (2023)Making From Home: Reflections on Crafting Tangible Interfaces for Stay-at-home LivingProceedings of the Seventeenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction10.1145/3569009.3572744(1-16)Online publication date: 26-Feb-2023
    • (2023)Inhabiting Interconnected Spaces: How Users Shape and Appropriate Their Smart Home EcosystemsProceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3544548.3581497(1-18)Online publication date: 19-Apr-2023
    • (2022)Identifying the Key Drivers and Barriers of Smart Home Adoption: A Thematic Analysis from the Business PerspectiveSustainability10.3390/su1415905314:15(9053)Online publication date: 24-Jul-2022
    • (2022)Can you please cover both the "smart" and the "home"? Exploring expectations on smart homes considering changing needsProceedings of the 21st International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia10.1145/3568444.3568447(128-137)Online publication date: 27-Nov-2022
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    Get Access

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media