Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/2348283.2348290acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesirConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Learning to suggest: a machine learning framework for ranking query suggestions

Published: 12 August 2012 Publication History

Abstract

We consider the task of suggesting related queries to users after they issue their initial query to a web search engine. We propose a machine learning approach to learn the probability that a user may find a follow-up query both useful and relevant, given his initial query. Our approach is based on a machine learning model which enables us to generalize to queries that have never occurred in the logs as well. The model is trained on co-occurrences mined from the search logs, with novel utility and relevance models, and the machine learning step is done without any labeled data by human judges. The learning step allows us to generalize from the past observations and generate query suggestions that are beyond the past co-occurred queries. This brings significant gains in coverage while yielding modest gains in relevance. Both offline (based on human judges) and online (based on millions of user interactions) evaluations demonstrate that our approach significantly outperforms strong baselines.

References

[1]
D. Beeferman and A. Berger. Agglomerative clustering of a search engine query log. In Proceedings of the sixth ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pages 407--416. Acm Press, 2000.
[2]
P. Boldi, F. Bonchi, C. Castillo, D. Donato, A. Gionis, and S. Vigna. The query-flow graph: model and applications. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM conference on Information and knowledge management, CIKM '08, pages 609--618, New York, NY, USA, 2008. ACM.
[3]
P. Boldi, F. Bonchi, C. Castillo, D. Donato, and S. Vigna. Query suggestions using query-flow graphs. In Proceedings of the 2009 workshop on Web Search Click Data, WSCD '09, pages 56--63, New York, NY, USA, 2009. ACM.
[4]
O. Chapelle and Y. Chang. Yahoo! learning to rank challenge overview. Journal of Machine Learning Research - Proceedings Track, 14:1--24, 2011.
[5]
L. B. Chilton and J. Teevan. Addressing people's information needs directly in a web search result page. In Proceedings of the 20th international conference on World wide web, WWW '11, pages 27--36, 2011.
[6]
H. Deng, I. King, and M. R. Lyu. Entropy-biased models for query representation on the click graph. In Proceedings of the 32nd international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval, SIGIR '09, pages 339--346, New York, NY, USA, 2009. ACM.
[7]
T. Dunning. Accurate methods for the statistics of surprise and coincidence. Comput. Linguist., 19:61--74, March 1993.
[8]
L. Fitzpatrick and M. Dent. Automatic feedback using past queries: social searching? In Proceedings of the 20th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval, SIGIR '97, pages 306--313, New York, NY, USA, 1997. ACM.
[9]
J. H. Friedman. Greedy function approximation: A gradient boosting machine. Annals of Statistics, 29, 2000.
[10]
C. Huang, L. Chien, and Y. Oyang. Relevant term suggestion in interactive web search based on contextual information in query session logs. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54:638--649, 2003.
[11]
A. Jain, U. Ozertem, and E. Velipasaoglu. Synthesizing high utility suggestions for rare web search queries. In Proceedings of the 34th international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in Information, SIGIR '11, pages 805--814, 2011.
[12]
E. C. Jensen, S. M. Beitzel, A. Chowdhury, and O. Frieder. Query phrase suggestion from topically tagged session logs. In H. L. Larsen, G. Pasi, D. O. Arroyo, T. Andreasen, and H. Christiansen, editors, Flexible Query Answering Systems, 7th International Conference, FQAS 2006, Milan, Italy, June 7--10, 2006, Proceedings, volume 4027 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 185--196. Springer, 2006.
[13]
R. Jones, B. Rey, O. Madani, and W. Greiner. Generating query substitutions. In Proceedings of the 15th international conference on World Wide Web, WWW '06, pages 387--396, New York, NY, USA, 2006. ACM.
[14]
V. I. Levenshtein. Binary codes capable of correcting deletions, insertions, and reversals. Soviet Physics Doklady, (10), 1966.
[15]
Q. Mei, D. Zhou, and K. Church. Query suggestion using hitting time. In Proceeding of the 17th ACM conference on Information and knowledge management, CIKM '08, pages 469--478, New York, NY, USA, 2008. ACM.
[16]
G. A. Miller. Wordnet: A lexical database for english. Communications of the ACM, 38:39--41, 1995.
[17]
R. C. Moore. On Log-Likelihood-Ratios and the Significance of Rare Events. In Proceedings of the 2004 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP'04), 2004.
[18]
U. Ozertem, E. Velipasaoglu, and L. Lai. Suggestion set utility maximization using session logs. In Proceedings of the 20th international ACM Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, CIKM '11, 2011.
[19]
D. Paranjpe. Learning document aboutness from implicit user feedback and document structure. In CIKM '09: Proceeding of the 18th ACM conference on Information and knowledge management, pages 365--374. ACM, 2009.
[20]
V. V. Raghavan and H. Sever. On the reuse of past optimal queries. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pages 344--350. ACM Press, 1995.
[21]
C. H. Ricardo Baeza-Yates and M. Mendoza. Query recommendation using query logs in search engines. In Trends in Database Technology - EDBT 2004 Workshops, 2005.
[22]
E. Sadikov, J. Madhavan, L. Wang, and A. Halevy. Clustering query refinements by user intent. In Proceedings of the 19th international conference on World wide web, WWW '10, pages 841--850, New York, NY, USA, 2010. ACM.
[23]
I. Szpektor, A. Gionis, and Y. Maarek. Improving recommendation for long-tail queries via templates. In Proceedings of the 20th international conference on World wide web, WWW '11, pages 47--56, New York, NY, USA, 2011. ACM.
[24]
A. Thanopoulos, N. Fakotakis, and G. Kokkinakis. Comparative evaluation of collocation extraction metrics. In Proceedings of the 3rd Language Resources Evaluation Conference, pages 620--625, 2002.

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)Re2Dan: Retrieval of Medical Documents for e-Health in DanishProceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems10.1145/3604915.3610655(1208-1211)Online publication date: 14-Sep-2023
  • (2023)Recommending tasks based on search queries and missionsNatural Language Engineering10.1017/S1351324923000219(1-25)Online publication date: 17-May-2023
  • (2022)Personalized Query Suggestion with Searching Dynamic Flow for Online RecruitmentProceedings of the 31st ACM International Conference on Information & Knowledge Management10.1145/3511808.3557416(2773-2783)Online publication date: 17-Oct-2022
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Learning to suggest: a machine learning framework for ranking query suggestions

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Conferences
      SIGIR '12: Proceedings of the 35th international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval
      August 2012
      1236 pages
      ISBN:9781450314725
      DOI:10.1145/2348283
      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Sponsors

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 12 August 2012

      Permissions

      Request permissions for this article.

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. machine learning
      2. query log mining
      3. query suggestion
      4. search assistance

      Qualifiers

      • Research-article

      Conference

      SIGIR '12
      Sponsor:

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate 792 of 3,983 submissions, 20%

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)32
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)6
      Reflects downloads up to 28 Feb 2025

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all
      • (2023)Re2Dan: Retrieval of Medical Documents for e-Health in DanishProceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems10.1145/3604915.3610655(1208-1211)Online publication date: 14-Sep-2023
      • (2023)Recommending tasks based on search queries and missionsNatural Language Engineering10.1017/S1351324923000219(1-25)Online publication date: 17-May-2023
      • (2022)Personalized Query Suggestion with Searching Dynamic Flow for Online RecruitmentProceedings of the 31st ACM International Conference on Information & Knowledge Management10.1145/3511808.3557416(2773-2783)Online publication date: 17-Oct-2022
      • (2022)Interactive Query Clarification and Refinement via User SimulationProceedings of the 45th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval10.1145/3477495.3531871(2420-2425)Online publication date: 6-Jul-2022
      • (2021)On the Study of Transformers for Query SuggestionACM Transactions on Information Systems10.1145/347056240:1(1-27)Online publication date: 15-Oct-2021
      • (2021)A Hybrid Framework for Session Context ModelingACM Transactions on Information Systems10.1145/344812739:3(1-35)Online publication date: 5-May-2021
      • (2021)Towards a Better Understanding of Query Reformulation Behavior in Web SearchProceedings of the Web Conference 202110.1145/3442381.3450127(743-755)Online publication date: 19-Apr-2021
      • (2021)Question-formed Query Suggestion2021 IEEE International Conference on Big Knowledge (ICBK)10.1109/ICKG52313.2021.00071(1-8)Online publication date: Dec-2021
      • (2021)Multilevel Classification of Pakistani News using Machine Learning2021 22nd International Arab Conference on Information Technology (ACIT)10.1109/ACIT53391.2021.9677431(1-5)Online publication date: 21-Dec-2021
      • (2020)Analyzing and Learning from User Interactions for Search ClarificationProceedings of the 43rd International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval10.1145/3397271.3401160(1181-1190)Online publication date: 25-Jul-2020
      • Show More Cited By

      View Options

      Login options

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Figures

      Tables

      Media

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media