Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
article
Free access

A field study of exploratory learning strategies

Published: 01 September 1996 Publication History

Abstract

It has suggested that interactive computer users find “exploratory learning” to be an effective and attractive strategy for learning a new system or investigating unknown features of familiar software. In exploratory learning, instead of working through precisely sequenced training materials, the user investigates a system on his or her own initiative, often in pursuit of a real or artificial task. The value of exploratory learning has been studied in controlled settings, with special attention newly acquired systems, be there has been little investigation of its occurrence in natural situations or in support of ongoing learning. To address this question, a field study of the behavior and attitudes of computer users in everyday working situations was performed, using diaries and structured interviews that focused on learning events. The study showed that task-oriented exploration was a widely accepted method for learning, but that it often required support from manuals and from other users or system support personnel. Exploration not related to a current or pending task was infrequent, and most users believed it to be inefficient. These findings have implications for the design of systems, documentation, and training.

References

[1]
CARROLL, J. M. 1982. The adventure of getting to know a computer. IEEE Comput. 15, 11, 49-58.
[2]
CARROLL, J. M. 1990. The Nurnberg Funnel. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
[3]
CARROLL, J. M., MACK, R. L., LEWIS, C. H., GRISCHKOWSKY, N. L., AND ROBERTSON,S.P. 1985. Exploring a word processor. Hum. Comput. Interact. 1, 283-307.
[4]
CARROLL,J.M.AND MAZUR, S. A. 1986. Lisa learning. IEEE Comput. 19, 10, 35-49.
[5]
CARROLL,J.M.AND ROSSON, M. B. 1987. The paradox of the active user. In Interfacing Thought: Cognitive Aspects of Human-Computer Interaction, J. M. Carroll, Ed. MIT Press/ Bradford Books, Cambridge, Mass., 80-111.
[6]
DRAPER, S. W. 1984. The nature of expertise in UNIX. In Human-Computer Interaction: Interact '84. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, 465-471.
[7]
DUFFY, T., MEHLENACHER, B., AND PALMER, J. E. 1992. On Line Help: Design and Evalua-tion. Ablex, Norwood, N.J.
[8]
EGAN, D. E., REMDE, J. R., GOMEZ, L. M., LANDAUER, T. K., EBERHARDT, J., AND LOCHBAUM, C. C. 1989. Formative design-evaluation of Superbook. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. 7, 1, 30-57.
[9]
ENGELBECK, G. E. 1986. Exceptions to generalizations: Implications for formal models of human-computer interaction. Masters thesis, Dept. of Psychology, Univ. of Colorado, Boul-der, Colo. Unpublished.
[10]
ERICSSON, K. A., TESCH-RO ~ MER, C., AND KRAMPE, R. T. 1990. The role of practice and motivation in the acquisition of expert-level performance in real life: An empirical evalua-tion of a theoretical framework. In Encouraging the Development of Exceptional Skills and Talents, M. J. A. Howe, Ed. The British Psychological Society, Leicester, 109-130.
[11]
FISCHER, G. 1987. Cognitive view of reuse and redesign. IEEE Softw. 4 (July), 60-72.
[12]
FRANZKE, M. 1995. Turning research into practice: Characteristics of display-based interac-tion. In Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, New York, 421-428.
[13]
FRANZKE,M.AND RIEMAN, J. 1993. Natural training wheels: Learning and transfer between two versions of a computer application. In Proceedings of the Vienna Conference on Human Computer Interaction 93. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 317-328.
[14]
FURNAS, G. W., LANDAUER, T. K., GOMEZ, L. M., AND DUMAIS, S. T. 1987. The vocabulary problem in human-system communication. Commun. ACM 30, 11 (Nov.), 964-971.
[15]
GOULD, J. D., ALFARO, L., FINN, R., HAUPT, B., AND MINUTO, A. 1987. Reading from CRT displays can be as fast as reading from paper. Hum. Factors 26, 5, 497-515.
[16]
HOLT, R. W., BOEHM-DAVIS, D. A., AND SCHULTZ, A. C. 1989. Multilevel structured documen-tation. Hum. Factors 31, 2, 215-228.
[17]
JOHN,B.E.AND PACKER, H. 1995. Learning and using the cognitive walkthrough method: A case study approach. In Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, New York, 429-436.
[18]
LEWIS, C. 1988. Why and how to learn why: Analysis-based generalizations of procedures. Cog. Sci. 12, 211-256.
[19]
LEWIS,C.AND RIEMAN, J. 1993. Task-centered user interface design: A practical introduc-tion. Shareware electronic publication. Available via anonymous ftp to ftp.cs.colorado.edu.
[20]
MACKAY, W. 1990. Users and customizable software. A co-adaptive phenomenon. Ph.D. dissertation, Sloan School of Management. MIT, Cambridge, Mass.
[21]
MALONE, T. W. 1982. Heuristics for designing enjoyable user interfaces: Lessons from computer games. In Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, New York, 63-68.
[22]
NARDI, B. 1993. A Small Matter of Programming. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
[23]
NEAL, L. R. 1987. Cognition-sensitive design and user modeling for syntax-directed editors. In Proceedings of CHI1GI '87 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems and Graphics Interfaces. ACM, New York, 99-102.
[24]
NIELSEN, J., MACK, R. L., BERGENDORFF, K. H., AND GRISCHKOWSKY, N. L. 1986. Integrated software usage in the professional work environment: Evidence from questionnaires and interviews. In Proceedings of CHI'86 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, New York, 162-167.
[25]
POLSON,P.G.AND LEWIS, C. H. 1990. Theory-based design for easily learned interfaces. Hum. Comput. Interact. 6, 191-220.
[26]
RIEMAN, J. 1993. The diary study: A workplace-oriented tool to guide laboratory studies. In Proceedings of the InterCHI'93 Conference on Human Factors in Computer Systems. ACM, New York, 321-326.
[27]
RIEMAN, J. 1994. Learning strategies and exploratory behavior of interactive computer users. Ph.D. dissertation, Tech. Rep. CU-CS-723-94, Dept. of Computer Science, Univ. of Colorado, Boulder, Colo.
[28]
ROSSON, M. B. 1984. Effects of experience on learning, using, and evaluating a text-editor. Hum. Factors 26, 463-475.
[29]
SCHNEIDERMAN, B. 1983. Direct manipulation: A step beyond programming languages. IEEE Comput. 16, 8, 57-69.
[30]
SHRAGER, J. 1985. Instructionless learning: Discovery of the mental model of a complex device. Ph.D. dissertation, Carnegie-Mellon Univ., Pittsburgh, Pa. Unpublished.
[31]
SHRAGER,J.AND KLAHR, D. 1986. Instructionless learning about a complex device: The paradigm and observations. Int. J. Man Mach. Stud. 25, 153-189.
[32]
SUCHMAN, L. A. 1987. Plans and Situated Actions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England.
[33]
WHARTON, C., RIEMAN, J., LEWIS, C., AND POLSON, P. 1994. The cognitive walkthrough method: A practitioner's guide. In Usability Inspection Methods, J. Nielsen and R. L. Mack, Eds. John Wiley and Sons, New York.
[34]
WIXON, D., HOLTZBLATT, K., AND KNOX, S. 1990. Contextual design: An emergent view of system design. In Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, New York, 331-336.
[35]
WRIGHT, P. 1988. Issues of content and presentation in document design. In Handbook of Human-Computer Interaction, M. Helander, Ed. Elsevier (North-Holland), Amsterdam, 629-652.
[36]
WRIGHT,P.AND LICKORISH, A. 1994. Menus and memory load: Navigation strategies in interaction search tasks. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 40, 965-1008.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Tutorial mismatches: investigating the frictions due to interface differences when following software video tutorialsProceedings of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3643834.3661511(1942-1955)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
  • (2024)Older Adults' Collaborative Learning Dynamics When Exploring Feature-Rich SoftwareProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36373788:CSCW1(1-27)Online publication date: 26-Apr-2024
  • (2024)Do I Just Tap My Headset?Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies10.1145/36314517:4(1-28)Online publication date: 12-Jan-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction
ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction  Volume 3, Issue 3
Sept. 1996
97 pages
ISSN:1073-0516
EISSN:1557-7325
DOI:10.1145/234526
Issue’s Table of Contents

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 01 September 1996
Published in TOCHI Volume 3, Issue 3

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. diary studies
  2. discovery learning
  3. exploratory learning
  4. learning in the workplace
  5. learning on demand

Qualifiers

  • Article

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)373
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)64
Reflects downloads up to 16 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Tutorial mismatches: investigating the frictions due to interface differences when following software video tutorialsProceedings of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3643834.3661511(1942-1955)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
  • (2024)Older Adults' Collaborative Learning Dynamics When Exploring Feature-Rich SoftwareProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36373788:CSCW1(1-27)Online publication date: 26-Apr-2024
  • (2024)Do I Just Tap My Headset?Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies10.1145/36314517:4(1-28)Online publication date: 12-Jan-2024
  • (2023)Path to Sustainable Competitive Advantage with Use of Environmental, Social and Governance PrinciplesESG Law Review10.37497/esg.v6i1.15906:1(e01590)Online publication date: 7-Feb-2023
  • (2023)Learnability in Automated Driving (LiAD): Concepts for Applying Learnability Engineering (CALE) Based on Long-Term Learning EffectsInformation10.3390/info1410051914:10(519)Online publication date: 22-Sep-2023
  • (2023)From Discovery to Adoption: Understanding the ML Practitioners’ Interpretability JourneyProceedings of the 2023 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3563657.3596046(2304-2325)Online publication date: 10-Jul-2023
  • (2023)filtered.ink: Creating Dynamic Illustrations with SVG FiltersProceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3544548.3581051(1-15)Online publication date: 19-Apr-2023
  • (2023)A Systematic Literature Review on Computational Fashion WearablesInternational Journal of Human–Computer Interaction10.1080/10447318.2023.226900740:22(6913-6940)Online publication date: 6-Nov-2023
  • (2023)Moving Away from the Blocks: Evaluating the Usability of EduBlocks for Supporting Children to Transition from Block-Based ProgrammingHuman-Computer Interaction – INTERACT 202310.1007/978-3-031-42280-5_19(317-336)Online publication date: 28-Aug-2023
  • (2022)Co-Designing the User Experience of Location-Based Games for a Network of Museums: Involving Cultural Heritage Professionals and Local CommunitiesMultimodal Technologies and Interaction10.3390/mti60500366:5(36)Online publication date: 4-May-2022
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Login options

Full Access

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media