Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/2187836.2187954acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesthewebconfConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Micropinion generation: an unsupervised approach to generating ultra-concise summaries of opinions

Published: 16 April 2012 Publication History

Abstract

This paper presents a new unsupervised approach to generating ultra-concise summaries of opinions. We formulate the problem of generating such a micropinion summary as an optimization problem, where we seek a set of concise and non-redundant phrases that are readable and represent key opinions in text. We measure representativeness based on a modified mutual information function and model readability with an n-gram language model. We propose some heuristic algorithms to efficiently solve this optimization problem. Evaluation results show that our unsupervised approach outperforms other state of the art summarization methods and the generated summaries are informative and readable.

References

[1]
S. R. K. Branavan, H. Chen, J. Eisenstein, and R. Barzilay. Learning document-level semantic properties from free-text annotations. In In Proceedings of ACL, pages 263--271, 2008.
[2]
G. Carenini and J. C. K. Cheung. Extractive vs. nlg-based abstractive summarization of evaluative text: the effect of corpus controversiality. In Proceedings of the Fifth International Natural Language Generation Conference, INLG '08, pages 33--41, Stroudsburg, PA, USA, 2008. Association for Computational Linguistics.
[3]
G. Carenini, R. Ng, and A. Pauls. Multi-document summarization of evaluative text. In Proceedings of EACL '06, pages 305--312, 2006.
[4]
H. T. Dang. Overview of DUC 2005. In Document Understanding Conference, 2005.
[5]
K. Filippova. Multi-sentence compression: finding shortest paths in word graphs. In Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Computational Linguistics, COLING '10, pages 322--330, Stroudsburg, PA, USA, 2010. Association for Computational Linguistics.
[6]
E. Frank, G. W. Paynter, I. H. Witten, and C. Gutwin. Domainspecific keyphrase extraction. In Proc. Sixteenth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 668--673. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, 1999.
[7]
K. Ganesan, C. Zhai, and J. Han. Opinosis: A graph based approach to abstractive summarization of highly redundant opinions. In Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING), Beijing, China, 2010.
[8]
N. Gupta, G. Di Fabbrizio, and P. Haffner. Capturing the stars: predicting ratings for service and product reviews. In Proceedings of the NAACL HLT 2010 Workshop on Semantic Search, SS '10, pages 36--43, Stroudsburg, PA, USA, 2010. Association for Computational Linguistics.
[9]
M. Hu and B. Liu. Mining and summarizing customer reviews. In Proceedings of the tenth ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining, KDD '04, pages 168--177, New York, NY, USA, 2004. ACM.
[10]
H. D. Kim and C. Zhai. Generating comparative summaries of contradictory opinions in text. In Proceeding of the 18th ACM conference on Information and knowledge management, CIKM '09, pages 385--394, New York, NY, USA, 2009. ACM.
[11]
C.-Y. Lin. Rouge: a package for automatic evaluation of summaries. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Text Summarization Branches Out (WAS 2004), Barcelona, Spain, 2004.
[12]
B. Liu. Web data mining; Exploring hyperlinks, contents, and usage data. Springer, 2006.
[13]
B. Liu, M. Hu, and J. Cheng. Opinion observer: analyzing and comparing opinions on the web. In WWW '05: Proceedings of the 14th international conference on World Wide Web, pages 342--351, 2005.
[14]
Y. Lu, C. Zhai, and N. Sundaresan. Rated aspect summarization of short comments. In 18th International World Wide Web Conference (WWW2009), April 2009.
[15]
O. Medelyan and I. H. Witten. Domain-independent automatic keyphrase indexing with small training sets. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 59:1026--1040, May 2008.
[16]
B. Pang and L. Lee. Seeing stars: Exploiting class relationships for sentiment categorization with respect to rating scales. In Proceedings of the ACL, pages 115--124, 2005.
[17]
B. Pang, L. Lee, and S. Vaithyanathan. Thumbs up? Sentiment classification using machine learning techniques.
[18]
M. J. Paul, C. Zhai, and R. Girju. Summarizing contrastive viewpoints in opinionated text. In Proceedings of the 2010 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, EMNLP '10, pages 66--76, Stroudsburg, PA, USA, 2010. Association for Computational Linguistics.
[19]
J. Pei, J. Han, B. Mortazavi-Asl, J. Wang, H. Pinto, Q. Chen, U. Dayal, and M.-C. Hsu. Mining sequential patterns by pattern-growth: The prefixspan approach. IEEE Trans. on Knowl. and Data Eng., 16:1424--1440, November 2004.
[20]
D. Radev, H. Jing, and M. Budzikowska. Centroid-based summarization of multiple documents: Sentence extraction, utility-based evaluation, and user studies. In ANLP/NAACL Workshop on Summarization, pages 21--29, 2000.
[21]
R. Real and J. M. Vargas. The Probabilistic Basis of Jaccard's Index of Similarity. Systematic Biology, 45(3):380--385, 1996.
[22]
B. Snyder and R. Barzilay. Multiple aspect ranking using the good grief algorithm. In Proceedings of HLT-NAACL '07, pages 300--307, 2007.
[23]
E. Terra and C. L. A. Clarke. Frequency estimates for statistical word similarity measures. In Proceedings of the 2003 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics on Human Language Technology - Volume 1, NAACL '03, pages 165--172, Stroudsburg, PA, USA, 2003. Association for Computational Linguistics.
[24]
I. Titov and R. Mcdonald. A joint model of text and aspect ratings for sentiment summarization. In Proceedings of ACL-08: HLT, pages 308--316, Columbus, Ohio, June 2008. Association for Computational Linguistics.
[25]
T. Tomokiyo and M. Hurst. A language model approach to keyphrase extraction. In Proceedings of the ACL 2003 workshop on Multiword expressions: analysis, acquisition and treatment - Volume 18, pages 33--40, Morristown, NJ, USA, 2003. Association for Computational Linguistics.
[26]
P. D. Turney. Thumbs up or thumbs down?: semantic orientation applied to unsupervised classification of reviews. In Proceedings of ACL '02, pages 417--424, Stroudsburg, PA, USA, 2002. Association for Computational Linguistics.
[27]
H. Wang, Y. Lu, and C. Zhai. Latent aspect rating analysis on review text data: a rating regression approach. In Proceedings of KDD '10, pages 783--792, New York, NY, USA, 2010. ACM.
[28]
K. Wang, C. Thrasher, E. Viegas, X. Li, and B.-j. P. Hsu. An overview of microsoft web n-gram corpus and applications. In Proceedings of the NAACL HLT 2010 Demonstration Session, pages 45--48, Los Angeles, California, June 2010. Association for Computational Linguistics.
[29]
T. Wilson, J. Wiebe, and P. Hoffmann. Recognizing contextual polarity in phrase-level sentiment analysis. In Proceedings of the conference on Human Language Technology and Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, HLT '05, pages 347--354, Stroudsburg, PA, USA, 2005. Association for Computational Linguistics.
[30]
I. H. Witten, G. W. Paynter, E. Frank, C. Gutwin, and C. G. Nevill-Manning. Kea: practical automatic keyphrase extraction. In Proceedings of the fourth ACM conference on Digital libraries, DL '99, pages 254--255, New York, NY, USA, 1999. ACM.

Cited By

View all
  • (2022)Generating Characteristic Summaries for Entity DescriptionsIEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering10.1109/TKDE.2022.3144391(1-1)Online publication date: 2022
  • (2022)Customer Segmentation via Data Mining Techniques: State-of-the-Art ReviewComputational Intelligence in Data Mining10.1007/978-981-16-9447-9_38(489-507)Online publication date: 7-May-2022
  • (2021)Differentially Private String Sanitization for Frequency-Based Mining Tasks2021 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM)10.1109/ICDM51629.2021.00014(41-50)Online publication date: Dec-2021
  • Show More Cited By
  1. Micropinion generation: an unsupervised approach to generating ultra-concise summaries of opinions

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    WWW '12: Proceedings of the 21st international conference on World Wide Web
    April 2012
    1078 pages
    ISBN:9781450312295
    DOI:10.1145/2187836
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    • Univ. de Lyon: Universite de Lyon

    In-Cooperation

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 16 April 2012

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Conference

    WWW 2012
    Sponsor:
    • Univ. de Lyon
    WWW 2012: 21st World Wide Web Conference 2012
    April 16 - 20, 2012
    Lyon, France

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 1,899 of 8,196 submissions, 23%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)19
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2
    Reflects downloads up to 24 Sep 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2022)Generating Characteristic Summaries for Entity DescriptionsIEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering10.1109/TKDE.2022.3144391(1-1)Online publication date: 2022
    • (2022)Customer Segmentation via Data Mining Techniques: State-of-the-Art ReviewComputational Intelligence in Data Mining10.1007/978-981-16-9447-9_38(489-507)Online publication date: 7-May-2022
    • (2021)Differentially Private String Sanitization for Frequency-Based Mining Tasks2021 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM)10.1109/ICDM51629.2021.00014(41-50)Online publication date: Dec-2021
    • (2021)An Unsupervised Graph-Based Hybrid Approach for Opinion Summarization2021 18th International Computer Conference on Wavelet Active Media Technology and Information Processing (ICCWAMTIP)10.1109/ICCWAMTIP53232.2021.9674086(83-88)Online publication date: 17-Dec-2021
    • (2020)Augmented Reality and Mobile ConsumersManagerial Challenges and Social Impacts of Virtual and Augmented Reality10.4018/978-1-7998-2874-7.ch005(76-94)Online publication date: 2020
    • (2020)Sentiment aggregation of targeted features by capturing their dependencies: Making sense from customer reviewsInternational Journal of Information Management10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.10209753(102097)Online publication date: Aug-2020
    • (2020)RETRACTED ARTICLE: An abstractive summary generation system for customer reviews and news article using deep learningJournal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing10.1007/s12652-020-02412-112:7(7363-7373)Online publication date: 3-Aug-2020
    • (2019)Using Argumentative Semantic Feature for Summarization2019 IEEE 13th International Conference on Semantic Computing (ICSC)10.1109/ICOSC.2019.8665523(456-461)Online publication date: Jan-2019
    • (2018)Is it possible to describe television series from online comments?Journal of Internet Services and Applications10.1186/s13174-018-0096-19:1Online publication date: 15-Dec-2018
    • (2018)Review on Recent Advances in Information Mining From Big Consumer Opinion Data for Product DesignJournal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering10.1115/1.404108719:1Online publication date: 17-Sep-2018
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    Get Access

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media