Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
research-article

CS Unplugged and Middle-School Students’ Views, Attitudes, and Intentions Regarding CS

Published: 01 April 2012 Publication History

Abstract

Many students hold incorrect ideas and negative attitudes about computer science (CS). In order to address these difficulties, a series of learning activities called Computer Science Unplugged was developed by Tim Bell and his colleagues. These activities expose young people to central concepts in CS in an entertaining way without requiring a computer. The CS Unplugged activities have become more and more popular among CS educators and several activities are recommended in the ACM K-12 curriculum for elementary schools. CS Unplugged is used worldwide and has been translated into many languages.
We examined the effect of the CS Unplugged activities on middle-school students’ ideas about CS and their desire to consider and study it in high school. The results indicate that following the activities the ideas of the students on what CS is about were partially improved, but their desire to study CS lessened.
In order to provide possible explanations to these results, we analyzed the CS Unplugged activities to determine to what extent the objectives of CS Unplugged were addressed in the activities. In addition, we checked whether the activities were designed according to constructivist principles and whether they were explicitly linked to central concepts in CS. We found that only some of the objectives were addressed in the activities, that the activities do not engage with the students’ prior knowledge and that most of the activities are not explicitly linked to central concepts in CS. We offer suggestions for modifying the CS Unplugged activities so that they will be more likely to achieve their objectives.

References

[1]
ACM/IEEE. 2008. Computer science curriculum 2008: An interim revision of CS 2001. http://www.acm.org//education/curricula/ComputerScience2008.pdf.
[2]
Ajzen, I. 1991. The theory of planned behavior. Organiz. Behav. Human Decision Proces. 50, 179--211.
[3]
Ajzen, I. 2001. Nature and operations of attitudes. Ann. Rev. Psych. 52, 27--58.
[4]
Armoni, M. 2003. Teaching “computational models” in high schools. Ph.D. thesis. Tel-Aviv University.
[5]
Bell, T., Alexander, J., Freeman, I., and Grimley, M. 2009. Computer science unplugged: School students doing real computing without computers. NZ J. Appl. Comput. Inf. Tech. 13, 1, 20--29.
[6]
Bell, T., Wada, B. T., Kanemune, S., Xie, X., Lee, W.-G., Choi, S.-K., and Aspvall, B. 2008. Making computer science activities accessible for the languages and cultures of Japan, Korea, China, and Sweden. In Proceedings of the 39th SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE’08). 566.
[7]
Carter, L. 2006. Why students with an apparent aptitude for computer science don’t choose to major in computer science. SIGCSE Bull. 38, 1, 27--31.
[8]
Cassel, L. B., McGettrick, A., Guzdial, M., and Roberts, E. 2007. The current crisis in computing: What are the real issues? In Proceedings of the 38th Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE’07). 329--330.
[9]
Clement, J. 2008. The role of explanatory models in teaching for conceptual change. In International Handbook of Research on Conceptual Change, S. Vosniadou Ed., Routledge, 417--452.
[10]
Curzon, P. 2007. Serious fun in computer science. In Proceedings of the 12th Annual Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (ITiCSE’07). 1--1.
[11]
Curzon, P. and McOwan, P. W. 2008. Engaging with computer science through magic shows. In Proceedings of the 13th Annual Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (ITiCSE’08). 179--183.
[12]
Dijkstra, E. W. 1986. On a cultural gap. Math. Intellig. 8, 1, 48--52.
[13]
Feaster, Y., Segars, L., Wahba, S. K., and Hallstrom, J. O. 2011. Teaching CS unplugged in the high school (with limited success). In Proceedings of the 16th Annual Joint Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (ITiCSE’11). 248--252.
[14]
Foster, A. 2005. Student interest in computer science plummets. Chron. High. Educ. 51, 38, A31--A32.
[15]
Gal-Ezer, J., Shahak, D., and Zur, E. 2009. Computer science issues in high school: Gender and more . . . . SIGCSE Bull. 41, 3, 278--282.
[16]
Galpin, V. C. and Sanders, I. D. 2007. Perceptions of computer science at a South African university. Comput. Educ. 49, 4, 1330--1356.
[17]
Harel, D. 1991. Algorithmics, The Spirit of Computing. The Open University of Israel, Tel-Aviv, Israel.
[18]
Hirsch, L. S., Carpinelli, J. D., Kimmel, H., Rockland, R., and Bloom, J. 2007. The differential effects of pre-engineering curricula on middle school students’ attitudes to and knowledge of engineering careers. In Proceedings of the 37th Frontiers in Education Conference (ASEE/IEEE’07). S2B-17S2B-21.
[19]
Johnson, R. B. and Onwuegbuzie, A. J. 2004. A research paradigm whose time has come. Educ. Res. 33, 7, 14--26.
[20]
Kelleher, C. and Pausch, R. 2005. Lowering the barriers to programming: A taxonomy of programming environments and languages for novice programmers. ACM Comput. Surv. 37, 2, 83--137.
[21]
Lambert, L. and Guiffre, H. 2009. Computer science outreach in an elementary school. J. Comput. Small Coll. 24, 3, 118--124.
[22]
Linn, M. and Eylon, B. 2006. Science education: Integrating views of learning and instruction. In Handbook of Educational Psychology. E. Anderman, P. H. Winne, P. A. Alexander, and L. Corno Eds., Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 511--544.
[23]
Mano, C., Allan, V., and Cooley, D. 2010. Effective in-class activities for middle school outreach programs. In Proceedings of the Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE’10). F2E-1-F2E-6.
[24]
Martin, C. D. 2004. Draw a computer scientist. In Working Group Reports on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (ITiCSE-WGR’04). 11--12.
[25]
Mitchell, A., Purchase, H. C., and Hamer, J. 2009. Computing science: What do pupils think? In Proceedings of the 14th Annual Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (ITiCSE’09). 353--353.
[26]
Moorman, P. and Johnson, E. 2003. Still a stranger here: Attitudes among secondary school students towards computer science. In Proceedings of the 8th Annual Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (ITiCSE’03). 193--197.
[27]
Moskal, B., Lurie, D., and Cooper, S. 2004. Evaluating the effectiveness of a new instructional approach. SIGCSE Bull. 36, 1, 75--79.
[28]
Nishida, T., Idosaka, Y., Hofuku, Y., Kanemune, S., and Kuno, Y. 2008. New methodology of information education with Computer Science Unplugged. In Proceedings of the 3rd ISSEP Conference, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 5090 (ISSEP’08). 241--252.
[29]
Perkins, D. 1995. Smart Schools: Better Thinking and Learning for Every Child. Free Press, New York.
[30]
Perrenet, J., Groote, J. F., and Kaasenbrood, E. 2005. Exploring students’ understanding of the concept of algorithm: Levels of abstraction. In Proceedings of the 10th Annual Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (ITiCSE’05). 64--68.
[31]
Roberts, E. S. 2011. Meeting the challenges of rising enrollments. ACM Inroads 2, 4--6.
[32]
Taub, R., Ben-Ari, M., and Armoni, M. 2009. The effect of CS unplugged on middle-school students’ views of CS. In Proceedings of the 14th Annual Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (ITiCSE’09). 99--103.
[33]
Tucker, A., Deek, F., Jones, J., McCowan, D., Stephenson, C., and Verno, A. 2006. A Model Curriculum for K-12 Computer Science: Final Report of the ACM K-12 Task Force Curriculum Committee 2nd Ed. ACM, New York.
[34]
Wick, M. R. 2007. Bridging the conceptual gap: Assessing the impact on student attitudes toward programming. SIGCSE Bull. 39, 1, 509--513.
[35]
Wing, J. M. 2006. Computational thinking. Comm. ACM 49, 3, 33--35.
[36]
Yardi, S. and Bruckman, A. 2007. What is computing?: Bridging the gap between teenagers’ perceptions and graduate students’ experiences. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Computing Education Research (ICER’07). 39--50.
[37]
Zohar, A. and Sela, D. 2003. Her physics, his physics: Gender issues in Israeli advanced placement physics classes. Int. J. Sci. Educ. 25, 2, 245--268.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Advancing Equity and Access: Addressing the Side Effects of Broadening Participation in Computer Science K–12 EducationReview of Research in Education10.3102/0091732X24128647548:1(121-153)Online publication date: 28-Oct-2024
  • (2024)Teaching the Bubble Sort Algorithm Using CS Unplugged Activities at the K-12 LevelACM Transactions on Computing Education10.1145/370612025:1(1-22)Online publication date: 28-Nov-2024
  • (2024)Fostering AI Literacy with LuminAI through Embodiment and Creativity in Informal Learning SpacesProceedings of the 16th Conference on Creativity & Cognition10.1145/3635636.3664255(476-481)Online publication date: 23-Jun-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. CS Unplugged and Middle-School Students’ Views, Attitudes, and Intentions Regarding CS

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Transactions on Computing Education
    ACM Transactions on Computing Education  Volume 12, Issue 2
    April 2012
    133 pages
    EISSN:1946-6226
    DOI:10.1145/2160547
    Issue’s Table of Contents
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 01 April 2012
    Accepted: 01 January 1996
    Revised: 01 November 1993
    Received: 01 February 1986
    Published in TOCE Volume 12, Issue 2

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. Computer science unplugged
    2. K-12 instruction
    3. attitudes
    4. views

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)75
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)6
    Reflects downloads up to 08 Feb 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)Advancing Equity and Access: Addressing the Side Effects of Broadening Participation in Computer Science K–12 EducationReview of Research in Education10.3102/0091732X24128647548:1(121-153)Online publication date: 28-Oct-2024
    • (2024)Teaching the Bubble Sort Algorithm Using CS Unplugged Activities at the K-12 LevelACM Transactions on Computing Education10.1145/370612025:1(1-22)Online publication date: 28-Nov-2024
    • (2024)Fostering AI Literacy with LuminAI through Embodiment and Creativity in Informal Learning SpacesProceedings of the 16th Conference on Creativity & Cognition10.1145/3635636.3664255(476-481)Online publication date: 23-Jun-2024
    • (2024)Testing, Socializing, Exploring: Characterizing Middle Schoolers’ Approaches to and Conceptions of ChatGPTProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642332(1-17)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
    • (2024)Using multimodal learning analytics to understand effects of block‐based and text‐based modalities on computer programmingJournal of Computer Assisted Learning10.1111/jcal.1293940:3(1123-1136)Online publication date: 9-Jan-2024
    • (2024)The effect of computer science unplugged on abstraction as a sub-component of computational thinkingThinking Skills and Creativity10.1016/j.tsc.2024.10155253(101552)Online publication date: Sep-2024
    • (2024)Block-based versus text-based programming: a comparison of learners’ programming behaviors, computational thinking skills and attitudes toward programmingEducational technology research and development10.1007/s11423-023-10328-8Online publication date: 2-Jan-2024
    • (2024)Computational thinking with game design: An action research study with middle school studentsEducation and Information Technologies10.1007/s10639-024-13010-5Online publication date: 17-Sep-2024
    • (2024)Introduction to informatics in a Peruvian penitentiary using cs unplugged: from university to penitentiaryEducation and Information Technologies10.1007/s10639-023-12336-w29:1(971-989)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2024
    • (2024)The effect on computational thinking and identified learning aspects: Comparing unplugged smartGames with SRA-Programming with tangible or On-screen outputEducation and Information Technologies10.1007/s10639-023-11956-629:3(2999-3024)Online publication date: 1-Feb-2024
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    Login options

    Full Access

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Figures

    Tables

    Media

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media