Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
research-article

Exploring Traditional Phones as an E-Mail Interface for Older Adults

Published: 13 January 2016 Publication History

Abstract

This article explores the design and development of voice interfaces via traditional telephones as a way of supporting asynchronous online communication for older adults. E-mail is the primary form of online communication for older adults. However, e-mail communication currently requires access to and the ability to use an Internet-connected computer or device, which may be problematic due to barriers of physical access, expense, insufficient computer skill, or other accessibility issues. To address this, the present work leverages the pervasive hardware of traditional phones and familiar nonvisual models of phone-based interaction to create a new e-mail interface for older adults. We examine the potential of e-mail interaction via traditional phones through long-term field observations, prototype testing, and a four-week field-based user study. Our findings indicate that a simple voice e-mail interface accessed through traditional phones is usable for older adults and is a useful way for offline older adults to interact with an e-mail account. The ease of use and convenience of a phone-based interface are important given the “work” of keeping in touch over e-mail, and this approach has the potential to open up new avenues of online access for older adults who are still offline or who have late-life disabilities that make using traditional graphical e-mail systems difficult. This project contributes new insights regarding the ways in which voice interfaces can support asynchronous online communication for older adults and provides design guidance for the development of subsequent voice interfaces.

References

[1]
Aging in Place Technology Watch. 2011. Technology Survey Age 65 to 100. Retrieved from http://www.ageinplacetech.com.
[2]
Nuno Baptista, Rui Prior, and Manuel E. Correia. 2009. Telephone interface for the email service. In Future Computing, Service Computation, Cognitive, Adaptive, Content, Patterns (COMPUTATIONWORLD'09). Computation World. IEEE, 437--442.
[3]
Michael T. Braun. 2013. Obstacles to social networking website use among older adults. Computers in Human Behavior 29, 3 (2013), 673--680.
[4]
Kathy Charmaz. 2000. Grounded theory: Objectivist and constructivist methods. In Handbook of Qualitative Research, 2nd ed., N. Denzin and Y. Lincoln (Eds.). Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, 509--535.
[5]
Raymundo Cornejo, Mónica Tentori, and Jesús Favela. 2013. Ambient awareness to strengthen the family social network of older adults. Computer Supported Cooperative Work 22, 2--3 (2013), 309--344.
[6]
Erin Cornwell and Linda Waite. 2009. Measuring social isolation among older adults using multiple indicators from the NSHAP study. Journal of Gerontol 64B (2009), i38--i46. Issue suppl_1.
[7]
Shelia R. Cotten, George Ford, Sherry Ford, and Timothy M. Hale. 2012. Internet use and depression among older adults. Computers in Human Behavior 28, 2 (2012), 496--499.
[8]
Sara Czaja, Neil Charness, Arthur D. Fisk, Christopher Hertzog, Sankaran N. Nair, Wendy Rogers, and Joseph Sharit. 2006. Factors predicting the use of technology: Findings from the center for research and education on aging and technology enhancement (CREATE). Psychology and Aging 21 (2006), 333--352. Issue 2.
[9]
Fred D. Davis, Richard P. Bagozzi, and Paul R. Warshaw. 1989. User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science 35 (1989), 982--1003.
[10]
Anna Dickinson and Robin L. Hill. 2007. Keeping in touch: Talking to older people about computers and communication. Education and Gerontology (2007), 613--630. Issue 33.
[11]
Anna Dickinson, Allan F. Newell, Michael J. Smith, and Robin L. Hill. 2005. Introducing the internet to the over-60s: Developing an email system for older novice computer users. Interacive Computing 17, 6 (2005), 621--642.
[12]
Sara Ferlander. 2007. The importance of different forms of social capital for health. Acta Sociologica 50 (2007), 115--128.
[13]
Arthur D. Fisk, Wendy A. Rogers, Neil Charness, Sara J. Czaja, and Joseph Sharit. 2009. Designing for Older Adults: Principles and Creative Human Factors Approaches.
[14]
Vaibhav Garg, Lesa Lorenzen-Huber, L. Jean Camp, and Kay Connelly. 2012. Risk communication design for older adults. ISG* ISARC. Retrieved from http://www.ljean.com/files/RiskOlderAdults.pdf.
[15]
Vicki L. Hanson. 2009. Age and web access: The next generation. In Proceedings of the W4A. ACM, 7--15. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1535658
[16]
Nic Hollinworth and Faustina Hwang. 2011. Investigating familiar interactions to help older adults learn computer applications more easily. In Proceedings of CHI.
[17]
Alexis Hope, Ted Schwaba, and Anne Marie Piper. 2014. Understanding digital and material social communications for older adults. In Proceedings of CHI. 3903--3912.
[18]
Juan Pablo Hourcade, Christopher M. Nguyen, Keith B. Perry, and Natalie L. Denburg. 2010. Pointassist for older adults: Analyzing sub-movement characteristics to aid in pointing tasks. In Proceedings of CHI. 1115--1124.
[19]
Eun Ju Lee, Clifford Nass, and Scott Brave. 2000. Can computer-generated speech have gender?: An experimental test of gender stereotype. In Ext Abs of CHI.
[20]
Siân E. Lindley. 2012. Shades of lightweight: Supporting cross-generational communication through home messaging. Universal Access in the Information Society 11, 1 (2012), 31--43.
[21]
Siân E. Lindley, Richard Harper, and Abigail Sellen. 2008. Designing for elders: Exploring the complexity of relationships in later life. In Proceedings of BCS-HCI. 77--86.
[22]
Siân E. Lindley, Richard Harper, and Abigail Sellen. 2009. Desiring to be in touch in a changing communications landscape: Attitudes of older adults. In Proceedings of CHI. 1693--1702.
[23]
Lorna Lines and Kate S. Hone. 2002. Older adults’ evaluations of speech output. In Proceedings of ASSETS. New York, NY, 170--177.
[24]
R. C. Littell, G. A. Milliken, W. W. Stroup, and R. D. Wolfinger. 1996. SAS System for Mixed Models. 633 pp. pages.
[25]
James Lubben and Melanie Gironda. 2003. Centrality of social ties to the health and well-being of older adults. In Social Work and Health Care in an Aging Society: Education, Policy, Practice, and Research. Springer.
[26]
Tracy L. Mitzner, Julie B. Boron, Cara Bailey Fausset, Anne E. Adams, Neil Charness, Sara J. Czaja, Katinka Dijkstra, Arthur D. Fisk, Wendy A. Rogers, and Joseph Sharit. 2010. Older adults talk technology: Technology usage and attitudes. Computers in Human Behavior 26, 6 (2010), 1710--1721. Online Interactivity: Role of Technology in Behavior Change.
[27]
Karyn Moffatt, Jessica David, and Ronald M. Baecker. 2012. Connecting grandparents and grandchildren. In Connecting Families: The Impact of New Communication Technologies on Domestic Life, Carman Neustaedter, Steve Harrison, and Abigail Sellen (Eds.). Springer, 173--193.
[28]
Clifford Nass and Scott Brave. 2005. Wired for Speech: How Voice Activates and Advances the Human-Computer Relationship. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
[29]
Chris Norval, John L. Arnott, and Vicki L. Hanson. 2014. What’s on your mind?: Investigating recommendations for inclusive social networking and older adults. In Proceedings of CHI. 3923--3932.
[30]
Neil Patel, Sheetal Agarwal, Nitendra Rajput, Amit Nanavati, Paresh Dave, and Tapan S. Parikh. 2009. A comparative study of speech and dialed input voice interfaces in rural india. In Proceedings of CHI. 51--54.
[31]
Paul Resnick. 1992. HyperVoice: A phone-based CSCW platform. In Proceedings of CSCW. 218--225.
[32]
Nithya Sambasivan, Julie Weber, and Edward Cutrell. 2011. Designing a phone broadcasting system for urban sex workers in India. In Proceedings of CHI. 267--276.
[33]
Sergio Sayago and Josep Blat. 2010. Telling the story of older people e-mailing: An ethnographical study. International Journal of Human Computer Studies 68, 1--2 (2010), 105--120.
[34]
Chris Schmandt. 1993. Phoneshell: The telephone as computer terminal. In Proceedings of ICME (MULTIMEDIA’93). 373--382.
[35]
Aaron Smith. 2014. Older adults and technology use. Pew Research Center.
[36]
Shima Sum, R. Mark Mathews, Ian Hughes, and Andrew Campbell. 2008. Internet use and loneliness in older adults. Cyberpsychology and Behavior 11 (2008). Issue 2.
[37]
S. Shyam Sundar, Anne Oeldorf-Hirsch, Jon Nussbaum, and Richard Behr. 2011. Retirees on Facebook: Can online social networking enhance their health and wellness? In Proceedings of CHI. 2287--2292.
[38]
Maria Wolters, Kallirroi Georgila, Johanna D. Moore, Robert H. Logie, Sarah E. MacPherson, and Matthew Watson. 2009b. Reducing working memory load in spoken dialogue systems. Interactive Computing 21, 4 (Aug. 2009), 276--287.
[39]
Maria Wolters, Kallirroi Georgila, Johanna D. Moore, and Sarah E. Macpherson. 2009a. Being old doesn’t mean acting old: How older users interact with spoken dialog systems. ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing 2, 1 (2009).
[40]
World Health Organization. 2015. Definition of an older or elderly person. Retrieved from http://www.who.int/healthinfo/survey/ageingdefnolder/en/.
[41]
Kathryn Zickuhr, Lee Rainie, Kristen Purcell, and Maeve Duggan. 2013. How Americans value public libraries in their communities. Retrieved from http://pewrsr.ch/1d8eKBD.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Examining Voice Community UseACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction10.1145/363515131:2(1-29)Online publication date: 5-Feb-2024
  • (2024)Designing to Support Blind and Visually Impaired Older Adults in Managing the Invisible Labor of Social Participation: Opportunities and ChallengesProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642203(1-14)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
  • (2024)The interaction design of 3D virtual humans: A surveyComputer Science Review10.1016/j.cosrev.2024.10065353(100653)Online publication date: Aug-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing
ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing  Volume 8, Issue 2
January 2016
74 pages
ISSN:1936-7228
EISSN:1936-7236
DOI:10.1145/2878628
Issue’s Table of Contents
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 13 January 2016
Accepted: 01 October 2015
Revised: 01 August 2015
Received: 01 April 2015
Published in TACCESS Volume 8, Issue 2

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Older adults
  2. communication
  3. e-mail
  4. telephones

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Research
  • Refereed

Funding Sources

  • National Science Foundation

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)47
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)5
Reflects downloads up to 18 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Examining Voice Community UseACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction10.1145/363515131:2(1-29)Online publication date: 5-Feb-2024
  • (2024)Designing to Support Blind and Visually Impaired Older Adults in Managing the Invisible Labor of Social Participation: Opportunities and ChallengesProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642203(1-14)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
  • (2024)The interaction design of 3D virtual humans: A surveyComputer Science Review10.1016/j.cosrev.2024.10065353(100653)Online publication date: Aug-2024
  • (2024)Understanding voice‐based information uncertaintyJournal of the Association for Information Science and Technology10.1002/asi.2485475:10(1041-1057)Online publication date: 12-Sep-2024
  • (2023)Enhancing Email Accessibility for Visually Impaired IndividualsJournal of Computers, Mechanical and Management10.57159/gadl.jcmm.2.4.230692:4(01-08)Online publication date: 30-Sep-2023
  • (2023)Envisioning Equitable Speech Technologies for Black Older AdultsProceedings of the 2023 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency10.1145/3593013.3594005(379-388)Online publication date: 12-Jun-2023
  • (2023)Exploring Tangible User Interface Design for Social Connection Among Older Adults: A Preliminary ReviewExtended Abstracts of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3544549.3585722(1-9)Online publication date: 19-Apr-2023
  • (2023)CUI@CHI: Inclusive Design of CUIs Across Modalities and MobilitiesExtended Abstracts of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3544549.3573820(1-5)Online publication date: 19-Apr-2023
  • (2022)Managing Perceived Loneliness and Social-Isolation Levels for Older Adults: A Survey with Focus on Wearables-Based SolutionsSensors10.3390/s2203110822:3(1108)Online publication date: 1-Feb-2022
  • (2022)SynapseProceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies10.1145/35503216:3(1-24)Online publication date: 7-Sep-2022
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

Full Access

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media