research-article

A survey of trust in social networks

Authors:

Wanita Sherchan,

Cecile ParisAuthors Info & Claims

ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), Volume 45, Issue 4

Article No.: 47, Pages 1 - 33

https://doi.org/10.1145/2501654.2501661

Published: 30 August 2013 Publication History

Abstract

Web-based social networks have become popular as a medium for disseminating information and connecting like-minded people. The public accessibility of such networks with the ability to share opinions, thoughts, information, and experience offers great promise to enterprises and governments. In addition to individuals using such networks to connect to their friends and families, governments and enterprises have started exploiting these platforms for delivering their services to citizens and customers. However, the success of such attempts relies on the level of trust that members have with each other as well as with the service provider. Therefore, trust becomes an essential and important element of a successful social network. In this article, we present the first comprehensive review of social and computer science literature on trust in social networks. We first review the existing definitions of trust and define social trust in the context of social networks. We then discuss recent works addressing three aspects of social trust: trust information collection, trust evaluation, and trust dissemination. Finally, we compare and contrast the literature and identify areas for further research in social trust.

References

[1]

Abdul-Rahman, A. and Hailes, S. 2000. Supporting trust in virtual communities. In Proceedings of the 33^rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'00). IEEE Computer Society, 1--9.

Digital Library

[2]

Adali, S., Escriva, R., Goldberg, M. K., Hayvanovych, M., Magdon-Ismail, M., Szymanski, B. K., Wallace, W. A., and Williams, G. 2010. Measuring behavioral trust in social networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Intelligence and Security Informatics (ISI'10). 150--152.

[3]

Alesina, A. and La Ferrara, E. 2002. Who trusts others&quest; J. Public Econ. 85, 1, 207--234.

[4]

Andersen, R., Borgs, C., Chayes, J., Feige, U., Flaxman, A., Kalai, A., Mirrokni, V., and Tennenholtz, M. 2008. Trust-based recommendation systems: An axiomatic approach. In Proceeding of the 17^th International Conference on World Wide Web (WWW'08). ACM Press, New York, 199--208.

Digital Library

[5]

Artz, D. and Gil, Y. 2007. A survey of trust in computer science and the semantic web. Web Semantics 5, 2, 58--71.

Digital Library

[6]

Azer, M. A., El-Kassas, S. M., Hassan, A. W. F., and El-Soudani, M. S. 2008. A survey on trust and reputation schemes in ad hoc networks. In Proceedings of the 3^rd International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos, CA, 881--886.

Digital Library

[7]

Barnes, J. A. 1954. Class and committees in a norwegian island parish. Hum. Relat. 7, 1, 39--54.

[8]

Beatty, P., Reay, I., Dick, S., and Miller, J. 2011. Consumer trust in e-commerce web sites: A metastudy. ACM Comput. Surv. 43, 3, 1--46.

Digital Library

[9]

Bimrah, K. K., Mouratidis, H., and Preston, D. 2008. Modelling trust requirements by means of a visualization language. In Proceedings of the Conference on Requirements Engineering Visualization (REV'08). IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos, CA, 26--30.

Digital Library

[10]

Boltzmann, L. 1964. Lectures on Gas Theory. Translated by Stephen G. Brush. University of California Press, Berkeley.

[11]

Brunie, A. 2009. Meaningful distinctions within a concept: Relational, collective, and generalized social capital. Social Sci. Res. 38, 2, 251--265.

[12]

Buskens, V. 1998. The social structure of trust. Social Netw. 20, 3, 265--289.

[13]

Castelfranchi, C., Conte, R., and Paolucci, M. 1998. Normative reputation and the costs of compliance. J. Artif. Soc. Social Simul. 1, 3.

[14]

Caverlee, J., Liu, L., and Webb, S. 2008. Socialtrust: Tamper-resilient trust establishment in online communities. In Proceedings of the 8^th ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Conference on Digital Libraries (JCDL'08). ACM Press, New York, 104--114.

Digital Library

[15]

Challener, D., Yoder, K., Catherman, R., Safford, D., and Van Doorn, L. 2007. A Practical Guide to Trusted Computing. 1^st Ed. IBM Press.

Digital Library

[16]

Chang, E., Dillon, T. S., and Hussain, F. 2006. Trust and Reputation for Service-Oriented Environments: Technologies for Building Business Intelligence and Consumer Confidence. Wiley Periodicals.

Digital Library

[17]

Chen, H.-C. and Chen, A. L. P. 2001. A music recommendation system based on music data grouping and user interests. In Proceedings of the 10^th International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM'01). ACM Press, New York, 231--238.

Digital Library

[18]

Chen, L. and Li, J. 2010. Revocation of direct anonymous attestation. In Proceedings of the 2^nd International Conference on Trusted Systems (INTRUST'10). 128--147.

Digital Library

[19]

Christianson, B. and Harbison, W. 1996. Why isn't trust transitive&quest; In Proceedings of the Security Protocols Workshop. 171--176.

Digital Library

[20]

Claridge, T. 2004. Social capital and natural resource management. M.S. thesis, Australia. http://www. socialcapitalresearch.com/literature/nrm.html.

[21]

Coleman, J. S. 1988. Social capital in the creation of human capital. Amer. J. Sociology 94, 1, 95--120.

[22]

Coleman, J. S. 1990. Foundations of Social Theory. Belknap Press, Cambridge, MA.

[23]

Cook, K. S., Yamagishi, T., Cheshire, C., Cooper, R., Matsuda, M., and Mashima, R. 2005. Trust building via risk taking: A cross-societal experiment. Social Psychol. Quart. 2, 68, 121--142.

[24]

Coulter, K. S. and Coulter, R. A. 2002. Determinants of trust in a service provider: The moderating role of length of relationship. J. Service. Market. 16, 1, 35--50.

[25]

Dohmen, T., Falk, A., Huffman, D., and Sunde, U. 2006. The intergenerational transmission of risk and trust attitudes. IZA working paper. http://www.cens.uni-bonn.de/team/board/armin-falk/the-intergenerational-transmission-of-risk-and-trust-attitudes-review-of-economic-studies-2012-792-645-677-with-thomas-dohmen-david-huffman-and-uwe-sunde&nldr;pdf.

[26]

Dumouchel, P. 2005. Trust as an action. Euro. J. Sociol. 46, 417--428.

[27]

Dwyer, C., Hiltz, S. R., and Passerini, K. 2007. Trust and privacy concern within social networking sites: A comparison of facebook and myspace. In Proceedings of the 13^th Americas Conference on Information Systems.

[28]

Elsalamouny, E., Sassone, V., and Nielsen, M. 2010. HMM-based trust model. In Proceedings of the 6^th International Workshop on Formal Aspects on Security and Trust (FAST'09). Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 5983, Springer, 21--35.

Digital Library

[29]

Fukuyama, F. 1995. Trust: The Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity. Free Press, New York.

[30]

Gilbert, E. and Karahalios, K. 2009. Predicting tie strength with social media. In Proceedings of the 27^th International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'09). ACM Press, New York, NY, 211--220.

Digital Library

[31]

Golbeck, J. 2005a. Personalizing applications through integration of inferred trust values in semantic web-based social networks. In Proceedings of the Semantic Network Analysis Workshop at the 4^th International Semantic Web Conference.

[32]

Golbeck, J. 2006a. Combining provenance with trust in social networks for semantic web content filtering. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Provenance and Annotation of Data (IPAW'06). L. Moreau and I. Foster, Eds., Lecture Notes in Computer Science Series, vol. 4145, Springer, 101--108.

Digital Library

[33]

Golbeck, J. 2006b. Trust on the world wide web: A survey. Found. Trends Web Sci. 1, 2, 131--197.

Digital Library

[34]

Golbeck, J. 2007. The dynamics of web-based social networks: Membership, relationships, and change. First Monday 12, 11.

[35]

Golbeck, J., Parsia, B., and Hendler, J. 2003. Trust networks on the semantic web. In Proceedings of the 7^th International Workshop on Cooperative Intelligent Agents. 238--249.

[36]

Golbeck, J. A. 2005b. Computing and applying trust in web-based social networks. Ph.D. thesis, University of Maryland at College Park, MD.

Digital Library

[37]

Grandison, T. and Sloman, M. 2000. A survey of trust in internet applications. IEEE Comm. Surv. Tutorials 3, 4.

Digital Library

[38]

Granovetter, M. 1973. The strength of weak ties. Amer. J. Sociology 78, 1360--1380.

[39]

Granovetter, M. 1985. Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. Amer. J. Sociol. 91, 481--510.

[40]

Gross, R. and Acquisti, A. 2005. Information revelation and privacy in online social networks. In Proceedings of the ACM Workshop on Privacy in the Electronic Society (WPES'05). ACM Press, New York, 71--80.

Digital Library

[41]

Guerriero, A., Kubicki, S., and Halin, G. 2009. Trust-oriented multi-visualization of cooperation context. In Proceedings of the 2^nd International Conference in Visualisation (VIZ'09). IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos, CA 96--101.

Digital Library

[42]

Hanchard, S. 2008. Measuring trust and social networks - Where do we put our trust online&quest; Hitwise. http://weblogs.hitwise.com/sandra-hanchard/2008/09/measuring_trust_and_social_net.html.

[43]

Hang, W. C. and Singh, M. P. 2010. Trust based recommendation based on graph similarities. http://www.csc. ncsu.edu/faculty/mpsingh/papers/mas/aamas-trust-10-graph.pdf.

[44]

Haythornthwaite, C. 2005. Social networks and internet connectivity effects. Inf. Comm. Soc. 8, 2, 125--147.

[45]

Helbing, D. 1994. A mathematical model for the behavior of individuals in a social field. J. Math. Sociol. 19, 3, 189--219.

[46]

Helbing, D. 1992. A mathematical model for attitude formation by pair interactions. Behav. Sci. 37, 3, 190--214.

Digital Library

[47]

Herlocker, J. L., Konstan, J. A., and Riedl, J. 2000. Explaining collaborative filtering recommendations. In Proceedings of ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW'00). 241--250.

Digital Library

[48]

Hess, C. 2006. Trust-based recommendations for publications: A multi-layer network approach. IEEE Tech. Commit. Digital Librar. Bull. 2, 2.

[49]

Hess, C. 2008. Trust-based recommendations in multi-layer networks. Ph.D. thesis, Otto-Friedrich University Bamberg/University Paris-Sud.

[50]

Hoffman, K., Zage, D., and Nita-Rotaru, C. 2009. A survey of attack and defense techniques for reputation systems. ACM Comput. Surv. 42, 1--31.

Digital Library

[51]

Holmes, J. 1991. Trust and the appraisal process in close relationships. In Advances in Personal Relationships, W. Jones and D. Perlman, Eds., Jessica Kingsley, London, 57--104.

[52]

Huang, F. 2007. Building social trust: A human-capital approach. J. Institut. Theor. Econ. 163, 4, 552--573.

[53]

Hughes, D., Coulson, G., and Walkerdine, J. 2005. Free riding on gnutella revisited: The bell tolls&quest; IEEE Distrib. Syst. Online 6, 6, 1.

Digital Library

[54]

Humphreys, L. 2007. Mobile social networks and social practice: A case study of dodgeball. J. Comput.-Mediated Comm. 13, 1, 341--360.

Digital Library

[55]

Huynh, T. D., Jennings, N. R., and Shadbolt, N. R. 2006. Certified reputation: How an agent can trust a stranger. In Proceedings of the 5^th International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS'06). New York, NY, 1217--1224.

Digital Library

[56]

Jackson, P. J. 1999. Virtual Working: Social and Organisational Dynamics. Routledge, New York.

Digital Library

[57]

Jaeger, P. T., Shneiderman, B., Fleischmann, K. R., Preece, J., Qu, Y., and Wu, P. F. 2007. Community response grids: E-government, social networks, and effective emergency management. Telecomm. Policy 31, 10--11, 592--604.

Digital Library

[58]

Jamieson, K. and Cappella, J. 2009. Echo Chamber: Rush Limbaugh and the Conservative Media Establishment. Oxford University Press.

[59]

Johnson, D. and Grayson, K. 2005. Cognitive and affective trust in service relationships. J. Bus. Res. 58, 4, 500--507.

[60]

Jones, K. 1996. Trust as an affective attitude. Ethics 107, 1, 4--25.

[61]

Josang, A. 2001. A logic for uncertain probabilities. Int. J. Uncert., Fuzzin. Knowl.-Based Syst. 9, 3, 279--311.

Digital Library

[62]

Josang, A. and Golbeck, J. 2009. Challenges for robust trust and reputation systems. In Proceedings of the 5^th International Workshop on Security and Trust Management (STM'09).

[63]

Josang, A., Gray, E., and Kinateder, M. 2003. Analysing topologies of transitive trust. In Proceedings of the 1^st Workshop on Formal Aspects in Security and Trust (FAST'03). 9--22.

[64]

Josang, A., Hayward, R., and Pope, S. 2006. Trust network analysis with subjective logic. In Proceedings of the 29^th Australasian Computer Science Conference (ACSC'06). Australian Computer Society, Hobart, Australia, 85--94.

Digital Library

[65]

Josang, A. and Ismail, R. 2002. The beta reputation system. In Proceedings of the 15^th Bled Conference on Electronic Commerce. 891--900.

[66]

Josang, A., Ismail, R., and Boyd, C. 2007. A survey of trust and reputation systems for online service provision. Decis. Support Syst. 43, 2, 618--644.

Digital Library

[67]

Jurca, R. and Faltings, B. 2003. An incentive compatible reputation mechanism. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on E-Commerce (CEC'03). 396--409.

[68]

Kamvar, S. D., Schlosser, M. T., and Garcia-Molina, H. 2003. The eigentrust algorithm for reputation management in p2p networks. In Proceedings of the 12^th International Conference on World Wide Web (WWW'03). ACM Press, New York, 640--651.

Digital Library

[69]

Kautz, H., Selman, B., and Shah, M. 1997. Referral web: Combining social networks and collaborative filtering. Comm. ACM 40, 63--65.

Digital Library

[70]

Keith, S. and Coulter, R. A. C. 2002. Determinants of trust in a service provider: The moderating role of length of relationship. J. Services Market. 16, 1, 35--50.

[71]

Kerr, R. and Cohen, R. 2009. Smart cheaters do prosper: Defeating trust and reputation systems. In Proceedings of the 8^th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS'09). Vol. 2, 993--1000.

Digital Library

[72]

Kim, Y. A. 2008. Building a web of trust without explicit trust ratings. In Proceedings of the 24^th IEEE International Conference on Data Engineering Workshop. 531--536.

[73]

Kleinfeld, J. 2002. The small world problem. Soc. Social Sci. Public Policy 39, 61--66.

[74]

Klos, T. B. and La Poutre, H. 2005. Decentralized reputation-based trust for assessing agent reliability under aggregate feedback. In Trusting Agents for Trusting Electronic Societies, Springer, 10--128.

Digital Library

[75]

Kollock, P. 1994. The emergence of exchange structures: An experimental study of uncertainty, commitment, and trust. Amer. J. Sociol. 100, 2, 313--345.

[76]

Komiak, S. X. and Benbasat, I. 2004. Understanding customer trust in agent-mediated electronic commerce, web-mediated electronic commerce, and traditional commerce. Inf. Technol. Manag. 5, 181--207.

Digital Library

[77]

Kuan, H. and Bock, G. 2005. The collective reality of trust: An investigation of social relations and networks on trust in multi-channel retailers. In Proceedings of the 13^th European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS'05).

[78]

Kuter, U. and Golbeck, J. 2007. Sunny: A new algorithm for trust inference in social networks using probabilistic confidence models. In Proceedings of the 22^nd National Conference on Artificial Intelligence. AAAI Press, 1377--1382.

Digital Library

[79]

Lawler, E. J. and Yoon, J. 1996. Commitment in exchange relations: Test of a theory of relational cohesion. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 61, 89--108.

[80]

Lazarsfeld, P. and Merton, R. 1954. Friendship as a social process: A substantive and methodological analysis. In Freedom and Control in Modern Society, M. Berger, T. Abel, and C. H. Page, Eds., Van Nostrand, New York, 18--66.

[81]

Levin, D. Z., Cross, R., and Abrams, L. C. 2004. The strength of weak ties you can trust: The mediating role of trust in effective knowledge transfer. Manag. Sci. 50, 1477--1490.

Digital Library

[82]

Lewis, J. D. and Weigert, A. 1985. Trust as a social reality. Social Forces 63, 4, 967--985.

[83]

Likert, R. 1932. A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archiv. Psychol. 140, 1, 1--55.

[84]

Liu, H., Lim, E.-P., Lauw, H. W., Le, M.-T., Sun, A., Srivastava, J., and Kim, Y. A. 2008. Predicting trusts among users of online communities: An epinions case study. In Proceedings of the 9^th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce (EC'08). ACM Press, New York, 310--319.

Digital Library

[85]

Maheswaran, M., Tang, H. C., and Ghunaim, A. 2007. Towards a gravity-based trust model for social networking systems. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems Workshops. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos, CA, 24.

Digital Library

[86]

Malik, Z., Akbar, I., and Bouguettaya, A. 2009. Web services reputation assessment using a hidden markov model. In Proceedings of the 7^th International Joint Conference on Service-Oriented Computing (ICSOC-ServiceWave'09). 576--591.

Digital Library

[87]

Malik, Z. and Bouguettaya, A. 2009. Reputation bootstrapping for trust establishment among web services. IEEE Internet Comput. 13, 40--47.

Digital Library

[88]

Manikrao, U. S. and Prabhakar, T. V. 2005. Dynamic selection of web services with recommendation system. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Next Generation Web Services Practices (NWESP'05). IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos, CA, 117--121.

Digital Library

[89]

Marmol, F. G. and Perez, G. M. 2011. Trust and reputation models comparison. Internet Res. 21, 138--153.

[90]

Marsh, S. P. 1994. Formalising trust as a computational concept. Ph.D. thesis, University of Stirling.

[91]

Massa, P. and Avesani, P. 2007. Trust-aware recommender systems. In Proceedings of the 1^st ACM Conference on Recommender Systems (RecSys'07). ACM Press, New York.

Digital Library

[92]

Mcleod, A. and Pippin, S. 2009. Security and privacy trust in e-government: Understanding system and relationship trust antecedents. In Proceedings of the 42^nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'09). 1--10.

Digital Library

[93]

Mcpherson, M., Lovin, L. S., and Cook, J. M. 2001. Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Ann. Rev. Sociol. 27, 1, 415--444.

[94]

Mika, P. 2007. Social Networks and the Semantic Web. Springer.

Digital Library

[95]

Miles, R. E. and Creed, W. E. D. 1995. Organizational forms and managerial philosophies: A descriptive and analytical review. Res. Organizat. Behav. 17, 333--372.

[96]

Milgram, S. 1967. The small world problem. Psychol. Today 1, 1, 60--67.

[97]

Moibus, M. and Quoc-Anh, D. 2004. Social capital in social networks. http://www.earthinstitute. columbia.edu/cgsd/documents/rosenblat.pdf.

[98]

Mollering, G. 2002. The nature of trust: From geog simmel to a theory of expectation, interpretation and suspension. Sociol. 35, 403--420.

[99]

Molm, L. D., Takahashi, N., and Peterson, G. 2000. Risk and trust in social exchange: An experimental test of a classical proposition. Amer. J. Sociol. 5, 105, 1396--1427.

[100]

Momani, M. and Challa, S. 2010. Survey of trust models in different network domains. Int. J. Ad Hoc Sensor Ubiq. Comput. 1, 3, 1--19.

[101]

Moreland, D., Nepal, S., Hwang, H., and Zic, J. 2010. A snapshot of trusted personal devices applicable to transaction processing. Personal Ubiq. Comput. 14, 4, 347--361.

Digital Library

[102]

Mui, L. 2003. Computational models of trust and reputation: Agents, evolutionary games, and social networks. Ph.D. thesis. http://groups.csail.mit.edu/medg/people/lmui/docs/phddissertation.pdf.

[103]

Mui, L., Mohtashemi, M., and Halberstadt, A. 2002. A computational model of trust and reputation. In Proceedings of the 35^th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'02). IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos, CA, 188--196.

Digital Library

[104]

Nahapiet, J. and Ghoshal, S. 1998. Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy Manag. Rev. 23, 2, 242--266.

[105]

Nepal, S., Sherchan, W., and Bouguettaya, A. 2010a. A behavior based trust model for service web. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Service-Oriented Computing and Applications (SOCA'10). IEEE Computer Society, 1--4.

[106]

Nepal, S., Sherchan, W., and Paris, C. 2011. STrust: A trust model for social networks. In Proceedings of the 10^th IEEE International Conference on Trust, Security and Privacy in Computing and Communications (TrustCom'11). 841--846.

Digital Library

[107]

Nepal, S., Zic, J., Liu, D., and Jang, J. 2010b. Trusted computing platform in your pocket. In Proceedings of the IEEE/IFIP International Conference on Embedded and Ubiquitous Computing (EUC'10). IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos, CA, 812--817.

Digital Library

[108]

O'Donovan, J., Smyth, B., Evrim, V., and Mcleod, D. 2007. Extracting and visualizing trust relationships from online auction feedback comments. In Proceedings of the 20^th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Francisco, 2826--2831.

Digital Library

[109]

Paldam, M. 2000. Social capital: One or many&quest; Definition and measurement. J. Econ. Surv. 5, 1, 629--653.

[110]

Paradesi, S., Doshi, P., and Swaika, S. 2009. Integrating behavioral trust in web service compositions. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Web Services (ICWS'09). 453--460.

Digital Library

[111]

Putnam, R. 2000. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. Simon and Schuster, New York.

Digital Library

[112]

Putnam, R. D. 1995. Bowling alone: America's declining social capital. J. Democracy 6, 1, 65--78.

[113]

Resnick, P., Zeckhauser, R., Friedman, E., and Kuwabara, K. 2000. Reputation systems. Comm. ACM 43, 12, 45--48.

Digital Library

[114]

Richardson, M., Agrawal, R., and Domingos, P. 2003. Trust management for the semantic web. In Proceedings of the 2^nd International Semantic Web Conference. 351--368.

[115]

Romer, P. M. 2000. Thinking and feeling. Amer. Econ. Rev. 90, 2, 439--443.

[116]

Rotter, J. B. 1967. A new scale for the measurement of interpersonal trust. J. Personality 35, 4, 651--665.

[117]

Rotter, J. B. 1971. Generalized expectancies for interpersonal trust. Amer. Psychol. 26, 1, 443--452.

[118]

Rousseau, D. M., Sitkin, S. B., Burt, R. S., and Camerer, C. 1998. Not so different after all: A cross-discipline view of trust. Academy Manag. Rev. 23, 3, 393--404.

[119]

Ruohomaa, S. and Kutvonen, L. 2005. Trust management survey. In Proceedings of the 3^rd International Conference on Trust Management (iTrust'05). Springer, 77--92.

Digital Library

[120]

Ruohomaa, S., Kutvonen, L., and Koutrouli, E. 2007. Reputation management survey. In Proceedings of the 2^nd International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security (ARES'07). IEEE Computer Society, 103--111.

Digital Library

[121]

Sabater, J. 2002. Trust and reputation for agent societies. Ph.D. thesis, Autonomous University Of Barcelona, Spain. http://www.tesisenxarxa.net/TESIS_UAB/AVAILABLE/TDX-0123104172828//jsm1de1.pdf.

[122]

Sabater, J. and Sierra, C. 2002. Reputation and social network analysis in multi-agent systems. In Proceedings of the 1^st International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS'02). ACM Press, New York, 475--482.

Digital Library

[123]

Sabater, J. and Sierra, C. 2005. Review on computational trust and reputation models. Artif. Intell. Rev. 24, 33--60.

Digital Library

[124]

Schillo, M., Funk, P., and Rovatsos, M. 2000. Using trust for detecting deceitful agents in artificial societies. Appl. Artif. Intell. 14, 8, 825--848.

[125]

Schneider, O. 2009. Trust-aware social networking: A distributed storage system based on social trust and geographic proximity. M.S. thesis. http://www.peerson.net/papers/oliver_da.pdf.

[126]

Scully, M. and Preuss, G. 1996. Two faces of trust: The roles of calculative and relational trust in work transformation. Tech. rep. working paper no. 3923--96, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

[127]

Seshadri, A., Perrig, A., van Doorn, L., and Khosla, P. K. 2004. SWATT: Software-based attestation for embedded devices. In Proceedings of the IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy. 272--282.

[128]

Singh, M. P., Yu, B., and Venkatraman, M. 2001. Community-based service location. Comm. ACM 44, 49--54.

Digital Library

[129]

Singh, S. and Bawa, S. 2007. Privacy, trust and policy based authorization framework for services in distributed environments. Int. J. Comput. Sci. 2, 2, 85--92.

[130]

Song, S., Hwang, K., Zhou, R., and Kwok, Y.-K. 2005. Trusted p2p transactions with fuzzy reputation aggregation. IEEE Internet Comput. 9, 6, 24--34.

Digital Library

[131]

Song, W., Phoha, V. V., and Xu, X. 2004. The hmm-based model for evaluating recommender's reputation. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on E-Commerce Technology for Dynamic E-Business. IEEE, 209--215.

Digital Library

[132]

Staab, S., Bhargava, B., Lilien, L., Rosenthal, A., Winslett, M., Sloman, M., Dillon, T. S., Chang, E., Hussain, F. K., Nejdl, W., Olmedilla, D., and Kashyap, V. 2004. The pudding of trust: Managing the dynamic nature of trust. IEEE Intell. Syst. 19, 5, 74--88.

Digital Library

[133]

Sturgis, P., Read, S., Hatemi, P., Zhu, G., Trull, T., Wright, M., and Martin, N. 2010. A genetic basis for social trust&quest; Polit. Behav. 32, 2, 205--230.

[134]

Suh, B. and Han, I. 2002. Effect of trust on customer acceptance of Internet banking. Electron. Commerce Res. Appl. 1, 3--4, 247--263.

[135]

Suryanarayana, G., T. R. 2004. A survey of trust management and resource discovery technologies in peer-to-peer applications. Tech. rep. UCI-ISR-04-6, Institute for Software Research, University of California, Irvine.

[136]

Sztompka, P. 1999. Trust: A Sociological Theory. Cambridge University Press.

[137]

Taylor, R. 2000. Marketing strategies: Gaining a competitive advantage through the use of emotion. Competitiv. Rev. 10, 146--152.

[138]

Toivonen, S., Lenzini, G., and Uusitalo, I. 2006. Context-aware trust evaluation functions for dynamic reconfigurable systems. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Models of Trust for the Web (MTW'06), held in Conjunction with the 15^th International World Wide Web Conference, T. Finin, L. Kagal, and D. Olmedilla, Eds., CEUR Workshop Proceedings Series, vol. 190.

[139]

Trifunovic, S., Legendre, F., and Anastasiades, C. 2010. Social trust in opportunistic networks. In Proceedings of the INFOCOM IEEE Conference on Computer Communications Workshops. IEEE, 1--6.

[140]

Tyler, T. R. 1990. Why People Obey the Law. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.

[141]

Tyler, T. R. and Degoey, P. 1996. Trust in organizational authorities: The influence of motive attributions on willingness to accept decisions. In Trust in Organizations: Frontiers of Theory and Research, R. M. Kramer and T. R. Tyler, Eds., Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.

[142]

Vigas, F. B. and Donath, J. 2004. Social network visualization: Can we go beyond the graph&quest; In Proceedings of the Workshop on Social Networks for Design and Analysis: Using Network Information in CSCW. 6--10.

[143]

von Laszewski, G., Alunkal, B., and Veljkovic, I. 2005. Towards reputable grids: Scalable computing. Pract. Exper. 6, 3, 95--106.

[144]

Waldman, M., Rubin, A. D., and Cranor, L. F. 2000. Publius: A robust, tamper-evident, censorship resistent web publishing system. In Proceedings of the 9^th USENIX Security Symposium.

Digital Library

[145]

Walter, F. E., Battiston, S., and Schweitzer, F. 2009. Personalised and dynamic trust in social networks. In Proceedings of the 3^rd ACM Conference on Recommender Systems (RecSys'09). ACM Press, New York, 197--204.

Digital Library

[146]

Wang, T. and Lu, Y. 2010. Determinants of trust in e-government. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Software Engineering (CiSE'10). 1--4.

[147]

Wang, Y., Hori, Y., and Sakurai, K. 2007. Economic-inspired truthful reputation feedback mechanism in p2p networks. In Proceedings of the 11^th IEEE International Workshop on Future Trends of Distributed Computing Systems. 80--88.

Digital Library

[148]

Wang, Y. and Vassileva, J. 2007. A review on trust and reputation for web service selection. In Proceedings of the 27^th International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems Workshops (ICDCSW'07). IEEE Computer Society, 25--32.

Digital Library

[149]

Watts, D. J. 2003. Six Degrees: The Science of a Connected Age. W.W. Norton and Company, New York.

[150]

Wei-Hang, C. and Singh, M. P. 2010. Trust-based recommendation based on graph similarity. In Proceedings of the 13^th AAMAS Workshop on Trust in Agent Societies. http://www.csc.ncsu.edu/faculty/mpsingh/papers/mas/aamas-trust-10-graph.pdf.

[151]

Wellman, B. 1996. For a social network analysis of computer networks: A sociological perspective on collaborative work and virtual community. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGCPR/SIGMIS Conference on Computer Personnel Research (SIGCPR'96). ACM Press, New York, 1--11.

Digital Library

[152]

Wellman, B. 2004. The global village: Internet and community. Arts Sci. Rev. 1, 1, 26--30.

[153]

Williamson, O. E. 1993. Calculativeness, trust and economic organization. J. Law Econ. 30, 1, 131--145.

[154]

Wishart, R., Robinson, R., Indulska, J., and Josang, A. 2005. Superstringrep: Reputation-enhanced service discovery. In Proceedings of the 28^th Australasian Conference on Computer Science (ACSC'05). Australian Computer Society, Darlinghurst, Australia, 49--57.

Digital Library

[155]

Xiang, R., Neville, J., and Rogati, M. 2010. Modeling relationship strength in online social networks. In Proceedings of the 19^th International Conference on World Wide Web (WWW'10). ACM Press, New York, 981--990.

Digital Library

[156]

Xiong, L. and Liu, L. 2003. A reputation-based trust model for peer-to-peer ecommerce communities. In Proceedings of the 4^th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce (EC'03). ACM Press, New York, 228--229.

Digital Library

[157]

Xiong, L. and Liu, L. 2004. PeerTrust: Supporting reputation-based trust for peer-to-peer electronic communities. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Engin. 16, 7, 843--857.

Digital Library

[158]

Yan, Z., Niemi, V., Dong, Y., and Yu, G. 2008. A user behavior based trust model for mobile applications. In Proceedings of the 5^th International Conference on Autonomic and Trusted Computing. 455--469.

Digital Library

[159]

Yan, Z. and Yan, R. 2009. Formalizing trust based on usage behaviours for mobile applications. In Proceedings of the 6^th International Conference on Autonomic and Trusted Computing. 194--208.

Digital Library

[160]

Yang, J., Hu, X., and Zhang, H. 2007. Effects of a reputation feedback system on an online consumer-to-consumer auction market. Decis. Support Syst. 44, 1, 93--105.

Digital Library

[161]

Yaniv, I. and Kleinberger, E. 2000. Advice taking in decision making: Egocentric discounting and reputation formation. Organiz. Behav. Hum. Decision Process. 83, 2, 260--281.

[162]

Yao, J., Chen, S., Nepal, S., Levy, D., and Zic, J. 2010. Truststore: Making amazon s3 trustworthy with services composition. In Proceedings of the 10^th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Cluster, Cloud and Grid Computing (CCGRID'10). IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos, CA, 600--605.

Digital Library

[163]

Young, A. L. and Quan-Haase, A. 2009. Information revelation and internet privacy concerns on social network sites: A case study of facebook. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Communities and Technologies. 265--274.

Digital Library

[164]

Yu, B. and Singh, M. P. 2000. A social mechanism for reputation management in electronic communities. In Proceedings of the 4^th International Workshop on Cooperative Information Agents (CIA'00). Springer, 154--165.

Digital Library

[165]

Yu, B. and Singh, M. P. 2002. An evidential model of distributed reputation management. In Proceedings of the 1^st International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems (AAMAS'02). ACM Press, New York, 294--301.

Digital Library

[166]

Yu, B., Singh, M. P., and Sycara, K. 2004. Developing trust in large-scale peer-to-peer systems. In Proceedings of the 1^st IEEE Symposium on Multi-Agent Security and Survivability. IEEE Computer Society, 1--10.

[167]

Zacharia, G. and Maes, P. 2000. Trust management through reputation mechanisms. Appl. Artif. Intell. 14, 9, 881--907.

[168]

Zajonc, R. 1980. Feeling and thinking: Preferences need no inferences. Amer. Psychol. 35, 2, 151--175.

[169]

Zappen, J. P., Harrison, T. M., and Watson, D. 2008. A new paradigm for designing e-government: Web 2.0 and experience design. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Digital Government Research. Digital Government Society of North America, 17--26.

Digital Library

[170]

Zarghami, A., Fazeli, S., Dokoohaki, N., and Matskin, M. 2009. Social trust-aware recommendation system: A t-index approach. In Proceedings of the IEEE/WIC/ACM International Joint Conference on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology (WI-IAT'09). IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos, CA, 85--90.

Digital Library

[171]

Zhang, Y., Chen, H., and Wu, Z. 2006. A social network-based trust model for the semantic web. In Proceedings of the 6^th International Conference on Autonomic and Trusted Computing. 183--192.

Digital Library

[172]

Zhang, Y. and Fang, Y. 2007. A fine-grained reputation system for reliable service selection in peer-to-peer networks. IEEE Trans. Parallel Distrib. Syst. 18, 8, 1134--1145.

Digital Library

[173]

Zhou, R. and Hwang, K. 2007. PowerTrust: A robust and scalable reputation system for trusted peer-to-peer computing. IEEE Trans. Parallel Distrib. Syst. 18, 4, 460--473.

Digital Library

[174]

Ziegler, C.-N. and Lausen, G. 2004. Spreading activation models for trust propagation. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on e-Technology, e-Commerce and e-Service (EEE'04). IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos, CA, 83--97.

Digital Library

[175]

Zuo, Y., Hu, W.-C., and O'Keefe, T. 2009. Trust computing for social networking. In Proceedings of the 6^th International Conference on Information Technology: New Generations. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos, CA, 1534--1539.

Digital Library

Cited By

Balcı ŞSarıtaş Hİldız SMohammed R(2024)Sosyal Medyaya Güven Düzeyinin Dijital Ortamlarda Sağlık Bilgisi Edinme ve Teyit Davranışı Üzerindeki Etkisinde Kullanım Süresinin Aracılık RolüYeni Medya Dergisi10.55609/yenimedya.1456726Online publication date: 30-May-2024
https://doi.org/10.55609/yenimedya.1456726
Zhao JJiang NPei KWen JZhan HTu Z(2024)TPoison: Data-Poisoning Attack against GNN-Based Social Trust ModelMathematics10.3390/math1212181312:12(1813)Online publication date: 11-Jun-2024
https://doi.org/10.3390/math12121813
Mahajan YCho JChen I(2024)Privacy-Preserving and Diversity-Aware Trust-based Team Formation in Online Social NetworksACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology10.1145/3670411Online publication date: 5-Jun-2024
https://doi.org/10.1145/3670411
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

A survey of trust in social networks
1. General and reference
  1. Document types
    1. Surveys and overviews
2. Software and its engineering
  1. Software organization and properties
    1. Software system structures
      1. Distributed systems organizing principles
        Organizing principles for web applications

Recommendations

Building trust communities using social trust
UMAP'11: Proceedings of the 19th international conference on Advances in User Modeling

The growing popularity of Web based social networks has given rise to the need to build trust communities that inspire members to share their experiences, feelings and opinions in an open and honest way. In this paper, we propose a framework for building ...
Social Ties and Generalized Trust, Online and in Person: Contact or Conflict-The Mediating Role of Bonding Social Capital in America

Results of the present survey (n = 888) suggest that having strong social ties (or bonding social capital) fosters generalized trust, in support of conflict theory. There was no link between bridging social capital, or one's more diverse ties, and ...
Social trust and algorithmic equity: The societal perspectives of users' intention to interact with algorithm recommendation systems
Abstract
The use of algorithm recommendation systems (ARS), which collect and analyze users' personal data to generate personalized and tailored recommended items, has become widespread in the era of mobile internet. While related literature has focused ...
Highlights
- We examine the trust-driven psychological mechanism leading to intention to interact with algorithm recommendation systems.
- We focus on societal aspects of algorithm recommendation systems such as social trust and algorithmic equity.

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Computing Surveys

ACM Computing Surveys Volume 45, Issue 4

August 2013

490 pages

ISSN:0360-0300

EISSN:1557-7341

DOI:10.1145/2501654

Issue’s Table of Contents

Copyright © 2013 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 30 August 2013

Accepted: 01 August 2012

Revised: 01 March 2012

Received: 01 September 2011

Published in CSUR Volume 45, Issue 4

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article
Research
Refereed

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

482
Total Citations
View Citations
8,145
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)486
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)27

Reflects downloads up to 26 Sep 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Balcı ŞSarıtaş Hİldız SMohammed R(2024)Sosyal Medyaya Güven Düzeyinin Dijital Ortamlarda Sağlık Bilgisi Edinme ve Teyit Davranışı Üzerindeki Etkisinde Kullanım Süresinin Aracılık RolüYeni Medya Dergisi10.55609/yenimedya.1456726Online publication date: 30-May-2024
https://doi.org/10.55609/yenimedya.1456726
Zhao JJiang NPei KWen JZhan HTu Z(2024)TPoison: Data-Poisoning Attack against GNN-Based Social Trust ModelMathematics10.3390/math1212181312:12(1813)Online publication date: 11-Jun-2024
https://doi.org/10.3390/math12121813
Mahajan YCho JChen I(2024)Privacy-Preserving and Diversity-Aware Trust-based Team Formation in Online Social NetworksACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology10.1145/3670411Online publication date: 5-Jun-2024
https://doi.org/10.1145/3670411
Lim JThing V(2024)Building Confidence in a World of Eroding TrustDigital Government: Research and Practice10.1145/36530755:2(1-17)Online publication date: 19-Mar-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3653075
Becherer MHussain OZhang Yden Hartog FChang E(2024)On Trust Recommendations in the Social Internet of Things – A SurveyACM Computing Surveys10.1145/364510056:6(1-35)Online publication date: 8-Feb-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3645100
Ryan‐Mosley T(2024)Digital peacebuilding in post‐conflict Colombia – A conceptual frameworkGlobal Policy10.1111/1758-5899.1333015:S3(47-57)Online publication date: 18-Jun-2024
https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.13330
Zhan ZWang YDuan PSai ALiu ZXiang CTong XWang WCai Z(2024)Enhancing Worker Recruitment in Collaborative Mobile Crowdsourcing: A Graph Neural Network Trust Evaluation ApproachIEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing10.1109/TMC.2024.337346923:10(10093-10110)Online publication date: 1-Oct-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1109/TMC.2024.3373469
Choi SXie ZTan TLiu YWu YWang X(2024)Towards a Trusted and Cryptocurrency-Enabled Decentralized Wireless Community Network2024 IEEE International Conference on Blockchain and Cryptocurrency (ICBC)10.1109/ICBC59979.2024.10634396(1-7)Online publication date: 27-May-2024
https://doi.org/10.1109/ICBC59979.2024.10634396
Bu YZhu YGeng LZhou K(2024)Uncovering Strong Ties: A Study of Indirect Sybil Attack on Signed Social NetworkICASSP 2024 - 2024 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP)10.1109/ICASSP48485.2024.10447587(4535-4539)Online publication date: 14-Apr-2024
https://doi.org/10.1109/ICASSP48485.2024.10447587
Commey DMai BHounsinou SCrosby G(2024)Securing Blockchain-Based IoT Systems: A ReviewIEEE Access10.1109/ACCESS.2024.342849012(98856-98881)Online publication date: 2024
https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3428490
Show More Cited By

View Options

Get Access

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Article

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Issue’s Table of Contents