poster

Navigating constraints: the design work of professional software developers

Authors:

Josh TenenbergAuthors Info & Claims

CHI EA '13: CHI '13 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems

Pages 103 - 108

https://doi.org/10.1145/2468356.2468376

Published: 27 April 2013 Publication History

Abstract

This paper reports on initial results from a study of software developers doing their authentic work in their place of work. We apply the ethnographic and interaction-analytic methods that the CHI community has used to study people carrying out their work in non-software domains. Our preliminary results show professional software developers spending the majority of their time navigating a myriad of largely invisible constraints arising from multiple, concrete, real-world sources. They use frequent hypothesis-probe-interpret to cycles navigate the contextual, complex systems that they inhabit and construct. These constraints are qualitatively different from those reported in the literature based on early conceptual design.

References

[1]

Baker, A., Van der Hoek, A., Ossher, H., and Petre, M. Guest Editors' Introduction: Studying Professional Software Design. IEEE Software 29, 1 (2012), 28--33.

Digital Library

[2]

Baker, A. and Van der Hoek, A. Ideas, subjects, and cycles as lenses for understanding the software design process. Design Studies 31, 6 (2010), 590--613.

[3]

Ball, L.J., Onarheim, B., and Christensen, B.T. Design requirements, epistemic uncertainty and solution development strategies in software design. Design Studies 31, 6 (2010), 567--589.

[4]

Bell, G., Blythe, M., and Sengers, P. Making by making strange: Defamiliarization and the design of domestic technologies. ACM Transactions on ComputerHuman Interaction 12, 2 (2005), 149--173.

Digital Library

[5]

Cherubini, M., Venolia, G., DeLine, R., and Ko, A.J. Let's Go to the Whiteboard: How and Why Software Developers Use Drawings. Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems CHI '07, ACM Press (2007), 557--566.

Digital Library

[6]

Dekel, U. and Herbsleb, J. Notation and Representation in Collaborative Object-Oriented Design: An Observational Study. OOPSLA '07: Proceedings of the 22nd annual ACM SIGPLAN conference on Object-oriented programming systems and applications, (2007), 261--280.

Digital Library

[7]

Ericsson, K.A. and Simon, H.A. Protocol Analysis: Verbal Reports as Data. MIT Press, 1993.

[8]

Jordan, B., ed. Advancing Ethnography in Corporate Environments: Challenges and Emerging Opportunities. 2013.

[9]

Jordan, B.B. and Henderson, A. Interacton Analysis: Foundations and Practice. The Journal of the Learning Sciences 4, 1 (1995), 39--103.

[10]

Lausberg, H. Coding gestural behavior with the NEUROGES-ELAN system. Behavior Research Methods 41, 3 (2009), 841 -- 849.

[11]

Miller, G. The cognitive revolution: a historical perspective. TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences 7, 3 (2003), 141--144.

[12]

Petre, M., Van der Hoek, A., and Baker, A. Editorial. Design Studies 31, 6 (2010), 533--544.

[13]

Salomon, G., ed. Distributed Cognitions: Psychological and Educational Considerations. Cambridge University Press, 1993.

[14]

Suchman, L. and Trigg, R. Understanding practice: video as a medium for reflection and design. In J. Greenbaum and M. Kyng, eds., Design at Work: Cooperative Design of Computer Systems. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1991, 65--89.

Digital Library

[15]

Szymanski, M. and Whalen, J., eds. Making Work Visible: Ethnographically Grounded Case Studies of Work Practice. Cambridge University Press, 2011.

[16]

Tang, A. What makes software design effective? Design Studies 31, 6 (2010), 614 -- 640.

Cited By

Socha DSutanto KBegel APrikladnicki RDittrich Yde Souza CSarma AAthavale S(2015)The "pair" as a problematic unit of analysis for pair programmingProceedings of the Eighth International Workshop on Cooperative and Human Aspects of Software Engineering10.5555/2819321.2819332(64-70)Online publication date: 16-May-2015
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/2819321.2819332
Socha DSutanto K(2015)The "Pair" as a Problematic Unit of Analysis for Pair ProgrammingProceedings of the 2015 IEEE/ACM 8th International Workshop on Cooperative and Human Aspects of Software Engineering10.1109/CHASE.2015.16(64-70)Online publication date: 18-May-2015
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1109/CHASE.2015.16
Tenenberg J(2014)Asking Research QuestionsACM Transactions on Computing Education10.1145/264492414:3(1-8)Online publication date: 11-Sep-2014
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/2644924

Index Terms

Navigating constraints: the design work of professional software developers
1. Human-centered computing
  1. Human computer interaction (HCI)

Recommendations

Understanding infusion administration in the ICU through Distributed Cognition

Graphical abstractDisplay Omitted Highlights Infusion administration can be interpreted in terms of Distributed Cognition. DiCoT can be used to study infusion pump use in an ICU from a DC perspective. DiCoT can help to improve the user interface of an ...
Wild in the Laboratory: A Discussion of Plans and Situated Actions
Special Issue of “The Turn to The Wild”

Suchman’s book Plans and Situated Actions has been influential in HCI (Human Computer Interaction). The book is often discussed with reference to ethnographic fieldwork, sometimes being cited as if it were a field study. However, the book uses examples ...
The limits of ethnography: combining social sciences for CSCW
CSCW '94: Proceedings of the 1994 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work

This paper addresses some of the divergences between social sciences, and proposes the development of hybrid forms of participation in CSCW. It offers a critique of the theoretical isolationism of some ethnomethodological ethnography. It reviews the ...

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences

CHI EA '13: CHI '13 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems

April 2013

3360 pages

ISBN:9781450319522

DOI:10.1145/2468356

General Chair:
Wendy E. Mackay
INRIA
,
Program Chairs:
Stephen Brewster
Glasgow University
,
Susanne Bødker
University of Aarhus

Copyright © 2013 Copyright is held by the owner/author(s).

Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

Sponsors

SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 27 April 2013

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Poster

Conference

CHI '13

Sponsor:

SIGCHI

CHI '13: CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

April 27 - May 2, 2013

Paris, France

Acceptance Rates

CHI EA '13 Paper Acceptance Rate 630 of 1,963 submissions, 32%;

Overall Acceptance Rate 6,164 of 23,696 submissions, 26%

Upcoming Conference

CHI 2025

Sponsor:
sigchi

ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

April 26 - May 1, 2025

Yokohama , Japan

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

3
Total Citations
View Citations
171
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)0
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

Reflects downloads up to 16 Feb 2025

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Socha DSutanto KBegel APrikladnicki RDittrich Yde Souza CSarma AAthavale S(2015)The "pair" as a problematic unit of analysis for pair programmingProceedings of the Eighth International Workshop on Cooperative and Human Aspects of Software Engineering10.5555/2819321.2819332(64-70)Online publication date: 16-May-2015
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/2819321.2819332
Socha DSutanto K(2015)The "Pair" as a Problematic Unit of Analysis for Pair ProgrammingProceedings of the 2015 IEEE/ACM 8th International Workshop on Cooperative and Human Aspects of Software Engineering10.1109/CHASE.2015.16(64-70)Online publication date: 18-May-2015
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1109/CHASE.2015.16
Tenenberg J(2014)Asking Research QuestionsACM Transactions on Computing Education10.1145/264492414:3(1-8)Online publication date: 11-Sep-2014
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/2644924

View Options

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Figures

Tables

Media

View Table of Conten