Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/1969773.1969787acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesautomotiveuiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

HapTouch and the 2+1 state model: potentials of haptic feedback on touch based in-vehicle information systems

Published: 11 November 2010 Publication History

Abstract

Haptic feedback on touch-sensitive displays provides significant benefits in terms of reducing error rates, increasing interaction speed and minimizing visual distraction. This particularly holds true for multitasking situations such as the interaction with mobile devices or touch-based in-vehicle systems. In this paper, we explore how the interaction with tactile touchscreens can be modeled and enriched using a 2+1 state transition model. The model expands an approach presented by Buxton. We present HapTouch -- a force-sensitive touchscreen device with haptic feedback that allows the user to explore and manipulate interactive elements using the sense of touch. We describe the results of a preliminary quantitative study to investigate the effects of tactile feedback on the driver's visual attention, driving performance and operating error rate. In particular, we focus on how active tactile feedback allows the accurate interaction with small on-screen elements during driving. Our results show significantly reduced error rates and input time when haptic feedback is given.

References

[1]
R. Leung, K. MacLean, M. Bertelsen, and M. Saubhasik, "Evaluation of haptically augmented touchscreen GUI elements under cognitive load," Proceedings of the 9th international conference on Multimodal interfaces, ACM, 2007, p. 374--381.
[2]
W. Buxton, "A three-state model of graphical input," Human-computer interaction-INTERACT, 1990, p. 449--456.
[3]
J. Mackinlay, S. Card, and G. Robertson, "A semantic analysis of the design space of input devices," Human-Computer Interaction, vol. 5, 1990, p. 145--190.
[4]
D. Harel, "Statecharts: A visual formalism for complex systems," Science of computer programming, 1987.
[5]
A. Meroth and B. Tolg, Infotainmentsysteme im Kraftfahrzeug, Wiesbaden: Vieweg, 2008.
[6]
R. Ecker, V. Broy, and N. Joshi, "Toggle strategies for the POI selection via the iDrive controller," Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications - AutomotiveUI '09, 2009, p. 71.
[7]
A. Rydström, P. Bengtsson, C. Grane, and R. Broström, "Multifunctional systems in vehicles: a usability evaluation," Proceedings of CybErg 2005, 2005.
[8]
G. Burnett, "Ubiquitous computing within cars: designing controls for non-visual use," International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, vol. 55, 2001, pp. 521--531.
[9]
B. Shneiderman, "Touchscreens now offer compelling uses," Sparks of innovation in human-computer interaction, vol. 8, 1993, p. 187.
[10]
O. Tsimhoni and P. Green, "Visual demand of driving and the execution of display-intensive in-vehicle tasks," PROCEEDINGS OF THE HUMAN FACTORS, 2001, pp. 1586--1590.
[11]
A. Rydström, C. Grane, and P. Bengtsson, "Driver behaviour during haptic and visual secondary tasks," Proceedings of AutomotiveUI '09, 2009, p. 121.
[12]
A. L. Kun, T. Paek, Ž. Medenica, N. Memarović, and O. Palinko, "Glancing at personal navigation devices can affect driving," Proceedings of AutomotiveUI '09, 2009, p. 129.
[13]
Mattes, S. The lane change task as a tool for driver distraction evaluation. In H. Strasser, H. Rausch, & H. Bubb (Eds.), Quality of work and products in enterprises of the future. Stuttgart: Ergonomia Verlag. 2003
[14]
M. Hall, E. Hoggan, and S. Brewster, "T-Bars: towards tactile user interfaces for mobile touchscreens," Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Human computer interaction with mobile devices and services, ACM, 2008, p. 411--414.
[15]
S. Brewster, F. Chohan, and L. Brown, "Tactile feedback for mobile interactions," Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, 2007, p. 162.
[16]
E. Hoggan, S. Brewster, and J. Johnston, "Investigating the effectiveness of tactile feedback for mobile touchscreens," Methodology, 2008.
[17]
A. Oulasvirta, S. Tamminen, V. Roto, and J. Kuorelahti, "Interaction in 4-second bursts: the fragmented nature of attentional resources in mobile HCI," Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, New York, New York, USA: ACM, 2005, p. 928.
[18]
E. Hutchins, J. Hollan, and D. Norman, "Direct Manipulation Interfaces," Human-Computer Interaction, vol. 1, 1985, pp. 311--338.
[19]
ISO. Draft ISO/DIS 26022 - Road Vehicles - Ergonomic Aspects of Transport Information and Control Systems - Simulated Lane Change Test to Asses In-Vehicle Secondary Task Demand. International Standard for Organization, 2007.
[20]
John Brooke. SUS: a quick and dirty usability scale. P. W. Jordan, B. Thomas, B. A. Weerdmeester, A. L. McClelland (eds.). Usability Evaluation in Industry, page 189194, 1996.
[21]
R. Potter, L. Weldon, and B. Shneiderman, "Improving the accuracy of touch screens: an experimental evaluation of three strategies, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, ACM, 1988, p. 27--32.
[22]
J. Lee and C. Spence, "Assessing the benefits of multimodal feedback on dual-task performance under demanding conditions", Proceedings of the 22nd British HCI Group Annual Conference on HCI 2008: People and Computers XXII: Culture, Creativity, Interaction-Volume 1, British Computer Society, 2008, p. 185--192.
[23]
M. J. Pitts, M. a. Williams, T. Wellings, and A. Attridge, "Assessing subjective response to haptic feedback in automotive touchscreens," Proceedings of AutomotiveUI '09, 2009, p. 11.
[24]
K. Bach, M. Jæger, M. Skov, and N. Thomassen, "You can touch, but you can't look: interacting with in-vehicle systems," Proceedings of CHI, 2008, p. 1139.
[25]
R. Ecker, R., V. Broy, A. Butz, and A. De Luca, "pieTouch: a direct touch gesture interface for interacting with in-vehicle information systems". Proceedings of the 11th international Conference on Human-Computer interaction with Mobile Devices and Services, 2009.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Practical approaches to group-level multi-objective Bayesian optimization in interaction technique designCollective Intelligence10.1177/263391372412413133:1Online publication date: 1-Jan-2024
  • (2024)How Do Different Feedback Modalities Affect Drivers' Attention and Task Performance When Interacting with In-Vehicle Infotainment SystemsProceedings of the 16th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications10.1145/3640792.3675731(125-135)Online publication date: 22-Sep-2024
  • (2024)Haptic Technology Adoption and Future TrendsAdvances, Applications and the Future of Haptic Technology10.1007/978-3-031-70588-5_5(55-74)Online publication date: 17-Oct-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. HapTouch and the 2+1 state model: potentials of haptic feedback on touch based in-vehicle information systems

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

        Information & Contributors

        Information

        Published In

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        AutomotiveUI '10: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications
        November 2010
        160 pages
        ISBN:9781450304375
        DOI:10.1145/1969773
        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Sponsors

        • Carnegie Mellon University: Carnegie Mellon University

        In-Cooperation

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        Published: 11 November 2010

        Permissions

        Request permissions for this article.

        Check for updates

        Author Tags

        1. exploration
        2. haptics
        3. in-vehicle information systems
        4. multitasking
        5. tactile feedback
        6. touchscreen

        Qualifiers

        • Research-article

        Conference

        AutomotiveUI '10
        Sponsor:
        • Carnegie Mellon University

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate 248 of 566 submissions, 44%

        Contributors

        Other Metrics

        Bibliometrics & Citations

        Bibliometrics

        Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)24
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2
        Reflects downloads up to 16 Nov 2024

        Other Metrics

        Citations

        Cited By

        View all
        • (2024)Practical approaches to group-level multi-objective Bayesian optimization in interaction technique designCollective Intelligence10.1177/263391372412413133:1Online publication date: 1-Jan-2024
        • (2024)How Do Different Feedback Modalities Affect Drivers' Attention and Task Performance When Interacting with In-Vehicle Infotainment SystemsProceedings of the 16th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications10.1145/3640792.3675731(125-135)Online publication date: 22-Sep-2024
        • (2024)Haptic Technology Adoption and Future TrendsAdvances, Applications and the Future of Haptic Technology10.1007/978-3-031-70588-5_5(55-74)Online publication date: 17-Oct-2024
        • (2022)Usability Tests for Texture Comparison in an Electroadhesion-Based Haptic DeviceMultimodal Technologies and Interaction10.3390/mti61201086:12(108)Online publication date: 8-Dec-2022
        • (2022)Where's My Button? Evaluating the User Experience of Surface Haptics in Featureless Automotive User InterfacesIEEE Transactions on Haptics10.1109/TOH.2021.313105815:2(292-303)Online publication date: 1-Apr-2022
        • (2022)HapWheel: In-Car Infotainment System Feedback Using Haptic and Hovering TechniquesIEEE Transactions on Haptics10.1109/TOH.2021.309576315:1(121-130)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2022
        • (2022)Research on the Trend of Automotive User ExperienceCross-Cultural Design. Product and Service Design, Mobility and Automotive Design, Cities, Urban Areas, and Intelligent Environments Design10.1007/978-3-031-06053-3_13(180-201)Online publication date: 16-Jun-2022
        • (2020)Voice+Tactile: Augmenting In-vehicle Voice User Interface with Tactile Touchpad InteractionProceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3313831.3376863(1-12)Online publication date: 21-Apr-2020
        • (2019)A Theoretical Framework of Haptic Processing in Automotive User Interfaces and Its Implications on Design and EngineeringFrontiers in Psychology10.3389/fpsyg.2019.0147010Online publication date: 26-Jul-2019
        • (2019)HapSenseProceedings of the 32nd Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology - UIST '1910.1145/3332165.3347888(949-961)Online publication date: 2019
        • Show More Cited By

        View Options

        Login options

        View options

        PDF

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader

        Media

        Figures

        Other

        Tables

        Share

        Share

        Share this Publication link

        Share on social media