Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/1952222.1952269acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesozchiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Reflecting on reflection: framing a design landscape

Published: 22 November 2010 Publication History

Abstract

Designing for reflection is becoming of increasing interest to HCI researchers, especially as digital technologies move to supporting broader professional and quality of life issues. However, the term 'reflection' is being used and designed for in diverse ways and often with little reference to vast amount of literature on the topic outside of HCI. Here we synthesize this literature into a framework, consisting of aspects such as purposes of reflection, conditions for reflection and levels of reflection (where the levels capture the behaviours and activities associated with reflection). We then show how technologies can support these different aspects and conclude with open questions that can guide a more systematic approach to how we understand and design for support of reflection.

References

[1]
Ackerman E. Perspective-Taking and Object Construction, in Constructionism in practice. Edited by Y Kafai, M Resnick. Mahwah, NJ, Laurence Erlbaum Associates (1996) 25--36.
[2]
Allen AL: Dredging up the past: Lifelogging, Memory, and Surveillance. The University of Chicago Law Review 75 (2008) 47--74.
[3]
Anderson I, Maitland J, Sherwood S, Barkhuus L, Chalmers M, Hall M, Brown B, Muller H. Shakra: Tracking and Sharing Daily Activity Levels with Unaugmented Mobile Phones. Mobile Networks and Applications 12 (2007) 185--199.
[4]
Boud D, Keogh R, Walker D. Promoting reflection in learning, in Reflection: Turning experience into learning. Edited by D Boud, R Keogh, D Walker. London, Kogan Page (1985) 18--40.
[5]
Brereton M, McGarry B: An observational study of how objects support engineering design thinking and communication: implications for the design of tangible media. In Proc. CHI 2000, ACM Press (2000), 217--224.
[6]
Concise Oxford English Dictionary Last accessed June 29 2010 from http://www.askoxford.com/(2010).
[7]
Davis EA. Characterizing productive reflection among preservice elementary teachers: Seeing what matters. Teaching and Teacher Education 22 (2006) 281.
[8]
Draper SW. Notes on reflection. Last accessed June 28 2010, from http://www.psy.gla.ac.uk/~steve/reflection.html (1999)
[9]
Fleck R: Exploring the potential of passive image capture to support reflection on experience. Unpublished DPhil thesis, University of Sussex (2008).
[10]
Fleck R, Fitzpatrick G. Teachers' and tutors' social reflection around SenseCam images. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 67 (2009) 1024--1036.
[11]
Gama C. Helping students to help themselves: A pilot experiment on the ways of increasing metacognitive awareness in problem solving, In Proc. CINTEC'01, (2001) 175--182.
[12]
Gaver WW, Beaver J, Benford S. Ambiguity as a resource for design. In Proc CHI2003, ACM Press (2003) 233--240.
[13]
Gustafson KL, Bennett WJ. Issues and difficulties in promoting learner reflection: Results from a three-year study. Last accessed, June 29th 2010 from http://www.dtic.mil/cgi-bin/GetTRDoc?AD=ADA472616&Location=U2&doc=GetTRDoc.pdf (2002)
[14]
Harper R, Randell D, Smythe N, Evans C, Heledd L, Moore R: Thanks for the memory. In Proc. BHCI 2007, British Computer Society (2007) 39--42.
[15]
Hatton N, Smith D: Reflection in teacher education: Towards definition and implementation. Teaching and Teacher Education 11 (1995) 33--49.
[16]
Hindmarsh J, Heath C, Lehn Dv, Cleverly J: Creating assemblies: Aboard the Ghost Ship, in Proc CSCW 2002, ACM Press (2002) 56--165.
[17]
Hodges S, Williams L, Berry E, Izadi S, Srinivassan J, Butler A, Smyth G, Kapur N, Wood K: SenseCam: A retrospective memory aid, In Proc Ubicomp2006, Springer-Verlag (2006) 177--193.
[18]
Hutchinson B, Bryson P. Video, reflection and transformation: Action research in vocational education and training. Educational action research 5 (1997) 283--303.
[19]
Intille, S. S., Rondoni, J., Kukla, C., Ancona, I., and Bao, L. A context-aware experience sampling tool. Ext. Abstracts CHI 2003 ACM Press (2003) 972--973.
[20]
Jay JK, Johnson KL: Capturing complexity: a typology of reflective practice for teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education 18 (2002) 73--85.
[21]
Kember D, Jones A, Loke A, McKay J, Sinclair K, Tse H, Webb C, Wong F, Wong M, Yeung E: Determining the level of reflective thinking from students' written journals using a coding scheme based on the work of Mezirow. Int J of Lifelong Education 18 (1999) 18--30.
[22]
Lee H-J: Understanding and assessing preservice teachers' reflective thinking. Teaching and Teacher Education 21 (2005) 699--715.
[23]
Lindström M, Stahl A, Höök K, Sundström P, Laaksolathi J, Combetto M, Taylor A, Bresin R: Affective diary: designing for bodily expressiveness and self-reflection, in Ext. Abstracts CHI 2006, ACM Press, (2006).
[24]
Loh B, Radinsky J, Reiser BJ, Gomez LM, Edelson DC, Russell E: The progress portfollio: Promoting reflective inquiry in complex investigation environments, In Proc CSCL 97 (1997) 169--178.
[25]
Mamykina L, Mynatt E, Davidson P, Greenblatt D: MAHI: investigation of social scaffolding for reflective thinking in diabetes management, In Proc. CHI 2008, ACM Press (2008).
[26]
Manouchehri A: Developing teaching knowledge through peer discourse. Teaching and Teacher Education 18 (2002) 715--737.
[27]
Moon JA: Reflection in learning and professional development. London: Kogan Page Limited (1999).
[28]
Paolucci M, Suthers D, Weiner A: Belvedere: stimulating students' critical discussion, In Proc CHI 1995, ACM Press (1995).
[29]
Price S, Rogers Y, Stanton D, Smith H: A New Conceptual Framework for CSCL: Supporting Diverse Forms of Reflection through Multiple Interactions, in Designing for Change in Networked Learning Environments. Proc. CSCL 2003, Kluwer (2003) 513--522.
[30]
Rogers Y, Price S, Fitzpatrick G, Fleck R, Harris E, Smith H, Randell C, Muller H, O'Malley C, Stanton D, Thompson M, Weal M: Ambient Wood: Designing new forms of digital aumentation for learning outdoors, In Proc IDC 2004, ACM Press (2004) 3--10.
[31]
Rogers Y, Muller H: A framework for designing sensor-based interactions to promote exploration and refelction in play. Int J Human-Computer Studies 64 (2006) 1--14.
[32]
Sas C, Dix A: Designing for reflection on experience, in Proc. CHI 2009 Ext Abstracts ACM Press, (2009) 4741--4744. See workshop papers at http://www.comp.lancs.ac.uk/~corina/CHI09Workshop/Papers/.
[33]
Schank P, Ranney M: Improved reasoning with Convince Me, In CHI 2005, ACM Press (2005) 276--277.
[34]
Schön DA: The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. London: Temple Smith (1983).
[35]
Seale JK, Cann AJ: Reflection on-line or off-line: The role of learning technologies in encouraging students to reflect. Computers and Education 34 (2000) 309--320.
[36]
Sengers P, Liesendahl R, Magar W, Seibert C, Muller B, Joachims T, Geng W: The Enigmatics of Affect, In Proc. DIS 2002, ACM Press, (2002) 86--98.
[37]
Sengers P, Boehner K, David S, Kaye JJ: Reflective design, In Proc. Critical Computing 2005, ACM Press (2005) 49--58.
[38]
Sherin MG, van Es EA: Using video to support teachers' ability to interpret classroom interactions, In Proc. Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education AACE (2002) 2532--2536.
[39]
Smith H, Fitzpatrick G, Rogers Y: Eliciting reactive and reflective feedback for a social communication tool: a multi-session approach, In Proc. DIS 2004, ACM Press (2004) 39--48.
[40]
Smith H, Luckin R, Fizpatrick G, Avramides K, Underwood J: Technology at work to mediate collaborative scientific enquiry in the field, In Proc. AIED (2005) 603--610.
[41]
Sumison J, Fleet A: Reflection: Can we assess it? Should we assess it? Assessment and evaluation in higher education 21 (1996) 121--130.
[42]
Ward JR, McCotter SS: Reflection as a visible outcome for preservice teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education 20 (2004) 243--257.
[43]
Weiser M, Seely Brown J: The coming of age of calm technology, in Beyond Calculation: The Next Fifty Years of Computing. Edited by PJ Denning, RM Metcalfe. New York, Springer-Verlag (1997) 75--85.
[44]
Yukawa J: Co-reflection in online learning envrionments. SIGGROUP Bull 24 (2003) 49--58.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Promoting Self-Efficacy of Individuals With Autism in Practicing Social Skills in the Workplace Using Virtual Reality and Physiological Sensors: Mixed Methods StudyJMIR Formative Research10.2196/521578(e52157)Online publication date: 11-Jan-2024
  • (2024)Reflective Engagement With a Digital Physical Activity Intervention Among People Living With and Beyond Breast Cancer: Mixed Methods StudyJMIR mHealth and uHealth10.2196/5105712(e51057)Online publication date: 9-Feb-2024
  • (2024)Exploring User Perspectives on Brief Reflective Questioning Activities for Stress Management: Mixed Methods StudyJMIR Formative Research10.2196/473608(e47360)Online publication date: 8-Feb-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Reflecting on reflection: framing a design landscape

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    OZCHI '10: Proceedings of the 22nd Conference of the Computer-Human Interaction Special Interest Group of Australia on Computer-Human Interaction
    November 2010
    462 pages
    ISBN:9781450305020
    DOI:10.1145/1952222
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    • Queensland University of Technology
    • Adobe
    • Coopers and Lybrand Deloitte
    • CSIRO
    • Symplicit: Symplicit
    • Microsoft: Microsoft
    • Smart Services CRC: Smart Services CRC
    • NICTA: National Information and Communications Technology Australia
    • PTG Global: The Performance Technologies Group

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 22 November 2010

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. design guidelines
    2. learning from experience
    3. reflection
    4. reflective practice
    5. sensecam

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Conference

    OZCHI '10
    Sponsor:
    • Symplicit
    • Microsoft
    • Smart Services CRC
    • NICTA
    • PTG Global

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 362 of 729 submissions, 50%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)541
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)72
    Reflects downloads up to 22 Sep 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)Promoting Self-Efficacy of Individuals With Autism in Practicing Social Skills in the Workplace Using Virtual Reality and Physiological Sensors: Mixed Methods StudyJMIR Formative Research10.2196/521578(e52157)Online publication date: 11-Jan-2024
    • (2024)Reflective Engagement With a Digital Physical Activity Intervention Among People Living With and Beyond Breast Cancer: Mixed Methods StudyJMIR mHealth and uHealth10.2196/5105712(e51057)Online publication date: 9-Feb-2024
    • (2024)Exploring User Perspectives on Brief Reflective Questioning Activities for Stress Management: Mixed Methods StudyJMIR Formative Research10.2196/473608(e47360)Online publication date: 8-Feb-2024
    • (2024)Reflexive Data Curation: Opportunities and Challenges for Embracing Uncertainty in Human-AI CollaborationACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction10.1145/3689042Online publication date: 22-Aug-2024
    • (2024)DIY Digital Interventions: Behaviour Change with Trigger-Action ProgrammingProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36764978:MHCI(1-28)Online publication date: 24-Sep-2024
    • (2024)Identifying Characteristics of Reflection Triggers in Data Science Ethics EducationProceedings of Mensch und Computer 202410.1145/3670653.3677486(466-473)Online publication date: 1-Sep-2024
    • (2024)Enhancing Stress Understanding Through Team Reflection: Technology-Driven Insights in High-Stress Training ScenariosProceedings of the 3rd Annual Meeting of the Symposium on Human-Computer Interaction for Work10.1145/3663384.3663385(1-18)Online publication date: 25-Jun-2024
    • (2024)Flexible Minimalist Self-Tracking to Support Individual ReflectionACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction10.1145/366033931:3(1-35)Online publication date: 23-Apr-2024
    • (2024)Technology which Makes You ThinkProceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies10.1145/36596158:2(1-24)Online publication date: 15-May-2024
    • (2024)Non-judgmental Interfaces: A New Design Space for Personal InformaticsCompanion Publication of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3656156.3663706(166-170)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    Get Access

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media