Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
research-article

How Virtual Hand Representations Affect the Perceptions of Dynamic Affordances in Virtual Reality

Published: 01 May 2023 Publication History

Abstract

User representations are critical to the virtual experience, and involve both the input device used to support interactions as well as how the user is virtually represented in the scene. Inspired by previous work that has shown effects of user representations on the perceptions of relatively static affordances, we attempt to investigate how end-effector representations affect the perceptions of affordances that dynamically change over time. Towards this end, we empirically evaluated how different virtual hand representations affect users' perceptions of dynamic affordances in an object retrieval task wherein users were tasked with retrieving a target from a box for a number of trials while avoiding collisions with its moving doors. We employed a 3 (virtual end-effector representation) X 13 (frequency of moving doors) X 2 (target object size) multi-factorial design, manipulating the input modality and its concomitant virtual end-effector representation as a between-subjects factor across three experimental conditions: (1) Controller (using a controller represented as a virtual controller); (2) Controller-hand (using a controller represented as a virtual hand); (3) Glove (using a hand tracked hi-fidelity glove represented as a virtual hand). Results indicated that the controller-hand condition produced lower levels of performance than both the other conditions. Furthermore, users in this condition exhibited a diminished ability to calibrate their performance over trials. Overall, we find that representing the end-effector as a hand tends to increase embodiment but can also come at the cost of performance, or an increased workload due to a discordant mapping between the virtual representation and the input modality used. It follows that VR system designers should carefully consider the priorities and target requirements of the application being developed when choosing the type of end-effector representation for users to embody in immersive virtual experiences.

References

[1]
A. Adkins, L. Lin, A. Normoyle, R. Canales, Y. Ye, and S. Jörg. Evaluating grasping visualizations and control modes in a vr game. ACM Transactions on Applied Perception (TAP), 18(4):1–14, 2021. 2, 3.
[2]
A. Alzayat, M. Hancock, and M. A. Nacenta. Quantitative measurement of tool embodiment for virtual reality input alternatives. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1–11, 2019. 3.
[3]
M. A. Arbib, J. B. Bonaiuto, S. Jacobs, and S. H. Frey. Tool use and the distalization of the end-effector. Psychological Research PRPF, 73(4):441–462, 2009. 3.
[4]
F. Argelaguet and C. Andujar. A survey of 3d object selection techniques for virtual environments. Computers & Graphics, 37(3):121–136, 2013. 2.
[5]
F. Argelaguet, L. Hoyet, M. Trico, and A. Lécuyer. The role of interaction in virtual embodiment: Effects of the virtual hand representation. In 2016 IEEE virtual reality (VR), pp. 3–10. IEEE, 2016. 2, 3.
[6]
A. Bhargava, R. Venkatakrishnan, R. Venkatakrishnan, H. Solini, K. M. Lucaites, A. Robb, C. Pagano, and S. Babu. Did i hit the door effects of self-avatars and calibration in a person-plus-virtual-object system on perceived frontal passability in vr. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 2021. 3.
[7]
O. Blanke and T. Metzinger. Full-body illusions and minimal phenomenal selfhood. Trends in cognitive sciences, 13(1):7–13, 2009.2.
[8]
J. J. Blau and J. B. Wagman. Introduction to Ecological Psychology: A lawful approach to perceiving, acting, and cognizing. Taylor & Francis, 2022. 2, 3.
[9]
C. W. Borst and A. P. Indugula. Realistic virtual grasping. In IEEE Proceedings. VR 2005. Virtual Reality, 2005., pp. 91–98. IEEE, 2005. 2.
[10]
M. Buekers, G. Montagne, A. de Rugy, and M. Laurent. The regulation of externally paced human locomotion in virtual reality. Neuroscience Letters, 275(3):171–174, 1999. 4.
[11]
G. Caggianese, L. Gallo, and P. Neroni. The vive controllers vs. leap motion for interactions in virtual environments: a comparative evaluation. In International Conference on Intelligent Interactive Multimedia Systems and Services, pp. 24–33. Springer, 2018. 2.
[12]
R. Canales, A. Normoyle, Y. Sun, Y. Ye, M. D. Luca, and S. Jörg. Virtual grasping feedback and virtual hand ownership. In ACM Symposium on Applied Perception 2019, pp. 1–9, 2019. 2.
[13]
J. C. Castro-Alonso, P. Ayres, and F. Paas. Dynamic visualisations and motor skills. In Handbook of human centric visualization, pp. 551–580. Springer, 2014. 3.
[14]
Y.-T. Chen, C.-H. Hsu, C.-H. Chung, Y.-S. Wang, and S. V. Babu. Ivrnote: design, creation and evaluation of an interactive note-taking interface for study and reflection in vr learning environments. In 2019 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR), pp. 172–180. IEEE, 2019. 1.
[15]
B. J. Chihak, J. M. Plumert, C. J. Ziemer, S. Babu, T. Grechkin, J. F. Cremer, and J. K. Kearney. Synchronizing self and object movement: how child and adult cyclists intercept moving gaps in a virtual environment. Journal of experimental psychology: human perception and performance, 36(6):1535, 2010. 2, 4.
[16]
M. E. Cinelli, A. E. Patla, and F. Allard. Behaviour and gaze analyses during a goal-directed locomotor task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62(3):483–499, 2009. 4.
[17]
B. Day, E. Ebrahimi, L. S. Hartman, C. C. Pagano, A. C. Robb, and S. V. Babu. Examining the effects of altered avatars on perception-action in virtual reality. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 25(1): 1, 2019. 2.
[18]
F. De Vignemont. Embodiment, ownership and disownership. Consciousness and cognition, 20(1):82–93, 2011. 2.
[19]
E. Ebrahimi, L. S. Hartman, A. Robb, C. C. Pagano, and S. V. Babu. Investigating the effects of anthropomorphic fidelity of self-avatars on near field depth perception in immersive virtual environments. In 2018 IEEE conference on virtual reality and 3D user interfaces (VR), pp. 1–8. IEEE, 2018. 2, 3.
[20]
E. Ebrahimi, A. Robb, L. S. Hartman, C. C. Pagano, and S. V. Babu. Effects of anthropomorphic fidelity of self-avatars on reach boundary estimation in immersive virtual environments. In Proceedings of the 15th ACM Symposium on Applied Perception, pp. 1–8, 2018. 4.
[21]
B. R. Fajen, G. Diaz, and C. Cramer. Reconsidering the role of movement in perceiving action-scaled affordances. Human Movement Science, 30(3):504–533, 2011. 3.
[22]
B. R. Fajen and J. S. Matthis. Direct perception of action-scaled affordances: the shrinking gap problem. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 37(5):1442, 2011. 4.
[23]
S. Gallagher. Philosophical conceptions of the self: implications for cognitive science. Trends in cognitive sciences, 4(1):14–21, 2000. 2.
[24]
J. J. Gibson. The ecological approach to visual perception: classic edition. Psychology Press, 2014. 2.
[25]
T. Y. Grechkin, J. M. Plumert, and J. K. Kearney. Dynamic affordances in embodied interactive systems: The role of display and mode of locomotion. IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics, 20(4):596–605, 2014. 2, 4.
[26]
K. S. Hale and K. M. Stanney. Handbook of virtual environments: Design, implementation, and applications. CRC Press, 2014. 2.
[27]
S. G. Hart and L. E. Staveland. Development of nasa-tlx (task load index): Results of empirical and theoretical research. In Advances in psychology, vol. 52, pp. 139–183. Elsevier, 1988. 6.
[28]
W. L. Heinrichs, P. Youngblood, P. M. Harter, and P. Dev. Simulation for team training and assessment: case studies of online training with virtual worlds. World journal of surgery, 32(2):161–170, 2008. 1.
[29]
D. A. Hofmann. An overview of the logic and rationale of hierarchical linear models. Journal of management, 23(6):723–744, 1997. 6.
[30]
S. Ishak, K. E. Adolph, and G. C. Lin. Perceiving affordances for fitting through apertures. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34(6): 1501,2008. 3.
[31]
J. Jankowski and M. Hachet. A survey of interaction techniques for interactive 3d environments. In Eurographics 2013-STAR, 2013. 2.
[32]
T. Joy, E. Ugur, and I. Ayhan. Trick the body trick the mind: avatar representation affects the perception of available action possibilities in virtual reality. Virtual Reality, 26(2):615–629, 2022. 8, 9.
[33]
E. Jun, J. K. Stefanucci, S. H. Creem-Regehr, M. N. Geuss, and W. B. Thompson. Big foot: Using the size of a virtual foot to scale gap width. ACM Transactions on Applied Perception (TAP), 12(4):1–12, 2015. 3.
[34]
C. Khundam, V. Vorachart, P. Preeyawongsakul, W. Hosap, and F. Noël. A comparative study of interaction time and usability of using controllers and hand tracking in virtual reality training. In Informatics, vol. 8, p. 60. Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute, 2021. 3.
[35]
K. Kilteni, R. Groten, and M. Slater. The sense of embodiment in virtual reality. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 21(4):373–387, 2012. 2, 3.
[36]
E. Kokkinara and M. Slater. Measuring the effects through time of the influence of visuomotor and visuotactile synchronous stimulation on a virtual body ownership illusion. Perception, 43(1):43–58, 2014. 3.
[37]
P. G. Kry, A. Pihuit, A. Bernhardt, and M.-P. Cani. Handnavigator: Hands-on interaction for desktop virtual reality. In Proceedings of the 2008 ACM symposium on Virtual reality software and technology, pp. 53–60, 2008. 2.
[38]
K. E. Laver, B. Lange, S. George, J. E. Deutsch, G. Saposnik, and M. Crotty. Virtual reality for stroke rehabilitation. Cochrane database of systematic reviews, (11), 2017. 2.
[39]
M. Leyrer, S. A. Linkenauger, H. H. Bülthoff, U. Kloos, and B. Mohler. The influence of eye height and avatars on egocentric distance estimates in immersive virtual environments. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGGRAPH symposium on applied perception in graphics and visualization, pp. 67–74, 2011. 4.
[40]
L. Lin, A. Normoyle, A. Adkins, Y. Sun, A. Robb, Y. Ye, M. Di Luca, and S. Jörg. The effect of hand size and interaction modality on the virtual hand illusion. In 2019 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR), pp. 510–518. IEEE, 2019. 3.
[41]
S. A. Linkenauger, M. Leyrer, H. H. Bülthoff, and B. J. Mohler. Welcome to wonderland: The influence of the size and shape of a virtual hand on the perceived size and shape of virtual objects. PloS one, 8(7):e68594, 2013. 3.
[42]
H. Liu, Z. Wang, C. Mousas, and D. Kao. Virtual reality racket sports: Virtual drills for exercise and training. In 2020 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR), pp. 566–576. IEEE, 2020. 1.
[43]
H. Liu, Z. Zhang, X. Xie, Y. Zhu, Y. Liu, Y. Wang, and S.-C. Zhu. High-fidelity grasping in virtual reality using a glove-based system. In 2019 international conference on robotics and automation (icra), pp. 5180–5186. IEEE, 2019. 2.
[44]
B. Lok, S. Naik, M. Whitton, and F. P. Brooks. Effects of handling real objects and self-avatar fidelity on cognitive task performance and sense of presence in virtual environments. Presence, 12(6):615–628, 2003. 3.
[45]
M. R. Longo, F. Schüür, M. P. Kammers, M. Tsakiris, and P. Haggard. What is embodiment? a psychometric approach. Cognition, 107(3):978–998, 2008. 2.
[46]
C. Lougiakis, A. Katifori, M. Roussou, and I.-P. Ioannidis. Effects of virtual hand representation on interaction and embodiment in hmd-based virtual environments using controllers. In 2020 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR), pp. 510–518. IEEE, 2020. 3, 4, 8, 9.
[47]
K. M. Lucaites, R. Venkatakrishnan, R. Venkatakrishnan, A. Bhargava, and C. C. Pagano. Predictability and variability of a dynamic environment impact affordance judgments. Ecological Psychology, 32(2–3):95–114, 2020. 4, 9.
[48]
J.-L. Lugrin, M. Ertl, P. Krop, R. Klüpfel, S. Stierstorfer, B. Weisz, M. Rück, J. Schmitt, N. Schmidt, and M. E. Latoschik. Any “body” there? avatar visibility effects in a virtual reality game. In 2018 IEEE conference on virtual reality and 3D user interfaces (VR), pp. 17–24. IEEE, 2018. 3.
[49]
Manus. Wearable Manus Gloves, 2022. https://www.manus-meta.com/products/gloves. 2.
[50]
E. Matsas and G.-C. Vosniakos. Design of a virtual reality training system for human-robot collaboration in manufacturing tasks. International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM), 11(2):139–153, 2017. 2.
[51]
R. P. McMahan, A. J. D. Alon, S. Lazem, R. J. Beaton, D. Machaj, M. Schaefer, M. G. Silva, A. Leal, R. Hagan, and D. A. Bowman. Evaluating natural interaction techniques in video games. In 2010 IEEE Symposium on 3D User Interfaces (3DUI), pp. 11–14. IEEE, 2010. 3.
[52]
E. A. McManus, B. Bodenheimer, S. Streuber, S. De La Rosa, H. H. Bülthoff, and B. J. Mohler. The influence of avatar (self and character) animations on distance estimation, object interaction and locomotion in immersive virtual environments. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGGRAPH Symposium on applied perception in graphics and visualization, pp. 37–44, 2011. 2.
[53]
M. Moehring and B. Froehlich. Effective manipulation of virtual objects within arm's reach. In 2011 IEEE Virtual Reality Conference, pp. 131–138. IEEE, 2011. 2, 3.
[54]
B. J. Mohler, S. H. Creem-Regehr, W. B. Thompson, and H. H. Bülthoff. The effect of viewing a self-avatar on distance judgments in an hmd-based virtual environment. Presence, 19(3):230–242, 2010. 2, 3, 4.
[55]
D. C. Niehorster, L. Li, and M. Lappe. The accuracy and precision of position and orientation tracking in the htc vive virtual reality system for scientific research. i-Perception, 8(3):2041669517708205, 2017. 4.
[56]
Noitom. Noitom Hi5 Glove, 2022. https://www.noitom.com/hi5-vr-glove. 4.
[57]
N. Ogawa, T. Narumi, and M. Hirose. Virtual hand realism affects object size perception in body-based scaling. In 2019 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR), pp. 519–528. IEEE, 2019. 2, 3.
[58]
N. Ogawa, T. Narumi, H. Kuzuoka, and M. Hirose. Do you feel like passing through walls?: Effect of self-avatar appearance on facilitating realistic behavior in virtual environments. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1–14, 2020. 3.
[59]
E. E. O'Neal, Y. Jiang, L. J. Franzen, P. Rahimian, J. P. Yon, J. K. Kearney, and J. M. Plumert. Changes in perception-action tuning over long time scales: How children and adults perceive and act on dynamic affordances when crossing roads. Journal of experimental psychology: human perception and performance, 44(1):18, 2018. 4.
[60]
O. Ossmy and R. Mukamel. Short term motor-skill acquisition improves with size of self-controlled virtual hands. PloS one, 12(1):e0168520, 2017. 3.
[61]
C. C. Pagano and B. Day. Ecological interface design inspired by “the meaningful environment”. In Perception as Information Detection, pp. 37–50. Routledg, 2019. 9.
[62]
T. C. Peck and M. Gonzalez-Franco. Avatar embodiment. a standardized questionnaire. Frontiers in Virtual Reality, 1:575943, 2021. 6.
[63]
T. C. Peck, S. Seinfeld, S. M. Aglioti, and M. Slater. Putting yourself in the skin of a black avatar reduces implicit racial bias. Consciousness and cognition, 22(3):779–787, 2013. 3.
[64]
I. V. Piryankova, H. Y. Wong, S. A. Linkenauger, C. Stinson, M. R. Longo, H. H. Bülthoff, and B. J. Mohler. Owning an overweight or underweight body: distinguishing the physical, experienced and virtual body. PloS one, 9(8):e103428, 2014. 2, 3.
[65]
J. M. Plumert and J. K. Kearney. How do children perceive and act on dynamic affordances in crossing traffic-filled roads. Child development perspectives, 8(4):207–212, 2014. 4.
[66]
I. Poupyrev, T. Ichikawa, S. Weghorst, and M. Billinghurst. Egocentric object manipulation in virtual environments: empirical evaluation of inter-action techniques. In Computer graphics forum, vol. 17, pp. 41–52. Wiley Online Library, 1998. 2.
[67]
A. Ricca, A. Chellali, and S. Otmane. Influence of hand visualization on tool-based motor skills training in an immersive vr simulator. In 2020 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR), pp.260–268. IEEE, 2020. 3.
[68]
S. Runeson and G. Frykholm. Kinematic specification of dynamics as an informational basis for person-and-action perception: expectation, gender recognition, and deceptive intention. Journal of experimental psychology: general, 112(4), 1983. 3.
[69]
A. Schäfer, G. Reis, and D. Stricker. The gesture authoring space: Authoring customised hand gestures for grasping virtual objects in immersive virtual environments. arXiv e-prints, pp. arXiv-2207, 2022. 2, 3.
[70]
V. Schwind, P. Knierim, C. Tasci, P. Franczak, N. Haas, and N. Henze. “these are not my hands!” effect of gender on the perception of avatar hands in virtual reality. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1577–1582, 2017.4.
[71]
S. Seinfeld, T. Feuchtner, A. Maselli, and J. Müller. User representations in human-computer interaction. Human-Computer Interaction, 36(5–6):400–438,2021. 2.
[72]
S. Seinfeld, T. Feuchtner, J. Pinzek, and J. Müller. Impact of information placement and user representations in vr on performance and embodiment. IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics, pp. 1–13, 2020. 2.
[73]
G. Simpson, L. Johnston, and M. Richardson. An investigation of road crossing in a virtual environment. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 35(5):787–796, 2003. 4.
[74]
P. Skalski, R. Tamborini, A. Shelton, M. Buncher, and P. Lindmark. Mapping the road to fun: Natural video game controllers, presence, and game enjoyment. New Media & Society, 13(2):224–242, 2011. 3.
[75]
T. A. Snijders and R. J. Bosker. Multilevel analysis: An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling. sage, 2011. 6.
[76]
J. Sreng, A. Lécuyer, C. Mégard, and C. Andriot. Using visual cues of contact to improve interactive manipulation of virtual objects in industrial assembly/maintenance simulations. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 12(5):1013–1020, 2006. 2.
[77]
A. Steed, Y. Pan, F. Zisch, and W. Steptoe. The impact of a self-avatar on cognitive load in immersive virtual reality. In 2016 IEEE virtual reality (VR), pp. 67–76. IEEE, 2016. 2, 3.
[78]
J. K. Stefanucci and M. N. Geuss. Big people, little world: The body influences size perception. Perception, 38(12): 1782–1795, 2009. 3.
[79]
T. Q. Tran, H. Shin, W. Stuerzlinger, and J. Han. Effects of virtual arm representations on interaction in virtual environments. In Proceedings of the 23rd ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology, pp. 1–9, 2017. 3.
[80]
M. Tsakiris, G. Prabhu, and P. Haggard. Having a body versus moving your body: How agency structures body-ownership. Consciousness and cognition, 15(2):423–432, 2006. 2.
[81]
J. Wald and S. Taylor. Efficacy of virtual reality exposure therapy to treat driving phobia: a case report. Journal of behavior therapy and experimental psychiatry, 31(3–4):249–257, 2000. 1.
[82]
W. H. Warren. Perceiving affordances: visual guidance of stair climbing. Journal of experimental psychology: Human perception and performance, 10(5):683, 1984. 3.
[83]
W. H. Warren Jr and S. Whang. Visual guidance of walking through apertures: body-scaled information for affordances. Journal of experimental psychology: human perception and performance, 13(3):371, 1987. 3.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Exploring the Impact of Visual Scene Characteristics and Adaptation Effects on Rotation Gain Perception in VRProceedings of the 30th ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology10.1145/3641825.3687733(1-13)Online publication date: 9-Oct-2024
  • (2024)Hands or Controllers? How Input Devices and Audio Impact Collaborative Virtual RealityProceedings of the 30th ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology10.1145/3641825.3687718(1-12)Online publication date: 9-Oct-2024
  • (2024)FormationCreator: Designing A VR Dance Formation System for Intangible Cultural Heritage DanceExtended Abstracts of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613905.3651028(1-7)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics
IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics  Volume 29, Issue 5
May 2023
636 pages

Publisher

IEEE Educational Activities Department

United States

Publication History

Published: 01 May 2023

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 29 Sep 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Exploring the Impact of Visual Scene Characteristics and Adaptation Effects on Rotation Gain Perception in VRProceedings of the 30th ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology10.1145/3641825.3687733(1-13)Online publication date: 9-Oct-2024
  • (2024)Hands or Controllers? How Input Devices and Audio Impact Collaborative Virtual RealityProceedings of the 30th ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology10.1145/3641825.3687718(1-12)Online publication date: 9-Oct-2024
  • (2024)FormationCreator: Designing A VR Dance Formation System for Intangible Cultural Heritage DanceExtended Abstracts of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613905.3651028(1-7)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
  • (2024)Investigating the Effects of Avatarization and Interaction Techniques on Near-field Mixed Reality Interactions with Physical ComponentsIEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics10.1109/TVCG.2024.337205030:5(2756-2766)Online publication date: 4-Mar-2024

View Options

View options

Get Access

Login options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media