Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
research-article

Information propagation model based on hybrid social factors of opportunity, trust and motivation

Published: 14 March 2019 Publication History

Abstract

The propagation of information in the network is a complex dynamic process. Establishing an accurate information propagation model around common social factors benefits a lot from its evolution simulation for identifying the valuable information and regulating public opinions. In this paper, we propose Opportunity, Social Trust and Game Choice Motivation relying on triadic closure principle in social network and construct a novel information propagation model with respect to combine these three types of social factors. Firstly, the interest similarity between two users is convenient for measuring the opportunity to receive certain information. Secondly, the threshold of social trust is calculated by coupling users’ network influence and content contribution. Thirdly, game choice with a rule to compute the best benefits has recognized as the motivation of users to spread a message. Finally, the game choice information propagation model based on page rank algorithm (GCIP-Page Rank) is proposed. The experimental results show that information propagation led by users experiences such stages as information contact, information trust and information propagation. At the same time, users’ social trust can accelerate the spread of information in microblog social network by considering both the network structure and information content simultaneously.

References

[1]
Zhang Z., Wang Z., The data-driven null models for information dissemination tree in social networks, Physica A: Stat. Mech. Appl. 484 (2017) 394–411,.
[2]
Zhan X.X., Liu C., Zhou G., Zhang Z.K., Sun G.Q., Zhu J.J.H., Jin Z., T. Simos, Coupling dynamics of epidemic spreading and information diffusion on complex networks, Appl. Math. Comput. 332 (2018) 438–448,.
[3]
Qin Z., F. Khawar, Wan T., Collective game behavior learning with probabilistic graphical models, Neurocomputing 194 (2016) 74–86,.
[4]
Jiang C., Chen Y., Liu K.J.R., Graphical evolutionary game for information diffusion over social networks, IEEE J. Sel. Topics Signal Process. 8 (4) (2017) 524–536,.
[5]
Zinoviev D., Duong V., A game theoretical approach to broadcast information diffusion in social networks, Proceedings of the 44th Annual Simulation Symposium, ANSS'11, 2011, pp. 47–52.
[6]
Qiu W., Wang Y., Yu J., A game theoretical model of information dissemination in social network, Proceedings of the International Conference on Complex Systems, 2013, pp. 1–6,.
[7]
Kwak H., Lee C., H. Park, S.B. Moon, What is twitter, a social network or news media?, Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on World Wide Web, WWW ’10, 2010, pp. 591–600,.
[8]
S.A. Myers, J. Leskovec, The bursty dynamics of the twitter information network, Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on World Wide Web, WWW ’14, 2014, pp. 913–924,.
[9]
Li J., Wu N., Feng Z., Model-based non-gaussian interest topic distribution for user retweeting in social networks, Neurocomputing 278 (2018) 87–98,.
[10]
C.J. Hutto, S. Yardi, E. Gilbert, A longitudinal study of follow predictors on twitter, Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI ’13, 2013, pp. 821–830,.
[11]
D. Antoniades, C. Dovrolis, Co-evolutionary dynamics in social networks: a case study of twitter, Comput. Soc. Netw. 2 (1) (2015) 14,.
[12]
Wu S., Hofman J.M., Mason W.A., Watts D.J., Who says what to whom on twitter, Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on World Wide Web, WWW ’11, 2011, pp. 705–714,.
[13]
Tian Z., Zhang Q., Empirical analysis of microblog information flow features based on complex network theory, Adv. Inf. Sci. Serv. Sci. 4 (7) (2012) 163–171,.
[14]
Zhou Y., Zhang B., Sun X., Zheng Q., Liu T., Analyzing and modeling dynamics of information diffusion in microblogging social network, J. Netw. Comput. Appl. 86 (1) (2016) 92–102,.
[15]
Han W., Zhu X., Zhu Z., Chen W., Zheng W., Lu J., A comparative analysis on weibo and twitter, Tsinghua Sci. Technol. 21 (1) (2016) 1–16,.
[16]
Guan W., Gao H., Yang M., Li Y., Ma H., Qian W., Cao Z., Yang X., Analyzing user behavior of the micro-blogging website sina weibo during hot social events, Physica A: Stat. Mech. Appl. 395 (4) (2014) 340–351,.
[17]
Zhang Z., Wang H., Wang C., Fang H., Modeling epidemics spreading on social contact networks, IEEE Trans. Emerg. Topics Comput. 3 (3) (2015) 410–419,.
[18]
Li C., Jiang G., Song Y., Xia L., Li Y., Song B., Modeling and analysis of epidemic spreading on community networks with heterogeneity, J. Parallel Distrib. Comput. 119 (2018) 136–145,.
[19]
Zhang X., Chang S., Shi Q., Huo H., Qualitative study of a stochastic sis epidemic model with vertical transmission, Physica A: Stat. Mech. Appl. 505 (2018) 805–817,.
[20]
Kuniya T., Wang J., Global dynamics of an sir epidemic model with nonlocal diffusion, Nonlinear Anal. Real World Appl. 43 (2018) 262–282,.
[21]
M.E. Newman, Spread of epidemic disease on networks, Phys. Rev. E: Stat. Nonlinear Soft Matter Phys. 66 (1 Pt 2) (2002) 016128,.
[22]
J. Leskovec, M. Mcglohon, C. Faloutsos, N. Glance, M. Hurst, Patterns of cascading behavior in large blog graphs, Proceedings of the 2007 International Conference on Data Mining, 2007, pp. 551–556,.
[23]
Xiao Y., Song C., Liu Y., Social hotspot propagation dynamics model based on multidimensional attributes and evolutionary games, Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul. 67 (2019) 13–25,.
[24]
Zhao Y., Kou G., Peng Y., Chen Y., Understanding influence power of opinion leaders in e-commerce networks: an opinion dynamics theory perspective, Inf. Sci. 426 (2018) 131–147,.
[25]
E. Bakshy, J.M. Hofman, W.A. Mason, D.J. Watts, Everyone’s an influencer: quantifying influence on twitter, Proceedings of the 4th ACM international conference on Web search and data mining, WSDM ’11, 2011, pp. 65–74,.
[26]
Cha M., H. Haddadi, F. Benevenuto, P.K. Gummadi, Measuring user influence in twitter: The million follower fallacy, Proceedings of the 4th International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, ICWSM’ 10, 2010.
[27]
D.M. Romero, W. Galuba, S. Asur, B.A. Huberman, Influence and passivity in social media, Proceedings of the 20th International Conference Companion on World Wide Web, WWW ’11, 2011, pp. 113–114,.
[28]
S.A. Ros, F. Aguilera, J.D. Nuez-Gonzalez, M. Graa, Semantically enhanced network analysis for influencer identification in online social networks, Neurocomputing (2017),.
[29]
Yang L., Qiao Y., Liu Z., Ma J., Li X., Identifying opinion leader nodes in online social networks with a new closeness evaluation algorithm, Soft Comput. 22 (2) (2018) 453–464,.
[30]
Zhao Y., Li S., Jin F., Identification of influential nodes in social networks with community structure based on label propagation, Neurocomputing 210 (2016) 34–44,.
[31]
O. Biran, S. Rosenthal, J. Andreas, kathleen McKeown, O. Ranbow, Detecting influencers in written online conversations, Proceedings of the 20th International Conference Companion on World Wide Web, WWW ’11, 2012, pp. 37–45.
[32]
J. Goldenberg, Han S., D.R. Lehmann, Hong J.W., The role of hubs in the adoption process, J. Mark. 73 (2) (2009) 1–13,.
[33]
E. Kelly, B. Davis, J. Nelson, J. Mendoza, Leader emergence in an internet environment, Comput. Hum.Behav. 24 (5) (2008) 2372–2383,.
[34]
F. Bodendorf, C. Kaiser, Detecting opinion leaders and trends in online social networks, Proceedings of the 2nd ACM Workshop on Social Web Search and Mining, SWSM ’09, 2009, pp. 65–68,.
[35]
Liu X., Liu C., Information diffusion and opinion leader mathematical modeling based on microblog, IEEE Access 6 (2018) 34736–34745,.
[36]
Yong S.K., V.L. Tran, Assessing the ripple effects of online opinion leaders with trust and distrust metrics, Expert Syst. Appl. 40 (9) (2013) 3500–3511,.
[37]
F.J. Ortega, C.G. Vallejo, Propagation of trust and distrust for the detection of trolls in a social network, Comput. Netw. 56 (12) (2012) 2884–2895,.
[38]
Wan J., Chen X., Du Y., Jia M., Information diffusion model based on opportunity, trust and motivation, Proceedings of the China Conference on Information Retrieval, CCIR ’18, 2018, pp. 185–197,.
[39]
S. Jafari, H. Navidi, A game-theoretic approach for modeling competitive diffusion over social networks, Games 9 (1) (2018) 8–20,.
[40]
Liu G., Zhu F., Zheng K., Liu A., Li Z., Zhao L., Zhou X., Tosi: a trust-oriented social influence evaluation method in contextual social networks, Neurocomputing 210 (2016) 130–140,.
[41]
B. Chandran, B. Golden, E. Wasil, Linear programming models for estimating weights in the analytic hierarchy process, Comput. Oper. Res. 32 (9) (2005) 2235–2254,.
[42]
A. Goyal, F. Bonchi, L.V.S. Lakshmanan, Learning influence probabilities in social networks, Proceedings of the 3rd ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining, WSDM ’10, 2010, pp. 241–250,.
[43]
Li D., Xu Z., Luo Y., Li S., A. Gupta, K. Sycara, Luo S., Hu L., Chen H., Modeling information diffusion over social networks for temporal dynamic prediction, IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 29 (9) (2017) 1985–1997,.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Blockchain-based autonomous decentralized trust management for social networkThe Journal of Supercomputing10.1007/s11227-024-06024-w80:10(14725-14751)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
  • (2024)Modeling the dissemination of privacy information in online social networksTransactions on Emerging Telecommunications Technologies10.1002/ett.498935:6Online publication date: 9-Jun-2024
  • (2023)A novel approach based on rough set theory for analyzing information disorderApplied Intelligence10.1007/s10489-022-04283-953:12(15993-16014)Online publication date: 1-Jun-2023
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Neurocomputing
Neurocomputing  Volume 333, Issue C
Mar 2019
452 pages

Publisher

Elsevier Science Publishers B. V.

Netherlands

Publication History

Published: 14 March 2019

Author Tags

  1. Social network
  2. Information propagation
  3. Social factors
  4. Social trust
  5. Game choice motivation

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 27 Feb 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Blockchain-based autonomous decentralized trust management for social networkThe Journal of Supercomputing10.1007/s11227-024-06024-w80:10(14725-14751)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
  • (2024)Modeling the dissemination of privacy information in online social networksTransactions on Emerging Telecommunications Technologies10.1002/ett.498935:6Online publication date: 9-Jun-2024
  • (2023)A novel approach based on rough set theory for analyzing information disorderApplied Intelligence10.1007/s10489-022-04283-953:12(15993-16014)Online publication date: 1-Jun-2023
  • (2023)DNETC: dynamic network embedding preserving both triadic closure evolution and community structuresKnowledge and Information Systems10.1007/s10115-022-01792-465:3(1129-1157)Online publication date: 1-Mar-2023
  • (2022)A Multi-Source Information Dissemination Model Based on Edge Evolution GameProceedings of the 2022 5th International Conference on Machine Learning and Machine Intelligence10.1145/3568199.3568226(166-174)Online publication date: 23-Sep-2022

View Options

View options

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media