Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
research-article

Perceived conversational ability of task-based chatbots – Which conversational elements influence the success of text-based dialogues?

Published: 27 February 2024 Publication History

Abstract

The use of text-based chatbots offering individual support to customers has increased steadily in recent years. However, thus far, research has focused on comparing text-based chatbots with either each other or with humans, whilst the investigation of task-based dialogues has been scarce. This paper aims to identify the characteristics of dialogues – that is, conversational elements – that lead to a successful task-based conversation. For this purpose, the chatbot, KIM, by MAGGI Kochstudio was used. It was designed to help customers find a recipe tailored to their individual needs. In order to investigate which conversational elements contribute to successful communication between the user and the chatbot KIM, a usability study collecting 123 unstructured dialogues and a scenario-based experiment using four dialogues with 627 respondents was conducted. The quantitative analysis demonstrates that task completion is characterized by a higher perception of the chatbot’s conversational ability and user satisfaction. The chatbot should propose correct recipe suggestions following a short dialogue, without the user needing to provide too much input. Based on these findings, we recommended equipping the skillset of task-based chatbots with elements that will complement their assistive qualities – for example, improved use of standard phrases, and reactions to similar domains and non-requests. Gender-specific differences in task completion should be considered.

Highlights

An overview on task-based chatbots and their text-based conversation is given.
Potential text-based conversation characteristics are identified.
A usability study and a scenario-based experiment are conducted and analysed.
The conversation ability of the chatbot is internally and externally evaluated.
Findings reflect the importance of correct answers and short dialogues.

References

[1]
A. Abdellatif, K. Badran, D.E. Costa, E. Shihab, A comparison of natural language understanding platforms for chatbots in software engineering, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 48 (8) (2022) 3087–3102,.
[2]
M. Adam, M. Wessel, A. Benlian, Ai-based chatbots in customer service and their effects on user compliance, Electronic Markets 31 (2) (2021) 427–445,.
[3]
E. Adamopoulou, L. Moussiades, Chatbots: History, technology, and applications, Machine Learning with Applications 2 (2020),.
[5]
A. Beattie, A.P. Edwards, C. Edwards, A bot and a smile: Interpersonal impressions of chatbots and humans using emoji in computer-mediated communication, Communication Studies 71 (3) (2020) 409–427,.
[6]
F. Brachten, T. Kissmer, S. Stieglitz, The acceptance of chatbots in an enterprise context – A survey study, International Journal of Information Management 60 (2021),.
[7]
G. Caldarini, S. Jaf, K. McGarry, A literature survey of recent advances in chatbots, Information 13 (1) (2022) 41,.
[8]
J. Casas, M.‑O. Tricot, O. Abou Khaled, E. Mugellini, P. Cudré-Mauroux, Trends & methods in chatbot evaluation. Companion Publication of the 2020 International Conference on Multimodal Interaction, ACM, 2020, pp. 280–286,.
[9]
Castle-Green, T., Reeves, S., Fischer, J.E., & Koleva, B. (2020). Decision Trees as Sociotechnical Objects in Chatbot Design. Proceedings of the 2nd Conference on Conversational User Interfaces, 1–3. https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.1145/3405755.3406133.
[10]
S. Chaiken, Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 39 (5) (1980) 752–766,.
[11]
A.P. Chaves, M.A. Gerosa, Single or multiple conversational agents? An interactional coherence comparison. Proceedings of the 2018 CHI, Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, article 191 (2018) 1–13,.
[12]
A.P. Chaves, M.A. Gerosa, How should my chatbot interact? A survey on social characteristics in human–chatbot interaction design, International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction 37 (8) (2021) 729–758,.
[13]
Y.‑H. Cheng, H.‑Y. Ho, Social influence's impact on reader perceptions of online reviews, Journal of Business Research 68 (4) (2015) 883–887,.
[14]
M. Chung, E. Ko, H. Joung, S.J. Kim, Chatbot e-service and customer satisfaction regarding luxury brands, Journal of Business Research 117 (2020) 587–595,.
[15]
L. Clark, N. Pantidi, O. Cooney, P. Doyle, D. Garaialde, J. Edwards, …., B.R. Cowan, What Makes a Good Conversation?, in: S. Brewster, G. Fitzpatrick, A. Cox, V. Kostakos (Eds.), ACM Digital Library, Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, article 475, Association for Computing Machinery, 2019, pp. 1–12,.
[16]
Dai, H., Liu, Z., Liao, W., Huang, X., Cao, Y., Wu, Z., Zhao, L., Xu, S., Liu, W., Liu, N., Li, S., Zhu, D., Cai, H., Sun, L., Li, Q., Shen, D., Liu, T., & Li, X. AugGPT: Leveraging ChatGPT for Text Data Augmentation (arXiv Preprint) 2023T.〈https://arxiv.org/pdf/2302.13007〉.
[17]
A. Dall’Acqua, F. Tamburini, Toward a linguistically grounded dialog model for chatbot design, Italian Journal of Computational Linguistics 7 (1 | 2) (2021) 191–222,.
[18]
S. Das, E. Kumar, Determining accuracy of chatbot by applying algorithm design and defined process, 2018 4th International Conference on Computing Communication and Automation (ICCCA), IEEE, 2018,.
[19]
P. Drew, Turn design, in: J. Sidnell, T. Stivers (Eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis, Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester, 2013, pp. 131–149.
[20]
Y.K. Dwivedi, N. Kshetri, L. Hughes, E.L. Slade, A. Jeyaraj, A.K. Kar, A.M. Baabdullah, A. Koohang, V. Raghavan, M. Ahuja, H. Albanna, M.A. Albashrawi, A.S. Al-Busaidi, J. Balakrishnan, Y. Barlette, S. Basu, I. Bose, L. Brooks, D. Buhalis, R. Wright, “So what if ChatGPT wrote it?” Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy, International Journal of Information Management 71 (2023),.
[21]
M. Eisend, Source credibility dimensions in marketing communication – A generalized solution, Journal of Empirical Generalisations in Marketing Science 10 (2) (2006) 〈https://www.empgens.com/article/source-credibility-dimensions-in-marketing-communication-a-generalized-solution/〉.
[22]
T. Endrass, J. Klawohn, R. Gruetzmann, M. Ischebeck, N. Kathmann, Response-related negativities following correct and incorrect responses: Evidence from a temporospatial principal component analysis, Psychophysiology 49 (6) (2012) 733–743,.
[23]
N. Epley, A. Waytz, J.T. Cacioppo, On seeing human: A three-factor theory of anthropomorphism, Psychological Review 114 (4) (2007) 864–886,.
[24]
J. Epstein, W. Klinkenberg, From Eliza to Internet: a brief history of computerized assessment, Computers in Human Behavior 17 (3) (2001) 295–314,.
[25]
J. Feine, S. Morana, U. Gnewuch, Measuring service encounter satisfaction with customer service chatbots using sentiment analysis, Wirtschaftsinformatik 2019 Proceedings (2019) 〈https://aisel.aisnet.org/wi2019/track10/papers/2〉.
[26]
J. Feine, U. Gnewuch, S. Morana, A. Maedche, A taxonomy of social cues for conversational agents, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 132 (2019) 138–161,.
[27]
A. Følstad, M. Skjuve, Chatbots for customer service, Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Conversational User Interfaces - CUI '19, ACM Press, 2019,.
[28]
A. Følstad, C. Taylor, Conversational repair in chatbots for customer service: The effect of expressing uncertainty and suggesting alternatives, A. Følstad, T. Araujo, S. Papadopoulos, E.L.-C. Law, O.-C. Granmo, E. Luger, P.B. Brandtzaeg (Eds.), Chatbot Research and Design: Third International Workshop, CONVERSATIONS 2019, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, November 19–20, 2019, Revised Selected Papers. Springer eBook Collection, 11970, Springer, Cham, 2020, pp. 201–214.
[29]
A. Følstad, M. Skjuve, P.B. Brandtzaeg, Different chatbots for different purposes: towards a typology of chatbots to understand interaction design, in: S.S. Bodrunova, O. Koltsova, A. Følstad, H. Halpin, P. Kolozaridi, L. Yuldashev, …., H. Niedermayer (Eds.), Internet Science. INSCI 2018 International Workshops, St. Petersburg, Russia, October 24-26, 2018, Revised Selected Papers, Springer, Cham, 2019, pp. 145–156.
[30]
D. Fomina, Chatbot horror: How conversational apps ruin customer experience, Voice UI (2019) 〈https://medium.com/voiceui/chatbot-horror-how-conversational-apps-ruin-customer-experience-5139f082a613〉.
[31]
E. Frøkjær, M. Hertzum, K. Hornbæk, Measuring usability, in: T. Turner, S. Pemberton (Eds.), CHI 2000: The future is here: CHI 2000 conference proceedings: conference on human factors in computing systems, ACM Press, New York, NY, 2000, pp. 345–352,.
[32]
Gao, M., Liu, X., Xu, A., & Akkiraju, R. (2021). Chatbot or chat-blocker: Predicting chatbot popularity before deployment. Designing Interactive Systems Conference 2021 (pp. 1458-1469). ACM.
[33]
E. Gilmartin, B.R. Cowan, C. Vogel, N. Campbell, Explorations in multiparty casual social talk and its relevance for social human machine dialogue, Journal on Multimodal User Interfaces 12 (4) (2018) 297–308,.
[34]
A.C. Graesser, D.S. McNamara, J.M. Kulikowich, Coh-Metrix, Educational Researcher 40 (5) (2011) 223–234,.
[35]
Hassenzahl, M. (2003). The thing and I: Understanding the relationship between user and product. In Blythe, M.A., Overbeeke, K., Monk, A.F., & Wright, P.C. (Eds.), Funology: From Usability to Enjoyment (pp. 31–42). Human-Computer Interaction Series vol 3, Dordrecht:Springer.
[36]
I.K.F. Haugeland, A. Følstad, C. Taylor, C.A. Bjørkli, Understanding the user experience of customer service chatbots: An experimental study of chatbot interaction design, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 161 (2022),.
[37]
M. Haugh, Conversational interaction, in: K. Allan, K.M. Jaszczolt (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Pragmatics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2012, pp. 251–274,.
[38]
A.F. Hayes, K. Krippendorff, Answering the call for a standard reliability measure for coding data, Communication Methods and Measures 1 (1) (2007) 77–89,.
[39]
S.C. Herring, Interactional coherence in CMC, Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences (HICSS) (1999) 1–13. 〈https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/772674〉.
[40]
S.C. Herring, New Research for New Media, Innovative Research Methodologies Symposium Working Papers and Readings, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, 2003, pp. 47–66.
[41]
J. Hill, W. Randolph Ford, I.G. Farreras, Real conversations with artificial intelligence: A comparison between human–human online conversations and human–chatbot conversations, Computers in Human Behavior 49 (2015) 245–250,.
[42]
E.M. Hoey, K.H. Kendrick, Conversation Analysis, in: A.M. de Groot, P. Hagoort (Eds.), Research Methods in Psycholinguistics: A Practical Guide, Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester, 2017, pp. 151–173.
[43]
K. Hornbæk, Current practice in measuring usability: Challenges to usability studies and research, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 64 (2) (2006) 79–102,.
[44]
V. Hung, M. Elvir, A. Gonzalez, R. DeMara, Towards a method for evaluating naturalness in conversational dialog systems, 2009 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, IEEE, 2009,.
[45]
S. Hussain, O. Ameri Sianaki, N. Ababneh, A survey on conversational agents/chatbots classification and design techniques, L. Barolli, M. Takizawa, F. Xhafa, T. Enokido (Eds.), Web, Artificial Intelligence and Network Applications: Proceedings of the Workshops of the 33rd International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications (WAINA-2019). Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC), Vol. 927, Springer, Cham, 2019, pp. 946–956,.
[46]
Jadeja, M., & Varia, N. (2017). Perspectives for Evaluating Conversational AI (arXiv Preprint) (https://arxiv.org/pdf/1709.04734.pdf).
[47]
M. Jain, P. Kumar, R. Kota, S.N. Patel, Evaluating and informing the design of chatbots, Proceedings of the 2018 Designing Interactive Systems Conference, ACM, 2018,.
[48]
Johnson, K. (2018, May 1). Facebook Messenger passes 300,000 bots. 〈https://venturebeat.com/2018/05/01/facebook-messenger-passes-300000-bots/〉.
[49]
Jovic, D. (2020, November 20). The future is now - 37 fascinating chatbot statistics. 〈https://www.smallbizgenius.net/by-the-numbers/chatbot-statistics/#gref〉.
[50]
Jurafsky, D., & Martin, J.H. Chatbots & dialogue systems Jurafsky D., Martin J.H. Speech and Language Processing: An Introduction to Natural Language Processing, Computational Linguistics, and Speech Recognition 3rd draft ed. 2021 1 39.〈https://web.stanford.edu/∼jurafsky/slp3/24.pdf〉.
[51]
G. Kasper, J. Wagner, Conversation analysis in applied linguistics, Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 34 (2014) 171–212,.
[52]
L. Kim, 11 amazing facts you might not know about chatbots, Marketing and Entrepreneurship (2017) 〈https://medium.com/marketing-and-entrepreneurship/11-amazing-facts-you-might-not-know-about-chatbots-8cdf331181f8〉.
[53]
A. Koubaa, W. Boulila, L. Ghouti, A. Alzahem, S. Latif, Exploring ChatGPT capabilities and limitations: A critical review of the NLP game changer, Preprints 2023 (2023),.
[54]
K. Kuligowska, Commercial Chatbot: Performance Evaluation, Usability Metrics and Quality Standards of Embodied Conversational Agents, Professionals Center for Business Research 2 (2015) https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2569637.
[55]
K. Kvale, O.A. Sell, S. Hodnebrog, A. Følstad, Improving conversations: Lessons learnt from manual analysis of chatbot dialogues, in: A. Følstad, T. Araujo, S. Papadopoulos, E.L.-C. Law, O.-C. Granmo, E. Luger, P.B. Brandtzaeg (Eds.), Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Chatbot Research and Design: Third International Workshop, CONVERSATIONS 2019, Springer, Cham, 2020, pp. 187–200,.
[56]
S.C. Levinson, Pragmatics, University Press, Cambridge, 1983,.
[57]
C. Licoppe, Skype and domestic settings, Pragmatics 27 (3) (2017) 351–386,.
[58]
V. Logacheva, M. Burtsev, V. Malykh, V. Polulyakh, A. Seliverstov, Convai dataset of topic-oriented human-to-chatbot dialogues, in: S. Escalera, M. Weimer (Eds.), The Springer Series on Challenges in Machine Learning (SSCML). The NIPS ’17 Competition, in: Building Intelligent Systems, Springer, Cham, 2018, pp. 47–57,.
[59]
C.L. Lortie, M.J. Guitton, Judgment of the humanness of an interlocutor is in the eye of the beholder, PLOS ONE 6 (9) (2011),.
[60]
E. Luger, A. Sellen, "Like having a really bad PA": The gulf between user expectation and experience of conversational agents, Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2016) 5286–5297,.
[61]
E. Maier, M. Mast, S. LuperFoy, E. Maier, M. Mast, S. LuperFoy (Eds.), Dialogue Processing in Spoken Language Systems ECAI’96 Workshop, 1236, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1997, pp. 1–13,. Lecture Notes in Computer Science.
[62]
M.F McTear, The rise of the conversational interface. A New Kid on the Block?, in: J.F. Quesada, F.J. Martín Mateos, T. López Soto (Eds.), Future and Emerging Trends in Language Technology. Machine Learning and Big Data. FETLT 2016, in: Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 10341, Springer, Cham, 2016, pp. 38–49,.
[63]
Min, B., Ross, H., Sulem, E., Veyseh, A.P. B., Nguyen, T.H., Sainz, O., Agirre, E., Heinz, I., & Roth, D. (2021). Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing via Large Pre-Trained Language Models: A Survey. (arXiv Preprint) (https://arxiv.org/pdf/2111.01243).
[64]
K. Morrissey, J. Kirakowski, ‘Realness’ in Chatbots: Establishing Quantifiable Criteria, in: K. Masaaki (Ed.), Human-Computer Interaction, in: Interaction Modalities and Techniques. HCI 2013 Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 8007, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2013, pp. 87–96,.
[65]
Y. Mou, K. Xu, The media inequality: Comparing the initial human-human and human-AI social interactions, Computers in Human Behavior 72 (2017) 432–440,.
[66]
Mudambi, Schuff, Research note: What makes a helpful online review? A study of customer reviews on Amazon.com, MIS Quarterly 34 (1) (2010) 185,.
[67]
C. Nass, Y. Moon, Machines and mindlessness: Social responses to computers, Journal of Social Issues 56 (1) (2000) 81–103,.
[68]
C. Nass, J. Steuer, E.R. Tauber, Computers are social actors, In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems celebrating interdependence - CHI '94. , ACM Press, 1994,.
[69]
M. Neururer, S. Schlögl, L. Brinkschulte, A. Groth, Perceptions on Authenticity in Chat Bots, Multimodal Technologies and Interaction 2 (3) (2018) 60,.
[70]
K. Nimavat, T. Champaneria, Chatbots: An overview. Types, architecture, tools and future possibilities, International Journal for Scientific Research & Development 5 (7) (2017) 1019–1024.
[71]
Paakki. H.K. Conceptualizing Human-Computer Intersubjectivity to Develop Computational Humor 2021.https://computationalcreativity.net/iccc21/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/iccc_2021_paper_30.pdf.
[72]
M. Park, M. Aiken, L. Salvador, How do humans interact with chatbots? An analysis of transcripts, International Journal of Management and Information Technology 14 (2018) 3338–3350,.
[73]
M. Park, M. Aiken, M. Vanjan, Evaluating the knowledge of conversational agents, Southwestern Business Administration Journal 17 (1) (2018) 3. 〈https://digitalscholarship.tsu.edu/sbaj/vol17/iss1/3/〉.
[74]
T. Paulus, A. Warren, J.N. Lester, Applying conversation analysis methods to online talk: A literature review, Discourse, Context & Media 12 (2016) 1–10,.
[75]
L. Piccolo, M. Mensio, H. Alani, Chasing the chatbots: Directions for interaction and design research, in: S.S. Bodrunova, O. Koltsova, A. Følstad, H. Halpin, P. Kolozaridi, L. Yuldashev, …., H. Niedermayer (Eds.), Internet Science. INSCI 2018 International Workshops, St. Petersburg, Russia, Springer, Cham, 2019, pp. 157–169,.
[76]
A. Przegalinska, L. Ciechanowski, A. Stroz, P. Gloor, G. Mazurek, In bot we trust: A new methodology of chatbot performance measures, Business Horizons 62 (6) (2019) 785–797,.
[77]
Radziwill, N.M., & Benton, M.C. (2017). Evaluating Quality of Chatbots and Intelligent Conversational Agents. (arXiv Preprint) (https://arxiv.org/abs/1704.04579).
[78]
A. Rapp, L. Curti, A. Boldi, The human side of human-chatbot interaction: A systematic literature review of ten years of research on text-based chatbots, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 151 (2021),.
[79]
A. Rese, L. Ganster, D. Baier, Chatbots in retailers’ customer communication: How to measure their acceptance?, Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services 56 (2020),.
[80]
A. Rivolli, C. Amaral, L. Guardão, C.R. de Sá, C. Soares, Knowbots: Discovering relevant patterns in chatbot dialogues, in: P.K. Novak, T. Šmuc, S. Džeroski (Eds.), International Conference on Discovery Science, Springer, Cham, 2019, pp. 481–492,.
[81]
H. Sacks, E.A. Schegloff, G. Jeffersion, A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation, Language 50 (4) (1974) 696–735,.
[82]
M. Santini, Web pages, text types, and linguistic features: Some issues, ICAME Journal 30 (2006) 67–86,.
[83]
G.A. Santos, G.G. de Andrade, G.R.S. Silva, F.C.M. Duarte, J.P.J. Da Costa, R.T. de Sousa, A conversation-driven approach for chatbot management, IEEE Access 10 (2022) 8474–8486,.
[84]
S. Schanke, G. Burtch, G. Ray, Estimating the impact of “humanizing” customer service chatbots, Information Systems Research 32 (3) (2021) 736–751,.
[85]
E.A. Schegloff, H. Sacks, Opening up Closings, Semiotica 8 (4) (1973) 289–327,.
[86]
G. Schraw, A conceptual analysis of five measures of metacognitive monitoring, Metacognition and Learning 4 (1) (2009) 33–45,.
[87]
R.M. Schuetzler, G.M. Grimes, J. Scott Giboney, The impact of chatbot conversational skill on engagement and perceived humanness, Journal of Management Information Systems 37 (3) (2020) 875–900,.
[88]
H. Shah, K. Warwick, J. Vallverdú, D. Wu, Can machines talk? Comparison of Eliza with modern dialogue systems, Computers in Human Behavior 58 (2016) 278–295,.
[89]
B.A. Shawar, E. Atwel, Different measurement metrics to evaluate a chatbot system, Proceedings of the Workshop on Bridging the Gap: Academic and Industrial Research in Dialog Technologies (2007) 89–96. 〈https://aclanthology.org/w07-0313.pdf〉.
[90]
N. Shechtman, L.M. Horowitz, Media inequality in conversation: how people behave differently when interacting with computers and people, Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2003) 281–288,.
[91]
H. Shum, X. He, Di Li, From Eliza to XiaoIce: Challenges and opportunities with social chatbots, Frontiers of Information Technology & Electronic Engineering 19 (1) (2018) 10–26,.
[92]
M. Söderlund, Service robots with (perceived) theory of mind: An examination of humans’ reactions, Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services 67 (2022),.
[93]
M. Söderlund, E.‑L. Oikarinen, Service encounters with virtual agents: An examination of perceived humanness as a source of customer satisfaction, European Journal of Marketing 55 (13) (2021) 94–121,.
[94]
P.R. Spence, D. Westerman, C. Edwards, A. Edwards, Welcoming Our Robot Overlords: Initial Expectations About Interaction With a Robot, Communication Research Reports 31 (3) (2014) 272–280,.
[95]
S.E. Stemler, A comparison of consensus, consistency, and measurement approaches to estimating interrater reliability, Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation 9 (1) (2004) 〈https://scholarworks.umass.edu/pare/vol9/iss1/4/〉.
[96]
Sullivan, L. (2017, February 22). Facebook chatbots hit 70% failure rate as consumers warm up to the tech. Mediapost. 〈https://www.mediapost.com/publications/article/295718/〉.
[97]
V. Taecharungroj, “What Can ChatGPT Do?” Analyzing Early Reactions to the Innovative AI Chatbot on Twitter, Big Data and Cognitive Computing 7 (1) (2023) 35,.
[98]
C. Thorne, Chatbots for troubleshooting: A survey, Language and Linguistics Compass 11 (10) (2017),.
[99]
A. Uchendu, J. Cao, Q. Wang, B. Luo, D. Lee, Characterizing Man-made vs. Machine-made Chatbot Dialogs, In Proceedings of the Conference for Truth and Trust Online 2019. , TTO Conference Ltd., 2019,.
[100]
M. Ullsperger, D.Y. von Cramon, Subprocesses of performance monitoring: A dissociation of error processing and response competition revealed by event-related fMRI and ERPs, NeuroImage 14 (6) (2001) 1387–1401,.
[101]
A. Vaswani, N. Shazeer, N. Parmar, J. Uszkoreit, L. Jones, A.N. Gomez, …., I. Polosukhin, Attention is all you need, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 30 (2017) https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper/2017/file/3f5ee243547dee91fbd053c1c4a845aa-Paper.pdf.
[102]
V. Venkatesh, M.G. Morris, G.B. Davis, F.D. Davis, User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view, MIS Quarterly 27 (3) (2003) 425–478,.
[103]
E. Ventola, The structure of casual conversation in english, Journal of Pragmatics 3 (3–4) (1979) 267–298,.
[104]
T. Verhagen, J. van Nes, F. Feldberg, W. van Dolen, Virtual customer service agents: Using social presence and personalization to shape online service encounters, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 19 (3) (2014) 529–545,.
[105]
S. Verma, L. Sahni, M. Sharma, Comparative analysis of chatbots, Proceedings of the International Conference on Innovative Computing & Communications (ICICC) Advance Online Publication (2020),.
[106]
Walker, M.A., Litman, D.J., Kamm, C.A., & Abella, A. (1997). PARADISE: A Framework for Evaluating Spoken Dialogue Agents (arXiv Preprint) (https://arxiv.org/abs/cmp-lg/9704004).
[108]
J. Wang, L. Gu, M. Aiken, A comparison of three conversational agents, Asian Journal of Science and Technology 10 (9) (2019) 10051–10055,.
[109]
Wang, L., Mujib, M.I., Williams, J., Demiris, G., & Huh-Yoo, J. (2021). An Evaluation of Generative Pre-Training Model-based Therapy Chatbot for Caregivers (ArXiv Preprint). (https://arxiv.org/abs/2107.13115).
[110]
Wang, Y.‑C., Papangelis, A., Wang, R., Feizollahi, Z., Tur, G., & Kraut, R. (2020). Can you be more social? Injecting Politeness and Positivity into Taskent--Oriented Conversational Agents (ArXiv Preprint). (https://arxiv.org/abs/2012.14653).
[111]
K. Warwick, H. Shah, Turing’s imitation game, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016,.
[112]
J. Weizenbaum, Eliza—A computer program for the study of natural language communication between man and machine, Communications of the ACM 9 (1) (1966) 36–45,.
[113]
H. Yun, A. Ham, J. [Jin] Kim, T. Kim, J. [Jeongeun] Kim, H. Lee, J. Park, J. Jang, Chatbot with touch and graphics, in: M.I. Torres (Ed.), ACM Digital Library, Proceedings of the 2nd Conference on Conversational User Interfaces, Association for Computing Machinery, 2020, pp. 1–5,.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)GRILLBot In Practice: Lessons and Tradeoffs Deploying Large Language Models for Adaptable Conversational Task AssistantsProceedings of the 30th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining10.1145/3637528.3671622(4951-4961)Online publication date: 25-Aug-2024
  • (2024)The effect of the anthropomorphic design of chatbots on customer switching intention when the chatbot service failsInternational Journal of Information Management: The Journal for Information Professionals10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2024.10276776:COnline publication date: 17-Jul-2024
  • (2024)Artificial intelligence vs. autonomous decision-making in streaming platformsInternational Journal of Information Management: The Journal for Information Professionals10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.10274876:COnline publication date: 17-Jul-2024

Index Terms

  1. Perceived conversational ability of task-based chatbots – Which conversational elements influence the success of text-based dialogues?
    Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image International Journal of Information Management: The Journal for Information Professionals
    International Journal of Information Management: The Journal for Information Professionals  Volume 74, Issue C
    Feb 2024
    214 pages

    Publisher

    Elsevier Science Publishers B. V.

    Netherlands

    Publication History

    Published: 27 February 2024

    Author Tags

    1. Text-based chatbots
    2. Task-based chatbots
    3. Conversational ability
    4. Task completion
    5. Conversational elements
    6. Structural conversation analysis
    7. Conversational ability score
    8. User satisfaction

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
    Reflects downloads up to 18 Nov 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)GRILLBot In Practice: Lessons and Tradeoffs Deploying Large Language Models for Adaptable Conversational Task AssistantsProceedings of the 30th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining10.1145/3637528.3671622(4951-4961)Online publication date: 25-Aug-2024
    • (2024)The effect of the anthropomorphic design of chatbots on customer switching intention when the chatbot service failsInternational Journal of Information Management: The Journal for Information Professionals10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2024.10276776:COnline publication date: 17-Jul-2024
    • (2024)Artificial intelligence vs. autonomous decision-making in streaming platformsInternational Journal of Information Management: The Journal for Information Professionals10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.10274876:COnline publication date: 17-Jul-2024

    View Options

    View options

    Login options

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media