Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
research-article

Avatar-driven self-disclosure

Published: 01 September 2014 Publication History

Abstract

The effect of avatar-self similarity on self-disclosure was examined.Self-awareness, self-presence, and identifiability are mediators.Avatar similarity increases self-disclosure via self-awareness and self-presence.Avatar similarity decreases self-disclosure via identifiability. Considering the importance of self-disclosure in building relationships and bonds, it is vital to investigate how self-disclosure is affected by avatars utilized in many online communities. In this study, we tested a research model that explores how perceived avatar-self similarity affects self-disclosure via different theoretical constructs such as self-awareness, self-presence, and identifiability. The research model was empirically tested with data from a web-based survey of 209 Second Life users. Results revealed that avatar similarity impacts self-disclosure but with varying effects, depending on how it is mediated by variables of identifiability, self-awareness and self-presence. Specifically, appearance similarity affects homophily, which heightens self-awareness. This results in increased feelings of self-presence, which positively affects self-disclosure. Homophily also has the effect of heightening perceptions of identifiability, which decreases self-disclosure. Implications and applications are discussed.

References

[1]
D.R. Ames, Inside the mind reader's tool kit: Projection and stereotyping in mental state inference, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87 (2004) 340-353.
[2]
D.R. Ames, Strategies for social inference: A similarity contingency model of projection and stereotyping in attribute prevalence estimates, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87 (2004) 573-585.
[3]
R.P. Bagozzi, Y. Yi, L.W. Phillips, Assessing construct validity in organizational research, Administrative Science Quarterly, 36 (1991) 421-458.
[4]
J.N. Bailenson, N. Yee, D. Merget, R. Schroeder, The effect of behavioral realism and form realism of real-time avatar faces on verbal disclosure, nonverbal disclosure, emotion recognition, and copresence in dyadic interaction, Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 15 (2006) 359-372.
[5]
R. Bailey, K. Wise, P. Bolls, How avatar customizability affects children's arousal and subjective presence during junk food-sponsored online video games, CyberPsychology & Behavior, 12 (2009) 277-283.
[6]
J.A. Bargh, The four horsemen of automaticity: Awareness, intention, efficiency, and control in social cognition, in: Handbook of social cognition, Vol. 1, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, 1994, pp. 1-40.
[7]
N. Bauminger, R. Finzi-Dottan, S. Chason, D. Har-Even, Intimacy in adolescent friendship: The roles of attachment, coherence, and self-disclosure, Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 25 (2008) 409-428.
[8]
P.M. Bentler, C.-P. Chou, Practical issues in structural modeling, Sociological Methods & Research, 16 (1987) 78-117.
[9]
T. Boellstorff, Coming of age in Second Life: An anthropologist explores the virtually human, Princeton University Press, Princeton, 2008.
[10]
Testing structural equation models, in: Testing structural equation models, Sage Publications, Newbury Park, 1993.
[11]
S. Booth-Kewley, J.E. Edwards, P. Rosenfeld, Impression management, social desirability, and computer administration of attitude questionnaires: Does the computer make a difference?, Journal of Applied Psychology, 77 (1992) 562-566.
[12]
M.W. Browne, R. Cudeck, Alternative ways of assessing model fit, in: Testing structural equation models, Sage, Newsbury Park, CA, 1993, pp. 136-162.
[13]
A. Buss, Psychological dimensions of the self, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, Calif., 2001.
[14]
B.N. Byrne, Structural equation modeling with AMOS, Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, 2001.
[15]
D. Byrne, W. Griffitt, D. Stefaniak, Attraction and similarity of personality characteristics, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 5 (1967) 82-90.
[16]
P. Carbonell, A.I. Rodriguez, Designing teams for speedy product development: The moderating effect of technological complexity, Journal of Business Research, 59 (2006) 225-232.
[17]
E.G. Carmines, J.P. McIver, An introduction to the analysis of models with unobserved variables, Political Methodology, 9 (1983) 51-102.
[18]
M.K. Chang, P.M.S. Law, Factor structure for Young's Internet Addiction Test: A confirmatory study, Computers in Human Behavior, 24 (2008) 2597-2619.
[19]
L.A. Crosby, K.R. Evans, D. Cowles, Relationship quality in services selling: An interpersonal influence perspective, The Journal of Marketing (1990) 68-81.
[20]
M.H. Davis, S.L. Franzoi, Adolescent loneliness, self-disclosure, and private self-consciousness: A longitudinal investigation, Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 51 (1986) 595-608.
[21]
M.H. Davis, S.L. Franzoi, Private self-consciousness and self-disclosure, in: Self-disclosure: Theory, research, and therapy, Plenum Press, New York, 1987, pp. 59-79.
[22]
R.M. Dawes, Statistical criteria for establishing a truly false consensus effect, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 25 (1989) 1-17.
[23]
V. Derlega, A. Chaikin, Privacy and self-disclosure in social relationships, Journal of Social Issues, 33 (1977) 102-115.
[24]
E. Downs, S.S. Sundar, "We won" vs. "They lost": Exploring ego-enhancement and self-preservation tendencies in the context of video game play, Entertainment Computing, 2 (2011) 23-28.
[25]
V.J. Dubrovsky, S. Kiesler, B.N. Sethna, The equalization phenomenon: Status effects in computer-mediated and face-to-face decision-making groups, Human-Computer Interaction, 6 (1991) 119-146.
[26]
M.S. Eastin, Video game violence and the female game player: Self- and opponent gender effects on presence and aggressive thoughts, Human Communication Research, 32 (2006) 351-372.
[27]
H.D. Ellis, J.W. Shepherd, G.M. Davies, Identification of familiar and unfamiliar faces from internal and external features: Some implications for theories of face recognition, Perception, 8 (1979) 431-439.
[28]
A. Fenigstein, M.F. Scheier, A.H. Buss, Public and private self consciousness: Assessment and theory, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 43 (1975) 522-527.
[29]
C. Fornell, D.F. Larcker, Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error, Journal of Marketing Research, 18 (1981) 39-50.
[30]
J. Fox, J.N. Bailenson, Virtual self-modeling: The effects of vicarious reinforcement and identification on exercise behaviors, Media Psychology, 12 (2009) 1-25.
[31]
S.L. Franzoi, M.H. Davis, R.D. Young, The effects of private self-consciousness and perspective taking on satisfaction in close relationships, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48 (1985) 1584-1594.
[32]
W.J. Froming, G.R. Walker, K.J. Lopyan, Public and private self-awareness: When personal attitudes conflict with societal expectations, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 18 (1982) 476-487.
[33]
J.M. Govern, L.A. Marsch, Development and validation of the situational self-awareness scale, Consciousness and Cognition, 10 (2001) 366-378.
[34]
K. Greene, V.J. Derlega, A. Mathews, Self-disclosure in personal relationships, The Cambridge Handbook of Personal Relationships (2006) 409-427.
[35]
J. Hair, R. Anderson, R.L. Tatham, W. Black, Multivariate data analysis, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1998.
[36]
J.H. Harvey, J. Omarzu, Minding the close relationship, Personality and Social Psychology Review, 1 (1997) 224-240.
[37]
K.C. Herbst, L. Gaertner, C.A. Insko, My head says yes but my heart says no: Cognitive and affective attraction as a function of similarity to the ideal self, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84 (2003) 1206-1219.
[38]
M. Holzwarth, C. Janiszewski, M. Neumann, The influence of avatars on online consumer shopping behavior, Journal of Marketing, 70 (2006) 19-36.
[39]
Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications, in: Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, 1995.
[40]
T.L. Huston, G. Levinger, Interpersonal attraction and relationships, Annual Review of Psychology, 29 (1978) 115-156.
[41]
S.A.A. Jin, "I feel present. therefore, I experience flow:" A structural equation modeling approach to flow and presence in video games, Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 55 (2011) 114-136.
[42]
S.A.A. Jin, N. Park, Parasocial interaction with my avatar: Effects of interdependent self-construal and the mediating role of self-presence in an avatar-based console game, Wii, Cyberpsychology and Behavior, 12 (2009) 723-727.
[43]
A.N. Joinson, Self-disclosure in computer-mediated communication: The role of self-awareness and visual anonymity, European Journal of Social Psychology, 31 (2001) 177-192.
[44]
J. Krueger, On the perception of social consensus, in: Advances in experimental social psychology, Vol. 30, Academic Press, 1998, pp. 163-240.
[45]
T.J. Larsen, A.M. Sørebø, Ø. Sørebø, The role of task-technology fit as users' motivation to continue information system use, Computers in Human Behavior, 25 (2009) 778-784.
[46]
K. Lee, Presence, explicated, Communication Theory, 14 (2004) 27-50.
[47]
M.A. Lemley, Rights of attribution and integrity in online communication, in: Real law @ virtual space, Hampton, Cresskill, NJ, 1999, pp. 251-266.
[48]
Y.-M. Li, Y.-S. Yeh, Increasing trust in mobile commerce through design aesthetics, Computers in Human Behavior, 26 (2010) 673-684.
[49]
D.P. MacKinnon, C.M. Lockwood, J. Williams, Confidence limits for the indirect effect: Distribution of the product and resampling methods, Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39 (2004) 99-128.
[50]
L.L. McCroskey, J.C. McCroskey, V.P. Richmond, Analysis and improvement of the measurement of interpersonal attraction and homophily, Communication Quarterly, 54 (2006) 1-31.
[51]
K.Y.A. McKenna, J.A. Bargh, Causes and consequences of social interaction on the internet: A conceptual framework, Media Psychology, 1 (1999) 249-269.
[52]
K.Y.A. McKenna, A.S. Green, M.E.J. Gleason, Relationship formation on the internet: What's the big attraction?, Journal of Social Issues, 58 (2002) 9-31.
[53]
P.R. Messinger, X. Ge, E. Stroulia, K. Lyons, K. Smirnov, M. Bone, On the relationship between my avatar and myself, Journal of Virtual Worlds Research, 1 (2008) 1-17.
[54]
V. Midha, A. Nandedkar, Impact of similarity between avatar and their users on their perceived identifiability: Evidence from virtual teams in Second Life platform, Computers in Human Behavior, 28 (2012) 929-932.
[55]
M. Mikulincer, O. Nachshon, Attachment styles and patterns of self-disclosure, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61 (1991) 321-331.
[56]
M. Mikulincer, P.R. Shaver, The attachment behavioral system, in: Adulthood: Activation, psychodynamics, and interpersonal processes advances in experimental social psychology, Vol. 35, Academic Press, 2003, pp. 53-152.
[57]
L.C. Miller, J.H. Berg, R.L. Archer, Openers: Individuals who elicit intimate self-disclosure, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44 (1983) 1234-1244.
[58]
K.L. Nowak, C. Rauh, The influence of the avatar on online perceptions of anthropomorphism, androgyny, credibility, homophily, and attraction, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11 (2009).
[59]
J.B. Pryor, F.X. Gibbons, R.A. Wicklund, R.H. Fazio, R. Hood, Self-focused attention and self-report validity, Journal of Personality, 45 (1977) 513-527.
[60]
R. Ratan, B.S. Hasler, Exploring self-presence in collaborative virtual teams, PsychNology Journal, 8 (2010) 11-31.
[61]
E.M. Rogers, D.K. Bhowmik, Homophily-heterophily: Relational concepts for communication research, Public Opinion Quarterly, 34 (1970) 523-538.
[62]
M.F. Scheier, C.S. Carver, Private and public self-attention, resistance to change, and dissonance reduction, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39 (1980) 390-405.
[63]
C.R. Scott, Benefits and drawbacks of anonymous online communication: Legal challenges and communicative recommendations, in: Free speech yearbook, Vol. 41, National Communication Association, Washington, DC, 2004, pp. 127-141.
[64]
M. Selfhout, J. Denissen, S. Branje, W. Meeus, In the eye of the beholder: Perceived, actual, and peer-rated similarity in personality, communication, and friendship intensity during the acquaintanceship process, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96 (2009) 1152-1165.
[65]
P.E. Shrout, N. Bolger, Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: New procedures and recommendations, Psychological Methods, 7 (2002) 422-445.
[66]
L. Sproull, S. Kiesler, Reducing social context cues: Electronic mail in organizational communication, Management Science, 32 (1986) 1492-1512.
[67]
J.P. Strauss, M.R. Barrick, M.L. Connerley, An investigation of personality similarity effects (relational and perceived) on peer and supervisor ratings and the role of familiarity and liking, Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 74 (2001) 637-657.
[68]
S. Trepte, L. Reinecke, Avatar creation and video game enjoyment, Journal of Media Psychology, 22 (2010) 171-184.
[69]
D.B. Turban, A.P. Jones, Supervisor-subordinate similarity: Types, effects, and mechanisms, Journal of Applied Psychology, 73 (1988) 228-234.
[70]
L. Van Boven, G. Loewenstein, Social projection of transient drive states, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29 (2003) 1159-1168.
[71]
Vasalou, A., Joinson, A. N., & Pitt, J. (2007, April 28-May 3). Constructing my online self: Avatars that increase self-focused attention. In Paper presented at the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, San Jose, California.
[72]
A. Vasalou, A.N. Joinson, Me, myself and I: The role of interactional context on self-presentation through avatars, Computers in Human Behavior, 25 (2009) 510-520.
[73]
Whelan, T. J., & Thompson, L. F. (2009). Development/validation of the PANON scale assessing survey anonymity perceptions. In Paper presented at the paper presented at the 24th annual conference of the society for Industrial and organizational psychology.
[74]
K.D. Williams, The effects of homophily, identification, and violent video games on players, Mass Communication and Society, 14 (2011) 3-24.
[75]
D. Williams, T.L.M. Kennedy, R.J. Moore, Behind the avatar: The patterns, practices, and functions of role playing in MMOs, Games and Culture, 6 (2011) 171-200.
[76]
N. Yee, J. Bailenson, The Proteus effect: The effect of transformed self-representation on behavior, Human Communication Research, 33 (2007) 271-290.
[77]
N. Yee, J.N. Bailenson, N. Ducheneaut, The Proteus effect: Implications of transformed digital self-representation on online and offline behavior, Communication Research, 36 (2009) 285-312.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Collaborating with my DoppelgängerProceedings of the ACM on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques10.1145/36512887:1(1-23)Online publication date: 13-May-2024
  • (2024)Your Avatar Seems Hesitant to Share About Yourself: How People Perceive Others' Avatars in the Transparent SystemProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642568(1-14)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
  • (2024)Being excluded in the metaverseInternational Journal of Information Management: The Journal for Information Professionals10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2024.10280878:COnline publication date: 1-Oct-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Computers in Human Behavior
Computers in Human Behavior  Volume 39, Issue C
October, 2014
422 pages

Publisher

Elsevier Science Publishers B. V.

Netherlands

Publication History

Published: 01 September 2014

Author Tags

  1. Avatar
  2. Self-awareness
  3. Self-disclosure
  4. Virtual environment

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 16 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Collaborating with my DoppelgängerProceedings of the ACM on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques10.1145/36512887:1(1-23)Online publication date: 13-May-2024
  • (2024)Your Avatar Seems Hesitant to Share About Yourself: How People Perceive Others' Avatars in the Transparent SystemProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642568(1-14)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
  • (2024)Being excluded in the metaverseInternational Journal of Information Management: The Journal for Information Professionals10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2024.10280878:COnline publication date: 1-Oct-2024
  • (2024)Me, myself, and IComputers in Human Behavior10.1016/j.chb.2023.107950149:COnline publication date: 10-Jan-2024
  • (2023)Between Reality and Fiction: Self-Representation as an Avatar and Its Effects on Self-PresenceProceedings of the 2023 International Joint Conference on Robotics and Artificial Intelligence10.1145/3632971.3633048(193-203)Online publication date: 7-Jul-2023
  • (2023)Visual Similarity for Socially Interactive Agents that Support Self-AwarenessProceedings of the 23rd ACM International Conference on Intelligent Virtual Agents10.1145/3570945.3607329(1-3)Online publication date: 19-Sep-2023
  • (2023)AVOCUS: A Voice Customization System for Online PersonasExtended Abstracts of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3544549.3585892(1-6)Online publication date: 19-Apr-2023
  • (2023)“To be or Not to be Me?”: Exploration of Self-Similar Effects of Avatars on Social Virtual Reality ExperiencesIEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics10.1109/TVCG.2023.332024029:11(4794-4804)Online publication date: 1-Nov-2023
  • (2022)Something Personal from the Metaverse: Goals, Topics, and Contextual Factors of Self-Disclosure in Commercial Social VRProceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3491102.3502008(1-17)Online publication date: 29-Apr-2022
  • (2022)“A Voice that Suits the Situation”: Understanding the Needs and Challenges for Supporting End-User Voice CustomizationProceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3491102.3501856(1-10)Online publication date: 29-Apr-2022
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

View options

Login options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media