Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
research-article

Everyday deception or a few prolific liars? The prevalence of lies in text messaging

Published: 01 December 2014 Publication History

Abstract

Most people tell lies over text messaging, and a minority of those people do so frequently.The goals of text messaging impact the properties of deceptive text messages relative to face-to-face lies.There is some indication that deception occurs less frequently in closer relationships. With the recent and dramatic changes to communication patterns introduced by new information technologies it is increasingly important to understand how deception is produced in new media. In the present study we investigate deception production in text messaging, focusing on how often people lie, about what and to whom. This study uses a novel data collection method that allows for the examination of individuals' communication records at the message level, which may provide a more accurate account of deception behavior than diary or survey methods. We find that the majority of our participants practiced deception in text messaging. Although lying was a relatively infrequent occurrence for the majority of our participants, there were a small number of prolific liars who told a disproportionately large number of lies using this medium. Additionally, we found some support for the argument that deception occurs less frequently in closer relationships, and we observed how the micro-coordination goals of text messaging change the properties of deceptive text messages relative to face-to-face lies.

References

[1]
A. Battestini, V. Setlur, T. Sohn, A large scale study of text messaging use, Proceedings of MobileHCI (2010) 229-238.
[2]
J. Birnholtz, J. Guillory, J. Hancock, N. Bazarova, On my way: Deceptive texting and interpersonal awareness narratives, Proceedings of CSCW (2010) 1-4.
[3]
S. Bok, Lying: Moral choice in public and private life, Vintage Books, New York, 1999.
[4]
C.F. Bond, B.M. DePaulo, Accuracy of deception judgments, Personality and social psychology Review, 10 (2006) 214-234.
[5]
D.V. Cicchetti, S.A. Sparrow, Developing criteria for establishing interrater reliability of specific items: Applications to assessment of adaptive behavior, American Journal of Mental Deficiency (1981).
[6]
CTIA (2012). U.S. Wireless Quick Facts. <http://www.ctia.org/consumer_info/service/index.cfm/AID/10323>.
[7]
B.M. DePaulo, D.A. Kashy, Everyday lies in close and casual relationships, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74 (1998) 63-79.
[8]
B.M. DePaulo, D.A. Kashy, S.E. Kirkendol, M.M. Wyer, J.A. Epstein, Lying in everyday life, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70 (1996) 979-995.
[9]
B.M. DePaulo, J.J. Lindsay, B.E. Malone, L. Muhlenbruck, K. Charlton, H. Cooper, Cues to deception, Psychological Bulletin, 129 (2003) 74-118.
[10]
J.F. George, A. Robb, Deception and computer-mediated communication in daily life, Communication Reports, 21 (2008) 92-103.
[11]
Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. Garden City, NY.
[12]
R. Halevy, S. Shalvi, B. Verschuere, Being honest about dishonesty: Correlating self-reports and actual lying, Human Communication Research, 40 (2014) 54-72.
[13]
J. Hancock, J. Birnholtz, N. Bazarova, J. Guillory, J. Perlin, B. Amos, Butler lies: Awareness, deception and design, Proceedings of CHI (2009) 517-526.
[14]
J. Hancock, J. Thom-Santelli, T. Ritchie, Deception and design: The impact of communication technology on lying behavior, Proceedings of CHI (2004) 129-134.
[15]
R. Ling, B. Yttri, 10 Hyper-coordination via mobile phones in Norway, Perpetual Contact: Mobile Communication, Private Talk, Public Performance, 139 (2002).
[16]
S. Metts, An exploratory investigation of deception in close relationships, Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 6 (1989) 159-179.
[17]
G.R. Miller, P.A. Mongeau, C. Sleight, Fudging with friends and lying to lovers: Deceptive communication in personal relationships, Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 3 (1986) 495-512.
[18]
G.R. Miller, J. Stiff, Deceptive communication, Sage, Newbury Park, CA, 1993.
[19]
Pew Research Center (2012). Teens, smartphones, and texting. <http://pewinternet.org/~/media/Files/Reports/2012/PIP_Teens_Smartphones_and_Texting.pdf>.
[20]
Purcell, K., Entner, R., & Henderson, N (2010). The rise of apps culture. <http://pewinternet.org/~/media//Files/Reports/2010/PIP_Nielsen%20Apps%20Report.pdf>.
[21]
L. Reynolds, S. Gillette, J. Marder, Z. Miles, P. Vodenski, A. Weintraub, Contact stratification and deception: Blackberry messenger versus SMS use among students, Proceedings of CSCW (2011) 221-224.
[22]
Reynolds, L., Smith, M. E., Birnholtz, J. P., & Hancock, J. T. (2013). Butler lies from both sides: actions and perceptions of unavailability management in texting. In: Proceedings of CSCW (pp. 769-778).
[23]
K.B. Serota, T.R. Levine, F.J. Boster, The prevalence of lying in America: Three studies of self-reported lies, Human Communication Research, 36 (2010) 2-25.
[24]
SPSS Technical Report-Linear Effects Mixed Modeling. <http://www.spss.ch/upload/1107355943_LinearMixedEffectsModelling.pdf>.
[25]
L. Stafford, J.A. Daly, Conversational memory, Human Communication Research, 10 (1984) 379-402.
[26]
M.T. Whitty, T. Buchanan, A.N. Joinson, A. Meredith, Not all lies are spontaneous: An examination of deception across different modes of communication, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63 (2012) 208-216.

Cited By

View all
  • (2018)Understanding Motivations behind Inaccurate Check-insProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/32744572:CSCW(1-22)Online publication date: 1-Nov-2018
  • (2016)Why do people lie online? Because everyone lies on the internetComputers in Human Behavior10.1016/j.chb.2016.06.05264:C(134-142)Online publication date: 1-Nov-2016
  • (2015)Spatial subterfugeProceedings of the 2015 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing10.1145/2750858.2804281(1131-1135)Online publication date: 7-Sep-2015

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Computers in Human Behavior
Computers in Human Behavior  Volume 41, Issue C
December 2014
554 pages

Publisher

Elsevier Science Publishers B. V.

Netherlands

Publication History

Published: 01 December 2014

Author Tags

  1. Computer-mediated communication
  2. Deception
  3. Lying
  4. Text messaging

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 24 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2018)Understanding Motivations behind Inaccurate Check-insProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/32744572:CSCW(1-22)Online publication date: 1-Nov-2018
  • (2016)Why do people lie online? Because everyone lies on the internetComputers in Human Behavior10.1016/j.chb.2016.06.05264:C(134-142)Online publication date: 1-Nov-2016
  • (2015)Spatial subterfugeProceedings of the 2015 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing10.1145/2750858.2804281(1131-1135)Online publication date: 7-Sep-2015

View Options

View options

Login options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media