Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
article

Multitasking across generations: Multitasking choices and difficulty ratings in three generations of Americans

Published: 01 March 2009 Publication History

Abstract

This study investigated whether changes in the technological/social environment in the United States over time have resulted in concomitant changes in the multitasking skills of younger generations. One thousand, three hundred and nineteen Americans from three generations were queried to determine their at-home multitasking behaviors. An anonymous online questionnaire asked respondents to indicate which everyday and technology-based tasks they choose to combine for multitasking and to indicate how difficult it is to multitask when combining the tasks. Combining tasks occurred frequently, especially while listening to music or eating. Members of the ''Net Generation'' reported more multitasking than members of ''Generation X,'' who reported more multitasking than members of the ''Baby Boomer'' generation. The choices of which tasks to combine for multitasking were highly correlated across generations, as were difficulty ratings of specific multitasking combinations. The results are consistent with a greater amount of general multitasking resources in younger generations, but similar mental limitations in the types of tasks that can be multitasked.

References

[1]
Development of the adolescent brain: Implications for executive function and social cognition. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry. v47 i3/4. 296-312.
[2]
Working memory performance in typically developing children and adolescents: Behavioral evidence of protracted frontal lobe development. Developmental Neuropsychology. v31 i1. 103-128.
[3]
Generation X: Tales for an accelerated culture. St. Martin's Press, New York, NY.
[4]
Isolation of a central bottleneck of information processing with time-resolved fMRI. Neuron. v52. 1109-1120.
[5]
Foehr, U. G. (2006). Media multitasking among American youth: Prevalence, predictors and pairings. Menlo Park, CA: The Henry J. Kaiser family foundation. Available from http://www.kff.org/entmedia/upload/7592.pdf.
[6]
Modulation of competing memory systems by distraction. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. v103 i31. 11778-11783.
[7]
In-class laptop use and its effects on student learning. Computers & Education. v50. 906-914.
[8]
Predictors of multitasking with media: Media factors and audience factors. Media Psychology. v10. 364-384.
[9]
Great expectations: America and the Baby Boom generation. Coward, McCann and Geoghegan, New York, NY.
[10]
Jordan, A., Fishbein, M., Zhang, W., Jeong, S. H., Hennessy, M., Martin, S, et al., (2005). Multiple media use and multitasking with media among high school and college students. Paper presented at international communication association, Annual meeting, New York, NY.
[11]
Electronic media use, reading, and academic distractibility in college youth. CyberPsychology & Behavior. v10 i4. 560-566.
[12]
The development of nonverbal working memory and executive control processes in adolescents. Child Development. v76 i3. 697-712.
[13]
Mixing costs and switch costs when switching stimulus dimensions in serial predictions. Psychological Research. v72. 405-414.
[14]
Cognition: Theory and applications. 6th ed. Wadsworth/Thomson Learning, Belmont, CA.
[15]
Roberts, D. F., Foehr, U. G., & Rideout, V. (2005). Generation M: Media in the lives of 8-18-year-olds. The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation. Available from http://www.kff.org/entmedia/entmedia030905pkg.cfm.
[16]
Me, MySpace, and I: Parenting the net generation. Palgrave Macmillan, New York, NY.
[17]
Growing up digital: The rise of the net generation. McGraw-Hill, New York, NY.
[18]
U.S. Census Bureau (2006). American community survey. Available from http://factfinder.census.gov/servlet/ACSSAFFFacts?_event=Search&_langx=585en&_sse=on&geo_id=05000US06037&_county=Los+Angeles+County.

Cited By

View all

Index Terms

  1. Multitasking across generations: Multitasking choices and difficulty ratings in three generations of Americans

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

        Information & Contributors

        Information

        Published In

        cover image Computers in Human Behavior
        Computers in Human Behavior  Volume 25, Issue 2
        March, 2009
        344 pages

        Publisher

        Elsevier Science Publishers B. V.

        Netherlands

        Publication History

        Published: 01 March 2009

        Author Tags

        1. Childhood development
        2. Cognitive ability
        3. Cognitive processes
        4. Perceptual motor processes
        5. Society
        6. Sociocultural factors

        Qualifiers

        • Article

        Contributors

        Other Metrics

        Bibliometrics & Citations

        Bibliometrics

        Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
        Reflects downloads up to 07 Mar 2025

        Other Metrics

        Citations

        Cited By

        View all
        • (2025)How to Hire a Gen Z Through GamingComputer10.1109/MC.2024.348525258:1(109-116)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2025
        • (2024)Cognitive Performance in the Digital EraInternational Journal of Cyber Behavior, Psychology and Learning10.4018/IJCBPL.34178814:1(1-14)Online publication date: 9-Apr-2024
        • (2024)SCAINs Presenter: Preventing Miscommunication by Detecting Context-Dependent Utterances in Spoken DialogueProceedings of the 29th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces10.1145/3640543.3645147(549-565)Online publication date: 18-Mar-2024
        • (2021)Fear of missing out (FoMO) among undergraduate students in relation to attention distraction and learning disengagement in lecturesEducation and Information Technologies10.1007/s10639-020-10361-726:2(2355-2373)Online publication date: 1-Mar-2021
        • (2020)Patterns of multitasking behaviours of adolescents in digital environmentsEducation and Information Technologies10.1007/s10639-019-09982-425:1(623-645)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2020
        • (2019)Conservation of ProcrastinationProceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3290605.3300560(1-12)Online publication date: 2-May-2019
        • (2018)Effect of Multitasking on Simulator Sickness and Performance in 3D Aerodrome Control TrainingSimulation and Gaming10.1177/104687811775041749:1(27-49)Online publication date: 1-Feb-2018
        • (2018)When frequent media multitaskers perform worse and when they do notComputers in Human Behavior10.1016/j.chb.2018.01.04383:C(184-193)Online publication date: 1-Jun-2018
        • (2018)Distortions in time perceptions during task switchingComputers in Human Behavior10.1016/j.chb.2017.11.03280:C(362-369)Online publication date: 1-Mar-2018
        • (2018)Screen overloadComputers in Human Behavior10.1016/j.chb.2017.10.04280:C(1-11)Online publication date: 1-Mar-2018
        • Show More Cited By

        View Options

        View options

        Figures

        Tables

        Media

        Share

        Share

        Share this Publication link

        Share on social media