Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
article

Automatic differential diagnosis of pancreatic serous and mucinous cystadenomas based on morphological features

Published: 01 January 2013 Publication History

Abstract

Generally, pathological diagnosis using an electron microscope is time-consuming and likely to result in a subjective judgment, because pathologists perform manual screening of tissue slides at high magnifications. Recently, the advent of digital pathology technology has provided the basis for convenient screening and quantitative analysis by digitizing tissue slides through a computer system. However, a screening process with high magnification still takes quite a long time. To solve these problems, recently the use of computer-aided design techniques for performing pathologic diagnosis has been increasing in digital pathology. For pathological diagnosis, we need different diagnostic methods for different regions with different characteristics. Therefore, in order to effectively diagnose different lesions and types of diseases, a quantitative method for extracting specific features is required in computerized pathologic diagnosis. This study is about an automated differential diagnosis system to differentiate between benign serous cystadenoma and possibly-malignant mucinous cystadenoma. In order to diagnose cystic tumors, the first step is identifying a cystic region and inspecting its epithelial cells. First, we identify the lumen boundary of a cyst using the Direction Cumulative Map considering 8-ways. Then, the Epithelial Nuclei Identification algorithm is used to discern epithelial nuclei. After that, three morphological features for the differential diagnosis of mucinous and serous cystadenomas are extracted. To demonstrate the superiority of the proposed features, the experiments compared performance of the classifiers learned by using the proposed morphological features and the classical morphological features based on nuclei. The classifiers in the simulations are as follows; Bayesian Classifier, k-Nearest Neighbors, Support Vector Machine, and Artificial Neural Network. The results show that all classifiers using the proposed features have the best classification performance.

References

[1]
Potts, S.J., Digital pathology in drug discovery and development: multisite integration. Drug Discov. Today. v14 i19-20. 935-941.
[2]
Gurcan, M.N., Boucheron, L.E., Can, A., Madabhushi, A., Rajpoot, N.M. and Yener, B., Histopathological image analysis: a review. IEEE Rev. Biomed. Eng. v2. 147-171.
[3]
Malignant mesothelioma of the pleura: interobserver variability. J. Clin. Pathol. v48 i9. 856-860.
[4]
Ismail, S.M., Colclough, A.B., Dinnen, J.S., Eakins, D., Evans, D.M., Gradwell, E., O'Sullivan, J.P., Summerell, J.M. and Newcombe, R.G., Observer variation in histopathological diagnosis and grading of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. BMJ J. v298 i6675. 707-710.
[5]
Ortiz De Solórzano, C., Costes, S., Callahan, D.E., Parvin, B. and Barcellos-Hoff, M.H., Applications of quantitative digital image analysis to breast cancer research. Microsc. Res. Tech. v59 i2. 119-127.
[6]
W.N. Street, W.H. Wolberg, O.L. Mangasarian, Nuclear feature extraction for breast tumor diagnosis, Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, vol. 1905, 1993, pp. 861-870.
[7]
Wolberg, W.H., Street, W.N., Heisey, D.M. and Mangasarian, O.L., Computer-derived nuclear features distinguish malignant from benign breast cytology. Hum. Pathol. v26 i7. 792-796.
[8]
Computerized scene segmentation for the discrimination of architectural features in ductal proliferative lesions of the breast. J. Pathol. v181 i4. 374-380.
[9]
C. Bilgin, C. Demir, C. Nagi, B. Yener, Cell-graph mining for breast tissue modeling and classification, in: Proceedings of the 29th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 2007, pp. 5311-5314.
[10]
S. Naik, S. Doyle, M. Feldman, J. Tomaszewski, A. Madabhushi, Gland segmentation and computerized gleason grading of prostate histology by integrating low-, high-level and domain specific information, MIAAB Workshop, 2007.
[11]
S. Naik, S. Doyle, S. Agner, A. Madabhushi, M. Feldman, J. Tomaszewski, Automated gland and nuclei segmentation for grading of prostate and breast cancer histopathology, in: Proceedings of the 5th IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro, 2008, pp. 284-287.
[12]
Computerized image-based detection and grading of lymphocytic infiltration in HER2+ breast cancer histopathology. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. v57 i3. 642-653.
[13]
Gleason, D.F. and Mellinger, G.T., Prediction of prognosis for prostatic adenocarcinoma by combined histological grading and clinical staging. J. Urol. v111 i1. 58-64.
[14]
Wetzel, A.W., Crowley, R., Kim, S., Dawson, R., Zheng, L., Joo, Y.M., Yagi, Y., Gilbertson, J., Gadd, C., Deerfield, D.W. and Becich, M.J., Evaluation of prostate tumor grades by content-based image retrieval. in Proceedings of the SPIE, 27th AIPR Workshop: Advances in Computer-Assisted Recognition. v3584. 244-252.
[15]
M. Makinacı, Support vector machine approach for classification of cancerous prostate regions, World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, 2005.
[16]
S. Doyle, M. Hwang, K. Shah, A. Madabhushi, M. Feldman, J. Tomaszeweski, Automated grading of prostate cancer using architectural and textural image features, in Proceedings of the 4th IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro, 2007, pp. 1284-1287.
[17]
Tabesh, A., Teverovskiy, M., Pang, H.-Y., Kumar, V.P., Verbel, D., Kotsianti, A. and Saidi, O., Multifeature prostate cancer diagnosis and gleason grading of histological images. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging. v26 i10. 1366-1378.
[18]
Sarkar, N. and Chaudhuri, B.B., An efficient differential box-counting approach to compute fractal dimension of image. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. v24 i1. 115-120.
[19]
Huang, P.-W. and Lee, C.-H., Automatic classification for pathological prostate images based on fractal analysis. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging. v28 i7. 1037-1050.
[20]
Choi, H.K., Jarkrans, T., Bengtsson, E., Vasko, J., Wester, K., Malmström, P.U. and Busch, C., Image analysis based grading of bladder carcinoma. Comparison of object, texture and graph based methods and their reproducibility. Anal. Cell. Pathol. v15 i1. 1-18.
[21]
Computer-based grading of haematoxylin-eosin stained tissue sections of urinary bladder carcinomas. Med. Inform. Internet Med. v26 i3. 179-190.
[22]
Nasser Esgiar, A., Naguib, R.N.G., Sharif, B.S., Bennett, M.K. and Murray, A., Microscopic image analysis for quantitative measurement and feature identification of normal and cancerous colonic mucosa. IEEE Trans. Inf. Technol. Biomed. v2 i3. 197-203.
[23]
Esgiar, A.N., Naguib, R.N.G., Sharif, B.S., Bennett, M.K. and Murray, A., Fractal analysis in the detection of colonic cancer images. IEEE Trans. Inf. Technol. Biomed. v6 i1. 54-58.
[24]
K. Belkacem-Boussaid, M. Pennell, G. Lozanski, A. Shana'ah, M.N. Gurcan, Effect of pathologist agreement on evaluating a computer-aided assisted system: recognizing centroblast cells in follicular lymphoma cases, in Proceedings of the 2010 IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro, 2010, pp. 1411-1414.
[25]
Sertel, O., Lozanski, G., Shana'ah, A. and Gurcan, M.N., Computer-aided detection of centroblasts for follicular lymphoma grading using adaptive likelihood-based cell segmentation. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. v57 i10. 2613-2616.
[26]
Zhou, Z.-H., Jiang, Y., Yang, Y.-B. and Chen, S.-F., Lung cancer cell identification based on artificial neural network ensembles. Artif. Intell. Med. v24 i1. 25-36.
[27]
Li, T., Wang, S. and Zhao, N., Gray-scale edge detection for gastric tumor pathologic cell images by morphological analysis. Comput. Biol. Med. v39 i11. 947-952.
[28]
Kong, J., Sertel, O., Shimada, H., Boyer, K.L., Saltz, J.H. and Gurcan, M.N., Computer-aided evaluation of neuroblastoma on whole-slide histology images: classifying grade of neuroblastic differentiation. Patt. Recog. v42 i6. 1080-1092.
[29]
Doyle, S., Feldman, M., Tomaszewski, J. and Madabhushi, A., A boosted bayesian multiresolution classifier for prostate cancer detection from digitized needle biopsies. IEEE Trans. Biomed Eng. v59 i5. 1205-1218.
[30]
Warshaw, A.L. and Rutledge, P.L., Cystic tumors mistaken for pancreatic pseudocysts. Ann. Surg. v205 i4. 393-398.
[31]
Woo, S.M., Min, B.H., Choi, K.D., Kang, J.M., Kim, S.J., Hwang, J.H., Jeong, J.B., Kim, Y.T., Yoon, Y.B., Park, I.A. and Han, J.K., Cystic fluid analysis for the differential diagnosis of pancreatic cyst. Korean J. Gastroenterol. v40 i6. 394-401.
[32]
Pyke, C.M., van Heerden, J.A., Colby, T.V., Sarr, M.G. and Weaver, A.L., The spectrum of serous cystadenoma of the pancreas. Clinical, pathologic, and surgical aspects. Ann. Surg. v215 i2. 132-139.
[33]
Warshaw, A.L., Compton, C.C., Lewandrowski, K., Cardenosa, G. and Mueller, P.R., Cystic tumors of the pancreas. New clinical, radiologic, and pathologic observations in 67 patients. Ann. Surg. v212 i4. 432-445.
[34]
Taft, D.A. and Freeny, P.C., Cystic neoplasms of the pancreas. Am. J. Surg. v142 i1. 30-35.
[35]
Hodgkinson, D.J., ReMine, W.H. and Weiland, L.H., A clinicopathologic study of 21 cases of pancreatic cystadenocarcinoma. Ann. Surg. v188 i5. 679-684.
[36]
F.T. Bosman, F. Carneiro, R.H. Hruban, N.D. Theise, F.T. Bosman, F. Carneiro, R.H. Hruban, N.D. Theise, WHO classification of tumours of the digestive system, 4, 2010.
[37]
Bae, B.J., Kim, Y.H., Kang, K.J. and Lim, T.J., Comparison of mucinous cystic tumor and intraductal papillary mucinous tumor. Korean J. Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surg. v6 i1. 94-99.
[38]
Fine needle aspiration cytology of mucinous cystic carcinoma of the pancreas: a case report. Korean J. Cytopathol. v16 i2. 88-92.
[39]
Rodenacker, K. and Bengtsson, E., A feature set for cytometry on digitized microscopic images. Anal. Cell. Pathol. v25 i1. 1-36.
[40]
A survey of thresholding techniques. Comput. Vision Graph. Image Process. v41 i2. 233-260.
[41]
González, R.C. and Woods, R.E., Digital Image Processing. 2008. 3rd ed. Prentice Hall.
[42]
J.W. Song, J.H. Lee, T.S. Park, S.J. Chun, J.H. Choi, Mucinous cystadenoma classification system using automated epithelial tissue detection, in: Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Vision, 2010, pp. 286-290.
[43]
Otsu, N., A threshold selection method from gray-level histograms. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. v9 i1. 62-66.
[44]
C. Pan, C.-X. Zheng, H.-J. Wang, Robust color image segmentation based on mean shift and marker-controlled watershed algorithm, in: Proceedings of the 2003 International Conference on Machine Learning and Cybernetics, vol. 5, 2003, pp. 2752-2756.
[45]
Shekhar, S. and Chawla, S., Spatial Databases: A Tour. 2003. 1st ed. Prentice Hall.
[46]
ScanScope CS, Aperio, 2012. Available from: {http://www.aperio.com/healthcare/capture/cs}.
[47]
W. Rasband, ImageJ, 2012. Available from: {http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/}.
[48]
Demir, C. and Yener, B., Automated Cancer Diagnosis Based on Histopathological Systematic Images: A Systematic Survey, Technical Report TR-05-09. 2005. Computer Science Department at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy NY, US.
[49]
Allen, T., Particle Size Measurement: Powder Sampling and Particle Size Measurement. 1996. 4th ed. Chapman & Hall, London.
[50]
The Elements of Statistical Learning: Data Mining, Inference, and Prediction. 2001. Springer.
[51]
Hsu, C.W., Chang, C.C. and Lin, C.J., A Practical Guide to Support Vector Classification, Technical Report. 2003. Department of Computer Science, National Taiwan University.
[52]
Geange, S.W., Pledger, S., Burns, K.C. and Shima, J.S., A unified analysis of niche overlap incorporating data of different types. Methods in Ecology and Evolution. v2 i2. 175-184.
  1. Automatic differential diagnosis of pancreatic serous and mucinous cystadenomas based on morphological features

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

        Information & Contributors

        Information

        Published In

        cover image Computers in Biology and Medicine
        Computers in Biology and Medicine  Volume 43, Issue 1
        January, 2013
        73 pages

        Publisher

        Pergamon Press, Inc.

        United States

        Publication History

        Published: 01 January 2013

        Author Tags

        1. CAD
        2. Cystic cell density
        3. Cystic cytoplasm length
        4. Differential diagnosis
        5. Epithelial cell
        6. Lumen
        7. Mucin producing
        8. Mucinous cystadenoma
        9. Pancreas
        10. Serous cystadenoma

        Qualifiers

        • Article

        Contributors

        Other Metrics

        Bibliometrics & Citations

        Bibliometrics

        Article Metrics

        • 0
          Total Citations
        • 0
          Total Downloads
        • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
        Reflects downloads up to 29 Jan 2025

        Other Metrics

        Citations

        View Options

        View options

        Figures

        Tables

        Media

        Share

        Share

        Share this Publication link

        Share on social media