research-article

The troubles of high-profile open access megajournals

Author:

Petr HenebergAuthors Info & Claims

Scientometrics, Volume 120, Issue 2

Pages 733 - 746

https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03144-6

Published: 01 August 2019 Publication History

Abstract

The rise in open access journals was followed by the proliferation of open access megajournals, which were once expected to become a major publication platform of the future. We analyzed the bibliometric parameters of 11 megajournals sensu stricto according to the definition by Björk and compared them with three control groups of gold open-access journals that do not satisfy the criteria for megajournals and that do not apply the concept of “sound science”, namely the journals published under the PLoS, BMC and Hindawi brands. We show that nonselective megajournals have started to decline in all bibliometric parameters. These journals in particular have lost connection with the most advanced science as revealed by the decreasing citations to and from the top-tier journals. While some megajournals have underperformed on bibliometric parameters from the beginning of their existence, others experienced a short honeymoon period before declining. In contrast, major discipline-specific open-access journals remain competitive, and those published by less prominent publishers have even increased their performance. However, the discipline-specific open-access journals also display decreasing citations to and from the top-tier journals. Concluded, we provided the first evidence that the change in the perception of megajournals is associated with the deterioration of their bibliometric characteristics. The future of megajournals as a major publishing platform is now threatened.

References

[1]

Anderson, K. (2016). The new(ish) kids on the block—Touring the megajournals. The Scholarly Kitchen. https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2016/04/05/the-newish-kids-on-the-block-touring-the-megajournals/. Cited as March 5, 2019.

[2]

Anonymus Don`t pay prizes for published science Nature 2017 547 137

[3]

Binfield, P. (2011). PLoS ONE and the rise of the open access mega journal. Presentation at Society of Scholarly Publishing (SSP) meeting, June 1, 2011. https://www.slideshare.net/PBinfield/ssp-presentation4. Cited as November 27, 2018.

[4]

Björk B-C Have the “mega-journals” reached the limits to growth? PeerJ 2015 3 e981

[5]

Björk BC and Catani P Peer review in megajournals compared with traditional scholarly journals: Does it make a difference? Learned Publishing 2016 29 9-12

[6]

Borrego, Á. (2018). Are mega-journals a publication outlet for lower quality research? A bibliometric analysis of Spanish authors in PLOS ONE. Online Information Review. 10.1108/oir-04-2018-0136.

[7]

Burns CS Characteristics of a megajournal: A bibliometric case study Journal of Information Science Theory and Practice 2015 3 16-30

[8]

Cagan R The San Francisco declaration on research assessment Disease Models & Mechanisms 2013 6 869-870

[9]

Cronin B The resilience of rejected manuscripts Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2012 63 1903-1904

[10]

Davis, P. (2014). PLOS ONE output falls following impact factor decline. The Scholarly Kitchen. https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2014/03/07/plos-one-output-falls-following-impact-factor-decline/. Cited as November 27, 2018.

[11]

Davis, P. (2018a). Future of the OA megajournal. The Scholarly Kitchen. https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2018/01/10/future-oa-megajournal/. Cited as November 27, 2018.

[12]

Davis, P. (2018b). Journal growth lowers impact factor. The Scholarly Kitchen. https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2018/06/13/journal-growth-lowers-impact-factor/. Cited as March 6, 2019.

[13]

Fein C Multidimensional journal evaluation of PLOS ONE Libri 2013 63 259-271

[14]

Frandsen TF Are predatory journals undermining the credibility of science? A bibliometric analysis of citers Scientometrics 2017 113 1513-1528

[15]

Heber, J. (2018). Towards our next ten years. News & Policy. https://blogs.plos.org/everyone/2018/02/26/towards-our-next-10-years/. Cited as March 5, 2019.

[16]

Heneberg P From excessive journal self-cites to citation stacking: Analysis of journal self-citation kinetics in search for journals, which boost their scientometric indicators PLoS ONE 2016 11 e0153730

[17]

Hicks D, Wouters P, Waltman L, de Rijcke S, and Rafols I Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics Nature 2015 520 429-431

[18]

Peters P Going all the way: How Hindawi became an open access publisher Learned Publishing 2007 20 191-195

[19]

Pisoschi AM and Pisoschi CG Is open access the solution to increase the impact of scientific journals? Scientometrics 2016 109 1075-1095

[20]

Shah, D. (2016). MOOC trends in 2016: MOOCs no longer massive. MOOC Report. https://www.class-central.com/report/moocs-no-longer-massive/. Cited as March 5, 2019.

[21]

Shen CY and Björk BC “Predatory” open access: A longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics BMC Medicine 2015 13 15

[22]

Solomon DJ A survey of authors publishing in four megajournals PeerJ 2014 2 e365

[23]

Spezi V, Wakeling S, Pinfield S, Creaser C, Fry J, and Willett P Open-access mega-journals. The future of scholarly communication or academic dumping ground? A review Journal of Documentation 2017 73 263-283

[24]

Sugimoto CR, Larivière V, Ni C, and Cronin B Journal acceptance rates: A cross-disciplinary analysis of variability and relationships with journal measures Journal of Informetrics 2013 7 897-906

[25]

Verma IM Impact, not impact factor Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 2015 112 7875-7876

[26]

Wakeling Simon, Creaser Claire, Pinfield Stephen, Fry Jenny, Spezi Valérie, Willett Peter, and Paramita Monica Motivations, understandings, and experiences of open-access mega-journal authors: Results of a large-scale survey Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 2019 70 7 754-768

[27]

Wakeling S, Spezi V, Creaser C, Fry J, Pinfield S, and Willett P Open access megajournals: The publisher perspective (part 2: operational realities) Learned Publishing 2017 30 313-322

[28]

Wakeling S, Spezi V, Fry J, Creaser C, Pinfield S, and Willett P Academic communities: The role of journals and open-access mega-journals in scholarly communication Journal of Documentation 2019 75 120-139

[29]

Wakeling S, Willett P, Creaser C, Fry J, Pinfield S, and Spezi V Open-access megajournals: A bibliometric profile PLoS ONE 2016 11 e0165359

[30]

Ware, M., & Mabe, M. (2015). The STM report. International Association of Scientific, Technical and Medical Publishers, Hague. http://www.markwareconsulting.com/the-stm-report/. Cited as November 27, 2018.

[31]

Xia J, Harmon JL, Connolly KG, Donnelly RM, Anderson MR, and Howard HA Who publishes in “predatory” journals? Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 2015 66 1406-1417

Cited By

Wei M(2020)Research on impact evaluation of open access journalsScientometrics10.1007/s11192-019-03306-6122:2(1027-1049)Online publication date: 1-Feb-2020
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1007/s11192-019-03306-6
Holmberg KHedman JBowman TDidegah FLaakso M(2020)Do articles in open access journals have more frequent altmetric activity than articles in subscription-based journals? An investigation of the research output of Finnish universitiesScientometrics10.1007/s11192-019-03301-x122:1(645-659)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2020
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1007/s11192-019-03301-x
Heneberg P(2020)Correction to: The troubles of high-profile open access megajournalsScientometrics10.1007/s11192-019-03281-y123:2(1169-1171)Online publication date: 1-May-2020
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1007/s11192-019-03281-y

Index Terms

The troubles of high-profile open access megajournals

Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

Recommendations

Russian Scholarly Papers in Open-Access Megajournals
Abstract
The quantity, research topics, and growth rates are assessed for Russian scholarly papers published in open-access megajournals. Russian papers published in PLoS ONE in 2006–2019 are analyzed on the basis of international scientometric indicators. ...
How library and information science faculty perceive and engage with open access

This paper presents the inferential analysis of a systematic survey of North American library and information science LIS faculty awareness of, attitudes towards and experience with open-access scholarly publishing. The study reveals that engagement ...
A megajournal as a new type of scientific publication

The megajournal is a new form of an academic open-access journal that is peer reviewed for scientific and methodological soundness. Thus, the perceived importance is not assessed, leaving it to the readers to decide whether an article is of interest and ...

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Scientometrics

Scientometrics Volume 120, Issue 2

Aug 2019

550 pages

ISSN:0138-9130

Issue’s Table of Contents

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2019.

Publisher

Springer-Verlag

Berlin, Heidelberg

Publication History

Published: 01 August 2019

Received: 03 January 2019

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article

Funding Sources

Univerzita Karlova v Praze

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

3
Total Citations
View Citations
0
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)0
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

Reflects downloads up to 18 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Wei M(2020)Research on impact evaluation of open access journalsScientometrics10.1007/s11192-019-03306-6122:2(1027-1049)Online publication date: 1-Feb-2020
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1007/s11192-019-03306-6
Holmberg KHedman JBowman TDidegah FLaakso M(2020)Do articles in open access journals have more frequent altmetric activity than articles in subscription-based journals? An investigation of the research output of Finnish universitiesScientometrics10.1007/s11192-019-03301-x122:1(645-659)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2020
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1007/s11192-019-03301-x
Heneberg P(2020)Correction to: The troubles of high-profile open access megajournalsScientometrics10.1007/s11192-019-03281-y123:2(1169-1171)Online publication date: 1-May-2020
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1007/s11192-019-03281-y

View Options

View options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Issue’s Table of Contents