Open AccessArticle

Pushing the Limits of Biosensing: Selective Calcium Ion Detection with High Sensitivity via High-k Gate Dielectric Engineered Si Nanowire Random Network Channel Dual-Gate Field-Effect Transistors

Tae-Hwan Hyun

and

Won-Ju Cho

Department of Electronic Materials Engineering, Kwangwoon University, Seoul 139-701, Republic of Korea

Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.

Sensors 2023, 23(15), 6720; https://doi.org/10.3390/s23156720

Submission received: 29 June 2023 / Revised: 23 July 2023 / Accepted: 26 July 2023 / Published: 27 July 2023

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Novel Field-Effect Transistor Gas/Chem/Bio Sensing)

Download

Browse Figures

Versions Notes

Abstract

Calcium ions (Ca²⁺) are abundantly present in the human body; they perform essential roles in various biological functions. In this study, we propose a highly sensitive and selective biosensor platform for Ca²⁺ detection, which comprises a dual-gate (DG) field-effect transistor (FET) with a high-k engineered gate dielectric, silicon nanowire (SiNW) random network channel, and Ca²⁺-selective extended gate. The SiNW channel device, which was fabricated via the template transfer method, exhibits superior Ca²⁺ sensing characteristics compared to conventional film channel devices. An exceptionally high Ca²⁺ sensitivity of 208.25 mV/dec was achieved through the self-amplification of capacitively coupled DG operation and an enhanced amplification ratio resulting from the high surface-to-volume ratio of the SiNW channel. The SiNW channel device demonstrated stable and reliable sensing characteristics, as evidenced by minimal hysteresis and drift effects, with the hysteresis voltage and drift rate measuring less than 6.53% of the Ca²⁺ sensitivity. Furthermore, the Ca²⁺-selective characteristics of the biosensor platform were elucidated through experiments with pH buffer, NaCl, and KCl solutions, wherein the sensitivities of the interfering ions were below 7.82% compared to the Ca²⁺ sensitivity. The proposed Ca²⁺-selective biosensor platform exhibits exceptional performance and holds great potential in various biosensing fields.

Keywords:

biosensor; silicon nanowire random network; dual-gate field-effect transistor; self-amplification; calcium ion-selective; extended gate; capacitive coupling; high-k gate dielectric engineering

1. Introduction

Calcium ions (Ca²⁺) are the most abundant metal ions found in the human body. These ions are responsible for performing various biological functions, such as blood clotting, intercellular adhesion, skeletal integrity maintenance, and cell mobility facilitation. Maintaining appropriate Ca²⁺ levels within the body is critical for sustaining optimal biological health [1,2]. However, high concentrations of Ca²⁺ can be highly toxic, necessitating the precise regulation of physiological Ca²⁺ concentrations within specific limits. Therefore, employing appropriate analytical approaches to determine physiological concentrations of Ca²⁺ is crucial [3,4]. However, the human body comprises other cations, such as Na⁺ and K⁺. Consequently, in most cases, Ca²⁺ must be selectively detected in the presence of other interfering ions. Several studies have focused on designing sensors, such as potentiometric, galvanostatic, and colorimetric sensors, for the selective detection of Ca²⁺ [5,6,7,8].

An ion-sensitive field-effect transistor (ISFET) was first reported in the 1970s [9]. This field-effect transistor (FET)-type sensor system offers numerous advantages, such as fast response, label-free detection, and compatibility with the complementary metal-oxide-semiconductor (CMOS) process [10,11,12,13]. The concept of ISFETs has been further advanced to an extended-gate field-effect transistor (EGFET) structure, which comprises a separated extended gate (EG) sensing unit and an FET transducer unit [14,15,16,17]. By adopting the EG structure, disposable EGs can protect high-cost FETs from chemical damage, because the analyte solution is not in direct contact with the FETs. Despite their many desirable features, conventional single-gate (SG) structured ISFETs suffer from a critical drawback, known as the Nernstian limit, which restricts their sensitivity. According to this theoretical limitation, conventional ISFETs cannot exceed a sensitivity of 59.14 mV/pH at 300 K [18]. Therefore, improving their sensitivity is essential for the wider application of FET-type sensors. The dual-gate (DG) structure, which has capacitively coupled top- and bottom-gate electrodes, can amplify sensitivity itself through its structural features. Additionally, employing a high-k gate dielectric engineered DG structure, which replaces the top-gate insulator with a high-k insulator, can be employed to further improve the sensitivity of ISFETs by increasing the top-gate insulator capacitance [19,20,21,22]. Consequently, constructing DG-structured FET-type sensors is an effective and promising approach for developing highly sensitive sensor platforms that can overcome the Nernstian limit.

Silicon nanowire (SiNW) channel-based FET-type sensors have recently attracted attention as promising biosensor platforms owing to their advantageous properties such as superior sensitivity, high selectivity, and wide applicability. In recent years, numerous studies have reported various applications of SiNW channel biosensors, including detection of pH, chemicals, neurotransmitters, DNA, proteins, and viruses [23,24,25,26,27]. The high surface-to-volume ratio of the SiNW channel enhances gate capacitance and gate controllability, providing excellent charge control and operational performance [23]. Furthermore, in DG structured ISFETs, SiNW channel provides higher top-gate oxide capacitance, which results in a higher amplification of the sensitivity. However, the conventional formation process of the SiNW channels generally requires complex and expensive procedures such as vapor–liquid–solid (VLS) growth, plasma-enhanced chemical deposition (PECVD), electron beam lithography, and deep ultraviolet (DUV) photolithography [28,29,30]. Meanwhile, the template transfer method allows for the fabrication of SiNW random network channels through simpler processes such as electrospinning and reactive ion etching (RIE), which are commonly used in CMOS processing. By employing the template transfer method to create a SiNW random network channel, it is possible to easily achieve the advantages of a high surface-to-volume ratio and high gate capacitance of the SiNW channels.

In this study, we propose a high-performance Ca²⁺-selective biosensor platform based on high-k gate dielectric engineered SiNW random network channel DG FETs. The SiNW channel was fabricated using a template transfer method, utilizing polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) nanofibers as the pattern template. The electrical and sensing properties of the fabricated high-k gate dielectric engineered SiNW channel DG FETs, including the transfer curves, output curves, pH sensing, and Ca²⁺-selective sensing characteristics, were elucidated. These properties were compared to those of conventional film channel devices. Owing to the advantageous high surface-to-volume ratio of the SiNW channel, the SiNW channel device exhibited a superior sensing performance, including significantly improved self-amplification capability, sensitivity, and stability, than that of the film channel device. Therefore, the proposed high-performance Ca²⁺-selective biosensor based on high-k gate dielectric engineered SiNW random network channel DG FETs holds great promise as a sensor platform with exceptional sensitivity, remarkable selectivity, and reliable sensing characteristics, thereby enabling a wide range of applications in various biosensing fields.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

The following materials were used in this study: SiO₂ sputter target (purity ≥ 99.99%, THIFINE Co., Ltd., Incheon, Republic of Korea), glass substrates (7059 glass; Corning Inc., Corning, NY, USA), Ta₂O₅ sputter target (purity ≥ 99.99%, THIFINE Co., Ltd., Incheon, Republic of Korea), indium tin oxide (ITO) sputter target (purity ≥ 99.99%, THIFINE Co., Ltd.), SnO₂ sputter target (purity ≥ 99.99%, THIFINE Co., Ltd.), phosphosilicate glass (PSG; Filmtronics Inc., Butler, PA, USA), 30:1 buffered oxide etchant (BOE; J.T. Baker, Phillipsburg, NJ, USA), pH buffer solution (Samchun Chemical, Pyeongtack, Republic of Korea), ethanol (Samchun Chemical), polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS; Sylgard 184 silicon elastomer; Dow Corning, Midland, MI, USA), deionized water (DI water; conductivity ≤ 4.3 μS/cm, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), phosphate-buffered saline (PBS; pH 7.4, Sigma-Aldrich), Ca ionophore IV (C₅₂H₁₀₀N₂O₃, Sigma-Aldrich), 2-nitrophenyl octyl ether (purity ≥ 99.0%, Sigma-Aldrich), polyvinyl chloride (PVC, Sigma-Aldrich), sodium tetrakis [3,5-bis(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]borate (Na-TFPB, Sigma-Aldrich), tetrahydrofuran (THF, Sigma-Aldrich), sodium chloride (NaCl, Sigma-Aldrich), calcium chloride (CaCl₂, Sigma-Aldrich), and potassium chloride (KCl, Sigma-Aldrich). All the materials were used without any further purification.

We prepared CaCl₂, NaCl, and KCl solutions by dissolving CaCl₂, NaCl, and KCl, respectively, in DI water. Through sequential dilution, we prepared solutions with concentrations of 10⁰ M, 10⁻¹ M, 10⁻² M, 10⁻³ M, and 10⁻⁴ M for each ion.

2.2. Formation of SiNW Random Network Channel via the Template Transfer Method

A SiNW random network channel was obtained using a template transfer method employing electrospun PVP nanofibers. This method offers a straightforward approach for creating a SiNW random network structure through electrospinning and RIE. The formation process of the SiNW channel commenced with the preparation of a silicon-on-insulator (SOI) substrate with defined active regions and n-doped source/drain (S/D) electrodes, as described in Section 2.3. To confine the SiNW pattern to the channel area, the S/D regions were protected by depositing a 200 nm SiO₂ layer, which was patterned using a lift-off process. Subsequently, PVP nanofibers were deposited as a pattern template via an electrospinning process utilizing a PVP precursor solution under a controlled humidity of 25% and room temperature (25 °C). The PVP precursor solution was prepared by dissolving 200 mg of PVP in 3 mL of ethanol, followed by stirring at 800 RPM for 4 h at room temperature. Figure 1 shows a schematic of the electrospinning system.

After the electrospinning process, conventional thermal annealing (CTA) was performed in a furnace system at 300 °C, which is the melting point of PVP nanofibers. This step was performed to solidify the patterned template and enhance its adhesion to the Si film. The pattern template of the PVP nanofibers was then transferred onto the underlying Si channel layer through RIE in an SF₆ plasma ambient. Any residual PVP nanofibers were removed via wet etching using a sulfuric acid–hydrogen peroxide mixture. Finally, the shielding oxide layers were removed using a 30:1 buffered oxide etchant (BOE). Figure 2 illustrates the process flow of the template transfer method using electrospun PVP nanofibers.

2.3. Fabrication of the SiNW DG FET Transducer Unit

A 1 × 1 cm² p-type (100) SOI substrate with a 100 nm thick top silicon layer and 200 nm thick buried oxide (BOX) layer was prepared. The resistivity and boron doping concentration of the top silicon layer were 1–10 Ω·cm and 1 × 10¹⁵ cm⁻³, respectively. To eliminate surface impurities and contaminants, the substrate was cleaned via a standard Radio Corporation of America (RCA) cleaning process. Active regions with a channel layer width/length of 130/90 μm were formed using photolithography and RIE. A 200 nm thick SiO₂ layer was blanket-deposited using RF magnetron sputtering as a dummy oxide for the phosphorus doping process. The source and drain (S/D) areas were patterned using photolithography, followed by the use of 30:1 BOE to etch the dummy oxide on the S/D area. For n+ doping of the S/D regions, a PSG film was spin-coated and thermally diffused using a rapid thermal annealing (RTA) process at 950 °C for 30 s in an O₂/N₂ ambient. The residual PSG and dummy oxide layers were removed using 30:1 BOE. Next, the SiNW channel formation process was performed, as described in Section 2.2. After the SiNW channel was formed, a 20 nm thick SiO₂ layer and an 80 nm thick Ta₂O₅ layer were deposited as high-k engineered top-gate oxides using RF magnetron sputtering and a lift-off process. A top-gate electrode of 150 nm thick Al was formed using an electron-beam evaporator and the lift-off process. Simultaneously, a film channel DG FET was fabricated as a reference device without SiNW channel formation. To enhance the overall electrical properties of the fabricated devices, a forming gas annealing (FGA) process was performed at 450 °C for 30 min in a 2% H₂/N₂ atmosphere in a furnace. Figure 3 shows a schematic of the fabricated SiNW DG FET transducer unit.

2.4. Fabrication of Ca²⁺-Selective EG Sensing Unit

The EG sensing unit was fabricated on a glass substrate (1.5 cm × 2.5 cm). A 300 nm thick ITO layer was deposited as the conductive layer, which was electrically connected to the top-gate electrode of the transducer through an electrical cable. Subsequently, a 50 nm thick layer of SnO₂ was deposited as a sensing membrane. The SnO₂ sensing membrane transfers the surface potential of the analyte solution to the transducer unit via the ITO conductive layer. The ITO and SnO₂ layers were deposited using an RF magnetron sputtering system. To form a Ca²⁺-selective membrane, a Ca²⁺-selective cocktail (100 μL) was drop-casted onto the SnO₂ sensing layer and allowed to dry in ambient air at room temperature for 24 h to evaporate the solvent and enhance adhesion. The Ca²⁺-selective cocktail was prepared by dissolving 1.2 mg of Ca ionophore IV, 0.3 mg of Na-TFPB, 32.5 mg of PVC, and 66 mg of 2-nitrophenyl octyl ether in 660 μL of THF. The mixture was then stirred at 800 RPM for 6 h at room temperature. Finally, a sensing region with a diameter of 0.6 cm was defined by attaching a PDMS reservoir to the center of the Ca²⁺-selective membrane. The process flow of the Ca²⁺-selective EG sensing unit is illustrated in Figure 4.

2.5. Device Characterization

The thicknesses of Si, Al, SiO₂, Ta₂O₅, SnO₂, ITO, and drop-casted Ca²⁺-selective membranes were measured using a Dektak XT Bruker stylus profiler (Bruker, Hamburg, Germany). The electrical characteristics of the devices were measured using an Agilent 4156 B precision semiconductor parameter analyzer (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). A commercial Ag/AgCl electrode (Horiba 2086A-06T, Kyoto, Japan) was used as the reference electrode for pH and Ca²⁺-selective sensor platforms. To minimize external interference, all the electrical measurements were performed in an electromagnetically shielded dark box. Figure 5a,b shows the optical microscopic images of the fabricated high-k gate dielectric engineered SiNW and film channel DG FET, respectively. The thickness of the Ca²⁺-selective membrane was approximately 5.3 μm, as depicted in Figure 5c. The inset of Figure 5c shows a photograph of the fabricated EG sensing unit.

3. Results

3.1. Electrical Characteristics of High-k Gate Dielectric Engineered SiNW Channel DG FETs

We fabricated FET-type sensors based on high-k gate dielectric engineered SiNW channel DG FETs. The operation of the fabricated FET transducer units enabled the sensing functions of the entire sensor platform. Therefore, prior to evaluating the sensing performance, the electrical characteristics of the fabricated SiNW and film channel DG FETs were compared. Figure 6 illustrates the electrical characteristics of the SiNW and film channel DG FETs. The transfer characteristic (I_DS-V_G) curves for the top-gate operation of the SiNW and film channel DG FETs are presented in Figure 6a,b, respectively. Meanwhile, Figure 6c,d depicts the transfer characteristic curves for the bottom-gate operations of the SiNW and film channel DG FETs, respectively. The insets show the corresponding output characteristic (I_DS-V_D) curves. Transfer characteristic curves were obtained at a drain voltage (V_D) of 1 V. While sweeping either the top- or bottom-gate voltage, the other gate electrode was connected to the ground electrode. To quantitatively compare the measured electrical characteristics of the SiNW channel DG FETs with those of film channel devices, we extracted various electrical parameters, as summarized in Table 1. Although the values of the threshold voltage (V_TH) and on/off current ratio (I_ON/OFF) were similar, the SiNW channel DG FETs exhibited better field-effect mobility (μ_FE) and subthreshold swing (SS) values compared to those of the film channel device. Overall, a comparison of electrical characteristics indicates that the SiNW channel DG FETs possess favorable properties for sensor applications, demonstrating improved field-effect mobility and subthreshold swing values.

3.2. Self-Amplification Capabilities of High-k Gate Dielectric Engineered DG FETs

The fabricated FET devices comprised two gate electrodes: top-gate and bottom-gate electrodes. In the proposed sensor platform, the top-gate electrode is connected to the EG sensing unit, and the FETs can be operated in either SG or DG modes. Figure 7a,b depicts the electrical connections of the sensor platform in the SG and DG modes, respectively. In the SG mode (Figure 7a), only the top-gate electrode was utilized, which retained the theoretical limitation of the sensitivity associated with conventional ISFETs. However, in the DG mode (Figure 7b), the capacitive coupling between the two gate electrodes enabled the self-amplification of the sensitivity. Figure 7c shows a cross-sectional view of the metal-oxide-semiconductor capacitor (MOSCAP) structure of the high-k gate dielectric engineered DG FETs. The equivalent electrical circuit of the MOSCAP structure, excluding the parasitic components, is shown in Figure 7d. As shown in Figure 7d, the top-gate voltage (V_TG) and bottom-gate voltage (V_BG) are capacitively coupled based on the capacitances of the top-gate insulator (C_Tox) and bottom-gate insulator (C_Box). Because the depletion capacitance of the Si channel (C_Si) is negligible, the relationship between ΔV_TG and ΔV_BG in the DG mode can be expressed as in Equation (1). Because the top-gate electrode was connected to the EG sensing unit, V_TG was equivalent to the surface potential (ψ₀) of the analyte solution (V_TG = ψ₀).

Δ V_{BG} = \frac{C_{Tox}}{C_{Box}} Δ V_{TG},

(1)

This relationship indicates that the sensitivity of the proposed sensor platform can be amplified by the amplification factor of C_Tox/C_Box due to capacitance coupling. Notably, a larger amplification factor can be achieved using a larger C_Tox. We deliberately fabricated DG FETs with different C_Tox and C_Box values by varying the oxide thickness. To achieve a higher C_Tox/C_Box, we adopted a high-k gate dielectric engineered top-gate insulator structure by utilizing stacked oxide layers of SiO₂/Ta₂O₅, which resulted in a higher C_Tox compared to that of single SiO₂ oxide layers with the same thickness. Moreover, when compared to conventional film channel DG FETs, SiNW channel devices exhibit greater C_Tox owing to the high surface-to-volume ratio of the SiNW channel devices.

3.3. pH Sensing Characteristics of High-k Gate Dielectric Engineered SiNW Channel DG FETs

The pH sensing characteristics of the high-k gate dielectric engineered SiNW channel DG FETs were investigated in both the SG and DG modes to verify their detection and self-amplification capabilities for the surface potential of the analyte solution. For pH sensing characterization, the SnO₂ layer was used as the sensing membrane of the sensor platform without the formation of a Ca²⁺-selective membrane. Figure 8 illustrates the pH sensing characteristics of the fabricated sensors. The transfer characteristic curves of the SiNW channel device at various pH values in the SG and DG modes are shown in Figure 8a,b, respectively. The transfer characteristic curves of the film channel device in the SG and DG modes are shown in Figure 8d and Figure 8e, respectively. The pH sensitivities were evaluated from these transfer characteristic curves by calculating the shift in the reference voltage (V_REF). The V_REF values were obtained at a read current (I_R) of 1 nA. The calculated pH sensitivities of the SiNW and film channel devices are presented in Figure 8c,f, respectively. In the SG mode, the pH sensitivities of the SiNW and film channel devices were 57.74 and 58.79 mV/pH, respectively, demonstrating no significant difference between the SiNW and film channel DG FETs. In addition, none of the devices exceeded the Nernstian limit of 59.14 mV/pH. However, in the DG mode, the pH sensitivities of the SiNW and film channel devices were 325.38 and 247.05 mV/pH, respectively. Notably, the SiNW channel device amplified the pH sensitivity 5.51 times, whereas the film channel device amplified it 4.2 times. Because of its high surface-to-volume ratio, the SiNW channel device exhibited a higher amplification factor, resulting in a greater pH sensitivity. Thus, SiNW channel DG FETs can exhibit a pH sensing performance superior to that of conventional film channel devices.

In addition to pH sensitivity, non-ideal effects such as hysteresis and drift can affect the sensing characteristics of FET-type sensor platforms. Direct contact between the EG sensing unit and analyte solution can result in chemical damage to the sensing membrane, leading to a decrease in sensing performance. Hysteresis effects are influenced by the presence of buried OH sites and the transport of defects within the sensing membrane [31,32,33]. However, drift effects arise from the hopping or trap-limited transport of OH-related species [34,35,36,37]. Figure 9a,b displays the hysteresis effects of the SiNW and film channel DG FETs in the SG and DG modes, respectively. The hysteresis effects were evaluated by varying the pH values as 7 − 4 − 7 − 10 − 7. Transfer characteristic curves were measured every 2 min for 50 min. The hysteresis voltage (V_H) was determined by calculating the difference between the initial and final V_REF values. In the SG mode, the resulting V_H values for SiNW and film channel devices were 4.85 and 2.22 mV, respectively, while in DG mode, the corresponding values were 12.13 and 12.06 mV, respectively. The drift effects of the SiNW and film channel DG FETs in the SG and DG modes are depicted in Figure 9c,d, respectively. The drift rate (R_D) was measured after the sensing membrane was immersed in a pH 7 buffer solution for 10 h. The fabricated SiNW and film channel devices exhibited R_D values of 6.25 and 4.71 mV/h, respectively, in the SG mode. In the DG mode, the corresponding values were 14.37 and 13.38 mV/h, respectively. Table 2 presents the pH sensing characteristics of the fabricated devices, including pH sensitivity, V_H, R_D, V_H-to-pH sensitivity, and R_D-to-pH sensitivity. The results indicated that the DG mode operation yielded higher values for both V_H and R_D, as well as pH sensitivity, compared to the SG mode for both the SiNW and film channel devices. However, when considering the V_H-to-pH sensitivity and R_D-to-pH sensitivity, the increase in the V_H and R_D values was notably lower than the increase in pH sensitivity for each device. Furthermore, the SiNW channel device exhibited a more significant reduction in both V_H-to-pH sensitivity and R_D-to-pH sensitivity in the DG mode compared to the film channel device. These findings suggest that capacitive coupling in the DG mode is an effective approach for amplifying the sensitivity beyond the theoretical limit, resulting in higher sensitivity, stability, and reliability. Consequently, the proposed high-k gate dielectric engineered SiNW channel DG FET demonstrates promising potential as a high-performance sensor platform, offering highly sensitive and stable sensing characteristics.

3.4. Ca²⁺-Selective Sensing Characteristics of the High-k Gate Dielectric Engineered SiNW Channel DG FETs

After successfully demonstrating the high-performance sensing capabilities of the fabricated high-k gate dielectric engineered SiNW channel DG FET sensor platform, we applied our device to practical biosensing applications, specifically, the selective detection of Ca²⁺. To enable the device as a Ca²⁺-selective sensor, we fabricated a Ca²⁺-selective EG by forming a Ca²⁺-selective membrane on a SnO₂ layer. The detailed fabrication process of the Ca²⁺-selective EG sensing unit is described in Section 2.4. Figure 10a,b presents the transfer characteristic curves of the SiNW channel devices in the SG and DG modes, respectively, with varying Ca²⁺ concentrations. The corresponding results for the film channel devices are shown in Figure 10d,e, respectively. The transfer characteristic curves were measured using CaCl₂ solutions with varying Ca²⁺ concentrations. As the Ca²⁺ concentration increased, the transfer characteristic curves shifted in the negative direction. Figure 10c,f show the Ca²⁺ sensitivities of the SiNW and film channel devices, respectively. The V_REF values were obtained at an I_R of 1 nA. In the SG mode, the Ca²⁺ sensitivities of the SiNW and film channel devices were 37.44 and 34.45 mV/dec, respectively. In the DG mode, the corresponding Ca²⁺ sensitivities were 208.25 and 139.41 mV/dec, respectively. While both devices exhibited similar Ca²⁺ sensitivities in the SG mode, the Ca²⁺ sensitivities of the SiNW and film channel devices were amplified by factors of 5.51 and 4.04, respectively, in the DG mode. This result is consistent with the findings observed in the pH sensing operations described in Section 3.3. Therefore, the fabricated Ca²⁺ sensor based on the high-k gate dielectric engineered SiNW channel DG FET demonstrated highly sensitive characteristics, suggesting its potential for various biosensing applications.

To verify the stability and reliability of the fabricated Ca²⁺ sensor, we conducted hysteresis and drift effect measurements during the Ca²⁺ sensing operations. Figure 11a,b shows the hysteresis effects of the SiNW and film channel devices with CaCl₂ solutions in the SG and DG modes, respectively. We measured the hysteresis effects of the Ca²⁺ sensing operations for 45 min, changing the Ca²⁺ concentration every 5 min according to the following CaCl₂ concentration loop: 10⁻⁴ − 10⁻³ − 10⁻² − 10⁻¹ − 10⁰ − 10⁻¹ − 10⁻² − 10⁻³ − 10⁻⁴ M. V_REF values were extracted from the transfer characteristic curves measured every 1 min. In the SG mode, the V_H values of SiNW and film channel devices were 3.65 and 3.06 mV, respectively. In the DG mode, the corresponding values were 13.60 and 12.76 mV, respectively. Figure 11c,d shows the drift rates of the SiNW and film channel devices, respectively, for Ca²⁺ operation. The R_D values of the SiNW and film channel devices were monitored for 10 h, while the Ca²⁺-selective membrane of EG was immersed in a 10⁻⁴ M CaCl₂ solution. In the SG mode, the R_D values of SiNW and film channel devices were 7.59 and 6.69 mV/h, respectively. In the DG mode, the corresponding values were 13.22 and 13.38 mV/h, respectively. Table 3 summarizes the Ca²⁺-sensing characteristics of the high-k gate dielectric engineered DG FETs. Although the V_H and R_D values increased in the DG mode compared to the SG mode, the increase in these non-ideal effects was much smaller than the increase in the Ca²⁺ sensitivity of both devices. Moreover, in the DG mode, the SiNW channel device significantly reduced the V_H and R_D to Ca²⁺ sensitivity from 9.74% to 6.65% and 20.27% to 6.34%, respectively. The observed enhancement in stability is consistent with the pH sensing results and is attributed to the high amplification capability of the SiNW channel device. Thus, we verified the stable Ca²⁺ sensing characteristics of the fabricated high-k gate dielectric engineered SiNW channel DG FETs.

To establish Ca²⁺-selective sensing characteristics, we measured the pH, Na⁺, and K⁺ sensitivities of Ca²⁺-selective EG using pH buffer, NaCl, and KCl solutions, respectively. Figure 12a,b depicts the Ca²⁺-selective sensing characteristics of the SiNW and film channel devices, respectively, in the SG mode. Among the interfering ions, including H⁺, Na²⁺, and K⁺, the highest interfering-ion sensitivities were only 7.95% and 7.72% for the Ca²⁺ sensitivities of the SiNW and film channel devices, respectively. Figure 12c,d shows the Ca²⁺-selective sensing characteristics of the SiNW and film channel devices, respectively, in the DG mode. The maximum interfering-ion sensitivities measured in the DG mode were 7.82% and 12.62% for the Ca²⁺ sensitivities of the SiNW channel and film channel devices, respectively. The interfering-ion sensitivities are assumed to be amplified along with the Ca²⁺ sensitivities, proportional to the amplification factor, as the interfering-ion sensitivity arises from the transfer of the ion’s surface potential (ψ₀) to the sensing membrane [38,39,40,41]. However, considering that the interfering-ion sensitivity in the DG mode for the SiNW channel device was limited to less than 7.82% of the Ca²⁺ sensitivity, this corresponds to a negligible value that does not significantly hinder the selective Ca²⁺ sensing operation. Therefore, these findings suggest that the fabricated Ca²⁺-selective sensor, constructed with high-k gate dielectric engineered SiNW channel DG FETs, exhibits extensive versatility as a high-performance biosensor platform, owing to its ultrasensitive and highly selective sensing characteristics for the selective detection of Ca²⁺. Table 4 summarizes the pH, Na⁺, K⁺, and Ca²⁺ sensing characteristics of the high-k gate dielectric engineered DG FETs.

4. Conclusions

In this study, we present a high-performance biosensor platform based on high-k gate dielectric engineered SiNW random network channel DG FETs for the selective detection of Ca²⁺. The proposed sensor platform combines the advantages of high-k gate dielectric engineered SiNW channel DG FETs as transducer units and separate EG as a sensing unit. The template transfer method using PVP nanofibers enabled the fabrication of SiNW channels. Due to the high surface-to-volume ratio of the SiNW channel structure, top-gate oxide capacitance of the SiNW channel device could be larger, thereby enhancing the self-amplification capability of capacitively coupled DG FETs. In addition to the SiNW channel device, a conventional film channel device was fabricated to validate the improved characteristics of the sensor platform. The electrical characteristics and pH-sensing capabilities of the sensor platform were thoroughly evaluated to lay the foundation for Ca²⁺ detection. The integration of a Ca²⁺-selective membrane to the fabricated sensor platform resulted in remarkable Ca²⁺ sensitivity, with the SiNW channel device achieving a sensitivity of 208.25 mV/dec, surpassing that of the film channel device by 149%. The assessment of non-ideal effects, such as hysteresis and drift, demonstrated that the fabricated SiNW channel device effectively mitigated these effects, with the V_H and R_D values remaining below 6.53% despite the enhanced Ca²⁺ sensitivity. To further assess its selective sensing capabilities, the sensitivity of the platform to interfering ions, including H⁺, K⁺, and Na⁺, was evaluated using a pH buffer, KCl, and NaCl solutions. Although the interfering-ion sensitivities were also amplified in proportion to the Ca²⁺ sensitivity, the SiNW channel device exhibited a sensitivity of less than 7.82% of the amplified Ca²⁺ sensitivity. These results confirm the successful application of the proposed sensor platform as a high-performance biosensor. Therefore, the proposed high-performance biosensor platform based on high-k gate dielectric engineered SiNW random network channel DG FETs demonstrated highly sensitive and selective characteristics with reliable sensing operation. These exhibit promising potential for broad applications in various biosensing fields, highlighting applicability and versatile capabilities in biomedical diagnostics, environmental monitoring, and food safety analysis.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, T.-H.H. and W.-J.C.; Methodology, T.-H.H. and W.-J.C.; Software, W.-J.C.; Validation, W.-J.C.; Formal Analysis, T.-H.H. and W.-J.C.; Investigation, T.-H.H. and W.-J.C.; Resources, W.-J.C.; Data Curation, T.-H.H.; Writing—Original Draft Preparation, T.-H.H.; Writing—Review and Editing, W.-J.C.; Visualization, T.-H.H.; Supervision, W.-J.C.; Project Administration, W.-J.C.; Funding Acquisition, W.-J.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The present research has been conducted by the Research Grant of Kwangwoon University in 2023 and by the Excellent research support project of Kwangwoon University in 2023.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The present research has been funded by the Research Grant of Kwangwoon University in 2023 and by the Excellent research support project of Kwangwoon University in 2023. The work reported in this paper was conducted during the sabbatical year of Kwangwoon University in 2023.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

Brown, E.M.; Pollak, M.; Seidman, C.E.; Seidman, J.G.; Chou, Y.-H.W.; Riccardi, D.; Hebert, S.C. Calcium-ion–sensing cell-surface receptors. N. Engl. J. Med. 1995, 333, 234–240. [Google Scholar]
Shortreed, M.; Kopelman, R.; Kuhn, M.; Hoyland, B. Fluorescent fiber-optic calcium sensor for physiological measurements. Anal. Chem. 1996, 68, 1414–1418. [Google Scholar]
Weaver, C.M.; Peacock, M. Calcium. Adv. Nutr. 2019, 10, 546–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Balk, E.M.; Adam, G.P.; Langberg, V.N.; Earley, A.; Clark, P.; Ebeling, P.R.; Mithal, A.; Rizzoli, R.; Zerbini, C.A.F.; Pierroz, D.D.; et al. Global dietary calcium intake among adults: A systematic review. Osteoporos. Int. 2017, 28, 3315–3324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Singh, A.K.; Mehtab, S. Calcium(II)-selective potentiometric sensor based on α-furildioxime as neutral carrier. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2007, 123, 429–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Wang, Y.; Xu, H.; Yang, X.; Luo, Z.; Zhang, J.; Li, G. All-solid-state blood calcium sensors based on screen-printed poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) as the solid contact. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2012, 173, 630–635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Bedlechowicz, I.; Sokalski, T.; Lewenstam, A.; Maj-Zurawska, M. Calcium ion-selective electrodes under galvanostatic current control. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2005, 108, 836–839. [Google Scholar]
Kim, S.; Park, J.W.; Kim, D.; Kim, D.; Lee, I.-H.; Jon, S. Bioinspired colorimetric detection of calcium(ii) ions in serum using calsequestrin-functionalized gold nanoparticles. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 4138–4141. [Google Scholar]
Bergveld, P. Development of an ion-sensitive solid-state device for neurophysiological measurements. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 1970, 17, 70–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Cao, S.; Sun, P.; Xiao, G.; Tang, Q.; Sun, X.; Zhao, H.; Zhao, S.; Lu, H.; Yue, Z. ISFET-based sensors for (bio)chemical applications: A review. Electrochem. Sci. Adv. 2022, 4, e2100207. [Google Scholar]
Archbold, G.; Parra, C.; Carrillo, H.; Mouazen, A.M. Towards the implementation of isfet sensors for in-situ and real-time chemical analyses in soils: A practical review. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2023, 209, 107828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Srikanya, D.; Bhat, A.M.; Sahu, C. Design and analysis of high-performance double-gate ZnO nano-structured thin-film ISFET for pH sensing applications. Microelectron. J. 2023, 137, 105811. [Google Scholar]
Rovira, M.; Lafaye, C.; Wang, S.; Fernandez-Sanchez, C.; Saubade, M.; Liu, S.-C.; Jimenez-Jorquera, C. Analytical assessment of sodium ISFET based sensors for sweat analysis. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2023, 393, 134135. [Google Scholar]
van der Spiegel, J.; Lauks, I.; Chan, P.; Babic, D. The extended gate chemically sensitive field effect transistor as multi-species microprobe. Sens. Actuators 1983, 4, 291–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Slewa, L.H.; Abbas, T.A.; Ahmed, N.M. Effect of Sn doping and annealing on the morphology, structural, optical, and electrical properties of 3D (micro/nano) V₂O₅ sphere for high sensitivity pH-EGFET sensor. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2020, 305, 127515. [Google Scholar]
Wang, J.-L.; Yang, P.-Y.; Hsieh, T.-Y.; Hwang, C.-C.; Juang, M.-H. pH-sensing characteristics of hydrothermal Al-doped ZnO nanostructures. J. Nanomater. 2013, 2013, e152079. [Google Scholar]
Sabah, F.A.; Ahmed, N.M.; Hassan, Z.; Almessiere, M.A. Influence of CuS membrane annealing time on the sensitivity of EGFET pH sensor. Mater. Sci. Semicond. Process. 2017, 71, 217–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Madeira, G.D.M.; Mello, N.P.D.; Faleiros, M.C.; Mulato, M.C. Model improvement for super-Nernstian pH sensors: The effect of surface hydration. J. Mater. Sci. 2021, 56, 2738–2747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Jang, H.-J.; Bae, T.-E.; Cho, W.-J. Improved sensing performance of polycrystalline-silicon based dual-gate ion-sensitive field-effect transistors using high-k stacking engineered sensing membrane. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2012, 100, 253703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Khwairakpam, D.S.; Pukhrambam, P.D. Sensitivity optimization of a double-gated ISFET pH-sensor with HfO₂/SiO₂ gate dielectric stack. Microelectron. J. 2021, 118, 105282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Lu, C.-H.; Hou, T.-H.; Pan, T.-M. High-performance double-gate α-InGaZnO ISFET pH sensor using a HfO₂ gate dielectric. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 2018, 65, 237–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Kumar, N.; Bhatt, D.; Sutradhar, M.; Panda, S. Interface mechanisms involved in a-IGZO based dual gate ISFET pH sensor using Al₂O₃ as the top gate dielectric. Mater. Sci. Semicond. Process. 2020, 119, 105239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Schmidt, V.; Wittemann, J.V.; Senz, S.; Gösele, U. Silicon nanowires: A review on aspects of their growth and their electrical properties. Adv. Mater. 2009, 21, 2681–2702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Raman, S.; Sankar, A.R.; Sindhuja, M. Advances in silicon nanowire applications in energy generation, storage, sensing, and electronics: A review. Nanotechnology 2023, 34, 182001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Hasan, M.; Huq, M.F.; Mahmood, Z.H. A review on electronic and optical properties of silicon nanowire and its different growth techniques. Springerplus 2013, 2, 151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Cho, H.; Kim, K.; Yoon, J.-S.; Rim, T.; Meyyappan, M.; Baek, C.-K. Optimization of signal to noise ratio in silicon nanowire ISFET sensors. IEEE Sens. J. 2017, 17, 2792–2796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Kim, S.; Rim, T.; Kim, K.; Lee, U.; Baek, E.; Lee, H.; Baek, C.K.; Meyyappan, M.; Deen, M.J.; Lee, J.S. Silicon nanowire ion sensitive field effect transistor with integrated Ag/AgCl electrode: pH sensing and noise characteristics. Analyst 2011, 136, 5012–5016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Clément, N.; Nishiguchi, K.; Dufreche, J.F.; Guerin, D.; Fujiwara, A.; Vuillaume, D. A Silicon nanowire ion-sensitive field-effect transistor with elementary charge sensitivity. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2011, 98, 014104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Nair, P.R.; Alam, M.A. Design considerations of silicon nanowire biosensors. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 2007, 54, 3400–3408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Kim, K.; Park, C.; Rim, T.; Meyyappan, M.; Lee, J.-S. Electrical and pH sensing characteristics of si nanowire-based suspended FET biosensors. In Proceedings of the 14th IEEE International Conference on Nanotechnology, Toronto, ON, Canada, 18–21 August 2014. [Google Scholar]
Tsai, C.-N.; Chou, J.-C.; Sun, T.-P.; Hsiung, S.-K. Study on the sensing characteristics and hysteresis effect of the tin oxide pH electrode. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2005, 108, 877–882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Chou, J.-C.; Weng, C.-Y. Sensitivity and hysteresis effect in Al₂O₃ gate pH-ISFET. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2001, 71, 120–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Bousse, L.; Mostarshed, S.; van der Schoot, B.; de Rooij, N.F. Comparison of the hysteresis of Ta₂O₅ and Si₃N₄ pH-sensing insulators. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 1994, 17, 157–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Jamasb, S.; Collins, S.; Smith, R.L. A physical model for drift in pH ISFETs. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 1998, 49, 146–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Bousse, L.; Bergveld, P. The role of buried OH sites in the response mechanism of inorganic-gate pH-sensitive ISFETs. Sens. Actuators 1984, 6, 65–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Kwon, D.-H.; Cho, B.-W.; Kim, C.-S.; Sohn, B.-K. Effects of heat treatment on Ta₂O₅ sensing membrane for low drift and high sensitivity pH-ISFET. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 1996, 34, 441–445. [Google Scholar]
Zeng, Z.; Wei, W.; Li, B.; Gao, M.; Chim, W.K.; Zhu, C. Low drift reference-less ISFET comprising two graphene films with different engineered sensitivities. ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. 2022, 4, 416–423. [Google Scholar]
Bakker, E.; Pretsch, E.; Bühlmann, P. Selectivity of potentiometric ion sensors. Anal. Chem. 2000, 72, 1127–1133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Tran, T.N.T.; Qiu, S.; Chung, H.-J. Potassium ion selective electrode using polyaniline and matrix-supported ion-selective PVC membrane. IEEE Sens. J. 2018, 18, 9081–9087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Chen, X.-W.; Huang, S.-R.; Huang, N.-T. Dual ion-selective membrane deposited ion-sensitive field-effect transistor (DISM-ISFET) integrating whole blood processing microchamber for in situ blood ion testing. In Proceedings of the 2023 IEEE 36th International Conference on Micro Electro Mechanical Systems (MEMS), Munich, Germany, 15–19 January 2023. [Google Scholar]
van den Berg, A.; Grisel, A.; Verney-Norberg, E. An ISFET-based calcium sensor using a photopolymerized polysiloxane membrane. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 1991, 4, 235–238. [Google Scholar]

Figure 1. Schematic of the electrospinning system. The electrospinning process was conducted under controlled conditions with a humidity of 25% and temperature of 25 °C.

Figure 2. Process flow of the template transfer method using electrospun PVP nanofibers.

Figure 3. Schematic of the fabricated SiNW DG FET transducer unit.

Figure 4. Fabrication flow of the Ca²⁺-selective EG sensing unit.

Figure 5. Optical microscopic images of the fabricated high-k dielectric engineered (a) SiNW random network channel and (b) film channel DG FETs. (c) Thickness of the drop-casted Ca²⁺-selective membrane. The inset image is a photograph of the fabricated EG sensing unit.

Figure 6. Electrical characteristics of the fabricated devices. Transfer characteristic curves for the top-gate operations of (a) SiNW and (b) film channel DG FETs, as well as the bottom-gate operations of (c) SiNW and (d) film channel DG FETs.

Figure 7. Schematic of electrical connections in (a) SG mode and (b) DG mode for the sensor platform. (c) Cross-sectional view of the MOSCAP structure of high-k gate dielectric engineered DG FET. (d) Schematic of the electrical equivalent circuit.

Figure 8. pH sensing characteristics of high-k gate dielectric engineered DG FETs. Transfer characteristic curves of the SiNW channel device in (a) SG and (b) DG mode with varying pH values. Transfer characteristic curves of the film channel device in the (d) SG and (e) DG mode with varying pH values. pH sensitivities of the (c) SiNW and (f) film channel devices.

Figure 9. Non-ideal effects of high-k gate dielectric engineered DG FETs during pH sensing operations. Hysteresis effects of SiNW and film channel devices in the (a) SG and (b) DG modes. Drift effects of SiNW and film channel devices in the (c) SG and (d) DG modes.

Figure 10. Ca²⁺ sensing characteristics of high-k gate dielectric engineered DG FETs. Transfer characteristic curves of the SiNW channel device in the (a) SG and (b) DG modes with varying Ca²⁺ concentrations. Transfer characteristic curves of the film channel device in the (d) SG and (e) DG modes with varying Ca²⁺ concentrations. Ca²⁺ sensitivities of the (c) SiNW and (f) film channel devices.

Figure 11. Non-ideal effects of high-k gate dielectric engineered DG FETs with Ca²⁺ sensing operations. Hysteresis effect of high-k gate dielectric engineered DG FETs in the (a) SG and (b) DG modes. Drift effects of high-k gate dielectric engineered DG FETs in the (c) SG and (d) DG modes.

Figure 12. Ca²⁺-selective sensing characteristics of high-k gate dielectric engineered DG FETs. Various ion (H⁺, Na⁺, K⁺, and Ca²⁺) sensitivities of (a) SiNW channel device in SG mode, (b) film channel device in SG mode, (c) SiNW channel device in DG mode, and (d) film channel device in DG mode.

Table 1. Electrical parameters evaluated from the transfer characteristic curves, including threshold voltage (V_TH), on/off current ratio (I_ON/OFF), field-effect mobility (μ_FE), and subthreshold swing (SS).

Operating Electrode	Channel Type	V_TH (V)	I_ON/OFF (A/A)	μ_FE (cm²/V·s)	SS (mV/dec)
Top gate	SiNW	−0.5	2.7 × 10⁶	308.6	136.1
Top gate	Film	−0.8	1.1 × 10⁶	280.91	144.2
Bottom gate	SiNW	−1.5	1.7 × 10⁵	159.6	172.1
Bottom gate	Film	−2.4	7.4 × 10⁵	134.2	181.7

Table 2. pH sensing characteristics of high-k gate dielectric engineered DG FETs, including pH sensitivity, hysteresis voltage (V_H), drift rate (R_D), V_H-to-pH sensitivity, and R_D-to-pH sensitivity.

Operation Mode	Channel Type	pH Sensitivity (mV/pH)	V_H (mV)	R_D (mV/h)	V_H-to-pH Sensitivity	R_D-to-pH Sensitivity
SG mode	SiNW	57.74	4.85	6.25	8.3%	10.82%
SG mode	Film	58.79	2.22	4.71	3.77%	8.01%
DG mode	SiNW	325.38	12.13	14.37	3.72%	4.41%
DG mode	Film	247.05	12.06	13.38	4.88%	5.41%

Table 3. Ca²⁺ sensing characteristics of high-k gate dielectric engineered DG FETs.

Operation Mode	Channel Type	Ca²⁺ Sensitivity (mV/dev)	V_H (mV)	R_D (mV/h)	V_H-to-Ca²⁺ Sensitivity	R_D-to-Ca²⁺ Sensitivity
SG mode	SiNW	37.44	3.65	7.59	9.74%	20.27%
SG mode	Film	34.45	3.06	6.69	8.88%	19.41%
DG mode	SiNW	208.25	13.60	13.22	6.53%	6.34%
DG mode	Film	139.41	12.76	13.38	9.15%	9.59%

Table 4. Summary of the pH, Na⁺, K⁺, and Ca²⁺ sensing characteristics of high-k gate dielectric engineered DG FETs.

Operation Mode	Channel Type	pH Sensitivity (mV/pH)	Na⁺ Sensitivity (mV/dec)	K⁺ Sensitivity (mV/dec)	Ca²⁺ Sensitivity (mV/dec)
SG mode	SiNW	2.56	2.98	2.50	37.44
SG mode	Film	1.57	2.12	2.66	34.45
DG mode	SiNW	15.03	16.30	14.18	208.25
DG mode	Film	8.47	17.60	14.95	139.41

Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hyun, T.-H.; Cho, W.-J. Pushing the Limits of Biosensing: Selective Calcium Ion Detection with High Sensitivity via High-k Gate Dielectric Engineered Si Nanowire Random Network Channel Dual-Gate Field-Effect Transistors. Sensors 2023, 23, 6720. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23156720

AMA Style

Hyun T-H, Cho W-J. Pushing the Limits of Biosensing: Selective Calcium Ion Detection with High Sensitivity via High-k Gate Dielectric Engineered Si Nanowire Random Network Channel Dual-Gate Field-Effect Transistors. Sensors. 2023; 23(15):6720. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23156720

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hyun, Tae-Hwan, and Won-Ju Cho. 2023. "Pushing the Limits of Biosensing: Selective Calcium Ion Detection with High Sensitivity via High-k Gate Dielectric Engineered Si Nanowire Random Network Channel Dual-Gate Field-Effect Transistors" Sensors 23, no. 15: 6720. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23156720

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Menu

Pushing the Limits of Biosensing: Selective Calcium Ion Detection with High Sensitivity via High-k Gate Dielectric Engineered Si Nanowire Random Network Channel Dual-Gate Field-Effect Transistors

Abstract

1. Introduction

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

2.2. Formation of SiNW Random Network Channel via the Template Transfer Method

2.3. Fabrication of the SiNW DG FET Transducer Unit

2.4. Fabrication of Ca²⁺-Selective EG Sensing Unit

2.5. Device Characterization

3. Results

3.1. Electrical Characteristics of High-k Gate Dielectric Engineered SiNW Channel DG FETs

3.2. Self-Amplification Capabilities of High-k Gate Dielectric Engineered DG FETs

3.3. pH Sensing Characteristics of High-k Gate Dielectric Engineered SiNW Channel DG FETs

3.4. Ca²⁺-Selective Sensing Characteristics of the High-k Gate Dielectric Engineered SiNW Channel DG FETs

4. Conclusions

Author Contributions

Funding

Institutional Review Board Statement

Informed Consent Statement

Data Availability Statement

Acknowledgments

Conflicts of Interest

References

Share and Cite

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

Further Information

Guidelines

MDPI Initiatives

Follow MDPI

Article Menu

Pushing the Limits of Biosensing: Selective Calcium Ion Detection with High Sensitivity via High-k Gate Dielectric Engineered Si Nanowire Random Network Channel Dual-Gate Field-Effect Transistors

Abstract

1. Introduction

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

2.2. Formation of SiNW Random Network Channel via the Template Transfer Method

2.3. Fabrication of the SiNW DG FET Transducer Unit

2.4. Fabrication of Ca2+-Selective EG Sensing Unit

2.5. Device Characterization

3. Results

3.1. Electrical Characteristics of High-k Gate Dielectric Engineered SiNW Channel DG FETs

3.2. Self-Amplification Capabilities of High-k Gate Dielectric Engineered DG FETs

3.3. pH Sensing Characteristics of High-k Gate Dielectric Engineered SiNW Channel DG FETs

3.4. Ca2+-Selective Sensing Characteristics of the High-k Gate Dielectric Engineered SiNW Channel DG FETs

4. Conclusions

Author Contributions

Funding

Institutional Review Board Statement

Informed Consent Statement

Data Availability Statement

Acknowledgments

Conflicts of Interest

References

Share and Cite

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

Further Information

Guidelines

MDPI Initiatives

Follow MDPI

2.4. Fabrication of Ca²⁺-Selective EG Sensing Unit

3.4. Ca²⁺-Selective Sensing Characteristics of the High-k Gate Dielectric Engineered SiNW Channel DG FETs