Erratum: Cavender-Bares, J.; Meireles, J.E.; Couture, J.; Kaproth, M.A.; Kingdon, C.C; Singh, A; Serbin, S.P.; Center, A; Zuniga, E; Pilz, G; Townsend, P.A. Associations of Leaf Spectra with Genetic and Phylogenetic Variation in Oaks: Prospects for Remote Detection of Biodiversity. Remote Sens. 2016, 8, 221
<p>(<b>A</b>) Bivariate plot of population means (±1 SE) from a principal coordinates (PCO) analysis PCO using leaf spectra from five populations of <span class="html-italic">Quercus oleoides</span> (BZ = Belize, MX = Mexico, HN = Honduras, CR-SE = Costa Rica, Santa Elena, and CR-RI = Costa Rica, Rincon), showing the first and second axes of variation. The first two components were significantly differentiated by population (see Table S2); (<b>B</b>) PCO scores showing population means (±1 SE) for the first and fourth principal components as black circles with 95% CI. These were the first two components that had significant phylogenetic signal (see Table S2); (<b>C</b>) PCO scores for the first and fourth principal components shown for the four higher order clades (live oaks, <span class="html-italic">Virentes</span> (<span class="html-italic">V</span>, green symbol); white oaks, section <span class="html-italic">Quercus</span> (<span class="html-italic">Q</span>, blue symbol), red oaks, section <span class="html-italic">Lobatae</span> (<span class="html-italic">L</span>, red symbol), and golden cup oaks, section <span class="html-italic">Protobalanus</span> (<span class="html-italic">P</span>, gold symbol); (<b>D</b>) PCO scores for leaf type (evergreen (E), deciduous (D) or brevi-deciduous (BD)), showing the first and fourth principle components, the first two components that were significantly differentiated by leaf type (see Table S3).</p> "> Figure 4
<p>(<b>A</b>) Molecular phylogeny of 28 oak species showing principal coordinate scores to the right of each species. Leaf habit is indicated by letter codes and coloring of species names, as follows: D = deciduous (red), E = evergreen (dark green), and BD = brevi-deciduous or semi-evergreen (light green). The four recognized higher level clades are indicated with colored circles as follows: red, red oaks (section <span class="html-italic">Lobatae</span>); blue, white oaks (section <span class="html-italic">Quercus</span>); green, live oaks (<span class="html-italic">Virentes</span>); and yellow, golden cup oaks (<span class="html-italic">Protobalanus</span>). Species values for the first and fourth principal coordinate (PCO) axes are shown to the right: (<b>B</b>) PCO1 and PCO4. Positive PCO axis values are shown in dark gray, negative in light gray. Distributions of observed values of Blomberg’s K statistic (red dashed lines) are shown relative to a Brownian motion (BM) model of evolution (dark gray bars) and relative to a white noise model in which phylogenetic relationships are completely randomized (light gray bars) for (<b>C</b>) PCO1 (<b>left</b>) and PCO4 (<b>right</b>) species scores. Observed K values for the PCO1 and PCO4 scores are consistent with a Brownian motion model of evolution and show higher phylogenetic conservatism than expected based on random relationships.</p> ">
Reference
- Cavender-Bares, J.; Meireles, J.E.; Couture, J.; Kaproth, M.A.; Kingdon, C.C.; Singh, A.; Serbin, S.P.; Center, A.; Zuniga, E.; Pilz, G.; et al. Associations of leaf spectra with genetic and phylogenetic variation in Oaks: Prospects for remote detection of biodiversity. Remote Sens. 2016, 8, 221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
© 2016 by the author; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Remote Sensing Editorial Office. Erratum: Cavender-Bares, J.; Meireles, J.E.; Couture, J.; Kaproth, M.A.; Kingdon, C.C; Singh, A; Serbin, S.P.; Center, A; Zuniga, E; Pilz, G; Townsend, P.A. Associations of Leaf Spectra with Genetic and Phylogenetic Variation in Oaks: Prospects for Remote Detection of Biodiversity. Remote Sens. 2016, 8, 221. Remote Sens. 2016, 8, 475. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs8060475
Remote Sensing Editorial Office. Erratum: Cavender-Bares, J.; Meireles, J.E.; Couture, J.; Kaproth, M.A.; Kingdon, C.C; Singh, A; Serbin, S.P.; Center, A; Zuniga, E; Pilz, G; Townsend, P.A. Associations of Leaf Spectra with Genetic and Phylogenetic Variation in Oaks: Prospects for Remote Detection of Biodiversity. Remote Sens. 2016, 8, 221. Remote Sensing. 2016; 8(6):475. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs8060475
Chicago/Turabian StyleRemote Sensing Editorial Office. 2016. "Erratum: Cavender-Bares, J.; Meireles, J.E.; Couture, J.; Kaproth, M.A.; Kingdon, C.C; Singh, A; Serbin, S.P.; Center, A; Zuniga, E; Pilz, G; Townsend, P.A. Associations of Leaf Spectra with Genetic and Phylogenetic Variation in Oaks: Prospects for Remote Detection of Biodiversity. Remote Sens. 2016, 8, 221" Remote Sensing 8, no. 6: 475. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs8060475