1. Introduction and Preliminaries
In 1922, Banach [
1] demonstrated a significant conclusion for fixed point theory on the metric spaces, known as the Banach contraction principle. Because of its applications in various fields of nonlinear analysis and applied mathematical analysis, this principle has been generalized and extended in different ways.
One of the interesting and famous generalizations was proved by Nadler [
2] by applying the concept of the Pompeiu–Hausdorff metric defined on a family of closed and bounded subsets of a complete metric space (see [
3]). He established the concept of multi-valued contraction mappings.
Throughout this paper, the standard notations and terminologies in nonlinear analysis (see [
4,
5]) are used. For the convenience of the reader, we recall some of them.
Let be a metric space. Let and be the class of all nonempty closed and bounded (compact) subsets of X, respectively.
The symmetric functional
defined by
where
, for all
is a metric called the Pompeiu–Hausdorff metric.
Nadler had proved the following fixed point theorem for multivalued mappings satisfying a symmetric contraction condition.
Theorem 1 ([
2]).
Let be a complete metric space and be a multi-valued contraction mapping satisfyingfor all where k is a constant such that Then, T has a fixed point; that is, there exist a point such that Later, several interesting fixed point theorem for multi-valued mappings were obtained (see [
4,
5,
6,
7,
8,
9,
10,
11,
12,
13] and especially the monographs of Rus [
14,
15,
16]).
Let be a given mapping. For any fixed in a sequence in X such that is called a T-orbital sequence around The set denotes the collection of all such sequences. Further, an element is called a fixed point of if The set of all fixed points of a multi-valued T is denoted by that is, A multi-valued mapping is called a Lipschitzian mapping if, for all there exists some such that holds. If we take in the previous inequality, then the Lipschitzian mapping T is called nonexpansive.
The following data dependence problem is well known.
Let be two multi-valued mappings such that and are nonempty and there exists with the property that , for all
Under these conditions, estimate
where
is the power set of
Several partial answers to this problem are given in [
17,
18,
19].
The stability problems of functional equations originated from a question of Ulam [
20] concerning the stability of group homomorphisms. Hyers [
21] gave a partial answer to the question of Ulam [
20] for Banach spaces.
Let
be a metric space and
a multi-valued mapping. Consider the fixed point problem
Let
An element
is called an
-solution of the fixed point problem (2) if there exists
such that
The fixed point problem (2) is called Ulam–Hyers stable if there exists a finite constant
such that for each
and for each
-solution
of the fixed point problem (2) there exist solutions
of problem (2) such that
Following the authors of [
22,
23], a single-valued mapping
is called an enriched contraction or
-enriched contraction [
22] if there exist two constants,
and
such that, for all
,
and enriched nonexpansive or
b-enriched nonexpansive [
23] if
respectively.
Note that the above two contractive conditions are both symmetric. We state Theorem 2.4 of [
22] for convenience and in view of extending to the case of multi-valued mappings.
Theorem 2 ([
22]).
Let be a Banach space and be a -enriched contraction. Then,- 1.
T has a unique fixed point .
- 2.
There exist such that the iterative method , given by converges to p for any
- 3.
The following estimate holds where
As shown in [
22], a lot of well-known contractive conditions from the literature imply the
-enriched contraction. Therefore, Theorem 2 includes as particular cases the Banach contraction principle and several important fixed point theorems in the literature.
The purpose of this paper is to extend the concept of enriched contraction and enriched nonexpansive from the case of single-valued mappings to multi-valued mappings, which not only includes the class of multi-valued contraction mappings but also the class of some Lipschitzian mappings as a subclass. We study a data dependence problem of the fixed point sets and Ulam–Hyers stability of the fixed point problem for enriched multi-valued mappings. We present applications of our results in establishing the existence of a solution of a differential inclusion problem, dynamic programming; introduce a algorithm in real Hilbert space; prove a strong convergence theorem for approximating a common solution of fixed point inclusion for enriched multi-valued nonexpansive mapping and equilibrium problem of a bifunction.
2. Main Results
We introduce now the notions of enriched multi-valued contraction and enriched multi-valued nonexpansive mapping by means of the following two symmetric contractive type inequalities.
Definition 1. Let be a linear normed space. A multi-valued mapping is called:
- (i)
Enriched multi-valued contraction if there exists and such that - (ii)
Enriched multi-valued nonexpansive if for all we have
To indicate the constant involved in (6) and (7), we also call T a -enriched multi-valued contraction and b-enriched multi-valued nonexpansive, respectively.
Example 1. Any multi-valued contraction (1) mapping T with contraction constant L is -enriched multi-valued contraction, i.e., T satisfies (6) with and
Every multi-valued nonexpansive mapping T is 0-enriched multi-valued nonexpansive.
Example 2. Let be a finite measure space. The classical Lebesgue space is defined as the collection of all Borel measurable functions such that We know that the space X equipped with the norm is a Banach space. Define the mapping bywhere Clearly, as Note that T is an -enriched multi-valued contraction mapping but not a contraction mapping in the sense of Nadler [
2].
Indeed, if we take such that and then clearly, On the other hand,where is the zero measurable function on Y. Clearly, we haveandwhich gives that Similarly, Thus, Hence, T is -enriched multi-valued contraction. In addition, Remark 1. Let M be a convex subset of a linear space X and Then, for any consider the mapping given by In other words, for each x in is the translation of the set by the vector Clearly, Indeed, if , then On the other hand, if then for some we have which further implies that
We need the following Lemma of Nadler [
2] (see also [
7] ).
Lemma 1 ([
7]).
Let be a metric space, and Then, for each , there exists such that We now prove the following fixed point theorem for a -enriched multi-valued contraction in normed space. In the sequel, the letters and denote the set of all real numbers and the set of all natural numbers, respectively.
Theorem 3. Let be a normed space, a -enriched multi-valued contraction. Then,
- 1.
- 2.
There exist a -orbital sequence around that converges to the fixed point of for which the following estimates hold:
provided that for some in the -orbital subset is a complete subset of X where for certain and
Proof. We divide the proof into the following two cases.
Case 1. Suppose that
Take
Clearly,
In this case, we have
and hence
Equivalently, for each
we have
where
and
is defined as in (14). As
so
and hence the mapping
is a
c contraction in the sense of Nadler [
2].
Let , and If then implies that and hence
Suppose that
. Then, by Lemma 1, there exists
such that
We may take
such that
and hence
If
Then,
gives that
Suppose that
. Following the arguments similar to those given above, there exists
such that
Continuing this way, we can obtain a sequence
in
X such that
and it satisfies
By (19), we inductively obtain that
and
By (20), and triangular inequality, we have
for all
Hence,
which, in view of
gives that
is a Cauchy sequence in the subspace
of
X. Next, we assume that there exists an element
in
such that
Note that
On taking the limit as we get that Since is closed,
Case 2.
In this case, the enriched multi-valued contraction (6) becomes,
where
That is,
T is a multi-valued contraction mapping in the sense of Nadler and hence
by Nadler’s fixed point theorem.
To obtain (16), we let
in (22). By (21), we get similarly to (3.10)
and letting
in (25) we obtain (17). □
Example 3. Let be endowed with the usual norm and let be defined by for all Then, clearly T is a -enriched multi-valued contraction. As , this gives Let be fixed in Then, we have Pick in Similarly, in this way, we get Pick Continuing in this same way, we obtain where we obtain a Cauchy sequence which converges to 0 and 0 is the fixed point of
We now prove the following fixed point theorem for a -enriched multi-valued contraction in a Banach space.
Corollary 1. Let be a Banach space and a -enriched multi-valued contraction. Then,
Proof. Following arguments similar to those in the proof of Theorem 3, the result follows. □
As a corollary of our result, we can obtain Nadler’s fixed point theorem for multi-valued mappings, in the setting of a Banach space.
Corollary 2 ([
2]).
Let be a Banach space and a multi-valued contraction, that is,Then,
If in Corollary 1 for
T we take a single valued mapping, then we obtain Theorem
of [
22].
Corollary 3. Let be a Banach space and a -enriched contraction, that is, Then, T has a unique fixed point.
We now prove the following fixed point theorem for b-enriched multi-valued nonexpansive mappings in a uniformly convex Banach space.
Theorem 4. Let X be a uniformly convex Banach space and D a closed convex bounded nonempty subset of Let be a b enriched multi-valued nonexpansive mapping. Then, T has a fixed point, i.e., there exists with
Proof. We divide the proof into the following two cases.
Case 1. Suppose that
Clearly,
In this case, an
b-enriched multi-valued nonexpansive condition (7) reduces to the following form
Clearly,
satisfies all the conditions of Theorem 1 of [
24]. Hence
Case 2. Suppose that In this case, we have
Then,
by Theorem 1 of [
24]. □
As a corollary of our result, we can obtain Theorem 1 of [
24] for multi-valued mappings.
Corollary 4 ([
24]).
Let X be a uniformly convex Banach space and let D be a closed convex bounded nonempty subset of Let be a 0
-enriched multi-valued nonexpansive mapping. Then, T has a fixed point, i.e., there exists with 3. Approximation Methods for Enriched Multi-Valued Nonexpansive Nonself Mappings and Equilibrium Problems
Let
H be a real Hilbert space with inner product
Let
D be a nonempty and convex subset of
H and let
be a bifunction. The equilibrium problem for
F is to find
such that
The solutions set of (26) is denoted by
The equilibrium problem (26) includes as special cases numerous problems in physics, optimization, and economics. Some methods have been continuously constructed for solving the equilibrium problem (see, for example, Refs. [
25,
26] and references therein). Let
X be a Banach space and
D a subset of
A multi-valued mapping
is said to satisfy the condition (A), if
for all
and
When
is a sequence in
H,
implies that
converges weakly to
x and
means the strong convergence. In a real Hilbert space
H, we have
for all
and
Let
D be a closed and convex subset of
For every point
there exists a unique nearest point in
denoted by
such that
is called the metric projection of H onto
For solving the equilibrium problem for a bifunction let us assume that F satisfies the following conditions:
- (A1)
for all
- (A2)
F is monotone, i.e., ,
- (A3)
- (A4)
For each is convex and lower semicontinuous.
The following is used for the proof if our main results in the sequel.
Lemma 2 ([
27]).
Let be a sequence of nonnegative real numbers, be a sequence in with be the sequence of nonnegative real numbers with and be the sequence of real numbers with Suppose thatfor all Then, Lemma 3 ([
27]).
Let D be a closed and convex subset of a real Hilbert space H and be the metric projection from H onto Given and if and only if Lemma 4 ([
27]).
For define the mapping as follows:Then, the following hold:
- 1.
is single-value.
- 2.
is firmly nonexpansive, i.e., for any - 3.
- 4.
is closed and convex.
Lemma 5. Let D be a closed and convex subset of Hilbert space H. Let be a b-enriched multi-valued nonexpansive mapping with and for each . Then, is a closed and convex subset of D.
Proof. We divide the proof into the following two cases.
Case 1. Suppose that
Clearly,
In this case, a
b-enriched multi-valued nonexpansive condition (7) reduces to the following form
First, we show that
is closed. Let
be sequence in
such that
as
We have
It follows that
, so
Next, we show that
is convex. Let
where
and
Let
we have
Hence, Therefore,
Case 2. Suppose that
In this case, we have
Then,
is a closed and convex subset of
D by Lemma
of [
27]. □
Using the above results, we study convergence of the following iteration (27). Let D be a nonempty, closed, and convex subset of a Hilbert space H. Let be a multi-valued nonself mapping, a contraction, and a bifunction. Let be a sequence in and a sequence in For a given we compute
such that,
then we let
for some
and define
by
We next compute
such that,
From Nadler’s Theorem (see [
2]), it follows that there exists
such that
Inductively, we construct the sequence
as follows:
Here, is such that for
Now, we prove a strong convergence theorem of the iteration (27) to find the common element of the solutions set of an equilibrium problem and the fixed points set of a multi-valued nonself mapping.
Theorem 5. Let D be a nonempty, closed, and convex subset of a Hilbert space Let F be a bifunction from to satisfying (A1)-(A4) and T a b-enriched multi-valued nonexpansive mapping of D into such that Let f be a contraction of H into itself. Let and be sequence satisfied the following conditions:
- (i)
and
- (ii)
and
If satisfies Condition then the sequence and generated by (27) converges to where and
Proof. Take
then, the
b-enriched multi-valued nonexpansive condition (7) reduces to the following form
Using Lemmas 4 and 5, we define
Since
f is a contraction, there exists a constant
such that
for all
Hence,
is a contraction of
H into itself. Thus, there exists a unique element
such that
We next divide the proof into five steps.
Step 1. Show that is bounded.
Let
Then,
, and we have
for all
It follows from (28) that
Hence, is bounded, and so are the sequences and
Step 2. Show that as
From the definition of
there exist
and
such that
Put
Then, we have
On the other hand, from
and
we have
for all
and
for all
Setting
in (30) and
in (31), we have
and
It follows from (A2) that
and hence
Without loss of generality, let us assume that there exists a real number
such that
for all
Then, we have
and hence
where
Combining (29) and (32), we obtain
By Conditions (i) and (ii), we have as using Lemma 2.
Step 3. Show that
Using (32) and (ii), we have
Since
Since
as
and, by Step 1, the sequence
is bounded, we see
as
This implies that
as
For
we have
which yields
Therefore, from the convexity of
we have
and hence
It follows from (i) and
that
From (34) and (35), it follows that
Step 4. Show that where
Firstly, we choose a subsequence
of
such that
and
From
we obtain
Let us show
From
we have
Since
and
from (A4), we have
for all
For
t with
and
let
Since
and
Hence,
Thus, from (A1) and (A4), we get
and hence
Thus,
for all
by (A3) and hence
Since
and
is demiclosed at
we obtain that
Therefore,
Since
by Lemma 3,
Step 5. Show that as
From the equality
we readily infer
Put It follows from (i) and (37) that Thus, by Lemma 2. This concludes that converges strongly to We can easily check that also converges to We thus complete the proof. □
Remark 2. If in Theorem 5 for T we take a single valued mapping and then we obtain Theorem 3.2 of [
26].
4. Data Dependence and Uniform Convergence of Fixed Point Sets in Banach Spaces
We now present the following data dependence result for enriched multi-valued mappings.
Theorem 6. Let be a Banach space and be multi-valued mappings. Assume that
- 1.
S is a -enriched multi-valued contraction.
- 2.
T is a -enriched multi-valued contraction.
- 3.
There exists such that
Then,
Moreover,where and Proof. It follows from (1) that and As S and T are - and -enriched multi-valued contractions, respectively, by Corollary 1, and
Let
be such that
as
that is,
Using (18), we have
On taking limit as
we obtain
Hence,
is closed. Similarly, the set
is closed. To prove the remaining part of the theorem, let
Then, for an arbitrary
there exists
such that
As
there exists
such that
We take
such that
Following arguments similar to those given in the proof of Theorem 1, we get
for any
On taking limit as
we obtain that
is a Cauchy sequence in
X. Since
X is a Banach space, we have
for some
in
In addition,
By (39), we obtain that
In particular, we get
where
Similarly, for each
there is an
such that
where
By (40) and (41), we obtain that
Letting in the previous inequality, we get the conclusion. □
Theorem 7. Let be a Banach space and a sequence of -enriched multi-valued mappings, for If the sequence converges to uniformly on then Proof. As
converges to
uniformly on
for an arbitrary
, there exists
such that
If we set
then
for all
and
Then, by Theorem 6, we have
□
Theorem 8. Let be a Banach space. Suppose that all the hypotheses of Corollary 1 hold. Then, the fixed point problem (2) is Ulam–Hyers stable.
Proof. From Remark 1, it follows that the fixed point problem (2) is equivalent to the fixed point problem
Let
be an
-solution of (42). Hence, we see that
Using (18) and 43, we get
where
. Since
, this gives
□
5. Application to Differential Inclusions
In this section, as an application of the result proven in the above section, we prove the existence of solutions to the problem of differential inclusions. Before that, recall the following concept. Let
I be the interval in the real line
. A function
is absolutely continuous on
I if, for every positive number
there is a positive number
such that, whenever a finite sequence of pairwise disjoint sub-intervals
of
I with
satisfies
Let and The space of all real valued continuous (absolutely continuous) functions on K equipped with supremum norm is denoted by ().
We consider the following time dependent differential inclusion problem: find
x in
such that
where
is a given multi-valued mapping satisfying certain conditions.
Next, we prove the existence of the solution to the differential inclusion problem (44). Denote by
the set of Lebesgue integrable selections of
i.e.,
Definition 2. A function is said to be the solution of the problem (44), if there exists such that Theorem 9. Suppose that the following conditions are satisfied:
- 1.
- 2.
For every fixed and for any sequence in there exists a subsequence of such that converges to a function as for almost every and - 3.
is closed for all
- 4.
For each fixed , is bounded on
- 5.
There exists with and for all we havewhere , .
Then, problem (44) has a solution.
Proof. Let
. Define the multi-valued mapping
T on
X by
As is nonempty for each , the multi-valued mapping T is well defined.
If
then
gives that
Thus, the differential inclusion problem (44) is equivalent to the following inclusion:
We now show that the multi-valued mapping T satisfies all the conditions of Corollary 1.
Clearly,
is nonempty for each
. First, we prove that
is a closed subset of
For this, let
be fixed and
a sequence in
such that
as
Then, there exists a sequence
in
such that
By the given hypotheses, there exists a subsequence
of
such that
converges to a function
as
for almost every
and
As
is closed for all
for almost every
and hence
Note that
Thus,
Moreover, for a fixed
,
is bounded on
In addition, there exists
such that
for almost every
and every
Indeed,
, for almost every
Hence, for all
we have
Therefore, T has bounded values in Thus,
We now show that
T is an enriched multi-valued contraction. For this, let
be fixed. Let us denote
and
for fixed
x and
y in
We know that
where
By using the values of
and
we get
for some
By using (45) in the above inequality, we obtain that
From (48) and (47), we have
Similarly, we obtain that
Using (49) and (50) in (46), we have
Let
Since
we get
and so (51) becomes
Thus, all the conditions of Corollary 1 are satisfied, and hence we deduce the existence of a solution of (44). □
Example 4. Consider the problemwhere We check that all the conditions of Theorem 9 are satisfied. Indeed,
- 1.
since is a Lebesgue integrable selection of
- 2.
For fixed and for any sequence in we have, for every that except possibly for t at a set of measure zero, converges at almost every point towards the function given by as , and, for every we have - 3.
It is clear that is closed for all
- 4.
For fixed, is bounded on
- 5.
If we take then for every and for all we have for all , .
By Theorem 9, there exists a solution to the differential inclusion problem (52). Indeed, is the solution of the differential inclusion (52).
6. An Application to Dynamic Programming
Dynamic Programming has attracted the attention of several researchers due to its broad applicability in various disciplines of physical and social sciences. The origin of the theory of dynamic programming lies in multi-stage decision processes. In such processes, certain functional equations emerge in a usual fashion.
This section deals with functional equations that occur in some kinds of continuous multi-stage decision-making processes. We define below the continuous multi-stage decision-making mechanism as follows.
Let
be the state space and
the decision space, where
X and
Y are Banach spaces. We denote a state vector by
x and a decision vector by
Let
, and
be the given mappings, where
is the field of real numbers. The return function
of the continuous decision process is defined by the functional equation.
For more results in this direction, we refer to the works in [
28,
29,
30].
Let be the space of bounded real-valued functions on
Theorem 10. Let the notation be as just above and suppose that the following conditions are satisfied:
- 1.
G and g are bounded.
- 2.
for all and where and
Then, functional Equation (53) possesses a unique bounded solution on
Proof. We know that
equipped with the norm
is a Banach space. Define the operator
T on
by
where
Since G and g are bounded, Moreover, the problem of finding any bounded solution of functional Equation (53) is equivalent to finding a fixed point of T.
Let
and
Then, for
we have
Let
be fixed real number. Choose
,
and
such that
From (54) and (57), we have
Hence,
where
Since
Similarly, it follows from (55) and (56) that
Finally, by (58) and (59), we have
Thus, all the conditions of Corollary 3 are satisfied, and hence the functional Equation (53) possesses a unique bounded solution. □
7. Conclusions
We introduce the classes of enriched multi-valued contractions and enriched multi-valued nonexpansive contractions that include multi-valued contractions as a particular case, as well as some multi-valued nonexpansive and Lipschitzian mappings. For other related results, we refer to the works in [
31,
32,
33,
34,
35,
36,
37,
38,
39,
40,
41,
42].
We present examples to show that the class of enriched multi-valued contractions strictly includes the multi-valued contractions in the sense that there exist mappings which are not multi-valued contractions and belong to the class of enriched multi-valued contractions.
We show that every enriched multi-valued contraction has a fixed point (Theorem 3). In particular, by the fixed point results established in this paper, we obtain the Nadler’s fixed point theorem (Corollary 2) in the setting of a Banach space.
We obtain Corollary 1, which extends the fixed point theorem (Theorem 2.4, [
22]) from the class of enriched single-valued contraction to enriched multi-valued contractions.
We show that every enriched multi-valued nonexpansive contraction has a fixed point (Theorem 4), and we provide an algorithm to estimate the common solution of the equilibrium problem and the enriched multi-valued nonexpansive one (Theorem 5).
We also obtain Theorems 6 and 8 for a data dependence problem of the fixed point sets and Ulam–Hyers stability of the fixed point problem for enriched multi-valued mappings, respectively.
As an application of our results (Corollaries 1 and 3), the existence of the solution to the problem of differential inclusions (Theorem 9) and the application to dynamic programming (Theorem 10) are presented.