Best Practices for Teaching Chemistry Disciplines to Graduates Majoring in Pharmacy During the COVID-19 Restrictions: A Systematic Review
Iryna V. Nizhenkovska , Tatiana D. Reva , Oksana M. Chkhalo , Iryna O. But , Oksana V. Manchenko
The purpose of the study was to identify the - interventions that can be adopted for teaching chemistry disciplines to the graduates majoring in Pharm.
- Pub. date: November 15, 2022
- Pages: 769-781
- 382 Downloads
- 1045 Views
- 4 Citations
The purpose of the study was to identify the - interventions that can be adopted for teaching chemistry disciplines to the graduates majoring in Pharmacy (Mpharm) in Ukraine. The study employed a systematic review methodology and a qualitative approach to synthesising the sources. The triangular assessment method was used to rate the short-listed instructional interventions for feasibility, transferability, and duplicability in the settings of teaching chemistry disciplines to pharmacy graduates in Ukraine. The review found seven eligible publications for the analysis. It was identified that the shortlisted instructional models were technology-mediated and positively affected students’ skills and occupational knowledge. Three out of seven instructional models used chatbots and AI to automate the process of management of students learning activity which suggested that automation of the process of educational content delivery was becoming an emerging trend in instructional design. Having performed the triangular assessment method (TAM) analysis, three instructional models were given preference in terms of their use in medical education settings in Ukraine. These models were as follows: a) PhET simulations-based model, b) the model based on automated delivery of the course using the Smart Sender platform and c) the model based on automation of the Moodle-driven e-course using Dialogflow chatbot.
Keywords: Pharmacy graduates, higher education, systematic review, teaching chemistry disciplines.
References
Aliakbari, F., Parvin, N., Heidari, M., & Haghani, F. (2015). Learning theories application in nursing education. Journal of Education and Health Promotion, 4(2), 3-11.
Arab, M., Ghavami, B., Akbari Lakeh, M., Yaghmaie, M., & Hosseini-Zijoud, S. M. (2015). Learning theory: Narrative review. International Journal of Medical Reviews, 2(3), 291-295. http://bitly.ws/vXE7
Bobrytska, V. I., Reva, T. D., Beseda, N. A., & Filippova, L. V. (2020). Approaches to cultivating healthy behaviours in tertiary students: Systemic review. European Journal of Educational Research, 9(4), 1649-1653. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.9.4.1649
Bobrytska, V. I., Reva, T. D., Protska, S. M., & Chkhalo, O. M. (2020). Effectiveness and stakeholders’ perceptions of the integration of automated e-learning courses into vocational education programmes in universities in Ukraine. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 19(5), 27-46. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.19.5.3
de Vries, L. E., & May, M. (2019). Virtual laboratory simulation in the education of laboratory technicians–motivation and study intensity. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 47(23), 257-262. https://doi.org/10.1002/bmb.21221
Díez-Pascual, A. M., & Jurado-Sánchez, B. (2022). Remote teaching of Chemistry laboratory courses during COVID-19. Journal of Chemical Education, 99, 1913−1922. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.2c00022
Djordjevic, V. (2014). Literature review of teaching strategies for college-level chemistry. DePaul University. http://bitly.ws/vfXf
Greenhalgh, T., Robert, G., Bate, P., Macfarlane, F., & Kyriakidou, O. (2005). Critical appraisal checklists: Appendix 2. In T. Greenhalgh, G. Robert, P. Bate, F. Macfarlane & O. Kyriakidou (Eds.), Diffusion of innovations in health service organisations: A systematic literature review (pp. 234-244). Blackwell Publishing Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470987407.app2
Islam, M. A., & Schweiger, T. A. (2015). Students' perception of an integrated approach to teaching entire sequence of medicinal chemistry, pharmacology, and pharmacotherapeutics courses in PharmD curriculum. Journal of Pharmacy Practice, 28(2), 220–226. https://doi.org/10.1177/0897190014544821
Joanna Briggs Institute. (2020). Checklist for qualitative research: Critical Appraisal tools for use in JBI Systematic Reviews. JBI Global. http://bitly.ws/t3Em
Kelley, G., & Kelley, K. (2019). Systematic reviews and meta-analysis in nutrition research. British Journal of Nutrition, 122(11), 1279-1294. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007114519002241
Koenig, J. (2019). Why you need A-level chemistry to study medicine. Royal Society of Chemistry. http://bitly.ws/sMoB
Kugley, S., Wade, A., Thomas, J., Mahood, Q., Klint Jørgensen, A. M., Hammerstrøm, K., & Sathe, N. (2015). Searching for studies: A guide to information retrieval for Campbell systematic reviews. The Campbell Collaboration. http://bitly.ws/v9pc
Kuklinova, T. (2017). Podalʹsha diyalʹnistʹ universytetiv, yaki pryymayutʹ uchastʹ u proekti Tyuninh [Follow-up of universities, participating in the tuning project]. In O.V. Prokopenko (Ed.), Problemy ta shlyakhy zabezpechennya yakosti ekonomichnoyi osvity v umovakh yevro intehratsiyi: Materialy naukovo-metodychnoyi konferentsiyi [Problems and ways of ensuring the quality of economic education in the settings of European integration: Scientific and methodology conference] (pp.129-132). Electronic Odessa National Economic University Institutional Repository. https://cutt.ly/VNc9bLT
Kyrylenko, S. (2018). Medical education in the European Union: Challenges for Ukraine. Jean Monnet Project. http://bitly.ws/sSCG
Lapitan, L. Jr., Tiangco, C. E., Sumalinog, D., Sabarillo, N. S., & Diaz, J. M. (2021). An effective blended online teaching and learning strategy during the COVID-19 pandemic. Education for Chemical Engineers, 35, 116–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ece.2021.01.012
Lee, T. (2016). Learning theories: Behaviorism, cognitivism, constructivism, and connectivism. Travis Lee. http://bitly.ws/sPUR
Lukashevska, A. (2021). Yak zminylasya osvita medykiv za chasy nezalezhnosti: Interv'yu z profesorom [How medical education has changed since independence: An interview with a professor]. TB Novyny Zdorovya24/Health News 24 TV. http://bitly.ws/v9r3
Lychuk, M., Bilous, N., Isaienko, S., Gritsyak, L., & Nozhovnik, O. (2021). Smart automated language teaching through the smart sender platform. European Journal of Educational Research, 10(2), 841-854. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.10.2.841
Lynch, M. (2018). Digital learning theories and models that all educators should know. The Tech Edvocate. http://bitly.ws/vfXa
McPherson, P. A. C. (2022). A medical need for chemistry. Natural Reviews Chemistry, 6, 297–298. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41570-022-00371-z
Melnyk, O. (2020). Vykorystannia suchasnykh tekhnichnykh zasobiv pry vevchenni khimichnykh dystsyplin farmatsevtam [Use of modern technology when teaching chemistry disciplines to pharmaceutical students]. Archive of Clinical Medicine/Arkhiv Klinichnoi Medytsyny, 26(2), 30-32. https://doi.org/10.21802/acm.2020.2.6
Moher, D., Shamseer, L., Clarke, M., Ghersi, D., Liberati, A., Petticrew, M., Shekelle, P., Stewart, L. A., & PRISMA-P Group (2015). Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Systematic Reviews, 4(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-4-1
Mukhalalati, B. A., & Taylor, A. (2019). Adult learning theories in context: A quick guide for healthcare professional educators. Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development, 6, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1177/2382120519840332
Nizhenkovska, I., Reva, T., Chkhalo, O., & Holovchenko, O. (2020). Technology-Driven Self-Directed Learning of Graduate Pharmaceutists: Adding Value through Entrepreneurship. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 19(6), 111-126. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.19.6.7
Nizhenkovska, I. V., Afanasenko, O. V., Glushachenko, O. O., & But, I. O. (2021). Navchalna Dystsyplina “Farmatsevtychna Khimiya”: Syllabus for Spetsialnosti 226 “Farmatsiya”, osvitnia kvalifikatsiaya “Mahistr z Farmatsii” [Academic Discipline “Pharmaceutical Chemistry: Syllabus for speciality 226 “Pharmacy”, educational qualification of “Master of Pharmacy”]. Bogomolets National Medical University/Natsionalnyi Medychnyi Universitet imeni О. Bohomoltsa. http://bitly.ws/sNkA
Noesgaard, S. S., & Ørngreen, R. (2015). The effectiveness of e-learning: An explorative and integrative review of the definitions, methodologies, and factors that promote e-learning effectiveness. The Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 13(4), 278-290. http://bitly.ws/t78C
Nozhovnik, O., Harbuza, T., Starosta, H., Radchenko, Y., & Zatserkovnyi, O. (2022). Best practices of fostering undergraduates’ cross-cultural competence involving training them in foreign languages: Systemic review. International Journal of Educational Methodology, 8(4), 655-668. https://doi.org/10.12973/ijem.8.4.655
Okrepka, H. (2020). Vykorystannia virtualnykh trenazheriv PHET–interactive simulations pry vykladanni zahalnoi khimii farmatsevtam u zakladkh vyshchoi osvity [Using of PhET–interactive simulation in teaching of general chemistry to pharmaceutical students in higher education establishment]. Educational Discourse/Osvitolohichniy Dyskurs, (3), 206–219. https://doi.org/10.28925/2312-5829.2020.3.12
Opara, M. F. (2013). Application of the learning theories in teaching Chemistry: Implication for global competitiveness. International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, 4(10), 1229-1243. http://bitly.ws/sTWc
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372(71), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
Perez-Rodriguez, F., & Rojo-Alboreca, A. (2017). The triangle assessment method: A new procedure for eliciting expert judgement. Expert Systems with Applications, 72, 139–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2016.11.021
Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2006). The content validity index: Are you sure you know what’s being reported? Critique and recommendations. Research in Nursing & Health, 29(5), 489–497. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.20147
Pushkarova, Y., Chkhalo, O., Reva, T., Zaitseva, G., & Bolotnikova, A. (2021). Using information technology in teaching of the course “Analytical Chemistry” in Bogomolets National Medical University. Archives of Pharmacy Practice, 12(3), 89-93. https://doi.org/10.51847/dvMCSbO1SE
Ross, M. T., & Cumming, A. D. (2008). The TUNING project (Medicine) - Learning outcomes/competences for undergraduate medical education in Europe. The University of Edinburgh. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.4620.7765
Salame, I. I., & Makki, J. (2021). Examining the use of PhET simulations on students’ attitudes and learning in General Chemistry II. Interdisciplinary Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 17(4), Article e2247. https://doi.org/10.21601/ijese/10966
Savluk, H., Dovbnia, S., Tsvietkova, H., Olefirenko, T., & Voityuk, I. (2022). Reshaping the preservice preschool teachers’ curriculum to give emphasis to the managerial domain. European Journal of Educational Research, 11(3), 1273-1287. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.11.3.1273
Seery, M. K. (2016). Harnessing technology in chemistry education. New Directions in the Teaching of Physical Sciences, 9(1), 77-86. https://doi.org/10.11120/ndir.2013.00002
Siddaway, A. P., Wood, A. M., & Hedges, L. V. (2019). How to do a systematic review: A best practice guide for conducting and reporting narrative reviews, meta-analyses, and meta-syntheses. Annual review of psychology, 70, 747–770. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-102803
Šojat, L., & Markic, S. (2015). Educational theories and how students learn Chemistry: Practice what you preach. In I. Maciejowska, & B. Byers (Eds.), Pre-service training for Chemistry teachers: A guidebook of good practice (pp. 11-26). Jagiellonian University in Krakow. http://bitly.ws/sTWN
Sullivan, J. (2022). 5 Benefits of Automation in Online Learning. Capacity. http://bitly.ws/t794
Taibu, R., Mataka, L., & Shekoyan, V. (2021). Using PhET simulations to improve scientific skills and attitudes of community college students. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science, and Technology, 9(3), 353-370. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijemst.1214
University of Maryland. (2022). Research guides: Systematic Review. Steps to conducting a systematic review. https://lib.guides.umd.edu/SR/steps
Yaremena, I. V., Holovchanska-Pushkar, S. E., Dereziuk, A. V., & Baidiuk, I. A. (2021). Suchasni perevahy, nedoliky ta perspektyvy rozvytku osvity v umovakh dystantsiynoho navchannya u zakladakh vyshchoyi medychnoyi osvity Ukrayiny [Modern Advantages, Disadvantages and Prospects for the Development of Education in the Context of Distance Learning in the Institutions of Higher Medical Education of Ukraine]. Ukrainian Journal of Medicine, Biology and Sports/Ukrayinsʹkyy Zhurnal Medytsyny, Biolohiyi ta Sportu, 6(6), 224-229. https://doi.org/10.26693/jmbs06.06.224