Rethinking the Design of Human-Data Interaction through a Study of Older Adults’ Wellbeing
Pages 266 - 279
Abstract
The pervasive presence of data in personal wellbeing technology highlights the need to understand how people perceive and interpret their data. Currently, health devices are marketed towards younger, active individuals, while technology for older people is focused on monitoring their frailty. Human-Data Interaction (HDI) suggests making data more legible and negotiable and highlighting people’s agency. However, most HDI initiatives are researcher/designer-led, and what their users make of their data is unclear. To understand how HDI manifests in everyday life, we engaged four older couples in 6-8 days of home trials of a clinical-grade smartwatch, diary studies, and co-design workshops. Our analysis revealed how data is collaboratively experienced, negotiated, and personalised, and how new embodied data representations can reshape experience. We contribute lessons from older adults’ perspectives and the approach of Data as Co-experience as a way to rethink designing data-driven systems based on how people interact with data — the way that data is generated, represented, experienced, shared, discussed, and understood.
Supplemental Material
MP4 File
Presentation video
- Download
- 238.84 MB
References
[1]
2022. Embracing Cosmologies: Expanding Worlds of Participatory Design. https://pdc2022.org/cfp/
[2]
Juan C. Aceros, Jeannette Pols, and Miquel Domènech. 2015. Where is grandma? Home telecare, good aging and the domestication of later life. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 93 (2015), 102–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2014.01.016
[3]
Aloha Hufana Ambe, Margot Brereton, Alessandro Soro, Laurie Buys, and Paul Roe. 2019. The Adventures of Older Authors: Exploring Futures through Co-Design Fictions. In 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems Proceedings (CHI 2019), May 4–9, 2019, Glasgow, Scotland, UK. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 16. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300588
[4]
Aloha Hufana Ambe, Margot Brereton, Alessandro Soro, and Paul Roe. 2017. Technology Individuation: The Foibles of Augmented Everyday Objects. In Proceedings of the ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 2017). 6632–6644. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025770
[5]
Aloha Hufana Ambe, Alessandro Soro, Daniel Johnson, and Margot Brereton. 2022. From Collaborative Habituation to Everyday Togetherness: A Long-Term Study of Use of the Messaging Kettle. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI) 29, 1 (2022), 1–47.
[6]
Saleema Amershi, Andrew Begel, Christian Bird, Robert DeLine, Harald Gall, Ece Kamar, Nachiappan Nagappan, Besmira Nushi, and Thomas Zimmermann. 2019. Software Engineering for Machine Learning: A Case Study. In Proceedings - 2019 IEEE/ACM 41st International Conference on Software Engineering: Software Engineering in Practice, ICSE-SEIP 2019. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSE-SEIP.2019.00042
[7]
Alissa N Antle, Allen Bevans, Josh Tanenbaum, Katie Seaborn, and Sijie Wang. 2011. Futura : Design for Collaborative Learning and Game Play on a Multi-touch Digital Tabletop. Proceedings of the fifth international conference on Tangible, embedded, and embodied interaction (2011), 93–100. https://doi.org/10.1145/1935701.1935721
[8]
Johanna Austin, Hiroko H. Dodge, Thomas Riley, Peter G. Jacobs, Stephen Thielke, and Jeffrey Kaye. 2016. A Smart-Home System to Unobtrusively and Continuously Assess Loneliness in Older Adults. IEEE Journal of Translational Engineering in Health and Medicine 4, April (2016). https://doi.org/10.1109/JTEHM.2016.2579638
[9]
Belén Barros Pena, Rachel E Clarke, Lars Erik Holmquist, and John Vines. 2021. Circumspect users: Older adults as critical adopters and resistors of technology. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–14.
[10]
Jesse Josua Benjamin, Arne Berger, Nick Merrill, and James Pierce. 2021. Machine learning uncertainty as a design material: A post-phenomenological inquiry. In Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445481 arxiv:2101.04035
[11]
Elizabeth A. Beverly and Linda A. Wray. 2010. The role of collective efficacy in exercise adherence: A qualitative study of spousal support and Type 2 diabetes management. Health Education Research (2010). https://doi.org/10.1093/her/cyn032
[12]
Alan F Blackwell. 2015. Interacting with an Inferred World: The Challenge of Machine Learning for Humane Computer Interaction. Aarhus Series on Human Centered Computing 1, 1 (2015), 12.
[13]
George Boateng, John A Batsis, Patrick Proctor, Ryan Halter, and David Kotz. 2018. GeriActive: Wearable app for monitoring and encouraging physical activity among older adults. In 2018 IEEE 15th International Conference on Wearable and Implantable Body Sensor Networks (BSN). IEEE, 46–49.
[14]
Alex Bowyer, Rob Wilson, Stuart Wheater, Matthew Snape, and Kyle Montague. 2019. Human-data interaction in the context of care: Co-designing family civic data interfaces and practices. In Extended Abstracts of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–6.
[15]
Karen L Boyd. 2021. Datasheets for Datasets help ML Engineers Notice and Understand Ethical Issues in Training Data. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 5, CSCW2 (2021), 1–27.
[16]
Barry Brown, Stuart Reeves, and Scott Sherwood. 2011. Into the Wild: Challenges and Opportunities for Field Trial Methods. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’11). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1657–1666. https://doi.org/10.1145/1978942.1979185
[17]
Barry Brown, Alex S. Taylor, Shahram Izadi, Abigail Sellen, Joseph Kaye, and Rachel Eardley. 2007. Locating Family Values: A Field Trial of the Whereabouts Clock. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing (UbiComp’07) 4717 (2007), 354–371. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74853-3
[18]
Leah Buechley and Hannah Perner-Wilson. 2012. Crafting Technology: Reimagining the Processes, Materials, and Cultures of Electronics. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 19, 3 (oct 2012), 21:1—-21:21. https://doi.org/10.1145/2362364.2362369
[19]
Francesco Cafaro. 2012. Using embodied allegories to design gesture suites for human-data interaction. In Proceedings of the 2012 ACM conference on ubiquitous computing. 560–563.
[20]
Adrienne S Chan. 2021. Storytelling, culture, and Indigenous methodology. In Discourses, dialogue and diversity in biographical research. Brill, 170–185.
[21]
Eun Kyoung Choe, Bongshin Lee, Haining Zhu, Nathalie Henry Riche, and Dominikus Baur. 2017. Understanding self-reflection: How people reflect on personal data through visual data exploration. In PervasiveHealth: Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare. https://doi.org/10.1145/3154862.3154881
[22]
Joshua Chuang, Lubaina Maimoon, Shuo Yu, Hongyi Zhu, Casper Nybroe, Owen Hsiao, Shu-hsing Li, Hsinmin Lu, and Hsinchun Chen. 2016. SilverLink: Smart Home Health Monitoring for Senior Care. In International Conference on Smart Health ’15, Vol. 9545. 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29175-8
[23]
Andy Crabtree and Richard Mortier. 2015. Human Data Interaction: Historical Lessons from Social Studies and CSCW. In ECSCW 2015: Proceedings of the 14th European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 19-23 September 2015, Oslo, Norway. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20499-4_1
[24]
Audrey Desjardins and Ron Wakkary. 2013. Manifestations of Everyday Design : Guiding Goals and Motivations. Creativity & Cognition (2013). https://doi.org/10.1145/2466627.2466643
[25]
Ed Diener. 1984. Subjective Well-Being. Psychological Bulletin 95, 3 (1984), 542–575.
[26]
Paul Dourish and Edgar Gómez Cruz. 2018. Datafication and data fiction: Narrating data and narrating with data. Big Data and Society (2018). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951718784083
[27]
J Doyle, N Caprani, and R Bond. 2015. Older adults’ attitudes to self-management of health and wellness through smart home data. In 9th International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare (PervasiveHealth), 2015. 129–136. https://doi.org/10.4108/icst.pervasivehealth.2015.259279
[28]
Jeannette Durick, Toni Robertson, Margot Brereton, Frank Vetere, and Bjorn Nansen. 2013. Dispelling ageing myths in technology design. Proceedings of the 25th Australian Computer-Human Interaction Conference on Augmentation, Application, Innovation, Collaboration - OzCHI ’13 (2013), 467–476. https://doi.org/10.1145/2541016.2541040
[29]
Niklas Elmqvist. 2011. Embodied Human-Data Interaction. In CHI 2011 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems.
[30]
Daniel A. Epstein, Clara Caldeira, Mayara Costa Figueiredo, Xi Lu, Lucas M. Silva, Lucretia Williams, Jong Ho Lee, Qingyang Li, Simran Ahuja, Qiuer Chen, Payam Dowlatyari, Craig Hilby, Sazeda Sultana, Elizabeth V. Eikey, and Yunan Chen. 2020. Mapping and Taking Stock of the Personal Informatics Literature. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies (2020). https://doi.org/10.1145/3432231
[31]
Melanie Feinberg. 2017. A design perspective on data. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 2952–2963.
[32]
Rebecca Fiebrink and Marco Gillies. 2018. Introduction to the Special Issue on Human-Centered Machine Learning. ACM Trans. Interact. Intell. Syst. 8, 2 (jun 2018), 7:1—-7:7. https://doi.org/10.1145/3205942
[33]
Joel E. Fischer, Andy Crabtree, Tom Rodden, James A. Colley, Enrico Costanza, Michael O. Jewell, and Sarvapali D. Ramchurn. 2016. "Just whack it on until it gets hot". In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI ’16. ACM Press, New York, 5933–5944. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858518
[34]
Batya Friedman. 1996. Value-sensitive design. Interactions (1996). https://doi.org/10.1145/242485.242493
[35]
Timnit Gebru, Jamie Morgenstern, Briana Vecchione, Jennifer Wortman Vaughan, Hanna M Wallach, Hal Daumé III, and Kate Crawford. 2018. Datasheets for Datasets. CoRR abs/1803.0 (2018). http://arxiv.org/abs/1803.09010
[36]
Daniel López Gómez. 2015. Little arrangements that matter. Rethinking autonomy-enabling innovations for later life. Technological Forecasting & Social Change 93 (2015), 91–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2014.02.015
[37]
Max Albert Holdsworth. 2019. Health, Wellness and Wellbeing. Interventions économiques (2019). https://doi.org/10.4000/interventionseconomiques.6322
[38]
Mohammad Hossein Jarrahi. 2022. Personal Informatics as an Information Ecology: Activity Trackers and Relational Affordances. International Journal of Knowledge Content Development & Technology 12, 1 (2022), 7.
[39]
Kerk F Kee, Larry D Browning, and Dawna I Ballard. 2012. Sociomaterial Processes, Long Term Planning, and Infrastructure Funding: Towards Effective Collaboration and Collaboration Tools for Visual and Data Analytics. (2012).
[40]
Medhi Khallouk, Tabitha Lucas, and Dianne Gardiner. 2018. Healthy ageing: developmental research report. Technical Report. 79 pages. https://www.health.gov.au/sites/default/files/healthy-ageing-developmental-research-report_0.pdf
[41]
Sara Klöber, Diana Löffler, Marc Hassenzahl, Ilona Nord, and Jörn Hurtienne. 2020. Designing ritual artifacts for technology-mediated relationship transitions. In TEI 2020 - Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction. https://doi.org/10.1145/3374920.3374937
[42]
Ian Li, Yevgeniy Medynskiy, Jon Froehlich, and Jakob Larsen. 2012. Personal informatics in practice: Improving quality of life through data. In Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.1145/2212776.2212724
[43]
MABEL L S LIE, STEPHEN LINDSAY, and KATIE BRITTAIN. 2016. Technology and trust: older people’s perspectives of a home monitoring system. Ageing and Society 36, 7 (2016), 1501–1525. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X15000501
[44]
Ann Light. 2010. The Panopticon reaches within: how digital technology turns us inside out. Identity in the Information Society 3, 3 (dec 2010), 583–598. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12394-010-0066-7
[45]
Ann Light, Tuck W Leong, and Toni Robertson. 2015. Ageing well with CSCW. In ECSCW 2015: Proceedings of the 14th European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 19-23 September 2015, Oslo, Norway. Springer, 295–304.
[46]
Daria Loi, Christine T. Wolf, Jeanette L. Blomberg, Raphael Arar, and Margot Brereton. 2019. Co-designing AI futures: Integrating AI ethics, social computing, and design. In DIS 2019 Companion - Companion Publication of the 2019 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference. https://doi.org/10.1145/3301019.3320000
[47]
Daniel López Gómez. 2015. Little arrangements that matter. Rethinking autonomy-enabling innovations for later life. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 93 (2015), 91–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2014.02.015
[48]
Deborah Lupton. 2016. The quantified self. John Wiley & Sons.
[49]
John McCarthy and Peter Wright. 2004. Technology as Experience. Vol. 11. 42–43 pages. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPC.2005.859719 arxiv:arXiv:1011.1669v3
[50]
Merriam. 2023. Data Definition & Meaning - Merriam-Webster. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/data
[51]
Swati Mishra and Francesco Cafaro. 2018. Full body interaction beyond fun: Engaging museum visitors in human-data interaction. In Proceedings of the Twelfth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction. 313–319.
[52]
Jimmy Moore, Pascal Goffin, Jason Wiese, and Miriah Meyer. 2021. An interview method for engaging personal data. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies (2021). https://doi.org/10.1145/3494964 arxiv:2107.11441
[53]
Richard Mortier, Hamed Haddadi, Tristan Henderson, Derek McAuley, and Jon Crowcroft. 2014. Human-Data Interaction: The Human Face of the Data-Driven Society. SSRN Electronic Journal (2014). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2508051 arxiv:1412.6159
[54]
Michael J Muller and Sarah Kuhn. 1993. Participatory Design. Commun. ACM 36, 6 (jun 1993), 24–28. https://doi.org/10.1145/153571.255960
[55]
Elizabeth L. Murnane, Tara G. Walker, Beck Tench, Stephen Voida, and Jaime Snyder. 2018. Personal informatics in interpersonal contexts: Towards the design of technology that supports the social ecologies of long-term mental health management. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction (2018). https://doi.org/10.1145/3274396
[56]
Jasmin Niess and Paweł W Woźniak. 2018. Supporting meaningful personal fitness: The tracker goal evolution model. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 1–12.
[57]
William Odom and Ron Wakkary. 2015. Intersecting with unaware objects. In C and C 2015 - Proceedings of the 2015 ACM SIGCHI Conference on Creativity and Cognition. https://doi.org/10.1145/2757226.2757240
[58]
Tadashi Okoshi, Jin Nakazawa, Jeong Gil Ko, Fahim Kawsar, and Susanna Pirttikangas. 2021. WellComp 2021: Fourth International Workshop on Computing for Well-Being. In UbiComp/ISWC 2021 - Adjunct Proceedings of the 2021 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing and Proceedings of the 2021 ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers. https://doi.org/10.1145/3460418.3479262
[59]
Jesper Pedersen, Jacob Buur, and Tom Djajadiningrat. 2003. Field design sessions: augmenting whose reality?International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 16, 3 (2003), 461–476.
[60]
Gonzalo Ramos, Jina Suh, Soroush Ghorashi, Rebecca Fiebrink, Gagan Bansal, Christoper Meek, Richard Banks, Saleema Amershi, and Alison Smith-Renner. 2019. Emerging perspectives in human-centered machine learning. In Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290607.3299014
[61]
Yvonne Rogers, Jeni Paay, Margot Brereton, Kate L Vaisutis, Gary Marsden, and Frank Vetere. 2014. Never Too Old: Engaging Retired People Inventing the Future with MaKey MaKey. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’14). ACM, New York, 3913–3922. https://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557184
[62]
Sirinthip Roomkham. 2020. The potential of personal devices in large-scale sleep studies. Ph. D. Dissertation. Queensland University of Technology.
[63]
Neelima Sailaja, Rhianne Jones, and Derek McAuley. 2021. Designing for Human Data Interaction in Data-Driven Media Experiences. In Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411763.3451808
[64]
Nithya Sambasivan, Shivani Kapania, Hannah Highfill, Diana Akrong, Praveen Paritosh, and Lora M Aroyo. 2021. “Everyone wants to do the model work, not the data work”: Data Cascades in High-Stakes AI. In proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–15.
[65]
Elizabeth B.-N. Sanders and Pieter Jan Stappers. 2008. Co-creation and the new landscapes of design. CoDesign 4, 1 (mar 2008), 5–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710880701875068
[66]
Eva Maria Schomakers, Hannah Biermann, and Martina Ziefle. 2020. Understanding privacy and trust in smart home environments. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50309-3_34
[67]
Phoebe Sengers, Kirsten Boehner, Shay David, and Joseph ’Jofish’ Kaye. 2005. Reflective Design. In Proceedings of the 4th Decennial Conference on Critical Computing: Between Sense and Sensibility(CC ’05). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 49–58. https://doi.org/10.1145/1094562.1094569
[68]
Patrick C. Shih, Kyungsik Han, Erika Shehan Poole, Mary Beth Rosson, and John M. Carroll. 2015. Use and Adoption Challenges of Wearable Activity Trackers. iConference Proceedings (2015).
[69]
Grace Shin, Mohammad Hossein Jarrahi, Yu Fei, Amir Karami, Nicci Gafinowitz, Ahjung Byun, and Xiaopeng Lu. 2019. Wearable activity trackers, accuracy, adoption, acceptance and health impact: A systematic literature review. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103153
[70]
Jesper Simonsen and Finn Kensing. 1994. Take Users Seriously, But Take a Deeper Look: Organizational and Technical Effects from Designing with an Ethnographically Inspired Approach. Proceedings of the Participatory Design Conference (1994).
[71]
Jesper Simonsen and Finn Kensing. 1997. Using Ethnography in Contextual Design. Commun. ACM (1997). https://doi.org/10.1145/256175.256190
[72]
Alan F. Smeaton. 2017. Insights from Data Analytics Into Our Personal Sensor Data. https://doi.org/10.1145/3132635.3132644
[73]
Alessandro Soro, Margot Brereton, Jennyfer Lawrence Taylor, Anita Lee Hong, and Paul Roe. 2016. Cross-cultural dialogical probes. In Proceedings of the First African Conference on Human Computer Interaction. ACM, 114–125.
[74]
Anika Steinert, Marten Haesner, and Elisabeth Steinhagen-Thiessen. 2018. Activity-tracking devices for older adults: comparison and preferences. Universal Access in the Information Society (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-017-0539-7
[75]
Yolande Strengers. 2011. Designing eco-feedback systems for everyday life. In Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.1145/1978942.1979252
[76]
Alex S. Taylor, Laurel Swan, Rachel Eardley, Abigail Sellen, Steve Hodges, and Kenz Wood. 2006. Augmenting refrigerator magnets: Why less is sometimes more. In ACM International Conference Proceeding Series. https://doi.org/10.1145/1182475.1182488
[77]
Jennyfer Lawrence Taylor, Alessandro Soro, Paul Roe, Anita Lee Hong, and Margot Brereton. 2018. “Debrief O’Clock”: Planning, Recording, and Making Sense of a Day in the Field in Design Research. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 308:1—-308:14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173882
[78]
Anja Thieme, Jayne Wallace, James Thomas, Ko Le Chen, Nicole Krämer, and Patrick Olivier. 2011. Lovers’ box: Designing for reflection within romantic relationships. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 69, 5 (2011), 283–297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2010.12.006
[79]
Milka Trajkova, A’aeshah Alhakamy, Francesco Cafaro, Rashmi Mallappa, and Sreekanth R Kankara. 2020. Move your body: Engaging museum visitors with human-data interaction. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–13.
[80]
Elif Tural, Danni Lu, and D Austin Cole. 2021. Safely and actively aging in place: Older adults’ attitudes and intentions toward smart home technologies. Gerontology and geriatric medicine 7 (2021), 23337214211017340.
[81]
Shannon Vallor. 2018. An introduction to data ethics. Course module.) Santa Clara, CA: Markkula Center for Applied Ethics (2018).
[82]
Vincent van Rheden and Bart Hengeveld. 2016. Engagement Through Embodiment. In Proceedings of the TEI ’16: Tenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction. ACM Press, New York, 349–356. https://doi.org/10.1145/2839462.2839498
[83]
Daryoush Daniel Vaziri, Konstantin Aal, Yves J Gschwind, Kim Delbaere, Anne Weibert, Janneke Annegarn, Helios de Rosario, Rainer Wieching, David Randall, and Volker Wulf. 2017. Analysis of effects and usage indicators for a ICT-based fall prevention system in community dwelling older adults. International Journal of Human - Computer Studies 106 (2017), 10–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2017.05.004
[84]
Eliane Zambon Victorelli, Julio Cesar Dos Reis, Heiko Hornung, and Alysson Bolognesi Prado. 2020. Understanding human-data interaction: Literature review and recommendations for design. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 134 (2020), 13–32.
[85]
John Vines, Gary Pritchard, Peter Wright, Patrick Olivier, and Katie Brittain. 2015. An age-old problem: Examining the discourses of ageing in HCI and strategies for future research. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI) 22, 1 (2015), 1–27.
[86]
David Wainwright. 1997. Can sociological research be qualitative, critical and valid?The qualitative report 3, 2 (1997), 1–17.
[87]
Ron Wakkary and Leah Maestri. 2007. The resourcefulness of everyday design. Creativity and Cognition 2007, CC2007 - Seeding Creativity: Tools, Media, and Environments (2007). https://doi.org/10.1145/1254960.1254984
[88]
Ron Wakkary and Leah Maestri. 2008. Aspects of everyday design: Resourcefulness, adaptation, and emergence. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction (2008). https://doi.org/10.1080/10447310802142276
[89]
Torben Wallbaum, Andrii Matviienko, Swamy Ananthanarayan, Thomas Olsson, Wilko Heuten, and Susanne CJ Boll. 2018. Supporting communication between grandparents and grandchildren through tangible storytelling systems. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–12.
[90]
Shengzhi Wang, Khalisa Bolling, Wenlin Mao, Jennifer Reichstadt, Dilip Jeste, Ho-Cheol Kim, and Camille Nebeker. 2019. Technology to support aging in place: older adults’ perspectives. In Healthcare, Vol. 7. MDPI, 60.
[91]
Kaiton Williams. 2015. An Anxious Alliance. Aarhus Series on Human Centered Computing 1, 1 (2015), 121–132. https://doi.org/10.7146/aahcc.v1i1.21146
[92]
World Health Organization. 2020. Decade of Healthy Ageing. World Health Organization (2020).
[93]
Alan Yusheng Wu and Cosmin Munteanu. 2018. Understanding Older Users’ Acceptance of Wearable Interfaces for Sensor-based Fall Risk Assessment. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 119:1—-119:13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173693
[94]
Yitan Zhu, Huai Li, David J. Miller, Zuyi Wang, Jianhua Xuan, Robert Clarke, Eric P. Hoffman, and Yue Wang. 2008. caBIG™ VISDA: Modeling, visualization, and discovery for cluster analysis of genomic data. BMC Bioinformatics (2008). https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-9-383
[95]
Chaim Zins. 2007. Conceptual approaches for defining data, information, and knowledge. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology (2007). https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20508
Index Terms
- Rethinking the Design of Human-Data Interaction through a Study of Older Adults’ Wellbeing
Recommendations
Older adults and hackathons: a qualitative study
Globally observed trends in aging indicate that older adults constitute a growing share of the population and an increasing demographic in the modern technologies marketplace. Therefore, it has become important to address the issue of participation of ...
Recruiting Older Adults in the Wild: Reflections on Challenges and Lessons Learned from Research Experience
PervasiveHealth '18: Proceedings of the 12th EAI International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for HealthcareIt is important to understand the older adults prior to the design process. The understanding can better facilitate design conversations between the researchers and the older adults. In this paper, we discussed our experiences of building a relationship ...
Rethinking the Design of Robotic Pets for Older Adults
DIS '16: Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Designing Interactive SystemsRobots are seen as a potential solution to the perceived needs of the aging population. Thus far, research has primarily focused on robotics for the functional and emotional support of older adults. Robotic pets have been developed primarily for the ...
Comments
Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
December 2023
733 pages
ISBN:9798400717079
DOI:10.1145/3638380
Copyright © 2023 ACM.
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery
New York, NY, United States
Publication History
Published: 10 May 2024
Check for updates
Author Tags
Qualifiers
- Research-article
- Research
- Refereed limited
Data Availability
Presentation video https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3638380.3638451#DataAsCoExperience_v3a.mp4
Funding Sources
Conference
OzCHI 2023
Acceptance Rates
Overall Acceptance Rate 362 of 729 submissions, 50%
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- 0Total Citations
- 163Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)163
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)46
Reflects downloads up to 21 Nov 2024
Other Metrics
Citations
View Options
View options
View or Download as a PDF file.
PDFeReader
View online with eReader.
eReaderHTML Format
View this article in HTML Format.
HTML FormatLogin options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Sign in